1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally related to quality control of hermetic devices and, more particularly, to leak detection of sealed enclosures to ensure their hermeticity over several orders of magnitude, i.e., gross and fine leak detection. Confirming hermeticity is critical for any sealed enclosure, especially one housing of an electrical power source for an implantable medical device. The power source can be either an electrochemical cell or a capacitor.
In either case, the power source includes a negative electrode and a positive electrode physically segregated from each other by a separator and provided with an electrolyte. The specific chemistry of the cell or capacitor is not limited. For example, the cell can be of either a primary chemistry such as of a lithium/silver vanadium oxide or lithium/fluorinated carbon (CFx) couple or of a secondary chemistry such as a lithium ion cell and the capacitor could be a wet tantalum electrolytic type. The only requirement is that the hermetic enclosure for the power source has an electrolyte or some other liquid provided therein that has a vapor pressure more than about 1 mm Hg for fine leak testing and about 0.01 mm Hg for gross leak testing.
2. Prior Art
The industry standard for testing the hermeticity of sealed enclosures is based on helium detection. In this test, the enclosure is placed in a bombing chamber pressurized with helium. A typical pressure is 100 psi and resident time is from one hour to several days. If a leak exists, helium is forced into the void volume of the enclosure. The time and pressure chosen depend on the leak size to be measured and the size of the void volume in the enclosure. After the prescribed time, the enclosure is removed from the bombing chamber and put in a vacuum leak detector where the presence of helium indicates a leak.
A fill port seal for an electrochemical cell predicated on this type of leak detection is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,203,937 to Kraska. Hollow glass bubbles residing between an inner press fit stainless steel ball and an outer metal cover serve as a getter absorbing helium that has leaked past the outer cover for later detection. However, the Kraska seal structure has several shortcomings. Not only is leak detection sensitive to the ratio of leak size to void volume, the detection apparatus 10, as schematically illustrated in
To detect the presence of helium in the getter, the cell as a sealed enclosure 12 is then loaded into the vacuum chamber 14 of the detection apparatus 10. A conduit 16 connects the chamber 14 to a cold trap 18. The use of a cold trap is essential to remove water vapor or other condensable gases in the vacuum system that could impair proper operation.
Conduit 20 leaving the trap 18 leads to a mass spectrometer 22 connected to an analyzer 24. A valve 26 is in the conduit 20. Upstream from valve 26 is a conduit 28 leading to a valve 30 and a high vacuum pump 32. A conduit 34 with valve 36 makes a T-connection with conduit 38. The ends of this conduit 38 lead to a roughing pump 40 and connect back into the conduit 20 upstream from valve 26. A pressure gauge 42 ties into the junction of conduits 20 and 38. A valve 44 is located between the roughing pump 40 and conduit 20.
A helium leak detection test begins by placing the sealed enclosure 12 in the vacuum chamber 14. Valves 26, 30 and 44 are closed with valve 36 between the high vacuum pump 32 and the roughing pump 40 being open. Valve 36 is open so exhaust from the high vacuum pump 32 can be removed. The vacuum chamber 14 is closed, valve 36 is closed and valve 44 is opened. This provides for communication between the roughing pump 40 and the vacuum chamber 14 through trap 18. Roughing pump 40 reduces the pressure inside the chamber 14 to about 100 mTorr. When gauge 42 indicates a system vacuum of about 100 mTorr, valve 44 is closed and valves 30 and 36 are opened bringing the high vacuum pump 32 into the system. The high vacuum pump 32 in communication with the vacuum chamber 14 through the nitrogen trap 18 reduces the system pressure to about 1×10−6 Torr. Suitable pumps for this purpose include oil diffusion pumps, and turbo or cryogenic pumps. The cold trap 18 removes any residual moisture from the atmosphere evacuated from the vacuum chamber 14 so that the pumps 32 and 40 are not damaged once they are put on-line.
When the test condition vacuum is reached, the analyzer system consisting of the mass spectrometer 22 and analyzer 24 is connected to the vacuum chamber 14 by opening valve 26. Typically, a quadrupol mass spectrometer is used because of its ability to selectively pass particles with a characteristic specific charge. The analyzer 24 detects and displays the amount of helium that passes through the mass spectrometer tuned to helium.
Helium leak detection using this type of system has several shortcomings. First, the method only works for enclosures that have a void volume, which is the case for most electronic components, but enclosures such as those for batteries and wet tantalum capacitors are completely filled with a liquid electrolyte. For them, the test does not work reliably. Secondly, setup parameters for a helium leak detection test are dependant on the ratio of leak size to void volume. Since the leak size of a sealed enclosure is not necessarily known, and can vary by several orders of magnitude from one enclosure to the next, correct production setup poses a challenge. Further, the equipment for a helium leak detection is rather complex. For example, vacuum parts need constant maintenance. Gross leaks can contaminate the system to the point that parts have to be replaced, leading to downtime. Gross leaks also decreased system sensitivity, which may not be recognized until the next calibration check. Therefore, a separate test to identify gross leaks is typically first used in conjunction with this test. The mass spectrometer 22 needs constant verification and typically drifts with time and temperature. Consequently, adjustment of a helium leak detector system before use on every shift using a calibrated leak is not uncommon. Finally, a part failure, such as a stuck valve, often leads to downtime and damage to system components.
These problems are avoided when the existence of a leak in a sealed enclosure is based on detecting compounds with a relatively high vapor pressure present in a liquid or added to the liquid in the enclosure for the purpose of detection. In either case, the enclosure is placed in a test chamber and the air therein is analyzed for the detectable compounds. Examples of such a test unit include, but are not limited to, mass spectrometers, chromatographic methods and time-of flight or ion mobility testing.
Implantable medical devices such as cardiac pacemakers, drug pumps, neurostimulators include at least one electrochemical cell as a power source. Defibrillators also include at least one capacitor. It is important to ensure that these power sources are hermetically sealed. This is because they contain many caustic and harmful materials. Should any of them escape from the enclosure housing, the escaping materials could not only harm the device itself, but they could prove lethal. Therefore, it is critically important to be able to quickly, but accurately test sealed enclosures housing implantable medical components to ensure their hermeticity.
Sensing the presence of vapors escaping from contents housed in the enclosures, such as vapors from escaping electrolyte materials does this. This present invention sensing technique replaces the older method of helium detection and utilizes compounds having a relatively high vapor pressure present in the liquid or added to the liquid contained in the enclosure. The enclosure is then placed in an appropriate test chamber and the air therein is analyzed for the specific compounds by standard analytical techniques including mass spectrometry, chromatography and time-of-flight testing.
These and other objects of the present invention will become increasingly more apparent to those skilled in the art by a reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the appended drawings.
Referring back to the drawings,
A shutter grid 128 is located at the entrance to the drift tube 106. The shutter grid 128, which is biased electrically to either block the ions, or allow them to pass through, is pulsed periodically to allow the ions into the drift tube 106. There, they begin to separate out based on their size and shape while flowing counter to a drift gas flow 130 introduced at the end of the drift tube 106. A detector plate 132 located at the far end of drift tube 106 detects the arrival of the ions by producing a current. Smaller ions move faster through the drift tube than larger ones and arrive at the detector plate 132 first. Amplified current from the detector is measured as a function of time and a spectrum is then generated. A microprocessor 134 evaluates the spectrum for the target compound, and determines its concentration based on the peak spectrum height. Because specificity of the membrane 118 enhances ionization and time-of-flight, this system offers a relatively high degree of certainty that the analyzer 100 is measuring only the compound of interest, even in the presence of other interferents. An ion mobility tester similar to that described with respect to the analyzer 100 shown in
For example, a wet tantalum capacitor has an electrolyte containing acetic acid. This compound has a relatively high vapor pressure and is ideal for leak detection using an ion mobility detector analyzer. To further enhance the vaporization rate of acetic acid, the capacitors are heated to a temperature of about 125° C., 54° C. to 55° C. being preferred.
A typical wet tantalum capacitor manufacture by Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc., Clarence, N.Y. has an electrolyte volume of about 0.72 cm3. Acetic acid is typically present in the electrolyte of this model capacitor in a concentration of about 15%, by weight. The vapor pressure of acetic acid is shown in
Assume that within a time frame of 10 years, it is desirable to lose no more than 5% of this volume, or about 0.0375 cm3. Since the electrolyte is mostly water, it is assumed that the density of the electrolyte is 1 g/cm3. The amount of acetic acid in a cubic centimeter of electrolyte is calculated as 0.0375 cm3×1 g/cm3=0.035 grams. There are 5.26×106 minutes in a 10-year period. Losing 0.035 grams of electrolyte over ten years equates to a leak rate of 6.7×10−9 grams of electrolyte/minute over the ten-year period. The fraction of acetic acid in the electrolyte is 15%, by volume. Therefore, the leak detection rate is 1×10−9 grams of acetic acid/minute.
The molecular weight of acetic acid (C2H4O2) is 2(12)+4(1)+2(16)=60 grams/mole. This compound has a specific volume of 22.4 liters/mol, divided by 60 g/mol=0.373 l/gram. This results in a vapor volume of 3.73×10−10 liters/minute=3.73×10−7 cm3/minute.
In a typical test application, clean air constantly streams at a set flow rate over the device. The vapor escaping through leaks in the device mixes with that air with the acetic acid being present at a low concentration. Using a device that samples air at a constant rate, for example, an ion mobility detector requires a specific sensitivity to detect this leak rate. A graphical representation of the requirement based on sample airflow is shown in
Since an ion mobility system is capable of operation at ambient pressure, different modes of operation based on expected leak rates and the vapor pressure of the target compound are feasible. This includes operating in a continuous mode for high leak rates or for compounds with a relatively high vapor pressure. A more sensitive method is to operate in batch mode at ambient pressure in the test chamber. An even more reliable technique is to operate in batch mode with the enclosures being subjected to a vacuum to detect both fine and gross leaks.
A schematic of a continuously operated ion mobility detector analyzer 200 is shown in
A schematic of a batch ion mobility analyzer 300 is illustrated in
If the analyzer 300 detects the presence of the relatively high vapor pressure compound of interest, it is not known which one of the enclosures 302 is leaking. This means that the test must be re-run with a partial lot until the “leaker” is identified. The main advantage of this system is that it uses purifier air or specialized gases that minimize background effects present in ambient air.
A schematic of an ion mobility analyzer in a batch mode where the sealed enclosures 302 are subjected to vacuum is shown in
The vacuum batch method offers, in addition to the increased sensitivity, the advantage of allowing a direct correlation between the standard leak rate (L) as defined in MIL-STD-883, Method 1014, and the concentration of the electrolyte component with a relatively high vapor pressure in a chamber of a given size and at a given temperature. MIL-STD-883, Method 1014 defines the standard leak rate as that quantity of dry air at 25° C. in atmospheric cubic centimeters flowing through a leak or multiple leak paths per second when the high pressure side is at 1 atmosphere (760 mm Hg absolute) and the low pressure side is at a pressure not greater than 1 mm Hg absolute. Standard leak rate should be expressed in units of atmosphere cubic centimeters per second (atm cc/sec.).
The vacuum batch ion mobility method allows for a direct comparison of the electrolyte vapor flow rate with the flow rate of air. The main differences are that while the pressure difference driving the air through the leak is between 759 mm Hg and 760 mm Hg (dependent on the quality of the vacuum), the pressure across the leak in the vacuum batch detection method is that of the vapor pressure of the electrolyte. Further only the chemical component that the detector is tuned for is usable for the detection. This is a fraction of the total vapor getting through the leak. Also, the different gas flow parameters like gas viscosity have to be considered when making the comparison.
The volume of the detected component that is accumulated inside the test chamber can be calculated by multiplying the flow rate of the detected component by the soak time the enclosure (capacitor or cell) resides in the chamber 108. The accumulated vapor is then diluted when the chamber 108 is backfilled with clean, dry air. The concentration of the vapor component can be calculated by dividing the accumulated vapor volume by the total chamber volume. When the gas is pushed into the detector, this concentration is measured as the peak value.
As shown in
From the graph in
Another present invention leak detection method relies on a mass spectrometer to test for a specific chemical leaking from a liquid in a sealed enclosure. The mass spectrometer method is in principle similar to the conventional helium leak detection system described in FIG. 1. Instead of detecting helium introduced as a foreign material into a potential leak in the enclosure, however, the mass spectrometer is adjusted to detect a particular compound known to be present in a liquid contained in the enclosure, for example a compound of an electrolyte in an electrochemical cell or capacitor. The testing cycle begins by placing the sealed enclosure in a vacuum chamber evacuated to a pressure low enough to enable the mass spectrometer to sample the chamber air. If the mass spectrometer detects the compound of interest at a level above a specified threshold, the test enclosure is deemed a leaker.
Another embodiment of a leak detection method according to the present invention relies on a chromatographic system. The two most common chromatographic methods are gas and liquid chromatography. For gas chromatography, the atmosphere around the enclosure is sampled and brought into contact with a medium that allows the air to diffuse into it. Different compounds diffuse at different speeds, leading to separation of the compounds in the air. In liquid chromatography, the sample is immersed in a liquid that serves as a medium through which the leaking compounds diffuse.
Beside acetic acid, other liquid components typically present in capacitor and electrochemical cell electrolytes that are detectible according to the present invention include ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, glycerol, 2-methyl-1,3-propandoil, tetraethylene glycol, polyethylene glycols, polypropylene glycols, polyethylene polypropylene glycol copolymers, ethylene glycol methyl ether, ethylene glycol ethyl ether, diethylene glycol methyl ether, diethylene glycol ethyl ether, dipropylene glycol methyl ether, tripropylene glycol methyl ether, ethylene glycol dimethyl ether, triethylene glycol dimethyl ether, N-ethylformamide, N-methylformamide, N,N-dimethylformamide, N-methylacetamide, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N-methylpyrrolidone, dimethyl acetamide, ethyl lactate, ethylene diacetate, acetonitrile, propionitrile, methoxypropionitrile, γ-butyrolatone, γ-valerolactone, dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, dipropyl carbonate, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, butylene carbonate, ethyl methyl carbonate, methyl propyl carbonate, ethyl propyl carbonate, iso-propyl methyl carbonate, sulfolane, 3-methylsulfolane, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethyl formamide, dimethyl acetate, dimethylsulfolane, tetrahydrofuran, methyl acetate, diglyme, triglyme, tetraglyme, diisopropylether, 1,2-dimethoxyethane, 1,2-diethoxyethane, 1-ethoxy, 2-methoxyethane, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, 3-methyl-2-oxazolidinone, benzene, cumene, ethyl benzene, ethyldiglyme, ethylmonoglyme, fluorotrichloromethane, methylene chloride, propylsulfone, pseudocumene, tetraethylorthosilicate, toluene, m-xylene, o-xylene, ammonium acetate, ammonium phosphate, ammonium borate, propionic acid, butyric acid, methylbutyric acid, iso-butyric acid, trimethylacetic acid, and mixtures thereof.
Thus, the present invention has been particularly described with respect to a sealed enclosure being either a capacitor or an electrochemical cell. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present leak detection methods are equally applicable to any sealed enclosure having a first part sealed to a second part with a liquid contained therein. The liquid need not occupy the entire volume of the enclosure, but must contain at least one component having a vapor pressure at 25° C. of more than about 0.1 mm Hg. This component can assist in the functioning of the device such as an electrolyte, or be added for the sole purpose of leak detection.
It is appreciated that various modifications to the inventive concepts described herein may be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority from provisional application Ser. No. 60/510,601, filed Oct. 10, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60510601 | Oct 2003 | US |