The present disclosure relates to a leakage transformer.
In a leakage transformer, a bypass core that is a magnetic member is inserted between a primary coil and a secondary coil wound around a core, and the bypass core is a magnetic flux path for a leakage magnetic flux.
In a transformer disclosed in Patent Literature 1, the bypass core is divided, and the transformer is equipped with a gap having a freely set spacing in the interval of the gap.
Patent Literature 1: Examined Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H04-012015
In the transformer disclosed in Patent Literature 1, the interval of the gap is set so as to adjust saturation of the leakage magnetic flux. When the interval of the gap is set, a portion of the magnetic flux leaks when an operating frequency of an inverter device, for example, connected to the primary side of the transformer rises. The leakage magnetic flux may interlink with the primary coil and the secondary coil so that eddy currents are generated. The transformer may suffer from localized heating in the primary coil and the secondary coil due to the generation of eddy currents.
The present disclosure is achieved in consideration of the aforementioned circumstances, and an objective of the present disclosure is to suppress or prevent the generation of localized heating in the leakage transformer.
In order to achieve the aforementioned objective, a leakage transformer of the present disclosure includes: a primary coil wound around a core, a secondary coil wound around the core, a plurality of bypass cores, and at least one non-magnetic member arranged between the bypass cores. The bypass cores are arranged between the primary coil and the secondary coil, and are magnetic members in which a portion of the magnetic flux generated by the core is internally induced. The plurality of bypass cores are disposed with gaps therebetween in a direction of the internally induced magnetic flux. A total value of the gaps of the bypass cores is determined in accordance with a target value of leakage inductance. A maximum value of the gaps of the bypass cores is less than or equal to a value obtained by multiplying a minimum value of gaps between the bypass cores and each of the primary coil and the secondary coil by a positive coefficient less than one.
According to the present disclosure, localized heating in the leakage transformer can be suppressed or prevented by making the maximum value of the gaps of the bypass cores disposed between the primary coil and the secondary coil less than or equal to a value obtained by multiplying the minimum value of the gaps between the bypass cores and each of the primary coil and the secondary coil by the positive coefficient less than one.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are described below in detail with reference to drawings. In the drawings, components that are the same or equivalent are assigned the same reference sign.
In the example of
Bypass cores 15a that are magnetic members are provided between the primary coil 11a and the secondary coil 12a. In the same manner, bypass cores 15b that are magnetic members are provided between the primary coil 11b and the secondary coil 12b, and bypass cores 15c that are magnetic members are provided between the primary coil 11c and the secondary coil 12c. A portion of the magnetic flux generated in the core 10 is induced within the bypass cores 15a, 15b, and 15c. The bypass cores 15a, 15b, and 15c are disposed at positions nearest the center in the disposal direction of the leg members 102a, 102b, and 102c. As illustrated in
As illustrated in the upper part in
A high frequency component leakage magnetic flux is generated in the flow path formed by the spacers 14a between the primary coil 11a and the secondary coil 12a, and a portion of the leakage magnetic flux interlinks the primary coil 11a and the secondary coil 12a. When a magnetic flux density of the leakage magnetic flux interlinked with the primary coil 11a is taken to be B, a frequency of the input current of the leakage transformer 1 is taken to be f, a thickness in the direction orthogonal to the central axis of the primary coil 11a is taken to be t, and a resistivity of the primary coil 11a is taken to be ρ, then an eddy current loss Pe per unit area is generated in the primary coil 11a indicated by Equation (1) below. For example, when the primary coil 11a is copper, the eddy current loss Pe per unit area is expressed by Equation (2) below. The magnetic flux density B can be found by electromagnetic field analysis.
The leakage magnetic flux enters the interior of the primary coil 11a to a skin depth δ due to the skin effect. Taking absolute permeability of the primary coil 11a to be μ, the skin depth δ is expressed by Equation (3) below. For example, when the primary coil 11a is copper, the skin depth δ is expressed by Equation (4) below.
The leakage magnetic fluxes of the high frequency components concentrate at the position of the skin depth δ Thus the thickness tin the direction orthogonal to the central axis of the primary coil 11a is taken to be less than or equal to 2δ in the present embodiment. In the same manner as the primary coil 11a, an eddy current loss Pe per unit area is generated also in the secondary coil 12a. Further, the leakage magnetic flux enters the interior of the secondary coil 12a to the skin depth δ due to the skin effect. Thus the depth in the direction orthogonal to the central axis of the secondary coil 12a in a similar manner is taken to be less than or equal to 2δ also in the secondary coil 12a. In a similar manner, the thickness in the direction orthogonal to the central axis of each of the primary coils 11b and 11c and the secondary coils 12b and 12c is each taken to be less than or equal to 2δ.
A magnetic resistance R of the leakage inductance can be regarded as being equal to a magnetic resistance Rg generated in the gap 55. Taking a winding count of the primary coil 51 to be n1, and taking the cross-sectional area of the bypass core 54 in a cross section orthogonal to the central axes of the primary coil 51 and the secondary coil 52 to be Ag, the magnetic resistance of the leakage inductance is expressed by Equation (5) below, and a leakage inductance L is expressed by Equation (6) below. The magnetic permeability of air can be regarded to be the same as the magnetic permeability of the vacuum, and thus the magnetic permeability μ0 of the vacuum is used as the magnetic permeability of air.
The winding count n1 of the primary coil 51 and the cross-sectional area Ag of the bypass core 54 are determined in accordance with the design of the leakage transformer 5. Thus adjustment of the spacing direction length g of the gap 55 is required in order to obtain a desired leakage inductance L.
For the leakage transformer 5 illustrated in
An example is described below in which equal gaps are arranged between n+1 bypass cores 15b between the primary coil 11b and the secondary coil 12b. In this case, the number n of the bypass cores 15b is determined such that the relationship of Equation (7) below is established. In Equation (7) below, m is greater than zero and less than one, and, for example, is 0.1.
Due to the length of the gap 17b g/n being made sufficiently smaller than the gap d between the bypass core 15b and the primary coil 11b and the secondary coil 12b, the difference between the magnetic resistance Rg passing through the gap 17b and the magnetic resistance Ra passing through a position nearer the primary coil 11b or the secondary coil 12b than the gap 17b becomes larger than in the case of the leakage transformer 5 illustrated in
For the leakage transformer 1 according to the present embodiment in the aforementioned manner, the maximum value of the gaps between the bypass cores 15a is less than or equal to the value obtained by multiplying the minimum value of the gaps between the bypass core 15a and each of the primary coil 11a and the secondary coil 12a by the positive coefficient m that is less than one. In a similar manner, the maximum value of the gaps between the bypass cores 15b is less than or equal to the value obtained by multiplying the minimum value of the gaps between the bypass core 15b and each of the primary coil 11b and the secondary coil 12b by the positive coefficient m that is less than one. The maximum value of the gaps between the bypass cores 15c is less than or equal to the value obtained by multiplying the minimum value of the gaps between the bypass core 15c and each of the primary coil 11c and the secondary coil 12c by the positive coefficient m that is less than one. Further, the thickness t in the direction orthogonal to the central axes of the primary coils 11a, 11b, and 11c and the secondary coils 12a, 12b, and 12c is less than or equal to two times the skin depth δ due to the skin effect. Due to the above configuration, localized heating of the leakage transformer 1 can be suppressed or prevented.
Device size and installation location are restricted when the power converter 2 is mounted on the electric railway vehicle. In the leakage transformer 1 according to the present embodiment, localized heating in the leakage transformer 1 can be suppressed or prevented even without widening the respective gaps d between the bypass cores 15a, 15b, and 15c and each of the primary coils 11a, 11b, and 11c and the secondary coils 12a, 12b, and 12c. That is, even when device size and installation location are restricted as in the electric railway vehicle, the power converter 2 can be used that has the leakage transformer 1 according to the present embodiment.
Embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited to the aforementioned embodiment.
The foregoing describes some example embodiments for explanatory purposes. Although the foregoing discussion has presented specific embodiments, persons skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. This detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the invention is defined only by the included claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2016/070735 | 7/13/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/011924 | 1/18/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2963669 | Salisbury | Dec 1960 | A |
5053738 | Sato et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5315982 | Ward | May 1994 | A |
6980077 | Chandrasekaran | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20150256061 | Koji et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150279552 | Ginglseder | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150302981 | Kaneko et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
S54-020328 | Feb 1979 | JP |
56079415 | Jun 1981 | JP |
56079415 | Jun 1981 | JP |
S57-130402 | Aug 1982 | JP |
S64-041114 | Mar 1989 | JP |
03166708 | Jul 1991 | JP |
04012015 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05299264 | Nov 1993 | JP |
08008131 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08288086 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09180951 | Jul 1997 | JP |
200021659 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000021659 | Jan 2000 | JP |
200735664 | Feb 2007 | JP |
3187497 | Dec 2013 | JP |
3187497 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2013124941 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013124941 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014061154 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO-2014061154 | Apr 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action (Notification of Reasons for Refusal) dated Mar. 19, 2019, by the Japan Patent Office in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-527318 and English translation of the Office Action. (8 pages). |
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) dated Sep. 20, 2016, by the Japan Patent Office as the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/JP2016/070735. |
Office Action (Notice of Reasons for Refusal) dated Jun. 4, 2019, by the Japan Patent Office in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-527318 and English translation of the Office Action. (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190304676 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |