This application claims priority from European patent application No. 04425437.3, filed Jun. 14, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to a LED driving device with variable light intensity.
As is known, thanks to the marked development of silicon-based technologies, high-efficiency light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are increasingly used in the field of lighting, whether industrial or domestic lighting. For example, high-efficiency LEDs are commonly used in automotive applications (in particular for the manufacturing the rear lights of motor vehicles), in road signs, or in traffic lights.
According to the light intensity that it is desired to obtain, it is possible to connect alternately a number of LEDs in series or a number of arrays of LEDs in parallel (by the term array is meant, in this context, a certain number of LEDs connected in series to one another). Clearly, the number of LEDs and the criterion of connection adopted determine the characteristics of the driving device (hereinafter “driver”) that must be used for driving the LEDs.
In particular, with the increase in the number of LEDs connected in series, the value of the output voltage of the driver must increase, while, with the increase in the number of arrays in parallel, the value of the current that the driver must be able to furnish for supplying the LEDs must increase.
Furthermore, the intensity of current supplied to a LED determines its spectrum of emission and hence the color of the light emitted. It follows that, to prevent the spectrum of emission of a LED from varying, it is of fundamental importance that the supply current should be kept constant, and hence generally the driver used for driving the LEDs is constituted by a current-controlled DC/DC converter.
As is known, the topology of the DC/DC converter differs according to the type of application envisaged. Normally, the configurations “flyback” or “buck” are used, respectively, if an electrical insulation is required or if the driver is supplied directly by the electric power-supply mains (and hence there is no need to step up the input voltage), whereas the “boost” configuration is used when the driver is battery-supplied and it is hence necessary to step up the input voltage.
In many applications, it is required to vary the intensity of the light emitted by the LED gradually, this operation being known by the term “dimming”.
On the other hand, it is not possible to simply vary (either decrease or increase) the supply current supplied to the LED, in so far as it is not possible to accept the change of color of the emitted light (typically, constancy in the spectrum of emission is required), color which, as mentioned, depends upon the supply current.
For this reason, currently drivers for LEDs comprise a pulse-width-modulation (PWM) control for turning on and turning off LEDs at low-frequency (100-200 Hz), with a ratio between turning-on time and turning-off time (duty cycle) that is a function of the level of light intensity required.
To achieve turning-on and turning-off of LEDs, a switch is set in series between the output of the DC/DC converter and the LEDs themselves. Said switch, controlled in PWM, enables or disables the supply of the LEDs. In particular, during the ON phase of the PWM control signal, the switch closes, enabling passage of the supply current to the LEDs and hence their turning-on, while during the OFF phase of the PWM control signal the switch is open, interrupting passage of the supply current and hence causing turning-off of the LEDs. Clearly, the frequency of the PWM control signal is such that the human eye, given the stay time of the image on the retina, does not perceive turning-on and turning-off of the LEDs, since it perceives a light emitted in a constant way.
The circuit described, albeit enabling dimming of the LEDs to be obtained, presents, however, certain disadvantages linked to the presence of a switch connected to the output of the DC/DC converter in series with the load.
In fact, in the majority of applications, high-efficiency LEDs require high supply currents, in the region of various hundreds of mA (typically between 100 mA and 700 mA). Consequently, the switch set in series to the load must be a power switch; moreover, it must have low leakages in conduction in order not to limit the efficiency for driving. On the other hand, the higher the supply current required by the LEDs, the more critical the choice of the power switch, and consequently the higher the cost of the switch and as a whole the cost of construction of the driver.
The aim of embodiments of the present invention is to provide a LED-driving device that is be free from the drawbacks described above, and in particular that enables adjustment of the light intensity of the LEDs in a more economical and efficient way.
According to an embodiment of the present invention there is provided a LED driving device and method with variable light intensity.
For a better understanding of the present invention, there is now described a preferred embodiment thereof, which is provided purely by way of non-limiting example and with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
The following discussion is presented to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. Various modifications to the embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
The idea underlying embodiments of the present invention draws its origin from the consideration that a LED can be considered as a normal diode, with the sole difference that it has a higher threshold voltage Vf (normally around 3 V as against the 0.7 V of a normal diode). It follows that a LED automatically turns off when it is biased with a voltage lower than the threshold voltage Vf. In particular, to obtain turning-off of the LEDs, the driving circuit passes from a current control mode to a voltage control mode, which limits the output voltage to a value lower than the threshold voltage of the LEDs. By varying the intervals of time when the two control modes are active, for example via a PWM control, it is possible to vary the light intensity of the LEDs.
For a better understanding of the above, reference is now made to
In detail, the driving device 1 comprises a pair of input terminals 2, 3, receiving a supply voltage Vin (in this case, coming from the electric power-supply mains) and a first and a second output terminals 4, 5, connected to the load that must be driven. In particular the load is formed by 1 to N arrays 6 of LEDs 7 arranged in parallel, and each array 6 can contain a variable number of LEDs 7 connected in series to each other.
The driving device 1 moreover comprises an AC/DC converter 8 connected to the input terminals 2, 3 and operating as a rectifier of the mains voltage, and a supply stage 9, cascade-connected to the AC/DC converter 8 and supplying an output supply voltage Vout and an output supply current Iout. The supply stage 9 is basically formed by a DC/DC converter and has a first and a second outputs 10a, 10b, connected to the first and the second output terminals 4, 5, respectively. A current sensor 11 is connected between the second output terminal 5 of the driving device 1 and the second output 10b of the supply stage 9, and outputs a current-feedback signal V1fb proportional to the current flowing in the load and co-operating with the supply stage 9 for controlling of the current Iout. Typically, the current sensor 11 comprises a sensing resistor (as described in detail in
The driving device 1 moreover comprises a PWM control circuit 13, of a known type, and an enabling stage 14. The PWM control circuit 13 receives an external command, indicated schematically by the arrow 17, and generates a PWM control signal, the pulse width whereof is modifiable via the external control circuit 13, in a known way.
The enabling stage 14, controlled by the PWM control signal, is connected between the first and second outputs 10a, 10b of the supply stage 9 and outputs a voltage-feedback signal V2fb having two functions: on the one hand, it enables/disables the voltage control of the supply stage 9; on the other, it supplies an information correlated to the voltage Vout.
To this end, the enabling stage 14 comprises a voltage sensor formed by a resistive divider (as illustrated in detail in
Operation of the driving device 1 is as follows.
In normal operating conditions, when the voltage control of the supply stage 9 is disabled by the enabling stage 14 (for example, during the OFF phase of the PWM control signal), the supply stage 9 works in a current control mode and uses the current-feedback signal V1fb so that the output current Iout has a preset value, such as to forward bias the LEDs 7, which thus conduct and emit light.
In particular, the output current Iout has a value equal to the sum of the currents I1, . . . IN that are to be supplied to the various arrays 6 for forward biasing the LEDs 7. The output voltage Vout has, instead, a value fixed automatically by the number of driven LEDs 7 (for example, a total threshold voltage value of 35 V, when an array 6 is made up of ten LEDs and each LED has an on-voltage drop of 3.5 V).
In this step, then, the current control enables precise control of the value of the supply current of the LEDs 7 according to the desired spectrum of emission.
When, instead, the voltage control of the supply stage 9 is enabled by the enabling stage 14 (in the example, during the ON phase of the PWM control signal), the value of the voltage Vout is limited to a value smaller than the minimum threshold voltage of the arrays 6, so causing turning-off of the LEDs 7, as explained in greater detail with reference to
The PWM control circuit 13, by varying appropriately the duty cycle of the PWM control signal that controls the enabling stage 14, enables regulation of the intensity of the light emitted by the LEDs 7 In the example, with the increase in the duty cycle, the time interval when the control of the supply stage 9 is a current control and the LEDs 7 are forward biased, increases, and consequently the intensity of the light emitted increases. In particular, a duty cycle equal to zero corresponds to a zero light intensity, while a duty cycle equal to one corresponds to a maximum intensity of the light emitted by the LEDs 7.
As may be noted, during the ON phase of the PWM control signal the supply stage 9 works in a current control mode, outputting the current Iout for supply of the LEDs 7; the voltage Vout assumes a value, for example 35 V. Instead, during the OFF phase of the PWM control signal the supply stage 9 works in a voltage control mode, limiting the output voltage Vout to a value, for example 2 V, while the current Iout goes to zero.
By appropriately varying the duty cycle of the PWM control signal (as indicated by the arrows in
In particular, a detailed description of the current sensor 11, the enabling stage 14, and the supply stage 9 is given, since the other components are of a known type.
In detail, the current sensor 11 comprises a sensing resistor 20 connected between the second output 10b, which is grounded, of the supply stage 9 and the second output terminal 5.
The enabling stage 14 comprises a first resistor 27 and a second resistor 28, connected in series. The first resistor 27 is connected between the first output terminal 4 and a first intermediate node 31, while the second resistor 28 is connected between the first intermediate node 31 and a second intermediate node 32. The voltage-feedback signal V2fb is present on the first intermediate node 31. The enabling stage 14 further comprises a third resistor 37 connected between the second intermediate node 32 and the second output 10b of the supply stage 9, and a bipolar transistor 40 of an NPN type, having its collector terminal connected to the second intermediate node 32, its emitter terminal connected to the second output 10b, and its base terminal receiving the PWM control signal generated in a known way by the PWM control circuit 13. The third resistor 37 forms, together with the first resistor 27 and the second resistor 28, a resistive divider 12, controllable via the PWM control signal.
The supply stage 9 comprises a DC/DC converter 15, of a “flyback” type, cascaded to the AC/DC converter 8 and having the first output 10a and the second output 10b. The supply stage 9 moreover comprises a selection stage 16 receiving the current-feedback signal V1fb and the voltage-feedback signal V2fb, and having an output connected to a feedback input 26 of the DC/DC converter 15. In particular, the selection stage 16 alternately feeds the feedback input 26 with the voltage-feedback signal V2fb and the current-feedback signal V1fb so as to enable, respectively, voltage control and current control.
In detail, the selection stage 16 comprises a first and a second operational amplifiers 21, 30. The first operational amplifier 21 has its inverting terminal connected to the second output terminal 5 and receiving the current-feedback signal V1fb, its non-inverting terminal receiving a first reference voltage Vref1, of preset value, and an output connected, via the interposition of a first diode 24, to a feedback node 23, which is in turn connected to the feedback input 26 of the DC/DC converter 15. The first diode 24 has its anode connected to the output of the first operational amplifier 21 and its cathode connected to the feedback node 23. Furthermore, a first capacitor 25 is connected between the inverting terminal of the first operational amplifier 21 and the cathode of the first diode 24. The second operational amplifier 30 has its inverting terminal connected to the first intermediate node 31 and receiving the voltage-feedback signal V2fb, its non-inverting terminal receiving a second reference voltage Vref2, of preset value, and an output connected to the feedback node 23 via a second diode 34. The second diode 34 has its anode connected to the output of the second operational amplifier 30 and its cathode connected to the feedback node 23. Furthermore, a second capacitor 35 is connected between the inverting terminal of the second operational amplifier 30 and the cathode of the second diode 34.
In practice, two distinct feedback paths are formed, which join in the feedback node 23. A first path, which comprises the current sensor 11, enables current control through the current-feedback signal V1fb, in so far as it detects the value of the output current Iout via the sensing resistor 20. A second path, which comprises the enabling stage 14, enables, instead, voltage control through the voltage-feedback signal V2fb, in so far as it detects the value of the output voltage Vout via the resistive divider 12.
The two feedback paths are enabled alternately by the enabling stage 14.
In fact, the transistor 40 acts as a switch controlled by the PWM control signal generated by the PWM control circuit 13, determining, with its opening and its closing, two different division ratios of the resistive divider 12 and hence different values of the voltage-feedback signal V2fb.
In detail, when the transistor 40 is turned on (ON phase of the PWM control signal), the third resistor 37 is short-circuited and the resistive divider 12 is formed only by the first resistor 27 and second resistor 28 having resistances R1 and R2, respectively. In this situation, the voltage-feedback signal V2fb assumes a first value V2fb1 equal to
whereas, when the transistor 40 is turned off (OFF phase of the PWM control signal), the resistive divider 12 is formed by the first resistor 27, the second resistor 28, and a third resistor 37, wherein the third resistor 37 has a resistance R3. In this case, the voltage-feedback signal V2fb assumes a second value V2fb2 equal to
where obviously V2fb2>V2fb1.
It follows that, during the ON phase of the PWM control signal, the inverting terminal of the second operational amplifier 30 is at a potential V2fb1 smaller than that of the non-inverting terminal receiving the second reference voltage Vref2, so that the output of the second operational amplifier 30 becomes positive, causing an off-state of the second diode 34. Instead, the first operational amplifier 21 receives, on its inverting terminal, a voltage V1fb proportional to the current flowing in the sensing resistor 20, greater than the first reference voltage Vref1, and hence the first diode 24 is on. In this way, the feedback node 23 is connected to the first feedback path, and the voltage control is disabled, whereas the current control through the current sensor 11 is enabled. The first reference voltage Vref1 has a low value (for example, 100 mV) so as to limit the power dissipation on the sensing resistor 20.
Instead, during the OFF phase of the PWM control signal, the inverting terminal of the second operational amplifier 30 is at a potential V2fb2 higher than that of the non-inverting terminal, receiving the second reference voltage Vref2, so that the output of the second operational amplifier 30 becomes negative, causing turning-on of the second diode 34. Instead, in this situation, the first diode 24 is turned off. In this way, the feedback node 23 is connected to the second feedback path, and consequently the voltage control is enabled, which limits the output voltage Vout to a value lower than the threshold voltage of the array 6, as described above. The value of the second reference voltage Vref2 supplied to the non-inverting terminal of the second operational amplifier 30, and the values of the resistances are chosen so that the output voltage Vout assumes the desired value.
The driving device described herein presents the following advantages, although all such as advantages need not be realized by all embodiments of the present invention.
First, it has a driving efficiency greater than known driving devices, in so far as it does not have elements arranged in series to the load that generate leakages.
Furthermore, the production costs are decidedly lower, in so far as the need for the presence of a costly power switch is avoided, since the latter is replaced by a simple signal switch, of negligible cost.
Finally, in the case of integration of the driving device, it does not present problems of power dissipation, with consequent savings and greater simplicity of production.
Finally, it is clear that modifications and variations can be made to the device for driving LEDs described and illustrated herein, without thereby departing from the scope of the present invention, as defined in the annexed claims.
In particular, it is emphasized that the present driving device, although designed for driving arrays of LEDs of the type described, does not include said light-emitting elements, which consequently do not form part of the driving device.
Furthermore,
Operation of the driving device 1 according to this further embodiment is now described, referring to the situation in which the driving device 1 drives an array 6 having a number of LEDs 7 equal to Nled.
When the transistor 40 is turned on (ON phase of the PWM control signal), the voltage-feedback signal V2fb assumes the first value V2fb1:
The first value V2fb1 is smaller than the second reference voltage Vref2, so that the current control through the current sensor 11 is enabled (as previously described). The LEDs 7 are thus in the on-state and the output voltage Vout is Nled·3,5 V (3.5 V being the on-voltage drop of each LED 7 of the array 6).
Instead, during the OFF phase of the PWM control signal, the transistor 40 is turned off, and the voltage-feedback signal V2fb is instantaneously pulled up to a value higher than the second reference voltage Vref2 (zener diode 42 can limit this value so that a maximum voltage that can be applied to the second operational amplifier 30 is not exceeded), thus enabling voltage control. Therefore, the output current Iout flowing in the LEDs 7 falls to zero, while the output voltage Vout decreases down to Nled·2 V (2 V being the threshold voltage of each LED 7). Further decrease of the output voltage Vout is not possible, due to high output impedance.
Capacitor C at the output of the supply stage 9 thus experiences a voltage variation ΔV at the switching between the ON and the OFF phase of the PWM control signal, which is equal to Nled·1.5V. This voltage variation ΔV causes a delay t in the reactivation of LEDs 7 (due to the charging of capacitor C) of:
Given a same value of the capacitor C, the delay t in this further embodiment is greatly reduced with respect to the circuit shown in
ΔV=(3.5·Nled−2)
since the output voltage Vout is limited to 2 V during the OFF stage of the PWM control signal (irrespective of the number of LEDs 7), and so the delay t is given by:
In particular, the advantage in terms of reduction of the delay time t increases with the increase of the number Nled of LEDs 7 in the array 6.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04425437 | Jun 2004 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5887967 | Chang | Mar 1999 | A |
6040663 | Bucks et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6227679 | Zhang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6456051 | Darzy | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6747420 | Barth et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7298350 | Kitazawa et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7511436 | Xu | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20010024112 | Jacobs et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020043943 | Menzer et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030085749 | Xu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117087 | Barth et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060022916 A1 | Feb 2006 | US |