LED lamp

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9951938
  • Patent Number
    9,951,938
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 24, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 24, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A light emitting apparatus comprising an at least substantially omnidirectional light assembly including an LED-based light source within a light-transmissive envelope. Electronics configured to drive the LED-based light source, the electronics being disposed within a base having a blocking angle no larger than 45°. A plurality of heat dissipation elements (such as fins) in thermal communication with the base and extending adjacent the envelope.
Description
BACKGROUND

The following relates to the illumination arts, lighting arts, solid-state lighting arts, and related arts.


Incandescent and halogen lamps are conventionally used as both omni-directional and directional light sources. Omnidirectional lamps are intended to provide substantially uniform intensity distribution versus angle in the far field, greater than 1 meter away from the lamp, and find diverse applications such as in desk lamps, table lamps, decorative lamps, chandeliers, ceiling fixtures, and other applications where a uniform distribution of light in all directions is desired.


With reference to FIG. 1, a coordinate system is described which is used herein to describe the spatial distribution of illumination generated by an incandescent lamp or, more generally, by any lamp intended to produce omnidirectional illumination. The coordinate system is of the spherical coordinate system type, and is shown with reference to an incandescent A-19 style lamp L. For the purpose of describing the far field illumination distribution, the lamp L can be considered to be located at a point L0, which may for example coincide with the location of the incandescent filament. Adapting spherical coordinate notation conventionally employed in the geographic arts, a direction of illumination can be described by an elevation or latitude coordinate and an azimuth or longitude coordinate. However, in a deviation from the geographic arts convention, the elevation or latitude coordinate used herein employs a range [0°, 180°] where: θ=0° corresponds to “geographic north” or “N”. This is convenient because it allows illumination along the direction θ=0° to correspond to forward-directed light. The north direction, that is, the direction θ=0°, is also referred to herein as the optical axis. Using this notation, θ=180° corresponds to “geographic south” or “S” or, in the illumination context, to backward-directed light. The elevation or latitude θ=90° corresponds to the “geographic equator” or, in the illumination context, to sideways-directed light.


With continuing reference to FIG. 1, for any given elevation or latitude an azimuth or longitude coordinate can also be defined, which is everywhere orthogonal to the elevation or latitude θ. The azimuth or longitude coordinate θ has a range [0°, 360°], in accordance with geographic notation.


It will be appreciated that at precisely north or south, that is, at θ=0° or at θ=180° (in other words, along the optical axis), the azimuth or longitude coordinate has no meaning, or, perhaps more precisely, can be considered degenerate. Another “special” coordinate is θ=90° which defines the plane transverse to the optical axis which contains the light source (or, more precisely, contains the nominal position of the light source for far field calculations, for example the point L0).


In practice, achieving uniform light intensity across the entire longitudinal span φ=[0°, 360°] is typically not difficult, because it is straightforward to construct a light source with rotational symmetry about the optical axis (that is, about the axis θ=0°). For example, the incandescent lamp L suitably employs an incandescent filament located at coordinate center L0 which can be designed to emit substantially omnidirectional light, thus providing a uniform intensity distribution respective to the azimuth θ for any latitude.


However, achieving ideal omnidirectional intensity respective to the elevational or latitude coordinate is generally not practical. For example, the lamp L is constructed to fit into a standard “Edison base” lamp fixture, and toward this end the incandescent lamp L includes a threaded Edison base EB, which may for example be an E25, E26, or E27 lamp base where the numeral denotes the outer diameter of the screw turns on the base EB, in millimeters. The Edison base EB (or, more generally, any power input system located “behind” the light source) lies on the optical axis “behind” the light source position L0, and hence blocks backward emitted light (that is, blocks illumination along the south latitude, that is, along θ=180°), and so the incandescent lamp L cannot provide ideal omnidirectional light respective to the latitude coordinate.


Commercial incandescent lamps, such as 60 W Soft White incandescent lamps (General Electric, New York, USA) are readily constructed which provide intensity across the latitude span θ=[0°, 135°] which is uniform to within ±20% (area D) of the average intensity (line C) over that latitude range as shown in FIG. 2. Plot A shows the intensity distribution for an incandescent lamp with a filament aligned horizontally to the optical axis, and plot B shows the intensity distribution for an incandescent lamp with a filament aligned with the optical axis. This is generally considered an acceptable intensity distribution uniformity for an omnidirectional lamp, although there is some interest in extending this uniformity span still further, such as to a latitude span of θ=[0°, 150°] with ±10% uniformity. These uniformity spans would be effective in meeting current and pending regulations on LED lamps such as U.S. DoE Energy Star Draft 2, and U.S. DoE Lighting Prize.


By comparison with incandescent and halogen lamps, solid-state lighting technologies such as light emitting diode (LED) devices are highly directional by nature, as they are a flat device emitting from only one side. For example, an LED device, with or without encapsulation, typically emits in a directional Lambertian spatial intensity distribution having intensity that varies with cos(θ) in the range θ=[0°, 90°] and has zero intensity for θ>90°. A semiconductor laser is even more directional by nature, and indeed emits a distribution describable as essentially a beam of forward-directed light limited to a narrow cone around θ=0°.


Another challenge associated with solid-state lighting is that unlike an incandescent filament, an LED chip or other solid-state lighting device typically cannot be operated efficiently using standard 110V or 220V a.c. power. Rather, on-board electronics are typically provided to convert the a.c. input power to d.c. power of lower voltage amenable for driving the LED chips. As an alternative, a series string of LED chips of sufficient number can be directly operated at 110V or 220V, and parallel arrangements of such strings with suitable polarity control (e.g., Zener diodes) can be operated at 110V or 220V a.c. power, albeit at substantially reduced power efficiency. In either case, the electronics constitute additional components of the lamp base as compared with the simple Edison base used in integral incandescent or halogen lamps.


Yet another challenge in solid-state lighting is the need for heat sinking. LED devices are highly temperature-sensitive in both performance and reliability as compared with incandescent or halogen filaments. This is addressed by placing a mass of heat sinking material (that is, a heat sink) contacting or otherwise in good thermal contact with the LED device. The space occupied by the heat sink blocks emitted light and hence further limits the ability to generate an omnidirectional LED-based lamp. This limitation is enhanced when a LED lamp is constrained to the physical size of current regulatory limits (ANSI, NEMA, etc.) that define maximum dimensions for all lamp components, including light sources, electronics, optical elements, and thermal management.


The combination of electronics and heat sinking results in a large base that blocks “backward” illumination, which has heretofore substantially limited the ability to generate omnidirectional illumination using an LED replacement lamp. The heat sink in particular preferably has a large volume and also large surface area in order to dissipate heat away from the lamp by a combination of convection and radiation.


Currently, the majority of commercially available LED lamps intended as incandescent replacements do not provide a uniform intensity distribution that is similar to incandescent lamps. For example, a hemispherical element may be placed over an LED light source. The resultant intensity distribution is mainly upward going, with little light emitted below the equator. Clearly, this does not provide an intensity distribution, which satisfactorily emulates an incandescent lamp.


BRIEF SUMMARY

Embodiments are disclosed herein as illustrative examples. In one, the light emitting apparatus comprises a light transmissive envelope surrounding an LED light source. The light source is in thermal communication with a heat sinking base element. A plurality of surface area enhancing elements are in thermal communication with the base element and extend in a direction such that the elements are adjacent to the light-emitting envelope. Properly designed surface area enhancing elements will provide adequate thermal dissipation while not significantly disturbing the light intensity distribution from the LED light source.


According to another embodiment, a light emitting apparatus including a light emitting diode light source is provided. The light emitting diode is in thermal communication with a base element. The base element has a light blocking angle of between 15° and 45°. A plurality of surface area enhancing elements are located in thermal communication with the base element and increase the thermal dissipation capacity of apparatus by a factor of 4× and absorb less than 10% of an emitted light flux.


In another embodiment, a light emitting device comprises a plurality of light emitting diodes mounted to a metal core printed circuit board (MCPCB) and receive electrical power therefrom. A heat sink having a first cylindrical section and a second truncated cone section is provided and the MCPCB is in thermal communication with the truncated cone section of the heat sink. An Edison screw base is provided adjacent the cylindrical section of the heat sink. An electrical connection is provided between the screw base, any required electronics contained in the cylindrical section, and the MCPCB. A light diffusing envelope extends from the truncated cone section of the heat sink and encompasses the light emitting diodes. Preferably, at least four heat dissipating fins are in thermal communication with the heat sink and extend therefrom adjacent the envelope. The fins have a first relatively thin section adjacent the heat sink, a second relatively thin section adjacent the envelope remote from the heat sink and a relatively thicker intermediate section. Advantageously, the device is dimensioned to satisfy the requirements of ANSI C78.20-2003.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various process operations and arrangements of process operations. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.



FIG. 1 diagrammatically shows, with reference to a conventional incandescent light bulb, a coordinate system that is used herein to describe illumination distributions.



FIG. 2 demonstrates intensity distribution of incandescent lamps at various latitudes.



FIG. 3 diagrammatically shows the lamp of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a side elevation view of an omnidirectional LED-based lamp employing a planar LED-based Lambertian light source and a spherical envelope, and peripheral finned high specularity heat sinking.



FIG. 5 is a side elevation view of an alternative diffuse heat sinking omnidirectional LED-based lamp.



FIG. 6 diagrammatically shows the physical blocking angle at which a thermal heat sink obstructs light emitted from the light source, and the cutoff angle at which acceptable light distribution uniformity is obtained.



FIG. 7 demonstrates terms associated with the geometry of planar fins.



FIG. 8 is a schematic top view of an example lamps using vertical planar fins demonstrating optical light ray paths.



FIG. 9 illustrates light intensity at various latitude angles for the omnidirectional LED-based lamps of FIG. 5.



FIG. 10 illustrates light intensity in varying longitudinal angles 360° around the equator of the lamps of FIGS. 4 and 5.



FIG. 11 illustrates optical modeling data of the light intensity in varying longitudinal angles 360° around an exemplary lamp having 12 heat fins with different surface finishes (specular and diffuse).



FIG. 12 shows optical ray trace modeling data demonstrating the effect of the surface specularity on the intensity distribution of the lamp as a function of latitude angle.



FIGS. 13A-13D illustrate alternative embodiments of thermal heatsink designs employing heat fins adjacent the light source containing envelope.



FIGS. 14C-14F illustrate alternative embodiments of a preferred embodiment with different numbers of surface area enhancing elements adjacent to the light source.



FIG. 15 shows the effect of increasing the number of heat fins on the light intensity distribution in latitude angles for a typical embodiment.



FIG. 16 shows the effect of increasing the thickness of the heat fins on the longitudinal intensity distribution.



FIG. 17 shows optical raytrace modeling data showing the effect of the blocking angle of a heatsink on the design cutoff angle and intensity uniformity.



FIGS. 18A and 18B show embodiments of thermal heatsink designs employing varying length heat fin elements.



FIGS. 19A-19D show embodiments of thermal heatsink designs employing varying number and width of heat fins while maintaining a similar surface area for heat dissipation.



FIGS. 20A and 20B show embodiments of thermal heatsink designs employing varying width heat fin elements.



FIGS. 21A and 21B show embodiments of thermal heatsink designs employing varying thickness heat fin elements.



FIGS. 22A-22D show embodiments of a thermal heatsink design employing surface area enhancing elements in the shape of pins or non-planar fins.



FIGS. 23A and 23B show an embodiment of a thermal heatsink design employing non-vertical surface enhancing elements in the shape of planar fins which are adjacent to the light source at and angle or curvature compared to the optical axis.



FIGS. 24A and 24B show embodiments of thermal heatsink designs around non-spherical envelopes.



FIG. 25 demonstrates the design space created by optical and thermal constraints for a preferred embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The performance of an LED replacement lamp can be quantified by its useful lifetime, as determined by its lumen maintenance and its reliability over time. Whereas incandescent and halogen lamps typically have lifetimes in the range ˜1000 to 5000 hours, LED lamps are capable of >25,000 hours, and perhaps as much as 100,000 hours or more.


The temperature of the p-n junction in the semiconductor material from which the photons are generated is a significant factor in determining the lifetime of an LED lamp. Long lamp life is achieved at junction temperatures of about 100° C. or less, while severely shorter life occurs at about 150° C. or more, with a gradation of lifetime at intermediate temperatures. The power density dissipated in the semiconductor material of a typical high-brightness LED circa year 2009 (˜1 Watt, ˜50-100 lumens, ˜1×1 mm square) is about 100 Watt/cm2. By comparison, the power dissipated in the ceramic envelope of a ceramic metal-halide (CMH) arctube is typically about 20-40 W/cm2. Whereas, the ceramic in a CMH lamp is operated at about 1200-1400 K at its hottest spot, the semiconductor material of the LED device should be operated at about 400 K or less, in spite of having more than 2× higher power density than the CMH lamp. The temperature differential between the hot spot in the lamp and the ambient into which the power must be dissipated is about 1000 K in the case of the CMH, but only about 100 K for the LED lamp. Accordingly, the thermal management must be on the order of ten times more effective for LED lamps than for typical HID lamps.


In designing the heat sink, the limiting thermal impedance in a passively cooled thermal circuit is typically the convective impedance to ambient air (that is, dissipation of heat into the ambient air). This convective impedance is generally proportional to the surface area of the heat sink. In the case of a replacement lamp application, where the LED lamp must fit into the same space as the traditional Edison-type incandescent lamp being replaced, there is a fixed limit on the available amount of surface area exposed to ambient air. Therefore, it is advantageous to use as much of this available surface area as possible for heat dissipation into the ambient, such as placing heat fins or other heat dissipating structures around or adjacent to the light source.


The present embodiment is directed to an integral replacement LED lamp, where the input to the lamp is the main electrical supply, and the output is the desired intensity pattern, preferably with no ancillary electronic or optical components external to the lamp. With reference to FIG. 3, an LED-based lamp 10 includes an LED-based Lambertian light source 12 and a light-transmissive spherical envelope 14. However, it is noted that “spherical” is used herein to describe a generally spherical shape. Furthermore, it is noted that other shapes will provide a similarly useful intensity distribution. Moreover, deviations from spherical are encompassed within this description and in fact, may be preferred in certain embodiments to improve the interaction between diffuser and heat sink. The illustrated light-transmissive spherical envelope 14 preferably has a surface that diffuses light. In some embodiments, the spherical envelope 14 is a glass element, although a diffuser of another light-transmissive material such as plastic or ceramic is also contemplated. The envelope 14 may be inherently light-diffusive, or can be made light-diffusive in various ways, such as: frosting or other texturing to promote light diffusion; coating with a light-diffusive coating such as a Soft-White diffusive coating (available from General Electric Company, New York, USA) of a type used as a light-diffusive coating on the glass bulbs of some incandescent light bulbs; embedding light-scattering particles in the glass, plastic, or other material of the envelope; various combinations thereof; or so forth. However, it is noted that it is also within the scope of the present invention that the envelope be essentially non-diffuse. Moreover, this design parameter is feasible if another light scattering mechanism is employed internal to the envelope.


The envelope 14 optionally may also include a phosphor, for example coated on the envelope surface, to convert the light from the LEDs to another color, for example to convert blue or ultraviolet (UV) light from the LEDs to white light. In some such embodiments, it is contemplated for the phosphor to be the sole component of the diffuser 14. In such embodiments, the phosphor could be a diffusing phosphor. In other contemplated embodiments, the diffuser includes a phosphor plus an additional diffusive element such as frosting, enamel paint, a coating, or so forth, as described above. Alternative, the phosphor can be associated with the LED package.


The LED-based Lambertian light source 12 comprises at least one light emitting diode (LED) device, which in the illustrated embodiment includes a plurality of devices having respective spectra and intensities that mix to render white light of a desired color temperature and CRI. For example, in some embodiments the first LED devices output light having a greenish rendition (achievable, for example, by using a blue- or violet-emitting LED chip that is coated with a suitable “white” phosphor) and the second LED devices output red light (achievable, for example, using a GaAsP or AlGaInP or other epitaxy LED chip that naturally emits red light), and the light from the first and second LED devices blend together to produce improved white rendition. On the other hand, it is also contemplated for the planar LED-based Lambertian light source to comprise a single LED device, which may be a white LED device or a saturated color LED device or so forth. Laser LED devices are also contemplated for incorporation into the lamp.


In one preferred embodiment, the light-transmissive spherical envelope 14 includes an opening sized to receive or mate with the LED-based Lambertian light source 12 such that the light-emissive principle surface of the LED-based Lambertian light source 12 faces into the interior of the spherical envelope 14 and emits light into the interior of the spherical envelope 14. The spherical envelope is large compared with the area of the LED-based Lambertian light source 12. The LED-based Lambertian light source 12 is mounted at or in the opening with its light-emissive surface arranged approximately tangential to the curved surface of the spherical envelope 14.


The LED-based Lambertian light source 12 is mounted to a base 16 which provides heat sinking and space to accommodate electronics. The LED devices are mounted in a planar orientation on a circuit board, which is optionally a metal core printed circuit board (MCPCB). The base element 16 provides support for the LED devices and is thermally conductive (heat sinking). To provide sufficient heat dissipation, the base 16 is in thermal communication with a plurality of thermally conductive fins 18. The fins 18 extend toward the north pole of the lamp φ=0°, adjacent the spherical envelope 14. The fins 18 can be constructed of any thermally conductive material, ones with high thermal conductivity being preferred, easily manufacturable metals or appropriate moldable plastics being more preferred, and cast or aluminum or copper being particularly preferred. Advantageously, it can be seen that the design provides an LED based light source that fits within the ANSI outline for an A-19 incandescent bulb (ANSI C78.20-2003).


Referring now to FIGS. 4-5, an electronic driver is contained in lamp bases 20, 22, with the balance of each base (that is, the portion of each base not occupied by the respective electronics) being made of a heat-sinking material. The electronic driver is sufficient, by itself, to convert the AC power received at the Edison base 23 (for example, 110 volt AC of the type conventionally available at Edison-type lamp sockets in U.S. residential and office locales, or 220 volt AC of the type conventionally available at Edison-type lamp sockets in European residential and office locales) to a form suitable format to drive the LED-based light source. (It is also contemplated to employ another type of electrical connector, such as a bayonet mount of the type sometimes used for incandescent light bulbs in Europe).


The lamps further include extensions comprising fins 24 and 26 that extend over a portion of the spherical envelope 14 to further enhance radiation and convection of heat generated by the LED chips to the ambient environment. Although the fins of FIGS. 4 and 5 are similar, they demonstrate how various designs can accomplish the desired results. Moreover, fins 26 are slightly more elongated than fins 24 and extend deeper into the base 22 and 20, respectively.


The angle of the heatsink base helps maintain a uniform light distribution to high angles (for example, at least 150°). FIG. 6 shows a schematic that defines an angular nomenclature for a typical LED attached to a thermal heatsink. In this example, a diffuser element, 60, is uniformly emitting light. The thermal heatsink, 62, is obstructing the emitted light at an blocking angle, 64, αblock, taken from the optical axis to the point on the heatsink that physically obstructs light coming from the geometric center of the light source, 60. It will be difficult to generate significant intensity at angles smaller than 64, αblock, due to the physical obstruction of the thermal heatsink. In practice, there will be a cutoff angle, 66, αcutoff, at which point the physical obstruction of the thermal heatsink will have minimal effect.



FIG. 17 shows the intensity distribution as a function of latitude angles for varying αblock values. At a latitude angle of 135° (equivalent to an αcutoff of 45°), the normalized intensity for αblock values of 23.6°, 30°, 36.4°, and 42.7° are 79%, 78%, 76%, and 72%, respectively, shown as H, I, J, and K in FIG. 17. This clearly shows that as αblock approaches αcutoff the intensity uniformity is dramatically reduced. For the practical limit of less than 5% reduction in intensity, αblock should be 10-15° less than the desired αcutoff represented by the equation: αcutoffblock+10°. This example at αcutoff of 45° is clearly applicable to other αcutoff angles and other desired reduction levels in intensity. For the case of an A-line like LED lamp, if the cutoff angle is >35°, it will be difficult to have a highly uniform intensity distribution in the latitude angles (forward to backward emitted light). Also, if the cutoff angle is too shallow <15°, there will not be enough room in the rest of the lamp to contain the LED driver electronics and lamp base. An optimal angle of 20-30° is desirable to maintain the light distribution uniformity, while leaving space for the practical elements in the lamp. The present LED lamp provides a uniform output from 0° to at least 120°, preferably 135°, more preferably 150°. This is an excellent replacement for traditional A19 incandescent light bulb.


It is desired to make the base 20, 22 large in order to accommodate the volume of electronics and in order to provide adequate heat sinking, but the base is also preferably configured to minimize the blocking angle, i.e. the latitude angle at which the omnidirectional light distribution is significantly altered by the presence of other lamp components, such as the electronics, heat sink base, and heat sink fins. For example, this angle could be at 135° or a similar angle to provide a uniform light distribution that is similar to present incandescent light sources. These diverse considerations are accommodated in the respective bases 20, 22 by employing a small receiving area for the LED-based light source sections 28, 30 which is sized approximately the same as the LED-based light source, and having sides angled, curved, or otherwise shaped at less than the desired blocking angle, preferably using a truncated cone shape. The sides of the base extend away from the LED-based light source for a distance sufficient to enable the sides to meet with a base portion 32, 34 of a diameter that is large enough to accommodate the electronics, and also mates to an appropriate electrical connection.


The optical properties of the thermal heat sink have a significant effect on the resultant light intensity distribution. When light impinges on a surface, it can be absorbed, transmitted, or reflected. In the case of most engineering materials, they are opaque to visible light, and hence, visible light can be absorbed or reflected from the surface. Concerns of optical efficiency, optical reflectivity, and reflectivity will refer herein to the efficiency and reflectivity of visible light. The absolute reflectivity of the surface will affect the total efficiency of the lamp and also the interference of the heat sink with the intrinsic light intensity distribution of the light source. Though only a small fraction of the light emitted from the light source will impinge a heat sink with heat fins arranged around the light source, if the reflectivity is very low, a large amount of flux will be lost on the heat sink surfaces, and reduce the overall efficiency of the lamp. Similarly, the light intensity distribution is affected by both the redirection of emitted light from the light source and also absorption of flux by the heat sink. If the reflectivity is kept at a high level, such as greater than 70%, the distortions in the light intensity distribution can be minimized. Similarly, the longitudinal and latitudinal intensity distributions can be affected by the surface finish of the thermal heat sink and surface enhancing elements. Smooth surfaces with a high specularity (mirror-like) distort the underlying intensity distribution less than diffuse (Lambertian) surfaces as the light is directed outward along the incident angle rather than perpendicular to the heat sink or heat fin surface.



FIG. 8 shows a top view schematic of a typical lamp embodiment. The source diameter is taken to mean the diameter or other defining maximum dimension of the light transmissive envelope. This will define the relationship between the size of the light emitting region of the lamp and the width or other characteristic dimension of the surface enhancing elements of the thermal heat sink that will be interacting with emitted light. 100% of the emitted flux leaves the light transmissive envelope. Some fraction will interact with the surface area enhancing elements and the thermal heatsink. For the case of planar heat fins, this will be generally defined by the number of heat fins, the radial width of the heat fins, and the diameter of the light transmissive envelope. The overall efficiency will be reduced simply by the product of the fraction of flux that impinges the thermal heat sink and surface area enhancing elements and the optical reflectivity of the heat sink surfaces.


The thermal properties of the heat sink material have a significant effect on the total power that can be dissipated by the lamp system, and the resultant temperature of the LED device and driver electronics. Since the performance and reliability of the LED device and driver electronics is generally limited by operating temperature, it is critical to select a heat sink material with appropriate properties. The thermal conductivity of a material defines the ability of a material to conduct heat. Since an LED device has a very high heat density, a heat sink material for an LED device should preferably have a high thermal conductivity so that the generated heat can be moved quickly away from the LED device. In general, metallic materials have a high thermal conductivity, with common structural metals such as alloy steel, extruded aluminum and copper having thermal conductivities of 50 W/m-K, 170 W/m-K and 390 W/m-K, respectively. A high conductivity material will allow more heat to move from the thermal load to ambient and result in a reduction in temperature rise of the thermal load.


For example, in a typical heat sink embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, dissipating ˜8 W of thermal load, the difference in temperature rise from ambient temperature was ˜8° C. higher for a low thermal conductivity (50 W/m-K) compared to high conductivity (390 W/m-K) material used as a heat. Other material types may also be useful for heat sinking applications. High thermal conductivity plastics, plastic composites, ceramics, ceramic composite materials, nano-materials, such as carbon nanotubes (CNT) or CNT composites with other materials have been demonstrated to possess thermal conductivities within a useful range, and equivalent to or exceeding that of aluminum. Practical considerations, such as manufacturing process or cost may also affect the thermal properties. For example, cast aluminum, which is generally less expensive in large quantities, has a thermal conductivity value approximately half of extruded aluminum. It is preferred for ease and cost of manufacture to use one heat sinking material for the majority of the heat sink, but combinations of cast/extrusion methods of the same material or even incorporating two or more different heat sinking materials into heat sink construction to maximize cooling are obvious to those skilled in the art. The emissivity, or efficiency of radiation in the far infrared region, approximately 5-15 micron, of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum is also an important property for the surfaces of a thermal heat sink. Generally, very shiny metal surfaces have very low emissivity, on the order of 0.0-0.2. Hence, some sort of coating or surface finish may be desirable, such as paints (0.7-0.95) or anodized coatings (0.55-0.85). A high emissivity coating on a heat sink may dissipate approximately 40% more heat than a bare metal surface with a low emissivity. For example, in a typical heat sink embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, dissipating ˜10 W of thermal load, the difference temperature rise from ambient temperature was 15° C. for a low emissivity (0.02) compared to high emissivity (0.92) surface on the heat sink. Selection of a high-emissivity coating must also take into account the optical properties of the coating, as low reflectivity or low specularity can adversely affect the overall efficiency and light distribution of the lamp, as described above.


The fins can laterally extend from “geographic North” 0° to the plane of the cutoff angle, and beyond the cutoff angle to the physical limit of the electronics and lamp base cylinder. Only the fins between “geographic North” 0° to the plane of the cutoff angle will substantially interact optically with the emitted light distribution. Fins below the cutoff angle will have limited interaction. The optical interaction of the fins depends on both the physical dimensions and surface properties of the fins. As shown in FIG. 7, the physical dimensions of the fins that interact with the light distribution can be defined in simple terms of the width, thickness, height, and number of the fins. The width of the fins affect primarily the latitudinal uniformity of the light distribution, the thickness of the fins affect primarily the longitudinal uniformity of the light distribution, the height of the fins affect how much of the latitudinal uniformity is disturbed, and the number of fins primarily determines the total reduction in emitted light due to the latitudinal and longitudinal effects. In general terms, the same fraction of the emitted light should interact with the heat sink at all angles. In functional terms, to maintain the existing light intensity distribution of the source, the surface area in view of the light source created by the width and thickness of the fin should stay in a constant ratio with the surface area of the emitting light surface that they encompass.


To minimize the latitudinal effects, the width of the fins would ideally taper from a maximum at the 90° equator to a minimum at the “geographic North” 0° and to a fractional ratio at the plane of the cutoff angle. Functionally, however, the preferred fin width may be required to vary to meet not only the physical lamp profile of current regulatory limits (ANSI, NEMA, etc.), but for consumer aesthetics or manufacturing constraints as well. Any non-ideal width will negatively effect the latitudinal intensity distribution and subsequent Illuminance distribution.


Substantially planar heat fins by design are usually thin to maximize surface area, and so have substantially limited extent in the longitudinal direction, i.e. the thickness. In other words, each fin lies substantially in a plane and hence does not substantially adversely impact the omnidirectional nature of the longitudinal intensity distribution. A ratio of latitudinal circumference of the light source to the maximum individual fin thickness equal to 8:1 or greater is preferred. To further maximize surface area, the number of fins can be increased. The maximum number of fins while following the previous preferred ratio of fin thickness is generally limited by the reduction in optical efficiency and intensity levels at angles adjacent to the south pole due to absorption and redirection of light by the surfaces of the heat fins. FIG. 15 shows the effect of increasing the number of fins in a nominal design on the intensity uniformity in the latitude angles. For example, at an angle of 135° from the north pole, 0°, the intensity is 79%, 75%, and 71% of the average intensity from 0-135° for 8, 12, and 16 heat fins, respectively. This is shown for fins with 90% optical reflectivity, and 50% specular surfaces. Increasing the number of fins in this case also reduces the overall optical efficiency by ˜3% for each 4 fin increase. This effect is also multiplied by the inherent reflectance of the heat sink surfaces.


As stated earlier, the fins are provided for heat sinking. To provide some light along the upward optical axis, they will typically have thin end sections with a relatively thicker intermediate section. Also critically important to maintaining a uniform light intensity distribution is the surface finish of the heat sink. A range of surface finishes, varying from a specular (reflective) to a diffuse (Lambertian) surface can be selected. The specular designs can be a reflective base material or an applied high-specularity coating. The diffuse surface can be a finish on the base heat sink material, or an applied paint or other diffuse coating. Each provides certain advantages and disadvantages. For example, a highly reflective surface the ability to maintain the light intensity distribution, but may be thermally disadvantageous due to the generally lower emissivity of bare metal surfaces. In addition, highly specular surfaces may be difficult to maintain over the life of a LED lamp, which is typically 25,000-50,000 hours. Alternatively, a heat sink with a diffuse surface will have a reduced light intensity distribution uniformity than a comparable specular surface. However the maintenance of the surface will be more robust over the life of a typical LED lamp, and also provide a visual appearance that is similar to existing incandescent omnidirectional light sources. A diffuse finish will also likely have an increased emissivity compared to a specular surface which will increase the heat dissipation capacity of the heat sink, as described above. Preferably, the coating will possess a high specularity surface and also a high emissivity, examples of which would be high specularity paints, or high emissivity coatings over a high specularity finish or coating.


It is desirable that the heat from the LEDs is dissipated to keep the junction temperatures of the LED low enough to ensure long-life. Surprisingly, placing a plurality of thin heat fins around the emitting light source itself does not significantly disturb the uniform light intensity in the longitudinal angles. Referring to FIG. 16, the effect of varying thickness heat fins on the longitudinal intensity distribution at the lamp equator is shown. This embodiment possessed 8 fins with an 80% optical reflectivity, diffuse surface finish, and 40 mm diameter of light emitting envelope. The magnitude of the distortion of the uniform intensity distribution can be characterized by the minimum to maximum peak distances. For the case of a 0.5 mm thick heat fin, the distortion is only ±2%, while at 6.5 mm thickness, the distortion is ±9%. Intermediate values provide intermediate results. In addition, the overall optical efficiency is also reduced as the fin thickness increases as a larger amount of flux from the light source is impingent on the thermal heat sink, varying from 93% at 0.5 mm fin thickness to 76% at 6.5 mm. Again, intermediate values produce intermediate results. At a desired level of distortion is less than ±5%, the light source diameter to the fin thickness must be kept above a ratio of approximately 8:1. Also, a desired level of overall optical efficiency must be selected, commonly greater than 80%, preferably greater than 90%, that will also constrain the desired fin thickness. For example, in an A19 embodiment, the heat fins are kept to a maximum thickness such as less than 5.0, preferably less than 3.5 millimeters, and most preferably between 1.0 and 2.5 millimeters to avoid blocking light, while still providing the correct surface area and cross-sectional area for heat dissipation. A minimum thickness may be desired for specific fabrication techniques, such as machining, casting, injection molding, or other techniques known in the industry. The shape is preferably tapered around the light source, with its smallest width at 0° (above lamp) as not to completely block emitted light. The heat fins will start at the heat sink base and extend to some point below 0°, above the lamp, to avoid blocking light along the optical axis, while providing enough surface area to dissipate the desired amount of heat from the LED light source. The design can incorporate either a small number of large width heat fins or a large number of smaller ones, to satisfy thermal requirements. The number of heat fins will generally be determined by the required heat fin surface area needed to dissipate the heat generated by the LED light source and electronic components in the lamp. For example, a 60 W incandescent replacement LED lamp may consume roughly 10 W of power, approximately 80% of which must be dissipated by the heat sink to keep the LED and electronic components at a low enough temperature to ensure a long life product.


High reflectance (>70%) heatsink surfaces are desired. Fully absorbing heatsink (0% reflective) surfaces can absorb approx. 30% of the emitted light in a nominal design, while approx. 1% is blocked if the fins have 80-90% reflectance. As there are often multiple bounces between LED light source, optical materials, phosphors, envelopes, and thermal heat sink materials in an LED lamp, the reflectivity has a multiplicative effect on the overall optical efficiency of the lamp. The heat sink surface specularity can also be advantageous. Specular surfaces smooth the peaks in the longitudinal intensity distribution created by having heat fins near the spherical diffuser, while the peaks are stronger with diffuse surfaces even at the same overall efficiency. Peaks of approximately ±5% due to heat fin interference present in a diffuse surface finish heat sink can be completely removed by using a specular heat sink. If the distortions in the longitudinal light intensity distribution are kept below ˜10% (±5%), the human eye will perceive a uniform light distribution. Similarly, the intensity distribution in latitude angles is benefited. 5-10% of the average intensity can be gained at angles below the lamp (for example, from 135-150°) by using specular surfaces over diffuse.


Referring now to FIG. 10, the surprisingly limited impact of the fins on the longitudinal light intensity distribution of the lamp is demonstrated. In this case, the designs consisted of a thermal heat sink with 8 vertical planar fins with a thickness of 1.5 mm., and either diffuse or specular surface finish. The fins in both designs possess a ratio of radial width “W” to light emitting envelope diameter of ˜1:4. These embodiments are graphically represented in FIGS. 4 and 5. Clearly, the variation in light intensity at θ=90° was minimal throughout φ=0-360° for both diffuse and specular fins, with ±5% variation, shown at E, in measured intensity for the diffuse heat fins, and less than ±2% using specular heat fins. This illustrates the advantages of placing appropriately dimensioned surface area enhancing elements around or adjacent to the light source to gain surface area without disturbing the longitudinal light intensity distribution. Furthermore, the advantage of a substantially specular surface finish compared to a diffuse surface is demonstrated in practice. The deep reduction in intensity at F, is an artifact from the measurement system.



FIG. 11 demonstrates optical modeling results for a typical 8 fin lamp design. Both perfectly specular and diffuse fin surfaces were evaluated. The intensity distribution of each was evaluated in the longitudinal angles from 0-360° around the lamps equator using optical raytrace modeling. Diffuse fins showed approximately a ±4% variation in intensity, while specular surfaces showed virtually no variation. Either would provide a uniform light distribution, while a clear preference is seen for surfaces with a specular or near-specular finish.


Referring now to FIG. 12, the benefits of using a specular surface finish on thermal heat sink regions that interact with light emitted from a typical LED lamp are demonstrated for the uniformity of the light intensity distribution in latitude angles. The intensity level at angles adjacent to the south pole (in this example, 135°, identified with arrows) is shown to be 23% higher for a specular surface compared to a diffuse surface when compared to the average intensity from 0-135°. Also shown is the intensity distribution for a 50% specular and 50% diffuse surface that captures approximately half the benefit of a fully specular surface in average intensity. The effect of the specularity of the surface cannot be understated as it has a dual effect benefiting the uniformity of the light intensity distribution. Point G on the graph defines a point that will be referred to as the ‘pivot’ point of the intensity distribution, which is nominally located in the equator of this design. As the specularity of the heat sink surfaces increases, the intensity to the north of the pivot decrease, and to the right of the pivot, increase. This reduces the average intensity as well as increasing the southward angle at which uniformity is achieved. This is critical to generating a uniform intensity distribution down to the highest angle possible adjacent to the south pole.


Referring again to FIG. 8, the effectiveness of the present lamp design is illustrated. Moreover, it is demonstrated by light ray tracing that the fins, if provided with a specular (FIG. 2) or diffuse (FIG. 3) surface effectively direct light. Moreover, it can be seen that high overall optical efficiencies are obtainable when high reflectance heat sink materials or coatings are used in a lamp embodiment. Since only a fraction (˜⅓) of the light emitted by the diffuse LED light source is impingent on the heat sink surface, a high reflectivity heat sink surface will only absorb a small percentage (<5%) of the overall flux emitted from the diffuse LED light source.


Referring to FIG. 9, it can be seen that the present design (FIG. 5) provides adequate light intensity adjacent its south pole. The dashed lines on the figure show the intensity of the measured data at both 135° and 150° that are useful angles to characterize the omnidirectional nature of the light intensity distribution. Moreover, there is no more than a ±10% variation in average intensity from 0 to 135° viewing angles, which would meet or exceed several separate possible light intensity uniformity requirements. It would exceed the U.S. DoE Energy Star proposed draft 2 specification (±20% at 135°), and equivalency with the performance of standard Soft White incandescent lamps (±16% at 135°), which are the current preferred omnidirectional light source available. At a 150° viewing angle, the ±20% variation would exceed the to the performance of standard Soft White incandescent lamps, and nearly meet the U.S. DoE Bright Tomorrow Lighting Prize (±10% at 150°). FIG. 9 demonstrates the effectiveness of the present lamp design to achieve this result.



FIGS. 13a-d. demonstrates another preferred fin and envelope design within the scope of the present disclosure. FIG. 13a shows an embodiment where vertical heat fins surround a substantially spherical light emitting diffuser. The heat fins are tapered towards geographic north and provide a preferred light intensity distribution. FIG. 13b shows an embodiment where the vertical heat fins extend only to the equator of a light-transmissive envelope. This provides the additional benefit of ease of assembly and manufacture as the LED light source and envelope can be easily inserted from the top (geographic north) of the heat sink and are not completely encompassed by the heat sink as in FIG. 13a. FIG. 13c shows a light-transmissive envelope with vertical heat fins that encompass an even smaller portion of the light-emitting region. FIG. 13d demonstrates a combination of FIGS. 13a and 13b where additional surface area is gained by extending the vertical heat fins past the equator but at a tangent to the equator so the assembly and manufacturing benefits of FIG. 13b are retained. Additionally, FIGS. 13b and 13c demonstrate the application of the surface area enhancing elements around various envelope and light source shapes.



FIGS. 14a-f. demonstrates the effects of adding additional surface area enhancing elements within the scope of the present disclosure. FIGS. 14a and 14d show side and top views of a typical lamp embodiment possessing 8 vertical planar heat fins. FIGS. 14b and 14e show side and top views of a typical lamp embodiment possessing 12 vertical planar heat fins. FIGS. 14c and 14f show side and top views of a typical lamp embodiment possessing 16 vertical planar heat fins. Clearly, the heat dissipating capacity of the designs using higher numbers of fins is enhanced by the increased surface area exposed to the ambient environment, at the cost of light intensity uniformity in the latitude angles, as previously shown and discussed in FIG. 15. One particularly useful embodiment may be to alter the number of fins for aesthetic or manufacturing concerns is to move the heat fin orientation from purely vertical to an angle, θ, away from the optical axis. Given that the heat fins would have the same vertical height, they would possess a factor of 1/cos θ greater surface area than the purely vertical fins. In this case, the number of fins could be reduced by a factor of 1/cos(θ) and the system would possess approximately the same thermal and optical performance.



FIGS. 18a-b. demonstrate alternate embodiments of surface area enhancing elements of different lengths. To achieve the desired level of heat dissipation, heat fins of different vertical lengths and shape may be employed. For example, FIG. 18a shows two shape and length heat fins, where the shorter one has a tapered shape that is designed to minimize the interference with the light intensity distribution by possessing a proportionate surface area with the light-emitting area of the lamp. This provides additional surface area for heat dissipation without significant interference with the light intensity distribution. FIG. 18b. demonstrates another method to increase surface area without substantially decreasing the light intensity uniformity. If the additional shorter length heat fins are added below αcutoff (see FIG. 6 for reference), the impact on the intensity distribution will be minimal but surface area will be added to the heat sink.



FIGS. 19a-d. demonstrate alternate embodiments of a typical lamp embodiment with similar surface area but different employment of surface area enhancing elements. FIGS. 19a. and 19c. show a side and top view of a typical embodiment possessing 16 vertical planar fins with a radial width of approximately ⅙ of the light emitting envelope diameter. FIGS. 19b. and 19d. show the side and top view of a typical lamp embodiment possessing 8 vertical planar fins with a radial width of approximately ⅓ of the light emitting envelope. It is clear that the surface area of the heat fins, and proportionally thermal dissipation and optical efficiency is equivalent in both cases. Larger or smaller numbers of fins may be desired for aesthetic, manufacturing, or other practical concerns. It is also demonstrated that a large number of smaller width fins may provide more internal volume for heat sink, electronics, light source, and optical elements within a constrained geometry, such as an incandescent replacement lamp application.



FIGS. 20a-b. demonstrate side view and top view of a typical lamp embodiment employing a combination of different widths of vertical planar heat fins.



FIGS. 21a-b. demonstrate a side view and top view of a typical lamp embodiment employing a heat fins with varying thickness along their radial width. Certain manufacturing techniques, such as casting, machining, or injection molding, or others, may be benefited by having draft angles as shown. Since the surface area of planar fins is mainly driven by the radial width of the fin, tapering of the thickness will have minimal impact on thermal dissipation, optical efficiency or light intensity distribution.



FIG. 22 demonstrates a side and top views of lamp embodiments employing pins and non-planar fins versus a solid fin. The pins allow a greater surface area to occupy the same equivalent volume as a fin, and also aid in convective heat flow through the heat sink fin volume. Similar benefits can be achieved with holes or slots through a solid fin, but such methods can be difficult to manufacture, especially with some metal casting techniques. Similarly, bar-like, oval or structures with more elongated cross-sectional aspect ratios, greater than pins but less than sheets or planar structures would also be useful in this application.



FIG. 23 demonstrates a side view and top view of a lamp embodiment of thermal heatsink design employing curved fins. Fins can be curved in either direction from the vertical axis. For the same number of fins, curved fins will have increased surface area versus purely vertical fins. The physical dimensions (thickness, width, height) of the curved fins will impact both the latitudinal and longitudinal distributions of light since they will occupy both vertical and horizontal space and not be exclusively planar as with previous embodiments with vertical fins.



FIG. 24 demonstrates both prolate (FIGS. 24a. and c.) and oblate (FIGS. 24b. and d.) ellipsoids shaped light-transmissive envelopes surrounded by heat fins. Variations encompassing within and external to this range of non-spherical envelopes are assumed.


For most table lamps or decorative bathroom/chandelier lighting ambient temperature is considered to be 25° C., but ambient temperatures of 40° C. and above are possible, especially in enclosed luminaries or in ceiling use. Even with a rise in ambient, the junction temperature (Tjunction) of an LED lamp should be kept below 100° C. for acceptable performance. For all LEDs there is a thermal resistance between the thermal pad temperature (Tpad) and the Tjunction, usually on the order of 5° C.˜15° C. Since ideally the Tjunction temperature is desired to be less than 100° C., the Tpad temperature is desired to be less than 85° C. Referring now to FIG. 25, the LED pad temperature (Tpad) and optical transmission efficiency for a 10 W LED lamp (8 W dissipated thermal load) are shown for a 40° C. ambient air condition. Also, a substantially uniform light intensity distribution with high optical efficiency (low absorbtion) is desired. To maintain a high lamp efficiency, it is generally desired that the optical efficiency is maximized for a given design, preferably greater than 80%, more preferably greater than 90%. Light intensity uniformity can be defined as a deviation from the average intensity at some angle adjacent to the south pole, preferably ±20% at 135° for an omnidirectional lamp. The preferred embodiment fin shapes utilized for FIG. 25 are shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. Heat fin thickness is varied from 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm, and the number of heat fins is varied from 8 to 16 and the thermal and optical responses are measured. Heatsink surface reflectivity is maintained at 85%, average for bare aluminum, and the specularity of the surface is maintained at 75%. As fin thickness and number of fins increases, Tpad is advantageously decreased, and optical transmission efficiency is disadvantageously decreased. Conversely, as fin thickness and number of fins is decreased, Tpad is increased, and optical transmission efficiency is advantageously increased. For this embodiment, the surface area of the truncated cone and cylinder without any fins is −37 cm2. Each pair of fins as shown in FIG. 4 or 5 adds roughly ˜27 to 30 cm2 of fin surface area, while reducing the cone/cylinder surface area by ˜1 to 2 cm2 where the fins attach. From a baseline case of no fins whatsoever, to a nominal case of 8 fins with a thickness of 1.5 mm, an enhanced surface area of 4× (˜148 cm2 versus ˜37 cm2) is provided that provides an increased thermal dissipation capacity and enables a Tpad temperature of ˜80° C. while maintaining an optical transmission efficiency of greater than 90%. Referring to FIG. 25, a preferred region of operation for this embodiment is bounded by a Tpad temperature of <85° C. and an optical transmission efficiency of >90%. This region has an enhanced surface area of at least 2× that provides an increased thermal dissipation capacity of the heat sink. Also shown is a bounding line for the intensity uniformity at 80%. Clearly, for other lamp embodiments different bounds can be set for Tpad temperature, optical transmission efficiency, or intensity uniformity based on a specific application that will either restrict or widen the preferred region. Though exact dimensions and physical limits can vary, the tradeoff between thermal design parameters and optical design parameters will compete to define the acceptable design limits.


The preferred embodiments have been illustrated and described. Obviously, modifications, alterations, and combinations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A lamp comprising a light transmissive envelope; a solid state light source illuminating the interior of the light transmissive envelope; said light source in thermal communication with a base said base having a first end terminating adjacent a perimeter of said light transmissive envelope and receiving the solid state light source; said apparatus having a longitudinal axis dissecting said envelope and base element and wherein said base has a light blocking angle of between 0° and 45° as measured from said longitudinal axis at a point of exit from said light transmissive envelope.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said light blocking angle extends 360° around a horizontal axis of said device.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said light blocking components include at least a heat sink, electronics, and an electrical connector.
  • 4. A solid state lighting device comprising a base end;a light transmissive envelope;at least one solid state emitter; anda heatsink disposed between the base end and the at least one solid state emitter, and arranged to dissipate heat generated by the at least one solid state emitter;wherein:the heatsink has a first end external and adjacent to the envelope, having a first width at the first end;the heatsink has a second end having a second width at the second end;the second width being greater than the first width; andat least a portion of the heatsink disposed between the first end and the second end has a third width that is greater than the first width and the second width.
  • 5. The lighting device of claim 4 wherein said second end comprises an electrical connector.
  • 6. A solid state lighting device comprising: a base end; at least one solid state emitter; and a heatsink disposed between the base and the at least one solid state emitter, and arranged to dissipate heat generated by the at least one solid state emitter; said heatsink including a plurality of fins overlying a light transmissive envelope and extending from a heatsink side of the envelope to a remote side of the envelope; wherein the lighting device has a substantially central axis extending in a direction between the base end and an emitter mounting area in which the at least one solid state emitter is mounted; wherein the heatsink is arranged to permit unobstructed emission of light generated by the at least one solid state emitter according to each latitude angle of greater than 135 degrees relative to the central axis around an entire lateral perimeter of the solid state lighting device.
  • 7. The solid state lighting device of claim 6, wherein the at least one solid state emitter is disposed under or within a light transmissive envelope.
  • 8. The solid state lighting device of claim 6, wherein the plurality of fins are in optical communication with light emitted by said at least one solid state emitter that exits the light transmissive envelope such that said light is at least substantially reflected by said fins.
  • 9. The solid state lighting device of claim 6, wherein the heatsink is adapted to dissipate a thermal load generated by a 10 w LED lamp or greater in an ambient air environment of about 40° C. while maintaining a junction temperature of the at least one solid state emitter at or below about 85° C.
  • 10. The solid state lighting device of claim 6, being sized and shaped in accordance with ANSI Standard C.78.20-2003.
  • 11. A lamp or light fixture comprising the solid state lighting device of claim 6.
US Referenced Citations (454)
Number Name Date Kind
1500912 Williams Jul 1924 A
1811782 Duncan, Jr. Jun 1931 A
3180981 Ulffers Apr 1965 A
3341689 Reichenbach Sep 1967 A
4042522 Falk Aug 1977 A
4107238 Roper et al. Aug 1978 A
4120565 Rabl et al. Oct 1978 A
4141941 Travnicek Feb 1979 A
4211955 Ray Jul 1980 A
4320268 Brown Mar 1982 A
4337506 Terada Jun 1982 A
4388678 Turner Jun 1983 A
4506316 Thiry et al. Mar 1985 A
4562018 Neefe Dec 1985 A
4727289 Uchida Feb 1988 A
4803394 Holten Feb 1989 A
4826424 Arai et al. May 1989 A
4918497 Edmond Apr 1990 A
4933822 Nakamats Jun 1990 A
4966862 Edmond Oct 1990 A
4972308 Chen Nov 1990 A
4988911 Miller Jan 1991 A
4992704 Stinson Feb 1991 A
5027168 Edmond Jun 1991 A
5087949 Haitz Feb 1992 A
5093576 Edmond et al. Mar 1992 A
5110278 Tait et al. May 1992 A
5134550 Young Jul 1992 A
5140220 Hasegawa Aug 1992 A
5143660 Hamilton et al. Sep 1992 A
5210051 Carter, Jr. May 1993 A
5217600 Le Jun 1993 A
5277840 Osaka et al. Jan 1994 A
5335157 Lyons Aug 1994 A
5338944 Edmond et al. Aug 1994 A
5374668 Kanemura et al. Dec 1994 A
5393993 Edmond et al. Feb 1995 A
5405251 Sipin Apr 1995 A
5416342 Edmond et al. May 1995 A
5416683 McCarthy May 1995 A
5477430 Larose Dec 1995 A
5523589 Edmond et al. Jun 1996 A
5526455 Akita et al. Jun 1996 A
5535230 Abe Jul 1996 A
5561346 Byrne Oct 1996 A
5575550 Appeldorn et al. Nov 1996 A
5581683 Bertignoll et al. Dec 1996 A
5604135 Edmond et al. Feb 1997 A
5632551 Roney et al. May 1997 A
5660461 Ignatius et al. Aug 1997 A
5667297 Maassen Sep 1997 A
5669486 Shima Sep 1997 A
5688042 Madadi et al. Nov 1997 A
5739554 Edmond et al. Apr 1998 A
5753730 Nagata et al. May 1998 A
5812717 Gilliland Sep 1998 A
5813753 Vriens et al. Sep 1998 A
5850126 Kanbar Dec 1998 A
5851063 Doughty et al. Dec 1998 A
5858227 Stone et al. Jan 1999 A
5882553 Prophet et al. Mar 1999 A
5899557 McDermott May 1999 A
5906425 Gordin et al. May 1999 A
5906429 Mori et al. May 1999 A
5912477 Negley Jun 1999 A
5931570 Yamuro Aug 1999 A
5956106 Petersen et al. Sep 1999 A
5959316 Lowery Sep 1999 A
5962971 Chen Oct 1999 A
5968422 Kennedy Oct 1999 A
6066861 Hoehn et al. May 2000 A
6069440 Shimizu et al. May 2000 A
6141034 McCutchen Oct 2000 A
6142652 Richardson Nov 2000 A
6155699 Miller et al. Dec 2000 A
6156242 Saito et al. Dec 2000 A
6177688 Linthicum et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187606 Edmond et al. Feb 2001 B1
6204523 Carey et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218785 Incerti Apr 2001 B1
6218790 Jansa et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222207 Carter-Coman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227679 Zhang May 2001 B1
6227683 Tukia May 2001 B1
6234648 Boerner et al. May 2001 B1
6252254 Soules et al. Jun 2001 B1
6270236 Brussog Aug 2001 B1
6274890 Oshio et al. Aug 2001 B1
6294800 Duggal et al. Sep 2001 B1
6305821 Hsieh et al. Oct 2001 B1
6329676 Takayama et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335548 Roberts et al. Jan 2002 B1
6340824 Komoto et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345903 Koike et al. Feb 2002 B1
6346973 Shibamoto et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350041 Tarsa et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351069 Lowery et al. Feb 2002 B1
6373188 Johnson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383417 Paulson et al. May 2002 B1
6391231 Evans et al. May 2002 B1
6404112 Frings et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404125 Garbuzov et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404131 Kawano et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410940 Jiang et al. Jun 2002 B1
6429583 Levinson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6465961 Cao Oct 2002 B1
6472765 Sano et al. Oct 2002 B1
6495961 Cao Oct 2002 B1
6498355 Harrah et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504171 Grillot et al. Jan 2003 B1
6504301 Lowery Jan 2003 B1
6517213 Fujita et al. Feb 2003 B1
6521915 Odaki et al. Feb 2003 B2
6522065 Srivastava et al. Feb 2003 B1
6536914 Hoelen et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538371 Duggal et al. Mar 2003 B1
6541800 Barnett et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547416 Pashley et al. Apr 2003 B2
6573653 Ishinaga Jun 2003 B1
6576930 Reeh et al. Jun 2003 B2
6578986 Swaris et al. Jun 2003 B2
6600175 Baretz et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601984 Yamamoto et al. Aug 2003 B2
6609813 Showers et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610563 Waitl et al. Aug 2003 B1
6614103 Durocher et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621211 Srivastava et al. Sep 2003 B1
6626557 Taylor Sep 2003 B1
6634770 Cao Oct 2003 B2
6635987 Wojnarowski et al. Oct 2003 B1
6642618 Yagi et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657379 Ellens et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660175 Kawamura et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661167 Eliashevich et al. Dec 2003 B2
6670748 Ellens et al. Dec 2003 B2
6674233 Ellens et al. Jan 2004 B2
6680569 Mueller-Mach et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683325 Waitl et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685852 Setlur et al. Feb 2004 B2
6709132 Ishibashi Mar 2004 B2
6717353 Mueller et al. Apr 2004 B1
6719446 Cao Apr 2004 B2
6720584 Hata et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730939 Hata et al. Apr 2004 B2
6734465 Taskar et al. May 2004 B1
6744077 Trottier et al. Jun 2004 B2
6746885 Cao Jun 2004 B2
6767111 Lai Jul 2004 B1
6796680 Showers et al. Sep 2004 B1
6809347 Tasch et al. Oct 2004 B2
6812503 Lin et al. Nov 2004 B2
6814470 Rizkin et al. Nov 2004 B2
6817783 Lee et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833565 Su et al. Dec 2004 B2
6841804 Chen et al. Jan 2005 B1
6841933 Yamanaka et al. Jan 2005 B2
6844903 Mueller-Mach et al. Jan 2005 B2
6864513 Lin et al. Mar 2005 B2
6871981 Alexanderson et al. Mar 2005 B2
6917057 Stokes et al. Jul 2005 B2
D508575 Buschmann et al. Aug 2005 S
6932496 Rizkin et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936855 Harrah Aug 2005 B1
6936857 Doxsee et al. Aug 2005 B2
6960878 Sakano et al. Nov 2005 B2
7005679 Tarsa et al. Feb 2006 B2
7011432 Chen et al. Mar 2006 B2
7029935 Negley et al. Apr 2006 B2
7040774 Beeson et al. May 2006 B2
7055987 Staufert Jun 2006 B2
7079367 Liljestrand Jul 2006 B1
7086756 Maxik Aug 2006 B2
7094367 Harmon et al. Aug 2006 B1
D528227 Chou et al. Sep 2006 S
7101061 Nagai et al. Sep 2006 B2
D531741 Takahashi Nov 2006 S
7144131 Rains Dec 2006 B2
7144140 Sun et al. Dec 2006 B2
D534665 Egawa et al. Jan 2007 S
7161311 Mueller et al. Jan 2007 B2
7161313 Piepgras et al. Jan 2007 B2
D538953 Mama Mar 2007 S
7196459 Morris Mar 2007 B2
D541440 Feit Apr 2007 S
7204615 Arik et al. Apr 2007 B2
7223000 Yamamura May 2007 B2
7224001 Cao May 2007 B2
7229196 Hulse Jun 2007 B2
7246919 Porchia et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252409 Kim Aug 2007 B2
7258464 Morris et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273300 Mrakovich Sep 2007 B2
D553267 Yuen Oct 2007 S
7284882 Burkholder Oct 2007 B2
7303315 Ouderkirk et al. Dec 2007 B2
7304694 Negley et al. Dec 2007 B2
D560286 Maxik Jan 2008 S
7314291 Tain et al. Jan 2008 B2
7352339 Morgan et al. Apr 2008 B2
D570504 Maxik Jun 2008 S
D570505 Maxik Jun 2008 S
7396146 Wang Jul 2008 B2
7413325 Chen Aug 2008 B2
7434964 Zheng et al. Oct 2008 B1
7453195 Radkov et al. Nov 2008 B2
7479516 Chen et al. Jan 2009 B2
7479662 Soules et al. Jan 2009 B2
7494246 Harbers et al. Feb 2009 B2
D590523 Takahashi Apr 2009 S
7524089 Park Apr 2009 B2
7547124 Chang et al. Jun 2009 B2
7549772 Wang Jun 2009 B2
7553037 Sullivan Jun 2009 B2
7569425 Huang et al. Aug 2009 B2
7572033 Sun et al. Aug 2009 B2
7581856 Kang et al. Sep 2009 B2
7585090 Wu Sep 2009 B2
7588351 Meyer Sep 2009 B2
7600882 Morejon et al. Oct 2009 B1
7614759 Negley Nov 2009 B2
7637639 Epstein Dec 2009 B2
D613887 Lee Apr 2010 S
D615220 Crane et al. May 2010 S
7736020 Baroky et al. Jun 2010 B2
7748870 Chang et al. Jul 2010 B2
7760499 Darbin et al. Jul 2010 B1
7768189 Radkov Aug 2010 B2
7784972 Heffington et al. Aug 2010 B2
7800909 Sun Sep 2010 B2
7837363 Liu Nov 2010 B2
D629153 Chen Dec 2010 S
7932535 Mahalingam et al. Apr 2011 B2
8030886 Mahalingam et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035966 Reichenbach et al. Oct 2011 B2
8057071 He et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057075 Horng et al. Nov 2011 B2
8066410 Booth et al. Nov 2011 B2
D653365 Yuan et al. Jan 2012 S
8094393 Minano et al. Jan 2012 B2
8115395 Horng et al. Feb 2012 B2
8125126 Lin et al. Feb 2012 B2
8136576 Grimm Mar 2012 B2
8152318 Richardson Apr 2012 B2
D660991 Allen et al. May 2012 S
8227961 van de Ven Jul 2012 B2
8227968 Kaandorp et al. Jul 2012 B2
8246202 Mart et al. Aug 2012 B2
8282249 Liang et al. Oct 2012 B2
8297797 Kim et al. Oct 2012 B2
8299691 Grimm Oct 2012 B2
8314537 Gielen et al. Nov 2012 B2
8319408 Horng Nov 2012 B1
8324790 Hu Dec 2012 B1
8390182 Yu Mar 2013 B2
8414160 Sun et al. Apr 2013 B2
8444299 Chou et al. May 2013 B2
8541932 Horng Sep 2013 B2
8562161 Tong et al. Sep 2013 B2
8602607 Arik et al. Dec 2013 B2
8608341 Boomgaarden et al. Dec 2013 B2
8616714 Lee et al. Dec 2013 B2
8845138 Booth et al. Sep 2014 B2
8882284 Tong et al. Nov 2014 B2
9523488 Le et al. Dec 2016 B2
20010009510 Lodhie Jul 2001 A1
20010045573 Waitl et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020043926 Takahashi et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020063520 Yu et al. May 2002 A1
20020070643 Yeh Jun 2002 A1
20020079837 Okazaki Jun 2002 A1
20020080501 Kawae et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020084745 Wang et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020084748 Ayala et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020093820 Pederson Jul 2002 A1
20020117676 Katoh Aug 2002 A1
20020123164 Slater, Jr. et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020163006 Yoganandan et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020172354 Nishi Nov 2002 A1
20020196638 Stephens et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030021117 Chan Jan 2003 A1
20030039120 Cao Feb 2003 A1
20030057829 Ellens et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030067008 Srivastava et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030067264 Takekuma Apr 2003 A1
20030090910 Chen May 2003 A1
20030117770 Montgomery et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030141563 Wang Jul 2003 A1
20030146690 Ellens et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030198021 Freedman Oct 2003 A1
20030210555 Cicero et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030214616 Komoto et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040000862 Setlur et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040000867 Chen Jan 2004 A1
20040012027 Keller et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040052077 Shih Mar 2004 A1
20040056256 Bokor et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040066142 Stimac et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040070001 Lee et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040097635 Fan et al. May 2004 A1
20040136193 Wu Liu Jul 2004 A1
20040170864 Liu Sep 2004 A1
20040174651 Aisenbrey Sep 2004 A1
20040177947 Krassowski et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040190304 Sugimoto et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040207998 Suehiro et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040227149 Ibbetson et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040228131 Minano et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040256630 Cao Dec 2004 A1
20040257797 Suehiro et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264197 Bewig et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050007772 Yen Jan 2005 A1
20050029927 Setlur et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050068776 Ge Mar 2005 A1
20050073244 Chou et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093430 Ibbetson et al. May 2005 A1
20050110384 Peterson May 2005 A1
20050116336 Chopra et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050116597 Hsu Jun 2005 A1
20050127378 Suehiro et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050224829 Negley Oct 2005 A1
20050227388 Setlur et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050253533 Lys et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050265035 Brass et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060012991 Weaver, Jr. et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060034077 Chang Feb 2006 A1
20060050514 Opolka Mar 2006 A1
20060054915 Chang Mar 2006 A1
20060066209 Chau Mar 2006 A1
20060092640 Li May 2006 A1
20060092641 Phelan et al. May 2006 A1
20060098440 Allen May 2006 A1
20060139744 Mehrtens et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060187653 Olsson Aug 2006 A1
20060193130 Ishibash Aug 2006 A1
20060193132 Kim et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060198147 Ge Sep 2006 A1
20060215422 Laizure, Jr. Sep 2006 A1
20060227558 Osawa Oct 2006 A1
20060232974 Lee Oct 2006 A1
20060255347 Denbaars et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070030666 Cohen Feb 2007 A1
20070120135 Soules May 2007 A1
20070132366 Yabe et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070147046 Arik et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070159091 Hirosaki et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070161135 Wang Jul 2007 A1
20070165411 Abdelsamed Jul 2007 A1
20070189010 Arai Aug 2007 A1
20070235751 Radkov et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070263405 Ng et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080007953 Keller et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080009187 Grimm et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080049445 Harbers et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080062703 Cao Mar 2008 A1
20080074871 Meis et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080079017 Loh Apr 2008 A1
20080123349 Chaves et al. May 2008 A1
20080130285 Negley Jun 2008 A1
20080192480 Rizkin et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080198603 Sormani et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080213578 Endo et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080239202 Won et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266893 Speier Oct 2008 A1
20080285270 Chiang Nov 2008 A1
20080307646 Zaderej et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080318049 Hata et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090016062 Lee et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090057699 Basin et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090059591 Nakamura et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090084866 Grimm et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090086478 Sanroma et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103293 Harbers et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090103296 Harbers et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090129102 Xiao May 2009 A1
20090148320 Lucas et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090167192 Diederiks et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090175041 Yuen Jul 2009 A1
20090195186 Guest Aug 2009 A1
20090225430 Barnes et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090262545 Amelung et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090267474 Zhou et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090273925 Schultz et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090279314 Wu et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090295265 Tabuchi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090296387 Reisenauer et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090302730 Carroll et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090303735 Chen Dec 2009 A1
20090310368 Incerti et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100002432 Romano Jan 2010 A1
20100018686 Bontemps et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100053963 Yang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100072506 Bae et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100103666 Chang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100118495 Janssen et al. May 2010 A1
20100123397 Tian May 2010 A1
20100156325 Nelson Jun 2010 A1
20100170657 Kaslusky Jul 2010 A1
20100207502 Cao et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100289396 Osawa et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110018417 Lai et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110063800 Park Mar 2011 A1
20110080096 Dudik Apr 2011 A1
20110080740 Allen Apr 2011 A1
20110080742 Allen Apr 2011 A1
20110089804 Mahalingam et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110089830 Pickard et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110089838 Pickard et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110095686 Falicoff Apr 2011 A1
20110121707 Fan May 2011 A1
20110122582 Park et al. May 2011 A1
20110128746 Zheng Jun 2011 A1
20110140148 Liu Jun 2011 A1
20110140149 Liu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110156584 Kim Jun 2011 A1
20110162823 Sharma Jul 2011 A1
20110169394 Chowdhury Jul 2011 A1
20110170299 Takase et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110204790 Arik et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110212834 Andersch et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110215345 Tarsa et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110215698 Tong Sep 2011 A1
20110234078 Choi Sep 2011 A1
20110279035 Van Dijk et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110286200 Iimura et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110298355 Van De Ven Dec 2011 A1
20120002419 Zaderej et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120008330 Horng et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120051058 Sharma et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120051088 Chui et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120080669 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120080699 Chowdhury Apr 2012 A1
20120112615 Kuenzler May 2012 A1
20120140486 Chou Jun 2012 A1
20120155059 Hoelen et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120161626 Van De Ven et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120182711 Kolodin et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120188775 Chuang Jul 2012 A1
20120194054 Johnston et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218768 Hisano et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120243235 Gao Sep 2012 A1
20120262915 Lin et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120287652 Breidenassel et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300455 Breidenassel et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130038195 Petroski et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130057140 Falicoff Mar 2013 A1
20130058098 Kim et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130063962 Huang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130176721 Lu et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130176722 Lay et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130194796 Progl Aug 2013 A1
20130214666 Leung et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130214676 Li et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140218892 Edwards Aug 2014 A1
20140340899 Bailey Nov 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (184)
Number Date Country
2496937 Mar 2004 CA
2515647 Sep 2004 CA
2549822 May 2005 CA
2425428 Mar 2001 CN
1550870 Dec 2004 CN
1551339 Dec 2004 CN
1561528 Jan 2005 CN
2800701 Jul 2006 CN
1811493 Aug 2006 CN
1816504 Aug 2006 CN
200955687 Oct 2007 CN
101104738 Jan 2008 CN
101363610 Feb 2009 CN
101517755 Aug 2009 CN
201425284 Mar 2010 CN
101828071 Sep 2010 CN
202065902 Dec 2011 CN
10301169 Jul 2003 DE
4208172 May 2006 DE
202009001828 Jul 2009 DE
202012101158 Apr 2012 DE
0237104 Sep 1987 EP
0415640 Mar 1991 EP
0751339 Jan 1997 EP
0859967 Aug 1999 EP
1009017 Jun 2000 EP
1191608 Mar 2002 EP
1198016 Apr 2002 EP
1253373 Oct 2002 EP
1573870 Sep 2005 EP
0942474 Apr 2006 EP
1662197 May 2006 EP
2177812 Apr 2010 EP
2233832 Sep 2010 EP
2236917 Oct 2010 EP
2442009 Apr 2012 EP
1423011 Jan 1976 GB
2195047 Mar 1988 GB
2373846 Oct 2002 GB
2405409 Mar 2005 GB
2413896 Nov 2005 GB
2424123 Sep 2006 GB
6210456 Jan 1987 JP
62199999 Sep 1987 JP
6333879 Feb 1988 JP
01233796 Sep 1989 JP
04113466 Oct 1992 JP
05152609 Jun 1993 JP
06151974 May 1994 JP
06177429 Jun 1994 JP
06244458 Sep 1994 JP
07193281 Jul 1995 JP
08148724 Jun 1996 JP
08162676 Jun 1996 JP
08330635 Dec 1996 JP
09246603 Sep 1997 JP
10242513 Sep 1998 JP
10282916 Oct 1998 JP
11261114 Sep 1999 JP
11298047 Oct 1999 JP
2000101147 Apr 2000 JP
2000101148 Apr 2000 JP
2000123620 Apr 2000 JP
2000156526 Jun 2000 JP
2000164012 Jun 2000 JP
2000174347 Jun 2000 JP
2000183405 Jun 2000 JP
2000208818 Jul 2000 JP
2000286455 Oct 2000 JP
2000286458 Oct 2000 JP
2000304908 Nov 2000 JP
2000315822 Nov 2000 JP
2000315824 Nov 2000 JP
2001035239 Feb 2001 JP
2001057445 Feb 2001 JP
2001077427 Mar 2001 JP
2001077433 Mar 2001 JP
2001108773 Apr 2001 JP
2001111115 Apr 2001 JP
2001144334 May 2001 JP
2001173239 Jun 2001 JP
2001215899 Aug 2001 JP
2001218378 Aug 2001 JP
2001230453 Aug 2001 JP
2001237462 Aug 2001 JP
2001243807 Sep 2001 JP
2001243809 Sep 2001 JP
2001274463 Oct 2001 JP
2002118293 Apr 2002 JP
2002133925 May 2002 JP
2002133938 May 2002 JP
2002141558 May 2002 JP
2002150821 May 2002 JP
2002158378 May 2002 JP
2002223004 Aug 2002 JP
2002261328 Sep 2002 JP
2002280616 Sep 2002 JP
2002304902 Oct 2002 JP
2003017755 Jan 2003 JP
2003023183 Jan 2003 JP
2003037298 Feb 2003 JP
2003110146 Apr 2003 JP
2003110150 Apr 2003 JP
2003110151 Apr 2003 JP
2003124525 Apr 2003 JP
2003206481 Jul 2003 JP
2003206482 Jul 2003 JP
2003224304 Aug 2003 JP
2003249613 Sep 2003 JP
2003346526 Dec 2003 JP
2004161996 Jun 2004 JP
2004185997 Jul 2004 JP
2004186109 Jul 2004 JP
2004188286 Jul 2004 JP
2004207690 Jul 2004 JP
2005108700 Apr 2005 JP
2005513815 May 2005 JP
2005166578 Jun 2005 JP
2005228855 Aug 2005 JP
2006502551 Jan 2006 JP
2006310057 Nov 2006 JP
2007234462 Sep 2007 JP
2008021505 Jan 2008 JP
2008200613 Sep 2008 JP
2008211060 Sep 2008 JP
2008544489 Dec 2008 JP
2009016415 Jan 2009 JP
2009032466 Feb 2009 JP
2009037995 Feb 2009 JP
2009038039 Feb 2009 JP
2009070732 Apr 2009 JP
2009099533 May 2009 JP
2009170114 Jul 2009 JP
2009181838 Aug 2009 JP
2010033959 Feb 2010 JP
2010504645 Feb 2010 JP
2010506366 Feb 2010 JP
2010056059 Mar 2010 JP
2010073438 Apr 2010 JP
2010518593 May 2010 JP
2011061157 Mar 2011 JP
2013524441 Jun 2013 JP
100405453 Nov 2003 KR
100934440 Dec 2009 KR
2010009909 Jan 2010 KR
20110008822 Jan 2011 KR
1017349 Feb 2011 KR
2011117090 Oct 2011 KR
457731 Oct 2001 TW
200516100 May 2005 TW
9910867 Mar 1999 WO
0057490 Sep 2000 WO
02089175 Nov 2002 WO
02091489 Nov 2002 WO
03021623 Mar 2003 WO
03040026 May 2003 WO
2005028549 Mar 2005 WO
2005057672 Jun 2005 WO
2005089293 Sep 2005 WO
2005102153 Nov 2005 WO
2005103555 Nov 2005 WO
2006003604 Jan 2006 WO
2006011655 Feb 2006 WO
2006067885 Jun 2006 WO
2006117447 Nov 2006 WO
2006129268 Dec 2006 WO
2006135496 Dec 2006 WO
2006138397 Dec 2006 WO
2008085550 Jul 2008 WO
2008120165 Oct 2008 WO
2008134056 Nov 2008 WO
2009052110 Apr 2009 WO
2009068471 Jun 2009 WO
2009071111 Jun 2009 WO
2009089529 Jul 2009 WO
20090084372 Jul 2009 WO
20090115512 Sep 2009 WO
2009128004 Oct 2009 WO
2009135359 Nov 2009 WO
2010038983 Apr 2010 WO
2011089069 Jul 2011 WO
2011089103 Jul 2011 WO
2011159961 Dec 2011 WO
2012084674 Jun 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (182)
Entry
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2013531566 dated Feb. 2, 2015
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,959 dated Mar. 11, 2015.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,767 dated Mar. 12, 2015.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,878 dated Mar. 16, 2015.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180027211.9 dated Mar. 23, 2015.
U.S. Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,339 dated Mar. 31, 2015.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/710,782 dated Apr. 16, 2015.
Chinese Decision of Rejection issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180057758.3 dated Apr. 17, 2015.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,959 dated May 4, 2015.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201180027205.3 dated May 22, 2015.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/079,992 dated May 27, 2015.
Chinese Decision of Rejection issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201080054756.4 dated Jun. 3, 2015.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,798 dated Jun. 10, 2015.
Australian Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011233563 dated Jun. 12, 2015.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/067973 dated Jun. 16, 2015.
Australian Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011205461 dated Jun. 25, 2015.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2012548995 dated Jun. 29, 2015.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2013502627 dated Jul. 1, 2015.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011233568 dated Jul. 10, 2015.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11713110.2 dated Jul. 30, 2015.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,767 dated Aug. 4, 2015.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201380008205.8 dated Aug. 6, 2015.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2013502622 dated Aug. 24, 2015.
Japanese Decision to Grant a Patent issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2013531566 dated Aug. 24, 2015.
Australian Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011233563 dated Sep. 15, 2015.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/205,542, dated Sep. 28, 2015.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,013 dated Oct. 5, 2015.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011233568 dated Oct. 14, 2015.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,878 dated Oct. 29, 2015.
Australian Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011233568 dated Oct. 30, 2015.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180057758.3 dated Nov. 12, 2015.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,959 dated Dec. 9, 2015.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180027205.3 dated Dec. 18, 2015.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 13719685.3 dated Jan. 18, 2016.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 13724956.1 dated Jan. 29, 2016.
Japanese Before Appeal issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2012548995 dated Feb. 2, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/183,013 dated Feb. 12, 2016.
Chinese Notification of Reexamination issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201080054756.4 dated Mar. 3, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,169 dated Mar. 10, 2016.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2015203255 dated Apr. 1, 2016.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2013502622 dated May 11, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,878 dated May 17, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/205,542 dated May 17, 2016.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180057758.3 dated May 30, 2016.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2013502627 dated Jun. 6, 2016.
Australian Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2015246150 dated Jun. 14, 2016.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180027205.3 dated Jul. 5, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,798 dated Jul. 6, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,944 dated Jul. 13, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,887 dated Sep. 19, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,169 dated Sep. 21, 2016.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2015212729 dated Oct. 17, 2016.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,957 dated Oct. 19, 2016.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,798 dated Nov. 4, 2016.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11708124.0 dated Nov. 11, 2016.
U.S. Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/205,542 dated Nov. 28, 2016.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 07837797.5 dated Dec. 6, 2016.
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201380023533.5 dated Dec. 12, 2016.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 13719685.3 dated Dec. 12, 2016.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with corresponding AU Application No. 2015246096 dated Dec. 23, 2016.
Chinese Decision of Rejection issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180027205.3 dated Jan. 22, 2017.
Australian Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2015246150 dated Feb. 3, 2017.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,878 dated Feb. 14, 2017.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,944 dated Feb. 14, 2017.
Unofficial English Translation of Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201380023503.4 dated Feb. 21, 2017.
Unofficial English Translation of Japanese Search Report issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2015212729 dated Feb. 27, 2017.
Mark J. Mayer et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,798, filed Dec. 6, 2012.
Glenn Howard Kuenzler et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,944, filed Nov. 4, 2014.
Glenn Howard Kuenzler et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/398,887, filed Nov. 4, 2014.
Glenn Howard Kuenzler et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,959, filed Nov. 1, 2012.
Karl Kristian Udris et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/710,782, filed Dec. 11, 2012.
Benjamin Lee Yoder et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,957, filed Nov. 10, 2014.
Ashfaqul I. Chowdhury et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,476, filed Dec. 28, 2010.
Ashfaqul I. Chowdhury et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,573, filed Dec. 28, 2010.
Jeyachandrabose Chinniah et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,052, filed Jul. 22, 2011.
Gary Robert Allen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,767, filed Feb. 6, 2012.
Ashfaqul Islam Chowdhury et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,611, filed Dec. 28, 2010.
Gary R. Allen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/205,542, filed Mar. 12, 2014.
Ashfaqul I. Chowdhury et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,529, filed Dec. 28, 2010.
Gary R. Allen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/896,314, filed Oct. 1, 2010.
Srinath K. Aanegola et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/886,878, filed May 3, 2013.
James Reginelli et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/516,533, filed Sep. 6, 2006.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,052 dated Mar. 5, 2013.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/028943 dated Apr. 2, 2013.
European Search Report and Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 10821324.0 dated Apr. 8, 2013.
PCT Invitation to pay additional fees issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/022485 dated May 6, 2013.
U.S. Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,611 dated May 23, 2013.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,476, dated Jun. 4, 2013.
Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,529 dated Jun. 13, 2013.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/022485 dated Jul. 4, 2013.
A copy of PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/037556 dated Jul. 12, 2013.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,339 dated Jul. 16, 2013.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,767 dated Jul. 19, 2013.
A copy of PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039482 dated Jul. 25, 2013.
A copy of PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039513 dated Jul. 25, 2013.
A copy of PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039464 dated Aug. 1, 2013.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201080054756.4 dated Aug. 21, 2013.
U.S. Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,573 dated Oct. 29, 2013.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,476 dated Nov. 25, 2013.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,767 dated Jan. 15, 2014.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/046442 dated Jan. 28, 2014.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/067973 dated Feb. 4, 2014.
European Search Report and Opinion issued in connection with related EP Application No. 05740241.4 dated Feb. 26, 2014.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,339 dated Mar. 11, 2014.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180057758.3 dated Apr. 3, 2014.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201080054756.4 dated Jun. 10, 2014.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180005962.0 dated Jun. 10, 2014.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 05740241.4 dated Jun. 16, 2014.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180027211.9 dated Jun. 30, 2014.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/366,767 dated Jul. 17, 2014.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2010300448 dated Jul. 19, 2014.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2010300489 dated Jul. 21, 2014.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,959 dated Aug. 7, 2014.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,476 dated Aug. 14, 2014.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/706,798 dated Aug. 26, 2014.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding CN Application No. 201180027205.3 dated Sep. 3, 2014.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 13/710,782 dated Sep. 22, 2014.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011233568 dated Oct. 22, 2014.
Australian Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2012287359 dated Oct. 23, 2014.
Australian Office Action issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011233563 dated Oct. 27, 2014.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2012548995 dated Oct. 29, 2014.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2011205461 dated Nov. 3, 2014.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/037556 dated Nov. 4, 2014.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039464 dated Nov. 4, 2014.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039482 dated Nov. 4, 2014.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/039513 dated Nov. 4, 2014.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2013502622 dated Nov. 17, 2014.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201080054756.4 dated Nov. 26, 2014.
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201180057758.3 dated Nov. 27, 2014.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with corresponding JP Application No. 2013502627 dated Dec. 8, 2014.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11713110.2 dated Dec. 22, 2014.
European Office Action issued in connection with related EP Application No. 11713109.4 dated Jan. 30, 2015.
Berber et al., “Unusually High Thermal Conductivity of Carbon Nanotubes”, Physical Review Letters, vol. No. 84, Issue No. 20, pp. 4613-4616, May 15, 2000.
Cookson Electronics, “Imaging Technologies Update”, Enthone Inc, vol. No. 12, pp. 2, Jun. 2002.
Ohno, “Color Rendering and Lumious Efficacy of White LED Spectra”, Proceedings, SPIE 5530, Fourth International Conference on Solid State Lighting, Denver, Aug. 3-5, 2004.
Radkov, “High Quality White Light with Near UV LED Chips”, 3rd Annual Phophor Global Summit, SanDiego, Mar. 2, 2005.
D5470, “Standard Test Method for Thermal Transmission Properties . . . , ”ASTM International, pp. 1-6, 2006.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,862 dated Mar. 7, 2006.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/014043 dated Mar. 21, 2006.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 10/831,862 dated Nov. 1, 2006.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2005/014043 dated Nov. 1, 2006.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/312,268 dated Feb. 8, 2008.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/047869 dated Jun. 20, 2008.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/047869 dated Jun. 24, 2008.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/312,268 dated Aug. 20, 2008.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/019425 dated Mar. 6, 2009.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/019425 dated Mar. 10, 2009.
“Philips Lighting unveils 600 lumen dimmable A-shape LED bulb for incandescent replacement”, LEDs Magazine, 2 pages, May 5, 2009 retrieved from http://www.ledsmagazine.com/products/18582?cmpid=EnlLEDsMay132009 dated Feb. 13, 2017.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/516,533 dated May 15, 2009.
US Department Energy, Bright tomorrow lighting competition Revision1, Jun. 26, 2009.
“Sharp Introduces Nine New LED Lamps for Home Use”, Sharp, Jun. 11, 2009, retrieved from http://sharp-world.com/corporate/news/090611_2_html dated Feb. 13, 2017.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/312,268 dated Aug. 24, 2009.
Abdullah et al., “Enhancement of Natural Convection Heat Transfer From a Fin by Rectangular Perforations with Aspect Ratio of Two”, International Journal of Physical Sciences, vol. No. 04, Issue No. 10, pp. 540-547, Oct. 2009.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 11/516,533 dated Nov. 24, 2009.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2005239406 dated Mar. 18, 2010.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2007510852 dated Feb. 7, 2011.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2005239406 dated May 3, 2011.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/028970 dated Jun. 14, 2011.
Home Depot product catalog, “EcoSmart 13-Watt (60W) LED A19 Lamp Warm White Light Bulb”, pp. 1-3, Jul. 13, 2011.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/020744 dated Aug. 10, 2011.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/028943 dated Aug. 25, 2011.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/028934 dated Aug. 29, 2011.
Australian Examination Report issued in connection with related AU Application No. 2005239406 dated Aug. 31, 2011.
U.S. Restriction requirement issued in connection with corsponding U.S. Appl. No. 29/359,239 dated Sep. 22, 2011.
Japanese Office Action issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2007510852 dated Dec. 12, 2011.
Cree, “Cree® XLamp® XB-D LED 75-watt Equivalent A19 Lamp Reference Design”, pp. 1-15, 2012.
Jiang et al., “TIR Optics Enhance the Illuminance on Target for Directional LED Modules”, Feb. 2012.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,611 dated Apr. 10, 2012.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,339 dated Jun. 6, 2012.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,612 dated Jun. 12, 2012.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,717 dated Jun. 14, 2012.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/020744 dated Jul. 26, 2012.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,611 dated Sep. 12, 2012.
U.S. Notice of Allowance issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 29/420,071 dated Sep. 14, 2012.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,476 dated Sep. 17, 2012.
Japanese Before Appeal issued in connection with related JP Application No. 2007510852 dated Sep. 21, 2012.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/028934 dated Oct. 2, 2012.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/028970 dated Oct. 2, 2012.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with related PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/046442 dated Oct. 10, 2012.
U.S. Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/884,717 dated Nov. 6, 2012.
Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/572,339 dated Jan. 11, 2013.
U.S. Non-Final Office Action issued in connection with related U.S. Appl. No. 12/979,529 dated Feb. 7, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140160763 A1 Jun 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12572480 Oct 2009 US
Child 14062317 US