Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the invention relate to lenses for lighting applications and, more particularly, to linear lenses designed to retrofit systems built for fluorescent tube lights.
Description of the Related Art
Troffer-style fixtures are ubiquitous in commercial office and industrial spaces throughout the world. In many instances these troffers house elongated tubular fluorescent lamps or light bulbs that span the length of the troffer. Troffers may be mounted to or suspended from ceilings, such as being suspended by a “T-grid”. Often the troffer may be recessed into the ceiling, with the back side of the troffer protruding into the plenum area above the ceiling. Typically, elements of the troffer on the back side dissipate heat generated by the light source into the plenum where air can be circulated to facilitate the cooling mechanism. U.S. Pat. No. 5,823,663 to Bell, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,025 to Schmidt, et al. are examples of typical troffer-style fixtures.
More recently, with the advent of the efficient solid state lighting sources, these troffers have been used with LEDs as their light source. LEDs are solid state devices that convert electric energy to light and generally comprise one or more active regions of semiconductor material interposed between oppositely doped semiconductor layers. When a bias is applied across the doped layers, holes and electrons are injected into the active region where they recombine to generate light. Light is produced in the active region and emitted from surfaces of the LED.
LEDs have certain characteristics that make them desirable for many lighting applications that were previously the realm of incandescent or fluorescent lights. Incandescent lights are very energy-inefficient light sources with approximately ninety percent of the electricity they consume being released as heat rather than light. Fluorescent light bulbs are more energy efficient than incandescent light bulbs by a factor of about 10, but are still relatively inefficient. LEDs by contrast, can emit the same luminous flux as incandescent and fluorescent lights using a fraction of the energy.
In addition, LEDs can have a significantly longer operational lifetime. Incandescent light bulbs have relatively short lifetimes, with some having a lifetime in the range of about 750-1000 hours. Fluorescent bulbs can also have lifetimes longer than incandescent bulbs such as in the range of approximately 10,000-20,000 hours, but provide less desirable color reproduction. In comparison, LEDs can have lifetimes between 50,000 and 70,000 hours. The increased efficiency and extended lifetime of LEDs is attractive to many lighting suppliers and has resulted in their LED lights being used in place of conventional lighting in many different applications. It is predicted that further improvements will result in their general acceptance in more and more lighting applications. An increase in the adoption of LEDs in place of incandescent or fluorescent lighting would result in increased lighting efficiency and significant energy saving.
There has been recent interest in upgrading existing troffer style lighting systems with LED sources (or engines) to capitalize on the above advantages. Current options for upgrading include complete fixture replacement such as by the commercially available CR Series Architectural LED Troffer, provided by Cree, Inc. Some features of these troffers are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/873,303, titled “Troffer-style Fixture”, and assigned to Cree, Inc. Performing complete fixture replacement can require penetrating the ceiling plenum by a skilled technician. This can be time consuming and expensive, and in many locations, building codes can require that a licensed electrician perform any work in the plenum space above a ceiling.
Some troffer-style fixtures utilize arrays of LEDs, to achieve a particular light output profile. Arrayed LED designs have become popular due to economies of size and efficiency. Lighting applications may include linear arrays, two-dimensional arrays, and even three-dimensional arrays. U.S. application Ser. No. 12/074,762, commonly assigned to CREE, INC., provides examples of some of these emitter arrays.
Emitter arrays have been used in lighting fixtures. U.S. application Ser. No. 12/873,303, commonly assigned to CREE, INC., discloses, inter alia, solid state emitter arrays used in troffer-style fixtures. Troffer-style fixtures are ubiquitous in commercial office and industrial spaces throughout the world. In many instances these troffers house elongated fluorescent light bulbs that span the length of the troffer. Troffers may be mounted to or suspended from ceilings. Often the troffer may be recessed into the ceiling, with the back side of the troffer protruding into the plenum area above the ceiling. Typically, elements of the troffer on the back side dissipate heat generated by the light source into the plenum where air can be circulated to facilitate the cooling mechanism. U.S. Pat. No. 5,823,663 to Bell, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,025 to Schmidt, et al., are examples of typical troffer-style fixtures.
Other LED components or lamps have been developed that comprise an array of multiple LED packages mounted to a (PCB), substrate or submount. The array of LED packages can comprise groups of LED packages emitting different colors, and specular reflector systems to reflect light emitted by the LED chips. Some of these LED components are arranged to produce a white light combination of the light emitted by the different LED chips.
In order to generate a desired output color, it is sometimes necessary to mix colors of light which are more easily produced using common semiconductor systems. Of particular interest is the generation of white light for use in everyday lighting applications. Conventional LEDs cannot generate white light from their active layers; it must be produced from a combination of other colors. For example, blue emitting LEDs have been used to generate white light by surrounding the blue LED with a yellow phosphor, polymer or dye, with a typical phosphor being cerium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Ce:YAG). The surrounding phosphor material “downconverts” some of the blue light, changing it to yellow light. Some of the blue light passes through the phosphor without being changed while a substantial portion of the light is downconverted to yellow. The LED emits both blue and yellow light, which combine to yield white light.
In another known approach, light from a violet or ultraviolet emitting LED has been converted to white light by surrounding the LED with multicolor phosphors or dyes. Indeed, many other color combinations have been used to generate white light.
Because of the physical arrangement of the various source elements, multicolor sources often cast shadows with color separation and provide an output with poor color uniformity. For example, a source featuring blue and yellow emitters may appear to have a blue tint when viewed head on and a yellow tint when viewed from the side. Thus, one challenge associated with multicolor light sources is good spatial color mixing over the entire range of viewing angles. One known approach to the problem of color mixing is to use a diffuser to scatter light from the various sources.
Another known method to improve color mixing is to reflect or bounce the light off of several surfaces before it is emitted from the lamp. This has the effect of disassociating the emitted light from its initial emission angle. Uniformity typically improves with an increasing number of bounces, but each bounce has an associated optical loss. Some applications use intermediate diffusion mechanisms (e.g., formed diffusers and textured lenses) to mix the various colors of light. Many of these devices are lossy and, thus, improve the color uniformity at the expense of the optical efficiency of the device.
Many current luminaire designs utilize forward-facing LED components with a specular reflector disposed behind the LEDs. One design challenge associated with multi-source luminaries is blending the light from LED sources within the luminaire so that the individual sources are not visible to an observer. Diffusive elements are also used to mix the color spectra from the various sources to achieve a uniform output color profile. To blend the sources and aid in color mixing, diffusive exit windows have been used.
There has been recent interest in upgrading existing troffer-style lighting systems with LED sources (or engines) to capitalize on advantages discussed above. Current options for upgrading include complete fixture replacement such as by the commercially available CR Series Architectural LED Troffer, provided by Cree, Inc. Some features of these troffers are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/873,303, titled “Troffer-style Fixture”, and assigned to Cree, Inc. Performing complete fixture replacement can require penetrating the ceiling plenum by a skilled technician. This can be time consuming and expensive, and in many locations, building codes can require that a licensed electrician perform any work in the plenum space above a ceiling.
Many modern applications require a surface-mount type fixture. Several different surface-mount fixture architectures are offered on the market today, such as the CITADEL™ line of fixture enclosures from SLP Lighting.
A light engine according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises the following elements. An elongated mount structure comprises a base plate and at least one mount surface, with a plurality of light emitters on the at least one mount surface. An elongated lens runs in a longitudinal direction proximate to the light emitters such that substantially all light emitted from the light emitters interacts with the lens. The light engine produces a light output with a peak intensity in regions that are off-axis from a central normal axis that is perpendicular to the base plate.
A light fixture according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises the following elements. An exit lens is attached to a fixture housing such that the lens and the fixture housing define an interior chamber. A light engine is disposed within the interior chamber, with the light engine comprising: a plurality of light emitters; an elongated mount structure comprising a base plate and at least one mount surface, with the light emitters on the at least one mount surface; an elongated lens running in a longitudinal direction and proximate to the light emitters such that substantially all light emitted from the light emitters interacts with the lens; and driver electronics connected to power and control the light emitters. The light engine produces a light output with a peak intensity in regions that are off-axis from a central normal axis that is perpendicular to the base plate.
An elongated lens according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises the following elements. An elongated body having a generally arced cross-section is defined by a curved light entry surface on one side and a plurality of light exit surfaces opposite the light entry surface, with the light exit surfaces comprising a plurality of substantially triangular structures protruding from the body away from the light entry surface. The lens has at least one attachment surface for fastening the lens to an external structure.
A light engine according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises the following elements. An elongated mount structure comprises at least one mount surface, with a plurality of light emitters on the at least one mount surface. An elongated lens runs in a longitudinal direction proximate to the light emitters such that substantially all light emitted from the light emitters interacts with the lens. The light engine produces a light output with a peak intensity in regions that are off-axis from a central normal axis that is perpendicular to a base plane.
Embodiments of the present invention provide light fixtures, e.g., surface-mount and troffer-style light fixtures, having retrofit lenses and light engine units therein. In order to mimic the size and appearance of fluorescent bulbs in existing fixtures, LEDs are may be arranged on light bars or mount surfaces with integrated lenses to both diffuse the light and shape the output beam. One or more LEDs can be mounted, sometimes in clusters, along the length of a base of the light engine which can then be inserted into a fixture. An elongated lens is mounted to the base over the LEDs so that light emitted from the LEDs interacts with the lens before it escapes the fixture. These elongated lenses may be extruded from a diffusive material and can be shaped in various ways. For example, the lenses may be shaped to disperse more light to the sides, i.e., in a direction away from a normal axis that is perpendicular to the base.
Embodiments of the present invention may be used in light fixtures and retrofit systems for various different light applications, and are particularly adapted for use with troffer-style and surface-mount fixtures. These systems can provide the same amount of light as traditional light fixtures, for example 1600-4000 lumens and above. The systems can be also used with many different light sources but are particularly well-suited for use with solid state light sources or light engines, such as those utilizing LEDs. The LED light engines can have an elongated form, similar to fluorescent light sources, and can comprise a generally linear array of LEDs. These LED light engines can be referred to herein as a “light source bar” or “light bar.” Some embodiments of the present invention comprise a mechanical mounting system for installing an LED light engine within an existing surface-mount or troffer fixture architecture.
In the case of troffer fixtures, by leaving the existing pan in place, embodiments of the present invention can rely on the troffer pan to act as a barrier against the spread of fire and smoke. In many areas, local codes may not allow for the use of plastic components inside the plenum space above the ceiling. This is due to concerns that if a fire occurred in one room, toxic smoke from burning plastics could be carried to other locations which share the air plenum. Maintaining the host fixture troffer pan as a barrier to this spread of toxic smoke can allow for the use of lower cost plastic parts above the ceiling plane in the troffer pan. Without the troffer pan barrier, these plastic parts might otherwise not be allowed in the plenum space.
During the upgrade process, contamination may also be a concern, particularly in a hospital or clean room environment. In upgrade processes where the entire fixture is replaced, the sheet metal pan or housing of an existing troffer lighting system is removed. Removing the host fixture pan can generate dust which must be contained, and the surrounding area must be cleaned prior to resuming normal operations within the environment. Preventing dust is of particular concern in the case of dust containing dangerous materials such as asbestos. In certain environments, construction permits may be required for an upgrade process that requires removal of the troffer pan, which can add additional complications and costs.
Another alternative upgrade option is by a fixture retrofit where a new LED based light engine or light bar can be installed into the sheet metal pan of an existing troffer system or the fixture housing of a surface-mount system. This can provide the advantage of using light bars with design features optimized for an LED-based system including reflectors, lenses, prismatic elements, and power supplies, such as those discussed herein. This approach also allows light engines which are approved for use in other applications to be used in a retrofit application. Some troffer retrofits advantageously eliminate the need to remove the existing troffer pan, with the pan acting as a barrier to the plenum space. Leaving the pan intact during the retrofit process does not disturb wiring connections, insulation, etc., found in the plenum space and may also allow for work to be performed by non-licensed personnel, which can result in a significant cost savings over work performed by licensed electricians.
The present invention is described herein with reference to certain embodiments, but it is understood that the invention can be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. In particular, the present invention is described below with regard to certain troffer and surface-mount type fixtures and retrofit systems that can be used with existing fixtures, but it is understood that elements of the embodiments described can be used to retrofit and/or upgrade different types of lighting systems. The systems can also be used with many different light systems, sources, and engines beyond those described herein, with many being LED-based.
It is understood that when an element is referred to as being “on” another element, it can be directly on the other element or intervening elements may also be present. Furthermore, relative terms such as “inner”, “outer”, “upper”, “above”, “lower”, “beneath”, and “below”, and similar terms, may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element to another. It is understood that these terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures.
Although the ordinal terms first, second, etc., may be used herein to describe various elements, components, regions and/or sections, these elements, components, regions, and/or sections should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element, component, region, or section from another. Thus, unless expressly stated otherwise, a first element, component, region, or section discussed below could be termed a second element, component, region, or section without departing from the teachings of the present invention.
As used herein, the term “emitter” can be used to indicate a single light source or more than one light source functioning as a single emitter. For example, the term may be used to describe a single blue LED, or it may be used to describe a red LED and a green LED in proximity emitting as a single source. Additionally, the term “emitter” may indicate a single LED chip or multiple LED chips arranged in an array, for example. Thus, the terms “source” and “emitter” should not be construed as a limitation indicating either a single-element or a multi-element configuration unless clearly stated otherwise. Indeed, in many instances the terms “source” and “emitter” may be used interchangeably. It is also understood that an emitter may be any device that emits light, including but not limited to LEDs, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs), and the like.
The term “color” as used herein with reference to light is meant to describe light having a characteristic average wavelength; it is not meant to limit the light to a single wavelength. Thus, light of a particular color (e.g., green, red, blue, yellow, etc.) includes a range of wavelengths that are grouped around a particular average wavelength.
Embodiments of the present invention are described herein with reference to conversion materials, wavelength conversion materials, phosphors, phosphor layers and related terms. The use of these terms should not be construed as limiting. It is understood that the use of the term phosphor (or phosphor layers) is meant to encompass and be equally applicable to all wavelength conversion materials.
Embodiments of the invention are described herein with reference to cross-sectional and/or cutaway views that are schematic illustrations. As such, the actual thickness of elements can be different, and variations from the shapes of the illustrations as a result, for example, of manufacturing techniques and/or tolerances are expected. Thus, the elements illustrated in the figures are schematic in nature and their shapes are not intended to illustrate the precise shape of a region of a device and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Many industrial, commercial, and residential applications call for white light sources. The light fixture 400 may comprise one or more emitters (e.g., LEDs) producing the same color of light or different colors of light. In one embodiment, a multicolor source is used to produce white light. Several colored light combinations will yield white light. For example, as discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,213,940 and 7,768,192, both of which are assigned to Cree, Inc., and both of which are incorporated herein by reference, it is known in the art to combine light from a blue LED with wavelength-converted yellow light to yield white light with correlated color temperature (CCT) in the range between 5000K to 7000K (often designated as “cool white”). Both blue and yellow light can be generated with a blue emitter by surrounding the emitter with phosphors that are optically responsive to the blue light. When excited, the phosphors emit yellow light which then combines with the blue light to make white.
Another example of generating white light with a multicolor source is combining the light from green and red LEDs. RGB schemes may also be used to generate various colors of light. In some applications, an amber emitter is added for an RGBA combination. The previous combinations are exemplary; it is understood that many different color combinations may be used in embodiments of the present invention. Several of these possible color combinations are discussed in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,213,940 to Van de Ven et al.
The light fixture 400 may include the lighting arrangements 500, 520, 540 each of which represent possible LED combinations that result in an output spectrum that can be mixed to generate white light. Each light engine unit can include the electronics and interconnections necessary to power the emitters. In some embodiments the light engine unit comprises a printed circuit board with the emitters mounted and interconnected thereon.
The lighting arrangement 500 includes clusters 502 of discrete LEDs, with each LED within the cluster 502 spaced a distance from the next LED, and each cluster 502 spaced a distance from the next cluster. If the LEDs within a cluster are spaced at too great distance from one another, the colors of the individual sources may become visible, causing unwanted color-striping. In some embodiments, an acceptable range of distances for separating consecutive LEDs within a cluster is not more than approximately 8 mm.
The scheme shown in
The lighting arrangement 520 includes clusters 522 of discrete LEDs. The scheme shown in
The lighting arrangement 540 includes clusters 524 of discrete LEDs. The scheme shown in
As previously noted, the emitters do not have to be arranged linearly. In many cases, a non-linear arrangement is required. For example,
The lighting schemes shown in
Again with reference to
Diffuse reflective coatings have the inherent capability to mix light from solid state light sources having different spectra (i.e., different colors). These coatings are particularly well-suited for multi-source designs where two different spectra are mixed to produce a desired output color point. For example, LEDs emitting blue light may be used in combination with LEDs emitting yellow (or blue-shifted yellow) light to yield a white light output. A diffuse reflective coating may help to reduce the need for spatial color-mixing elements that can introduce lossy elements into the system; although, in some embodiments it may be desirable to use a diffuse back reflector in combination with other diffusive elements. In some embodiments, the base may be coated with a phosphor material that converts the wavelength of at least some of the light from the LEDs to achieve a light output of the desired color point.
The base plate 406 can comprise materials other than diffuse reflectors. In other embodiments, the base plate 406 can comprise a specular reflective material or a material that is partially diffuse reflective and partially specular reflective. In some embodiments, it may be desirable to use a specular material in one area and a diffuse material in another area. In yet other embodiments, the base plate 406 may comprise additional reflective structures to redirect light in a particular direction. Many combinations are possible.
In this embodiment, an exit lens 410 is attached to a fixture housing 412 such that they define an interior chamber 414. The housing may be constructed of various materials, including plastics and cold-rolled steel, for example. The exit lens 410 comprises a light transmissive material that allows light from the emitters 402 to exit from the interior chamber 414. In many direct lighting solutions, the light exit surface will be diffusive to improve color mixing and reduce imaging of the sources. Thus, the exit lens 410 of the fixture 400 is shaped to have a ribbed exterior to provide the desired diffusive effect. In other embodiments, the diffusive effect can be achieved within the material itself rather than by external shaping such that the diffusive exit lens can have a smooth exterior finish, giving the lens a frosted or cloudy appearance.
The lens 408 can comprise many different elements and materials. In one embodiment, the lens 408 comprises a diffusive element. Diffusive lenses function in several ways. For example, they can prevent direct visibility of the emitters 402 and provide additional mixing of the outgoing light to achieve a visually pleasing uniform source. However, a diffusive lens can introduce additional optical loss into the system. Thus, in embodiments where the light is sufficiently mixed by other elements external to the light engine (e.g., fixture elements), a diffusive lens may be unnecessary. In some embodiments, scattering particles may be included in the lens 408. Although many different materials may be used to fabricate the lens 408, some suitable materials include poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polycarbonates.
Diffusive elements in the lens 408 can be achieved with several different structures. A diffusive film inlay can be applied to a light entry surface or an exit surface. It is also possible to manufacture the lens 408 to include an integral diffusive layer, such as by coextruding the two materials or insert molding the diffuser onto the entry or exit surfaces. A clear lens may include a diffractive or repeated geometric pattern rolled into an extrusion or molded into the surface at the time of manufacture. In another embodiment, the lens material itself may comprise a volumetric diffuser, such as an added colorant or particles having a different index of refraction, for example.
In other embodiments, the lens 408 may be used to optically shape the outgoing beam with the use of microlens structures, for example. Microlens structures are discussed in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/442,311 to Lu, et al., which is commonly assigned with the present application to CREE, INC. and incorporated by reference herein.
Several measurements were taken of various light engines and lenses according to various embodiments of the present invention. In addition, several simulations were performed to model the performance of the light engines and lenses and to compare with the measurements that were taken. All simulations referred to herein were created using the LightTools program from Optical Research Associates. LightTools is a software suite well-known in the lighting industry for producing reliable simulations that provide accurate predictions of performance in the real world. Simulations of the various embodiments discussed below include polar graphs showing radiant intensity (W/sr) versus viewing angle (degrees). The light sources used in the simulations mimic the performance of XLamp XP-E LEDs that are commercially available from Cree, Inc.
In both fixture embodiments (i.e., ribbed exit lens and smooth exit lens), the light engine units using the lens 408 produce an output distribution in which the peak relative intensity is located in regions that are off-axis from the normal axis, namely in the viewing angle range of 60°-80° on both sides of the fixture, with a relatively uniform intensity distribution in between.
The lens 1102 has a substantially more compact profile in the normal direction (z-direction) and is much wider (in the x-direction) than the lens 408. Some exemplary measurements are given in the figure, although it is understood that other sizes may be used to accommodate a particular form factor or produce a desired output profile. Here, the maximum triangular feature size of 0.418 cm is a little less than 2.5 times the size of the lens waist which is 0.171 cm. The ratio between these two measurements should be small so that the lens can easily be manufactured as a monolithic element using an extrusion process. In some embodiments, the ratio of the feature size to the lens waist is less than approximately 3. In other embodiments, the ratio of the feature size to the lens size is less than approximately 2. The ratios mentioned herein are merely exemplary; other thicknesses and feature sizes may also be used, especially if the lens is to be produced by means other than extrusion.
Two elongated reflector plates 1610 extend away from the mount surfaces 1608 to redirect incident light in a direction away from the normal axis. Thus, at least some light that would have been emitted in the normal direction is initially redirected toward the sides of the fixture 1600 prior to interaction with the exit lens 1612. Additional reflective structures 1614 can be used to tailor the output profile as well. The reflective structures 1614 are disposed on the base plate 1606 and angled slightly to redirect light away from the base plate 1606 toward the exit lens 1612. In other embodiments, the reflective structures may be shaped and/or oriented differently to internally shape the beam.
In this particular embodiment the light engine elements, including the lens 1608, the angled mount surfaces 1604, the reflector plates 1610, and the reflector structures 1614, work in combination to produce the output profile shown in
Along with the surface-mount fixture applications previously discussed, lens and light bar elements disclosed herein may also be inserted into preexisting troffer-style fixtures, or these elements may be incorporated into new troffer fixtures that are ready for installation. One exemplary troffer-style fixture is shown in
Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to certain preferred configurations thereof, other versions are possible. Embodiments of the present invention can comprise any combination of compatible features shown in the various figures, and these embodiments should not be limited to those expressly illustrated and discussed. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the invention should not be limited to the versions described above.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/961,385 filed on 6 Dec. 2010. The application referred to in this paragraph is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| D85382 | Guth | Oct 1931 | S |
| 2356654 | Cullman | Aug 1944 | A |
| 3381124 | Eisenberg | Apr 1968 | A |
| 4939627 | Herst et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5025356 | Gawad | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5526190 | Hubble, III | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5823663 | Bell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| D407473 | Wimbock | Mar 1999 | S |
| 6149283 | Conway et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6155699 | Miller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6210025 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6234643 | Lichon, Jr. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6402347 | Maas et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6443598 | Morgan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6523974 | Engel | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6578979 | Truttmann-Battig | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6598998 | West | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| D496121 | Santoro | Sep 2004 | S |
| 6871983 | Jacob et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6948838 | Kunstler | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6948840 | Grenda et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6951415 | Amano | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 7021797 | Minano et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7049761 | Timmermans et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7063449 | Ward | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7111969 | Bottesch | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7175296 | Cok | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7213940 | Van de Ven et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7217004 | Park | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7237924 | Martineau et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| D556358 | Santoro | Nov 2007 | S |
| 7338182 | Hastings et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7341358 | Hsieh | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7510299 | Timmermans et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7520636 | Van Der Poel | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| D593246 | Fowler et al. | May 2009 | S |
| 7559672 | Parkyn et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7594736 | Kassay et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| D604446 | Fowler et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
| 7618157 | Galvez et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
| 7618160 | Chinniah et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| D608932 | Castelli | Jan 2010 | S |
| 7654702 | Ding et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7661844 | Sekiguchi et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| D611183 | Duarte | Mar 2010 | S |
| 7674005 | Chung et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7686470 | Chiang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7686484 | Heiking et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7712918 | Siemiet et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7722220 | Van de Ven | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7722227 | Zhang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| D617487 | Fowler et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
| 7768192 | Van de Ven et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7815338 | Siemiet et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7824056 | Madireddi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7828468 | Mayfield et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| D633247 | Kong et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
| 7922354 | Everhart | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7926982 | Liu | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7988321 | Wung et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7988335 | Liu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7991257 | Coleman | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 7993034 | Wegner | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7997762 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8038314 | Ladewig | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8038321 | Franck et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8070326 | Lee | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| D653376 | Kong et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
| 8092043 | Lin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8092049 | Kinnune et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8096671 | Cronk | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| D657488 | Lown et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
| 8162504 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8186855 | Wassel et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8197086 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8201968 | Maxik et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8215799 | Vanden Eynden et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8246219 | Teng | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8256927 | Hu | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| D670849 | Lay et al. | Nov 2012 | S |
| 8317354 | Gassner et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| D679848 | Pickard et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
| 8410514 | Kim | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| D684291 | Goelz et al. | Jun 2013 | S |
| 8480252 | Bertram et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8506135 | Oster | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8556452 | Simon | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8591058 | Concepcion | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8591071 | Hochstein | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8602601 | Khazi et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8616723 | Zhang | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| D698975 | Blessitt et al. | Feb 2014 | S |
| 8641243 | Rashidi | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| D701988 | Clements | Apr 2014 | S |
| 8696154 | Hutchens | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702264 | Rashidi | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8769244 | Kyo | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| D714988 | Park et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
| D721198 | Glasbrenner | Jan 2015 | S |
| 9052075 | Demuynck et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 20030063476 | English et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001344 | Hecht | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085779 | Pond et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100796 | Ward | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240230 | Kitajima | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050180135 | Mayer | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050264716 | Kim et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281023 | Gould | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060221611 | Noh | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262521 | Piepgras et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291206 | Angelini et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070070625 | Bang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109779 | Sekiguchi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211457 | Mayfield et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253205 | Welker | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297181 | Mayfield et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080019147 | Erchak | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037284 | Rudisill | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080049422 | Trenchard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080232093 | Kim | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278943 | Van Der Poel | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090034247 | Boyer | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090073693 | Nall | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090161356 | Negley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090168439 | Chiang | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090196024 | Heiking et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090237958 | Kim | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090262543 | Ho | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090296388 | Wu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090310354 | Zampini et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100061108 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097794 | Teng et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100103678 | Van de Ven et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100110679 | Teng et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100172133 | Lie | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100177532 | Simon et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100188609 | Matsuki et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100253591 | Hwu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100254128 | Pickard et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100254145 | Yamaguchi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100254146 | McCanless | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100270903 | Jao et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100271843 | Holten et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277905 | Janik et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277934 | Oquendo, Jr. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295468 | Pederson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100327768 | Kong et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110032714 | Chang | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043132 | Kim et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090671 | Bertram et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110141722 | Acampora et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110141734 | Li | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110156584 | Kim | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110164417 | Huang | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175533 | Holman | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110199005 | Bretschneider et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110199769 | Bretschneider et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246146 | Kauffman et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255292 | Shen | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267810 | Higman et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267823 | Angelini et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110305024 | Chang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120033420 | Kim et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120038289 | Jee et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120051041 | Edmond et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120127714 | Rehn | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120134146 | Smith | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120140442 | Woo | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120140461 | Pickard | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20130235568 | Green et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130258652 | Hsieh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140265930 | Harris | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150016100 | Ishii | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1762061 | Apr 2006 | CN |
| 1934389 | Mar 2007 | CN |
| 1963289 | May 2007 | CN |
| 101188261 | May 2008 | CN |
| 101660715 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 101776254 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 101776254 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 101790660 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 101790660 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 102072443 | May 2011 | CN |
| 202580962 | Dec 2012 | CN |
| 102007030186 | Jan 2009 | DE |
| 202010001832 | Jul 2010 | DE |
| 1298383 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1298383 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 2636945 | Sep 2003 | EP |
| 1357335 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1653254 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1737051 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 1847762 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 1847762 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 1860467 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 2287520 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 2290690 | Mar 2011 | EP |
| 774198 | May 1957 | GB |
| 1069809 | Mar 1998 | JP |
| 2002244027 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 03097327 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2004140327 | May 2004 | JP |
| 2004345615 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2004345615 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2006173624 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 2008147044 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| 3151501 | Jun 2009 | JP |
| 2009295577 | Dec 2009 | JP |
| 2010103687 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2011018571 | Aug 2011 | JP |
| 2011018572 | Aug 2011 | JP |
| 200524186 | Jul 2005 | TW |
| 200524186 | Jul 2005 | TW |
| 200914759 | Apr 2009 | TW |
| 201018826 | May 2010 | TW |
| 201018826 | May 2010 | TW |
| WO 03102467 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2009030233 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009140761 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009157999 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009157999 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009157999 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010024583 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010024583 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010042216 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010042216 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011074424 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011098181 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011096098 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011118991 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011140353 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Decision of Rejection from Japanese Appl. No. 2013-543207, dated Nov. 25, 2014. |
| Office Action from Mexican Appl. No 100881, dated Nov. 28, 2014. |
| Grant Notice from European Appl. No. 13701525.1-1757, dated Nov. 24, 2014. |
| Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT/US2013/035668, dated Oct. 14, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/442,746, dated Sep. 15, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,080, dated Sep. 16, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,431, dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,630, dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,217, dated Oct. 22, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,385, dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,924, dated Nov. 7, 2014. |
| Second Office Action and Search Report from Chinese Appl. No 2011800529984, dated Dec. 26, 2014. |
| Grant Notice from European Appl. No. 13701525.1, dated Nov. 19, 2014. |
| International Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2013/049225, dated Jan. 22, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,348, dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,303, dated Nov. 28, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745, dated Dec. 10, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,741, dated Dec. 24, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,535, dated Jan. 13, 2015. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from Appl. No. PCT/CN2013/072772, dated Dec. 19, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2013/049225, dated Oct. 24, 2013. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745, dated Feb. 12, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,924, dated Feb. 19, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,741, dated Jan. 14, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,252, dated Dec. 20, 2013. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,385, dated Nov. 6, 2013. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 29/387,171, dated May 2, 2012. |
| Response to OA from U.S. Appl No. 29/387,171, filed Aug. 2, 2012. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,385, dated Apr. 26, 2013. |
| Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,385, filed Jul. 24, 2013. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745, dated Jul. 16, 2013. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 29/366,970, dated Jun. 19, 2012. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 29/366,970, dated Jun. 24, 2012. |
| Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 29/368,970, filed Nov. 26, 2012. |
| Preliminary Report and Written Opinion from PCT appl. No. PCT/US2012/047084, dated Feb. 6, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/787,727, dated Jan. 29, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,080, dated Feb. 18, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,924, dated Mar. 10, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,080, dated Apr. 18, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,385, dated Mar. 11, 2014. |
| First Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 2012800369142, dated Mar. 26, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745, dated Apr. 2, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/442,746, dated Apr. 28, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,217, dated May 13, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,348, dated May 27, 2015. |
| Reasons for Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2013-543207, dated May 20, 2014. |
| First Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 2011800529984, dated May 4, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/544,662, dated May 5, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/844,431, dated May 15, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,741, dated Jun. 6, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentabiliby from PCT/US2012/071800 dated Jul. 10, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,535, dated Jun. 20, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,924, dated Jun. 25, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,630, dated Jul. 1, 2014. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745, dated Jul. 16, 2014. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion from PCT/US2013/021053, dated Aug. 21, 2019. |
| Communication from European Patent Appl. No. 13701525.1-1757, dated Sep. 26, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/074,762, filed Mar. 2008, Jacobson, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/442,311, filed Apr. 2012, Lu, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/763,270, filed Feb. 2010, Heeter, et al. |
| Final Rejection issued in Korean Design Appl. No. 30-2011-0038114, dated Jun. 14, 2013. |
| Final Rejection issued in Korean Design Appl. No. 30-2011-0038115, dated Jun. 14, 2013. |
| Final Rejection issued in Korean Design Appl. No. 30-2011-0038116, dated Jun. 17, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2013/035668, dated Jul. 12, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/021053, dated Apr. 17, 2013. |
| Notice to Submit a Response from Korean Patent Application No. 30-2011-0038115, dated Dec. 12, 2012. |
| Notice to Submit a Response from Korean Patent Application No. 30-2011-0038116, dated Dec. 12, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/062396, dated Jul. 13, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/001517, dated: Feb. 27, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/418,796, filed Apr. 6, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,080, filed Mar. 23, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/028,946, filed Feb. 16, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,589, filed Nov. 29, 2011. |
| US Publication No. US 2007/0115671. date: May 24, 2007 to Roberts et al. |
| US Publication No. US 2007/0115670. date: May 24, 2007 to Roberts et al. |
| US Publication No. US 2009/0323334. date: Dec. 31, 2009 to Roberts et al. |
| US Publication No. US 2009/0225543, date: Mar. 5, 2008 to Roberts et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,303, filed Aug. 31, 2010 to Edmond. et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,385, filed Dec. 6, 2010 to Pickard. et al. |
| Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2012/047084, dated Feb. 27, 2013. |
| Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2012/071800, dated Mar. 25, 2013. |
| Office Action from Japanese Design Patent Application No. 2011-18570. |
| Reason for Rejection from Japanese Design Patent Application No. 2011-18571. |
| Reason for Rejection from Japanese Design Patent Application No. 2011-18572. |
| Energy Star® Program Requirements for Solid State Lighting Luminaires. Eligibility Criteria—Version 1.1, final: Dec. 19, 2008. |
| Assist Recommends . . . LED Life for General Lighting: Definition of Life, vol. 1, Issue 1, Feb. 2005. |
| “IES Approved Method for Measuring Lumen Maintenance of LED light Sources”. Sep. 22, 2008. ISBN No. 978-0-87995-227-3. (LM-80). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,052, filed Oct. 10, 2012, Lowes, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/649,067, filed Oct. 10, 2012, Lowes, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/207,204, filed Aug. 10, 2011, Athalye, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,844. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,618, filed Oct. 29, 2012, Athalye, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/462,388, filed May 2, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,150, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Dixon, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,389, filed Feb. 19, 2013, Lowes, et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,820, filed Mar. 1, 2013, Dixon, et al. |
| First Official Action from European Patent Appl. No. 12 743 003.1-1757, dated Jan. 16, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,303, dated Jun. 22, 2015. |
| Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,303, filed Aug. 21, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,741, dated Jun. 22, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,630, dated Jun. 23, 2015. |
| Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/443,630, filed Aug. 21, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,535, dated Jul. 14, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,924, dated Jul. 21, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/442,746, dated Jul. 27, 2015. |
| Notice of Completion of Pretrial Re-examination from Japanese Patent appl. No. 2013-543207, dated Jun. 30, 2015. |
| Pretrial Report from Japanese Appl. No. 2013-543207, dated Jun. 19, 2015. |
| Decision of Rejection from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201160052998.4, dated Jul. 16, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/429,080, dated Sep. 1, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 19/716,480, dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/170,627, dated Oct. 5, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,217, dated Oct. 8, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745, dated Oct. 8, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 29/466,391, dated Oct. 14, 2015. |
| Examination Report from Taiwanese Patent Appl. No. 100131021, dated Jan. 5, 2016. |
| Examination from European Patent Appl. No. 12743003.1-1757, dated Jan. 8, 2016. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2013-543207, dated Feb. 2, 2016. |
| Examination from European Patent Appl. No. 13 701 525.1-1757, dated Feb. 3, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,535; Jan. 6, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/341,741; Jan. 8, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/873,303; Feb. 2, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/961,385, dated Nov. 27, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,348, dated Nov. 4, 2015. |
| First Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 2011800588770, dated Sep. 25, 2015. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745; Mar. 1, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/716,480; Mar. 3, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,217; Mar. 4, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,535; Mar. 18, 2016. |
| Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 29/466,391; May 10, 2016. |
| Second Office Action for Application No. 2011800588770; Dated Mar. 29, 2016. |
| Examination Report from Taiwan Application No. 100131021; Dated Jul. 21, 2016. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/716,480; Dated Aug. 26, 2016. |
| European Summons for Oral Proceedings for Application No. 12743003.1; Dated Sep. 2, 2016. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,745; Dated Sep. 7, 2016. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,348; Dated Jun. 2, 2016. |
| Notice of Reason for Rejection for Japanese Appl. No. 2013-541207; Dated May 24, 2016. |
| Notification of Reexamination for Chinese Application No. 2011800529984: Dated Oct. 10, 2016. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,348 Dated Oct. 17, 2016. |
| Office Action for European Application No. 11754767.9; Dated Oct. 31, 2016. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/873,303 Dated Nov. 25, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance for Taiwan Application No. 100131021: Dated Nov. 28, 2016. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/368,217; Dated Jan. 3, 2017. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140078728 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12961385 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Child | 14020757 | US |