1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to light sources utilizing light emitting diodes (LEDs). In particular, the present invention relates to aviation signal lights providing omnidirectional patterns, such as a runway edge light, obstruction light and similar, where requirements for specific light distribution across the pattern are mandatory.
2. Discussion of Relevant Prior Art
Signal lights such as airfield lights and aviation obstruction lights require certification by the government (Federal Aviation Authority) or international organizations (ICAO). These specifications identify photometrics in detail. For example, ICAO specifications for medium intensity flashing red obstruction lights call for peak intensity minimum 2000 candelas + or −25% at horizontal level and allow maximum intensity limited by 75% of peak at −1%, with beam spread 3°. Application of solid-state technology (LEDs) as a light source because of the low power consumption, long lifetime, and smaller and lighter-weight design, makes it possible to overcome major disadvantages of conventional light sources, such as incandescent and halogen lamps. However, the solid-state technology's total efficiency in a luminaire, in practice, does not exceed 60%. This is why the performance of LED-based signal lights depends on implanted optics, specifically secondary optics light transformers which transforms light emitted by LEDs into light patterns required by specifications. In order to increase LED luminaire performance up to 85% to 90%, non-imaging light transformers, refractive and reflective (including total internal reflection properties) can be implemented. The method of design based on use, both the specifics parameters of the particular light source (such as LED spatial light distribution) and required light distribution across the pattern as a light transformer's design parameters are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,911.
The present invention provides a LED light module (combination of LED and optic) based on light transformer with reflective surface profile (including total internal reflection surface profile) being calculated by taking into account specific LED parameters (spatial intensity distribution), required intensity distribution across emitted pattern and the geometrical relation of components. A single or multiple LED can be used to produce omnidirectional light distribution in a horizontal plane wherein the angle in the vertical plan remains limited. The LED module also can include an optical window and LED heatsink.
According to one aspect of the present invention the light module comprises at least one LED emitting light with a wide divergency and rotationally symmetrical reflective light transformer having a vertex located on the light transformer's axis of symmetry, which is coincidental with the LED axis. The light transformer reflective surface profile is determined by LED spatial intensity distribution across emitted pattern and light module geometry. The light transformer collects light emitted by the LED, compresses, redistributes, and directs the collected light with high efficiency in an omnidirectional pattern with pre-calculated intensity distribution.
According to the second aspect of the present invention, which is related to particular case when angular distribution is smaller than LED half-angle distribution, the reflective light transformer surface includes a plurality of circular facets, each facet profile being determined by LED spatial intensity distribution, required intensity distribution across emitted pattern and light module geometry. Each facet collects a portion of the light emitted by the LED, compresses, redistributes, and directs the collected light with efficiency in the same limited angle pattern in a vertical plane and a superposition of light pattern from all facets resulting in an omnidirectional pattern with pre-calculated intensity distribution.
In an alternative embodiment the light module comprising a plurality of LEDs, each LED emitting light with wide divergency, and reflective light transformer including a plurality of identical concave curved segments, each segment corresponds to an LED. The LED axes are parallel to the reflective light transformer axis. In a plane perpendicular to the LED optical axes the LED form a substantially circular array with the center of the circle located on the reflective light transformer axis. The concave curved segment's reflective surface profile is determined by the LED spatial intensity distribution, required intensity distribution across the emitted pattern and light module geometry. Each segment of the reflective light transformer collects light emitted by an associated LED, compresses, redistributes and directs the collected light with high efficiency in a limited angle in the plane perpendicular to the LED optical axis and superposition of pattern from a plurality of segments providing an omnidirectional pattern with a pre-calculated intensity distribution.
In another similar embodiment, the reflective light transformer's concave curved segment's surface includes a plurality of facets. Each facet reflective surface profile is determined by the corresponding portion of the LED spatial intensity distribution, required intensity distribution across emitted pattern and light module geometry. Each facet collects a portion of the light emitted by the corresponding LED from a circular array, compresses, redistributes, and directs the collected light with high efficiency in a limited angle pattern in the vertical plane and superposition of the light pattern from all facts in the vertical plane and all segments in the plane perpendicular to the LED optical axes resulting in an omnidirectional pattern with pre-calculated intensity distribution.
In another embodiment, the light module comprising a plurality of LEDs, each LED emitting light with wide divergence and a reflective light transformer including a plurality of identical concave curved segments. The LEDs optical axes are parallel to the reflective light transformer axis and in a plane perpendicular to LEDs optical axes wherein the LEDs are forming substantially polygon array with an equal number of LEDs in each polygon side, and the number of polygon sides are equal to number of concave curved segments, and each segment corresponds to a polygon side. The concave curved segments' reflective surface profile is determined by a combination of the spatial intensity distribution of all the LEDs located on a corresponding polygon side, required intensity distribution across emitted pattern and light module geometry. Each segment of the reflective light transformer collects light emitted by all the LEDs located on the corresponding polygon side, compresses, redistributes and directs collected light with high efficiency in a limited angle pattern in a plane perpendicular to the LEDS optical axes, and superposition of the pattern from a plurality of segments provides an omnidirectional pattern with pre-calculated intensity distribution.
Yet in another similar embodiment, the reflective light transformer's concave curved segment's surface consists of a plurality of facets. The facet's reflective surface profile is determined by combining the spatial intensity distribution of all LEDs located on the corresponding polygon side, required intensity distribution across emitted pattern and light module geometry. Each facet collects a portion of the light emitted by the LEDs located on the corresponding polygon side, compresses redistributes and directs collected light with high efficiency in a limited angle patter in the plane perpendicular to the LEDs optical axes and a superposition of the light pattern from all facets and all the segments resulting in an omni-directional pattern with pre-calculated intensity distribution.
A clear understanding of the various advantages and features of the present invention, as well as the construction and operation of conventional components and mechanisms associated with the present invention, will become more readily apparent by referring to the exemplary, and therefore non-limiting, embodiments illustrated in the following drawings which accompany and form a part of this patent specification.
a) and (b) are top view and perspective view of the light module according to another embodiment.
a) and (b) are top view and perspective view of the light module according to another embodiment.
a) and (b) are top view and perspective view of the light module according to another embodiment.
a) and (b) are top view and perspective view of the light module according to another embodiment.
In operation, the light emitted by the LED 100 with given spatial intensity distribution is reflected by the reflective light transformer surface 230, transformed and directed omnidirectionally in 360° pattern 40, with a pre-calculated intensity distribution. In order to achieve high efficiency (80% and higher) the light transformer should be designed to take into account both the specifics of the light sources (such as the LED spatial intensity distribution) and the desirable light distribution across the emitted pattern.
The method of reflective light transformer surface profile design using light source spatial intensity distribution and required intensity distribution across the emitted pattern as design conditions is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,911 and illustrated in
The optical axis 110 of light source (LED) 100 is coincidental with the axis of symmetry 210 of rotationally symmetrical reflective light transformer 200, having vertex 220 located on the axis of symmetry. The reflective light transformer's surface profile 230 is calculated as a step-by-step iterative procedure using a given light source spatial distribution in the emitted pattern. For example, arbitrary point 231 of reflective transformer surface reflects ray 120, emitted by light source 100 on an angular coordinate 130 relative to light source optical axis 110, belonging to the light source domain. To transfer the portion of the light energy corresponding to this direction into an emitted pattern, the reflected ray 250 must be reflected on an angular coordinate 260 relative to axis 241 in a pattern domain, which is orthogonal to the axis of symmetry 210. The orthogonal coordinates 211 and 241 are parallel to coordinates 210 and 240 respectively and the origin located in arbitrary point 231. As a result, the curvature of the reflective transformer surface profile in the arbitrary point 231 will be determined by the angular coordinate 280 of tangent 270 to the profile in the arbitrary point 231, relative to the transformer axis of symmetry 210.
a) and (b) are top and perspective views respectively of the light module 700 according to another embodiment. The light module 700 comprising a plurality of LEDs 400 and a reflective light transformer 800, which consists of a plurality of identical concave curved segments 810. The LED's axes are parallel to reflective transformer 800 axis 820. In a plane perpendicular to LEDs optical axes LEDs 400 form substantially a polygon array 430 with an equal numbers of LEDs in each polygon side, the number of polygon sides equal to the number of concave curved segments 810, and each segment 810 corresponds to a side of the polygon array 430. The polygon array center 440 located on reflective transformer's 800 axis 820. The concave curved segment's reflective surface profile is determined by combining the spatial intensity distribution of all the LEDs located on the corresponding polygon side, required intensity distribution across emitted pattern and the light module 700 geometry. Each segment 810 of the reflective light transformer 800 collects light emitted by all the LEDs, compresses, redistributes and directs the collected light with high efficiency in a limited angle pattern 900 in a plane perpendicular to the LEDs optical axes and superposition of pattern 900 from plurality of segments 800 providing an ominidirectional pattern with a pre-calculated intensity distribution.
a) and (b) are top and perspective views respectively of the light module 710 according to another embodiment. The light module 710 comprising a plurality of LEDs 400 and a reflective light transformer 800, which consists of a plurality of identical concave curved segments 580. The LED's 400 axes are parallel to the reflective transformer 800 axis 820. In a plane perpendicular to LEDs optical axes, the LED 400 form a substantially polygon array 430 with equal numbers of LEDs in each polygon side, the number of polygon sides equal to the number of concave curved segments 810, and each segment 810 corresponding to a side of the polygon array 430. The polygon array 430 center 440 is located on the reflective transformer's 800 axis 820. The concave curved segment's 810 surface profile consists of a plurality of facets 830. The facet reflective surface profile is determined by a portion of the combined spatial intensity distribution of all the LEDs located on the corresponding polygon side, the required intensity distribution across the emitted pattern and the light module 710 geometry. A surface profile of each of the concave curved segments is defined by an equation R[(α,β); θ]=F{ΣnIs(α,β); Ip(θ)} where R[(α,β);θ] is a surface profile of each of the concave curved segments, α, β are two dimensional angular coordinates belonging to a light source domain, θ is an angular coordinate relative to an orthogonal axis to an axis of symmetry of the reflective light transformer belonging to a pattern domain, ΣnIs(α,β) is a combined spatial intensity distribution of all the LEDs located on a corresponding polygon side, n is a number of the LEDs on a polygon side, Ip(θ) is a required intensity distribution across an emitted pattern, and F{ } is an arbitrary function determined by a method of design. Each facet 830 collects a portion of the light emitted by all the LEDs located on the corresponding side of the polygon array 430, compresses, redistributes and directs the collected light with high efficiency in a limited angle pattern 910 in the vertical plane and superposition of light pattern 910 from all facets 830 in the vertical plane, and all limited angle pattern 900 in the plane perpendicular to the LEDs optical axes from a plurality of segments 810 provides an ominidirectional pattern with a pre-calculated intensity distribution.
While we have shown and described the preferred embodiments of my invention, it will be understood that the invention may be embodied otherwise than as herein specifically illustrated or described, and that certain changes in form and arrangement of parts and the specific manner of practicing the invention may be made within the underlying idea or principles of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/277,230, filed Oct. 21, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,503,669; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/566,521, filed May 8, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,911 and is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1676463 | Ryan | Jul 1928 | A |
1888995 | Matter | Nov 1932 | A |
2215900 | Bitner | Sep 1940 | A |
2589569 | Peter et al. | Mar 1952 | A |
3610912 | Schwartz | Oct 1971 | A |
3852584 | Levin | Dec 1974 | A |
3875561 | Scarpino et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4337759 | Popovich et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4355350 | Mader | Oct 1982 | A |
4382274 | De Backer et al. | May 1983 | A |
4617768 | Gebelius | Oct 1986 | A |
4678269 | Pace | Jul 1987 | A |
4767172 | Nichols et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768133 | Simons et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4826273 | Tinder et al. | May 1989 | A |
4915484 | Yamamoto | Apr 1990 | A |
5103381 | Uke | Apr 1992 | A |
5105347 | Ruud et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134550 | Young | Jul 1992 | A |
5136483 | Schoniger et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5161874 | Benes | Nov 1992 | A |
5180221 | Yoder | Jan 1993 | A |
5289356 | Winston | Feb 1994 | A |
5321717 | Adachi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5363469 | Elderfield | Nov 1994 | A |
5408395 | Schmid et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5467335 | Braat | Nov 1995 | A |
5469347 | Duve et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471371 | Koppolu et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5553174 | Snyder | Sep 1996 | A |
5556189 | Wallis | Sep 1996 | A |
5575550 | Appeldorn et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592578 | Ruh | Jan 1997 | A |
5621829 | Ford | Apr 1997 | A |
5629996 | Rizkin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642933 | Hitora | Jul 1997 | A |
5661828 | Riser et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5694112 | VannRox et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704709 | Zwick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707130 | Zwick et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5775792 | Wiese | Jul 1998 | A |
5785410 | Branson, Sr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800050 | Leadford | Sep 1998 | A |
5813743 | Naka | Sep 1998 | A |
5854872 | Tai | Dec 1998 | A |
5926320 | Parkyn, Jr. et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929788 | Vukosic | Jul 1999 | A |
5931575 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951144 | Gavigan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6013985 | Green et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028535 | Rizkin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6048083 | McDermott | Apr 2000 | A |
6075650 | Morris et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097549 | Jenkins et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107916 | Beck et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6132072 | Turnbull et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155703 | Rizkin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168294 | Erni et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6210017 | Miura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217197 | Siminovitch et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234646 | Ito | May 2001 | B1 |
6334699 | Gladnick | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6380864 | Richard | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402347 | Maas et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6450661 | Okumura | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464373 | Petrick | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6547423 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6565239 | Rizkin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568827 | Forster | May 2003 | B2 |
6637921 | Coushaine | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6899443 | Rizkin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7160004 | Peck | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7568821 | Peck et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020136027 | Hansler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030189832 | Rizkin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193807 | Rizkin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050190559 | Kragl | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060209541 | Peck | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060268549 | Oehlke | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
87107021 | Apr 1988 | CN |
2201574 | Jul 1973 | DE |
4128995 | Aug 1991 | DE |
4129094 | Sep 1991 | DE |
4305585 | Feb 1993 | DE |
4243175 | Jun 1994 | DE |
19507234 | Feb 1995 | DE |
19507234 | Sep 1996 | DE |
29708858 | May 1997 | DE |
19647094 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19728354 | Jan 1999 | DE |
19739173 | Mar 1999 | DE |
0635744 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0766115 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0780265 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0798788 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0798788 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0762515 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0942225 | Mar 1999 | EP |
61147585 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61147585 | Jul 1986 | JP |
63033879 | Feb 1988 | JP |
1125719 | May 1989 | JP |
9901695 | Jul 1997 | WO |
9909349 | Aug 1997 | WO |
0024062 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0024062 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Trigonometric functions. (2003) In the Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/316,642 (USP 6,814,470), dated Feb. 20, 2004. |
Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 10/316,642 (USP 6,814,470), dated Aug. 10, 2004. |
Examiner Interview in U.S. Appl. No. 10/316,642 (USP 6,814,470), dated Aug. 10, 2004. |
Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,524 (USP 6,902,291), dated Dec. 16, 2004. |
Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,423, dated Dec. 9, 2009. |
Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,327 (USP 6,951,418), dated Mar. 22, 2005. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,327 (USP 6,951,418), dated Dec. 12, 2003. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/391,327 (USP 6,951,418), dated Jun. 9, 2004. |
Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 10/408,923 (USP 6,899,443), dated Jan. 24, 2005. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/408,923 (USP 6,899,443), dated Jul. 13, 2004. |
Communication from EPO related to European Patent Application No. 06016404.3, dated Nov. 30, 2009. |
EPO Examination in 019357631, dated Apr. 29, 2005. |
EPO Search Report in 019357631, dated Dec. 29, 2004. |
International Search Report for PCT/US04/23037, dated Mar. 28, 2005. |
International Search Report for PCT/US03/33227, dated Sep. 1, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/081981, dated Feb. 2, 2009. |
Notice of Allowability in U.S. Appl. No. 11/930,423, dated Mar. 23, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080192480 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10277230 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 11933248 | US | |
Parent | 09566521 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10277230 | US |