None
None—Not Applicable
None
The invention is directed to be a hand portable exercise and training machine to improve the user's initial linear quickness and speed from a set or stationary position. This machine is designed to give coaches, trainers, athletes, or bodybuilders at any level a functional, portable alternative to the larger stationary gym based equipment that exploits this same range of functional muscular movement of the legs. It also has a quite positive aesthetic effect on the user's legs. This machine can be used at any stage of periodization: Anatomical Adaptation, Hypertrophy, Maximum strength, Conversion to power, or Maintenance phase. Also, at low resistance it can be utilized in dynamic warm-ups. This machine's function and portability make it a must for any team or individual with a need for speed-development or enhancement.
Endelman et al in U.S. Pat. No. 6,971,976 developed a concept of a movable carriage on a horizontal frame operating against elastic or spring resistance devices. The elastic or spring resistance is applied from the movable carriage to the fixed position, horizontal frame. This Endelman et al exercise machine positions the user in a recumbent, horizontal (laying down) orientation and exercises the user's body trunk and legs in that position. Due to the user position (recumbent instead of upright—standing), the Endelman et al machine is designed to exercise different user muscle groups than those exercised by the machine proposed in this application.
Sleamaker in U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,427 developed a device using movable foot pads connected by cables to a spring loaded one-way clutch driver. The spring loaded one-way clutch driver is also connected by cables to elevated “ski pole” hand grips. The Sleamaker exercise machine positions the user in an upright, standing orientation but the leg movement is restricted to a lateral (sideways) direction. The lateral direction restriction simulates the side ways motion required by ice skating and cross-country skiing. Due to this lateral leg motion direction restriction, the Sleamaker machine is designed to exercise different user leg muscle groups than those exercised by the machine proposed in this application.
Both Endelman et al and Sleamaker employ standard engineering techniques such as telescoping, removable or collapsing features to enhance the portability or storability of their exercise equipment. The machine proposed in this application also employs telescoping and removable features to enhance the portability or storability.
The key to successful linear sprinting is a powerful and technically sound initial drive phase which comprises the first six to eight steps of a sprint. The first step out of the blocks requires the runner to achieve triple extension of the hip, knee, and ankle joints. Then the runner must hold a 45 degree angle from toe off to head, in order to place maximum force into the ground, this angle trains the “acceleration vector.” This first six to eight steps is not easy to train or develop. So by putting the runner in the start position per the machine defined in this application, the runner can then work the first step against the resistance of the springs to full extension of the hip, knee, and ankle and gain maximal range of motion strength.
The acceleration vector mentioned above, comes from load vector terminology, which can be used to clarify the differences between Endelman's reformer exercise apparatus which trains the jump vector, Sleamaker's skating and skiing simulator, which trains the cutting vector. Whereas, the machine proposed in this application trains the acceleration vector.
In order to understand load vector training terminology, you simply need to analyze which direction the load is moving in relation to the human body. Muscular activation is directly correlated to the directional load vector. The primary load vectors can be defined as follows:
Athletes need to prepare for all the vectors related to their sport. It is very difficult to keep things simple and train all the various load vectors. Usually, the jump vector is heavily loaded in the weight room and the other vectors are trained with bodyweight only on the field through speed and agility training. Training more vectors in the athlete's strength program will maximize performance and reduce injuries. The machine defined in this application is targeted to train both a movement and its associated muscles. The targeted movement being trained is the acceleration vector as defined above.
In summary, the Endelman et al and Sleamaker exercise machines' are designed to exercise very different user muscle groups than those exercised by the machine proposed in this application. The Endelman et al and Sleamaker designs position the user in different body orientations and the user's motions when using these devices are very different than the machine proposed in this application. The machine proposed in this application is primarily targeted at leg muscles used to initiated and maintain forward motion as employed during running or walking and during the initiation of those activities. Again, the user orientation and exercise motions for the machine proposed in this application are very different than either the Endelman et al or Sleamaker exercise machines.
Beyond the differentiating details provided above, the applicants offer the following arguments further citing why this proposed patent is structurally unique when compared to previously patented devices. These differences are as follows:
In summary, the structural design of this proposed exercise machine has unique features to enable a full range of kickback motion with the proper body orientation of the user. This proposed design is very different than prior patents because of the unique structural configuration of the proposed exercise machine as described above. The above structural features of the proposed exercise machine substantially differentiate it from the Endelman et al and Sleamaker patents or a composite of both.
This device is a hand portable exercise machine targeted at improving a user's quick start capability from a set or stationary position. The machine applies dynamic progressive spring resistance, where the resistance increases as the movement of the leg continues through the full exercise range. From the beginning of a sprint in any sport, body alignment is crucial to maximize leg drive into the ground. This machine allows for proper anatomical positioning, thus ensuring both safety and maximum muscle development as it applies to leg drive (leg extending out and away from the torso (upper body)).
The leg exercise machine 10 consists of a horizontal beam 15 that is elevated above the floor from 10 to 20 inches by adjustable legs 13. The beam height adjustment above the floor is to enable the most comfortable user height configuration. The height of the front and rear leg assemblies 13 can be independently adjusted to slope the horizontal beam to increase or decrease the amount of force required. The width of the leg assembly 13 at the floor surface is approximately 18 inches to provide adequate lateral stability. On the horizontal beam 15, are mounted a movable foot sled 12, a stationary spring retainer bracket 16 and a removable handle bar post assembly 11. The stationary spring retainer bracket 16 and handle bar post assembly 11 are mounted near the front of the horizontal beam. This assembly can be viewed in elevation and plan on Drawing—
The foot sled assembly 12 slides on the horizontal beam. Springs 14 are attached to the front of the foot sled 12 and the opposite end of the springs 14 are attached to a stationary retainer bracket 16 adjacent to the vertical handle bar post 11. The springs 14 are about 22 inches in length, similar to standard garage door springs and can have a rating of up to 100 pounds force each when fully extended. Each spring 14 is attached at each end with removable clips 22. The number of interconnecting springs 14 can be changed from one (1) up to four (4) depending on the level of force desired by the user.
Also, the force rating of the springs 14 can be changed to suit the user by replacing them with differently rated springs. The vertical height of the handle bar stand post 11 can be adjusted via a lower 23 and upper 24 section to the user's preferred height.
The angle of the foot plate 18 on the foot sled 12 is also adjustable to the user's preference. The foot plat 18 angle is adjusted via a two piece support member 19 with a retaining pin 21 that is placed at the desired angle to maintain the foot plate 18 in that position. The foot plate is secured to the sled at its base by a hinge attachment. The foot plate two piece support member 19 consists of a bottom piece and a movable vertical member foot plate. The foot plate support vertical member allows the user to select a plate angle.
The foot plate 18 has an adhesively attached synthetic rubberized surface 20 for interfacing with the user's foot. The foot sled assembly 12 has a pad 28 at its base to minimize friction forces during sled movement along the horizontal beam 15. As noted above, the slope of the horizontal beam 15 can be adjusted by differing the support leg assembly 13 heights at each beam end to the increase or decrease the force needed to be applied by the user. Each leg assembly 13 is two piece 25 & 27 with a telescoping vertical section that can be secured in the desired position. These feature details are depicted in
The machine requires the user to straddle it facing the handle bar post assembly 11 taking hold of the handle bar 24 with both hands for stability and to counter leg movement forces. The user then places the leg he or she intends to exercise above and in line with the machine with the foot of the leg being exercised pressed against the foot plate 18 on the sled 12. The user's other leg remains firmly on the floor or ground. The user now tucks his or her torso and head in line with the machine with the working leg at a 90 degree angle with the body core engaged. The user is now in the correct position to execute this exercise.
To initiate the movement, begin pressing back with the heel of working leg thus engaging the gluteus maximus, concentrically and the hamstrings (biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus), eccentrically to cause hip extension first. Then, as the exercised leg extends, quickly joined by the quadriceps group (rectus, femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and vastus intermedialis) which concentrically create extension at the knee—then at full extension of the hip and knee the user applies pressure through the ball of the foot just behind the toes, engaging the gasrocnemius and soleus muscles concentrically to plantar flex (extend) the ankle. Thereby, completely extending the hip, knee, and ankle joints at the finish of the movement, allowing the spring force to reverse this movement returns the user to the starting position.
This machine is designed to give coaches, trainers, athletes, or bodybuilders at any level a functional, portable alternative to the larger stationary gym based equipment that exploits this same range of functional muscular movement of the legs. It also has a quite positive aesthetic effect on the user's legs. This machine can be used at any stage of periodization: Anatomical Adaptation, Hypertrophy, Maximum strength, Conversion to power, or Maintenance phase. At low resistance, it can also be utilized in dynamic warm-ups. This machine's function and portability make it a must for any team or individual with a need for speed-development or enhancement.
The movement of the foot sled 12 is resisted by a variable number of springs 14. As such, it is recommended that the user fully learns the technique involved with proper posture and fully develops the strength required to complete 15-20 repetitious at low resistance before adding an additional springs.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1738987 | Dattilo | Dec 1929 | A |
| 1750549 | Thomson et al. | Mar 1930 | A |
| 1866868 | Hardy et al. | Jul 1932 | A |
| 1950174 | Harrison | Mar 1934 | A |
| 1996350 | Schaff | Apr 1935 | A |
| 2440577 | Denby | Apr 1948 | A |
| 2720396 | Pfaus | Oct 1955 | A |
| 3620530 | Cosby | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3749400 | Stoffel | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3754547 | Walker | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3770267 | McCarthy | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3992004 | Feron et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4111417 | Gardner | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4522392 | Torii | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4619454 | Walton | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4706953 | Graham | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4809976 | Berger | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4867443 | Jensen | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4930769 | Nenoff | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5279530 | Hess | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5295935 | Wang | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5328427 | Sleamaker | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330398 | Barbafieri et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5338278 | Endelman | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5364327 | Graham | Nov 1994 | A |
| D362700 | Breibart et al. | Sep 1995 | S |
| 5499958 | Hess | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5518483 | Oswald | May 1996 | A |
| 5607381 | Endelman | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5620403 | Lundin | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5653670 | Endelman | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5681249 | Endelman | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5792079 | Hatfield | Aug 1998 | A |
| 6001051 | Chuan-Pin | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6042523 | Graham | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6071217 | Barnett | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6120425 | Endelman | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6149554 | Ferguson | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6186929 | Endelman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6238322 | Hsu | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6338704 | Endelman | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6371895 | Endelman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6527685 | Endelman et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6585625 | Ferguson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6589142 | McAfee, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6685606 | Endelman | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6872186 | Branch et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6926650 | Endelman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6971976 | Endelman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7044898 | Kuo et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7104937 | Arbuckle et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7125368 | Endelman | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7125369 | Endelman | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7163500 | Endelman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7232404 | Nelson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7288053 | Endelman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7288054 | Endelman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7438673 | Jones | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7682297 | Graham | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7722512 | Liang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7803095 | LaGree | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7874968 | Foucault | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7878951 | Roman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 20010056011 | Endelman et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020058573 | Endelman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20030032534 | McAfee, Jr. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119636 | Endelman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195095 | Endelman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040053752 | Yang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138029 | Brausen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167000 | Schwarz | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176227 | Endelman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050113226 | Endelman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113227 | Endelman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20060199712 | Barnard et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20090118108 | Uygan | May 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090203507 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |