Intraocular implants such as an intraocular lens (“IOL”) can be delivered into the eye through a small incision made in the cornea. Delivery devices have been developed to aid in the delivery and insertion of such implants into the eye.
A corneal or scleral incision allows access to the eye and the smaller the incision the less damage will be done and the less time will be needed for the incision to heal. In addition, the intraocular lens is preferably not damaged during delivery, or at most, minimally damaged such that it will not effect the functionality of the intraocular lens.
Depending on the physical characteristics of the intraocular lens (e.g., shape, size, etc.), the shape and/or configuration of the intraocular lens may need to be reduced in size or altered during the delivery process to enable the intraocular lens to be inserted through a small incision. The reduction in size or adjustment of the configuration/shape of the lens allows for a smaller delivery profile.
A delivery device is therefore needed that will reduce the delivery profile of the intraocular lens such that it can be delivered into the eye through a small incision. Additionally, the delivery device minimizes and preferably eliminates damage done to the lens during the delivery process, including the loading of the intraocular lens into the delivery device.
One aspect of the invention is a method of hydraulically loading an intraocular lens into a delivery system. The method includes positioning an intraocular lens within a compression chamber and adjacent a delivery device, wherein the compression chamber and the delivery device are in fluid communication. The method includes flowing a fluid through the compression chamber and into the delivery device, wherein flowing the fluid through the compression chamber comprises loading the intraocular lens into the delivery device.
In some embodiments loading the intraocular lens into the delivery device comprises compressing the intraocular lens from an unstressed expanded configuration to a stressed delivery configuration. Compressing the intraocular lens can increase the length of the intraocular lens. The intraocular lens can comprise a fluid therein, and wherein compressing the intraocular lens comprises redistributing the fluid with the intraocular lens.
In some embodiments the intraocular lens comprises an optic portion, a first haptic, and a second haptic, and wherein positioning the intraocular lens within the compression chamber comprises positioning the first haptic distal to the optic portion.
One aspect of the invention is a hydraulic loading system for loading an ophthalmic device into a delivery device. The system includes a compression chamber with a tapered inner surface, wherein the compression chamber contains a fluid therein. The system includes a delivery device comprising an elongate loading element wherein the elongate loading element and the compression chamber are in fluid communication. The system includes an ophthalmic device disposed in a first configuration within the compression chamber. The system also includes a loading device adapted to cause the fluid to flow through the compression chamber and into the elongate loading element, thereby loading the ophthalmic device into the elongate loading element. In some embodiments the fluid contains a lubricant.
In some embodiments the ophthalmic device is an intraocular lens. In some embodiments the loading device comprises a plunger to direct the fluid through the compression chamber and into the elongate loading element.
One aspect of the invention is a method of loading an intraocular lens into a delivery device. The method comprises providing a delivery device comprising an everting tube comprising an inner tube portion and an outer tube portion, wherein the everting tube is coupled to a first actuation element. The method includes loading the intraocular lens into an end of the everting tube by actuating the first actuation element, wherein actuating the first actuation element everts a section of the outer tube portion into the inner tube portion about the end of the everting tube.
In some embodiments loading the intraocular lens into an end of the everting tube comprises compressing the intraocular lens within the inner tube portion. In some embodiments loading the intraocular lens into an end of the everting tube comprises loading a first haptic into the end of the everting tube before loading an optic portion of the intraocular lens. Loading the first haptic into the end of the everting tube can include forcing a volume of fluid from the first haptic into the optic portion.
In some embodiments loading the intraocular lens into an end of the delivery tube comprises engaging the intraocular lens and the inner tube portion, wherein the inner tube portion compresses the intraocular lens as the everting tube everts. In some embodiments actuating the first element moves the first actuation element in a proximal direction or a distal direction.
One aspect of the invention is a method of loading an intraocular lens into a delivery device. The method includes compressing an intraocular lens from a first configuration to a second configuration within a first portion of the delivery device, wherein compressing the intraocular lens comprises applying a compressive force to the intraocular lens in a direction generally orthogonal to a longitudinal axis of the delivery device. The method also includes actuating a second portion of the delivery device to move the second portion of the delivery device relative to the first portion of the delivery device in a direction generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the delivery device, wherein actuating the second portion relative to the first portion loads the intraocular lens into the delivery device.
In some embodiments applying a compressive force to the intraocular lens comprises applying the compressive force indirectly to the first portion of the intraocular lens. In some embodiments applying a compressive force to the intraocular lens comprises applying the compressive force directly to a third portion of the intraocular lens, wherein the method further comprises engaging the third portion and the first portion.
In some embodiments the first portion and the second portion slidingly engage one another, and wherein actuating a second portion comprises sliding the second portion over the first portion. The delivery device can include a third portion engaging an outer surface of the first portion, and wherein sliding the second portion over the first portion displaces the third portion from the first portion.
In some embodiments compressing the intraocular lens within a first portion of the delivery device comprises moving a first half of the first portion closer to a second half of the first portion.
One aspect of the invention is a loading system for loading an intraocular lens into a delivery device. The system comprises an outer loading tube adapted to be inserted through an incision in the eye and an inner sleeve slidingly engaged with the outer loading tube and adapted to be disposed within the outer loading tube. The inner sleeve is adapted to engage an intraocular lens therein. The system includes a compressing member disposed adjacent an outer surface of the inner sleeve.
In some embodiments the inner sleeve comprises a first sleeve element and a second sleeve element, and wherein the first sleeve element and the second sleeve element are disposed apart from one another in a first configuration and are moved towards one another in a delivery configuration, thereby compressing the intraocular lens.
In some embodiments the compressing member comprises a first compressing element and a second compressing element, and the first compressing element engages an outer surface of the first sleeve element and the second compressing element engages an outer surface of the second sleeve element. The first compressing element and the second compressing element can be disposed apart from one another in a first configuration and are moved towards one another in a second configuration. The outer loading tube can be adapted to be actuated to displace the compressing member.
In some embodiments the outer loading tube is coupled to a loading tube actuator and the inner sleeve is coupled to an inner sleeve actuator, and wherein actuation of either the loading tube actuator or the inner sleeve actuator moves the outer loading tube relative to the inner sleeve.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
The present invention relates generally to delivery devices for delivering an intraocular implant, such as an IOL, through an incision in an eye. The delivery devices generally compress and increase the length of the IOL (or at least portions of the IOL) into a delivery configuration such that it can be delivered through a small incision, relative to the size of the IOL, into the eye. In addition, the delivery devices minimizes shear and tensile forces to the IOL during the delivery process to minimize and preferably eliminate damage to the IOL.
The IOLs described herein are accommodating IOLs implanted within a lens capsule after the native lens has been removed from the eye. In particular, the IOLs contain flowable media such as a fluid that is, in response to ciliary muscle movement, moved in the IOL to change the power of the IOL. Such exemplary IOLs are described more fully in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/433,046, filed Dec. 12, 2002; U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,122,053; 7,261,737; 7,247,168; and 7,217,288; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/642,388, filed Dec. 19, 2006; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/646,913, filed Dec. 27, 2006, the complete disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. Is it also contemplated that the delivery devices described herein can, however, be used to deliver other types of accommodating IOLs (e.g., non fluid-driven accommodating IOLs), non-accommodating IOLs, and even other types of intraocular implants. In addition, it is contemplated that the delivery devices can be used to deliver the IOL or other ophthalmic device to portions of the eye other than within the lens capsule, such as the anterior chamber or to the posterior chamber after a lens capsule has been removed.
The delivery devices reduce the delivery profile of the IOL by compressing the IOL, or portions of the IOL, from an expanded configuration to a delivery configuration. In some embodiments the IOL assumes a generally circular shape before being loaded of the delivery device, but is compressed into a lengthened generally cylindrical shape by the delivery device. One advantage of the delivery devices is that they minimize the amount and/or types of forces acting on the IOL during the delivery procedure (including the loading and deployment), which can help minimize the amount of damage to the IOL during delivery. This can be advantageous for delicate IOLs (comprised, for example, of polymeric materials) and/or IOLs which comprise a plurality of interconnected components, the mating or bonded elements of which can be damaged by certain types of forces acting on the IOL during a loading and deployment procedure.
In preferred embodiments, the delivery devices minimize shear and tensile forces on the IOL during the delivery process, and instead reshape the IOL under compression.
In use, when the pull block is pulled in the proximal direction (the direction of arrow P in
Similarly, when the pull block is pushed distally, or in direction D, the portion of the belts on the outside and bottom of the inserter body move distally and the portion of the belts on the inside of the inserter body move proximally. This causes the IOL in the inside of the body to move in the proximal direction.
The delivery device is configured so that only the belts and not the inserter body (or as little of the inserter body as possible) engage the IOL. Because the IOL does not make contact with the inserter body (or any other parts of the delivery device that may be added), the inserter body does not apply tensile force or shear forces/stress on the IOL as the IOL is moved by the belts. In addition, because the belts move with the IOL, the amount of shear and tensile forces applied to the IOL by the belts are minimized. As shown in
To deliver the IOL into the eye, the IOL is positioned in the interior of the inserter body, making contact with substantially only the belts. The IOL is positioned in an expanded configuration so it is just barely making contact with the belts (as shown in
When compressing a closed-system fluid-filled IOL (as is shown in 1A-1C and in
It may therefore be advantageous to orient the IOL in the inserter body prior to compression such that fluid will be distributed throughout the IOL in a predictable manner to enable compression and minimize damage to the IOL. For example,
This embodiment may require high tensile forces on the belts, so a pulling mechanism would preferably utilize features designed to increase mechanical advantage. Levers, screws, and/or ratchets could be used to give a user the control as well as the required force.
The inserter body is generally a rigid structure with a general tapered shape with the width decreasing towards the distal end to compress the IOL as it is moved in the distal direction. In some embodiments the distal end of the inserter body is less than about 50% of the width of the proximal end. This is not intended to be a limitation and may be less than about 40%, about 30%, about 20%, about 10%, or less, than the width of the proximal section. While the embodiment shown only includes a bottom surface, the inserter body could also have a top surface (with a similar space as in the bottom surface to avoid sliding). If the inserter body did have a top surface, a fourth belt could then also be included in the device.
The pull block and belts can be made of a relatively rigid material such as Mylar or an elastomeric material such as a silicone.
While three belts are shown in this embodiment there may be more, such as 4, or fewer in the delivery device.
Everting as used herein can refer both to the step when the inner surface of the tube rolls outward and back and becomes an outer surface of the tube, or when an outer surface of the tube rolls inward and becomes an inner surface.
In one embodiment of the everting tube concept as shown in
In addition the inner and outer bodies may be disposed within an outer sheath such that the user of the delivery device would not see the inner and outer bodies. The inner and outer bodies could also be coupled to an actuator such as a control knob which a user could use to carefully control the advancement of the inner body relative to the outer body or the retraction of the outer body relative to the inner body. This could give the user precise control over the delivery of the IOL.
To deliver an IOL into the eye, an IOL is first loaded into the distal end of the delivery device shown in
Because the tube is everting inward and moving with the IOL (similar to the belts in the embodiment shown in
As the handle continues to be pulled in the proximal direction, the IOL continues to be loaded into the outer body as the IOL moves further proximally into the channel. In this embodiment, the compression is accomplished as the hoop forces force the IOL to be compressed as it is drawn into the everting tube.
When compressed into the delivery configuration, the length of IOL 100 increases (as is shown in
To deploy the IOL into the eye (e.g., into the lens capsule of which the native lens has been removed), the distal, or leading, haptic is pushed through the corneal incision and into the capsule. Then inner body 42 is pushed distally (or the outer body is pulled proximally, or both), which causes the everting tube and the loaded IOL to move distally together, deploying the IOL from the delivery device and into the eye by squeezing out through the blooming slit portion of the everting tube. As the optic portion of the IOL begins to be released from the outer body, the fluid moves from the distal haptic to the optic portion, causing the optic portion to expand in volume. Then, as the proximal haptic is released from the delivery device it begins to refill with fluid and increases in volume. Once the IOL has completely been deployed outside of the delivery device (and into the capsule), the IOL has generally returned to its pre-loaded, generally expanded, configuration (although the shape of the IOL may be slightly altered after implantation due to forces acting on the IOL by the lens capsule). The delivery device is then removed from the eye.
In the embodiments shown in
In some embodiments the everting tube is a thin, tough, generally stretchy material that is adapted to be everted. To evert a tube it is generally preferred to be somewhat stretchy and very thin relative to the inner diameter of the tube. A composite material with relatively different axial and circumferential stiffnesses may also be used. For instance, a tube can contain fibers running along the longitudinal axis of the tube that serve to stiffen the tube in the axial direction while maintaining the elastic properties in the circumferential direction. Alternatively, the everting tube can be formed by being drawn to provide extra stiffness along its length.
While the embodiments above show and describe one slit in the everting tube, the delivery device may have more than one slit, such as 2, 3, 4, 5, or more slits. The slits may be positioned around and along the length of the tube in any orientation that helps minimize the shear and tensile forces on the IOL during loading or deployment. In some embodiments the everting tube has no slits.
A variety of actuation mechanisms may be used to deliver the device. For example without limitation, a knob, a trigger, or a lever mounted on a grip may be used as alternatives to the syringe design.
To load the IOL into the delivery device 60, the advancement mechanism is pushed distally to deploy inserter 64 from the distal end of body 62 (as shown in
Once loaded into the delivery device, the IOL can then be inserted through the wound as described above.
Once body 62 has been advanced into the wound advancement mechanism 66 is advanced distally, which begins to deploy the folded inserter from the body. The IOL moves with the inserter as it is advanced out of body 62. As the inserter is pushed from body 62, it begins to unroll, or open, allowing the optic and trailing haptic to begin to expand and again fill with fluid that had been squeezed into the leading haptic when the IOL was in the loaded delivery configuration.
This embodiment may be used with an additional secondary advancement mechanism to further advance the IOL from the rolled inserter. For example, a plunger-like device could be disposed within an internal bore or channel in the advancement mechanism. The plunger-like device could be pushed distally through the advancement mechanism to make contact with the IOL to completely deploy the IOL from the folded inserter. Because the IOL might be in a generally uncompressed state after the inserter has been pushed as far distally as possible, only a small amount of additional force may be needed to completely push the IOL from the folded inserter. Therefore the plunger-like device would not damage the IOL.
An alternative secondary advancement mechanism uses a hydraulic force to fully deploy the IOL from the folder inserter. A lumen within the advancement mechanism can be used to deliver fluid within the inserter thereby forcing the IOL out of the inserter. Fluid will also minimize the amount of shear or tensile forces acting on the IOL. A sealing mechanism such as a plug or other insert (such as a silicone material) can also be positioned into the rolled inserter to help create a seal between the IOL and the inserter to aid in the hydraulic ejection of the IOL.
In general the rolled inserter is a very thin material. In one embodiment the rolled inserter comprises mylar and is about 0.004″ thick. The cross section of the inserter may assume a variety of cross-sectional shapes, such as round, oval, or elliptical.
To load lens 310 into outer tube 302, the intraocular lens is first positioned in the system as shown in
After the compressor clips are compressed to the closed (or substantially closed) position shown in
The outer tube is then advanced through an incision made in the eye. To deploy the lens from the delivery system and into the lens capsule, inner sleeve actuator 324 is advanced distally in direction D. This causes inner sleeve to be advanced distally relative to the outer tube. As the inner sleeve emerges from the distal end of the outer tube, the inner sleeve will begin to split along the slit and the lens will begin to expand. The lens can therefore be delivered into the capsule.
The outer tube is generally rigid and in one embodiment is a stainless steel tube. The inner sleeve is generally a flexible material and in one embodiment is PTFE. The compressor clips can be any suitably rigid material.
Increasing the outer tube volume increases the volume into which the lens can be compressed. It is generally desirable for the outer tube to have the largest cross sectional area possible while still allowing the outer tube to be advanced into the smallest incision possible. It has been found than using an outer tube in which the cross section is generally elliptically-shaped allows the largest cross sectional area through the smallest incision.
In an alternative embodiment the inner sleeve as shown in
To advance the lens into loading tube 408, the plunger is actuated in the distal D direction which causes fluid 414 and lens 402 to be advanced distally towards loading tube 108. The plunger continues to be advanced distally until the lens is forced through proximal end 416 of loading tube 108. By moving the lens with a lubricious material, shear and tensile forces on the lens are minimized.
In an alternative design the intraocular lens can be loaded into the loading tube under vacuum pressure.
After the lens is loaded into the loading tube, the lens is hydraulically delivered into the eye. The loading tube is first detached from the loading apparatus. The loading tube is then inserted through an incision in the eye and a fluid (such as a lubricious fluid) is directed through the loading tube to eject the lens from the loading tube and into the eye. Hydraulic deployment also minimizes shear and tensile forces acting on the lens. A syringe can be used to direct the fluid through the loading tube. Alternatively, a small piston drives down the tube, pushing a short column of fluid distally to the piston. The piston is controlled with an actuator such as a knob, lever, ratchet, etc. The piston can be attached to either end of the loading tube. This means the lens can be ejected from the same end in which it is loaded, or it can be deployed from the other end of the loading tube.
In any or all of the embodiments described herein, the method of delivery includes creating a wound in the eye which generally comprises an incision in the eye. In some embodiments the incision is about 4 mm and preferably about 3.7 mm. The incision can, however, be slightly larger or smaller.
In any of the embodiments described herein, the position and/or orientation of the IOL may need to be adjusted for the loading step. For example, when loading an IOL with haptics, it may be necessary to align the haptics so they are oriented generally along the longitudinal axis of the delivery device before compressing the lens (see, for example,
To compress any of the fluid-filled accommodating IOL described herein, it may be necessary to apply a compressive side force of about 0.5 pounds. This can vary, however, depending on the size, composition, and volume of the IOL.
While only these embodiments have been described, they all attempt to minimize the amount of shear and tensile forces acting on the IOL during the loading and/or delivery process. One common method is minimizing the amount of sliding that occurs between the IOL and the delivery system components. Other embodiments are included in this invention which allow the IOL to be loaded into and deployed from the delivery device with (or in conjunction with) a delivery device component, in order to reduce these unwanted forces.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/951,439, filed Jul. 23, 2007, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4111995 | Nelson | Sep 1978 | A |
4251887 | Anis | Feb 1981 | A |
4253199 | Banko | Mar 1981 | A |
4254509 | Tennant | Mar 1981 | A |
4304895 | Loshaek | Dec 1981 | A |
4373218 | Schachar | Feb 1983 | A |
4409691 | Levy | Oct 1983 | A |
4423809 | Mazzocco | Jan 1984 | A |
4435856 | L'Esperance | Mar 1984 | A |
4466705 | Michelson | Aug 1984 | A |
4490860 | Rainin | Jan 1985 | A |
4494254 | Lopez | Jan 1985 | A |
4512040 | McClure | Apr 1985 | A |
4528311 | Beard et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4575373 | Johnson | Mar 1986 | A |
4585457 | Kalb | Apr 1986 | A |
4600004 | Lopez et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604295 | Humphreys | Aug 1986 | A |
4615701 | Woods | Oct 1986 | A |
4620954 | Singer et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4681102 | Bartell | Jul 1987 | A |
4685921 | Peyman | Aug 1987 | A |
4685922 | Peyman | Aug 1987 | A |
4693717 | Michelson | Sep 1987 | A |
4702244 | Mazzocco | Oct 1987 | A |
4720286 | Bailey et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4731078 | Stoy et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4731079 | Stoy | Mar 1988 | A |
4731080 | Galin | Mar 1988 | A |
4747404 | Jampel et al. | May 1988 | A |
4763650 | Haer | Aug 1988 | A |
4764423 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4765329 | Cumming et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4781719 | Kelman | Nov 1988 | A |
4784485 | Ho | Nov 1988 | A |
4787903 | Grendahl | Nov 1988 | A |
4790847 | Woods | Dec 1988 | A |
4813956 | Gupta | Mar 1989 | A |
4816031 | Pfoff | Mar 1989 | A |
4819631 | Poley | Apr 1989 | A |
4834094 | Patton et al. | May 1989 | A |
4836201 | Patton et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4842601 | Smith | Jun 1989 | A |
4848343 | Wallsten et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4862885 | Cumming | Sep 1989 | A |
4880000 | Holmes et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4888012 | Horn et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4892543 | Turley | Jan 1990 | A |
4902293 | Feaster | Feb 1990 | A |
4906247 | Fritch | Mar 1990 | A |
4911158 | Weatherly | Mar 1990 | A |
4911714 | Poley | Mar 1990 | A |
4917680 | Poley | Apr 1990 | A |
4919130 | Stoy et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919151 | Grubbs et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4932966 | Christie et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4934363 | Smith et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946469 | Sarfarazi | Aug 1990 | A |
4950289 | Krasner | Aug 1990 | A |
4955889 | Van Gent | Sep 1990 | A |
4963148 | Sulc et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4988352 | Poley | Jan 1991 | A |
4994082 | Richards et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4995879 | Dougherty | Feb 1991 | A |
4995880 | Galib | Feb 1991 | A |
5007913 | Dulebohn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015254 | Greite | May 1991 | A |
5026393 | Mackool | Jun 1991 | A |
5035710 | Nakada et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5047051 | Cumming | Sep 1991 | A |
5061914 | Busch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5066301 | Wiley | Nov 1991 | A |
5078740 | Walman | Jan 1992 | A |
5098439 | Hill et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100410 | Dulebohn | Mar 1992 | A |
5123905 | Kelman | Jun 1992 | A |
5145884 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5145935 | Hayashi | Sep 1992 | A |
5152789 | Willis | Oct 1992 | A |
5171241 | Buboltz et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171266 | Wiley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176686 | Poley | Jan 1993 | A |
5190552 | Kelman | Mar 1993 | A |
5200430 | Federman | Apr 1993 | A |
5201763 | Brady et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5213579 | Yamada et al. | May 1993 | A |
5224957 | Gasser et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235003 | Ward et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251993 | Sigourney | Oct 1993 | A |
5275623 | Sarfarazi | Jan 1994 | A |
5275624 | Hara et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5288293 | O'Donnell, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290892 | Namdaran et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304182 | Rheinish et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5326347 | Cumming | Jul 1994 | A |
5354333 | Kammann et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5391590 | Gerace et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5405386 | Rheinish et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425734 | Blake | Jun 1995 | A |
5443506 | Garabet | Aug 1995 | A |
5444106 | Zhou et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444135 | Cheradame et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452932 | Griffin | Sep 1995 | A |
5468246 | Blake | Nov 1995 | A |
5474562 | Orchowski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476514 | Cumming | Dec 1995 | A |
5489302 | Skottun | Feb 1996 | A |
5494484 | Feingold | Feb 1996 | A |
5496328 | Nakajima et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5496366 | Cumming | Mar 1996 | A |
5499987 | Feingold | Mar 1996 | A |
5506300 | Ward et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512609 | Yang | Apr 1996 | A |
5549614 | Tunis | Aug 1996 | A |
5556400 | Tunis | Sep 1996 | A |
5562676 | Brady et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5578081 | McDonald | Nov 1996 | A |
5582613 | Brady et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584304 | Brady | Dec 1996 | A |
5585049 | Grisoni et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593436 | Langerman | Jan 1997 | A |
5607433 | Polla et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607472 | Thompson | Mar 1997 | A |
5616148 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620450 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628795 | Langerman | May 1997 | A |
5633504 | Collins et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643276 | Zaleski | Jul 1997 | A |
5653715 | Reich et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5665822 | Bitler et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674282 | Cumming | Oct 1997 | A |
5676669 | Colvard | Oct 1997 | A |
5697973 | Peyman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702400 | Brown et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702402 | Brady | Dec 1997 | A |
5702441 | Zhou | Dec 1997 | A |
5716364 | Makker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5735858 | Makker et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766182 | McDonald | Jun 1998 | A |
5772666 | Feingold et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774273 | Bornhorst | Jun 1998 | A |
5776138 | Vidal et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776191 | Mazzocco | Jul 1998 | A |
5776192 | McDonald | Jul 1998 | A |
5800442 | Wolf et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803925 | Yang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810834 | Heyman | Sep 1998 | A |
5843188 | McDonald | Dec 1998 | A |
5860984 | Chambers et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868751 | Feingold | Feb 1999 | A |
5873879 | Figueroa et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876440 | Feingold | Mar 1999 | A |
5891931 | Leboeuf et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5919197 | McDonald | Jul 1999 | A |
5921989 | Deacon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928282 | Nigam | Jul 1999 | A |
5941886 | Feingold | Aug 1999 | A |
5944725 | Cicenas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947974 | Brady et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5947975 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5947976 | Van Noy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964802 | Anello et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976150 | Copeland | Nov 1999 | A |
5984962 | Anello et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001107 | Feingold | Dec 1999 | A |
6010510 | Brown et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013101 | Israel | Jan 2000 | A |
6015842 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022358 | Wolf et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6048348 | Chambers et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059791 | Chambers | May 2000 | A |
6074397 | Chambers et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102539 | Tucker | Aug 2000 | A |
6117171 | Skottun | Sep 2000 | A |
6124980 | Cerbell | Sep 2000 | A |
6129733 | Brady et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139576 | Doyle et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143000 | Feingold | Nov 2000 | A |
6143001 | Brown et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6176878 | Gwon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179843 | Weiler | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180687 | Hammer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188526 | Sasaya et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190410 | Lamielle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195807 | Chou | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197059 | Cumming | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217612 | Woods | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225367 | Chaouk et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229641 | Kosaka | May 2001 | B1 |
6241737 | Feingold | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248111 | Glick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251114 | Farmer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6280449 | Blake | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283975 | Glick et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283976 | Portney | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299641 | Woods | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302911 | Hanna | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312433 | Butts et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322589 | Cumming | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334862 | Vidal et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336932 | Figueroa et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342073 | Cumming et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348437 | Avery et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371960 | Heyman et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6387101 | Butts et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387126 | Cumming | May 2002 | B1 |
6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398789 | Capetan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406481 | Feingold et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6406494 | Laguette et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413262 | Saishin et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6423094 | Sarfarazi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443985 | Woods | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447520 | Ott et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450642 | Jethmalani et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464725 | Skottun | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468282 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471708 | Green | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488708 | Sarfarazi | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6491697 | Clark et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493151 | Schachar | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497708 | Cumming | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503275 | Cumming | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6503276 | Lang et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506195 | Chambers et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517577 | Callahan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537283 | Van Noy | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6551354 | Ghazizadeh et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552860 | Alden | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554859 | Lang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585768 | Hamano et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589550 | Hodd et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592621 | Domino | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599317 | Weinschenk, III et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601956 | Jean et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605093 | Blake | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610350 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616691 | Tran | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616692 | Glick et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638304 | Azar | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638305 | Laguette | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638306 | Cumming | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645245 | Preussner | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6645246 | Weinschenk, III et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656223 | Brady | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660035 | Lang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6692525 | Brady et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695881 | Peng et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6709108 | Levine et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712848 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6723104 | Ott | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730123 | Klopotek | May 2004 | B1 |
6733507 | McNicholas et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743388 | Sridharan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749632 | Sandstedt et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749634 | Hanna | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786934 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818158 | Pham et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827738 | Willis et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836374 | Esch et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6860601 | Shadduck | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878320 | Alderson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6884261 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899732 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899850 | Haywood et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914247 | Duggan et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921405 | Feingold et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923815 | Brady et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926736 | Peng et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935743 | Shadduck | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6966649 | Shadduck | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969403 | Peng et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7014641 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7060094 | Shahinpoor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068439 | Esch et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070276 | Koretz | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7074227 | Portney | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7122053 | Esch | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144423 | McDonald | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156854 | Brown et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7217288 | Esch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7241312 | Lai et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247689 | Makker et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264351 | Shadduck | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276619 | Kunzler et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7278739 | Shadduck | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7311194 | Jin et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335209 | Meyer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7416300 | Wei et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7429263 | Vaquero et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7453646 | Lo | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7494505 | Kappelhof et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7675686 | Lo et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7753953 | Yee | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7759408 | Schorzman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763069 | Brady et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7971997 | Hiramatsu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988290 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7988292 | Neal et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8241355 | Brady et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8382769 | Inoue | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403941 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8475526 | Pynson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8613766 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8758361 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20010001836 | Cumming | May 2001 | A1 |
20010016771 | Cumming | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039449 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020046783 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055777 | Cumming et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072795 | Green | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020095212 | Boehm | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107568 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111678 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116057 | Ting et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116058 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116059 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116060 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116061 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133167 | Harish et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133228 | Sarver | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161434 | Laguette et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161435 | Portney | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177896 | Israel | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020193876 | Lang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003295 | Dreher et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004569 | Haefliger | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018384 | Valyunin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030042176 | Alderson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050695 | Lin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050696 | Cumming | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060878 | Shadduck | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060881 | Glick et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078656 | Nguyen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078657 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078658 | Zadno-Azizi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083744 | Khoury | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109925 | Ghazizadeh et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109926 | Portney | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130732 | Sarfarazi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135272 | Brady et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149480 | Shadduck | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158599 | Brady et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171808 | Phillips | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183960 | Buazza et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187505 | Liao | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199977 | Cumming | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030236376 | Kindt-Larsen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001180 | Epstein | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006386 | Valint et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006387 | Kelman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008419 | Schachar | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015236 | Sarfarazi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039446 | McNicholas | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054408 | Glick et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059343 | Shearer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082993 | Woods | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082994 | Woods et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085511 | Uno et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085515 | Roffman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088050 | Norrby et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111151 | Paul et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111152 | Kelman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111153 | Woods et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127984 | Paul et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162612 | Portney et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181279 | Nun | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186868 | Kim | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190153 | Esch | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193263 | Bryan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230203 | Yaguchi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267359 | Makker et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021139 | Shadduck | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033308 | Callahan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038446 | Vanderbilt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049606 | Vaquero et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080484 | Marmo et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050119740 | Esch et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125000 | Tourrette et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125055 | Deacon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125056 | Deacon et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131535 | Woods | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143750 | Vaquero | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143751 | Makker et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147735 | Lowery et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149057 | Rathert | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149183 | Shadduck | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165410 | Zadno-Azizi et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050222577 | Vaquero | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222578 | Vaquero | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222579 | Vaquero et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251253 | Gross | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251254 | Brady et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259221 | Marmo | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264756 | Esch | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283162 | Stratas | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283164 | Wu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020267 | Marmo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020268 | Brady et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041307 | Esch et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069433 | Nun | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085013 | Dek et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097413 | Ghazizadeh et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100703 | Evans et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116763 | Simpson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129129 | Smith | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134173 | Liu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135642 | Makker et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142780 | Pynson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142781 | Pynson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158611 | Piers et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183041 | Erk et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184181 | Cole et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200167 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253196 | Woods | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070004886 | Schorzman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005136 | Richardson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010880 | Esch | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021831 | Clarke | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027538 | Aharoni et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050023 | Bessiere et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078515 | Brady | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088433 | Esch et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100445 | Shadduck | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106377 | Smith et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129801 | Cumming | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162112 | Burriesci et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203578 | Scholl et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213817 | Esch et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244561 | Ben Nun | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265636 | Huynh | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299487 | Shadduck | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004699 | Ben Nun | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015689 | Esch et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027537 | Gerlach et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033449 | Cole et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080035243 | Breitenkamp et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046074 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046075 | Esch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058830 | Cole et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065096 | Kappelhof et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071286 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097460 | Boukhny et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080119865 | Meunier et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139769 | Iwamoto et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080179770 | Rooney et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188930 | Mentak et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200921 | Downer | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080243247 | Poley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269887 | Cumming | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269987 | Barron et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300680 | Joshua | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306587 | Your | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018512 | Charles | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018548 | Charles | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024136 | Martin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076602 | Ho et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090112313 | Mentak | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118739 | Kappelhof et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090124773 | Zhou et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090171366 | Tanaka | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204123 | Downer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228101 | Zadno-Azizi | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234366 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234449 | De Juan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248154 | Dell | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264998 | Mentak et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281620 | Sacharoff et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292293 | Bogaert et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312836 | Pinchuk et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318933 | Anderson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100039709 | Lo | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063588 | Park | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100161049 | Inoue | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110118834 | Lo et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153015 | Simonov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120078364 | Stenger | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120179249 | Coleman | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120245591 | Matthews | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130060331 | Shadduck | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130103146 | Smiley et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130131794 | Smiley et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101277659 | Oct 2008 | CN |
0898972 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1356791 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1332731 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1659991 | May 2009 | EP |
2060243 | May 2009 | EP |
2784575 | Apr 2000 | FR |
07-044938 | May 1995 | JP |
8224295 | Sep 1996 | JP |
9294754 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10-206609 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-47168 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11056998 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11276509 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001-502592 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2003144387 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-524503 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003530978 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2006341094 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2007513715 | May 2007 | JP |
2007518447 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2008-534111 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008531069 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008307394 | Dec 2008 | JP |
200934451 | Feb 2009 | JP |
1810052 | Apr 1993 | SU |
WO 9706751 | Feb 1997 | WO |
WO 0041650 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0064655 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0160286 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0189435 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0197742 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02051338 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 2004010895 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004046768 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004072689 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005018504 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005084588 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006004707 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006011937 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006047383 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2006088440 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007005529 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007005692 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007030095 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007061688 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007128423 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007138564 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009100322 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009154455 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shadduck, John H.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/347,816 entitled “Intraocular lenses and business methods,” filed Dec. 31, 2008. |
Gruber et al.; Exhaustive soxhlet extraction for the complete removal of residual compounds . . . ; Journal of Biomedical Materials Research; vol. 53; No. 5; pp. 445-448; Mar. 2000. |
Esch, Victor; U.S. Appl. No. 12/782,639 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lens,” filed May 18, 2010. |
Shadduck, John H.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/782,644 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lens,” filed May 18, 2010. |
Shadduck, John H.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,733 entitled “Intraocular Lens System and Method for Power Adjustment,” filed Aug. 9, 2010. |
Esch et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/853,892 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lens Having Peripherally Actuated Deflectable Surface and Method,” filed Aug. 10, 2010. |
Qiao et al.; Bio-inspired accommodating fluidic intraocular lens; Optics Letters; vol. 34; No. 20; pp. 3214-3216; Oct. 15, 2009. |
Conlisk, A. T. et al; Mass Transfer and Flow in Electrically Charged Micro-and Nano-channels; Analytical Chemistry, vol. 74; iss. 9; pp. 2139-2150; 2002. |
Gorder, P. F.; Electricity can pump medicine in implanted medical devices; Ohio State Research News; 3 pgs.; May 2, 2002 (printed from internet Aug. 19, 2010). |
Baughman et al., “Negative poisson's ratios for extreme states fo matter,” Science, vol. 288, pp. 1028-2022, Jun. 16, 2000. |
Baughman, “Avoiding the shrink,” Nature, vol. 425, pp. 667, Oct. 16, 2003. |
Gordon, “Applications of shape memory polyurethanes,” Proceedings of the First Intl Conf. on Shape Memory and Superelastic Tech., Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, pp. 115-119, 1994. |
Jeon et al., “Shape memory and nonstructure in poly(norbomyl-POSS) copolymers,” Polymer International, vol. 49, pp. 453-457, 2000. |
Kim et al., “Polyurethanes having shape memory effects,” Polymer, vol. 37, No. 26, pp. 5781-5793, 1996. |
Lakes et al., “Dramatically stiffer elastic composite materials due to negative stiffness phase?,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 50, pp. 979-1009, 2002. |
Lakes et al., “Extreme damping in composite materials with negative-stiffness inclusions,” Nature, vol. 410, pp. 565-567, Mar. 29, 2001. |
Lakes, “A broader view of membranes,” Nature, vol. 414, pp. 503-504, Nov. 29, 2001. |
Lakes, “Extreme damping in compliant composites with a negative-stiffness phase,” Philosophical Magazine Letters, vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 95-100, 2001. |
Lakes, “Extreme damping in composite materials with a negative stiffness phase,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, No. 13, pp. 2897-2899, Mar. 26, 2001. |
Lakes, “Lateral deformations in extreme matter,” Science, vol. 288, pp. 1976, Jun. 2000. |
Lakes, “Negative poisson's ratio materials,” Science, vol. 238, pp. 551, Oct. 23, 1987. |
Lakes, “No contractile obligations,” Nature, vol. 358, pp. 713-714, 1992. |
Li et al., “Crystallinity and morphology of segmented polyurethanes with different soft-segment length,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 62, pp. 631-638, 1996. |
Liu et al., “Thermomechanical characterization of a tailored series of shape memory polymers,” Journal of Applied Medical Polymers, vol. 6, No. 2, 2002. |
Mather et al., “Strain recovery in POSS hybrid thermoplastics,” Polymer Preprints, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 528-529, 2000. |
Metcalfe et al., “Cold hibernated elastic memory foams for endovascular interventions,” Biomaterials, vol. 24, pp. 491-497, 2003. |
Lakes et al., “Microbuckling instability in elastomeric cellular sollids,” J. Materials Science, vol. 28, pp. 4667-4672, 1993. |
Takahashi et al., “Structure and properties of shape-memory polyurethane block copolymers,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 60, pp. 1061-1069, 1996. |
Tobushi et al., “Thermomechanical properties of shape memory polymers of polyurethane series and their applications,” Journal de Physique IV, Colloque C1, vol. 6, pp. 377-384, 1996. |
Wang et al., “Deformation of extreme viscoelastic metals and composites,” Materials Science and Enginerring A, vol. 370, pp. 41-49, 2004. |
Wang et al., “Extreme stiffness systems due to negative stiffness elements,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 40-50, Jan. 2004. |
Wang et al., “Stable extremely-high-damping discrete viscoelastic systems due to native stiffness elements,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, No. 22, pp. 4451-4453, May 31, 2004. |
Wyant et al; “Basic Wavefront Aberration Theory for Optical Metrology,” Applied Optics and Optical Engineering, vol. XI, 1992:1-13. |
Xu et al., “Basic negative poisson's ratio microstructures by soft lithography,” Advanced Materials, vol. 11, No. 14, 1999, pp. 1186-1189, 1999. |
Your, Jingjong; U.S. Appl. No. 12/034,942 entitled “Polymeric materials suitable for ophthalmic devices and methods of manufacture,” filed Feb. 21, 2008. |
Your, Jingjong; U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,720 entitled “Lens material and methods of curing with UV light,” filed Jul. 22, 2008. |
Smiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/177,857 entitled “Accommodating intraocular lenses and methods of use,” filed Jul. 22, 2008. |
Smiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/178,304 entitled “Post-implant accommodating lens modification,” filed Jul. 23, 2008. |
Choi et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/178,454 entitled “Systems and methods for testing intraocular lenses,” filed Jul. 23, 2008. |
Shadduck, John H.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,184 entitled “Intraocular Lenses and Business Methods,” filed Jan. 26, 2010. |
Argento et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/685,531 entitled “Intraocular Lenses and Methods of Accounting for Capsule Size Variability and Post-Implant Changes in the Eye,” filed Jan. 11, 2010. |
Lendlein et al., “Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications”, Science; vol. 296; pp. 1673-1676; May 31, 2002. |
Lendlein et al., “Shape-memory polymers,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; vol. 41; pp. 2034-2057; 2002. |
Hildebrand et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,314 entitled “Lens Capsule Size Estimation,” filed Aug. 31, 2010. |
Dubbelman et al.; The Thickness of the Aging Human Lens Obtained from Corrected Scheimpflug Images; Optometry & Vison Science; vo. 78; iss. 6; pp. 411-416; Jun. 2001. |
Tehrani et al.; Capsule measuring ring to predict capsular bag diameter and follow its course after foldable intraocular lens implantation; J Cataract Refract Surg.; vol. 29; No. 11; pp. 2127-2134; Nov. 2003. |
Vass et al.; Prediction of pseudophakic capsular bag diameter based on biometric variables; J Cataract Refract Surg.; vol. 25; pp. 1376-1381; 1999. |
Langenbucher et al., “Computerized calculation scheme for toric intraocular lenses,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 270-276, Jun. 2004. |
Shadduck, John H.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/300,245 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses and Methods of Use,” filed Nov. 18, 2011. |
Anvar et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/033,474 entitled “Fluid for Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Feb. 23, 2011. |
Matthews et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,876 entitled “Intraocular Lens Delivery Systems and Methods of Use,” filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
Hildebrand et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/899,376 entitled “Lens Capsule Size Estimation,” filed May 21, 2013. |
Esch et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/909,946 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Jun. 4, 2013. |
Scholl et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,487 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Jul. 28, 2011. |
Smiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,983 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Jul. 29, 2011. |
Smiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,004 entitled “Accommodating Intraocular Lenses,” filed Jul. 29, 2011. |
Hildebrand et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/180,427 entitled “Intraocular lens delivery devices and methods of use,” filed Jul. 11, 2011. |
Hildebrand et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/163,794 entitled “Intraocular Lens Delivery Devices and Methods of Use,” filed Jan. 24, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090030425 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60951439 | Jul 2007 | US |