Lens system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8810803
  • Patent Number
    8,810,803
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 16, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 19, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A fragmented lens system for creating an invisible light pattern useful to computer vision systems is disclosed. Random or semi-random dot patterns generated by the present system allow a computer to uniquely identify each patch of a pattern projected by a corresponding illuminator or light source. The computer may determine the position and distance of an object by identifying the illumination pattern on the object.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention generally relates to interactive display systems. More specifically, the present invention relates to a lens system as might be used by an illuminator in an interactive display system.


2. Description of the Related Art


If a computer vision system uses a two-dimensional camera input and background subtraction, a random or semi-random dot pattern allows the system to more reliably detect objects that are at a different distance from a background. If the pattern is too regular, however, the object may disappear relative to the background when at a particular distance. This is a result of too many parts of a texture looking alike. Determinations as to the position of objects (or a more accurate indication thereof) therefore suffer. As a result, users may attempt to interact with an object (e.g., grab an object) that is not where the interactive display system otherwise indicates the object to presently be located. There is, therefore, a need for a system that may create lighting patterns useful to computer vision systems and to allow for more accurate tracking and determination of object positions in space.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first claimed embodiment, a system for projecting a pattern of light is disclosed. The system includes a light source (an illuminator) including multiple emitters of light. The emitters are arranged in a pattern. The system further includes a cluster of lenses located in front of the light source. The cluster of lenses focuses and projects light from the emitters in numerous directions. The focused and projected light forms a pattern of light. A camera detects the pattern of light on an object illuminated by the emitters. A computing device executes instructions stored in memory to determine a location of the object in space utilizing at least the detected pattern of light on the object


In a variation of the aforementioned embodiment, the system may include a cluster of infrared light emitting diodes (LEDs). The light emitting diodes generate infrared light that is detectable by the camera but not by the eye of a human observer interacting with the object. The system may alternatively (or additionally) include a condenser lens located between the light source and the cluster of lenses. The condenser lens concentrates light from the light source to the cluster of lens.


A second claimed embodiment of the present invention is for a method for projecting a pattern of infrared light. Through this claimed method, light is emitted from a light source (an illuminator) including multiple emitters arranged in a pattern. A cluster of lenses focuses and projects the emitted light, the cluster of lenses located in front of the light source. The focused and projected light forms a pattern of light. That pattern is detected on an object illuminated by the emitters. As a result, the location of an object in space may be determined utilizing at least the detected pattern of light on the object. The location of the object may be determined by a computing device executing instructions stored in memory (e.g., a program).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary lens system including a lighting source, an optional condenser lens, and lens cluster.



FIG. 2 illustrates a number of semi-random light configurations for the lighting source of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 illustrates the assembly of a lens cluster like that of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional illustration of light as created by an LED in an illuminator light source.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating light emitted in a cone from an LED in an infrared LED cluster.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The presently disclosed lens system may create an invisible light pattern that is useful to computer vision systems. If a computer vision system utilizes a pattern matching algorithm to identify position and distance of objects from a camera, the random or semi-random dot pattern generated by the present system allows the computer to uniquely identify each patch of the pattern projected by the illuminator. As a result, the computer may determine the position and distance of an object by identifying the illumination pattern on the object. The computer may make this determination by executing instructions corresponding to a computer program stored in memory. Results of these determinations may then be rendered on a display device, which may include user manipulation of an object on the display.


In a system where a computer vision system utilizes a stereo camera and a stereopsis algorithm to match features between two or more camera images, the vision system will attempt to find matches between texture patches in the different images. The disparity between these patches gives an indication of depth. The compared texture patches often lie along the same horizontal line in the two images. The presently disclosed lens system allows for patterned illumination that better ensures that all objects have texture thereby ensuring good performance by the stereo algorithm. This is especially true with respect to the axis along which the vision algorithm matches texture patches, is very important. The detected pattern may be aperiodic along one or more dimensions in this regard.


In this context, an embodiment of the presently disclosed invention provides for a lens system that may be used in conjunction with an illuminator to create an invisible random, semi-random, partially random, or repeating pattern useful to a computer vision system like those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,259,747 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/100,737 (subsequently referred to as the '747 patent and '737 application, respectively). The system includes a lighting source composed of a pattern of light emitters, an optional condenser lens or similar hardware to focus emitted light onto a common area (namely a lens cluster), and a lens cluster containing multiple lenses. Each lens of the lens cluster may be of a similar focal length and/or designed to displace an image of the emitter pattern by a particular distance.



FIG. 1 illustrates the aforementioned exemplary lens system 100 including a lighting source 110 (such as an illuminator), an optional condenser lens 120, and lens cluster 130. Light emitted from lighting source 110 is re-aimed by condenser lens 120 so that the light is directed towards the center of lens cluster 130. Lens cluster 130 then focuses and projects light from the emitters in numerous directions. The focused and projected light forms a pattern of light, which may be detected by a camera so that a computing device may determine a location of an object in space utilizing at least the detected pattern of light on the object. This determination may involve the execution of instructions corresponding to a program stored in memory.


Lighting source 110 may be akin to the lamp of the '747 patent. A lamp (like lamp 2 of FIG. 1 of the '747 patent) may illuminate a person(s) or other object(s). The lighting source 110 of the present application may also may be comparable to the light source of component 10 in FIG. 2 of the '747 patent. Lighting source 110 may also be configured in a manner similar to those illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4 of the '747 patent.


Light source 110 includes any number of emitters as are further discussed in the context of FIG. 2. Each emitter may be mounted such that it emits light in a cone perpendicular to the surface of lighting source 110. If each emitter emits light in a cone, the center of the cone may be aimed at the center of lens cluster 130. Aiming may involve an optional intermediate lens (like condenser lens 120). The angle of the cone of light produced by the emitters may be chosen such that the cone will completely cover the surface of lens cluster 130. In an embodiment omitting a condenser lens, the lighting source 110 may focus light onto lens cluster 130 on its own. For example, each emitter at the lighting source 110 may be individually be angled with respect to the lens cluster 130.


Optional condenser lens 120 redirects light from each of the emitters in light source 110. Condenser lens 120 may be substituted with hardware or some other component similarly capable of concentrating and/or redirecting light. Condenser lens 120 reduces wasted light by redirecting the emitters' light toward the center of the lens cluster 130 thereby seeking to ensure that as much emitted light as possible passes through lens cluster 130. Implementations of condenser lens 130 may include a convex lens, a plano-convex lens, a Fresnel lens, a set of micro-lenses, one or more prisms, or a prismatic film.


The focal length of the lenses in lens cluster 130 may be similar to the distance between lens cluster 130 and lighting source 110. A focal length of this nature helps ensure that light emitters at lighting source 110 are in focus or substantially in focus when an illuminator including lighting source 110 is pointed at a distant object. The position of the lighting source 110, optional condenser lens 120, and lens cluster 130 in system 100 may be adjusted to allow for an emitted light pattern to be focused at a variety of distances.


Lens cluster 130 takes the light from each emitter and focuses that light onto a number of points. Each lens in the lens cluster 130 may be used to focus the light of each emitter from illuminator light source 110 onto a different point. The theoretical number of points that may be created by shining the lighting source 110 through the lens cluster 130 is equal to the number of emitters in the lighting source multiplied by the number of lenses in the lens cluster 130. For example, a lighting source 110 with 200 LEDs and a lens cluster 130 with 36 lenses can create up to 7200 distinct points of light. An illuminator, lamp, or projector utilizing the present lens system 100 may create a high resolution texture that is useful to a computer vision system.


All the lenses in the lens cluster 130 may have a similar focal length. This similarity in length may better ensure that the pattern is focused together onto an object illuminated by the light source 110 (e.g., a pattern illuminator). Lenses may have somewhat different focal lengths so at least some of the pattern is in focus at different distances. In some instances, a semi-random or random pattern may be desirable to the functioning of the computer vision system. In such an instance, the lenses within the lens cluster 130 may displace the focused image by different distances to the side.



FIG. 2 illustrates a number of semi-random light configurations (210-230) for lighting source 110 of FIG. 1. The light configuration patterns may likewise be used to create a desired random or semi-random pattern as referenced above. In the patterns 220-230 illustrated in FIG. 2, each black ‘dot’ is representative of an emission of light (i.e., a light emitter). It should be noted that the black ‘dots’ are merely exemplary for the purpose of FIG. 2. The black ‘dots’ need not necessarily emit ‘black light’ or focused ‘dots’ of light although various types of light, frequencies, and patterns within the pattern (e.g., dots versus squares versus asymmetric blobs) may be emitted from light source 110 and any constituent light emitters.


In that regard, potential light sources for emission of light are inclusive of light emitting diodes, laser diodes, incandescent bulbs, metal halide lamps, sodium vapor lamps, organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs), and pixels of a liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. The emitter(s) at light source 110 may be a backlit slide or backlit pattern of holes. In an embodiment like that of FIG. 1, each emitter (i.e., each dot) ‘aims’ the light along a cone toward the lens cluster 130 or intermediate and optional condenser lens 120.


The pattern of illuminators may be randomized to varying degrees. For example, pattern 210 illustrates a rectangular grid of emitters with some removed at random. Pattern 220 illustrates a rotated grid of emitters with the columns shifted random amounts and random emitters removed. Pattern 230 consists of a randomly positioned, tight packing of emitters with a random set of emitters removed. The density of emitters on the light source varies across a variety of spatial scales. This variation in emitter density helps ensure that the emitters at light source 110 will create a pattern that varies in brightness even at distances where the emitted pattern is not entirely in focus.


The light source 110 of FIG. 1 and the pattern embodiments illustrated in FIG. 2 (210-230) are generally rectangular in shape. This rectangular configuration of the light source 110 in conjunction with a design of the lens cluster 130 helps create a pattern that roughly covers an otherwise rectangular area. The use of rectangular light sources 110 and constituent patterns facilitates clustering of illuminators thereby covering broad areas without significant overlap. Nevertheless, other shapes may be used with respect to illuminator patterns and light source 110 configurations and overlap of patterns may be desirable and incurred.


The light source 110 may also be positioned on a motorized mount. Through such a mounting, the light source 110 may move or rotate thus creating further variation and control as to emitted light patterns and focus of the same at varying distances. Emitters in the patterns (210-230) may be turned on or off via an electronic control system thereby allowing the pattern emitted from the light source 110 to vary. The emitter pattern, too, may be regular (e.g., with no variance in layout or pattern) but the pattern of emitters that are in an ‘on state’ at any given time may be random.


As initially noted above, different frequencies of light may be emitted from light source 110 with respect to emitting light in a particular pattern such as those illustrated in FIG. 2. Near-infrared, far-infrared, visible, and ultraviolet light are just some of the various light frequencies that may be emitted subject to a particular choice of light emitter. A number of different frequencies of light may be emitted from a single pattern (e.g., one ‘dot’ may emit light at a near-infrared frequency while another ‘dot’ emits light at an ultraviolet frequency). The light source 110 may be strobed in conjunction with the camera(s) of a corresponding computer vision system thereby allowing the presence and effects of ambient light to be reduced.


The pattern, frequency, strobing, and other manipulations of emitted light may be particularly useful with respect to operating a vision system like that disclosed in the '737 application. In a system like that disclosed in the '737 application, an interactive video display system allows a physical object to interact with a virtual object. A light source delivers a pattern of invisible light to a three-dimensional space occupied by the physical object and a camera detects invisible light scattered by the physical object. A computer system analyzes information generated by the camera, maps the position of the physical object in the three-dimensional space, and generates a responsive image that includes the virtual object, which is then rendered on a display. Utilizing the present lens system to project a pattern of invisible light may improve the accuracy and utility of such a vision system.



FIG. 3 illustrates the assembly of a lens cluster like lens cluster 130 in FIG. 1. In element 310, a lens is illustrated that has had several square columns removed. These removed square pieces are then reassembled into a lens cluster (like that of FIG. 1) as shown in element 320. The varying angles and displacements of these squares have ensured some randomness in the focal points of the lenses in the cluster. In FIG. 3, the rough spatial positioning of the squares (shown with the corresponding pieces numbered 1 to 13) has been preserved. While this positioning is not necessary, this arrangement does provide the advantage of helping ensure that copies of each emitter that are projected as bright dots by the lens cluster are not too far apart. Further, this arrangement helps create a roughly rectangular shape to the overall pattern.


As is also evident in FIG. 3, there are multiple sizes of squares in the diagram (e.g., square [1] versus square [8]). While not necessary, this difference in size helps the computer vision system to process a variety of illumination levels. If the square is larger, the dots produced by the pattern will be brighter. By mixing large and small squares, the pattern becomes a mix of dense dimmer dots and sparse brighter dots. The computer vision system may then see some texture from the illuminator in conditions with high ambient illumination while having high resolution texture when the ambient illumination is low.


The lens cluster need not be constructed in this method. The lens cluster may be constructed of regular lenses, Fresnel lenses, or a mix of lenses. The lenses may or may not have a square cross-sectional shape. The lenses may or may not be different sizes. Although FIG. 3 shows a lens being cut apart to construct the lens cluster, it may be fabricated by casting from a mold, machining, or another technique. The ‘pieces’ of the lens from which the lenses in the cluster are derived may or may not overlap.


If the lenses in the lens cluster focus light onto different points, the emitter may not need to be completely random. For example, if there are a small number of bright emitters in a grid pattern and a large number of lenses in the lens cluster, the light produced by the illuminator can still be semi-random. Repetition would show up over very large length scales.



FIG. 4 illustrates a cross-sectional illustration of light as created by an LED in an illuminator light source. It should be noted that the dimensions of FIG. 4 are not to scale. In a real-world scenario, the object and focal plane are typically further away from a lens cluster. As such, FIG. 4 should be considered exemplary for the purpose of aiding understanding of the present disclosure.


In FIG. 4, light is emitted in a cone from an LED in the infrared LED cluster 110, which corresponds to lighting source 110 of FIG. 1. The light path is redirected toward the center of the lens cluster by the condenser lens 120, which likewise corresponds to the optional condenser lens of FIG. 1. When the light cone hits the lens cluster 130 (which corresponds to cluster 130 of FIG. 1), different parts of the LED light are focused onto different locations on a distant plane. This causes several bright spots to be created from the light of a single LED. When all the light from all the LEDs is tracked, the result is a dense overlapping pattern of focused light beams creating a discernable pattern that may be detected by a camera(s) and processed by a corresponding computing device.


The use of infrared light (or other types of non-visible or substantially invisible light) may prove useful in that it may be invisible (or nearly invisible) to the human eye of an observer interacting with an illuminated object. In this way, the illuminated object is not obscured by an illumination pattern nor or does the overall appearance of the object appear to have been altered. Notwithstanding, a computing device coupled to a camera may detect the pattern in order to track the object and interactions with the same with an increased degree of accuracy.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating light emitted in a cone from an LED in the infrared LED cluster 110, which corresponds to lighting source 110 of FIG. 1. The light path is redirected toward the center of the lens cluster by the condenser lens 120, which likewise corresponds to the optional condenser lens of FIG. 1. When the light cone hits the lens cluster 130 (which corresponds to cluster 130 of FIG. 1), different parts of the LED light are focused onto different locations on a distant plane. This causes several bright spots to be created from the light of a single LED. When all the light from all the LEDs is tracked, the result is a dense overlapping pattern of focused light beams creating a discernable pattern that may be detected by a camera(s) 510 and processed by a corresponding computing device 515.


While the present invention has been described in connection with a series of exemplary embodiments, these descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth herein. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A system for projecting a pattern of light, the system comprising: a light source including a plurality of emitters configured to emit light, the plurality of emitters arranged in a pattern;a cluster of lenses located in front of the light source, wherein each lens of the cluster of lenses is configured to receive light from the plurality of emitters and the cluster of lenses is configured to concurrently focus and project light from each of the emitters in a plurality of directions; anda condenser lens located between the light source and the cluster of lenses, wherein the condenser lens is configured to concentrate light from each of the plurality of emitters towards a center of the cluster of lenses.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of emitters includes light emitting diodes configured to generate infrared light that is detectable by a camera but not by an eye of a human observer interacting with an object illuminated by at least a portion of the light.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the cluster of lenses includes a Fresnel lens.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the emitters are arranged in an irregular pattern.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein a first pattern of light projected by one of the lenses from the cluster of lenses overlaps with a second pattern of light projected by another of the lenses from the cluster of lenses.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein a pattern of light projected by the cluster of lenses is aperiodic along at least one dimension.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, further comprising: a camera configured to detect a pattern of light on an object illuminated by at least a portion of the pattern of light; anda computing device configured to determine a location of the object in space based on at least the detected pattern of light on the object.
  • 8. A method comprising: emitting, from a plurality of emitters, a plurality of lights arranged in a pattern;concentrating, via a condenser lens, the plurality of lights towards a central location of a cluster of lenses;receiving the concentrated light at a plurality of points within the cluster of lenses; andconcurrently focusing, from each lens of the cluster of lenses, the received and concentrated light from each of the plurality of emitters in a plurality of directions.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein said emitting includes generating infrared light that is not detectable by an eye of a human observer interacting with an object illuminated by at least a portion of the light.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, wherein said concentrating comprises concentrating the plurality of lights towards a center of a cluster of lenses including a Fresnel lens.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the focused light comprises an irregular pattern.
  • 12. The method of claim 8, wherein the focused light includes a first pattern of light overlapping with a second pattern of light.
  • 13. The method of claim 8, wherein the focused light includes a pattern which is aperiodic along at least one dimension.
  • 14. The method of claim 8, further comprising: detecting a pattern of light on an object illuminated by at least a portion of a pattern of light; anddetermining a location of the object in space based on at least the detected pattern of light on the object.
  • 15. A system for projecting a pattern of light, the system comprising: a light source including a plurality of emitters configured to emit light;a cluster of lenses, each lens included in the cluster of lenses being configured to receive the emitted light from each of the plurality of emitters; anda condenser lens located between said light source and said cluster of lenses, the condenser lens concentrating light from each of the plurality of emitters towards a center of the cluster of lenses.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the plurality of emitters includes light emitting diodes configured to generate infrared light that is not detectable by an eye of a human observer.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, further comprising a computing device configured to analyze images of a pattern formed by light projected from each of the emitters on an object to determine a location of the object in space based on at least the pattern of light on the object.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/269,849, filed Nov. 12, 2008, entitled “LENS SYSTEM,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/987,315, filed Nov. 12, 2007 and entitled “FRAGMENTED LENS SYSTEM,” each of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (282)
Number Name Date Kind
2917980 Grube et al. Dec 1959 A
3068754 Benjamin et al. Dec 1962 A
3763468 Ovshinsky et al. Oct 1973 A
4053208 Kato et al. Oct 1977 A
4275395 Dewey et al. Jun 1981 A
4573191 Kidode et al. Feb 1986 A
4725863 Dumbreck et al. Feb 1988 A
4769697 Gilley et al. Sep 1988 A
4791572 Green et al. Dec 1988 A
4843568 Krueger et al. Jun 1989 A
4887898 Halliburton et al. Dec 1989 A
4948371 Hall Aug 1990 A
5001558 Burley et al. Mar 1991 A
5138304 Bronson Aug 1992 A
5151718 Nelson Sep 1992 A
5239373 Tang et al. Aug 1993 A
5276609 Durlach Jan 1994 A
5319496 Jewell et al. Jun 1994 A
5325472 Horiuchi et al. Jun 1994 A
5325473 Monroe et al. Jun 1994 A
5418583 Masumoto May 1995 A
5426474 Rubtsov et al. Jun 1995 A
5436639 Arai et al. Jul 1995 A
5442252 Golz Aug 1995 A
5454043 Freeman Sep 1995 A
5473396 Okajima et al. Dec 1995 A
5497269 Gal Mar 1996 A
5510828 Lutterbach et al. Apr 1996 A
5526182 Jewell et al. Jun 1996 A
5528263 Platzker et al. Jun 1996 A
5528297 Seegert et al. Jun 1996 A
5534917 MacDougall Jul 1996 A
5548694 Gibson Aug 1996 A
5591972 Noble et al. Jan 1997 A
5594469 Freeman et al. Jan 1997 A
5633691 Vogeley et al. May 1997 A
5662401 Shimizu et al. Sep 1997 A
5703637 Miyazaki et al. Dec 1997 A
5771307 Lu et al. Jun 1998 A
5808784 Ando et al. Sep 1998 A
5846086 Bizzi et al. Dec 1998 A
5861881 Freeman et al. Jan 1999 A
5882204 Iannazo et al. Mar 1999 A
5900982 Dolgoff et al. May 1999 A
5923380 Yang et al. Jul 1999 A
5923475 Kurtz et al. Jul 1999 A
5953152 Hewlett Sep 1999 A
5966696 Giraud Oct 1999 A
5969754 Zeman Oct 1999 A
5978136 Ogawa et al. Nov 1999 A
5982352 Pryor Nov 1999 A
5997150 Anderson Dec 1999 A
6008800 Pryor Dec 1999 A
6058397 Barrus et al. May 2000 A
6075895 Qiao et al. Jun 2000 A
6084979 Kanade et al. Jul 2000 A
6088612 Blair Jul 2000 A
6097369 Wambach Aug 2000 A
6106119 Edwards Aug 2000 A
6118888 Chino et al. Sep 2000 A
6125198 Onda Sep 2000 A
6166744 Jaszlics et al. Dec 2000 A
6176782 Lyons et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191773 Maruno et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198487 Fortenbery et al. Mar 2001 B1
6198844 Nomura Mar 2001 B1
6217449 Kaku Apr 2001 B1
6254246 Tiao et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263339 Hirsch Jul 2001 B1
6270403 Watanabe et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278418 Doi Aug 2001 B1
6292171 Fu et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304267 Sata Oct 2001 B1
6308565 French et al. Oct 2001 B1
6323895 Sata Nov 2001 B1
6333735 Anvekar Dec 2001 B1
6335977 Kage Jan 2002 B1
6339748 Hiramatsu Jan 2002 B1
6349301 Mitchell et al. Feb 2002 B1
6351222 Swan et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353428 Maggioni et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359612 Peter et al. Mar 2002 B1
6388657 Natoli May 2002 B1
6394896 Sugimoto May 2002 B2
6400374 Lanier Jun 2002 B2
6407870 Hurevich et al. Jun 2002 B1
6412953 Tiao et al. Jul 2002 B1
6414672 Rekimoto et al. Jul 2002 B2
6445815 Sato Sep 2002 B1
6454419 Kitazawa Sep 2002 B2
6464375 Wada et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480267 Yanagi et al. Nov 2002 B2
6491396 Karasawa et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501515 Iwamura Dec 2002 B1
6513953 Itoh Feb 2003 B1
6522312 Ohshima et al. Feb 2003 B2
6545706 Edwards et al. Apr 2003 B1
6552760 Gotoh et al. Apr 2003 B1
6598978 Hasegawa Jul 2003 B2
6607275 Cimini et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611241 Firester et al. Aug 2003 B1
6654734 Mani et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658150 Tsuji et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661918 Gordon et al. Dec 2003 B1
6677969 Hongo Jan 2004 B1
6707054 Ray Mar 2004 B2
6707444 Hendriks et al. Mar 2004 B1
6712476 Ito et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720949 Pryor et al. Apr 2004 B1
6732929 Good et al. May 2004 B2
6747666 Utterback Jun 2004 B2
6752720 Clapper et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754370 Hall-Holt et al. Jun 2004 B1
6791700 Omura et al. Sep 2004 B2
6808293 Watanabe et al. Oct 2004 B2
6826727 Mohr et al. Nov 2004 B1
6831664 Marmaropoulos et al. Dec 2004 B2
6871982 Holman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873710 Cohen-Solal et al. Mar 2005 B1
6877882 Haven et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882480 Yanagisawa Apr 2005 B2
6902310 Im Jun 2005 B2
6912313 Li Jun 2005 B2
6939027 Harumoto Sep 2005 B2
6965693 Kondo et al. Nov 2005 B1
6975360 Slatter Dec 2005 B2
6999600 Venetianer Feb 2006 B2
7015894 Morohoshi Mar 2006 B2
7042440 Pryor et al. May 2006 B2
7054068 Yoshida et al. May 2006 B2
7058204 Hildreth et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068274 Welch et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069516 Rekimoto Jun 2006 B2
7084859 Pryor et al. Aug 2006 B1
7088508 Ebina et al. Aug 2006 B2
7129927 Mattsson Oct 2006 B2
7142285 Antoni et al. Nov 2006 B2
7149262 Nayar et al. Dec 2006 B1
7158676 Rainsford Jan 2007 B1
7170492 Bell Jan 2007 B2
7190832 Frost et al. Mar 2007 B2
7193608 Stuerzlinger Mar 2007 B2
7227526 Hildreth et al. Jun 2007 B2
7259747 Bell Aug 2007 B2
7262874 Suzuki Aug 2007 B2
7268950 Poulsen Sep 2007 B2
7289130 Satoh et al. Oct 2007 B1
7330584 Weiguo et al. Feb 2008 B2
7331681 Pohlert et al. Feb 2008 B2
7339521 Scheidemann et al. Mar 2008 B2
7348963 Bell Mar 2008 B2
7379563 Shamaie May 2008 B2
7382897 Brown et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394459 Bathiche et al. Jul 2008 B2
7428542 Fink et al. Sep 2008 B1
7431253 Yeh Oct 2008 B2
7432917 Wilson et al. Oct 2008 B2
7468742 Ahn et al. Dec 2008 B2
7536032 Bell May 2009 B2
7559841 Hashimoto Jul 2009 B2
7576727 Bell Aug 2009 B2
7598942 Underkoffler et al. Oct 2009 B2
7619824 Poulsen Nov 2009 B2
7665041 Wilson et al. Feb 2010 B2
7671321 Perlman et al. Mar 2010 B2
7710391 Bell et al. May 2010 B2
7728280 Feilkas et al. Jun 2010 B2
7737636 Li et al. Jun 2010 B2
7738725 Raskar et al. Jun 2010 B2
7745771 Troxell et al. Jun 2010 B2
RE41685 Feldman et al. Sep 2010 E
7809167 Bell Oct 2010 B2
7834846 Bell Nov 2010 B1
7961906 Ruedin Jun 2011 B2
7971156 Albertson et al. Jun 2011 B2
8018579 Krah Sep 2011 B1
8035612 Bell et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035624 Bell et al. Oct 2011 B2
8081822 Bell Dec 2011 B1
8085293 Brodsky et al. Dec 2011 B2
8085994 Kim Dec 2011 B2
8098277 Bell Jan 2012 B1
8159682 Bell Apr 2012 B2
8199108 Bell et al. Jun 2012 B2
8230367 Bell et al. Jul 2012 B2
8259163 Bell et al. Sep 2012 B2
20010012001 Rekimoto et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010033675 Maurer et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020006583 Michiels et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032697 French et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032906 Grossman Mar 2002 A1
20020041327 Hildreth et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046100 Kinjo Apr 2002 A1
20020064382 Hildreth et al. May 2002 A1
20020073417 Kondo et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020078441 Drake et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020081032 Chen et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020103617 Uchiyama et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020105623 Pinhanez Aug 2002 A1
20020130839 Wallace et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140633 Rafii et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020140682 Brown et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020178440 Agnihotri et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030032484 Ohshima et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065563 Elliott et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078840 Strunk et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030091724 Mizoguchi May 2003 A1
20030093784 Dimitrova et al. May 2003 A1
20030098819 Sukthankar et al. May 2003 A1
20030103030 Wu Jun 2003 A1
20030113018 Nefian et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030122839 Matraszek et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030126013 Shand Jul 2003 A1
20030128543 Rekow Jul 2003 A1
20030137494 Tulbert Jul 2003 A1
20030161502 Morihara et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030178549 Ray Sep 2003 A1
20040005924 Watabe et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015783 Lennon et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040046744 Rafii et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073541 Lindblad et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040091110 Barkans May 2004 A1
20040156130 Powell et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040165006 Kirby et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050028188 Latona et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050039206 Opdycke Feb 2005 A1
20050086695 Keele et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050088407 Bell Apr 2005 A1
20050104506 Youh et al. May 2005 A1
20050122308 Bell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132266 Ambrosino et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147135 Kurtz et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050147282 Fujii Jul 2005 A1
20050185828 Semba et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050195598 Dancs et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050265587 Schneider Dec 2005 A1
20060001760 Matsumura et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060010400 Dehlin et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060031786 Hillis et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060078015 Franck Apr 2006 A1
20060132725 Terada et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060168515 Dorsett, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060184993 Goldthwaite et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060187545 Doi Aug 2006 A1
20060227099 Han et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060242145 Krishnamurthy et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060256382 Matraszek et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060258397 Kaplan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060294247 Hinckley et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060294258 Powers-Boyle et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070002039 Pendleton et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019066 Cutler Jan 2007 A1
20070199035 Schwartz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070209009 Huang Sep 2007 A1
20070285419 Givon Dec 2007 A1
20080013826 Hillis et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080018595 Hildreth et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080030460 Hildreth et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080036732 Wilson et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080040692 Sunday et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080062123 Bell Mar 2008 A1
20080062257 Corson Mar 2008 A1
20080090484 Lee et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080150890 Bell et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080245952 Troxell et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080252596 Bell et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090027337 Hildreth Jan 2009 A1
20090079813 Hildreth Mar 2009 A1
20090102788 Nishida et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090106785 Pharn Apr 2009 A1
20090172606 Dunn et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090179733 Hattori et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090235295 Bell et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100026624 Bell et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100039500 Bell et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100060722 Bell et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100121866 Bell et al. May 2010 A1
20110157316 Okamoto et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120080411 Mizuyama et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120287044 Bell et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120293625 Schneider et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120317511 Bell et al. Dec 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (33)
Number Date Country
0 055 366 Jul 1982 EP
0 626 636 Nov 1994 EP
0 913 790 May 1999 EP
1 689 172 Jun 2002 EP
57-094672 Jun 1982 JP
10-207619 Aug 1998 JP
11-057216 Mar 1999 JP
2000-105583 Apr 2000 JP
2002-014997 Jan 2002 JP
2002-092023 Mar 2002 JP
2002-171507 Jun 2002 JP
2003-517642 May 2003 JP
2003-271084 Sep 2003 JP
2004-246578 Sep 2004 JP
2007-514242 May 2007 JP
2003-0058894 Jul 2003 KR
WO 9838533 Sep 1998 WO
WO 0016562 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0163916 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0201537 Jan 2002 WO
WO 02100094 Dec 2002 WO
WO 2004055776 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004097741 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005003948 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005041578 May 2005 WO
WO 2005041579 May 2005 WO
WO 2005057398 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005057399 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005057921 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005091651 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2007019443 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2008124820 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2009035705 Mar 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (161)
Entry
EffecTV Version 0.2.0 released Mar. 27, 2001, available online at http://web.archive.org/web/20010101-20010625re—http://effectv.sourceforge.net.
Index of EffecTV, as downloaded on Apr. 30, 2007 at http://effectv.cvs.sourceforge.net/effectv/EffecTV/?pathrev=rel—0—2—0.
R111, The Transformation From Digital Information to Analog Matter, available online at http://www.particles.de/paradocs/r111/10mkp2004/hmtl/r111—text111hock04.html, cited on Jan. 17, 2005 during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
2001 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics program description, ACM SIGGRAPH, held Mar. 19-21, 2001, Research Triangle Park, NC, downloaded from http://www.allconferences.com/conferences/2000830092631/, cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Affidavit of Daniel Barthels regarding EffecTV, dated May 15, 2007 (partial machine translation), cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Announcement: Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces, The Banff Rocky Mountain Resort, Banff, Alberta, Canada, Oct. 20-21, 1997, can be found at http://www.research.microsoft.com/PUIWorkshop/ cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Bodymover Body Movement as a Means to Obtain an Audiovisual Spatial Experience, 2000 ART+COM AG Berlin; http://www.artcom.de/index.php?option=com—acprojects&page=6&id=28&Itemid=144&details=0&lang=en, as downloaded on Aug. 8, 2005.
ART+COM Bodymover 2000, as downloaded on Aug. 21, 2009 from http://www.artcom.de/index.php?option=com—acprojects&page=6&id=28&Itemid=144&details=0&lang=en, cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Brown, Matthew, et al. “Multi-Image Matching using Multi-Scale Oriented Patches,” Technical Report, Dec. 2004, pp. 1-48, available online at ftp://ftp.research.microsoft.com/pub/tr/TR-2004-133.pdf.
Brown, Matthew, et al., “Multi-Image Matching using Multi-Scale Oriented Patches,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Conference Publication Date: Jun. 20-25, 2005, 8 pgs.
Buxton, Bill, “Multi-Touch Systems That I Have Known and Loved,” accessed Mar. 21, 2007, http://billbuxton.com/multitouchOverview.html.
Communication dated Dec. 10, 2008 from Patentanwalt attaching article by Katy Bachman, entitled “Reactrix Up for Sale,” cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Crouser, P.D., et al., “Unattenuated tracer particle extraction through time-averaged, background image subtraction with outlier rejection,” Experiments in Fluids, 22, 1997, 220-228, Springer-Verlag.
Dachselt, Raimund, et al., “CONTIGRA: An XML-Based Architecture for Component-Oriented 3D Applications, 3D Technologies for the World Wide Web, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on 3D Technology,” ACM, Feb. 24-28, 2002, pp. 155-163.
Davis, J.W., et al., “SIDEshow: A Silhouette-based Interactive Dual-screen Environment,” Aug. 1998, MIT Media Lab Tech Report No. 457.
Demarest, Ken, “Sand,” 2000, Mine Control, art installation, available online at http://www.mine-control.com, downloaded on Mar. 15, 2007.
DePiero et al; “3-D Computer Vision Using Structured Light: Design, Calibrations and Implementation Issues”; Advances in Computers, vol. 43, pp. 243-278, 1996.
EffecTV Software Source: effect module, dated May 20, 2001 (German); cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Elgammal, Ahmed, et al., “Non-parametric Model for Background Subtraction,” Jun. 2000, European Conference on Computer Vision, Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol. 1843, pp. 751-767.
Foerterer, Holger, “Fluidum,” 1999, art installation, description available online at http://www.foerterer.com/fluidum, downloaded on Mar. 16, 2007.
Foerterer, Holger, “Helikopter,” 2001, art installation, description available online at http://www.foerterer.com/helikopter/index.htm, downloaded on Mar. 16, 2007.
Freeman, William, et al., “Computer vision for interactive computer graphics,” May-Jun. 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 42-53.
Frisken, Sarah F. et al., “Adaptively Sampled Distance Fields: A General Representation of Shape for Computer Graphics,” Jul. 23-28, 2000, Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 249-254.
Fujihata, Masaki, “Beyond Pages,” 1995, art installation, description available online at http://on1.zkm.de/zkm/werke/BeyondPages downloaded on Mar. 16, 2007.
Goetz, Frank, et al., “An XML-based Visual Shading Language for Vertex and Fragment Shaders,” 3D Technologies for the World Wide Web, Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on 3D Technology; ACM, Apr. 5-8, 2004; pp. 87-97.
GroundFX Document, GestureTek (Very Vivid, Inc.), description available online at http://www.gesturetek.com/groundfx, downloaded on Aug. 11, 2006.
Haller, Michael et al., “Coeno-Storyboard: An Augmented Surface for Storyboard Presentations,” Mensch & Computer 2005, Sep. 4-7, 2005, Linz, Austria.
Han, Jefferson Y., “Low-Cost Multi-Touch Sensing Through Frustrated Total Internal Reflection,” Oct. 23-26, 2005, ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST).
Harville, Michael et al., “Foreground Segmentation Using Adaptive Mixture Models in Color and Depth,” Jul. 8, 2001, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Detection and Recognition of Events in Video, pp. 3-11.
Hemmer, Raphael Lozano, “Body Movies,” 2002, art project/installation, description available online at http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/eproyecto.html downloaded on Mar. 16, 2007.
Hoff, Kenneth E. III et al, “Fast and Simple 2D Geometric Proximity Queries Using Graphics Hardware,” Mar. 19-21, 2001, Proc. of the 2001 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp. 145-148.
Huang, Mark et al. “Shadow Vision,” Introduction to Computer Graphics, Fall 1999, Dec. 6, 1999; pp. 1-10, XP55013291 http:groups.csail.mit.edu/graphics/classes/6.837/F99/projects/reports/team16.pdf.
Ivars Peterson, “Artificial reality; combining a person's live video image with computer graphics suggests novel ways of working and playing with computers” Science News, Jun. 22, 1985.
Jabri, Sumer et al., “Detection and Location of People in Video Images Using Adaptive Fusion of Color and Edge Information;” presented at the Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, 2000.
Joyce, Arthur W. III, et al., “Implementation and capabilities of a virtual interaction system,” Sep. 10-11, 1998, Proceedings 2nd European Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, Skovde, Sweden, pp. 237-245.
Katz, Itai et al., “A Multi-Touch Surface Using Multiple Cameras,” Oct. 3, 2007, Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems, vol. 4678/2007.
Keays, Bill, “metaField Maze,” 1998, exhibited at Siggraph'99 Emerging Technologies and Ars Electronica Aug. 8-13, 1999, description available online at http://www.billkeays.com/metaFieldInfosheet1A.pdf.
Keays, Bill, “Using High-Bandwidth Input/Output in Interactive Art,” Jun. 1999, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and Planning.
Khan, Jeff; “Intelligent Room with a View”; Apr.-May 2004, RealTime Arts Magazine, Issue 60, available online at www.realtimearts.net/article/60/7432.
Kjeldesn, Rick et al., “Dynamically Reconfigurable Vision-Based User Interfaces,” Apr. 2003, 3rd International Conference on Vision Systems (ICVVS '03), Graz, Austria, pp. 6-12.
Kjeldsen, R. et al., “Interacting with Steerable Projected Displays,” May 20-21, 2002, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Washington, D.C.
Kreuger, Myron, “Videoplace—An Artificial Reality,” Apr. 1985, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Francisco, California, pp. 35-40.
Kreuger, Myron, “Videoplace,” 1969 and subsequent, summary available online at http://www.jtnimoy.com/itp/newmediahistory/videoplace, downloaded Mar. 21, 2007.
Kurapati, Kaushal, et al., “A Multi-Agent TV Recommender,” Jul. 13-14, 2001, Workshop on Personalization in Future TV, pp. 1-8, XP02228335.
Lamarre, Mathieu, et al., “Background subtraction using competing models in the block-DCT domain,” Pattern Recognition, 2002 Proceedings, 16 International Conference in Quebec City, Que., Canada, Aug. 11-15, 2002.
Lantagne, Michel, et al., “VIP: Vision tool for comparing Images of People,” Vision Interface, Jun. 11-13, 2003, pp. 1-8.
Leibe, Bastian, et al., “The Perspective Workbench; Toward Spontaneous and Natural Interaction in Semi-Immersive Virtual Environments,” Mar. 18-22, 2000, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA; pp. 13-20.
Leibe, Bastian, et al., “Towards Spontaneous Interaction with the Perceptive Workbench, a Semi-Immersive Virtual Environment,” Nov./Dec. 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 54-65.
Lengyel, Jed et al., “Real-Time Robot Motion Planning Using Rasterizing Computer Graphics Hardware,” Aug. 1990, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 327-335.
Levin, Golan “Computer Vision for Artists and Designers: Pedagogic Tools and Techniques for Novice Programmers,” Aug. 2006, AI & Society, vol. 20, Issue 4, pp. 462-482.
Lin, Mingxiu et al., “A New Approach for Vision-based Rear Vehicle Tracking,” Key Laboratory of Integrated Automation of Process Industry, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China, held May 23-25, 2007, pp. 107-1.
Livingston, Mark Alan, “Vision-based Tracking with Dynamic Structured Light for Video See-through Augmented Reality,” 1998, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, cited on Jun. 18, 2007 during opposition of European Application N.
Malik, Shahzad et al., “Visual Touchpad: A Two-Handed Gestural Input Device,” Oct. 13-15, 2004, International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI '04).
Maria Langer, “Mac OS X 10.2: Visual QuickStart Guide,” Sep. 17, 2002, Peachpit Press, p. 111.
MacIver, Malcolm, et al., “Body Electric,” Apr. 15-Jun. 29, 2003, art installation, description available online at http://www.neuromech.northwestern.edu/uropatagium/#ArtSci.
Mandala Systems, “Video Gesture Control System Concept,” 1986, description available online at http://www.vividgroup.com/tech.html, downloaded on Mar. 16, 2007.
Microsoft Surface multi-touch interface table unveiled, May 30, 2007, downloaded from http://www.dancewithshadows.com/tech/microsoft-surface.asp.
Microsoft Surface Web Page, downloaded from http://www.microsoft.com/surface/Pages/Product/WhatIs.aspx on Sep. 24, 2009.
Experience Microsoft Surface, downloaded from http://www.microsoft.com/surface/Pages/Product/Specifications.aspx on Sep. 24, 2009.
Microsoft Surface, downloaded from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft—surface on Sep. 24, 2009.
Mitsubishi Diamond Touch, http://www.merl.com/projects/DiamondTouch/ visited Mar. 21, 2007.
Mo, Zhenyao “SmartCanvas: A Gesture-Driven Intelligent Drawing Desk System,” Jan. 9-12, 2005, Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '05).
Morano, Raymond A. et al., “Structured Light Using Pseudorandom Codes,” Mar. 1998, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, No. 3.
Morris, T. et al., “Real-Time Fingertip Detection for Hand Gesture Recognition,” Sep. 9-11, 2002, Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems (ACIVS '04), Ghent University, Belgium.
Muench, Wolfgang, “Bubbles”, Prix Ars Electonica Catalog 1999, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany; available online at http://hosting.zkm.de/wmuench/bub/text, downloaded on Mar. 16, 2007.
Paradiso, Joseph et al., “Optical Tracking for Music and Dance Performance,” Conference on Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques, XX, XX, No. 4th, Sep. 30, 1997, pp. 1-8, XP002548974. http://www.media.mit.edu/resenv/pubs/papers/97—09—Zurich—3D4.pdf.
Paradiso, Joseph et al., “New Sensor and Music Systems for Large Interactive Surfaces,” Aug. 2000, Proceedings of the Interactive Computer Music Conference, Berlin, Germany, pp. 277-280.
Penny, Simon, “Fugitive”; Oct. 1997; http://www.ace.uci.edu/penny/works/fugitive/fugitive.html.
Penny, Simon, et al., “Fugitive II,” Jan. 8-Mar. 14, 2004, Australian Center for the Moving Image, art installation, description available online at http://www.acmi.net.au/fugitive.jsp.
Penny, Simon, et al.; TRACES: Wireless full body tracking in the CAVE, Dec. 16-18, 1999; Japan; ICAT Virtual Reality Conference; http://turing.ace.uci.edu/pennytexts/traces/.
Pinhanez, C. et al., “Ubiquitous Interactive Graphics,” Jul. 29-31, 2003, IBM Research Report RC22495, available at http://www.research.ibm.com/ed/publications/rc22495.pdf.
Pinhanez, C., “The Everywhere Displays Projector: A Device to Create Ubiquitous Graphical Interfaces,” Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing: International Conference Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Sep. 30-Oct. 2, 2001 Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Compute.
PLASMA; 3 pages; http://www.particles.de/paradocs/plasma/index.html, cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/160,217 on Aug. 8, 2005.
Quinz, Emanuele; “Conference Papers”, Apr. 10, 2001, XP55013293, Retrieved from the internet http://www.isea2000.com/pop—actes.htm.
Quinz, Emanuele; “Digital Performance”, pp. 1-3, Retrieved from the internet on Nov. 28, 2011 http://www.noemalab.org/sections/ideas/ideas—articles/pdf/.
Reatrix, Inc. website, Mar. 28, 2003, http://web.archive.org/web/20030328234205/http://www.reatrix.com and http://web.archive.org/web/20030328234205/http://www.reatrix.com/webdemo.php.
Rekimoto, J., et al., “Perceptual Surfaces: Towards a Human and Object Sensitive Interactive Display,” Oct. 19-21, 1997, Proceedings of the Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces, Banff, Canada, pp. 30-32.
Rekimoto, Jun, “SmartSkin: An Infrastructure for Freehand Manipulation on Interactive Surfaces.” vol. No. 4, Issue No. 1, pp. 113-120, Apr. 2002.
Ringel, M. et al., “Barehands: Implement-Free Interaction with a Wall-Mounted Display,” Mar. 31-Apr. 5, 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Extended Abstracts), p. 367-368.
Rogala, Miroslav, “Lovers Leap,” Nov. 21-26, 1995, art installation, Dutch Electronic Arts Festival, description available online at http://wayback.v2.nl/DEAF/persona/rogala.html.
Rokeby, David, “Very Nervous System (VNS),” Mar. 1995, Wired Magazine, available online at <http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.03/rokeby.html>; sold as software at http://homepage.mac.com/davidrokeby/softVNS.html.
Rokeby, David, “softVNS 2 real time video processing and tracking software for Max;” SoftVNS 2 downloads, as downloaded from http://homepage.mac.com/davidrokeby/softVNS.html on Mar. 16, 2007.
Sato, Yoichi, et al., “Fast Tracking of Hands and Fingertips in Infrared Images for Augmented Desk Interface,” Mar. 2000, 4th International Conference on Automatic Face-and Gesture-Recognition, Grenoble, France.
Schneider, John K., “Improved Fingerprint System Using Rolled and Multi-segmented Techniques,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/575,952, filed Jun. 1, 2004, pp. 1-6.
Screenshots of Reactrix Product Demo Video, Mar. 28, 2003, http://web.archive.org/web/20030407174258/http://www.reactrix.com/demo/reactrix—demo.wmv.
Sester, Marie, “Access,” Dec. 2001, Interaction 99 Biennial Catalog, Gifu, Japan, available online at http://www.accessproject.net/concept.html.
Snibbe, Scott, “Boundary Functions,” Sep. 7-12, 1998, art installation, description available online at http://snibbe.com/scott/bf/index.html.
Snibbe, Scott, “Screen Series,” 2002-2003 art installation, description available online at http://snibbe.com/scott/screen/index.html, downloaded on Mar. 16, 2007.
Sonneck, Georg, et al., “Optimized One-to-One Personalization of Web Applications using a Graph Based Model,” IEEE-22, Apr. 26, 2003, 9 pgs.
Sparacino, Flavia, et al., “Dance Space: An Interactive Video Interface”, Actes/Proceeding, ISEA2000-10/12/2000-Auditorium 1, Dec. 10, 2000.
Sparacino, Flavia, et al., “Media in performance: interactive spaces for dance, theater, circus and museum exhibits,” Nov. 2000, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 39, No. 3-4, pp. 479-510.
Sparacino, Flavia, “(Some) Computer Visions Based Interfaces for Interactive Art and Entertainment Installations,” 2001, INTER—FACE Body Boundaries, Anomalie digital—arts, No. 2, Paris, France, http://alumni.media.mit.edu/˜flavia/publications.html.
Stauffer, Chris, et al., “Learning Patterns of Activity Using Real-Time Tracking,” Aug. 2000, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 747-757.
Supreme Particles, “Plasma/Architexture,” 1994, available online at http://www.particles.de/paradocs/plasma/plasma—e.html downloaded on May 21, 2007.
Supreme Particles; R111, 1999, available online at http://www.r111.org, obtained Jul. 12, 2005, XP-002989704.
Tan, et al., “Highlight Removal by Illumination-Constrained Inpainting,” Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Oct. 13-16, 2003.
The History of Microsoft Surface, downloaded from http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/surfacecomputing/docs/SurfaceHistoryBG.doc on Sep. 24, 2009.
Torr, P.H.S. et al., “The Development and Comparison of Robust Methods for Estimating the Fundamental Matrix,” Sep./Oct. 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 271-300.
Toth, Daniel et al., “Illumination-Invariant Change Detection,” Apr. 2-4, 2000, 4th IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation, p. 3.
Trefzger, Petra, “Vorwerk,” 2000, art installation, description available online at http://www.petracolor.de/ cited on Jan. 17, 2005 during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Utterback, Camille, et al., “Text Rain,”1999, art installation, available online at www.camilleutterback.com/textrain.html, Mar. 16, 2007.
Vogt, Florian et al., “Highlight Substitution in Light Fields,” IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 22-25, 2002.
Wang, Junxian, et al., “Specular reflection removal for human detection under aquatic environment,” Jun. 27-Jul. 2, 2004 IEEE Conference on Computer and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW04) vol. 8, p. 130.
Wellner, Pierre, “Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk,” Jul. 1993, Communications of the ACM, Special issue on computer augmented environments: back to the real world, vol. 36, Issue 7, pp. 87-96.
Wellner, Pierre, “Digital Desk Calculator:Tangible Manipulation on a Desktop Display” Proceedings of the Symposium on User Interface Software and Technol (UIST), Hilton Head, S. Carolina, Nov. 11-13, 1991.
Wilson, Andrew, “PlayAnywhere: A Compact Interactive Tabletop Projection-Vision System,” ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), Oct. 23-27, 2005, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
Xiao, Yang; “Throughput and Delay Limits of IEEE 802.11,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 355-357, Aug. 2002.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2004/035477, filed Oct. 25, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/035477, filed Oct. 25, 2004.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2004/035477, filed Oct. 25, 2004.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2004/041318, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/041318, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2004/041318, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2006/030720, filed on Aug. 4, 2006.
International Search Report for PCT/US2006/030720, filed Aug. 4, 2006.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2006/030720, filed Aug. 4, 2006.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2005/008984, filed Mar. 18, 2005.
International Search Report for PCT/US2005/008984, filed Mar. 18, 2005.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2005/008984, filed Mar. 18, 2005.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2004/041320, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/041320, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2004/041320, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2004/041319, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/041319, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2004/041319, filed Dec. 9, 2004.
Article 96(2) Communication dated in European Application No. 02739710.8, Mar. 31, 2004.
Observation by third party Michael Saup cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8 filed Jun. 4, 2002, dated Jan. 17, 2005.
Observation by third party Petra Trefzger cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8 filed Jun. 4, 2002, dated Jan. 17, 2005.
Observation by third party Simon Penny cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8 filed Jun. 4, 2002, dated Jan. 17, 2005.
Article 96(2) Communication in European Application No. 02739710.8, dated Feb. 25, 2005.
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings in European Application No. 02739710.8, dated Aug. 12, 2005.
Notice of Opposition in European Application No. 02739710.8 dated May 14, 2007.
Letter dated from Christian Zuckschwerdt regarding EffecTV, (partial machine translation), cited during opposition of European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002, May 16, 2007.
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings in European Application No. 02739710.8, dated Jun. 12, 2009.
Decision revoking the European Patent in European Application No. 02739710.8, dated Dec. 28, 2009.
Provision of the minutes in European Application No. 02739710.8, dated Dec. 28, 2009.
Letter of the opponent O2 in European Application No. 02739710.8, filed Jun. 4, 2002, dated May 28, 2010.
Notice of Opposition in European Application No. 02739710.8, dated Aug. 23, 2010.
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US2002/017843, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
Written Opinion for PCT/US2002/017843, filed Jun. 4, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US2002/017843, filed Jun. 4, 2002, dated Feb. 5, 2003.
Extended Search Report for European Application No. 06010825.5, filed Jun. 4, 2002, dated Jul. 6, 2006.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2004/035478, filed Oct. 25, 2004.
International Search Report for PCT/US2004/035478, filed Oct. 25, 2004.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2004/035478, filed Oct. 25, 2004.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial international Search Report on Patentability for PCT/US2004/035478, filed Oct. 25, 2004.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2008/059900, filed on Apr. 10, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/059900, filed Apr. 10, 2008.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2008/059900, filed Apr. 10, 2008.
Official Report in Australian Application No. 2008299883, dated Dec. 8, 2010.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2008/10750, filed Sep. 15, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/US2008/10750, filed Sep. 15, 2008.
International Search Report for PCT/US03/40321, filed Dec. 15, 2003.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated Nov. 12, 2010.
Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated Dec. 20, 2010.
Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated May 12, 2011.
Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated Jul. 6, 2011.
Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated Jul. 14, 2011.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated Aug. 18, 2011.
Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated Oct. 14, 2011.
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/269,849, dated Dec. 2, 2011.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120200843 A1 Aug 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60987315 Nov 2007 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12269849 Nov 2008 US
Child 13448321 US