Patent Grant
9465191
Contemporary lenses are designed/optimized to focus on a planar image surface. However, optical lens systems do not generally have their best focus on a planar imaging surface. For example, spherical lens systems tend to best focus on a roughly hemispherical surface, called the Petzval surface. Much of the complexity of lens design is in forcing the lens system to achieve best focus on a planar imaging surface, far away from the Petzval surface.
Developments in sensor technology have yielded somewhat low resolution curved sensors (with the resolution likely to increase in the future) that provide for improved quality of images. However, with such curved sensors, lenses optimized for planar image surfaces are inappropriate.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of representative concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used in any way that would limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Briefly, one or more of various aspects of the subject matter described herein are directed towards multi-element lens assemblies. One example implementation comprises a refractive object-side element having a positive object-facing surface, and one or more lenses optically coupled to the object-side element and configured to focus light onto a curved surface. Another example implementation comprises an object-side subassembly having overall positive refraction, and an image-side subassembly optically coupled to the object-side subassembly. The image-side subassembly is configured to receive light from the object-side subassembly and focus the received light onto a curved surface.
Other advantages may become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limited in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
Various aspects of the technology described herein are generally directed towards multiple lens (multi-lens) assemblies configured to focus on a curved surface, such as a hemispherical or substantially hemispherical surface, e.g., a curved sensor. Two, three and four element multi-lens assemblies are exemplified herein, however it is understood that multi-lens assemblies having more than four elements, up to any practical number, are feasible. Further, wherever two or more lenses as shown as physically coupled, it is feasible to have a single lens ground, molded or otherwise manufactured as a single element provided that the materials were the same.
It should be understood that any of the examples herein are non-limiting. For instance, any of the refractive optical elements shown herein may be made of any suitable material, e.g., glass or plastic, and such materials may be used alone or in any combination in any lens assembly. Further, one or more reflective elements may be present instead of or in addition to refractive optical elements. As such, the present invention is not limited to any particular embodiments, aspects, concepts, structures, functionalities or examples described herein. Rather, any of the embodiments, aspects, concepts, structures, functionalities or examples described herein are non-limiting, and the present invention may be used various ways that provide benefits and advantages in lens technology in general.
The positive meniscus lens 102 is coupled to a generally biconvex lens 104 to focus light onto a curved surface 108. As can be seen in
The lenses 102 and 104 are shown as physically coupled, however it is understood that they may be separated by a suitable gap filled with any liquid or gas, including air. The lenses 102 and 104 may be made of plastic, glass, or one plastic, one glass, for example. The following show data of one example implementation corresponding to
The following show data of one example implementation corresponding to
In the two-element design, in general there is a high negative conic constant, and hence large relative asphericity. Correction of coma and astigmatism may be done as with the three-element design as described below, and is generally based upon the surfaces remote from the stop and solving simultaneously for zero SII and SIII:
0=SII+ε2·S*I2+ε3·S*I3
0=SIII+ε22·S*I2+ε32·S*I3
where SII and SIII are the coma and astigmatism terms of the whole system before correction, respectively, ε2 and ε3 are the ratio of the principal and marginal ray heights at the second and third surfaces and SI2* and SI3* are the additional spherical aberration terms at the second and third surfaces.
Given the relative size of the Δn at those boundaries for optical materials used in the visible, it is apparent that the actual asphericity in terms of surface sag needs to be larger at surface two than at surface three.
Although as in
The following show data of one example implementation corresponding to
The following show data of one example implementation corresponding to
The following show data of one example implementation corresponding to
In general, some of the exemplified designs are relatively wide-aperture and wide-field and may be constructed using high-order aspheres. Designs may be re-optimized for a lower aperture, and higher-order terms may be dropped. This brings the designs within reach of a description using first-order and third-order wavefront expansions—the domain in which Seidel aberration analysis is appropriate and hence enables the optical function of the various surfaces to be explained.
The lens elements are in general thick in comparison to their separation and therefore a thin-lens solution is not appropriate.
In these designs, field curvature is effectively left to float and the image sensor is placed at the Petzval surface. Note that distortion correction is desirable in principle, but the effect of correcting distortion is to flatten the image field and hence negate some of the benefits of the curved image field so it is left uncorrected.
Note that even without the aspheres, the system at moderate apertures is well-corrected for the first three primary monochromatic aberrations. The primary offender is astigmatism, and there are only a few wavelengths of this at f/4; by comparison a thin-lens of similar power at the stop would have about 21 wavelengths of astigmatism. Low starting aberrations tend to be helpful to the design.
In one aspect, the design is pseudo-symmetric, which makes coma and transverse color low by default. The design is also generally pseudo-centro-symmetric, which makes coma and astigmatism low at the external surfaces of the lens (the principal ray is roughly normal to the surface).
One or more implementations start with a positive curvature (as with most lenses), as well as having the first element overall positive to help minimize total track. One or more implementations use one aplanatic surface before the stop and/or in which the marginal ray is close to normal at this surface, and make the surface at the stop nearly concentric with the preceding surface. The curvature may be used to control astigmatism as desired.
The buried surface both corrects for longitudinal color and introduces overcorrected (negative) spherical aberration, which helps compensate for that at the external surfaces of the lens.
If an implementation allows aspheres, astigmatism maybe corrected by introducing an asphere into a surface remote from the stop. The effect of the asphere is to introduce a spherical aberration term that, dependent on the ratio of the principal ray height to the marginal ray height will correct some or all of the astigmatism. However, there is likely some coma. Because this was already low, this additional coma is corrected in another surface.
Correcting the residual spherical aberration can be done by an asphere at the stop. One basic approach finds a Gaussian solution that gives low lateral and longitudinal color, ignoring field curvature but using some of the resulting freedom to minimize total track, which is helpful if a solution has low coma and spherical aberration overall so that aspherics do not have to be excessive. Astigmatism may be corrected using a back surface (or the surface furthest from the stop). Coma may be corrected using a front surface (or the surface next furthest from the stop). Remaining spherical aberration may be corrected using the surface at the stop
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrated embodiments thereof are shown in the drawings and have been described above in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the specific forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8638500 | Gallagher et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 20050219716 | Koike | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20130003196 | Guenter et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130063634 | Yamano | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130076900 | Mrozek et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2008-249909 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| “International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/042799”, Mailed Date: Oct. 16, 2014, 12 pages. |
| “International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/042799”, Mailed Date: Sep. 2, 2015, 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140376113 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
