The present invention relates to less-than-lethal ammunition, such as rubber and plastic bullets, sponge grenades, and bean bag rounds, the projectiles of which expand or disintegrate upon impact, characterized by little or no penetration into a target and with the intended effect of pain compliance, stunning or target-marking of persons for law enforcement, riot control and the like.
In law enforcement, penal, self-defense, and military tactical situations, there is an increasing demand for non-lethal force options. An increasing emphasis has been placed on stopping or disabling a targeted individual without serious injury or death, and with significantly reduced risk to any non-targeted bystanders. Many options are viable for use at close range (approx. 10 m or less), including riot shields and batons, electroshock weapons, dazzlers and stun grenades, net guns, and chemical lachrymator sprays (such as capsaicin). The options for intermediate and longer ranges generally require some kind of projectile.
A variety of different less-than-lethal kinetic impact projectile weapons are now available. The term “less-than-lethal” is the preferred term rather than “non-lethal” because no projectile weapon of this kind is entirely foolproof and unintended deaths have been known to sometimes occur. For example, firing at too short a distance may deliver too much kinetic energy to the target, resulting in increased risk of penetration or blunt trauma. Likewise, missing the targeted chest area and instead hitting the face could result in concussion or blindness. The different available baton rounds have different amount of risk in this regard because of differences in firing accuracy and in the distribution or spread of the kinetic energy over the impacted area. A stable flight trajectory and the ability the projectile to expand its diameter and dissipate its energy upon impact are both required for safe operation.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,012,395, Saxby describes a baton projectile having a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) case and a soft core of thermoplastic gel modified rubber. An air pocket between the core and the front of the case reduces the speed of sound of the impact shockwave to reduce the risk of unacceptable bone injury. At higher than acceptable impact force, the case will rupture and the core spreads out to radially disperse the excess impact energy.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,028, Guillot-Ulmann et al. describe a very highly deformable projectile in which a flexible, elastic, and infrangible envelope is filled with fine grains of solid filler material which flattens and spreads upon impact with a target to minimize trauma. In another embodiment, the envelope can rupture and deliver an incapacitating chemical in powder form.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,283,037, Sclafani describes a non-lethal shotgun round wherein the projectile is an elastomeric bag filled with a packed particulate load, optionally with a dye for marking a target. The elastomeric bag is designed to rupture upon impact dispersing the particulate matter and imparting a force sufficient to stun the target. In U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0027124, Sclafani introduces a cylindrical foam liner surrounding the projectile to contain the round during flight for better trajectory guidance and which, upon impact, deforms the elastomeric bag to a wider surface area before rupture for a reduced risk of injury.
In U.S. Pat. No. 8,671,841, Raquin et al. describe a kinetic projectile with controlled, non-lethal effects having an external casing made of low hardness material (30 to 50 Shore hardness is recommended) that is a highly deformable elastic or viscoelastic polymer with an elongation at break in excess of 100%, and an internal structure made of low-density cellular material (such as a foam polymer) with an elongation at break of less than 10%. A cavity within the internal structure could contain a material of different elastic deformation properties to produce “complementary effects” (spring compression, buckling, creeping, etc.), while another cavity could embed a payload (such as a pyrotechnic composition to make a deafening sound with a blinding light).
In U.S. Patent Application Publication 2014/0109790, Dannawi et al. describe a less lethal projectile having an overall cylindrical shape with an approximately spherical front-end cap or outer case made of a thermoplastic (e.g., EPDM) foam about 1 to 3 mm thick, a core made of a stabilized aluminum foam with a low density of about 300 kg/m3 to limit the impact force, a rear base, and a cylindrical blind recess at the back end of the core just in front of the rear base that could be filled or left empty to tailor beforehand the impact force profile and projectile effectiveness according to the severity sought.
A less-than-lethal kinetic impact projectile and an associated less-than-lethal ammunition round are provided. The projectile has a sealed cylindrical elastomeric bag with a particulate load therein and with a deformable hollow nose cap forwardly attached to a front of the cylindrical elastomeric bag. The round has a cylindrical casing with an ignitable propellant powder charge disposed therein, and the projectile nested within the casing forwardly of the propellant powder charge. In operation, the elastomeric bag with deformable hollow nose cap will expand in diameter but remain intact when impacting against a soft or semi-soft target (e.g., the body of a human being or animal), but will tend to fragment or disintegrate upon impact with a hard or semi-hard target (e.g., against concrete or wood).
In one embodiment, the deformable hollow nose cap could have a substantially hemispherical shape with a hollow interior. It may be composed of a polymer with a Shore type-A durometer hardness of 50±10 and an ultimate elongation of at least 250%, such as an ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) or silicone elastomer. The elastomeric bag itself could either have a self-supporting cylindrical shape or, if a flexible polymer membrane, be surrounded by a rigid but fragmentable-upon-impact outer cylindrical collar lining.
With reference to
Both the bag 15 and attached nose cap 13 are composed of an elastomeric material which is a polymer with a Shore type-A durometer hardness of 50±10 and an ultimate elongation of at least 250%. For example, they may be composed of a material selected from any of an ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) elastomer and a silicone elastomer. The elastomer material used may be of any color, which may be desirable to help visibly distinguish the rounds from otherwise similar lethal rounds. Different textures on the outside of the cylindrical portion 15 of the projectile 11 are also possible to give the rounds a distinctive feel. The bag 15 and nose cap 13 could be composed of identical material; although this is not strictly necessary, so the nose cap 13 could be made up of a different elastomer from the bag 15. The deformable hollow nose cap 13 could have a 2 mm (0.08 inch) thickness at its forward impact zone 12 and a 1 mm (0.04 inch) thickness where it attaches to the front end 14 of the cylindrical elastomeric bag 15. The front end 14 of the cylindrical bag 15 could be reinforced against breakage with a band of thicker elastomer than the rest of the cylindrical bag 15.
The elastomeric bag 15 preferably has a self-supporting cylindrical shape to generally maintain its shape in flight for maximum trajectory stability. However, if the bag 15 is made of a more flexible polymer membrane material that is not self-supporting, it can be surrounded by a relatively more rigid but fragmentable-upon-impact outer cylindrical collar lining 16, such as a foam polymer, to allow the projectile to generally hold its shape in flight. Such a collar 16 around the outside of the projectile also increases the rigidity and helps ensure that projectile dissipates energy on impact without increasing the possibility of penetrating the target. If desired, it could be used even where the bag material has a self-supporting cylindrical shape.
The projectile 11 has a diameter that is selected to fit within a desired ammunition casing. A wide variety of platforms can be supported in a range from 7.62 mm (0.30 inch) to 20 mm (0.787 inch) diameters. For example, if the projectile is desired to be used with a 12-gauge shotgun, it may have a 18 mm (0.71 inch) outer diameter to fit snuggly within the plastic hull of a 12-gauge shotgun-type casing.
The cylindrical elastomeric bag portion 15 of the projectile 11 is partially filled with an inert load material 17. The ammunition could be assembled with any type of inert material upon request. It could also include a colored dye, if requested. The interior of the cylindrical elastomeric bag 15 could have any of a variety of textures from smooth to rugged to affect the behavior of the load material during flight and upon impact with the introduction of a specified amount of internal wall friction. The back end 18 of the cylinder bag 15 is then sealed with a base 19 to keep all the material inside the bag 15 and give it stability in the round casing. This base 19 could also be formed of a more rigid polymer material than the bag 15 with a generally planar circular disc shape and with an annular projecting lip or rim 20 that fits snuggly within the back 18 of the cylindrical bag 15. The projectile 11 may have a total mass in a range 17.17±0.97 grams (265±15 grains).
In manufacture, the back seal 19 would typically be attached to back 18 of the projectile's elastomeric bag 15 after it has been filled and sealed with the particulate load material 17. The base 19 fitting into the cylinder 15 has an internal rim 20 to properly secure the particulate material 17 within, being secured with an adhesive to the back end of the bag. The assembled projectile 11 is now ready to be inserted into a prepared round casing.
With reference to
With reference to
The round's trajectory stability provides a typical capability of impacting within a circle of about 23 cm (9 inches) diameter at a standard recommended safe range (e.g., at 25 m or 80 ft) in a testing scenario. The accuracy of the shot naturally increases the closer the target becomes, and the opposite occurs when the intended target is further away. Real life field applications and hyper-dynamic “combat mode” situations are quite different, with our human limitations and circumstances of the unfolding events making it a more difficult task to place multiple shots near the same spot on the target(s), especially if target acquisition and accuracy is compromised.
While it is in flight towards the target, the air resistance affects the soft nose tip 13, as well as the outside wall around the cylindrical elastomeric sack 15. Specifically, the air resistance will cause a small deformation on the soft tip nose 13 by pushing back the inert particular load material 17 and air inside the cylinder 15. This causes a rear push of the load material 17 (a turbulent “mini-storm” with mixture of hot air and inert material) and starts the weakening process of the rear sealed cup 19 on the rim area.
Upon impacting any target 31 from very hard to very soft, the projectile 11 will experience some type of deformation such as flattening or changing into various shapes to accommodate the hollow nose cap 13 and the loaded cylinder 15 behind it. Impact energies at 30 m (100 ft) will typically range from 100 J to 300 J (75 to 220 ft-lb). Once the projectile 11 has impacted the target 31, it is going to experience a cross-section increase at the front band area 14 where the hollow nose cap 13 is attached to the cylindrical sack 15. Due to its forward momentum, the inert load material 17 and air that are loosely distributed inside the cylindrical elastomeric sack 15 during flight will move suddenly forward at the instant that the target 31 is impacted and then as a reaction of the target resistance and the depression of the front nose end 13 of the projectile 11 suddenly will ricochet or push back towards the cylinder's rear end cap 19, seeking a way out.
The above action (deformation of the hollow nose cap 13 and the forward-backward movement of the load material 17) causes a kinetic energy release upon impacting any type of target, and an internal energy collapse, bursting, or fragmenting of the elastomeric sack 15 upon impact with hard or semi-hard targets, and therefore avoids penetration and minimizes risk of any damage. The hardness of the target 31 will determine the rapidity of the projectile's deceleration and the deformation of the projectile. The cylindrical side walls 15 of the projectile 11 may bow outward (as seen in
The accumulated kinetic energy stored in the projectile 11 is released and allowed to pass through into the target and achieve the desired results, such as pain compliance either upon a human or animal target. If the projectile impacts a hard target (e.g., concrete), it should burst, fragment, or disintegrate by hard resistance of the target to release 99% of its kinetic energy into the target, with no penetration. Likewise, if it directly impacts a medium-hard target (e.g., wood), it is likely (and preferably should) burst, fragment, or disintegrate by medium resistance of the target to release 66% of its kinetic energy into the target (the remainder be dissipated as the load material sprays out the back of the now ruptured projectile, again with no penetration. If the projectile instead impacts a soft or medium-soft target (e.g., the body of a human or animal), it will normally remain intact without bursting or disintegrating (except for any rigid collar), releasing about 33% of its kinetic energy into the target without penetration. This assumes the target is not too close, so impact occurs within the projectile's mandated safe operating range.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3074344 | Henri | Jan 1963 | A |
3650213 | Abbott | Mar 1972 | A |
6012395 | Saxby | Jan 2000 | A |
6178890 | Burczynski | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6240850 | Holler | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283037 | Sclafani | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302028 | Guillot-Ulmann et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305292 | Burczynski et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6393992 | Vasil et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6530328 | Burczynski et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543365 | Vasil et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6722283 | Dindl et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6736070 | Baltos | May 2004 | B2 |
6807908 | Brydges-Price | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7278357 | Keith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7415929 | Faughn | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7743709 | Kolnik | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8205556 | Keith et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8511231 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8671841 | Raquin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9021959 | Hayes | May 2015 | B2 |
9140528 | Thomas | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9182202 | Menefee, III | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9423222 | Thomas | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9429405 | Balzano | Aug 2016 | B1 |
10088287 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10527394 | Raquin | Jan 2020 | B2 |
11009321 | Buys | May 2021 | B2 |
20050016412 | Vasel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060027124 | Sclafani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20140109790 | Dannawi | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140230680 | Meller | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2005098344 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2006111719 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2009141521 | Nov 2009 | WO |