The exemplary and non-limiting embodiments relate generally to rendering of free-viewpoint audio for presentation to a user using a spatial rendering engine.
Free-viewpoint audio generally allows for a user to move around in the audio (or generally, audio-visual or mediated reality) space and experience the audio space in a manner that correctly corresponds to his location and orientation in it. This may enable various virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) use cases. The spatial audio may consist, for example, of a channel-based bed and audio-objects, audio-objects only, or any equivalent spatial audio representation. While moving in the space, the user may come into contact with audio-objects, the user may distance themselves considerably from other objects, and new objects may also appear. The listening/rendering point may thereby adapt to the user's movement, and the user may interact with the audio-objects, and/or the audio content may otherwise evolve due to the changes relative to the rendering point or user action.
The following summary is merely intended to be exemplary. The summary is not intended to limit the scope of the claims.
In accordance with one aspect, an example method comprises, obtaining a listening position in an audio space; obtaining audio and metadata corresponding to a rendering at the listening position; obtaining a listening environment and determining an effect of the listening environment on the rendering at the listening position; detecting audio interaction at the listening position by comparing an audio rendering level against a corresponding level threshold metadata; applying, by a processing device, an audio modification according to the audio interaction detection; and rendering audio at the listening position based on the applied audio modification.
In accordance with another aspect, an example apparatus comprises at least one processor; and at least one non-transitory memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to: obtain a listening position in an audio space; obtain audio and metadata corresponding to a rendering at the listening position; obtain a listening environment and determine an effect of the listening environment on the rendering at the listening position; detect audio interaction at the listening position by comparing an audio rendering level against a corresponding level threshold metadata; apply an audio modification according to the audio interaction detection; and render audio at the listening position based on the applied audio modification.
In accordance with another aspect, an example apparatus comprises a non-transitory program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine for performing operations, the operations comprising: obtaining a listening position associated with a user; obtaining audio and metadata corresponding to a rendering at the listening position; obtaining a listening environment and determining an effect of the listening environment on the rendering at the listening position; detecting audio interaction at the listening position by comparing an audio rendering level against a corresponding level threshold metadata; applying an audio modification according to the audio interaction detection; and rendering audio at the listening position based on the applied audio modification.
The foregoing aspects and other features are explained in the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
The system 100 generally comprises a visual system 110, an audio system 120, a relative location system 130 and a level based audio object rendering system 140. The visual system 110 is configured to provide visual images to a user. For example, the visual system 12 may comprise a virtual reality (VR) headset, goggles or glasses. The audio system 120 is configured to provide audio sound to the user, such as by one or more speakers, a VR headset, or ear buds for example. The relative location system 130 is configured to sense a location of the user, such as the user's head for example, and determine the location of the user in the realm of the reality content consumption space. The movement in the reality content consumption space may be based on actual user movement, user-controlled movement, and/or some other externally-controlled movement or pre-determined movement, or any combination of these. The user is able to move and turn their head in the content consumption space of the free-viewpoint. The relative location system 130 may be able to change what the user sees and hears based upon the user's movement in the real-world; that real-world movement changing what the user sees and hears in the free-viewpoint rendering.
The movement of the user, interaction with audio-objects and things seen and heard by the user may be defined by predetermined parameters including an effective distance parameter and a reversibility parameter. An effective distance parameter may be a core parameter that defines the distance from which user interaction is considered for the current audio-object. In some embodiments, the effective distance parameter may also be considered a modification adjustment parameter, which may be applied to modification of interactions, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/293,607, filed Oct. 14, 2016, which is hereby incorporated by reference. A reversibility parameter may also be considered a core parameter, and may define the reversibility of the interaction response. The reversibility parameter may also be considered a modification adjustment parameter. Although particular modes of audio-object interaction are described herein for ease of explanation, brevity and simplicity, it should be understood that the methods described herein may be applied to other types of audio-object interactions.
The user may be virtually located in the free-viewpoint content space, or in other words, receive a rendering corresponding to a location in the free-viewpoint rendering. Audio-objects may be rendered to the user at this user location. The area around a selected listening point may be defined based on user input, based on use case or content specific settings, and/or based on particular implementations of the audio rendering. Additionally, the area may in some embodiments be defined at least partly based on an indirect user or system setting such as the overall output level of the system (for example, some sounds may not be audible when the sound pressure level at the output is reduced). In such instances the output level input to an application may result in particular sounds being not rendered because the sound level associated with these audio-objects may be considered imperceptible from the listening point. In other instances, distant sounds with higher output levels (such as, for example, an explosion or similar loud event) may be exempted from the requirement (in other words, these sounds may be rendered). A process such as dynamic range control may also affect the rendering, and therefore the area, if the audio output level is considered in the area definition.
The level based audio object rendering system 140 is configured to implement a parameterized audio-object interaction detection and rendering control via tracking of the listening position for audio rendering volume level. By considering the sound pressure level of the audio at the listening position, the contribution of the spatial audio environment automatically is taken into account. The level based audio object rendering system 140 may furthermore determine metadata for parameterized audio-object interaction detection and rendering control via tracking of the listening position for audio rendering volume level.
The audio-object interaction may be defined as a modification of the audio-object rendering for presentation to the user due to a triggering based on at least a user position in the spatial audio scene overlapping with an audio object position. While this locational conflict abnormality may be defined in some systems or example embodiments based on a metadata parameter specifying at least a first distance between the user and the audio object, the level based audio object rendering system 140 may require no distance metadata to determine an overlap or audio-object interaction. Instead, the level based audio object rendering system 140 may use metadata related to perception of the audio (for example, the volume or level per frequency bin) to determine the overlap. Thus, the level based audio object rendering system 140 may automatically take into account the room acoustics contribution of an individual audio object for its interaction control. The level estimation may generally be done per frequency bin and these measures may then be combined into a single measure, for example, in a manner incorporating psychoacoustics.
Considering the above, level based audio object rendering system 140 may allow both 1) an alternative implementation for audio-object interactions significantly differing from the distance based systems and 2) an improvement over the distance based systems in terms of providing a capability to adjust for sound pressure and a spatial environment.
Referring also to
Referring also to
In instances in which sound is detected by microphones (in a similar manner as by ears), the sound is determined based on sound pressure. In acoustics, the sound pressure of a spherical wave-front that radiates from a point source is known to decrease by 6.02 dB with a doubling of the distance. This corresponds to a decrease of 50%, or a halving, of the sound pressure. Accordingly, the sound pressure decreases as 1/r, while the sound intensity decreases as 1/r2. This may be reflected in the sound that the user 310 experiences as they move throughout the audiovisual free-viewpoint VR experience 300.
Referring also to
Referring back to
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may provide support for processes of audio-object interactions in spatial audio environments. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may process the interactions such that for two instances of an audio object, such as those illustrated in
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may consider the spatial audio environment for audio-object interactions. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may factor the environment into renderings in order to provide the most immersive user experience for the user. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may provide processes that correspond to the dynamic nature of the audiovisual environment itself, and reduce or eliminate a necessity for manual controls of the spatial audio environment through separate parameters, which may become a time and/or resource consuming task. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may allow for creating (or be incorporated into) more efficient content creation tools.
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may implement a parameterized audio-object interaction detection and rendering control system, based on tracking of the listening position audio rendering volume level. The listening position in the audio space may be associated with a user and, in some example embodiments, may be a free-view and in other example embodiments 3DoF AR/VR. The audio space may refer to the AR/VR space populated by one or more audio sources. The user may have a listening position in this space, and the listening position (which may include the head rotation of the user) affects the rendering. By considering the sound pressure or volume level of the audio at the listening position in an audio space, level based audio object rendering system 140 may automatically take into account the contribution of the spatial audio environment. This is because the environment directly contributes to the listening position sound pressure through reflections etc. In instances in which the level based audio object rendering system 140 only considers the direct sound (for example, for complexity reasons) the level based audio object interaction rendering system 140 may behave similarly (for example, determine audio objects interactions in a similar manner) to systems which determine tracking solely based on distance information. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may track the distance between the listening position and the audio object. The acoustic space may not have an effect on this distance. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may detect and measure the effect of the environment on the audio-object interaction.
The listening environment may refer to the part of the audio space that may affect (for example, by modeling of the geometry etc.) the rendering of at least the audio source under consideration (for example, an audio interaction) at the user's listening position in the audio space. The listening environment may in some instances refer to the physical space of the user but does not necessarily correspond to the physical space. For example, with regard to VR use cases, the listening environment may not correspond to a physical space as the system attempts to remove the user from the real world. In instances of AR, the physical space may actually be the listening environment. However, in an example advanced AR use case, the rendering may take into account the physical space around the user as well as a virtual (augmented) element of the audio space.
In some example embodiments, the spatial audio environment effects such as reverberation may be evaluated and utilized for the audio-object interaction detection and control separately from the direct sound pressure.
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may improve a content creator's ability to take into account various aspects of the 6DoF audio environment and experience thus allowing for improved user experience. In some instances, a content creator may provide instructions to have the spatial audio environment not implement an effect on the audio-object interactions, for example by defining a metadata flag to override this functionality. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may therefore allow the content creator to enable either 1) audio object interactions that do not factor the spatial environment or 2) audio object interactions that factor the spatial environment, depending on the use case.
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may be implemented in a standalone audio-interaction rendering system, and may also be used in conjunction with systems that determine renderings of audio object interactions based (for example, only) on distance metadata. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may be implemented, for example, through defining a set of parameters that are stored and transmitted as audio-object metadata. Alternatively, such metadata may refer to a channel, a track, or, for example, a set of directional audio sub-band components or parameters. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may be implemented in a spatial audio rendering software product and in any hardware product that allows for 6DoF immersive audio experiences.
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may enable intuitive audio-object interactions that may automatically take room acoustic properties into account to provide improved realism and immersion.
Referring also to
As shown in
In instances in which a reduced interaction is detected (step 540), the system may apply adjustment based on reversibility 570 and send the modification information to an audio object spatial rendering engine 580. In instances in which an increased audio object interaction is detected (step 550), the system may apply adjustment based on effective distance 560 and send the modification information to an audio object spatial rendering engine 580. The audio object spatial modification engine may take care of applying the modification of the audio-object for rendering/presentation to the user.
Referring also to
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may apply processes so that the audio-object interaction modification of a single audio object performed by the modification engine acoustically differs between an open space and a closed space. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may provide the content creator with intuitive and efficient tools to take requirements of differences between open spaces and closed spaces into account in designing an overall user experience. Level based audio object rendering system 140 may provide an alternative method of interaction detection to adding parameters to the framework proposed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/293,607, filed Oct. 14, 2016.
Audio object default rendering component 610 may determine a default audio rendering based on an audio-object interaction paradigm based on tracking at least one object-to-user distance. As the distance between the audio source and the listener also relates to a change in sound pressure, audio object default rendering component 610 may use the sound pressure of the audio object as observed at the listening position as the basis for determining the triggering and the strength of the audio-object interaction.
Audio object default rendering component 610 may (at least to some degree) define the effect of the spatial audio environment to listener percept in terms of the volume level (or sound pressure). Further, to control further changes in user's percept due to the spatial audio environment, such as reverberance, audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may also consider measures or parameters related to such effects.
Audio object default rendering component 610 may observe at least the rendering of each audio object in the current spatial audio environment at the user's listening position (for example, the rendering position). Audio object default rendering component 610 may define as ‘default rendering’ the rendering of the audio-object at the user listening position in absence of any audio-interaction.
Audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may obtain (for example, at least in some embodiments also) the corresponding rendering under an ongoing audio-object interaction. Audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may thereby take into account for example a position change of the audio object due to the audio-object interaction.
The default rendering may in some example embodiments include the effect of the spatial audio environment, meaning the reflections or even obstacles (which may in some example embodiments include other users) that may affect the direct sound. In some example embodiments, the default rendering may not include these effects related to the environment. In these instances, audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may provide an implementation of the audio object interactions in which no explicit distance metadata is used.
Audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may compare the default rendering against at least one threshold that the content creator may provide instructions to the system to generally define (for example, via an entry to a metadata field that is part of a content download). This may be a relative measure based on the direct audio object time-domain signal where the time of travel between the audio source and the user's listening point has been compensated for. Thus, the measure may be a single value or it may be, for example, a time-varying threshold envelope depending on the implementation. The threshold may be a measure of sound pressure or a measure related to sound pressure. The threshold may be, for example, a value expressed in decibels (dB). This time-varying threshold envelope may allow a different interaction response strength at different times. The interaction response may vary according to playback time of the audio, playback time of the whole experience, or a particular time-based input that is provided.
Audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may determine the case of an ongoing audio-object interaction and the detection of a new audio-object interaction in separate manners. This is for two reasons. Firstly, audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may implement separate thresholds for triggering an audio-object interaction and maintaining one.
Audio object interaction adjustment component 620 may implement these different thresholds in a similar manner as the first distance parameter effective distance and other modification parameter reversibility are implemented, by way of example, in
Level based audio object rendering system 140 may be implemented with other audio object interaction systems such as a spatial audio rendering point extension (for example using a system such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/412,561, filed Jan. 23, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference) and smooth rendering of overlapping audio-object interactions (for example using a system such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/463,513, filed Mar. 20, 2017, which is hereby incorporated by reference). These systems may be exploited in conjunction with level based audio object rendering system 140, which may provide audio-object interaction detection based on the level of the percept.
As shown in
At step 710, the system may determine whether the audio object rendering was previously under interaction. If the audio object rendering was previously under interaction (715, yes), the system may compare a sound pressure measure (for example, related to interaction of the rendering) against an active threshold 720 and determine if the sound pressure measure is equal to or exceeds the threshold 725. If the sound pressure measure equals or exceeds the threshold (yes, over 735), the system may apply an audio object interaction adjustment 740 and send modification information to audio object spatial rendering engine 630. If the sound pressure measure is under the threshold (no, 770), the system may phase out interaction and send corresponding information to audio object spatial rendering engine 630 (step 750).
At step 710, if the audio object rendering was not previously under interaction 725, no, the system may compare the sound pressure measure against a trigger threshold 730 and determine if the sound pressure measure is equal to or exceeds the threshold 755. If the sound pressure measure equals or exceeds the trigger threshold (yes, over 760), the system may apply an audio object interaction adjustment 740 and send modification information to audio object spatial rendering engine 630. If the sound pressure measure is under the trigger threshold (no, 775), the system may send default information to audio object spatial rendering engine 630 (step 765).
Step 765 (for example, send default information to audio object spatial rendering engine 630) and step 750 (for example, phase out interaction and send corresponding information to audio object spatial rendering engine) may be the same in some example embodiments. At least in some example embodiments, an audio-object interaction that ends may be phased out using a specific set of modification parameters that differ from both the default rendering and the audio-object interaction rendering. The content creator may, for example, provide instructions to make it clear for a user that an audio-object interaction has just ended. The content creator may define a response, for example, based on an audio effect/processing that is rendered according to a metadata setting that is stored in the content stream. This may be achieved, for example, by using a specific (for example, particular visual, haptic and/or aural) effect. The user may be presented with audio according to the set metadata. The user may experience the effect and thereby understand that a change in rendering, the interaction has ended.
The sound pressure measure and the (active and trigger) thresholds relate to the audio-object audio, which may be available for the system (or rendered by the system). Thus, the system may require no other calibration or reference volume level. However, in some example embodiments there may be at least one calibration level or other reference (such as a reference signal), which may be utilized for example for purposes of dynamic range control (DRC).
In some example embodiments, the system may separately compare the direct sound and reflections. This may be done, for example, in order not to duplicate a reverberation effect. Such duplication may happen, for example, if a user interacts with an audio object in a highly reverberant space and the interaction metadata associated with the audio source or object (including instructions provided by the content, reflecting the content creator's choice of interaction effect) also consists of a reverb effect. Thus, the audio object spatial modification engine 630 may in such instances ignore a specific audio-object interaction modification (such as the reverb effect), and it may, at least in some example embodiments, substitute this with another effect. In some example embodiments, a secondary effect may be communicated by the content creator using a metadata entry.
At block 810, the system may obtain the listening position (the virtual user position). This may include the listening position and rotation associated with the user.
At block 820, based on the listening position, the system may then obtain the audio (such as audio objects) to be rendered to the user for this position. At least in some example embodiments, the user rotation may already be considered in these steps.
At block 830, the system may obtain the listening environment description or model of the environment. This model may specify how the audio rendering is modified by the environment at the listening position. This may include reflections, damping by various materials, and in some example embodiments, active scene understanding such as the effect of other users.
In some example embodiments, the listening environment may include a VR model or a real AR space of a user. The AR implementations (for example, for different use cases) may be processed as an extension of VR use case, in which a capture device in AR consumption may obtain (at a minimum) a base model of the real room acoustics and after that utilize the similar steps as for the VR use case.
The effect of the listening environment for the percept may be based on the accuracy of particular implementation. For example, a simple example implementation may consider the direct sound and a single reflection only, or a direct sound with a reverberation effect derived based on the model. A complex example implementation, on the other hand, may consider a high number of reflections or the real room impulse response (RIR).
Thus, the (default) rendering of the audio is available for the spatial audio rendering system 630. In a more advanced system, any effects of the spatial audio environment are similarly available for the renderer.
The system (at block 840) may detect interaction at listening position by comparing audio rendering level against corresponding level threshold metadata. For example, the system may compare the sound pressure of the audio rendering (in some example embodiments, including the spatial audio environment effects) against the at least one threshold after having defined and made available metadata related to at least one sound pressure threshold. This allows for detection of the audio interactions and also the control of their extent.
At block 850, the system may apply the modification to the audio according to the audio interaction detection results.
At block 860, the audio may be rendered at the listening position and presented to the user. At least at this step, the rotation of the user's head may also be considered in order to correctly present the spatial audio directions.
Without in any way limiting the scope, interpretation, or application of the claims appearing below, a technical effect of one or more of the example embodiments disclosed herein is that the system enables intuitive audio-object interactions that may automatically take room acoustic properties into account to provide improved realism and immersion. Another advantage of the system is that, when particular conditions are fulfilled, the system may use modification parameters, such as location, scale, rotation, amplification, equalization, directiveness (for example, the direction in which the sound propagates), and time shift. In addition, further modification parameters, such as spatial extent and reverb may be used.
It is furthermore noted that in some example implementations, both the volume-based (for example as implemented by level based audio object rendering system 140) and the distance-based aspects may be considered together. For example, a specific content may support only one of these methods. A renderer implementation may then utilize the set of processes that enables the intended experience for the user given the available metadata. In another example embodiment, a content creator may provide instructions to differentiate between a first set of audio-object interactions that depend on the spatial audio environment and a second set that do not. This may be achieved via use of a dedicated metadata flag.
The example embodiments may provide tools that allow a content creator to define their content's rendering as well as possible (for example, with greater correspondence to a physical audio environment). Taking into account the effects of the spatial audio environment enables this. Additionally, a metadata flag may allow for switching between the two modes of operation for each audio-object (and, in some instances, the flag may be time-varying), which greatly enhances the content creator's creative choices. This increases the accuracy of representations as one of the key differentiators of 6DoF AR/VR is the user's ability to roam the scene and both have the scene react to the user and allow the user to directly interact with various objects.
In accordance with an example, a method may include obtaining a listening position associated with a user; obtaining audio and metadata corresponding to a rendering at the listening position; obtaining a listening environment and determining an effect of the listening environment on the rendering at the listening position; detecting audio interaction at the listening position by comparing an audio rendering level against a corresponding level threshold metadata; applying, by a processing device, an audio modification according to the audio interaction detection; and rendering audio at the listening position based on the applied audio modification.
In accordance with another example, wherein detecting the audio interaction at the listening position by comparing the audio rendering level against the corresponding level threshold metadata further comprises: determining whether the audio at the listening position was previously under interaction; in response to a determination that the audio at the listening position was previously under interaction, comparing the audio at the listening position to an active threshold; and in response to a determination that the audio is over the active threshold, applying an audio interaction adjustment and sending modification information to an audio object spatial rendering engine.
In accordance with another example, in response to a determination that the audio is under the active threshold, phasing out the audio interaction and sending corresponding information to the audio object spatial rendering engine.
In accordance with another example, providing a specific effect to notify a user than an audio object interaction has ended.
In accordance with another example, wherein detecting the audio interaction at the listening position by comparing the audio rendering level against the corresponding level threshold metadata further comprises: determining whether the audio at the listening position was previously under interaction; in response to a determination that the audio at the listening position was not previously under interaction, comparing the audio at the listening position to a trigger threshold; and in response to a determination that the audio is over the trigger threshold, applying an audio interaction adjustment and sending modification information to an audio object spatial rendering engine.
In accordance with another example, in response to a determination that the audio is under the trigger threshold, sending default information to the audio object spatial rendering engine.
In accordance with another example, wherein the audio rendering level comprises at least one of a sound pressure level and a volume level.
In accordance with another example, wherein detecting the audio interaction at the listening position by comparing the audio rendering level against the corresponding level threshold metadata further comprises: comparing separately a direct sound and a reflected sound; and ignoring a reverb effect if the reverb effect is detected.
In accordance with another example, substituting a secondary effect for the reverb effect.
In accordance with another example, checking a metadata flag to determine whether to apply the audio modification.
In accordance with another example, wherein the audio and the metadata further comprises: one or more of at least one track, at least one channel, and a set of directional sub-band components.
In accordance with another example, an example apparatus may comprise at least one processor; and at least one non-transitory memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to: obtain a listening position associated with a user; obtain audio and metadata corresponding to a rendering at the listening position; obtain a listening environment and determine an effect of the listening environment on the rendering at the listening position; detect audio interaction at the listening position by comparing an audio rendering level against a corresponding level threshold metadata; apply an audio modification according to the audio interaction detection; and render audio at the listening position based on the applied audio modification.
In accordance with another example, an example apparatus may comprise a non-transitory program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine for performing operations, the operations comprising: obtaining a listening position associated with a user; obtaining audio and metadata corresponding to a rendering at the listening position; obtaining a listening environment and determining an effect of the listening environment on the rendering at the listening position; detecting audio interaction at the listening position by comparing an audio rendering level against a corresponding level threshold metadata; applying an audio modification according to the audio interaction detection; and rendering audio at the listening position based on the applied audio modification.
In accordance with another example, an example apparatus comprises: means for obtaining a listening position associated with a user; means for obtaining audio and metadata corresponding to a rendering at the listening position; obtaining a listening environment and determining an effect of the listening environment on the rendering at the listening position; means for detecting audio interaction at the listening position by comparing an audio rendering level against a corresponding level threshold metadata; means for applying an audio modification according to the audio interaction detection; and means for rendering audio at the listening position based on the applied audio modification.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized as the memory. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a non-transitory computer readable storage medium. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium does not include propagating signals and may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
It should be understood that the foregoing description is only illustrative. Various alternatives and modifications can be devised by those skilled in the art. For example, features recited in the various dependent claims could be combined with each other in any suitable combination(s). In addition, features from different embodiments described above could be selectively combined into a new embodiment. Accordingly, the description is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances which fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5450494 | Okubo | Sep 1995 | A |
5633993 | Redmann | May 1997 | A |
5754939 | Herz | May 1998 | A |
6151020 | Palmer | Nov 2000 | A |
6330486 | Padula | Dec 2001 | B1 |
7099482 | Jot et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7266207 | Wilcock et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7492915 | Jahnke | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7840668 | Sylvain | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8187093 | Hideya et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8189813 | Muraoka et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8411880 | Wang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8509454 | Kirkeby et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8831255 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8990078 | Nakadai et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9161147 | Korn | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9179232 | Jarske et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197979 | Lemieux et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9215539 | Kim et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9271081 | Corteel et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20020150254 | Wilcock et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150257 | Wilcock et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060025216 | Smith | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20080123864 | Reichelt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080144864 | Huon | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080247567 | Kjolerbakken et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090016540 | Heningsen Nielsen | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090138805 | Hildreth | May 2009 | A1 |
20090240359 | Hyndman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253512 | Nickell | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262946 | Dunko | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286600 | Hideya | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100098274 | Hannemann et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100119072 | Ojanpera | May 2010 | A1 |
20100169796 | Lynk | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208905 | Franck et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110002469 | Ojala | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110129095 | Avendano et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166681 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120027217 | Jun et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120093320 | Flaks et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120230512 | Ojanpera | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232910 | Dressler et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120295637 | Hannuksela | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130114819 | Melchior et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130259243 | Herre et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321396 | Kirk | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321586 | Kirk et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140010391 | Ek et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140133661 | Harma et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140153753 | Crockett | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140285312 | Laaksonen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140328505 | Heinemann | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350944 | Jot et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361976 | Osman | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150002388 | Weston et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150003616 | Middlemiss et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150055937 | Van Hoff et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150063610 | Mossner | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078594 | McGrath et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150116316 | Fitzgerald et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150146873 | Chabanne et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150223002 | Mehta et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245153 | Malak | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150263692 | Bush | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150302651 | Shpigelman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150316640 | Jarske et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150362733 | Spivack | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160050508 | Redmann | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160084937 | Lin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160112819 | Mehnert et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125867 | Jarvinen et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160142830 | Hu | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150267 | Strong | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150343 | Wang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150345 | Jang | May 2016 | A1 |
20160182944 | Han | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160192105 | Breebaart et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160212272 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160227337 | Goodwin et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160227338 | Oh et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160266865 | Tsingos | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160300577 | Fersch et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160313790 | Clement et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170077887 | You | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170110155 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170150252 | Trestain et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170165575 | Ridihalgh et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170169613 | VanBlon et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170208415 | Ojala | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170223478 | Jot et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170230760 | Sanger et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170289486 | Stroffolino | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170295446 | Thagadur Shivappa | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170366914 | Stein et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20190329129 | Fajt et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1857027 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101999067 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102668374 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102855133 | Jan 2013 | CN |
103702072 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104010265 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104041081 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104737557 | Jun 2015 | CN |
105611481 | May 2016 | CN |
2 030 660 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2688318 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2540175 | Jan 2017 | GB |
WO-2009092060 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009128859 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2010020788 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2011020067 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011020065 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2013064943 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013155217 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2014130221 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO-2014168901 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2015152661 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO-2016014254 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO-2017120681 | Jul 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alessandro Pieropan, Giampiero Salvi, Karl Pauwels, Hedvig Kjellstrom Audio-Visual Classification and Detection of Human Manipulation Actions [https://www.csc.kth.se/˜hedvig/publications/iros_14.pdf] retrieved Sep. 29, 2017. |
Micah T. Taylor, Anish Chandak, Lakulish Antani, Dinesh Manocha, RESound: Interactive Sound Rendering for Dynamic Virtual Enviroments MM'09, Oct. 19-24, 2009, Beijing, China. http://gamma.cs.unc.edu/Sound/RESound/. |
Hatala, Marek et al., “Ontology-Based User Modeling in an Augmented Audio Reality System for Museums”, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.91.5712&rep=repl&type=pdf; Aug. 29, 2016, 38 pgs. |
Gunel, Banu et al., “Spatial Synchronization of Audiovisual Objects by 3D Audio Object Coding”, IEEE 2010, pp. 460-465; https://www.researchgate.net/profile/E_Ekmekcioglu/publication/251975482_Spatial_synchronization_of_audiovisual_objects_by_3D_audio_object_coding/links/54e783660cf2f7aa4d4d858a.pdf>; 2010. |
Cameron Faulkner, “Google's Adding Immersive Audio to your Virtual Reality Worlds” http://www.in.techradar.com/news/misc/googlesaddingimmersiveaudiotoyourvrworlds/articleshow/57191578.cms retrieved Feb. 16, 2017. |
Simon Galvez, Marcos F.; Menzies, Dylan; Fazi, Filippo Maria; de Campos, Teofilo; Hilton, Adrian “A Listener Position Adaptive Stereo System for Object-Based Reproduction” http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfin?elib=17670 dated May 6, 2015. |
Anil Camci, Paul Murray, Angus Graeme Forbes, “A Web-based UI for Designing 3D Sound Objects and Virtual Sonic Enviroments” Electronic Visualization Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago retrieved May 16, 2017. |
Henney Oh “The Future of VR Audio-3 Trends to Track This Year” dated Jul. 4, 2017. |
Carl Schissler, Aaron Nicholls, and Ravish Mehra “Efficient HRTF-Based Spatial Audio for Area and Volumetric Sources” [retrieved Jan. 31, 2018]. |
Hasan Khaddour, Jiri Schimmel, Frantisek Rund “A Novel Combined System of Direction Estimation and Sound Zooming of Multiple Speakers” Radioengineering, vol. 24, No. 2, Jun. 2015. |
“Unity 3D Audio”; Nov. 8, 2011; whole document (9 pages). |
Wozniewski, M. et al.; “User-Specific Audio Rendering and Steerable Sound for Distributed Virtual Environments”; Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Auditory Display; Montréal, Canada; Jun. 26-29, 2007; whole document (4 pages). |
Galvez, Marcos F. Simon; Menzies, Dylan; Mason, Rusell; Fazi, Filippo Maria “Object-Based Audio Reproduction Using a Listener-Position Adaptive Stereo System” University of Southampton http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=18516 [Full Text downloaded Sep. 12, 2018]. |
Li, Loco Radio Designing High Density Augmented Reality Audio Browsers, PhD Thesis Final, MIT, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190104375 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |