There are numerous level sensor devices available for detecting the fluid level in a tank. Some of these devices, function to indicate when a certain level or operating “point’ has been reached by the fluid in the tank. Other sensors allow for continual measurement of the fluid level within the tank. In addition, fluid level sensors can be classified as either contact or non-contact sensors. There are a variety of non-contact sensor technologies including ultrasonic, external capacitive, laser (TOF), and others. Contact type sensors include float systems, conductive probes, and in-contact capacitive sensors. Another commonly used type of level sensor technology is based on measuring the hydrostatic pressure of a liquid and then converting this pressure measurement to a depth or level measurement using a mathematical algorithm tailored to the liquid be monitored. Pressure sensors used in this system can be submerged and in contact with the liquid or be used remotely and isolated from the liquid. It is this latter type that the invention described herein improves upon and addresses some issues not previously dealt with. There are several issues that prevent the use of hydrostatic pressure sensors for level monitoring in many applications. First there is the calibration of these sensors often use an empty container as a reference point (to establish offset compensation for manufacturing variances). In some applications calibration is needed or desired when the vessel contains a liquid and it is not convenient or possible to empty it. Second, In some applications it is desirable to monitor the level of a liquid “below” a high reference point and for these applications an alternate method of calibration is needed. Third, in many applications traditional methods of using pressure to indicate level requires manual calibration and/or procedures to account for natural variations in resolution and accuracy caused by manufacturing variances. Fourth, in critical applications a method is needed to monitor the performance of the sensor and detect failures.
Ultimately the device combines a pressure transducer and conductive probes that work together to provide a simple way to calibrate the level sensor without having to start with an empty tank or empty a tank of its contents in order to establish a baseline. The conductive components both act as calibration references and “fail-safe” high point alarms in the event of pressure transducer malfunction.
The sensor works in combination with a microprocessor to process the pressure data and convert it to a water level based on hydrostatic principles. The microcontroller also monitors conductive probes to complete automatic calibration and re-calibration when necessary. The sensor system can use AI functionality (now available with new microcontroller chipsets) to “learn” the normal behavior of a system requiring level control and recognize abnormal behavior as a fault that may indicate sensor or system failure.
This invention combines a conductive level sensor with a pressure sensor to allow for calibration to occur at fixed level above empty. The invention allows for re-calibration to occur without requiring a container to be placed in an empty state.
Because the calibration point is shifted to a “high” level, this invention can be used to accurately determine levels below the calibration point which can then be used for process control. In applications where the absolute level is not critical, this method can provide an advantage by reducing the production tolerances required in terms of matching the sensor to the container. This invention uses auto-calibration and can automatically compensate for any inaccuracies in the pressure sensor or variation due to manufacturing tolerances. This invention uses a microprocessor to convert the pressure data to liquid level data based on hydrostatic principles. In addition, this system can incorporate AI (artificial intelligence) and/or ANN (artificial neural network) techniques to allow for the invention to adapt to or “learn” the normal behavior of a process as regards liquid level fluctuations and detect anomalies that indicate a sensor failure.
Additional conductive probes can be added to allow for critical level detection in the event of pressure sensor failure. These provide “fail-safe” redundancy. The system contains the following key items: first, a high-resolution low range pressure transducer, second a communication interface connecting the transducer to a microprocessor. Third, an isolation sample channel utilizing a gas column (air) to isolate a liquid from the pressure transducer. Fourth a corrosion resistant conductive probes integral with the isolation column. Fifth, AI (artificial intelligence) and/or ANN (artificial neural network) to monitor normal system operation and determine sensor failure.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings which disclose at least one embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood, however, that the drawings are designed for the purpose of illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.
In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views:
Referring to the drawings,
In step S7 the system such as microprocessor 50 can use AI (artificial intelligence) or ANN to analyze pressure patterns and to predict sensor failure. If in step S9 the system determines that the sensor is ok then the process proceeds to step S13 to monitor the liquid level. Next, in step S14 the system is action dependent on pre-programmed offset values for critical process points.
Alternatively, after step S6, the system can monitor the re-calibration cycle counter. Next, in step S11 the system can determine if there is a recalibration cycle limit. If there is no cycle limit then the system proceeds back to step S8. Alternatively, if the calibration limit is hit in step S11, the system proceeds to step S12 wherein a calibration flag is set to Off. If the calibration flag is set to off then the process can proceed to step S2 wherein it can monitor the calibration probe.
In addition, in the alternative to step S9, if the system determines that the sensor is not OK, then the process proceeds to step S10 wherein there is a sensor failure and the alarm becomes active.
In at least one embodiment a change in the liquid level causes a proportional change in the isolated air column 12. The connected microprocessor uses the pressure sensed by the transducer such as transducer 27 to calculate the liquid level column height of the container. The microprocessor uses a signal from the calibration probe 16 to establish a calibration point for the start level. The controller or microprocessor is pre-programmed with off-set values for important process levels referenced to this calibration point. In at least one embodiment, the three different sensors 14, 16 and 18 each of different length are configured to measure a fluid or water height inside of a container as well as the transducer 27. In at least one embodiment, the sensors 14, 16 and 18 are formed as contact sensors, such that when the water or fluid contacts these sensors it indicates a level of the water based upon the position of the tip of each sensor. Simultaneously and/or alternatively, the transducer 27 also measures the height of the water in a container based upon the pressure read by the transducer (see above). For example, the input of fluid or water into a container can be triggered by a reading of the pressure levels of transducer 27 or by the water falling below sensor 18, thereby prompting an indication to increase the level of water in the system. Alternatively, when the pressure levels on transducer 27 reach a different level such as when the fluid levels are high and when the fluid reaches a lower tip of sensor 16, the water or fluid input into the system can shut down. Thus, the sensors 14, 16 and 18 can be used in parallel with transducer 27 to calibrate transducer 27 to provide more accurate readings.
Accordingly, while at least one embodiment of the present invention have been shown and described, it is to be understood that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application is a non-provisional application that claims priority to U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 63/215,656 filed on Jun. 28, 2021 the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1102377 | Wilton | Jul 1914 | A |
2638644 | Rauhut | May 1953 | A |
4689302 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4746336 | Mignot | May 1988 | A |
5589132 | Zippel | Dec 1996 | A |
5656242 | Morrow et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5756899 | Ugai et al. | May 1998 | A |
6053968 | Miller | Apr 2000 | A |
6500244 | Sanchez | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6589489 | Morrow et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6810732 | Shon | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6916630 | Sofer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7147692 | Fornai et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7665358 | Calabrese | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7722708 | Powell, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8083837 | Mazzanti et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8357359 | Woo et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8444922 | Kusuura | May 2013 | B2 |
8748167 | Greene et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9044700 | Gruenbacher et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9327223 | Gruenbacher et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9573088 | Gruenbacher et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9579597 | Gruenbacher et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20040184949 | McEllen | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060097411 | Kim | May 2006 | A1 |
20060169141 | Yuen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070122320 | Pletcher et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080156015 | Meyerholtz et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080271527 | Hewitt | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100047117 | Bernard | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100154534 | Hampton | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110150814 | Woo et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110303093 | Jeung | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110318817 | Greene et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120167660 | Calcote | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183488 | Woo et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120183489 | Woo et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130085204 | Hollingshead et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140208781 | Broadbent | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150266031 | Mills et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170122600 | Son et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20190203960 | Hoyda et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200064175 | Krammer | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200179873 | Hoyda et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20220397440 | Broadbent | Dec 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2016 120 534 | Nov 2017 | DE |
0 328 782 | Aug 1989 | EP |
9407122 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO-2014162006 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2021190749 | Sep 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report in PCT/US22/35385 dated Oct. 5, 2022. |
Written Opinion in PCT/US22/35385 dated Oct. 5, 2022. |
International Search Report in PCT/US23/17771 dated Jun. 21, 2023. |
Written Opinion of the Interntional Searching Authority in PCT/US23/17771 dated Jun. 21, 2023. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/US23/17771 dated Jun. 21, 2023. |
Notice of Allowance in Chinese Application No. 201880089590.6 dated Oct. 21, 2022. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability with Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority of PCT/US2018/067402, dated Jul. 2, 2020. |
International Search Report in PCT/US2018/067402, dated Mar. 28, 2019. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2018/067402, dated Mar. 28, 2019. |
International Search Report in PCT/US2021/018133 dated Jun. 15, 2021. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/US2021/018133 dated Jun. 15, 2021. |
First Chinese Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201880089590.6 dated Oct. 27, 2021. |
Second Chinese Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201880089590.6 dated Jun. 29, 2022. |
Extended European Search Report in European Application No. 18892900.4 dated Oct. 8, 2021. |
First Indian Examination Report in Indian Application No. 202027030194 dated Apr. 7, 2022. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability with Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority of PCT/US2021/018133 dated Aug. 11, 2022. |
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/181,604 dated Aug. 31, 2023. |
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,396 dated Oct. 30, 2019. |
U.S. Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,396 dated Apr. 20, 2020. |
U.S. Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,396 dated May 18, 2020. |
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,396 dated Jun. 26, 2020. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,396 dated Oct. 16, 2020. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,396 dated Nov. 23, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220412790 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63215656 | Jun 2021 | US |