The present application claims the benefit of and priority to a pending provisional application entitled “Asynchronous Common Mode Noise Immune Galvanic Isolated Signal Level Shifting,” Ser. No. 61/675,932 filed on Jul. 26, 2012. The disclosure in this pending provisional application is hereby incorporated fully by reference into the present application.
Level shifters can be utilized to level shift a signal between circuits that are referenced to different grounds. One or more isolation barriers can provide galvanic isolation between the circuits. Exemplary approaches to galvanic isolation can be based on capacitance, induction, electromagnetic waves, optical, acoustic, and mechanical means to exchange energy between the circuits. In some applications, the level shifter may be in a power system or another noisy environment. For example, the signal may correspond to a control signal for a power switch of a switch mode power supply. In such systems, noise can interfere with the accuracy of the level shifter resulting in distortion. Distortion may not be tolerable in certain applications, such as audio systems where the distortion can increase total harmonic distortion resulting in reduced sound quality.
A level shifter having feedback signal from a high voltage circuit, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, and as set forth more completely in the claims.
The following description contains specific information pertaining to implementations in the present disclosure. The drawings in the present application and their accompanying detailed description are directed to merely exemplary implementations. Unless noted otherwise, like or corresponding elements among the figures may be indicated by like or corresponding reference numerals. Moreover, the drawings and illustrations in the present application are generally not to scale, and are not intended to correspond to actual relative dimensions.
Level shifter 102 is configured to level shift input signal HI to output signal HO. Output signal HO is referenced to a different ground than input signal HI, such that output signal HO is suitable for driving power switch Q1. As shown in
In system 100, input signal HI and output voltage Vo can be, for example, thousands of volts apart. As such, level shifter 102 can be at substantial risk for exposure to noise, which can interfere with the accuracy of level shifter 102. For example, high voltage switching in power supply 104 can introduce common mode noise in level shifter 102. Certain common mode noise in system 100 can be synchronous common mode noise that coincides with input signal HI switching power switch Q1 (or multiple power switches and/or multiple input signals in other power supply topologies). However, other common mode noise in system 100 can be asynchronous common mode noise that does not necessarily coincide with input signal HI switching power switch Q1.
By way of more specific example, asynchronous common mode noise in system 100 may occur in zero voltage switching during OFF time of power switch Q1. During this time, an LC tank formed by capacitor C and inductor L can resonate, and reactivate power switch Q1 causing asynchronous common mode noise. As another example, power supply 104 may include a half-bridge for switching power (e.g. comprising microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) switches) in, for example, a plasma display panel (PDP). In this example, asynchronous common mode noise may result from switching of auxiliary switches that are coupled to the half-bridge.
It should be noted that system 100 includes power supply 104 as an example, which may instead correspond to another circuit receiving output signal HO. Thus, power supply 104 could instead be a circuit that is not a power supply and may more generally correspond to a circuit conducive to causing common mode noise in level shifter 102.
Common mode noise in system 100 can interfere with the ability of level shifter 102 to accurately level shift input signal HI to output signal HO resulting in distortion in output signal HO. The distortion can cause misfire of power switch Q1 or other circuitry being controlled utilizing output signal HO. As such, common mode noise in system 100, and especially asynchronous common mode noise, can cause disruption, loss of functionality, and damage to system 100.
Referring now to
Low voltage circuit 106 includes differential signal generator 112, bias circuit 114, refresh logic 116, and feedback detector 118. High voltage circuit 108 includes bias circuit 120, feedback generator 122, and regenerate logic 124. Isolation barrier 110a includes at least capacitor C1, isolation barrier 110b includes at least capacitor C2, and isolation barrier 110c includes at least capacitor C3.
In level shifter 102, low voltage circuit 106 is coupled to power P1 and is referenced to ground G1. High voltage circuit 108 is coupled to power P2 and is referenced to ground G2, which can be a floating ground. Low voltage circuit 106 is configured to provide differential signal 130 to high voltage circuit 108. As shown in
High voltage circuit 108 is configured to receive differential signal 130 from low voltage circuit 106 so as to level shift differential signal 130 from ground G1 of low voltage circuit 106 to ground G2 of high voltage circuit 108. As shown in
In the present implementation, differential signal 130 is provided by low voltage circuit 106 responsive to feedback signal FB from high voltage circuit 108. As such, in some implementations, low voltage circuit 106 can adjust complementary signals A and B based on feedback signal FB. In
In the present implementation, feedback signal FB is provided by high voltage circuit 108 through isolation barrier 110c, which is a dedicated isolation barrier. In other implementations, feedback signal FB is provided by high voltage circuit 108 through at least one shared isolation harrier that is also utilized for other signals. For example, feedback signal FB and differential signal 130 can be communicated through at least one shared isolation barrier. More particularly, feedback signal FB can be provided by high voltage circuit 108 through at least one of isolation barriers 110a and 110b, which are also utilized for complementary signals A and B respectively. In these implementations isolation barrier 110c may not be necessary. Rather, level shifter 102 can employ any of various bidirectional transmission techniques.
Referring to
In
In
In
In some implementations, isolation barriers 210a and 210b are at least partially on isolation barrier IC 239. Isolation barriers 210a and 210b can be completely on isolation barrier IC 239, as shown in
Alternatively, isolation barriers 210a and 210b can be completely on either of low and high voltage ICs 236 and 238. For example, in
Referring again to
Absent asynchronous common mode noise ADV/Dt, each edge of input signal HI is manifested as input signal spikes in complimentary signals AO and BO. As shown in
In high voltage circuit 108, regenerate logic 124 is configured to generate output signal HO where edges of output signal HO correspond substantially to the input signal spikes in waveforms 340b and 340c. As such, waveform 340j includes falling edge 346a corresponding to downward input signal spike 344a in waveform 340b and rising edge 346b corresponding to upward input signal spike 344b in waveform 340b. In doing so, output signal HO accurately corresponds to a level shifted version input signal HI while low and high voltage circuits 106 and 108 are galvanically isolated.
In level shifter 102, asynchronous common mode noise ADV/Dt and common mode noise in general is manifested as noise spikes having a common polarity in waveforms 340b, 340c, 340d, and 340e due to being each referenced to ground G2. For example,
The aforementioned scheme of common mode noise detection may be suitable in many instances where common mode noise spikes in level shifter 102 are caused by synchronous common mode noise. However, in
In level shifter 102, distortion in output signal HO can cause disruption, loss of functionality, and damage to system 100. Low voltage circuit 106 is configured to refresh differential signal 130 responsive to feedback signal FB. By refreshing differential signal 130, distortion 352 in waveform 340j is significantly reduced.
In level shifter 102, feedback signal FB is provided by feedback generator 122 of high voltage circuit 108 concurrently with common mode noise in level shifter 102. As shown in
Thus, in level shifter 102, feedback signal FB is provided by high voltage circuit 108 through isolation barrier 110c. As such, low voltage circuit 106 can provide differential signal 130 responsive to feedback signal FB from high voltage circuit 108 while being galvanically isolated therefrom. This can enable more accurate and robust level shifting of input signal HI. The present application emphasizes implementations where feedback signal FB indicates common mode noise in level shifter 102. However, feedback signal FB can indicate other conditions in system 100. As examples, feedback signal FB may indicate over current, over temperate, and/or over voltage conditions of high voltage circuit 108 and/or power supply 104. Furthermore, feedback signal FB may be based on signals provided to high voltage circuit 108 other than differential signal 130 (e.g. signals from power supply 104). Furthermore, in the present implementation, feedback signal FB is provided by high voltage circuit 108 through a capacitive isolation barrier (isolation barrier 110c). However, isolation barrier 110c need not be a capacitive isolation barrier. Exemplary approaches to galvanic isolation for level shifter 102 can be based on any combination of capacitance, induction, electromagnetic waves, and optical, acoustic, and mechanical means to exchange energy between low voltage circuit 106 and high voltage circuit 108.
From the above description it is manifest that various techniques can be used for implementing the concepts described in the present application without departing from the scope of those concepts. Moreover, while the concepts have been described with specific reference to certain implementations, a person of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that changes can be made in form and detail without departing from the scope of those concepts. As such, the described implementations are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. It should also be understood that the present application is not limited to the particular implementations described above, but many rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions are possible without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7031458 | Holcombe et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7515672 | Dupuis et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8024623 | Ho | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8228976 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8373486 | Ficke | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8571093 | Van de Beek | Oct 2013 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140028371 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61675932 | Jul 2012 | US |