The disclosure relates to a leveling device for a stacking tray. The leveling device compensates for end-to-end thickness variations in certain stacked objects, such as specialty recording media, and reduces any valley in the stack.
In both home office and in commercial office equipment including copiers, printers or xerographic machines, stackable media, such as paper sheets, are fed using a sheet feeding mechanism from an input storage tray onto an output tray. Frequently, the paper sheets are stored on an elevator type of sheet feeding tray that adjusts to accommodate a variable number of sheets.
Tray lift 106 lifts the stack of recording media 104 upwards so that a feeder 110, such as belt assembly 112, may separate a top recording medium from the stack and feed the top recording medium into print engine 108 for processing.
Although interface requirements between the top recording medium and belt assembly 112 may vary depending on different types of feeding mechanisms, it is usually a requirement that the top surface of the top recording medium is substantially parallel to (or flat relative to) a bottom surface of belt assembly 112. This provides sufficient contact between belt assembly 112 and the top surface of the top recording medium to achieve proper feeding. In addition, a leading edge of the top recording medium usually must be aligned with an input port of the print engine 108 to achieve successful feeds. This is readily achieved when feeding flat recording media. However, when recording media 104 is thicker at one end than at other portions, the top surface of the top recording medium of a stack of such recording media may have one end that is substantially closer to belt assembly 112 than its remaining portion due to the accumulated thicknesses of the complete stack of recording media. This may result in jams, misfeeds or other problems.
Thus, feed tray 102 shown in
Frequently, specialized forms or media having such a non-uniform thickness are required for certain applications. Such specialized forms may include a paper sheet with labels or ID cards affixed thereto. One specific example of this includes DocuCards, available from Xerox Corporation. These are xerographically printable membership, identification or other cards provided on a sheet of paper. Each sheet has one or more of such ID cards mounted thereon. The cards, typically sized 3.375″×2.125″, are attached to one side of the sheet. An example of a DocuCard 118 is shown in
Because of the addition of the card(s), such sheet media have a non-uniform thickness. Thus, when stacked as shown in
One attempt to solve this problem was the Tiltatron, a specialized modular tray insert made by Xerox that was insertable into a conventional printing machine stacking tray. The Tiltatron has a pivoting leveling tray that pivotally supports the thicker end of the stack. An example of this can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,087 to Schieck et al., assigned to Xerox Corporation.
A Tiltatron-type pivoting device is shown in
In accordance with various aspects, a leveling device within a stack tray is provided to support such non-uniform media that not only levels the ends of the media stack, but also reduces and preferably minimizes the valley formed near the center of the paper stack to improve sheet acquisition and provide a flatter top media surface.
Using such a leveling tray, stackable media having non-uniform thicknesses may be stacked in larger quantities, such as about 600 sheets or more, while maintaining a desirable position for proper feeding or stacking.
In accordance with various aspects, a valley removal mechanism provides a variable height support surface that lifts intermediate portions of the stack to offset the valley in proportion to the height of the stack.
In accordance with various aspects, a leveling device for a stacking tray compensates for end-to-end thickness variations in a stack of non-uniform thickness media and reduces a valley in the stack, includes a pivoting stack tray and a valley removal mechanism. The pivoting stack tray receives a stack of non-uniform thickness media thereon, one end of the tray receiving a thicker end of the stack being pivoted relative to an opposite end thereof between full tray and empty tray positions to provide level top ends of the stack. The valley removal mechanism is mounted to the pivoting tray. The valley removal mechanism includes: a media support surface positioned above the pivoting tray intermediate ends of the pivoting tray and below the stack, the media support surface supporting at least a portion of an intermediate section of the stack and being pivotally movable relative to the pivoting stack tray; a ramp surface having a predefined profile; and at least one lever arm operably connected between the media support surface and at least one ramp follower to move the media support surface relative to the pivoting tray in accordance with the ramp surface profile and in proportion to the height of the stack to offset a valley formed intermediate ends of the stack and provide a top media in the stack with a substantially flat top surface profile.
In accordance with various aspects, a feeder assembly for feeding a stack of non-uniform thickness media is provided. The feeder assembly includes a pivoting stack tray, a valley removal mechanism, and a feeder. The pivoting stack tray receives a stack of non-uniform thickness media thereon, one end of the tray receiving a thicker end of the stack being pivoted relative to an opposite end thereof between full tray and empty tray positions to provide level top ends of the stack. The valley removal mechanism is mounted to the pivoting tray and includes: a media support surface positioned above the pivoting tray intermediate ends of the pivoting tray and below the stack, the media support surface supporting at least a portion of an intermediate section of the stack and being pivotally movable relative to the pivoting stack tray; a ramp surface having a predefined profile; and at least one lever arm operably connected between the media support surface and at least one ramp follower to move the media support surface relative to the pivoting tray in accordance with the ramp surface profile and in proportion to the height of the stack to offset a valley formed intermediate ends of the stack and provide a top media in the stack with a substantially flat top surface profile. The feeder is positioned directly above the top media in the stack, the feeder having a media contact surface. The combination of the pivoting stack tray and valley removal mechanism position a top media in the stack substantially parallel with the media contact surface of the feeder at all travel positions of the pivoting stack tray between the full tray and empty tray positions.
Various disclosed exemplary embodiments of the systems and methods will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures, wherein:
As discussed above, many types of machines process objects that are stacked in one or more stack trays, and each object of the stack may be input into the processing machine from a first stack tray, processed and output to another stack tray. For ease of discussion, an office device 250, such as a xerographic copier, printer, or digital press, is used as an example to illustrate various features related to a feeder stack tray having a leveling device that removes a valley from the stack.
An exemplary stack tray 300 is shown in
Additional details of an exemplary stack tray 300 and valley removal mechanism 400 will be described with respect to
Stack tray 300 includes a pivoting tray 302 that may be a permanent fixture of the stack tray or may be a removable insert used only for support of non-uniform thickness media. In the latter case, pivoting tray may be non-powered and acted upon by a conventional horizontal elevator tray lift 306 that may be guided by a lift guide 314, which may also serve as a paper guide.
A stack of non-uniform media, such as DocuCards of up to about 600 sheets or more, may be stacked on top of pivoting tray 302, with the thick end 140 of the stack oriented towards the far lower end of the tray. Rising of tray lift 306 causes a lifting of the far end of pivoting tray 302. As the pivoting tray 302 is urged upwards between full and empty tray positions, the ends 130, 140 of the media stack are moved upward so that top ends of the stack remain level. However, because of the large capacity, a valley forms intermediate media ends 130, 140. This valley is compensated for by a valley removal mechanism 400 discussed below.
Valley removal mechanism 400 is provided within feed stacking tray 300 and assists in variably supporting a central part of the sheet stack to remove the valley. Valley removal mechanism 400 includes a sheet media support surface 410, at least one lever arm 420, a ramp member 440, a ramp follower 435, and an optional adjustment mechanism 430. As better shown in
Cross bar 410 functions to independently raise intermediate portions of the stack in proportion to the valley to offset, remove or substantially limit the valley. That is, the valley 150 in
Valley removal mechanism 400 is positioned within feed tray 300 so that sheet media support surface 410 may extend above pivoting tray 302 intermediate ends of pivoting tray 302. This may be achieved, for example, by positioning sheet media support surface 410 above the pivoting tray 302 and extending lever arm(s) 420 through corresponding slots 312 in pivoting tray 302 (
In its most simple form considering a purely pivotal tray 200, the ramp profile of ramp 440 can be substantially flat and may consist of the vertical tray guide surface 314. However, in the specific example illustrated, pivoting tray 302 has a movement profile that includes both pivotal and translatory movements. That is, when traveling from the full stack position in
In the example shown, ramp follower 435 initially is on a substantially vertical surface of paper guide 314 at the full tray position of
In will become apparent that the specific profile of ramp 440 will be dependent on various control parameters, including the particular movement profile of the pivoting tray 302, the size, location and non-uniformity of media 118 on the tray, the desired media capacity in the tray, and other possible variables. A suitable profile may be determined empirically or through experimental trial and error testing.
In a specific example, feed tray 300 is designed to handle at least 600 sheets of DocuCards or similar non-uniformed thickness media. At such capacities, this media would normally exhibit a very large valley 150 as shown in
Preferably, the support surface extends across a majority of the media width as shown in
Valley removal mechanism 400 may be separable from tray 302 or may be an integral part of feeder 300. Also, while an illustrated embodiment is directed to a feeder stack tray, similar advantages may be achieved by an output tray having a valley removal mechanism to similarly remove the valley from a stack of non-uniform thickness media and provide a substantially flat top media surface.
While the above examples relate to objects such as DocuCards, the stack tray and valley removal mechanism may be used to support other objects having non-uniform thickness across a surface thereof. For example, transparencies may have a tab on one edge that is of a different thickness than other portions of the transparency. Thus, when transparencies are stacked in a tray, one edge of the transparency stacks higher than the opposing edge causing possible feed difficulties.
While an exemplary embodiment orients the stack so that feeder 110 feeds the recording media in a direction parallel to the pivot axis of pivoting tray 302 (into the paper as illustrated), because the resultant top media sheet is supported so as to be substantially flat, feeder 110 can feed in other directions.
It would appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also, that various presently unseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2886314 | Phelan | May 1959 | A |
3239219 | Reeves | Mar 1966 | A |
3659727 | Pearsall | May 1972 | A |
4188026 | Nagai | Feb 1980 | A |
4303152 | Widmaier | Dec 1981 | A |
4787325 | Black et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4942435 | Kneisel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5044622 | Cattin | Sep 1991 | A |
5302080 | Smith et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5332210 | Silverberg et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5364087 | Schieck et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5486911 | Rubscha et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5737987 | Olson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6142689 | Margiotta | Nov 2000 | A |
6213460 | Cahill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260842 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283469 | Weber | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6629693 | Siow et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648323 | Hsieh | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20060284366 | Van Dongen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070120318 | Moore | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070257419 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |