After having a stroke, a patient normally spends time in a hospital where he or she can be observed and provided with care until becoming healthy enough for discharge. During the hospital stay, the patient is typically moved from place-to-place within the hospital or to other health care facilities with a wheelchair that is pushed by hospital staff. While such movement is effective, it does not require any effort on the part of the patient. This is unfortunate as a patient's limbs, including the arms, are often weak after a stroke and requiring the patient to use the arms to propel the wheelchair could help restore the patient's arm strength and function.
Although conventional wheelchairs often have hoops mounted to the wheels that enable healthy individuals to drive the chair, stroke patients often lack the strength and/or range of motion to propel the wheelchair in this manner. While other manual drive mechanisms have been developed beyond wheel hoops, they also normally require strength or a range of motion that recent stroke victims do not possess.
In view of the above discussion, it can be appreciated that it would be desirable to have a wheelchair that can be more easily manually operated by a user sitting in the chair.
The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following figures. Matching reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.
As described above, it can be appreciated that it would be desirable to have a wheelchair that can be more easily manually operated by a user sitting in the chair. Disclosed herein are examples of such wheelchairs and their components. The wheelchairs comprise drive levers that can be moved forward and rearward by the user to manually propel the wheelchair. In some embodiments, forearm supports are mounted to the levers that help support the user's arms and therefore facilitate manipulation of the levers. In addition, tensioning mechanisms are associated with the levers that apply tension to the levers that opposes both forward and rearward movement of the levers. As is described below, such tension can assist the user in both driving and stopping the wheelchair.
In the following disclosure, various specific embodiments are described. It is to be understood that those embodiments are example implementations of the disclosed inventions and that alternative embodiments are possible. All such embodiments are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.
In the illustrated embodiment, the drive lever 16 comprises an elongated shaft 22, such as a hollow tube. The shaft 22 extends radially outward from the wheel 12 and its distal end terminates at a position well beyond the outer periphery of the wheel. Mounted to the distal end of the shaft 20 is a weight 24 that, as is described below, helps to both balance the lever 16 and facilitate harmonic resonance of the lever. Located at a position along the shaft 22 proximal of the weight 24 is a hand grip 26 that is adapted to be gripped by the wheelchair user. By way of example, the hand grip 26 is made of a resilient, non-slip material. Positioned adjacent to the hand grip 26 is a clutch actuation device, in the form of a clutch lever 28, which can be used to operate a clutch mechanism associated the wheel 12. Located at a position proximal of the hand grip 26, but still beyond of the periphery of the wheel 12, is a forearm support 30 that is adapted to support a forearm of the wheelchair user. In the illustrated embodiment, the support 30 includes a forearm trough 32 that is secured to the shaft 22 with a mounting bracket 34.
As indicated above, the drive lever 16 is attached to the transmission 18 so that the lever rotates along with the transmission. More particularly, the lever 16 is attached to a housing 36 of the transmission 18, which acts as a mounting member for the lever. Also attached to the transmission housing 36 is a counterweight armature 38 that extends radially outward from the axis the wheel 12 in a direction opposite to that of the lever 16. The armature 38 includes an elongated arm 40 having a counterweight 42 that is mounted to its distal end at a position near the outer periphery of the wheel 12. Like the weight 24, the counterweight 42 helps to both balance the lever 16 and facilitate harmonic resonance of the lever.
With further reference to
Further connected to the transmission housing 36 is a tensioning mechanism 46 that applies tension to the transmission housing and, therefore, the drive lever 16. The tensioning mechanism 46 includes a first or upper tensile member 48 and a second or lower tensile member 50. These tensile members 48, 50 are attached at first ends to the transmission housing 36 at positions above and below the axle 20 of the wheel 12, and are attached at second ends to a tension adjustment mechanism 52. As shown in
The tensioning mechanism 46 is shown more clearly in the detail view of
In addition to facilitating harmonic resonance of the drive lever 16, the tensioning mechanism 46 serves several other purposes. For example, the tensioning mechanism 46 supports the weight of the lever 16 against gravity. The tensioning mechanism 46 therefore prevents the lever 16 from rotating forward or backward if a user were to release the lever when it is not engaged with the wheel 12. In addition, the tensioning mechanism 46 defines a neutral or resting point for the lever 16 during operation. This ensures that a user manipulates the lever 16 within a consistent range of motion, which improves the ergonomics of the device and can prevent long-term injuries at the shoulder from, for example, over-extension of shoulder and elbow during use. Furthermore, in embodiments in which the wheelchair drive mechanism 10 comprises a clutch mechanism that can be used to drive and stop the wheelchair (described below in relation to
Turning next to
To propel the wheelchair forward, the user can squeeze the clutch lever 28 when the drive lever 16 is in an initial rearward position and, while still squeezing the clutch lever, push the lever forward to cause the wheel 12 to rotate in a forward direction. Once the drive lever 16 has been pushed to a forward position at which the user's arm is extended, the user can then release the clutch lever 28, retract the lever back to the rearward position, and repeat the process to further rotate the wheel 12 in the forward direction. Rotation in the reverse direction can be achieved using an inverse process. Specifically, when the drive lever 16 is in an initial forward position, the user can squeeze the clutch lever 28 and pull the lever rearward to cause the wheel 12 to rotate in a rearward direction. Once the drive lever 16 has been pulled to a rearward position at which the user's arm is bent (e.g., near 90°), the user can then release the clutch lever 28, push the lever back to the forward position, and repeat the process to further rotate the wheel 12 in the rearward direction. Both forward and rearward rotation of the wheel 12 can be halted by opposing such rotation with the lever 16 when the clutch lever 28 is activated.
As can be appreciated from the above description of operation of the clutch mechanism 62, several different types of drive operations can be performed. For example, the user can drive both wheels 12 forward to drive the wheelchair forward, drive both wheels backward to drive the wheelchair backward, or drive one wheel forward while driving another wheel backward to cause the wheelchair to rotate in place. Irrespective of the drive operation, the user is required to coordinate actuation of the clutch lever 28 with pulling or pushing of the drive lever 16, which may increase the speed of recovery of the user's arm and hand coordination, strength, and range of motion. In some embodiments, a single clutch lever 28 simultaneously operates the clutch mechanisms 62 of each rear wheel 12.
It is further noted that the drive levers 16 can be used even when the clutch mechanism 62 is not engaged. Specifically, when the drive levers 16 are disengaged from the wheels 12, the user can operate the wheelchair drive mechanism 10 in a “freewheeling” mode and simply push and pull the drive levers against the tension provided by the tensioning mechanism 46 to exercise the arms without ambulation. Therefore, the user can exercise his or her arms with relatively little resistance, with harmonic resonance, and without moving the wheelchair from its position. In some embodiments, such exercise can be performed while playing a game, such as an interactive video game in which movement of the lever 16 results in some action occurring within the game.
It is noted that, in some embodiments, the clutch mechanism 62 can be automatically engaged and disengaged by an onboard computer that processes signals from sensors mounted on the wheelchair and manages the timing of switching between freewheeling and direct-coupling modes to achieve different user-specified manners of operation, such as forward movement, backward movement, and direct coupling.
In addition, certain actions, such as stopping the wheelchair, can be mapped to simple reflexive motions, such as pulling and holding the drive levers in a rearward position (a likely reflex when wanting the chair to stop) or accidentally letting go of a lever such that users with impaired coordination can use the device safely. Such an embodiment emulates all behaviors possible with one-way clutch based devices, but does so with reduced mechanical complexity.
When provided, the transmission 18 enables further types of drive operation.
Irrespective of whether the wheelchair is driven forward using the clutch mechanism 62 or the transmission 18 when in its driving configuration, the tensioning mechanism 46, the weight 24, and the counterweight 42 together create a system with a low damping ratio (e.g., approximately 0.01-0.707) that helps the user generate harmonic resonance (e.g., at a frequency of approximately 0.5 to 1.5 Hz) that assists the user in maintaining the back-and-forth motion of the lever 16 and increases the user's range of motion. In addition, the tensioning mechanism 46, and specifically the tensile member 50, assists the user in slowing forward wheel rotation during braking, because the member is stretched as the drive lever 16 is moved forward due to the rotation of the wheel 12.
With further reference to
Unlike the wheelchair drive mechanism 10, however, the wheelchair drive mechanism 90 comprises no transmission and, therefore, no gears that are used to control operation of the wheelchair. Instead, operation of the wheelchair is solely controlled by actuation of the clutch mechanism 62 by the wheelchair user. Such an implementation may be desirable because of its mechanical simplicity and ease of use by the wheelchair user, as well as the therapeutic effects provided by the required coordination between actuating the clutch mechanism 62 and manipulating the drive lever 16.
In other embodiments, the actuation of the clutch mechanism can be partially automated. For example, the clutch mechanism can be electromechanically actuated by a solenoid or other electromechanical actuator when the user activates an electrical switch provided on the drive lever.
Referring next to
In the above-described embodiments, the clutch mechanism has been shown and described as comprising a brake disc and brake calipers. It is noted that other types of clutch mechanisms can be used. For example, the clutch mechanism can be implemented as a drum brake. Indeed, the clutch mechanism need not comprise a brake at all. In some embodiments, the clutch mechanism can comprise a friction clutch. Such an embodiment is illustrated in
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/014,963, filed Jun. 20, 2014, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under grant/contract number H133E120010, awarded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5242179 | Beddome et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5632499 | Hutcherson | May 1997 | A |
5657836 | BeVier | Aug 1997 | A |
6173986 | Sicher | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6247715 | Korosue | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302226 | Kanno et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7677586 | Bloom | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7717447 | Orford | May 2010 | B2 |
7837210 | Kylstra | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8087684 | Bloswick et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8186699 | Green | May 2012 | B2 |
20070284845 | Roovers et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20130324379 | Zondervan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
J. Klein, S. J. Spencer, J. Allington, J. E. Bobrow, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Optimization of a parallel shoulder mechanism to achieve a high force, low mass, robotic arm exoskeleton,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 26, pp. 710-715, 2010. |
J. Klein, S. J. Spencer, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Breaking it down is better: Haptic decomposition of complex movements aids in robot-assisted motor learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, p. epub ahead of print, 2012. |
M. H. Milot, S. J. Spencer, V. Chan, J. P. Allington, J. Klein, C. Chou, J. E. Bobrow, S. C. Cramer, and D. J.Reinkensmeyer, “Re-training upper extremity movement with the robotic exoskeleton Bones after chronic stroke: a crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of more naturalistic robotic movement training,” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 10, p. 112, 2013. |
P. W. Blower, L. C. Carter, and D. A. Sulch, “Relationship Between Wheelchair Propulsion and Independent Walking in Hemiplegic Stroke,” Stroke, vol. 26, pp. 606-608, 1995. |
R. Singh, J. Hunter, A. Philip, and I. Todd, “Predicting those who will walk after rehabilitation in a specialist stroke unit.,” Clin Rehabil., vol. 20, pp. 149-152, 2006. |
S. McCombe Waller and J. Whitall, “Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training.,” Arch Phys Med Rehabil, vol. 85, pp. 1076-1083, 2004. |
S. J. Housman, K. M. Scott, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 23, pp. 505-514, 2009. |
D. J. Reinkensmeyer, E. T. Wolbrecht, V. Chan, C. Chou, S. C. Cramer, and J. E. Bobrow, “Comparison of 3D, assist-as-needed robotic arm/hand movement training provided with Pneu-WREX to conventional table top therapy following chronic stroke,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, p. To appear, 2012. |
B. H. Dobkin, P. Plummer-D'Amato, R. Elashoff, and J. Lee, “International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed (SIRROWS), improves outcomes.,” Neurorehabil Neural Repair, vol. 24, pp. 235-242, 2010. |
D. J. Gladstone, C. J. Danells, and S. E. Black, “The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties,” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, vol. 16, pp. 232-240, Sep. 2002. |
J. See, L. Der-Yeghian, C. Chou, V. Chan, A. McKenzie, D. Reinkensmeyer, and S. Cramer, “A standardized approach to stroke outcome assessments. II. The Fugl-Meyer motor assessment,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair vol. 27, pp. 732-741, 2013. |
J. H. van der Lee, H. Beckerman, D. L. Knol, H. C. W. de Vet, and L. M. Bouter, “Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients,” Stroke, vol. 35, pp. 1410-1404, 2004. |
N. Friedman, J. B. Rowe, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, and M. Bachman, “The manumeter: A wearable device for monitoring daily use of the wrist and fingers,” Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. epub ahead of print, 2014. |
J. Rowe, N. Friedman, V. Chan, S. Cramer, M. Bachman, and D. Reinkensmeyer, “The Variable Relationship between Arm and Hand Use: A Rationale for Using Finger Magnetometry to Complement Wrist Accelerometry When Measuring Daily Use of the Upper Extremity” Proceedings 36th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference, Aug. 26-30., vol. To appear, 2014. |
J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988. |
S. M. Michaelsen, R. Dannenbaum, and M. F. Levin, “Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized control trial,” Stroke, vol. 37, pp. 186-192, 2006. |
H. Day and J. Jutai, “Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: the PIADS,” Candadian Journal of Rehabilitation, vol. 9, pp. 159-168, 1996. |
L. Demers, R. Weiss-Lambrou, and B. Ska, “Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST).” Assist Technol, vol. 8, pp. 3-13, 1996. |
Foreign search report for PCT/US15/36848 dated Sep. 16, 2015. |
D. K. Zondervan, V. Chan, B. Bodenhofer, R. Augsburger, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, and S. C. Cramer, “Machine-based, self-guided home therapy for individuals with severe arm impairment after stroke: a randomized controlled trial,” Neural Rehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. conditionally accepted, 2014. |
D. U. Jette, N. K. Latham, R. J. Smout, J. Gassaway, M. D. Slavin, and S. D. Horn, “Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities,” Phys Ther, vol. 85, pp. 238-248, 2005. |
V. Y. Ma, C. L., and C. K.J., “The Incidence, Prevalence, Costs and Impact on Disability of Common Conditions Requiring Rehabilitation in the US: Stroke, Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Multiple Sclerosis, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Limb Loss, and Back Pain.,” Arch Phys Med Rehabil, vol. epub ahead of print, 2014. |
B. H. Dobkin, Neurologic Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 1996. |
T. Warabi, K. Inoue, H. Noda, and S. Murakami, “Recovery of voluntary movement in hemiplegic patients: Correlation with degenerative shrinkage of the cerebral peduncles in CT images,” Brain, vol. 113, pp. 177-189, 1990. |
A. Heller, D. T. Wade, V. A. Wood, A. Sunderland, R. L. Hewer, and E. Ward, “Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months,” Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, vol. 50, pp. 714-719, Jun. 1987. |
C. E. Lang, M. J.R., D. S. Reisman, L. Boyd, K. T. Jacobson, S. M. Schindler-Ivens, T. G. Hornby, S. A. Ross, and P.L. Scheets, “Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation.,” Arch Phys Med Rehabil, vol. 90, pp. 1692-1698, 2009. |
K. R. Lohse, C. E. Lang, and L. A. Boyd, “Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation.,” Stroke, vol. 45, pp. 2053-2058, 2014. |
J. Biernaskie, G. Chernenko, and D. Corbett, “Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury,” The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, vol. 24, pp. 1245-1254, Feb. 4, 2004. |
S. C. Cramer, “Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 63, pp. 272-287, Mar. 2008. |
C. Stinear, A. S., and B. W, “Rehabilitation is Initiated Early After Stroke, but Most Motor Rehabilitation Trials Are Not: A Systmatic Review.,” Stroke, vol. 44, pp. 2039-2045, 2013. |
B. W. Smith, D. Zondervan, T. J. Lord, V. Chan, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Feasibility of a bimanual, lever-driven wheelchair for people with wevere arm impairment after stroke,” 36th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference, Aug. 26-30, vol. To appear, 2014. |
T. West and J. Bernhardt, “Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients,” Stroke research and treatment, vol. 2012, p. 13 pages, 2012. |
J. A. Barrett, C. Watkins, R. Plant, H. Dickinson, L. Clayton, A. K. Sharma, A. Reston, J. Gratton, S. Fall, A. Flynn, T. Smith, M. Leathley, S. Smith, and D. H. Barer, “The COSTAR wheelchair study: a two-centre pilot study of self-propulsion in a wheelchair in early stroke rehabilitation,” Clin Rehabil, vol. 15, pp. 32-41, 2001. |
L. Sawaki, “Use-dependent plasticity of the human motor cortex in health and disease,” IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag, vol. 24, pp. 36-39., Jan.-Feb. 2005. |
L. Ada, S. Dorsch, and C. G. Canning, “Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review,” The Australian journal of physiotherapy, vol. 52, pp. 241-248, 2006. |
J. van der Lee, I. Snels, H. Beckerman, G. Lankhorst, R. Wagenaar, and L. Bouter, “Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trial,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 15, pp. 20-31, 2001. |
M. G. Kloosterman, G. J. Snoek, and M. J. Jannink, “Systematic review of the effects of exercise therapy on the upper extremity of patients with spinal-cord injury,” Spinal cord : the official journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia, Sep. 30, 2008. |
R. J. Nudo, “Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery,” Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation, vol. 38, pp. 340-845, Feb. 2007. |
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs, “Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review,” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, vol. 22, pp. 111-121, Mar.-Apr. 2008. |
J. Mehrholz, T. Platz, J. Kugler, and M. Pohl, “Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke,” Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), vol. (4), p. CD006876, Oct. 8, 2008. |
B. Prange, M. J. A. Jannink, C. G. M. Groothuis, H. J. Hermens, and M. J. Ijzerman, “Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke,” J. Rehabil. Res. Develop, vol. 43, pp. 171-184, 2006. |
J. H. Burridge and A. M. Hughes, “Potential for new technologies in clinical practice.,” Curr Opin Neurol, vol. 23, pp. 571-577, 2010. |
S. Brochard, J. Robertson, B. Médée, and O. Rémy-Néris, “What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation?,” Curr Opin Neurol, 2010. |
J. R. Carey, W. K. Durfee, E. Bhatt, A. Nagpal, S. A. Weinstein, K. M. Anderson, and S. M. Lewis, “Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, vol. 21, pp. 216-232, May-Jun. 2007. |
S. V. Adamovich, A. S. Merians, R. Boian, J. A. Lewis, M. Tremaine, G. S. Burdea, M. Recce, and H. Poizner, “A Virtual Reality-Based Exercise System for Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke,” Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, vol. 14, pp. 161-174, 2005. |
A. Ashburn and M. Lynch, “Disadvantages of the early use of wheelchairs in the treatment of hemiplegia,” Clin. Rehabil, vol. 2, pp. 327-331, 1988. |
D. K. Zondervan, B. Smith, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Lever-actuated resonance assistance (LARA): A wheelchair-based method for upper extremity therapy and overground ambulation for people with severe arm impairment,” International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, vol. 6650400, 2013. |
D. Zondervan, L. Palofax, J. Hernandez, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “The resonating arm exerciser: A simple rehabilitation device that mimics robotic active assistance” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 10, p. 39, 2013. |
N. Schweighofer, C. E. Han, S. L. Wolf, M. A. Arbib, and C. J. Winstein, “A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial.,” Phys Ther, vol. 89, pp. 1327-1336, 2009. |
N. Friedman, V. Chan, D. Zondervan, M. Bachman, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “MusicGlove: motivating and quantifying hand movement rehabilitation by using functional grips to play music,” Proceedings 2011 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Conference, pp. 2359-2363, 2011. |
N. Friedman, V. Chan, A. N. Reinkensmeyer, A. Beroukhim, G. Zambrano, M. Bachman, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Retraining and assessing hand movement after stroke using the MusicGlove: Comparison with conventional hand therapy and isometric grip training,” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Research, vol. 11, p. 76, 2014. |
W. Rosamond, K. Flegal, K. Furie, A. Go, K. Greenlund, H. Haase, S. M. Hailpern, M. Ho, V. Howard, B. Kissela, S. Kittner, D. Lloyd-Jones, M. McDermott, J. Meigs, C. Moy, G. Nichol, C. O'Donnell, V. Roger, P. Sorlie, J. Steinberger, T. Thom, M. Wilson, Y. Hong, C. for the American Heart Association Statistics, and S. Stroke Statistics, “Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2008 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee,” Circulation, vol. 117, pp. e25-e146, Jan. 29, 2008. |
R. K. Bode, A. W. Heinemann, P. Semik, and T. Mallinson, “Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke,” Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation, vol. 35, pp. 2537-2542, Nov. 2004. |
N. N. Byl, E. A. Pitsch, and G. M. Abrams, “Functional outcomes can vary by dose: learning-based sensorimotor training for patients stable poststroke,” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, vol. 22, pp. 494-504, Sep.-Oct. 2008. |
G. Kwakkel, “Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration,” Disability & Rehabilitation, vol. 28, pp. 823-830, 2006. |
G. Kwakkel, R. C. Wagenaar, J. W. Twisk, G. J. Lankhorst, and J. C. Koetsier, “Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial,” Lancet, vol. 354, pp. 191-196, Jul. 17, 1999. |
R. Teasell, J. Bitensky, K. Salter, and N. A. Bayona, “The role of timing and intensity of rehabilitation therapies,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 12, pp. 46-57, Summer 2005. |
J. A. Barrett, C. Watkins, and R. Plant, “The COSTAR wheelchair study: a two-centre pilot study of self-propulsion in a wheelchair in early stroke rehabilitation,” Clin Rehabil, vol. 15, pp. 32-41, 2001. |
V. M. Pomeroy, J. Mickelborough, E. Hill, P. Rodgers, and G. Giakas, “A hypothesis: self-propulsion in a wheelchair early after stroke might not be harmful” Clin. Rehabi, vol. 17, pp. 174-180, 2003. |
S. D. Algood, R. A. Cooper, S. G. Fitzgerald, R. Cooper, and M. L. Boninger, “Effect of a pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair on the functional capabilities of persons with tetraplegia.,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 86, pp. 380-386, 2005. |
R. a. Cooper, T. A. Coffman, S. G. Fitzgerald, M. L. Boninger, D. M. Spaeth, W. Ammer, and J. Arva, “Performance assessment of a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair control system,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 10, pp. 121-126, 2002. |
R. a. Cooper, S. G. Fitzgerald, M. L. Boninger, K. Prins, a J. Rentschler, J. Arva, and T. J. O'connor, “Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair.,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 82, pp. 702-708, 2001. |
D. Ding, A. Souza, R. a. Cooper, S. G. Fitzgerald, R. Cooper, A. Kelleher, and M. L. Boninger, “A preliminary study on the impact of pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchairs among individuals with tetraplegia.,” American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists, vol. 87, pp. 821-829, 2008. |
A. Karmarkar, R. a. Cooper, H.-y. Liu, S. Connor, and J. Puhlman, “Evaluation of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards.,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 89, pp. 1191-1198, 2008. |
D. J. Reinkensmeyer, L. E. Kahn, M. Averbuch, A. McKenna-Cole, B. D. Schmit, and W. Z. Rymer, “Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the Arm guide,” J Rehabil Res Dev, vol. 37, pp. 653-662, 2000. |
R. J. Sanchez, J. Liu, S. Rao, P. Shah, R. Smith, S. C. Cramer, J. E Bobrow, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment,” IEEE Transactions on Neural and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 378-389, 2006. |
E. T. Wolbrecht, V. Chan, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, and J. E. Bobrow, “Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions Neural Systems and Rehabiltation Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 286-297, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160015580 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62014963 | Jun 2014 | US |