The claimed subject matter relates to industrial control systems and, more particularly, to obtaining objects that can be utilized in connection with a programmable logic controller.
Due to advances in computing technology, businesses today are able to operate more efficiently when compared to substantially similar businesses only a few years ago. For example, internal networking enables employees of a company to communicate instantaneously by email, quickly transfer data files to disparate employees, manipulate data files, share data relevant to a project to reduce duplications in work product, etc. Furthermore, advancements in technology have enabled factory applications to become partially or completely automated. For instance, operations that once required workers to put themselves proximate to heavy machinery and other various hazardous conditions can now be completed at a safe distance therefrom.
Further, imperfections associated with human action have been minimized through employment of highly precise machines. Many of these factory devices supply data related to manufacturing to databases or web services referencing databases that are accessible by system/process/project managers on a factory floor. For instance, sensors and associated software can detect a number of instances that a particular machine has completed an operation given a defined amount of time. Further, data from sensors can be delivered to a processing unit related to system alarms. Thus, a factory automation system can review collected data and automatically and/or semi-automatically schedule maintenance of a device, replacement of a device, and other various procedures that relate to automating a process.
While various advancements have been made with respect to automating an industrial process, utilization and design of controllers has been largely unchanged. Industrial controllers are special-purpose computers utilized for controlling industrial processes, manufacturing equipment, and other factory automation processes, such as data collection through networked systems. Controllers often work in concert with other computer systems to form an environment whereby a majority of modern and automated manufacturing operations occur. These operations involve front-end processing of materials such as steel production to more intricate manufacturing processes such as automobile production that involves assembly of previously processed materials. Often such as in the case of automobiles, complex assemblies can be manufactured with high technology robotics assisting the industrial control process.
In many automated processes, including the basic production of commodities such as food, beverages, and pharmaceuticals, complex state logic is often designed and programmed by systems Engineers or provided in some cases by automated equipment manufacturers. This logic is often programmed with common PLC ladder logic or higher level languages supported by Sequential Function Charts or Function Blocks. Sequence logic can be employed for a plurality of tasks such as material movement and conveying operations, packaging operations, or as part of an assembly process itself, wherein various stages of an assembly are sequenced from stage to stage until a final assembly occurs. As can be appreciated, much planning and design is required to implement an automated production process that can involve hundreds of machines, computers, and program logic to facilitate proper operation of the respective sequences.
A common problem associated with control systems is lack of uniformity across system/process boundaries, as well as a lack of uniformity between controller manufacturers, software vendors, and customers. Such non-uniformity can be as simplistic as discrepancies in naming conventions between a software vendor and a customer, or as complex as disparate software representations with respect to portions of an industrial automation framework. Given the above-mentioned discrepancies (as well as a myriad of other discrepancies), a substantial amount of ad-hoc coding is often required to automate a process. Accordingly, a substantial amount of cost is incurred by a manufacturer to employ computer and programming specialists to generate and maintain ad-hoc programs necessary to automate a manufacturing process. This cost is then passed on to purchasers of the manufactured product.
With more detail regarding conventional controllers, such controllers have been designed to efficiently undertake real-time control. For instance, conventional programmable logic controllers receive data from sensors and, based upon the received data, control an actuator, drive, or the like. These controllers recognize a source and/or destination of the data by way of a symbol and/or address associated with a source and/or destination. More particularly, industrial controllers include communications ports and/or adaptors, and sensors, actuators, drives, and the like are communicatively coupled to such ports/adaptors. Thus, a controller can recognize device identify when data is received and further deliver control data to an appropriate device.
As can be discerned from the above, data associated with conventional industrial controllers is created, delivered, and/or stored with a flat namespace data structure. In other words, all that can be discovered by reviewing data received and/or output by a controller is an identity of an actuator or sensor and a status thereof. This industrial controller architecture operates efficiently for real-time control of a particular device—however, problems can arise when data from industrial controllers is desired for use by a higher-level system. For example, if data from the controller was desired for use by a scheduling application, individual(s) familiar with the controller must determine which data is desirable, sort the data, package the data in a desired format, and thereafter map such data to the scheduling application. This introduces another layer of software, and thus provides opportunities for confusion in an industrial automation environment. The problem is compounded if several applications wish to utilize similar data. In operation, various controllers output data, package it in a flat namespace structure, and provide it to a network. Each application utilizing the data copies such data to internal memory, sorts the data, organizes the data, and packages the data in a desired format. Accordingly, multiple copies of similar data exist in a plurality of locations, where each copy of the data may be organized and packaged disparately.
It can be determined from the above that providing control logic to conventional programmable logic controllers is a difficult task, as such logic often must be created by way of a proprietary language. Thus, vendors associated with a controller may need to visit a manufacturing site and thereafter generate custom programming for a particular application. This causes unnecessary delay and inefficiencies with respect to an industrial automation environment.
The following presents a simplified summary of the claimed subject matter in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects described herein. This summary is not an extensive overview, and is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope of the claimed subject matter. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
An online library of objects is described herein, wherein such library provides operators/factories with an ability to quickly update control applications given addition of devices/processes to an industrial environment. The library includes objects that are executable by programmable logic controllers and designed in accordance with a hierarchically structured data model. In one particular example, the hierarchically structured data model can be based at least in part on ISA S95 and/or ISA S88 and/or OMAC. Through utilization of a hierarchically structured data model, programming can be accomplished in a “top-down” manner, which is in contrast to the “bottom-up” manner utilized to program conventional programmable logic controllers. For instance, conventionally, tags are first defined and named and associated with sensors/actuators. Due to the flat nature of conventional programming logic, it is important that each controller and each tag be provided with a unique name—otherwise, duplication in data and confusion can result. Use of a hierarchically structured data model ensures uniqueness of names/data, as the hierarchical structure essentially guarantees such uniqueness.
In accordance with one particular feature, objects can be sold from the library to one or more entities desiring use of one or more objects. In one example, a new device can be placed within an industrial system, but an object that facilitates control of the device (by a programmable logic controller) may not be packaged with the device. An operator can access the library of objects and locate a desired object based upon the device type. The operator can then purchase the object through a credit card payment or other suitable online payment, and the object can be delivered to the operator by way of the Internet. Upon receipt of the object, the operator can modify parameters associated therewith, such as timing parameters (e.g., an amount of time that passes between operation of a pump). In another example, a distribution component can be utilized to automatically provide a plurality of users with an object. For example, a plurality of entities can subscribe to the object library, and the distribution component can automatically provide a subset of the subscribers with an object that has been recently added to the object library. Thus, subscribers can immediately receive new control objects upon creation thereof.
In another example, a pinging component can be utilized to provide entities with information regarding a control object recently added to the object library. For example, the object library can be associated with a subscription service and have access to data regarding subscribers to the object library. For instance, a first entity may primarily manufacture a first product using a first set of devices, and a second entity may primarily manufacture a second product and use a second set of devices. The pinging component can selectively make the entities aware of additional objects within the library based at least in part upon such parameters. The pinging component, for example, can send a subscriber an email that includes information relating to an object that has been recently added to the library of objects. In another example, the pinging component can cause transmission of a facsimile to a subscriber. It can thus be discerned that any suitable communication medium is contemplated and intended to fall under the scope of the hereto-appended claims.
In another example, a location component associated with a data storage unit can be utilized in connection with monitoring versions of an object. In other words, the location component can monitor objects associated with a particular enterprise/factory and verify a version of objects running at such plant. This object verification can be undertaken at any suitable time. Furthermore, objects can be sub-classed from existing objects in an online object library. This enables creation of derivative objects that can match a specific instance of a plant automation scenario.
In yet another example, a search function can be provided that enables entities desiring access to a library of objects to search the library. For instance, the search parameters can relate to a type of device that is desirably controlled together with parameters specifying the unique device. The library could then suggest one or more components based at least in part upon the parameters provided for the search.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, certain illustrative aspects of the invention are described herein in connection with the following description and the annexed drawings. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention can be employed and the subject invention is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The claimed subject matter is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the claimed subject matter. It may be evident, however, that such matter can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing the invention.
As used in this application, the terms “component” and “system” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an instance, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a computer and the computer can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
Furthermore, the claimed subject matter may be implemented as a method, apparatus, or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed subject matter. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device, carrier, or media. For example, computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips . . . ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD) . . . ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive . . . ). Additionally it should be appreciated that a carrier wave can be employed to carry computer-readable electronic data such as those used in transmitting and receiving electronic mail or in accessing a network such as the Internet or a local area network (LAN). Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the claimed subject matter. Moreover, the word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs.
Turning now to the drawings,
In accordance with one feature, the object 108 can conform to a hierarchically structured data model (rather than a flat data model) and be executable by a programmable logic controller (not shown). In more detail, the programmable logic controller can include a least a portion of a schema that enables such controller to recognize and output data that is structured in accordance with the hierarchically structured data model. The programmable logic controller, through utilization of this data model, can interact with other controllers as well as higher-level systems, such as an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. ERP systems typically handle manufacturing, logistics, distribution, inventory, shipping, invoicing, and accounting for a company. The schema referenced above can also be employed by an ERP system associated with the programmable logic controller, thereby enabling seamless communication between programmable logic controllers and ERP systems. Conventional systems, in contrast, often require ad-hoc programming to map between low-level logic utilized in controllers with more advanced object-oriented programming languages often employed within ERP systems. Another common use would be to interact with a Supply Chain Management system (SCM).
The hierarchically structured data model can be designed in such a manner to enable the object 108 to correspond to a hierarchical arrangement of devices and/or a hierarchical arrangement of processes that occur within the plant. Furthermore, the hierarchically structured data model can be designed in a manner that enables modeling of a plant across system and/or process boundaries. For instance, today's manufacturing facilities include batch processing, continuous processing, discrete processing, as well as inventory processing. Communication of meaningful data between these systems and processes is extremely difficult, as they are often designed and operated without regard for an adjacent process. The hierarchically structured data model can be implemented so that a substantially similar structure is provided with respect to a batch process, a continuous process, a discrete process, and inventory tracking. In one particular example, the hierarchically structured data model can be modeled in accordance with ISA S95, ISA S88, and/or a combination thereof.
An example is provided herein to illustrate one or more applications of the system 100. A programmable logic controller that can execute objects that are designed in accordance with the hierarchically structured data model can be associated with a device that has been recently produced and/or not utilized within an enterprise associated with the programmable logic controller. Thus, the programmable logic controller will not include control logic associated with such device. Conventionally, a vendor of the device and/or the programmable logic controller would go on site to configure the controller so that it can control the device. Using the system 100 and a hierarchically structured data model, however, one need only to access the data store 106 to retrieve an object that is associated with the device. For example, if the device is a pump, an object that corresponds to such pump can be created and placed within the data store 106. A requesting entity can then retrieve the object by way of the Internet 104, and then quickly modify such object as desired. For instance, the object can include parameters relating to speed of the pump, timing relating to the pump, and the like. The object retrieved from the data store 106 can be a shell with a structure relating to the pump, and the operator can quickly and easily populate the shell so that a customized object is implemented by the programmable logic controller. Moreover, metadata associated with objects can be provided therewith. This metadata can describe intended use of the object, identity a device that is associated with the object, etc, thereby aiding in discovery and operability of the device.
With more detail regarding the object 108, availability of such object 108 can be constrained as a function of time. For instance, the object 108 may only be available until a specified date and time. In another example, the availability of the object 108 and the presentation of such object 108 can be configured with respect to a context of a requesting entity, including entity role (whether the entity is an operator, a technician, associated with diagnostics, etc.). Furthermore, the data store 106 can be distributed, and contents therein can be collaborated to present a unified library of objects. Moreover, access to the data store 106 by clients can be managed based at least in part upon subscriptions and other time-based access criteria.
Referring now to
The security component 210 can be associated with a sales component 212 that facilitates sale of the object 204 to the requesting entity 202. For instance, the sales component 212 can include hardware/software that facilitates providing payment options to the requesting entity 202 as well as processing of payment from such entity 202. For instance, the sales component 212 can process credit card payments, payments from checking/savings account, or any other form of electronic payment. Furthermore, the sales component 212 can save such information for further purchases. In another example, the sales component 212 can generate and deliver a bill to the requesting entity 202, and the requesting entity 202 can then issue payment by mail if desired.
Upon receipt of payment and/or generation of billing by the sales component 212, a location component 214 can locate the object 204, and a delivery component 216 can deliver the object 204 to the requesting entity 202 over the Internet 208. For example, the delivery component 216 can provide the requesting entity 202 with an option to download the object 204 to a hard disk associated with the requesting entity 202. In another example, the deliver component 216 can deliver the object 204 to the requesting entity 202 by way of email (as an attachment). It is thus understood that the delivery component 216 can facilitate delivery of the object 204 to the requesting entity 202 over the Internet 208 through any suitable means.
Now turning to
Furthermore, when one or more of the plurality of objects 310-314 are provided to the requesting entity 302, an audit trail can be generated, thereby allowing management interfaces (not shown) to report on where and when versions of the objects 310-314 have been delivered. Furthermore, it is understood that the data store 316 can be distributed—however, such distribution can be transacted thereby allowing presentation of sets of library contents from multiple sources to be aggregated and supplied as a single set. Furthermore, the objects 310-314 can include replaceable arguments that generate requests for the requesting entity 302 to provide information relevant to an environment in which a requested object is being instantiated. In still another example, access to the data store can be managed by work flows, wherein such work flows are utilized to manage deployment of the objects 310-314 and invoking supporting components such as wizards, security requests, validation scripts, and resource bindings (material, equipment, personnel, etc.).
Referring now to
The system 400 can further include a subscription component 406 that enables a plurality of entities 408-412 to subscribe to the data store 402. For example, the entities 408-412 can register with the subscription component 406, much like an individual registering for a listserv. The subscription component 406 can retain information such as IP address associated with the entities 408-412, email addresses associated with the entities 408-412, preferences of the entities 408-412, devices utilized by the entities 408-412, and any other suitable information. The system 400 can further include a detection component 414 that detects instances when an object is added to the data store 402. For example, the detection component 414 can detect that the object 404 has been recently added to the data store 402. The detection component 414 can relay an indication that the object 404 has been added to the data store 402 to an analysis component 416, which can in turn analyze subscription information associated with the subscription component 406. For instance, the object 404 can relate to a press, and the detection component 414 can inform the analysis component 416 of the addition of the object 404 to the data store 402 and parameters associated with the object. In another example, the detection component 414 can detect creation of a new version of an existing object, and inform the analysis component 416 of the new version (together with parameters associated with the version). The analysis component 416 can review subscription information associated with the subscription component 406 and determine which of the entities 408 would like to receive the object 404 (or the updated version thereof). A distribution component 418 can then facilitate automatic distribution of the object 404 or updated version thereof to appropriate subscribing entities. More particularly, the distribution component 418 can provide a location component 420 with an identity of one or more objects from within the data store 402 that are to be distributed to a subset of the entities 408-412. The location component 420 can locate the objects, and thereafter such objects can be distributed to the entities by way of the Internet 422.
Referring now to
The system 500 can further include a scheduling component 516 that can determine times that the entities 508-512 are operating at off-peak hours. For example, bandwidth may be crucial to the entities 508-512 during peak operating hours, and such entities may not wish to receive objects during these hours. Accordingly, the entities 508-512 can register with the scheduling component 516 and inform such component 516 of times that peak hours occur. In another example, the scheduling component 516 can monitor the entities 508-512 and make a probabilistic determination relating to optimal delivery times of the object 504. A distribution component 518 can then be employed to facilitate distribution of the object 504 to a subset of the entities 508-512 during off-peak hours. For instance, the distribution component 518 can deliver an identity of the object 504 to a location component 520, which can in turn locate the object 504 from within the data store 502. The object 504 can then be delivered to a subset of the entities 508-512 by way of the Internet 506.
Turning now to
The system 600 can further include an updating component 612 that enables authorized entities to add objects to the data store 602. For example, an owner of a website that facilitates access to the data store 602 can create new objects and place such objects within the data store 602. Unauthorized entities, however, will not be able to add content to the data store 602. The system 600 can also include a sales component 614 that facilitates sale of the object 606 to entities that request such object. For example, the sales component 614 can sell a defined number of accesses to the data store 602 to a requesting entity. In another example, the sales component 614 can sell an entity access to the data store 602 for a set amount of time. Thus, the entity can access objects within the data store 602 for such period of time without additional pay. It can thus be understood that any suitable manner for selling objects from the data store 602 is contemplated and intended to fall under the scope of the hereto-appended claims.
Now referring to
The programmable logic controller 702 can further include a requesting component 708 that requests an object from an object library system 710 by way of the Internet 712. For instance, the device recognition component 704 can inform the requesting component 708 of an object or objects associated with the device 706, and the requesting component 708 can thereafter request such object from the object library system 710. The object can then be provided to the programmable logic controller 702 either directly or indirectly. For example, the object from the object library system 710 may first be provided to an editor, where parameters of the object can be customized for operations associated with the device 706.
Referring to
Turning specifically to
At 810, a request for the object is received over the Internet. For instance, an operator can log onto the Internet and enter a URL that directs the operator to the data storage unit. A screen can then be provided that illustrates to the operator disparate objects that are available, and the operator can request a particular object by selecting the object by way of a mouse click, voice commands, keystrokes, or the like. At 812, the object is delivered over the Internet to a requesting entity, and at 814 the object is implemented in a programmable logic controller. It is understood, however, that after delivery but before implementation, the object can be provided to an editor for customization of one or more parameters and thereafter implemented at 814. The methodology 800 completes at 816.
Referring now to
Now turning to
If at 1008 it is determined that the requesting entity is not a subscriber, then at 1014 payment is requested for the object. For instance, a secure payment server can be employed to receive credit card information, access to a checking/savings account, or the like. At 1016, a determination is made regarding whether payment has been provided and verified. If payment is provided, the object is delivered to the requesting entity at 1012. If it is determined that payment has not been provided, then the request for the object is denied to the requesting entity at 1018. The methodology completes at 1020.
Now referring to
At 1110, a request for an object associated with the device is generated. As alluded to above, the object can conform to a hierarchically structured data model, such as one that is designed based at least in part upon ISA S95, ISA S88, and/or a combination thereof. The request can be generated based at least in part upon the parameters that were determined at 1108. At 1112, the request is automatically delivered to an online object store. The online object store can thereafter service the request and provide an editor and/or the programmable logic controller with the requested object. The methodology 1100 completes at 1114.
Turning now to
Referring now to
With reference to
The system bus 1418 can be any of several types of bus structure(s) including the memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus or external bus, and/or a local bus using any variety of available bus architectures including, but not limited to, 8-bit bus, Industrial Standard Architecture (ISA), Micro-Channel Architecture (MSA), Extended ISA (EISA), Intelligent Drive Electronics (IDE), VESA Local Bus (VLB), Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), Universal Serial Bus (USB), Advanced Graphics Port (AGP), Personal Computer Memory Card International Association bus (PCMCIA), and Small Computer Systems Interface (SCSI).
The system memory 1416 includes volatile memory 1420 and nonvolatile memory 1422. The basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines to transfer information between elements within the computer 1412, such as during start-up, is stored in nonvolatile memory 1422. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory 1422 can include read only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory 1420 includes random access memory (RAM), which acts as external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms such as synchronous RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), Synchlink DRAM (SLDRAM), and direct Rambus RAM (DRRAM).
Computer 1412 also includes removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.
It is to be appreciated that
A user enters commands or information into the computer 1412 through input device(s) 1436. Input devices 1436 include, but are not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, TV tuner card, digital camera, digital video camera, web camera, and the like. These and other input devices connect to the processing unit 1414 through the system bus 1418 via interface port(s) 1438. Interface port(s) 1438 include, for example, a serial port, a parallel port, a game port, and a universal serial bus (USB). Output device(s) 1440 use some of the same type of ports as input device(s) 1436. Thus, for example, a USB port may be used to provide input to computer 1412, and to output information from computer 1412 to an output device 1440. Output adapter 1442 is provided to illustrate that there are some output devices 1440 like monitors, speakers, and printers, among other output devices 1440, which require special adapters. The output adapters 1442 include, by way of illustration and not limitation, video and sound cards that provide a means of connection between the output device 1440 and the system bus 1418. It should be noted that other devices and/or systems of devices provide both input and output capabilities such as remote computer(s) 1444.
Computer 1412 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as remote computer(s) 1444. The remote computer(s) 1444 can be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a workstation, a microprocessor based appliance, a peer device or other common network node and the like, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to computer 1412. For purposes of brevity, only a memory storage device 1446 is illustrated with remote computer(s) 1444. Remote computer(s) 1444 is logically connected to computer 1412 through a network interface 1448 and then physically connected via communication connection 1450. Network interface 1448 encompasses communication networks such as local-area networks (LAN) and wide-area networks (WAN). LAN technologies include Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI), Copper Distributed Data Interface (CDDI), Ethernet/IEEE 802.3, Token Ring/IEEE 802.5 and the like. WAN technologies include, but are not limited to, point-to-point links, circuit switching networks like Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDN) and variations thereon, packet switching networks, and Digital Subscriber Lines (DSL).
Communication connection(s) 1450 refers to the hardware/software employed to connect the network interface 1448 to the bus 1418. While communication connection 1450 is shown for illustrative clarity inside computer 1412, it can also be external to computer 1412. The hardware/software necessary for connection to the network interface 1448 includes, for exemplary purposes only, internal and external technologies such as, modems including regular telephone grade modems, cable modems and DSL modems, ISDN adapters, and Ethernet cards.
What has been described above includes examples of the invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the subject invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the invention are possible. Accordingly, the invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/680,682, filed on May 13, 2005 and entitled SCHEMA THAT FACILITATES PLANT REPRESENTATION AND RELATED FUNCTIONALITY, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4268901 | Subrizi et al. | May 1981 | A |
4347564 | Sugano et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4623964 | Getz et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4990838 | Kawato et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5072374 | Sexton et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5185708 | Hall et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5253184 | Kleinschnitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5282244 | Fuller et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5301320 | McAtee et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5446868 | Gardea et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455775 | Huber et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485620 | Sadre et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5504891 | Motoyama et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5537585 | Blickenstaff et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5572731 | Morel et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5611059 | Benton et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619724 | Moore | Apr 1997 | A |
5634048 | Ryu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5644740 | Kiuchi | Jul 1997 | A |
5675748 | Ross | Oct 1997 | A |
5715413 | Ishai et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721905 | Elixmann et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5761499 | Sondregger | Jun 1998 | A |
5790935 | Payton | Aug 1998 | A |
5797137 | Golshani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812773 | Norin | Sep 1998 | A |
5828851 | Nixon et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832486 | Itoh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838563 | Dove et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848273 | Fontana et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862052 | Nixon et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5884025 | Baehr et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884033 | Duvall et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5913029 | Shostak | Jun 1999 | A |
5924094 | Sutter | Jul 1999 | A |
5936539 | Fuchs | Aug 1999 | A |
5940294 | Dove | Aug 1999 | A |
5940854 | Green, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951440 | Reichlinger | Sep 1999 | A |
5960420 | Leymann et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966705 | Koneru | Oct 1999 | A |
5970494 | Velissaropoulos et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978577 | Rierden et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980078 | Krivoshein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983016 | Brodsky et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011899 | Ohishi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032208 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044217 | Brealey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061740 | Ferguson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063129 | Dadd et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081899 | Byrd | Jun 2000 | A |
6098116 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101531 | Eggleston et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157864 | Schwenke et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195591 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208987 | Nihei | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234899 | Nulph | May 2001 | B1 |
6266726 | Nixon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268853 | Hoskins et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275977 | Nagai et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6308168 | Dovich et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308224 | Leymann et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311187 | Jeyaraman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327511 | Naismith et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336152 | Richman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356920 | Vandersluis | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377957 | Jeyaraman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393566 | Levine | May 2002 | B1 |
6398106 | Ulvr et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409082 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411987 | Steger et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415983 | Ulvr et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425051 | Burton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438744 | Toutonghi et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445963 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446202 | Krivoshein et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457053 | Satagopan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469986 | Lecheler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473656 | Langels et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477435 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484061 | Papadopoulos et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6501996 | Bieber | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505247 | Steger et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510352 | Badavas et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539271 | Lech et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6539430 | Humes | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539458 | Holmberg | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6615091 | Birchenough et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631519 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643555 | Eller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6661426 | Jetha et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6664981 | Ashe et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6681227 | Kojima et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687817 | Paul | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697797 | Hoggatt et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704746 | Sokolov et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714949 | Frey, Jr. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714981 | Skaggs | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6738821 | Wilson et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745089 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748486 | Burton et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751634 | Judd | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758403 | Keys et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6760732 | Busshart et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6763395 | Austin | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6766312 | Landt | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768987 | Couch et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769095 | Brassard et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6778537 | Ishibashi | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6801822 | Fujiwara et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807632 | Carpentier et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809732 | Zatz et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6832120 | Frank et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836892 | Ikoma et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839790 | Barros De Almeida et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6842769 | Kim et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6853920 | Hsiung et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865509 | Hsiung, et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868413 | Grindrod et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874145 | Ye et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874146 | Iyengar | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880060 | Talagala et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889282 | Schollenberger | May 2005 | B2 |
6901578 | Beaven et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904450 | King et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6904473 | Bloxham et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6920474 | Walsh et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928521 | Burton et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6930985 | Rathi et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934749 | Black et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938079 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944626 | Cameron et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947947 | Block et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950900 | McKean et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954770 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6961728 | Wynblatt et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973556 | Milligan et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6975913 | Kreidler et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985902 | Wise et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000017 | McGill et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7065714 | Theel et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7146355 | Chu-Carroll | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162312 | Gross et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171476 | Maeda et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7225193 | Mets et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7251222 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7308454 | Abineri et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20020007286 | Okamoto | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012401 | Karolys et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013748 | Edmison et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020069167 | Conlow | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073236 | Helgeson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087786 | Burton et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091838 | Rupp et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103785 | Harvey | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131404 | Mehta et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161827 | Brault | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020188366 | Pepper et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194577 | Connor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014387 | Kreidler et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036876 | Fuller et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065673 | Grobler et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090514 | Cole et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120710 | Pulsipher et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123467 | Du et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126308 | Kim | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172145 | Nguyen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177114 | Lin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184584 | Vachuska et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212828 | Miyazaki et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218641 | Longobardi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006401 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024995 | Swaine | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044421 | Brune et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073565 | Kaufman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098153 | Neudeck | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098269 | Wise et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117624 | Brandt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153171 | Brandt et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167790 | Grasse | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193449 | Wildman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196855 | Davies et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199655 | Davies et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203620 | Thome et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210629 | Klindt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249771 | Berg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260591 | King | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268186 | Maturana et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005289 | Adolph et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015397 | Abineri et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043922 | Weidl et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044112 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065626 | Kappelhoff et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065829 | Birkhoelzer | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065971 | Honda | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069853 | Tyson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091349 | Scheibli | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102672 | Brothers | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107897 | Callaghan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108247 | Heinla et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120021 | Tang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129247 | Gammel et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135782 | Ando et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154741 | Hebert et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166215 | Holloway et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177687 | Rao | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187925 | Schechinger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193118 | Le et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198248 | Morimoto et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216460 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223010 | Murray | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251527 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256788 | Mukai | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268253 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278373 | Corbett et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004475 | Brackett et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004847 | Claudatos et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064428 | Colaco et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060173895 | Engquist et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195817 | Moon | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212855 | Bournas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070268922 | Dougan et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060259500 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60680682 | May 2005 | US |