Vessels for holding food items may include a separate lid, but are often not provided with an air-tight seal. This is particularly the case for glass vessels for example. Air-tight container-lid systems are typically fabricated from a rigid plastic material, and typically utilize a separate seal member disposed between the lid and container.
Features and advantages of the disclosure will readily be appreciated by persons skilled in the art from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the drawing wherein:
In the following detailed description and in the several figures of the drawing, like elements are identified with like reference numerals. The figures may not be to scale, and relative feature sizes may be exaggerated for illustrative purposes.
In accordance with one aspect, a lid structure with latches is configured for sealing use with container vessels of different materials having differing manufacturing dimensional tolerances, e.g. plastic, metal, glass and ceramic vessels. Plastic vessels can typically be manufactured to tighter tolerances than vessels of other materials such as glass and ceramic. For example, a glass or ceramic vessel may have a flat circumferential seal surface, whose flatness has a certain dimensional tolerance. Plastic or metal vessels can be manufactured with tighter tolerances, so that a similar flat circumferential seal surface can be expected to seal to a lid with greater seal effectiveness than can the glass or ceramic vessel. A lid with capability for use on a plurality of vessel types, i.e. a universal lid, provides significant advantages. For example, the lid may be sold to consumers separately from the vessel, allowing the user to purchase a separately sold vessel to be used with the lid. This provides the consumers with the capability to choose the vessel which best meets his or her needs, while still being able to use the same lid. Another advantage is that the number of types of lids which must be held in inventory by a merchandiser is reduced, since the same lid can be used with multiple types of vessels. Costs of production may be reduced, due to increased scale of production.
In accordance with another aspect, a lid configuration is provided with capability of stacking multiple lids together and with interference fitting of the adjacent lids, for maintaining the lid stack in place.
Another aspect is a lid and vessel configured to provide the capability of stacking the vessel on top of the lid, with an interference fit of lid features to the base of the vessel.
An exemplary embodiment of a vessel-lid combination includes a glass, ceramic, metal or plastic vessel having an open top surrounded by a peripheral edge, a lid fabricated of a plastic material, and a seal structure integrated with the lid to form a unitary structure. The lid is configured to attach to the open top by means of a latch or set of latches integrated with the lid, and the seal structure is configured to provide a substantially air-tight seal between the lid and the peripheral edge of the vessel when the lid is attached to the vessel. In one exemplary embodiment, the vessel is a container fabricated of a glass suitable for baking or oven heating applications. In another embodiment, the vessel is fabricated of a plastic material such as polypropylene. In a general sense the vessel could be any container with a suitable locking lip to engage the lid latches, including plastic, ceramic, metal, glass or other containers. In an exemplary embodiment, a lid is configured for use on different vessels fabricated from dissimilar materials and with different manufacturing tolerances.
The cross-sectional views of
The lid 70 is attached to the vessel 60 and latched in place to cover the open vessel top, using latches 80 connected by living hinges to the lid proper on opposite sides of the lid. The latches have latch hook features 82A which engage the latch engagement lip portion 64B of the vessel when the lid is placed on the vessel and the latches rotated about the hinges to the latched position shown in
The lid 70 in an exemplary embodiment is fabricated by injection molding using a two shot molding technique, in which a first shot structure is fabricated of a first plastic material, and then the lid structure is completed in a second shot in which a second plastic material is overmolded to a portion of the first shot structure to form the seal structure 90. The second plastic material is bonded to surfaces of the first shot material as a result of the molding process.
FIGS. 4 and 5A-5C illustrate an exemplary embodiment of the second shot structure, the seal structure 90, in isolation. An exemplary over-mold material used in the second shot is a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) material. By fabricating the seal structure in this manner using an overmold, second shot process, several advantages are obtained, including lower cost relative to a separate, removable seal, cleanliness (by avoiding space between a removable seal and the lid structure), and ease of use since the seal structure is permanently attached to the first shot structure.
The seal structure 90 in this embodiment comprises several portions. A main body portion 90C is attached to the inner wall of the skirt and to the web portion. Another seal portion is a protruding spring portion 90B. Another seal portion is compression portion 90A. For use with glass vessels, a feature is that the seal structure is configured to absorb the greater flatness variability in the sealing area or surface of the glass vessel. The spring portion 90B of the seal structure is configured to flex easily to absorb the variability of the vessel seal surface, while the compression portion 90A extends below the skirt portion by a sufficient distance to compress in response to latch closure and provide adequate latch retention force to hold the lid latches in the closed position. The flexing of the spring portion is illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, the spring seal portion 90B is a finger-like protrusion, angled inwardly toward the interior portion of the lid. In other embodiments, the spring seal portion may be angled outwardly, away from the lid interior. Other suitable configurations for the spring portion may be employed, such as a rib downwardly extending from the compression portion, or an elbow-shaped cross-section configuration. Exemplary dimensions of the spring portion for one embodiment are a height dimension on the order of 0.04 to 0.05 inch, and a thickness of 0.025 to 0.040 inch. Exemplary dimensions for the compression portion are a thickness of about 0.10 inch and a height varying from about 0.085 to 0.15 inch, depending on the location around the perimeter. An exemplary overall height dimension for the seal structure is 0.35 inch, for an exemplary embodiment.
The lid latching and sealing structures interact with the vessel 60-1 in a manner similar to that described above regarding the glass vessel 60. The flat top edge portion 60-1-4A of the plastic vessel may be flatter than the corresponding seal surface of the glass vessel.
Another feature of a lid and vessel combination is the provision of a lid receptacle feature, configured to capture the base of a vessel in a stacking arrangement, without utilization of special features on the vessel base. The stacking is illustrated in
The receptacle feature of the lid 70 is illustrated, for example, in
This lid-vessel stacking may be employed to stack two or more of the vessel-lid systems while securely preventing lateral movement of an upper system relative to a lower system. Moreover, this can be achieved without special features in the base of the vessel. The vessel walls adjacent the base may be vertical or closer to vertical in the areas of interference with the lid, and with the angle relative to vertical increasing above the areas of interference.
Another feature of an embodiment of the lid 70 is the capability of lid nesting of multiple lids with interference fit between adjacent lids to lock the lids together.
While the exemplary embodiments of the lids and vessels have heretofore been described with respect to rectangular configurations, the features and aspects may be utilized with other configurations. For example,
The lid 70 is designed for sealing attachment to vessels with a range of dimensional tolerances. The vessel rim as noted above includes a generally flat top rim surface, for example 64 (
In another embodiment, the sealing surface at the rim of the vessel may be designed with a slight slope downwardly from the center of the sealing surface toward the center of the lid, as well as a slight slope downwardly in a direction away from the lid center. This embodiment can accomplish the same benefit in reducing variations in latching force whether the lid periphery is shifted inwardly or outwardly, either as a result of misalignment or manufacturing tolerances.
Although the foregoing has been a description and illustration of specific embodiments, various modifications and changes thereto can be made by persons skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional patent application 61/609,142, filed Mar. 9, 2012, and entitled “Lid, and Container System and Lid.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1542115 | Weis | Jun 1925 | A |
3117692 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3409123 | McCormick | Nov 1968 | A |
3797694 | See et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3800972 | Raymond | Apr 1974 | A |
4206845 | Christian | Jun 1980 | A |
4482077 | Henderson | Nov 1984 | A |
4494674 | Roof | Jan 1985 | A |
4501378 | Berfield | Feb 1985 | A |
4512498 | Leibinger | Apr 1985 | A |
4562047 | Sestak et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4702389 | Bozinovich et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4703857 | Jahnen et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4795056 | Meyers | Jan 1989 | A |
4936483 | Ballu | Jun 1990 | A |
4951832 | Tenney et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4971774 | Schwanke et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5016756 | Wischhusen et al. | May 1991 | A |
5115934 | Nelson | May 1992 | A |
5116240 | Wischhusen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5184745 | Havens et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5225125 | Wildfeuer et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5356026 | Andress et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5377860 | Littlejohn et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5409128 | Mitchell | Apr 1995 | A |
5586656 | Abrums | Dec 1996 | A |
5641065 | Owens et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5692617 | Adams | Dec 1997 | A |
5699925 | Petruzzi | Dec 1997 | A |
5769229 | Andress et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799792 | Abrums | Sep 1998 | A |
5868273 | Daenen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5944211 | Woodnorth et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6129234 | Culig et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6170691 | Morris, Sr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170696 | Tucker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6343708 | Riso | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6729472 | Stucke et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
D493335 | Armato | Jul 2004 | S |
6793096 | Seok | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6796430 | Mercier et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
D501764 | Lerner | Feb 2005 | S |
D503872 | Armato | Apr 2005 | S |
6910599 | Tucker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7097067 | Scarabelli et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7261219 | Tucker et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7510096 | Wang | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7594586 | Cai | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7621417 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7726483 | Ramanujam et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020148846 | Luburic | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030019878 | Scarabelli et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030116572 | Klock et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050045628 | Chan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060027588 | Mackovic-Basic et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070907 | O'Shea | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060261065 | Claypool et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070119743 | Tucker et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070187277 | Furlong | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070284276 | Luttik et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080000795 | Deakin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080105684 | Lindsay | May 2008 | A1 |
20090000977 | Coonce | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090008284 | Lown et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026205 | Moon | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090078715 | Kim | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084796 | Coonce et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090166369 | Savicki | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090173656 | Furlong | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206080 | Ribi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090223986 | Song | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100065461 | Chhay | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100170204 | Altheimer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100170824 | Ramanujam et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176022 | Furlong | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200588 | Bergman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100237070 | Coonce et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110031705 | Peddle et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110163099 | DiPietro et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19526719 | Jan 1997 | DE |
19543388 | May 1997 | DE |
20320088 | Jun 2005 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, mailed Sep. 25, 2013, re International Application PCT/US2013029724, 16 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130233854 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61609142 | Mar 2012 | US |