Some embodiments described herein are directed to a lidar scanning system. Specifically, some embodiments are directed to a lidar scanning system with increased angular beam coverage.
Compact laser scanners often employ two single-axis mirrors in succession to provide two dimensions of far field coverage. When implementing a raster scan using a silicon micro-electro-mechanical-system (MEMS) mirror, the first element is usually a circular, resonantly actuated mirror with a resonate frequency tuned to cover the rapid scanning, typically broader angular coverage, horizontal sweep axis. A second, larger, linear actuated slow-axis mirror is typically used to cover the narrower vertical axis. With raster scanning, the laser beam sweeps back and forth horizontally while sweeping slowly in the vertical axis to provide a rectangular field of coverage. A small resonate MEMS mirror takes advantage of its high self-resonate frequency to allow both rapid field coverage and larger angular swing while the following linear MEMS mirror provides relatively slow controlled movement of the vertical axis. The second mirror is also typically larger than the first mirror in at least one-axis to allow the beam to move across its surface due to the physical displacement of the beam caused by angular rotation of the first mirror.
When two MEMS mirrors are used in succession, the greater the separation between the mirrors, the more physical travel of the beam on the second mirror due to angular rotation of the first. Thus, it is critical to place the mirrors as close together as practical. It is also desirable that the laser beam entering the second mirror be as close to normal to the mirror surface to minimize scan field distortion.
Because the horizontal axis mirror is operated in a resonant mode, the horizontal axis mirror velocity is sinusoidal, reaching zero at the edges of the scan pattern. The falling velocity moving from the center of field requires compensating the laser firing points for the change in velocity by firing the laser more rapidly at the center of the field and slower at the edges. If the scanner position is given as:
Angular position=28cos(2*pi*f*t) with f or frequency equal to 28 KHz
With the angular rate the derivative of this function or:
Angular rate=28*2*pi*f sin(2*pi*f*t).
Because the maximum rate of change occurs when sine=1 (center of the field), the max rate is 4.5e6 degrees per second. With a laser transmit minimum burst duration of 125 nsec the result is a maximum angular beam smear in the horizontal axis of 0.55 degrees or close to 10 milliradian (mrad). Unfortunately, the high angular rate of the resonate axis mirror dictates the firing of only a single, shorter laser pulse per scanner measurement location. Even for the shortest single pulse, the horizontal angular smear still exceeds the desired horizontal resolution of 0.5 degrees.
Continuing with the example described above, the use of the larger linear mirror for the horizontal axis resolves the angular smear problem because the scan rate can be reduced by at least a factor of fifty. The linear mirror has a maximum linear driven scan frequency of 500 Hz in comparison to the 27 Khz provided by the resonate mirror. The use of the slower linear mirror improves sensitivity and range by allowing a longer signal integration time at each measurement location and for an increased laser burst width for an additional improvement in receiver sensitivity. The linear mirror has a lower angular swing than the resonantly actuated mirror without the assistance of the mechanical gain obtained by operating the mirror at its natural resonance frequency. The larger mirror provides +/−8 degrees of tilt corresponding to +/−16 degrees of beam steering, which is roughly half that required for the horizontal field of coverage.
A variety of optical configurations have been used historically in two-axis scanning systems to eliminate beam travel on the second scanning mirror. The basic approach diagrammed in
If each relay is telecentric, the ray bundles will intersect normal to the image plane for rays entering from their respective entrance pupils. If the steering mirrors are placed at their respective entrance pupils, beam steering at the first mirror will converge at the second mirror with only an angle shift, but without axial displacement. Equal focal lengths for the two lens relay system results in no field magnification while different values can result in magnification or de-magnification. The primary limitation of this approach is that for large steering angles the relay elements become much more complex, requiring multiple lens elements to maintain good image quality.
Achieving the large field of coverage in a sufficiently small mechanical envelope required investigating a unique approach. A 1973 patent “Unit Power Imaging Catoptric Anastigmat” (U.S. Pat. No. 3,748,015) by Offner showed the potential to implement the functionality of the two-relay optical system in a much smaller, two element reflective system. The approach relays an object point to a physically separated image point with unity magnification, essentially aberration free using just two spherical mirrors. The limitation of unity magnification eliminated this approach as a method to expand field coverage directly, but it offered the opportunity to eliminate beam walk on the second mirror.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a first embodiment directed to a lidar transmit scanner comprising a catoptric relay assembly comprising an entrance aperture for receiving one or more collimated laser beams, wherein the one or more collimated laser beams are configured along a plane tangent to a line connecting the entrance aperture and an exit aperture and are configured to converge at the entrance aperture. The catoptric relay assembly comprises the entrance aperture and the exit aperture positioned at decentered symmetrical points from an optical axis and coincident to a single point of rotation. The lidar transmit scanner further comprising a convex spherical mirror with a radius of curvature roughly equal to a distance from a front surface of the convex spherical mirror to the single point of rotation, a concave cylindrical optic located approximately halfway between the convex spherical mirror and the single point of rotation, the concave cylindrical optic produced by revolution of a rectangular cross-section around a first vertical axis crossing through two entrance and exit apertures, the concave cylindrical optic comprising a center reflective stripe oriented along a revolution axis between optically transmissive regions of the concave cylindrical optic, the convex spherical mirror and the concave cylindrical optic comprising centers of curvature approximately coincident to a second single point of rotation along a center axis of the convex spherical mirror and the concave cylindrical optic, a horizontal single axis scanning mirror disposed at the entrance aperture and comprising a mirror rotation axis coincident with a second vertical axis established by an entrance aperture location and an exit aperture location, and a vertical single axis scanning mirror disposed at the exit aperture and comprising a vertical single axis scanning mirror rotation axis orthogonal to said horizontal single axis scanning mirror.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Other aspects and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from the following detailed description of the embodiments and the accompanying drawing figures.
Embodiments of the disclosure are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
The drawing figures do not limit the disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed and described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the disclosure.
The following detailed description references the accompanying drawings that illustrate specific embodiments in which the current disclosure can be practiced. The embodiments are intended to describe aspects in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice those embodiments of the disclosure. Other embodiments can be utilized, and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the current disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the disclosure is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
In this description, references to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “embodiments” mean that the feature or features being referred to are included in at least one embodiment of the technology. Separate references to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “embodiments” in this description do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment and are also not mutually exclusive unless so stated and/or except as will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the description. For example, a feature, structure, act, etc. described in one embodiment may also be included in other embodiments but is not necessarily included. Thus, the technology can include a variety of combinations and/or integrations of the embodiments described herein.
Generally, a lidar laser scanning system is described herein. In some embodiments, a transmit scanner may provide a large scan angle in a horizontal axis and excellent beam quality with a small physical volume of roughly one-half cubic inch. In some embodiments, an Offner relay between first and second MEMS mirrors may be optimized for angular coverage in one axis and the use of two angularly offset beams for double coverage in the horizontal axis. The modified Offner optical relay between the MEMS mirrors may be optimized for angular coverage in one axis. This approach may be used to accommodate a large refractive angular field dictated by the injection of two angularly separated beams into the first MEMS horizontal axis scanning mirror. In some embodiments, the refractive angular field may comprise an anamorphic expansion optic providing unequal expansion in at least two axes.
In some embodiments, a laser scanner comprising two single-axis MEMS scanning mirrors is disclosed. The laser scanner may utilize an optical relay configuration between the mirrors to eliminate beam displacement on the second mirror. The lack of physical beam displacement on the second scanning mirror, independent of the first mirrors' scan angle, may eliminate the need to elongate the second mirror to accommodate beam spot movement. This configuration enables the combination and injection of two angularly offset laser beam sources into the horizontal axis mirror to effectively double angular scan coverage. With two or more beams spatially combined and time interleaved, an increased effective scanning rate or an increased number of accumulated pulses per measurement dwell point can be achieved.
Continuing with above-described example, two or more laser sources may be collimated to produce low divergence beams which are directed with an angular offset in the plane perpendicular to the rotation axis of a single axis scanning mirror. An innovative optical system based on an Offner-type mirror system may project the two angularly deviated beams off of the first scanning mirror onto a second MEMS mirror. At the second mirror, the two deviated beams may converge onto a single spot while preserving the initial angular beam deviation with an added angular offset produced from the rotation of the first steering mirror. Optionally, the optical power of each injected beam can be doubled by the combination of two lasers with orthogonal polarization states. An added benefit of a consistent beam spot location on the second mirror is the option to incorporate a field expansion optic after the second scan mirror to expand the field of coverage in more than one axis.
The Offner configuration may be modified by revolving the cross-sections shown in
In some embodiments, laser B may be similarly collimated by second lens 710, but laser B beam polarization may be rotated 90 degrees by beam rotator 732 to make its beam polarization orthogonal to laser A. Laser B beam may be rotated 90 degrees using a MEMS horizontal steering mirrors 714, passing laser B beam on to polarization beam combiner 712 where laser A and laser B intersect. Laser B beam may pass through polarization beam combiner 712 un-deviated and on to MEMS horizontal steering mirrors 714.
In the diagram, below first transmitter 702, second transmitter 716 may produce a second laser beam (second beam 720) output comprising two combined beams as described in first transmitter 702 above. In some embodiments, second transmitter 716 may be identical or similar to first transmitter 702, such that, second beam 720 is the same or similar to first beam 718. However, in some embodiments, second beam 720 may enter MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714 with an angular offset to first beam 718.
In some embodiments, first beam 718 and second beam 720 may incident on MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714 having an angular offset of approximately 30 degrees. In some embodiments, the angular offset may be more, or less than 30 degrees depending on optimal performance and use case. MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714 may be approximately a 1 mm diameter mirror and may be oriented to deflect the beams symmetrically relative to the center axis of the Offner-type relay optic assembly described above. MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714 can comprise electrostatic, piezoelectric, or magnetic actuation and the drive signal may have a maximum frequency content roughly an octave below the natural resonance of MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714. At maximum deviation, MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714 may rotate approximately +/−8 degrees corresponding to an approximate +/−16-degree maximum angular deviation from nominal beam angle. Reflected beam A 722 and reflected beam B 723 off of MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714 passes through relay optic 724 which reimages transmit beam 726 onto a fixed location on second MEMS mirror (vertical axis MEMS mirror 728), which marks a location of the exit aperture and, in some embodiments, may be a silicon micro-electro-mechanical system mirror. Vertical axis MEMS mirror 728 may be driven with an analog modulated linear ramp or sawtooth scan pattern.
In some embodiments, position feedback may be used for closed loop linearization of mirror movement for any mirrors including MEMS horizontal steering mirror 714 and vertical axis MEMS mirror 728. Because signaling ramp behavior may be relatively slow for the vertical axis, movement of the lidar system platform can produce significant errors in the vertical position of horizontal scan lines, and to a lesser extent skew in the edge of the horizontal, over the duration of each ½ cycle of the linear ramp. To correct for this scanning error at high frequencies, MEMS based Gyro rate information can be integrated in MEMS controller 730 to estimate shifts in the vertical and horizontal frame of reference. In some embodiments, low-cost rate MEMS based accelerometers and/or gyros may be used to monitor orientation.
In some embodiments, relay assembly 800 comprises beam 816 being highly collimated (low divergence) and entering the system restricted to the z-y plane. This simplification allows the elimination of curvature along the x-axis of the concave cylindrical optic 804 due to the formation of an image rather than the need to pass a converging ray bundle. The small image spot diameter at the point of concave cylindrical optic 804 in relay assembly 800 may practically eliminate the impact of optical power at that point because the amount of curvature is negligible over the diameter of the spot image. Generally, the same can be true along the rotated extruded axis of convex spherical mirror 802, except the surface may need to be tangent to beam 816 to follow a reciprocal path back to the spherical reflector at reflector location 836. The combination of an effectively high f-number of the small diameter beam 816 entering through entrance aperture 814 and the reciprocal path created by the two passes off the spherical primary (convex spherical mirror 802), may effectively eliminate lower order optical aberrations. Residual optical aberration due to the geometrically uncompensated curvature of the extracted cylindrical secondary is corrected by the small amount of power experienced by the beam after passing though the transparent outer edges of the optic (e.g., concave cylindrical optic 804).
Typical MEMS mirrors can only mechanically scan +/−8 degrees corresponding to +/−16 degrees optical beam swing. A configuration for transmit scanner 900 of the lidar scanning system described herein is shown in a representative mechanical assembly in
In some embodiments, as shown in
The high-power configuration for the transmit scanner 900 is shown with four lasers, two on each side of the unit. Each pair of lasers are modulated together, with one of the two laser packages rotated by 90 degrees so that their polarized outputs can be combined using a reflective polarization combiner. The polarization power combiner film 910 may be mounted at a 45-degree angle directly above the laser to the far right in the side view of
Primary reflector 912 on the bottom of transmit scanner 900 and partially reflective second lens 914 above, may be mounted in a metal frame to maintain relatively tight position and tilt tolerances. In some embodiments, the present glass optics with metal frame can be replaced with snap together plastic assembly. A plastic assembly appears suitable due to the thermal expansion of the supporting structure compensating conveniently for the change in curvature of the mirror surfaces.
The use of linear scanning mirrors in both axes allows flexibility in the generation of a variety of scan patterns, each optimized for a different field of coverage requirement. For a rectangular uniform illumination field of coverage, a raster scan pattern may be desired. For the raster scan, two or more beams in the horizontal axis may be an advantage. However, once transmit scanner 900 is applied to a specific application, it may be desirable to modify the field pattern, possibly requiring the return to a single laser output beam, thus returning to a square maximum field of coverage.
In the examples spiral scan 1100 and distorted raster scan 1102, the linear bandwidth of the scanner mirrors may be limited to 400 Hz based on the use of the ST-microelectronics linear mirror as discussed above. The patterns shown may be optimized so that the scan rate decreases as the scan moves upward in elevation in the vertical Y-axis as shown in
Embodiments above describe directly expanding one axis of the square field of coverage using two identical or approximately identical mirrors. While injecting two or more lasers into the horizontal axis is an efficient way to expand coverage, its practicality is reduced once the required scan axis is increased to angles greater than +/−30 degrees. Above that scanning range, scanning efficiency may drop off (output angle deviation in relation to mirror steering angle) resulting in increasing levels of field distortion. To obtain field expansion in one or both axes up to 180 degrees, a field expanding optic can be added after the scanner. The use of an external field expanding optic may be used because the output beam of the transmit scanner 700 appears to originate at a single pivot point rather than shifting in position with horizontal axis rotation.
In embodiments described above it was advantageous to use two identical linear MEMS scanning mirrors in order to provide a relatively low scanning rate in the horizontal axis. In some embodiments, the elongated mirror geometry may not be necessary, but there may be no choice in using the elongated mirror geometry because the elongated mirror geometry may be designed for use as the slower vertical axis mirror when paired with a 1.4 mm diameter resonate mirror discussed in the background section. In some embodiments, a resonate mirror may be used as the first horizontal scanning element with single or multiple beams. Use of a smaller linear actuated MEMS mirror with a higher self-resonance frequency could provide higher bandwidth in one or both axes allowing faster frame coverage and the generation of a more parallel raster scan in the horizontal axis due to the possibility of operating the vertical axis in more of a stepwise fashion.
Although current disclosure has been described with reference to the embodiments illustrated in the attached drawing figures, it is noted that equivalents may be employed, and substitutions made herein without departing from the scope of the disclosure as recited in the claims.
Having thus described various embodiments, what is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent includes the following.
This non-provisional patent application claims priority benefit, with regard to all common subject matter, of earlier-filed U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/482,831, filed Feb. 2, 2023, and entitled “LIDAR LASER SCANNING SYSTEM.” The identified earlier-filed provisional patent application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present application.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63482831 | Feb 2023 | US |