This invention relates to a putter-type golf club head with increased geometric size, increased moment of inertia, increased sole area, lie angle adjustability and decreased loft. Herein use of the word “putter” is intended to refer particularly to head of the putter.
Generally, increasing geometric size (linear dimensions) increases the moment of inertia for a putter head of a given mass. Herein, references to “moment of inertia” (MOI) relate to mass properties. Increasing moment of inertia increases the stability of the putter at impact and increased stability is desirable in a putter. A force is exerted on both a golf club and a golf ball when the club hits the ball. If the hit is slightly off-center (e.g., the center of mass of the golf club head is not directly behind the point on the golf club face where the club strikes the ball), then the forces will cause the golf club to twist slightly. The twisting of the golf club leads to the ball not traveling in the direction intended by the player or not rolling smoothly. Additionally, less energy is imparted to the golf ball when the putter twists. This commonly causes off-center hits to fall short of their intended target. Increasing the moment of inertia of the putter head decreases the tendency for the putter head to twist when hitting the ball.
The “loft” of a putter is generally understood to be the deviation of the plane of contact on a putter face from a vertical plane (the putter shaft being in the vertical plane). The standard loft on putters has decreased dramatically over time as golf greens have become better groomed and much faster than in previous times. Putters' lofts in earlier times have been as high as 7 degrees. A loft of about three or four degrees is standard today. Loft on putter faces causes the golf ball to leave the putter face with an upward trajectory and with backspin. This backspin causes the ball to skid and bounce before it later begins to roll smoothly. Reducing loft will reduce backspin, skidding and bouncing.
The standard lie angle of putters today is about 20 degrees from vertical. The “lie angle” here follows the common understanding of the term: the angle of the shaft from the vertical (in a plane perpendicular to the intended direction of travel of the ball in play) when the putter head is placed in its intended attitude on the ground. The sole (bottom face) of most putters is curved raising both the toe and heal of the putter off of the ground when the putter is soled at its center. Testing has confirmed that most golfers are using a putter with too little lie angle causing the toe of the putter to be further raised when the ball is addressed. Golf professionals seem to prefer slightly more upright putters than the general golfing public and golf club manufacturers have designed their putters with professional golfers. Most golf putter manufacturers have been unwilling to provide custom lie angles for their putter offerings; and pro shops and retailers have been similarly unwilling to stock all of the putters of every single model in multiple lie angles. The result is that most golfers are playing with a putter that is slightly too upright and the consequence of this poorly fitted putter is that the toe is most commonly slightly raised off the ground and the heal of the putter is soled on the ground. Herein the use of the word “sole” as a verb means to place the putter on or adjacent a playing surface in an attitude to strike a ball as intended.
With the putter toe in the air the loft of most putter faces will cause the ball to start to left of the actual aim line of the putter (for right-handed golfers). Because of this most golfers have subliminally learned to aim slightly to the right of their intended target and then the loft of the toe high putter pulls the putt back onto the intended line. The loft on a toe high putter also induces unwanted spin on the ball. Decreasing the loft of a putter decreases the problems associated with a toe high-lofted putter. Eliminating all loft on the putter eliminates the problem entirely.
The curved sole design of most putters makes them very difficult to sole on the ground accurately and consistently. A flat sole of significant area will allow the golfer to more consistently align the putter.
In light of the above, there is a need for a putter with decreased loft, higher moment of inertia and adjustable lie angle.
The present invention provides a golf putter wherein the putter lie angle is infinitely variably adjustable over a range, the putter's area of contact with the ground is maximized, and the moment of inertia is increased from the conventional and adjustable.
The inventive putter includes a mechanism for adjusting the angle of the handle relative to the putter head in order to allow for variation of the lie angle of the putter in use. At the same time, the mass moment of inertia of the putter head is adjustable by adding or removing discrete weights to the putter head while maintaining inertia balance. Placement of the weights, at the extremes of the toe and heel ends of the putter head, provides a maximum of effect on inertia.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention there is provided a putter head for a golf putter, which includes a head, a shaft receiver, a shaft and removable weights. A shaft receiver disc is positioned within the disc cavity in the putter head. The disc can rotate together with a shaft in place and be fixed at an infinite number of incremental positions by tightening screws attaching the disc compression cover to the back of the putter head. The disc can be further secured by tightening the set screws bearing against the disc in the bottom of the putter head. The range of rotation can be restricted to positions allowed (by regulation or any other criteria) by the insertion of a rotation stop pin inserted in the disc.
Alternatively, in one configuration of the preferred embodiment, the shaft receiver disc and shaft can be removed from the disc cavity in the putter head and reversed in orientation and reinserted in the disc cavity in the reversed orientation to provide a left-handed putter.
In the preferred embodiment the putter head is further comprised of weights attached to the toe and heal of the putter head. The weight and moment of inertia of the putter head can be adjusted by adding or removing weights or by changing the size and weight of weight attachments. The additional weight may be attached to the rear of base weights. In the preferred embodiment, putter head has a mass in the range of 300 grams to 650 grams. Preferably, the putter is made of a lightweight metal such as aluminum or similar metal and the weights are made of the same lightweight metal or alternatively from a heavier metal.
Alternatively, the putter may be formed of any of a number of plastic materials or composites or other lightweight materials.
A number of advantages of the inventive lie-adjustable high MOI putter include: affording a higher moment of inertia for its weight and a higher moment of inertia compared to other putters of any weight, providing for low loft angle and a very large flat sole area. The current putter can be adjusted to the lie angle that best fits any individual amateur or professional golfer. The current putter can be changed from right handed to left handed. Other benefits and novel aspects of the inventive design will be clear from the following description of specific embodiments and from the accompanying drawing figures.
The following description relates to the embodiment illustrated in
The first embodiment of the putter head is illustrated as
The shaft 11 is comprised of a hollow tube and a grip 18. A hollow tube potion of shaft 11 in a preferred embodiment is made of steel tubing, but may be made of graphite or other composite material. The shaft 11 may be of generally conventional design and construction except as detailed here.
The shaft receiver disc 12, putter head blade 13, disc compression cover 16, base weight cylinders 14, the additional weight cylinders 15 and the alignment pin 17 are preferably made of aluminum, but may be made of another metal. Alternatively, these elements may be formed of plastic or composite or other lightweight material having appropriate properties.
The grip 18 in a preferred embodiment is a standard golf putter grip, but may have any golf putter grip configuration and construction, particularly those sanctioned by governing bodies such as the USGA (United States Golf Association).
The putter face 36 is preferably planar, but may bulge forward (outward) in a convex curve. The putter face 36 forms the operative leading contact face of the putter head, whereby a golf ball is struck when a user performs a putting stroke. The putter face 36 is most preferably vertical with no loft, and preferably have a loft in the range of zero to two degrees. However, the other benefits of the inventive putter will be appreciated with greater loft angles.
The putter head blade 13, disk cavity 21 and shaft receiver disc 12 should be configured to provide for a lie angle of the putter of any angle in the range of ten degrees to 26 degrees from vertical. These two angle orientations are shown in
The shaft disc assembly 20 in a preferred embodiment is configured to enable it to be removed from the disc cavity 21, reversed in orientation (rotated about the shaft), and reinserted into the disc cavity 21 to change a right-handed putter into a left-handed putter.
The putter head blade 13 in a preferred embodiment has an overall length dimension from 5 inches to 7 inches long from the toe end 81 to heal end 82. The base weight cylinders 14 in a preferred embodiment are from one inches to two inches in diameter, based on the need to blend with the overall size and shape of the putter head blade 13. The overall depth of the putter from the putter face 36 to the back of the base weight cylinder or the additional weight cylinder may be in the range of 1.125 inches to 4.00 inches, although this dimension is not limiting on the inventive aspects.
The assembled putter head 10 in a preferred embodiment has a total weight of from 300 grams to 650 grams depending on the combination of base weight cylinders and additional weight cylinders utilized.
With particular reference now to
A high moment of inertia is obtained in the present inventive device through an extreme configuration of weights added to the head blade 13. Base weight cylinders 14 and additional weight cylinders 15 are secured to the head blade 13 at the extreme toe and heel ends 81, 82 of the head blade 13 to maximize their distance from the blade center and the intended point of contact in use. To maximize mass at these locations, the weight cylinders 14, 15 extend orthogonally outward from the back of the blade 13. This enables a high inertia while maintaining a useful total weight for a putter head.
the base weight cylinder 14 has female threads which are threaded into the male threads of the attachment stud 42. The base weight cylinder 14 is tightened into a fixed position on the attachment stud 42 against the back of the putter head blade 13. The base weight cylinder 14 may be optionally further secured by means of epoxy or other liquid applied gluing agent. The additional weight cylinders 15 are attached to the base weight cylinder 14 by means of the weight cylinder attachment screw 52 (
Alternative shapes and sizes of the weight cylinders 14, 15 are contemplated and may be used with similar effect and function. The cylindrical shape is advantageous for multiple reasons including maximizing the mass at the extreme extent of the blade 13 while providing a smooth outline. Similarly, the method and mechanism of securing the cylinders 14, 15 to the blade 13 may be altered or replaced by others providing the same function.
With reference to
With particular reference to
With particular reference to
The shaft receiver disc 12 is retained in the disc cavity 21 by the disc compression cover 16. The disc compression cover 16 is secured into place in the disc compression cover seat 61 by means of four disc compression cover attachment screws 64. The shaft receiver disc 12 is at least 0.003″ thicker that the depth of the disc cavity 21. This difference in dimensions causes the disc compression cover 16 to bind the circumferential edge of the shaft receiver disc 12. The disc compression cover 16 is thin enough to bend by the force of the four disc compression cover attachment screws 64 applied at four corners of the disc compression cover 16. This warping of the disc compression cover 16 reduces the frictional pressure on the rear surface of the shaft receiver disc 12 while at the same time increasing the frictional binding pressure at the circumferential edge of the shaft receiver disc 12. The shaft receiver disc 12 is pinched in place at its edge rather than being restrained from rotation by simple surface friction. This is illustrated in
A function of the compression cover 16 is to provide a device and means of providing adjustable frictional constraint to relative rotation of the disc 12 within the cavity 21. This enables user adjustment of the lie angle as described in the following.
During an adjustment of the lie angle of the putter, the disc compression cover attachment screws 64 are partially loosened to allow rotation of the shaft receiver disc 12 in the shaft disc cavity 21. This allows controlled rotation of the disc 12 while maintaining its location within the cavity 21. When the desired lie angle is determined and established, the disc compression cover attachment screws can be tightened which eliminates rotation. Once the disc compression cover 16 is secured, set screws 35 located in the bottom of the putter blade 13 can be tightened. With both the set screws 35 and disc compression cover attachment screws 64 fully tightened the shaft receiver disc can no longer rotate at all and the lie angle is locked.
Together, the disc compression cover 16 and the screws 35 provide attachment means that provide adjustable and also rigid securing of the shaft 11 to the blade 13. Other devices and mechanisms that provide the same or equal function and result are contemplated and further devices and mechanism may become obvious to those skilled in the art or be developed in the further.
Accordingly, the invention includes putter embodiments having:
Two alignment indicia 90, 91 are used to provide visual alignment cues to a user. Each is secured to the top of one of the base weight cylinders 14 in a common manner and particular location relative to the head face 36. The two alignment indicia 90, 91 are configured, located and secured such that during appropriate placement of the putter in use, the alignment indicia 90, 91 have a common vertical visual projection. This visual projection should be visually contrasting with respect to all other elements of the putter head 10. This may be accomplished by using contrasting colors, preferably with the alignment indicia 90, 91 having either a white or light metallic color and the other elements having darker surface color. The alignment indicia 90, 91 should be located a common distance rearward from the plane of the head face 36 and symmetrically distanced on the two sides (toe-ward and heel-ward) of the intended strike point on the head face 36. The vertical projection of the alignment indicia 90, 91 is preferably circular and approximately with a diameter equal that of a regulation golf ball—typically about 1.7 inches, although somewhat smaller and larger diameters will function similarly. The vertical projection may be formed of a circular horizontal planar surface of the alignment indicia as shown in the figures, or other surface shapes appearing circular in vertical projection.
Using the alignment indicia 90, 91 as described, a user looking downward onto the inventive putter head 10, that is aligned with a golf ball in preparation of striking it, is induced to see and coordinate in their mind the location of the 90, 91 with the golf ball. Due to the symmetric location of the alignment indicia 90, 91 and their clearly discerned location, the user will naturally align the putter head 10 in the desired orientation: with the putter face 36 perpendicular to the desired golf ball travel path.
Each alignment indicia 90, 91 preferably has a concave cylindrical backside face to mate with the curved perimeter sides of the base weight cylinders as shown. Preferably, the each alignment indicia 90, 91 would be weightless to eliminate influence on the mass properties of the head 10. Toward this goal, the alignment indicia 90, 91 should be formed of very light weight material that is also resistant to weathering. Low density metals such as aluminum or plastics may be used. Each balancing saddle weight is preferably secured permanently to a respective base weight cylinder 14 using permanent adhesive or equivalent material, device or mechanism.
A second feature for controlling the angular orientation of the disc 112 are two rigid stops in the form of set screws 114 that each extend from the body of the head 10 and into the disc cavity 21 towards the control surface 115. The function of the set screws 114 is to provide a positive interference with the control surface 115 to prevent rotation of the alternative disc 112 when in an adjusted fixed condition. The particulars of the position and length of the set screw 114 may vary and depend on the specific geometry of the control surface 115. In use, the alternative disc 112 is located in the desired rotational position, aided by the cooperating control surface 115 and set screws 114, and then secured for use in the same manner as detailed previously. Because each set screw 114 is adjustable, the angular orientation of the alternative disc 112 may be set or limited at a variety of different positions.
Other configurations and devices for accomplishing the same or equivalent inventive functions and results as described in the above examples are contemplated and will be discernable from the above discussion and the teachings herein.
This is a nonprovisional application is a continuation-in-part of the U.S. application Ser. No. 14/600,034 filed Jan. 20, 2015 that claims benefit of the filing of the provisional application filed on May 15, 2013 and having Application No. 61/823,860 and further claims benefit from international application PCT/US14/37107 filed on May 7, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1643250 | Longsworth | Sep 1927 | A |
3096982 | Bassin | Jul 1963 | A |
3214170 | Warnock | Oct 1965 | A |
4735414 | Williams | Apr 1988 | A |
4881737 | Mullins | Nov 1989 | A |
5244205 | Melanson | Sep 1993 | A |
5415399 | Kettelson | May 1995 | A |
5429356 | Dingle | Jul 1995 | A |
5628697 | Gamble | May 1997 | A |
5716287 | Levocz | Feb 1998 | A |
5863257 | Busnardo | Jan 1999 | A |
5888148 | Allen | Mar 1999 | A |
5890973 | Gamble | Apr 1999 | A |
5921871 | Fisher | Jul 1999 | A |
5924938 | Hines | Jul 1999 | A |
6142884 | Yim | Nov 2000 | A |
6203444 | McRae | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6435976 | Galliers | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6527649 | Neher | Mar 2003 | B1 |
20060264264 | Sandino | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090170628 | Yoon | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20140024473 | Reid | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140378243 | Sanyal | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170014689 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61823860 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14600034 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15278176 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2014/037107 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 14600034 | US |