The present document incorporates by reference the entire contents of Japanese priority document, 2005-346301 filed in Japan on Nov. 30, 2005.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an image forming system that includes a device mounted with a plurality of components, and a lifetime management device that calculates and manages information on service life of the components.
2. Description of the Related Art
When a failure occurs in a part of various types of devices, depending on the type of the part, the device cannot be used until the part is replaced by a new one, and this imposes inconvenience on a user.
On the other hand, there have been lifetime management devices, which calculate remaining lifetime of parts mounted on a device based on operation record of the device or the parts, and issue a request for replacement of the parts based on the calculation result. An image forming system disclosed in, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-76223 includes this type of lifetime management device, which measures as operation record the amount of operation by a printing mechanism of a device or an image forming apparatus. The conventional lifetime management device then calculates remaining lifetime of a photoconductor, a part of the image forming apparatus, based on the measurement result, and requests replacement of the part based on the calculation result. In response to the request, a replacement worker, such as a service person, is sent to replace the part before a failure occurs, which reduces the downtime of the device.
In the conventional technology, however, maintenance is not always effectively planned. That is, when a replacement request is issued for a certain part of a device, a determination on presence or absence of the replacement request may be made by a user with a determining unit mounted on the device, or by a maintenance service agency with a determining unit connected to the device via a communication line. In the former case, the replacement request is reported to the maintenance service agency by a telephone call from the user or a replacement request signal received from the device via the communication line. In response to the replacement request, the maintenance service agency dispatches a replacement worker to the user to replace the part. Thus, downtime of the device can be prevented. However, there can be a case that, although one part has been replaced, a replacement request for another part can be issued a few days later. In such a case, a replacement worker is dispatched repeatedly to the same user in a short period of time.
It is an object of the present invention to at least partially solve the problems in the conventional technology.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a lifetime management device that manages lifetime of a device and components mounted on the device, includes a measuring unit that measures an operation amount of the device and each of the components, a calculating unit that calculates remaining lifetime of each of the components based on the operation amount and a lifetime index, a determining unit that determines whether each of the components needs to be replaced based on the remaining lifetime and a replacement index, and an order-time determining unit that determines a time to order replacement of one of the components that needs to be replaced based on the remaining lifetime of other components that do not need to be replaced yet.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a lifetime management device that manages lifetime of a device and components mounted on the device, includes a measuring unit that measures an operation amount of the device and each of the components, a calculating unit that calculates remaining lifetime of each of the components based on the operation amount and a lifetime index, a determining unit that determines whether each of the components needs to be replaced based on the remaining lifetime and a replacement index, and an order-time determining unit that determines a time to order replacement of a first component from among the components that does not need to be replaced yet based on the remaining lifetime of the first component and a time to order replacement of a second component from among the components that needs to be replaced.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, an image forming system includes an image forming apparatus that forms an image on a recording medium and includes a plurality of components, and a lifetime management device that manages lifetime of the components mounted on the image forming apparatus. The lifetime management device includes a measuring unit that measures an operation amount of the image forming apparatus and each of the components, a calculating unit that calculates remaining lifetime of each of the components based on the operation amount and a lifetime index, a determining unit that determines whether each of the components needs to be replaced based on the remaining lifetime and a replacement index, and an order-time determining unit that determines a time to order replacement of one of the components that needs to be replaced based on the remaining lifetime of other components that do not need to be replaced yet.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, an image forming system includes an image forming apparatus that forms an image on a recording medium and includes a plurality of components, and a lifetime management device that manages lifetime of the components mounted on the image forming apparatus. The lifetime management device includes a measuring unit that measures an operation amount of the image forming apparatus and each of the components, a calculating unit that calculates remaining lifetime of each of the components based on the operation amount and a lifetime index, a determining unit that determines whether each of the components needs to be replaced based on the remaining lifetime and a replacement index, and an order-time determining unit that determines a time to order replacement of a component from among the components that does not need to be replaced yet based on the remaining lifetime thereof and a time to order replacement of another component from among the components that needs to be replaced.
The above and other objects, features, advantages and technical and industrial significance of this invention will be better understood by reading the following detailed description of presently preferred embodiments of the invention, when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are explained below with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the embodiments, the present invention is applied to an image forming system that includes an electrophotographic printer (hereinafter, “printer”).
A basic configuration of a printer as an image forming apparatus of an image forming system according to a first embodiment is explained first referring to
The photoconductor unit 2Y includes a photosensitive drum 3Y as a latent image carrier, a drum cleaning unit 4Y, a discharger (not shown), a charger 5Y.
The developing unit 7Y includes a first developer container 9Y including a first screw 8Y therein. The developing unit 7Y further includes a second developer container 14Y including a density sensor consisting of a permeability sensor (hereinafter, density sensor) 10Y, a second screw 11Y, a developing roller 12Y, and a doctor blade 13Y. The first and second developer containers contain a Y developer (not shown) including a magnetic carrier and a negatively charged Y toner. The first screw 8Y is rotated by the drive unit (not shown) to convey the Y developer in the first developer container 9Y from front to back in a direction perpendicular to the drawing. The Y developer passes through an opening (not shown) on a partition between the first and second developer containers 9Y and 14Y to enter the second developer container 14Y.
The second screw 11Y in the second developer container 14Y is rotated by the drive unit (not shown) to transport the Y developer from back to front in
A permeability detection result of the Y developer by the density sensor 10Y is sent to a controller (not shown) as a voltage signal. The permeability of the Y developer correlates with the Y toner density of the Y developer, and the density sensor 10Y outputs a voltage of a value corresponding to the Y toner density. The controller includes a random access memory (RAM), which stores Y Vtref, i.e., a target value of an output voltage from the density sensor 10Y, and data of C Vtref, M Vtref, and K Vtref, i.e., target values of the output voltage from the C, M, and K density sensors mounted on other developing units 7C, 7M, and 7K. The developing unit 7Y compares a value of the output voltage from the density sensor 10Y with the Y Vtref, and drives a Y toner supply unit for time corresponding to the comparison result. Due to this drive, an adequate amount of Y toner is supplied to the Y developer, in which the Y toner has been consumed due to development and the toner density has decreased, by the first developer container 9Y. Accordingly, the Y toner density of the Y developer in the second developer container 14Y is maintained in a predetermined range. The same toner supply control is performed with respect to the developer in the process units (1C, 1M, 1K) for other colors.
The Y toner image formed on the photosensitive drum 3Y is intermediately transferred onto an intermediate transfer belt. The drum cleaning unit 4Y in the photoconductor unit 2Y removes remaining toner on the surface of the photosensitive drum 3Y, having subjected to the intermediate transfer process. The surface of the photosensitive drum 3Y having subjected to the cleaning process is discharged by the discharger (not shown). Due to the discharge, the surface of the photosensitive drum 3Y is initialized and prepared for the next image formation. In
An optical write unit 20 is arranged below the process units 1Y, 1C, 1M, and 1K in
A first paper feed cassette 31 and a second paper feed cassette 32 are arranged below the optical write unit 20, to be overlapped on each other in a vertical direction. Recording paper P is stored in these paper feed cassettes in a state of paper stack in which plural sheets of the recording paper are piled, and a first paper feed roller 31a and a second paper feed roller 32a contact the top sheet of the recording paper P. When the first paper feed roller 31a is rotated counterclockwise in
A resist roller pair 35 is arranged at the end of the paper feed path 33. Upon insertion of the recording paper P fed from the carrier roller pair 34 between the rollers, the resist roller pair 35 temporarily stops the rotation of the rollers. The recording paper P is then fed to a secondary transfer nip (described later) at an appropriate timing.
Above the process units 1Y, 1C, 1M, and 1K is arranged a transfer unit 40 that endlessly moves an intermediate transfer belt 41 counterclockwise in
The secondary transfer backup roller 46 puts the intermediate transfer belt 41 between a secondary transfer roller 50 arranged outside of the loop of the intermediate transfer belt 41 and the secondary transfer backup roller 46, to form a secondary transfer nip. The resist roller pair 35 forwards the recording paper P put between the rollers toward the secondary transfer nip at a timing synchronized with the four-color toner image on the intermediate transfer belt 41. The four-color toner image on the intermediate transfer belt 41 is secondarily batch-transferred onto the recording paper P in the secondary transfer nip, due to an influence of a secondary transfer field formed between the secondary transfer roller 50 and the secondary transfer backup roller 46, to which a secondary transfer bias is applied, and a nip pressure. The four-color toner image becomes a full color toner image, coupled with white of the recording paper P.
Residual toner, which has not been transferred to the recording paper P, adheres on the intermediate transfer belt 41 after having passed through the secondary transfer nip. The transfer residual toner is cleaned by the-belt cleaning unit 42. In the belt cleaning unit 42, a cleaning blade 42a contacts the front face of the intermediate transfer belt 41, thereby scraping and removing the residual toner on the belt.
A fixing unit 60 is arranged above the secondary transfer nip in
The temperature sensor 67 is arranged to face the front face of the fixing belt 64 via a predetermined gap, outside of the loop of the fixing belt 64, and detects a surface temperature of the fixing belt 64 immediately before approaching the fixing nip. The detection result is transmitted to a fixing power source circuit (not shown). The fixing power source circuit controls on/off of power supply relative to the heat source 63a contained in the heating roller 63 and the heat source 61a contained in the pressurizing heating roller 61. Accordingly, the surface temperature of the fixing belt 64 is maintained at about 140 degrees.
In
The recording paper P having subjected to the fixing process in this manner passes through the rollers of a paper ejection roller pair 69 and ejected to the outside of the machine. A stack unit 68 is formed on the upper face of the housing of the printer, and the recording paper P ejected to the outside of the machine by the paper ejection roller pair 69 is sequentially stacked in the stack unit 68.
Four toner cartridges 100Y, 100C, 100M, and 100K for storing the Y, C, M, and K toners are arranged above the transfer unit 40. The Y, C, M, and K toners in the toner cartridges 100Y, 100C, 100M, and 100K are appropriately supplied to the developing units 7Y, 7C, 7M, and 7K in the process units 1Y, 1C, 1M, and 1K. These toner cartridges 100Y, 100C, 100M, and 100K can be attached to or detached from the printer, separately from the process units 1Y, 1C, 1M, and 1K.
A nozzle receiving port 109Y is formed at the end of the holder part 102Y in a bottle axial direction. The nozzle receiving port 109Y is for receiving a suction nozzle fixed on the printer side. Pin receiving ports 110Y having a slightly smaller diameter than that of the nozzle receiving port are formed on both sides of the nozzle receiving port 109Y in
When the toner cartridge 100Y is to be set on a cartridge mounting base of the toner supply unit, at first, an opening/closing door (not shown) on a side of the printer is opened so that the cartridge mounting base in the toner supply unit is exposed. On the cartridge mounting base, four depressions in a semi-cylindrical shape are provided in parallel,. for mounting four toner cartridges for Y, C, M, and K in parallel. An operator holds the toner cartridge 100Y with the holder part 102Y directed to the front. The operator then puts the holder part 102Y at the end of a depression for Y, of four semi-cylindrical depressions provided on the cartridge mounting base, and slides the cartridge along the rotation axis of the bottle part to insert the entire cartridge. The operator pushes the toner cartridge 100Y to a predetermined position by this sliding movement, and sets the toner cartridge 100Y on the cartridge mounting base.
The two positioning pins 75Y in the cartridge connecting portion 71Y in the toner supply unit are fixed such that the point thereof protrudes than the point of the suction nozzle 73Y. The point thereof is more tapered than the rear end. During the insertion of the toner cartridge in the cartridge mounting base at the time of setting the toner cartridge, the tapered points of the two positioning pins 75Y respectively enter into the two pin receiving ports 110Y of the toner cartridge 100Y shown in
After such positioning is performed, when the toner cartridge 100Y is further inserted, the suction nozzle 73Y in the cartridge connecting portion 71Y enters into the nozzle receiving port 109Y in the holder-part 102Y. Setting of the toner cartridge 100Y is complete at a point in time when the suction nozzle 73Y is pushed into an insertion path (115Y) extending inside of the nozzle receiving port 109Y.
The thus set toner cartridge 100Y makes a gear portion 111Y formed at the point of the bottle part 101Y engage with the drive transmission gear (not shown) fixed in the toner supply unit. When the drive transmission gear is rotated, the bottle part 101Y rotates, while being held by the holder part 102Y. Due to this rotation, the Y toner in the bottle part 011Y is carried from the rear end toward the point of the bottle, and flows into the holder part 102Y.
The suction pump is connected to an area (not shown) of the flow tube 72Y connected to the suction nozzle 73Y, and air and the toner in the flow tube 72Y are sucked due to the operation thereof. The suction force is transmitted to the holder part 102Y through the flow tube 72Y and the suction nozzle 73Y. The Y toner in the holder part 102Y is then sucked into the suction nozzle 73Y, and supplied to the developing unit 7Y in the process unit 1Y.
While the toner cartridge 100Y for storing the Y toner has been explained in detail, the toner cartridges for other colors (100C, 100M, and 100K) have the same configuration.
On the side of the printer housing (not shown), the opening/closing door for replacing the cartridge is provided, and when this door is opened, the toner supply unit 70 in the housing is exposed on the inner side of
A connecting unit support plate 79 for supporting the four cartridge connecting portions 71Y, 71C, 71M, and 71K is arranged in a standing condition at one end of the cartridge mounting base 77. The suction nozzles of the cartridge connecting portions 71Y, 71C, 71M, and 71K are respectively inserted into a nozzle insertion passage (not shown) in the toner cartridges 100Y, 100C, 100M, and 100K mounted on the cartridge mounting base 77. The suction pumps 78Y, 78C, 78M, and 78K are coupled to the end of flow tubes 72Y, 72C, 72M, and 72K of the cartridge connecting portions 71Y, 71C, 71M, and 71K. A toner supply port E of each developing unit is positioned immediately below the respective suction pumps 78Y, 78C, 78M, and 78K. The Y, C, M, and K toners respectively discharged from the discharge part of the suction pumps 78Y, 78C, 78M, and 78K are supplied to the inside of the developing unit via the toner supply port of the corresponding developing unit. In
On the left side of the developing gears 122Y, 122C, 122M, and 122K, first relay gears 125Y, 125C, 125M, and 125K that slide and rotate while engaging with the fixed shaft (not shown) are arranged. These relay gears respectively engage with the second gears 124Y, 124C, 124M, and 124K of the developing gears 122Y, 122C, 122M, and 122K, and slide and rotate on the fixed shaft due to a rotation driving force from the developing gears 122Y, 122C, 122M, and 122K. The first relay gears 125Y, 125C, 125M, and 125K not only engage with the second gears 124Y, 124C, 124M, and 124K on a upstream side of a drive transmission direction, but also engage with clutch input gears 126Y, 126C, 126M, and 126K on a downstream side of the drive transmission direction. These clutch input gears 126Y, 126C, 126M, and 126K are respectively supported by developing clutches 127Y, 127C, 127M, and 127K. The developing clutches 127Y, 127C, 127M, and 127K transmit the rotation driving force to respective clutch shafts of the clutch input gears 126Y, 126C, 126M, and 126K, or make the clutch input gears 126Y, 126C, 126M, and 126K run idle, with on/off control of power supply by the controller (not shown). Clutch output gears 128Y, 128C, 128M, and 128K are respectively fixed on the point side of the clutch shafts of the developing clutches 127Y, 127C, 127M, and 127K. When the power is supplied to the developing clutches 127Y, 127C, 127M, and 127K, the rotation driving force of the clutch input gears 126Y, 126C, 126M, and 126K is transmitted to the clutch shafts, to rotate the clutch output gears 128Y, 128C, 128M, and 128K, respectively. On the other hand, when the power supply to the developing clutches 127Y, 127C, 127M, and 127K is cut off, even if the process drive motors 120Y, 120C, 120M, and 120K are rotating, since the clutch input gears 126Y, 126C, 126M, and 126K run idle on the clutch shafts, the rotation of the clutch output gears 128Y, 128C, 128M, and 128K stops.
Referring to
On the printer, the following drive transmission system is configured to correspond to the four process units. That is, the drive transmission system includes the process drive motor 120, the drive gear 121, the first gear 123 and the second gear 124 of the developing gear 122, the first relay gear 125, the clutch input gear 126, the clutch output gear 128, and the second relay gear 129, and the driving rotation force is transmitted in this order.
In a state that the process unit 1Y is set on the printer, the second relay gear 129Y shown in
While only the process unit 1Y has been explained with reference to the drawings, also in the process units for other colors, the rotation driving force is transmitted to the developing sleeve in the same manner.
In
Thus, the developing gear groups consisting of the drive gear 121, the developing gear 122, the first relay gear 125, the clutch-input gear 126, the clutch output gear 128, the second relay gear 129, the third relay gear-130, the sleeve upstream gear 131, the sleeve downstream gear, the second screw gear, and the first screw gear is formed in four sets, corresponding to the process units.
In
In each color, the developing gear can be driven by a developing motor different from that of the photoconductor gear. In this case, a driven distance D of the developing unit (i=5 to 8) can be calculated based on the driven time of the developing motor.
The process unit sensors 202Y, 202C, 202M, and 202K detect the process units 1Y, 1C, 1M, and 1K set in the printer, respectively, and output a detection signal to the controller 200.
The transfer unit sensor 203 detects the transfer unit 40 set in the printer and outputs a detection signal to the controller 200.
The secondary transfer-unit sensor 204 detects the secondary transfer unit formed of the secondary transfer roller 50 and the like set in the printer and outputs a detection signal to the controller 200.
The fixing unit sensor 211 detects the fixing unit 60 set in the printer and outputs a detection signal to the controller 200.
The print counter 205 counts the accumulated number of prints by the printer immediately after shipment from factory. The print counter 205 counts up the number of prints every time the printing operation is performed relative to one sheet of recording paper, and outputs a count-up signal to the controller 200. Further, the print counter 205 outputs a signal indicating the accumulated number of prints to the controller 200 in response to a request from the controller 200.
The operation display unit 206 includes a plurality of key switches and a touch panel (not shown), to convert an input operation relative to the key switches and the touch panel by the operator to an input signal, and output the input signal to the controller 200. Further, the operation display unit 206 displays an image based on a control signal from the controller 200 on the touch panel.
The modem 207 transmits a signal transmitted from the controller 200 to a remote apparatus via a telephone line (not shown).
The transfer belt motor 208 is a rotation driving source of the drive roller 47 in the transfer unit 40, and endlessly moves the intermediate transfer belt 41 with the rotation thereof.
The secondary transfer motor 209 is a rotation driving source of the secondary transfer roller 50 that contacts the front face of the intermediate transfer belt 41 to form the secondary transfer nip. The fixing motor 210 is a rotation driving source of the rollers and the fixing belt in the fixing unit 60.
The controller 200 detects detachment of the process units 1Y, 1C, 1M, and 1K relative to the printer, based on a combination of fall (OFF) and rise (ON) of the output signal from the process unit sensors 202Y, 202C, 202M, and 202K. The controller 200 detects detachment of the transfer unit 40 relative to the printer, based on the combination of fall and rise of the output signal from the transfer unit sensor 203. The controller 200 further detects detachment of the secondary transfer roller 50 relative to the printer, based on the combination of fall and rise of the output signal from the secondary transfer-unit sensor 204. Further, the controller 200 detects detachment of the fixing unit 60 relative to the printer, based on the combination of fall and rise of the output signal from the fixing unit sensor 211. The characteristic configuration of the image forming system is explained next.
Specifically, the lifetime management device includes an operation measuring unit that measures the operations of each of various types of parts mounted on the printer to be detected, a remaining lifetime calculator that calculates remaining lifetime of the respective parts based on the operation record and a predetermined lifetime index, a replacement-request determining unit that determines whether it is necessary to replace the respective parts based on the calculation result by the remaining lifetime calculator and the predetermined replacement index, and an order-timing determining unit (explained later). While the order-timing determining unit is provided in the remote monitoring device 600 in a maintenance service center, other units are provided in the printer. Details of the other units will be explained later.
In the maintenance service center, technicians highly skilled in failure diagnosis, inspection, and repair of the printer are at work, and the technician is dispatched to the user according to a request from each user. The printers A to P (501 to 516) include a function referred to as emergency call, and can transmit an emergency call signal including information of a failure content to the remote monitoring device 600 in the maintenance service center via the telephone line. The maintenance service center immediately dispatches the technician upon receiving the emergency call signal by the remote monitoring device 600.
The remote monitoring device 600 in the maintenance service center is connected to an order acceptance terminal 610 of a parts center. In the parts center, various parts of the printers are stocked, and replacement operators who can perform replacement work of these parts are assigned. The order acceptance terminal 610 in the parts center dispatches the replacement operator to the user together with the parts based on a replacement work request signal transmitted from the remote monitoring device 600 via the telephone line.
In
The lifetime management device in the image forming system manages service life information of photoconductor units (2Y, 2C, 2M, and 2K), the developing units (7Y, 7C, 7M, and 7K), Y, M, C, and K developers, the transfer unit (40), and the fixing unit (60) as parts in the printers.
Various variables shown in the following Table 1 are stored in the RAM 200b of the controller 200 in the printer.
In Table 1, unit operating time t(i) [days] is the operating time of each unit (including developer) after its replacement (elapsed time since replacement to the present); driven distance D(i) [mm] is the moving distance of each moving member (rollers and belt) in each unit after its replacement to the present; number of prints P(i) [sheets] is the number of prints after replacement of each unit to the present; lifetime driven distance Ld(i) [mm] is a lifetime index that is compared to the driven distance D(i) to determine the remaining lifetime of each unit (when the driven distance D(i) reaches the lifetime driven distance Ld(i), the unit is determined to be at the end of its service life); lifetime print volume Lp(i) [sheets] is the number of prints or sheets that can be printed during the lifetime of each unit, i.e., a lifetime index that is compared to the number of prints P(i) to determine the remaining lifetime of each unit (when the number of prints P(i) reaches the lifetime print volume Lp(i), the unit is determined to be at the end of its service life); distance remaining lifetime T1(i) [days] is a remaining lifetime based on a difference between the driven distance D(i) and the lifetime driven distance Ld(i); sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) [days] is a remaining lifetime based on a difference between the number of prints P(i) and the lifetime print volume Lp(i); unit remaining lifetime T3(i) [days] is shorter one of either the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) or the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i); and replacement index X(i) [days] is an index to determine whether to replace each unit.
Variables in these nine items are individually set for each-unit. The number of units in which the life information is managed is 16, that is, the four photoconductor units (2Y, 2C, 2M, and 2K), the four developing units (7Y, 7C, 7M, and 7K), Y, M, C, and K developers, the transfer unit 40, the belt cleaning unit 42, the secondary transfer unit, and the fixing unit 60. Accordingly, 144 variables (nine items×16) are set. In respective variables, (i) indicates the type of unit, and the value thereof and the unit type have a relationship shown in the following Table 2.
Among the variables of nine items, unit operating time t(i), driven distance D(i), number of prints P(i), distance remaining lifetime T1(i), sheet remaining lifetime T2(i), and unit-remaining lifetime T3(i) are specific values for each individual product of the unit. When the unit is replaced, an eigenvalue of the old unit must be changed to an eigenvalue of the new unit. Therefore, the controller 200 monitors detachment of the 16 units relative to the printer based on the output value from respective sensors, and when detachment of any unit is detected, the controller 200 performs a replacement inquiry process for the unit. Specically, when detachment of, for example, the process unit 1C is detected, the controller 200 inquires of the replacement operator whether the photoconductor unit 2C and the developing unit 7C have been replaced, according to a screen display on the operation display unit 206. When a response (a key input operation) from the replacement operator with respect to the inquiry is Yes for the photoconductor unit 2C, the controller 200 updates the C photoconductor unit operating time t(2), the driven distance D(2) of the C photoconductor unit, and the number of prints of the C photoconductor unit P(2) to zero. Further, the controller 200 resets the distance remaining lifetime T1(2), the sheet remaining lifetime T2(2), and the unit remaining lifetime T3(2) of the C photoconductor unit to predetermined initial values.
While replacement of the unit is ascertained based on detachment detection of the unit and the replacement inquiry processing, there is another method such that an IC chip that stores unit ID number is loaded on respective units and the unit ID number of each unit is monitored by the controller 200, to ascertain the replacement of the unit based on a change of the unit ID number.
Further, various variables can be reset by an input operation by the replacement operator who has replaced the unit on the operation display unit 206, instead of ascertaining the replacement of the unit by the controller 200. However, in this case, there is a possibility that the unit life information becomes inappropriate because the replacement operator forgets to perform a reset operation.
The controller 200 adds 1 to the unit operating time t(i) stored in the RAM 200b for respective units (including the developer) to update the unit operating time t(i) everyday at a predetermined time.
The driven distances D(i=1to 4) of the Y, C, M, and K photoconductor units are updated in the following manner. That is, a time from the start to the end of an operation is counted for the process drive motors 120Y, 120C, 120M, and 120K. On completion of time counting, the counting result is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to convert the photoconductor-unit driven time [sec] to the surface moving distance [mm] of the photosensitive drum, and the conversion result is added to the driven distances D(i=1 to 4) of the Y, C, M, and K photoconductor units up to that time.
The printer in the image forming system changes over a print speed mode between a high-speed print mode in which the photoconductors, rollers, and belts are driven at a relatively high speed so that priority is given to printing speed rather than image quality, and a low-speed print mode in which the photosensitive drums and the like are driven at a relatively low speed so that priority is given to the image quality rather than the printing speed. When the photoconductor-unit driven time is converted to the photosensitive drum surface moving distance, a coefficient corresponding to each mode is used. The coefficient is properly used for other units (the developing unit, etc.) in the same manner.
The printer in the image forming system basically turns on/off the drive of the photoconductor units 2Y, 2C, 2M, and 2K simultaneously. However, when a monochrome image is printed, only the K photoconductor unit is driven. Therefore, the driven distance D(i) becomes largely different between the photoconductor unit 2K and the photoconductor units 2Y, 2C, and 2M for other colors. Further, the photoconductor units 2Y, 2C, and 2M are turned on and off simultaneously at all times, and therefore, their driven distance D(i) are basically supposed to be the same, but can be occasionally different. For example, among these four photoconductor units 2Y, 2C, 2M, and 2K, when only the photoconductor unit 2C has a failure due to an unexpected reason, only the photoconductor unit 2C is replaced. Consequently, after the replacement, the driven distance D(i) of the photoconductor unit 2C is different from that of the photoconductor units 2Y and 2M. Therefore, the driven distance D(i) is calculated separately. The same thing applies to the developing units 7Y, 7C, 7M, and 7K and the developer.
The driven distances D(i=5 to 8) of the Y, M, C, and K developing units are updated by the controller 200 in the following manner. That is, the time from the start to the end of the operation is counted for the respective developing clutches 127Y, 127C, 127M, and 127K. On completion of time counting, the counting result is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to convert the developing unit driven time [sec] to the surface-moving distance [mm] of the developing sleeve, and the conversion result is added to the driven distances D(i=5 to 8) of the Y, C, M, and K developing units up to that time.
The driven distances D(i=9 to 12) of the Y, M, C, and K developers are updated by employing the surface moving distance (same as that of the developing sleeve) of the screw of the developing unit as an alternative characteristic, according to the following manner. That is, the time from the start to the end of the operation is counted for the respective developing clutches 127Y, 127C, 127M, and 127K. On completion of time counting, the counting result is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to convert the developer driven time [sec] to the surface moving distance [mm] of the screw, and the conversion result is added to the driven distances D(i=9 to 12) of the Y, M, C, and K developers up to that time.
The screw and the developing sleeve are turned on/off simultaneously at all times, and the surface migration thereof is synchronized with each other. However, the developing unit and the developer have different driven distance D(i) due to the reason explained below. That is, since the developer has different lifetime from that of the developing unit, in the printer of the image forming system, the replacement cycle of the developer is set to be shorter than that of the developing unit (a threshold described later is different between the developer and the developing unit).
The controller 200 updates the driven distance D(13) of the transfer unit in the following manner. That is, the time from the start to the end of the operation is counted for the transfer belt motor 208. On completion of time counting, the counting result is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to convert the driven time [sec] of the transfer unit to the surface moving distance [mm] of the transfer unit, and the conversion result is added to the driven distance D(13) of the transfer unit up to that time.
The driven distance D(14) of the belt cleaning unit is updated by employing not the moving distance of the cleaning blade 42a itself but the surface moving distance of the intermediate transfer belt 41 contacting the cleaning blade 42a as an alternative characteristic. That is, the time from the start to the end of the operation is counted for the transfer belt motor 208. On completion of time counting, the counting result is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to convert the blade driven time [sec] to the surface moving distance [mm] of the blade, and the conversion result is added to the driven distance D(14) of the belt cleaning unit up to that time.
The controller 200 updates the driven distance D(15) of the secondary transfer unit in the following manner. That is, the time from the start to the end of the operation is counted for the secondary transfer motor 209. On completion of time counting, the counting result is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to convert the driven time [sec] of the secondary transfer unit to the moving distance [mm] of the secondary transfer roller, and the conversion result is added to the driven distance D(15) of the secondary transfer unit up to that time.
The controller 200 updates the driven distance D(16) of the fixing unit in the following manner. That is, the time from the start to the end of the operation is counted for the fixing motor 210. On completion of time counting, the counting result is multiplied by a predetermined coefficient to convert the driven time [sec] of the fixing unit to the moving distance [mm] of the fixing belt, and the conversion result is added to the driven distance D(16) of the fixing unit up to that time.
The controller 200 that updates the driven distance D(i) of each unit functions as an operation counting unit that counts the unit operating time, i.e., the operation time of each unit, and converts the unit operating time to the driven distance D(i) as the operation record of the unit.
The number of prints P(i=1 to 16) in each unit is updated by adding 1 to the number of prints P(i=1 to 16) up to that time every time a countup-signal is received from the print counter 205.
The lifetime driven distance Ld(i=1 to 16) and the replacement index X(i=1 to 16) in each unit have a characteristic as a constant rather than a variable. However, due to some reasons, there is a possibility that these can be updated or corrected by a key input by an operator. In the image forming system, therefore, these are handled as variables.
When the print job has finished (Yes at step S3), after a unit variable i expressing the unit type is reset to zero (step S4), 1 is added to the unit variable i (step S5). The unit driven distance D(i) is then updated by the above process (step S6). For example, when the unit variable i is 1, the unit driven distance D(1) of the Y photoconductor is updated. After the update, the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) is calculated based on the following relational expression: T1(i)={Ld(i)−D(i)}/{D(i)/t(i)} (step S7). The sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) is then calculated based on a relational expression: T2(i)={Lp(i)−P(i)}/{P(i)/t(i)} (step S8), and then the unit remaining lifetime T3(i) is updated to either smaller value of the distance remaining lifetime T1 or the sheet remaining lifetime T2 (step S9).
As seen from the relational expression shown at step S7, the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) is obtained by dividing a difference between the lifetime driven distance Ld(i) as the assumed lifetime index and the driven distance D(i) up to the present by an average driven distance per day. That is, the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) is a numerical value estimating how many days are required for the driven distance D(i) to reach the lifetime driven distance Ld(i), based on the accumulated driven distances of the unit up to the present. On the other hand, the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) is, as seen from the relational expression shown at step S8, obtained by dividing a difference between the lifetime print volume Lp(i) as the assumed lifetime index and the number of prints P(i) up to the present by an average number of prints per day. That is, the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) is a numerical value estimating how many days are required for the number of prints P(i) to reach the lifetime print volume Lp(i) based on the current accumulated number of prints.
While it suffices that only one of the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) and the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) is calculated and designated as the unit-remaining lifetime, but in the image forming system, as shown at step S9, the shorter one of T1(i) and T2(i) is designated as the unit-remaining lifetime T3(i). This is because of the following reason. That is, the unit driven distance D(i) and the number of prints P(i) are not in a favorable correlation. Specifically, either in a single printing operation in which an image is formed only on one recording paper or in a continuous printing operation in which images are continuously formed on a plurality of printing paper, an idle operation, in which each unit is driven without forming a toner image, is performed at the time of starting the job and ending the job. The idle operation is performed for the same time period in the single printing operation and the continuous printing operation. Accordingly, in the single printing operation, the percentage of the idle operation time in the total operation time is large, as compared to the continuous printing operation. Further, in the continuous printing operation, the percentage of the idle operation changes according to the number of continuous printing, and as the number of continuous printing increases, the percentage of the idle operation time decreases. Therefore, in a user who performs the single printing operation relatively frequently, the unit driven distance D(i) relatively increases, although the number of prints P(i) is relatively small. With such a user, if the unit remaining lifetime is determined based on only the number of prints P(i), there is a possibility that the parts can be worn out before life estimation is performed. On the contrary, in a user who performs the continuous printing operation relatively frequently, the number of prints P(i) relatively increases, although the unit driven distance D(i) is relatively short. With such a user, if the unit remaining lifetime is determined based on only the unit driven distance D(i), there is a possibility that the parts can be worn out before life estimation is performed. Therefore, in the image forming system, either smaller value of the unit driven distance D(i) or the number of prints P(i) is designated as the unit remaining lifetime T3(i). Accordingly, unit life estimation can be accurately performed both for the user who performs the single printing operation relatively frequently and the user who performs the continuous printing operation relatively frequently.
When the unit remaining lifetime T3(i) is updated, it is then determined whether the unit remaining lifetime T3(i) has reached a predetermined replacement index X(i) (step S10). If the replacement index X(i) is set, for example, to 45 [days], it is determined that “the unit will wear out soon” 45 days prior to the day when the unit is estimated to wear out. If such a determination is not made (step S10: No), in other words, when it is determined that there is enough time until the service life of the unit ends, it is then determined whether the unit variable i is 16, that is, life estimation has been performed with respect to all types of units (step S12). When the unit variable i is not 16 (No at step S12), the control flow returns to S5. Accordingly, life estimation is performed for the next unit.
On the other hand, at step S10, if it is determined that “the unit will wear out soon” (Yes at step S10), after a replacement request flag F1(i) is set for the unit (step S11), the step S12 is performed.
Thereafter, when it is determined that the unit variable i is 16 at step S12, that is, when life estimation has been performed with respect to all types of units, it is then determined whether any one of the replacement request flags F1(1) to F1(16) is being set (step S13). When it is determined that no replacement request flag is being set (No at step S13), the continuous control flow finishes. On the other hand, when it is determined that a replacement request flag is being set (Yes at step S13), it is determined whether a previous report flag F2(i) is being set for the unit (step S14).
The previous report flag F2(i) is set when the unit corresponding to the unit variable i transmits a replacement request signal indicating that replacement is necessary to the remote monitoring device 600, and released when the replacement of the unit is made. When there is a unit with the previous report flag F2(i) being set (Yes at step S14), the replacement request signal was transmitted for the unit in the past. Therefore, the continuous control flow finishes without transmitting the replacement request signal for the unit. On the other hand, when the previous report flag F2(i) is not set for all the units (No at step S14), the replacement request signal for the unit, for which replacement of the unit is required, and a signal of the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) for all other units are transmitted from the modem 207 as a transmitter to the remote monitoring device via the telephone line (step S15). After the previous report flag F2(i) is set for the unit (step S16), the continuous control flow finishes. The reason why the unit remaining lifetime is expressed as (u)T3(i) instead of T3(i) is that not only the information of the unit remaining lifetime but also an individual user ID (or printer ID) added to each user are transmitted at the same time at step S15. The sign “u” expresses the user ID. Since the user ID information is transmitted at the same time, the remote monitoring device having received the signal can specify in which unit of which user the replacement request has been issued.
The controller 200 that performs such a unit-replacement-request determination process as a life remaining-time calculator that calculates the unit remaining lifetime T3(i) for each of various types of units based on the unit operating time t(i), the unit driven distance D(i), and the number of prints P(i) as operation record, and the lifetime driven distance Ld(i), and lifetime print volume Lp(i) as the lifetime index. The controller 200 also functions as a replacement-request determining unit that determines whether replacement of each unit is necessary based on the calculation result by the life remaining-time calculator, and the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) and the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) as predetermined replacement indices.
When it is determined that the previous report flag F2(i) is not being set (No step S3), it is then determined whether the unit variable i is 16, and when the unit variable i is not 16, the process returns to step S2. It is then determined whether the previous report flag F2(i+1) is being set for the next unit (i+1).
The remote monitoring device 600 installed in the maintenance service center has a modem as a communication unit, a CPU as a calculation unit, a display, and an RAM, an ROM, and a hard disk. When a signal transmitted from the printers via the telephone line is received by the modem as the communication unit, various types of data processing are performed based on the signal.
Further, when a signal of the unit-remaining lifetime (u)T3(i), which does not include the replacement request signal from some printer connected to the remote monitoring device 600 via the telephone line, is received (Yes at step S3), the unit-remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) already stored in the hard disk is replaced by a new one (step S4). Accordingly, the unit-remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) for other units regularly transmitted everyday from the printer, in which the replacement request has is issued for some unit, is regularly updated everyday in the remote monitoring device.
Thereafter, steps S5 and S6 are performed (these are explained later) for easier understanding. Steps S7 to S13 forms a step group, at which various kinds of determination processes are performed for units, for which the unit order flag (u)F3(i) is not set at step S2, in other words, units in which the replacement request has not yet been issued.
At steps S7 to S13, at first, after the unit variable i is reset to zero (step S7), 1 is added to the unit variable i (step S8). It is then determined whether the unit order flag (u)F3(i) corresponding to the unit variable i is being set (step S9). Due to a reason described below, when it is determined that the unit order flag (u)F3(i) is being set (Yes at step S9), the unit variable i at that time corresponds to the unit for which the unit order flag (u)F3(i) has been set at step S2. In such a case, the process returns to step S8, and 1 is added to the unit variable i to perform determination for the next unit.
On the other hand, when the unit order flag (u)F3(i) is not set (No at step S9), an order determination threshold Z(i) is set to a value obtained by adding an order determining additional value Y(i) to the replacement index X(i) (step S10). The order determination threshold Z(i) is a threshold for determining the necessity of order for replacement work, and is set in unit of day for each type of unit. The replacement index X(i) is the same as the one used in the replacement request process shown in
When the unit-remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) is longer than the order determination threshold Z(i) (No at step S11), it means that the replacement request is not issued even if the replacement index X(i) is extended slightly longer than the original value. In such a case, the determination process for the unit corresponding to the unit variable i finishes (No at step S13), and the determination process for the next unit corresponding to the unit variable i is performed (steps S8 to S11). On the other hand, when the unit-remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) is equal to or less than the order determination threshold Z(i) (Yes at step S11), it means that the replacement request is issued if the replacement index X(i) is extended slightly longer than the original value. In such a case, after an order suspension flag (u)F4 corresponding to the user variable u is set (step S12), the continuous process returns to the initial step. The order suspension flag (u)F4(i) is a flag for suspending the order of replacement work with respect to the unit in which the unit order flag (u)F3(i) is set.
In other words, in the step group of steps S7 to S13, it is determined whether the requirement for issuing the replacement request is satisfied when the replacement index X(i) is extended slightly longer than the original value, with respect to units other than the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued. When the requirement is satisfied in some unit, the order suspension flag (u)F4(i) is set therein, and the order of replacement work with respect to the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued is suspended. At this time, the unit order flag (u)F3(i) for the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued is remained in the set state (step S2).
On the other hand, when the requirement for issuing the replacement request is not satisfied even if the replacement index X(i) is extended slightly longer than the original value, in all the units other than the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued (Yes at step S13), the replacement work is ordered for the unit. Specifically, a replacement-work order signal for the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued is transmitted to the order acceptance terminal 610 in the parts center from the modem of the remote monitoring device via the telephone line (step S14). Accordingly, a replacement worker is dispatched from the parts center to the user to replace the unit in which the replacement request has been issued. Upon transmission of the replacement-work order signal, all the unit order flags (u)F3(i) being set are released.
As explained above, when the replacement request signal transmitted from the user printer is received at step S1, the unit order flag (u)F3(i) is set for the unit of the user, in which the replacement request has been issued (step S2). It is then determined whether the order suspension flag (u)F4(i) is being set (step S5). When the order suspension flag (u)F4(i) is being set, a replacement request issued in the past in a unit other than the unit in which the unit order flag (u)F3(i) has been set at step S2 immediately before, and the unit order flag (u)F3(i) has been already set as well for the unit. However, the replacement work for that unit is suspended due to setting of the order suspension flag (u)F4(i), and hence the order has not been placed yet. In other words, when it is determined that the order suspension flag (u)F4(i) is being set at step S5, the condition is as described below. That is, although a replacement request issued in the past for a certain unit, it was estimated that a replacement request for another unit separate from the unit would be issued soon, and hence the order of the replacement work for the former unit was suspended and then the replacement request for the latter unit had just been issued. Therefore, in such a case (Yes at step S5), after the order suspension flag (u)F4(i) is released (step S6), a replacement-work order signal for these units is transmitted to the order acceptance terminal in the parts center.
When the controller 200 in the printer as the replacement-request determining unit determines that replacement is required for some unit, the remote monitoring device 600 that performs such a replacement order process as an order-timing determining unit that determines a replacement-work order timing for the unit based on the unit-remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) in other units.
The respective control flows shown in
Modified examples of the image forming system are explained next. The modified examples have the same configuration as previously described for the image forming system of the first embodiment unless otherwise specified.
The photoconductor gear 133C engages with the photoconductor gear 133Y via an idler gear 134. Accordingly, the Y photosensitive drum is rotated via the drive gear 121YCM, the photoconductor gear 133C, the idler gear 134, and the photoconductor gear 133Y.
On the other hand, the K photoconductor unit and the K developing unit are driven by the process drive motor 120K as in the image forming system according to the first embodiment. The drive gear 121K fixed to the motor shaft of the process drive motor 120K engages with the photoconductor gear 133K. Accordingly, the K photosensitive drum is rotated. Although not shown for brevity, the drive gear 121K also engages with the developing gear (not shown), and a rotation driving force of the developing gear is transmitted to the developing unit via the developing clutch (not shown).
The Y, M, and C developing units (not shown) are driven by one developing motor (not shown) that commonly drives these developing units.
In the printer having such a configuration, the driven distances D(i=1 to 3) of the Y, C, and M photoconductor units are calculated, respectively, based on the driven time of the one photoconductor drive motor 135YCM. However, since there is a possibility that one or two photoconductor units of the Y, C, and M three photoconductor units can be unexpectedly replaced due to a failure or the like, the driven distances D(i=1 to 3) of the photoconductor units are calculated separately for each color. The number of prints of the Y, C, and M photoconductor units P(i=1 to 3) is also calculated separately for each color of Y, C, and M, due to the same reason.
The driven distances D(i=5 to 7) of the Y, C, and M developing units, and the driven distances D(i=9 to 11) of the Y, C, and M developers are calculated based on the driven time of one developing motor. However, since there is a possibility that one or two developing units of the three (Y, C, and M) developing units can be unexpectedly replaced due to a failure or the like, the driven distances of the developing units and the driven distances of the developers are calculated separately for each color. The number of prints of the developing units P(i=5 to 7) is also calculated separately for each color of Y, C, and M, due to the same reason.
The driven distance D(4) of the K photoconductor unit, the driven distance D(8) of the K developing unit, and the driven distance D(12) of the K developer are calculated by the same process as in the first embodiment.
When a replacement request is issued in some unit, the controller of the printer itself can determine whether to order the unit, and also functions as an order-timing determining unit. Therefore, the controller does not transmit an order request signal and the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) of other units to the remote monitoring device, even when the replacement request is issued. When the requirement for ordering the replacement work is satisfied, the controller itself transmits a replacement-work order signal of the unit to the order acceptance terminal in the part service center. However, when an emergency call has been made, the controller transmits the signal to the remote monitoring device.
An image forming system according to a second embodiment of the present invention is explained next. The image forming system of the second embodiment is basically of the same configuration and operates in a similar manner as that of the first embodiment. Accordingly, the same description is not repeated herein.
The replacement request process is performed by the controller 200 of the printer in the same manner as previously described in combination with
When the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) is not equal to or less than the order determination threshold Z(i) (No at step S7), it means that the replacement request is not issued even if the replacement index X(i) is extended slightly than the original value. Therefore, the control flow is returned to S4, and the determination process for the next unit is performed. On the other hand, when the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) is equal to or less than the order determination threshold Z(i) (Yes at step S7), it means that the replacement request will be issued if the replacement index X(i) is extended slightly than the original value. In such a case, after the unit order flag (u)F3(i) for the unit is set, the determination process for the next unit is performed. According to the step group of S3 to S9, it is determined whether a replacement request will be issued soon in all units in which the replacement request has not been issued yet at present. If there is a unit in which the replacement request will be issued soon, the unit order flag (u)F3(i) for the unit is also set.
Lastly, at step S10, a replacement work order signal is transmitted to the order acceptance terminal in the parts center for all units in which the unit order flag (u)F3(i) is being set. When considerable time is required until a replacement request will be issued in all the units in which a replacement request has not been issued yet, the unit order flags (u)F3(i) for these units are not set. Therefore, the replacement work order signal is transmitted only for the unit in which the replacement request has been issued. On the other hand, when there is a unit in which a replacement request will be issued soon, a replacement work order signal for that unit is transmitted together with the replacement work order signal for the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued.
When the controller 200 as the replacement-request determining unit determines that replacement is required for some unit, the remote monitoring device 600 that performs such a replacement order process functions as an order-timing determining unit that determines replacement-work order timing for other units, based on the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) of the respective units. When a replacement request has been issued in some unit, and when it is estimated that a replacement request will be issued soon for another unit, although it has not been issued yeti the replacement-work order timing for that unit can be advanced, matched with the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued. Accordingly, the replacement worker dispatched to the user can perform replacement work for two units, in which the replacement request is issued in a relatively short period, and maintenance work can be performed more efficiently than before.
As in the modification explained above, the function as replacement-operation order timing can be exhibited by the controller 200 of the printer, instead of using the remote monitoring device.
While the image forming system equipped with the printer that forms color images by the process units for different colors has been explained, the present invention is also applicable to an image forming system equipped with an image forming apparatus that forms only monochrome images.
In the image forming system according to the first embodiment, the remote monitoring device 600 as the order-timing determining unit is configured such that when the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) in units (in other parts) in which a replace request has not been issued is equal to or less than the order determination threshold Z(i), the replacement-work order timing is delayed for the parts, for which it is determined that replacement is necessary by the controller 200 as the replacement-request determining unit, as compared to a case that the unit remaining lifetime T3(i) in all the units in which the replacement request has not been issued exceeds the order determination threshold Z(i). In such a configuration, when a replacement request has been issued in some unit, and when it is estimated that a replacement request will be issued soon for another unit, although it has not been issued yet, the replacement-work order timing for the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued is delayed, matched with the replacement-work order timing of the unit in which a replacement request will be issued soon. Accordingly, the replacement worker dispatched to the user can perform replacement work for two units, in which the replacement request is issued in a relatively short period, and maintenance work can be performed more efficiently than before.
In the image forming system according to the second embodiment, the remote monitoring device 600 as the order-timing determining unit is configured such that when the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) in units in which a replace request has not been issued is equal to or less than the order determination threshold Z(i), the replacement-work order timing for a unit in which the unit remaining lifetime (u)T3(i) is equal to or less than the order determination threshold Z(i) is advanced, as compared to a case that the unit remaining lifetime T3(i) in all the units in which the replacement request has not been issued exceeds the order determination threshold Z(i). In such a configuration, when a replacement request has been issued in some unit, and when it is estimated that a replacement request will be issued soon for another unit, although it has not been issued yet, the replacement-work order timing for that unit can be advanced, matched with the unit in which the replacement request has been already issued. Accordingly, the replacement worker dispatched to the user can perform replacement work for two units simultaneously, in which the replacement request is issued in a relatively short period, and maintenance work can be performed more efficiently than before.
In the image forming systems according to the embodiments, two modems are provided as a communication unit that performs communication between a printer as a device and the remote monitoring device 600 as the order-timing determining unit via the communication line, and the replacement-work order timing of respective units in the printer can be determined at a remote place away from the printer. Accordingly, the replacement-work order timing of respective units in a plurality of printers can be collectively determined by a central control organization such as the maintenance service center.
The controller 200 as a first unit that functions as an operation record measuring unit, the remaining lifetime calculator, and the replacement-request determining unit, and the remote monitoring device 600 as a second unit including the order timing determining unit are formed separately, and a communication unit for communicating with each other via the telephone line is provided to both the units. Thus, while the controller 200 installed in the printer monitors issuance of a replacement request, the remote monitoring device 600 located at a remote place away from the printer can determine the replacement-work order timing.
The image forming system includes an image forming apparatus which has a photoconductor as a latent image carrier that carries a latent image on the endlessly moving surface, a developing sleeve as the developing member that obtains a toner image as a visible image by developing the latent image on the photoconductor with a developer carried on the endlessly moving surface, a transfer unit 40 that transfers the toner image on the photoconductor onto the endlessly moving intermediate transfer belt 41, and a fixing belt 64 as a fixing member that fixes the toner image on the recording paper P by bringing the endlessly moving surface thereof into close contact with the recording paper P as a recording member. Further, the controller 200 as the lifetime management device and the remote monitoring device 600 determine in combination the replacement-work order timing of at least two units of the photoconductor, the developing sleeve, the intermediate transfer belt 41, and the fixing belt 64. When it is estimated that a replacement request will be issued within a relatively short period of time for at least two units, these units are replaced at the same time, which enables improvement of the maintenance work.
The controller 200 measures the driven distance D(i), which is the accumulated surface-moving distance, as the operation amount by parts, of the photosensitive drum, the developing sleeve, the intermediate transfer belt 41, and the fixing belt 64. The controller 200 also calculates the remaining lifetime of these parts based on the driven distance D(i) and the lifetime driven distance Ld(i). Thus, the service life of respective parts can be ascertained based on the driven distance.
The cleaning blade 42a cleans the surface of the intermediate transfer belt 41 as the endlessly moving body, while contacting the surface thereof, and the replacement-work order timing of the cleaning blade 42a (belt cleaning unit) is determined. When the cleaning blade 42a and other parts will issue a replacement request in a relatively short period, replacement work for both units is performed simultaneously, which enables efficient maintenance work.
The controller 200 measures the driven distance D(13) of the transfer unit, which is the accumulated surface-moving distance of the intermediate transfer belt 41, as the operation amount by parts. The controller 200 calculates the driven distance D(14) of the cleaning unit, which is the remaining lifetime of the cleaning blade 42abased on the lifetime driven distance Ld(13) of the transfer unit as the-lifetime index. Thus, wear of the cleaning blade 42a, which is a part whose surface is not endlessly moved, can be ascertained based on the driven distance D(13) of the transfer unit, which is the surface moving distance of the intermediate transfer belt 41 coming in close contact with the cleaning blade 42a. Thus, it is possible to accurately estimate the remaining lifetime of the cleaning blade 42a.
The controller 200 calculates the number of prints P(i), which is the accumulated number of the recording paper sheets P on which an image is formed by the printer mounted with the photosensitive drum, the developing sleeve, the intermediate transfer belt 41, and the fixing belt 64, for each of these units. The controller 200 also calculates the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) as the remaining lifetime of the photosensitive drum, the developing sleeve, the intermediate transfer belt 41, and the fixing belt 64 based on the lifetime print volume Lp(i) as the lifetime index and the number of prints P(i) as the operation amount by parts. Thus, wear of the photosensitive drum, the developing sleeve, the intermediate transfer belt 41, and the fixing belt 64 in each printing operation is ascertained based on the number of prints P(i), which enables accurate life estimation.
The controller 200 counts the unit operating time t(i), which is accumulated operating time of the photosensitive drum, the developing sleeve, the intermediate transfer belt 41, and the fixing belt 64. The controller 200 calculates the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) and the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) as the remaining lifetime of the photosensitive drum, the developing sleeve, the intermediate transfer belt 41, and the fixing belt 64, based on the unit operating time t(i) in addition to the driven distance D(i) and the number of prints P(i). Thus, an average increase of the driven distance D(i) and the number of prints P(i) per day can be ascertained based on the unit operating time t(i), and based on this, the distance remaining lifetime T1(i) and the sheet remaining lifetime T2(i) can be accurately estimated.
As set forth hereinabove, according to an embodiment of the present invention, in response to a replacement request, a time to order replacement of a part (first part) of a device is determined based on remaining lifetime of other parts that do not need to be replaced yet. Specifically, when remaining lifetime of any of the other parts (second part) is likely to reach a level at which a replacement request will be issued soon, the time to order replacement of the first part is synchronized with the time or expected time to issue a replacement request for the second part. By determining a time to order replacement of parts in this manner, a replacement worker dispatched to the user can replace two or more parts, which need replacement at a relatively similar time, at once. Thus, maintenance of the device can be performed more efficiently.
Moreover, the order timing determining unit determines the replacement-work order timing of a part in which a replacement request has not been issued, based on the remaining lifetime of the part and the replacement-work order timing of the part in which a replacement request has been issued. In this determination, when a replacement request for the latter part has been issued, if the remaining lifetime of the former parts for which the replacement request has not been issued will reach a level at which a replacement request will be issued soon, the replacement-work order timing for the former part for which a replacement request has not been issued can be advanced, matched the part in which a replacement request has been issued. By determining the replacement-work order timing in this manner, the replacement worker dispatched to the user can perform replacement work for two or more parts in which a replacement request is issued in a relatively short period, thereby enabling more efficient maintenance of the device.
Furthermore, when a replacement request has been issued for some part, by transmitting a remaining lifetime signal for other parts to an external device, in addition to a replacement request signal for the part, an external determining unit or a worker can determine whether there is any part in which a replacement request will be issued soon. Upon determination that there is a part in which a replacement request will be issued soon, the determining unit or worker can advance the replacement-work order timing for the part, matched with the part in which a replacement request has already been issued. Further, the determining unit or worker can delay the replacement-work order timing for the part in which a replacement request has already been issued, matched with a part in which a replacement request will be issued soon. By advancing or delaying the replacement-work order timing in this manner, the replacement worker dispatched to the user can perform replacement work for two or more parts in which a replacement request is issued in a relatively short period, thereby enabling more efficient maintenance of the device.
Although the invention has been described with respect to a specific embodiment for a complete and clear disclosure, the appended claims are not to be thus limited but are to be construed as embodying all modifications and alternative constructions that may occur to one skilled in the art that fairly fall within the basic teaching herein set forth.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005-346301 | Nov 2005 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4585327 | Suzuki | Apr 1986 | A |
5196884 | Sugiyama et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
09-146423 | Jun 1997 | JP |
2003-076223 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2005-257781 | Sep 2005 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070122164 A1 | May 2007 | US |