The present invention is directed to an improved lift actuator, and more specifically to an electric lift actuator for use on a variety of lift systems, wherein the actuator includes various improvements that reduce cost and improve the performance (e.g., increased overall maximum capacity) and reliability of the actuator in addition to making the actuator, end-effector and components with common designs across several applications and/or load ranges.
The use of electric lift actuators is well-known in the materials handling industry. Electric lifts are particularly useful, and have been applied in several embodiments to provide varying lift capabilities for personal lift devices for lifting and transporting loads. Examples of such devices include the Gorbel G-Force™ and Easy Arm™ systems.
More specifically, the present invention is directed to a class of material handling devices called balancers or lifts, which include a motorized lift pulley having a cable or line which, with one end fixed to the pulley, wraps around the pulley as the pulley is rotated, and an end-effector or operator control in the form of a pendant or similar electromechanical device that may be attached to the other (free or non-fixed) end of the cable. The end-effector has components that connect to the load being lifted, and the pulley's rotation winds or unwinds the line and causes the end-effector to lift or lower the load connected to it. In one mode of operation, the actuator applies torque to the pulley and generates an upward line force that exactly equals the gravity force of the object being lifted so that the tension in the line essentially balances the object's weight. Therefore, the only force the operator must impose to maneuver the object is the object's acceleration force.
In one class of systems, these devices measure the human force or motion and, based on this measurement, vary the speed or force applied by the actuator (pneumatic drive or electric drive). An example of such a device is U.S. Pat. No. 4,917,360 to Yasuhiro Kojima, U.S. Pat. No. 6,622,990 to Kazerooni, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,386,513 to Kazerooni. U.S. Pat. No. 6,622,990 for a “HUMAN POWER AMPLIFIER FOR LIFTING LOAD WITH SLACK PREVENTION APPARATUS,” to Kazerooni., issued Sep. 23, 2003, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. With this and with similar devices, when the human pushes upward on the end-effector the pulley turns and lifts the load; and when the human pushes downward on the end-effector, the pulley turns in the opposite direction and lowers the load. Similar operation may be observed in systems having what is frequently referred to as a “float mode” wherein an operator's application of upward or downward force to the load itself results in system-assisted movement of the load.
The embodiments disclosed herein are designed to provide several improvements to existing electric actuator and lift systems. In a general sense, the improved design facilitates the standardization of the actuator design in order to reduce the number of components required to manufacture and service a broad range of lift systems, whereby fewer components are changed between several actuators having varying load-lifting ranges. The redesign also modifies several components in the actuator and the associated user controls (e.g., operator control pendant) so as to improve the reliability, serviceability and expandability of the controls.
Disclosed in embodiments herein is a lift actuator, comprising: a controller; an electrical motor for driving the actuator, said motor operating in response to control signals from the controller, to rotate a drum upon which a wire rope, with one end fixed to the drum, is wound and unwound; and an operator interface, attached near the free end of the wire rope, said operator interface including a detachable lifting tool, wherein the operator interface provides signals from the operator to the controller to control the operation of the actuator.
Also disclosed are: a frame for rotatably suspending the motor, mechanical reduction and drum therefrom; a load sensor attached to the frame, for sensing the load as a result of rotation of the motor/reducer/drum assembly when a load is applied to the unwound end of the wire rope; a slack sensor for sensing the angle of orientation of the motor/reducer/drum assembly and determining when a slack condition is present in response to a signal from the slack sensor, mounted on the rotating assembly in one embodiment; a universal motor and reducer assembly that may be fitted with one of a plurality of additional reducers in order to alter the capacity range of the actuator; a planetary reducer, wherein the mechanical configuration of the reducer is substantially enclosed within the wire rope pulley drum; a cable guide for controlling the position and maintaining the wrap integrity (tightness) of the cable upon being wound upon or unwound from the drum; adjustable cable limit sensors, triggered in response to the extreme axial movement of the cable guide as the cable is wound and unwound; and the cable guide including a plurality of threads for mating with grooves on the drum to provide the lateral force to move the guide as the cable is wound and unwound. Said grooves also serve as location for the wire rope on the drum, yielding precise, single layer placement of the wire rope on the drum.
Further disclosed relative to various alternative embodiments of the operator interface are: a handle; a pivotable coupling for attaching the interface to the wire rope, but permitting 360-degree rotation thereof relative to the rope by way of a pancake-like slip ring suitable for providing electrical contacts and an air channel or conduit therewith; a coil sensor for sensing a vertical component of a displacement applied to the handle, wherein the handle is coupled to a core passing within the coil by a flexible filament; a liquid crystal display on the interface to display status information to an operator; a non-contact, optical proximity sensor for detecting the presence of an operator's hand on the handle during operation; and a quick-disconnect, bayonet-type or pin-type attachment for tools to be attached to the bottom of the interface.
To follow is a description intended to provide information related to each of the various improvements to an electric lift actuator and has been described with respect to embodiments thereof. It will, however, be appreciated that several of the improvements may be used with or implemented on other types of actuators or other load-handling equipment in general and are not specifically limited to an electric actuator or lift system as described herein. The drawings are not intended to be to scale and some features thereof may be shown in enlarged proportion for improved clarity.
Referring to
In one embodiment, actuator 112 is an electric motor with a transmission, but alternatively it can be an electrically-powered motor without a transmission. Furthermore, actuator 112 can also be powered using other types of power including pneumatic, hydraulic and other alternatives. As used herein, transmissions are mechanical devices such as gears, pulleys and the like that increase or decrease the tensile force in the line. Pulley 111 can be replaced by a drum or a winch or any mechanism that can convert the rotational or angular motion provided by actuator 112 to vertical motion that raises and lowers line 113. Although in this embodiment actuator 112 directly powers the take-up pulley 111, one can mount actuator 112 at another location and transfer power to the take-up pulley 111 via another transmission system such as an assembly of chains and sprockets. Actuator 112 preferably operates in response to an electronic controller 150 that receives signals from end-effector 114 over a signal cable (not shown), wiring harness or similar signal transmission means. It will be appreciated that there are several ways to transmit electrical signals, and the transmission means can be an alternative signal transmitting means including wireless transmission (e.g., RF, optical, etc.). One embodiment of the present invention contemplates a custom coil cord 148 in which the coiled control wiring and/or air conduit are custom molded so as to permit such a cord to retain its shape (e.g., coiled around rope 113).
One or more sensors may be employed, in addition to the operator controls to provide functional and/or safety features to the system. For example, controller 150 may receive input from sensors (e.g., switches) such as a slack sensor 160, cable travel limit sensor 170, a load cell 1170 (e.g.,
In one embodiment the controller 150 contains three primary components:
1. Control circuitry including an analog circuit, a digital circuit, and/or a computer with input output capability and standard peripherals. The function of the control circuitry is to process the information received from various inputs and to generate command signals for control of the actuator (via the power amplifier).
2. A power amplifier that sends power to the actuator in response to a command from the control circuitry (e.g., a load cell indicating the force due to the load). In general, the power amplifier receives electric power from a power supply and delivers the proper amount of power to the actuator. The amount of electric power (current and/or voltage) supplied by the power amplifier to actuator 112 is determined by the command signal generated within the computer and/or control circuitry. It will be appreciated that various motor-driver-amplifier configurations may be employed, based upon the requirements of the lift. In one embodiment, the preferred motor-drive system is the ACOPOS Servo Drive produced by B&R Automation under manufacturer's part no. 8V1016.50-2. One embodiment further contemplates the addition of other modules used in conjunction with this drive, such as a CPU (e.g., ACOPOS 8AC140 or 8AC141), I/O Module (e.g., 8AC130.60-1) and similar components to complete the controls.
3. A logic circuit composed of electromechanical or solid state relays, switches and sensors, to start and stop the system in response to a sequence of possible events. For example, the relays are used to start and stop the entire system operation using two push buttons installed either on the controller or on the end-effector. The relays also engage a friction brake (not shown) in the event of power failure or when the operator leaves the system. In general, depending on the application, various architectures and detailed designs are possible for the logic circuit. In one embodiment, the logic circuit may be similar to that employed in the G-force lift manufactured and sold by Gorbel, Inc.
As described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,622,990, hereby incorporated by reference, human interface subsystem 114 may be designed to be gripped by a human hand and measures the human-applied force, i.e., the force applied by the human operator against human interface subsystem 114. In one embodiment, the human-applied force is detected by a load cell 1170 (e.g.,
Load interface subsystem 117, as will also be described below is a removable or customizable mechanism designed to interface with a load, and contains various holding, clamping or other customized load gripping devices. The design of the load interface subsystem depends on the geometry of the load and other factors related to the lifting operation. In addition to the hook 117, other load interfaces could include suction cups as well as various hooks, clamps and grippers and similar means that connect to load interface subsystems. For lifting heavy objects, the load interface subsystem may comprise multiple load interfaces (i.e., multiple hooks, clamps, grippers, suction cups, and/or combinations thereof).
Having described the components of a lift system, attention will now be turned to the various aspects of the present invention. One aspect is what is referred to as a “building block design” for the actuator system. The building block design is generally depicted in
One such example is depicted in
As will be appreciated, the embodiments depicted utilize a stacked, building block gear reduction configuration, wherein the reducer assemblies 216a, 216b and 216c differ in load carrying capacity because the internal planetary gearing 218 has ratios that are varied between the different models. For the lowest lift capacity, a simple adapter is used in lieu of additional reduction. For the heaviest capacity, a second or “stacked” reducer is added, and the design of the second reducer is selected as a function of the capacity desired for the lift actuator. Also, as different or alternative reducer (and planetary) assemblies are employed, the controller is similarly altered or re-programmed so as to appropriately adjust the motor drive characteristics to accommodate the alternative reduction capabilities of the assemblies and direction of motor rotation.
It will be appreciated that the actuator drive designs depicted in
As will be appreciated by those knowledgeable in the field of lift systems, an important aspect of the various embodiments disclosed herein is the reduction in the weight of such systems. In order to practically increase the lifting capacity of a lift, one must also consider the impact of the increased capacity on the supporting structure for the lift (e.g., trusses, cantilever arms, trolleys, etc.). Thus, while it may be possible to provide increased lifting capacity, it may be necessary to decrease the weight of the lifting equipment itself in order to obtain an advantage from the increased capacity. For example, if lift capacity can be increased by 25 kg, in order to utilize the improved lift, it is necessary to assure that the supporting structure can handle the increased capacity, or the overall weight supported by the structure must be decreased. It is the latter point that is addressed by various aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein. Reduction of actuator weight permits greater use of the supporting structure's capacity for load weight. Moreover, decreased actuator weight makes it easier to move the lift around (less operator effort (manual) or smaller motors (trolley)).
Turning next to
In one embodiment, the actuator 112 also utilizes an ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polymer wear ring 999 (the doughnut-shaped aperture at the bottom of the actuator thru which the wire rope 930 passes). Use of the wear ring results in a higher durability when compared to conventional actuators. In another embodiment, it will be appreciated that alternative designs of the actuator may alter the manner in which the supporting brackets (e.g. arm 710) are connected to the actuator drive components and/or the covers and housings as depicted in
The actuator 112 further includes the center casting 840, whereby the drum or additional reduction of the actuator drive assembly is supported therein by bearings 844, but where the drive assembly, including drum pulley 111, sleeve 712, coil cord support and arm 710, is capable of rotational, albeit constrained, motion relative to the center casting as will be appreciated as required in order to employ the load cell to sense the load at the actuator (rotation of the actuator drive components). Actuator 112 further includes, as depicted in
It will be appreciated that in addition to the molded covers, it may be possible to further reduce the cost of the actuator 112 by employing less expensive covers. For example, covers or cover components made of formed sheet metal or plastics and stock material shapes may result in significant reductions. Moreover, current sheet forming techniques permit the formation of somewhat complex shapes similar to those partially depicted in
In addition to the improved, universal drive design, the drive and control electronics, for example the ACOPOS Servo Drive , produced by B&R Automation under manufacturer's part no. 8V1016.50-2, further provides improved input/output capability and enables further design improvements characterized as plug and play components. The plug and play characteristics of the various components—actuators, handles, etc. permit the lift controller (not shown) to recognize what type of handle has been attached to the lift, and to adjust any programmatic controls or I/O so that the detected component works properly with that handle. The plug and play design overcomes difficulties observed in conventional lift systems when mechanical and electrical alterations must be made when changing from one handle type or actuator type to another, thereby avoiding time consuming and costly modifications, and permitting the possibility of field alterations and upgrades.
Another feature enabled by an improved controller associated with actuator 112 is remote diagnostic capability. In a remote diagnostic embodiment, the controller includes communication circuitry such that information may be exchanged between the actuator controller and another computing device (e.g., a workstation, crane controller, etc.) via a network connection (LAN/WAN/Internet). In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the remote diagnostic capability enables remote configuration as well as troubleshooting of a lift device such as an actuator.
For example, when a customer in Detroit has a problem with a particular actuator, it would be possible to access the controller of that actuator (with a certain network IP address or similar identifier) from a remote location, or at least to receive data from the controller at the remote location, via Ethernet, a modem and/or the Internet, and to check and change settings as well as address any performance issues. The remote diagnostic and service capability is believed to significantly reduce the cost of maintaining and servicing the systems as it is not presently possible to accomplish lift service or address performance problems without typically having a technician travel to the work site or have the actuator shipped back for service. This will greatly reduce the downtime of the unit. It is anticipated that the controller will utilize a standard communication protocol such as CANbus as well as other well-known digital communication technologies and protocols, and will at least be able to execute and log rudimentary diagnostic functionality including transmission of log information and performance records, among others.
As described above, the design of the actuator 112 is such that the drive assembly is able to rotate relative to the center casting 840. Such a design facilitates the use of a compressive load cell 1170 as depicted in more detail in
Taking the load cell out of the load path also improves the safety of lift devices because should the load cell fail, the load will not necessarily fall. Hence, the design depicted in
A further improvement to the lift actuator may include load cell signal conditioning. In addition to processing the load cell signal in order to make the signal useful for the present application, it is further contemplated that a single conditioning circuit may be employed for the load cell signal, wherein up to three or more load cells may be employed (e.g., three different load ranges) and a common or universal conditioning circuit may be used. Again the alternative to the universal signal conditioning approach would be to have separate circuits to handle the different load cells and the output signals they generate in response to the load suspended from or applied to the cable.
Referring next to
In the embodiment of
Alternative means for sensing operator input via the handle are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,386,513 to Kazerooni for a “HUMAN POWER AMPLIFIER FOR LIFTING LOAD INCLUDING APPARATUS FOR PREVENTING SLACK IN LIFTING CABLE,” issued May 14, 2002, and WO2005092054, for an “ELECTRONIC LIFT INTERFACE USING LINEAR VARIABLE DIFFERENTIAL TRANSDUCERS,” published Oct. 16, 2005, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. In one embodiment, the control pendant may be similar to that depicted, for example, in co-pending U.S. Design application Ser. No. 29/256,811, previously incorporated by reference.
Another aspect of the improved control pendant is depicted in
It will be appreciated that slip ring contacts are known, but it is believed that the design of an integrated electrical and air conduit that facilitates unrestricted rotation is an improved aspect of pendant design not previously employed in lift technology. The air conduit preferably enables the transmission of a pressurized fluid (e.g., pneumatic, vacuum, hydraulic) to a tool associated with the pendant. The improved design further controls or reduces acceptable “headroom” in the pendant at a reasonable cost.
Referring to
In various uses of an actuator and control pendant, it is sometimes necessary to change or alter the load interface in the field. For example, instead of a hook, the load may need to be lifted using a threaded connector or the like. Referring to
It will be appreciated by those familiar with lift systems that the known threaded coupling technique may be employed, or that alternatives requiring the operator to physically remove a pin 1910 (
Referring next to
As will be appreciated, the use of the rotating drive assembly for the purposes of load and slack sensing permits the load sensing device to “see” any torque loading and thereby be able to sense all the load that both the wire rope, and the coil cord/air hose would see. In other words, the load sensor will have a compressive load applied to it that is the direct result of the weight of the load. Also as the load is raised or lowered, the cumulative load remains the same, even though the relative portions of the load carried by the coil cord, air hose, and wire rope can vary. Since the entire wire rope and coil cord assembly are supported from the rotational drive assembly, the load cell senses their entire weight at all times, thus variations in load height does not affect load sensing or float mode operation. Any potentially detrimental affects, for example on float mode, of the spring force and weight of the coil cord are negated by this mounting configuration.
In alternative embodiment, it may be possible to sense slack utilizing software to monitor the current of the motor to determine a slack condition. Although possible, it remains a concern that such a method may prove to be unreliable. It is also contemplated that instead of the mechanical, contacting switch (roller switch or the like) a non-contacting proximity sensor 2040 may be employed to sense the rotation of the plate 710. Such an embodiment is depicted, for example, in
Attention is now turned to several additional aspects of the improved actuator 112, which includes a drum pulley and wire rope (cable) guide arrangement. Referring to
Assembly 2610, when assembled about the rope 930, provides a sliding gate or aperture through which the wire rope 930 departs from the drum as depicted in
Another feature of this embodiment is depicted specifically in
Referring specifically to
Although the micro switch mechanism is believed to be preferred, by virtue of its simplicity, it should be appreciated that alternative sensing systems such as a magnetic, non-contacting sensor may eliminate the contact force required to actuate the sensor and thus eliminating component wear may be employed. For example, as depicted in
The various features and functions disclosed herein are preferably implemented using a controller or similar processing system suitable for operating under the control of programmatic code. One embodiment contemplates controller 150 (
Returning to
By using the LCD it is possible to provide more and different information to the installer, the user and even maintenance staff. Once again, as an alternative to the LCD display, conventional light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and the like may be employed to communicate actuator status information to an operator.
In yet a further alternative embodiment, for example as depicted in
With additional functionality provided in the current controls, the system may also perform one or more hardware identification processes during power up, and may compare the resultant information against specified functionality. Using such information, the system may produce a warning message that can be displayed if issues are found such as inoperative or missing subsystems, for example, a missing handle or operator presence sensing being inoperative.
Again in view of the universal design intended for the various embodiments characterized herein, the present invention contemplates the use of a real-time I/O port assignment thru a flexible configuration setup, rather than modifying the source code program each time. Such a system would permit the user to access preprogrammed functionality within the controls to more rapidly configure the unit's I/O for their specific application. It is contemplated that a software interface may be provided to further simplify the ease and flexibility of application configuration.
It will be appreciated that various aspects of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 60/759,462 for an “IMPROVED LIFT ACTUATOR” filed Jan. 17, 2006, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Design application Ser. No. 29/256,812 for an “ACTUATOR FOR A LIFTING DEVICE”, filed Mar. 24, 2006, now U.S. Des. No. D543,003, and U.S. Design application Ser. No. 29/256,811 for a “HANDLE FOR A LIFTING DEVICE”, filed Mar. 24, 2006, now U.S. Des. No. D543,334, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2636953 | Hunt | Apr 1953 | A |
2940608 | Underwood et al. | Jun 1960 | A |
2991976 | Carroll | Jul 1961 | A |
3163399 | Skerry | Dec 1964 | A |
3182962 | Gray | May 1965 | A |
3258248 | Lerch et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3286989 | Bangerter et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3325148 | Powell | Jun 1967 | A |
3384350 | Powell | May 1968 | A |
3421737 | Ulbing | Jan 1969 | A |
3608743 | Mosher et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3637092 | George et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3654415 | Hawkins et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3755725 | Cordes | Aug 1973 | A |
3773296 | McKendrick | Nov 1973 | A |
3907120 | Johnston et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3921959 | Ulbing | Nov 1975 | A |
3933388 | Conboy | Jan 1976 | A |
4295771 | Mehesan | Oct 1981 | A |
4500074 | Fox et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4557659 | Scaglia | Dec 1985 | A |
4562430 | Robinson | Dec 1985 | A |
4636962 | Broyden et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4646087 | Schumann | Feb 1987 | A |
4762199 | Holmes | Aug 1988 | A |
4789135 | Watanabe | Dec 1988 | A |
4844421 | Kojima | Jul 1989 | A |
4917360 | Kojima | Apr 1990 | A |
5058468 | Lessway | Oct 1991 | A |
D336713 | Avitan et al. | Jun 1993 | S |
5261026 | Tomaru et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
D346758 | Adler | May 1994 | S |
5350075 | Kahlman | Sep 1994 | A |
5437432 | Fujikwa | Aug 1995 | A |
5480125 | Bitsch et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5520368 | Braesch et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522581 | Kulhavy | Jun 1996 | A |
5632469 | Heun et al. | May 1997 | A |
5650704 | Pratt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5707094 | Gower | Jan 1998 | A |
5848781 | Kulhavy | Dec 1998 | A |
5850928 | Kahlman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5865426 | Kazerooni | Feb 1999 | A |
5915673 | Kazerooni | Jun 1999 | A |
5967580 | Rosheim | Oct 1999 | A |
6140787 | Lokhorst et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6241462 | Wannasuphoprasit et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D445232 | Price | Jul 2001 | S |
6271828 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299139 | Kazerooni | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6386513 | Kazerooni | May 2002 | B1 |
D477901 | Robinson | Jul 2003 | S |
6595493 | Krebs et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6622990 | Kazerooni | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634621 | Keith | Oct 2003 | B2 |
D499523 | Werner et al. | Dec 2004 | S |
6907317 | Peshkin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916015 | Andreasson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928336 | Peshkin et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D526757 | Bergman et al. | Aug 2006 | S |
7090200 | Morse et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20030047726 | Nam | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030196857 | Tiner | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040035181 | Deruiter et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050179020 | Taylor et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070205405 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60759462 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29256812 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 11623710 | US | |
Parent | 29256811 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 29256812 | US |