The present disclosure relates generally to lifting machines, and more particularly to lift capacity systems for such machines.
Lifting machines, such as pipelayer machines are used for lifting and moving large objects into or above the ground. Such objects can include heavy lengths of conduit for pipelines. The installation of such conduits can be challenging. The desired locations of such pipelines can be some of the most remote areas on earth, and the terrain over which the pipeline must traverse is often some of the most rugged. The land may have significant elevational changes and varying types of ground. In order to install the conduit, the pipelayer machine must be able to traverse such terrain and be able to lift and accurately place loads often in excess of 200,000 pounds.
When installing the conduit, the pipelayer machine uses a boom on the side of the machine that can be controllably extended away from the machine over a range of angles with respect to the chassis of the machine. One or more cables may extend from a winch or other power source through a series of sheaves or pulleys and terminate in a grapple hook or other suitable terminus of the boom. The grapple hook can then be secured to the pipe in such a way that when the winch recoils, the pipe is lifted. The pipelayer machine is then navigated to a desired location and the boom is lowered to a desired location for accurate installation of the pipe, such as into a trench.
During operation, the pipelayer machine positions the weight of the conduit in cantilevered fashion away from the chassis, engine and undercarriage of the pipelayer. As the chassis, engine and undercarriage comprise the majority of the weight of a pipelayer, depending on the weight of the pipe being lifted and the length of the boom arm, the pipelayer can be subject to potential tipping and instability. Conversely, if the pipelayer is operated to conservatively avoid the capability of the machine, the ability of the pipelayer to access the desired installation location can be significantly limited.
In addition, current demands being placed on pipelayer machines require higher lifting capacities and boom lengths/angles. The pipelayer could in theory simply be made larger and heavier to satisfy these needs, but realistically the general footprint of the pipelayer is limited by cost, maneuverability, and transportation considerations. As stated above, pipelayers need to be operated in very remote and difficult locations. Pipelayer machines also have to be nimble enough to perform the job. Moreover, over-sizing the undercarriage and boom of the pipelayer will also increase manufacturing costs in terms of materials, and operating costs in terms of fuel.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/0033158 A1 to Bonnet et. al. (“the '158 publication”) discloses a load moment indicator system and method for a pipelayer machine. The system of the '158 publication uses a sensor array for determining the tipping stability of the pipelayer machine in real-time. The sensor array uses sensors that are all provided on the main body of the pipelayer machine. In particular, the sensor array may include a load pin, a luff accelerometer, a boom winch encoder, a vehicle accelerometer, and a hook winch encoder. While the '158 publication discloses a system that determines the tipping stability of a pipelayer in real-time, the system does not take into account all of the factors relevant to tipping stability. In view of this, there is a need for pipelayer machines to include lift capacity systems that accurately determine the maximum load that the pipelayer machine can accommodate without tipping.
The lift capacity system of the present disclosure may solve one or more of the problems set forth above and/or other problems in the art. The scope of the current disclosure, however, is defined by the attached claims, and not by the ability to solve any specific problem.
In one aspect, a lift machine includes a machine chassis, a boom extending from the machine chassis, and a connector extending from the boom for coupling to a load. The machine further includes a control system that determines a lift capacity of the machine based on a skew of the connector caused by the load.
In another aspect, a method for determining a lift capacity of a lift machine is disclosed. The lift machine includes a chassis, a boom extending from the chassis, and a connector extending from the boom for coupling to a load. The method includes sensing information including: a fore, aft, and roll position of chassis, an angle of the boom, the load coupled to the connector, and a skew of the connector based on the load. The method further includes determining a lift capacity of the machine based at least on the sensed information.
In yet another aspect, a mobile pipelayer machine includes a machine chassis, a boom extending from the machine chassis, a movable counterweight extending from the machine chassis, and a connector extending from the boom for coupling to a load. The machine further includes a control system including a controller that receives information indicative of a fore, aft, and roll position of chassis, a position of the counterweight, an angle of the boom, the load coupled to the connector, a skew of the connector based on the load, and wherein the control system determines a real-time lift capacity of the machine based at least on the information.
Both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the features, as claimed. As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “having,” including,” or other variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements, but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such a process, method, article, or apparatus. Moreover, in this disclosure, relative terms, such as, for example, “about,” substantially,” and “approximately” are used to indicate a possible variation of ±10% in the stated value.
As shown in
With reference to
Sensors 64-72 may be sensors arranged to provide controller 62 with data regarding the lift capacity of pipelayer machine 10. For example, sensor 64 may be a boom angle sensor to provide data corresponding to an angle of boom 22 with respect to chassis 12. Boom angle sensor 64 may be used by control system 60 to determine, or as a value indicative of, the distance of overhang of boom 22 away from chassis 12 of pipelayer machine 10. Boom angle sensor 64 may be located at boom tip 28, or at other appropriate positions on pipelayer machine 10. Sensor 66 may be a chassis angle sensor providing data regarding corresponding to the fore or aft pitch (94
Referring to
The disclosed aspects of the present disclosure may be used in any lifting machine that has the potential to tip based on dynamic loading. For example, the present disclosure may be used by a pipelayer machine to provide an operator, supervisor or other personnel with real-time lifting capacity information of the pipelayer machine 10.
Referring to
An exemplary lift curve 100 of the present disclosure is shown in
Lift curve 100 may include various tipping load lines 102-120 that identify the relationship of tipping load to the sensed information from sensors 64-72, e.g. boom overhang distance (via boom angle sensor 64), fore, aft, and roll angle of chassis 12 (via chassis angle sensor 66), the load on the boom 22, for example, from pipe 90 (via load sensor 68), the extension of counterweight 18 (counterweight position sensor 70), and the skew or angular position of grapple hook 38 (via hook angle sensor 72). For example, tipping load line 102 may correspond to counterweight 18 fully extended to its maximum position away from chassis 12 (i.e., CTWT 100%), and the pipelayer machine on flat ground, i.e., no fore, aft, or roll inclination measured from chassis angle sensor 66, and no skew of the grapple hook 38 measured by hook angle sensor 72. Thus, under these conditions, baseline tipping load line 102 provides a point 122 identifying a tipping load of 600 kilonewtons at an overhang distance of just over 6 feet. Thus, if boom angle sensor 64 indicates an overhang distance of just over 6 feet, and the load sensor 68 indicates a load on the boom of greater than 600 kilonewtons, e.g., 700 kilonewtons (point 124 in
The tipping load lines 104-110 may also take into account the fore, aft, and roll angle of the pipelayer machine 10. Such angular orientations of pipelayer machine 10 may be indicative of the pipelayer machine 10 operating on an incline in one or more of the fore pitch, aft pitch, and roll directions. For example, lift curve 100 of
Adding a roll angle to the pipelayer machine 10 of negative 0.5 degrees (away from the ditch) in addition to the 16 degrees of fore pitch provides for tipping load lines 108 and 110. Note that tipping load line 110 is the same as baseline tipping load line 102 and the tipping load line 106 of 16 degrees of fore pitch. The tipping load line 108 based on the −0.5 degrees of roll show a slight detrimental effect on the pitch tipping loads, but no effect the composite tipping load line associated with the 16 degrees of fore pitch. The −0.5 degrees of roll provides for the same clipping effect of baseline load line 102 as the 16 degrees of fore pitch alone.
As noted above, lift curve 100 may also take into account the skew of grapple hook 38 with respect to a plum-line position 80. The skew of grapple hook 38 can be a roll skew angle 82 (
Finally, adding an additional roll skew of 4 degrees to grapple hook 38 (in addition to the machine pitch, machine roll, and hook roll skew discussed above) provides for tipping load lines 116 and 118. Note that tipping load line 116 is the same as tipping load line 112. The 4 degrees of roll skew of grapple hook 38 has a detrimental effect on the roll tipping load of pipelayer machine 10, as indicated by the shifting to the left of tipping load line 118 compared to tipping load line 114. The composite tipping load line of tipping load lines 116 and 118 is shown in bolded line 120 of
The lift capacity system of the present disclosure may facilitate a more accurate tracking of tipping loads, may facilitate a safe operation of the pipelayer machine 10 by helping to avoid tipping, and/or facilitates a more efficient operation of the pipelayer machine 10 by allowing the machine to operate closer to its maximum capacity.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the disclosed system without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Other embodiments of the system will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the lift capacity system disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5160055 | Gray | Nov 1992 | A |
7912612 | Janardhan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
9238570 | Schoonmaker et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9902596 | Morrow et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10138094 | Eberharter et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10173868 | Nysse et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10410124 | Zhou | Sep 2019 | B1 |
20040200644 | Paine | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20190033158 | Bonnet et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101939246 | Jan 2011 | CN |
2072343 | Sep 1983 | GB |
67080 | Oct 2007 | RU |
WO-2009103216 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210094803 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |