This invention relates to load handlers which mount on lift truck carriages. In one aspect, the invention relates particularly to a load handler having a fork positioner which can be attached to an existing lift truck carriage, or incorporated as original equipment in a newly-manufactured carriage. In a separate aspect, the invention relates to a wireless fluid power function selector for multifunction load handlers of different types, which may include fork positioners, push-pull attachments, load clamps or other types of load manipulators.
Fork positioners actuated by pairs of hydraulic cylinders, motor-driven screws, or the like represent one type of load handler used extensively on fork-supporting lift truck carriages. Most of these fork positioners are furnished as integral components of a carriage, often in combination with a side-shifting function which enables the carriage to be moved transversely so as to side-shift the forks in unison. Some detachably-mountable fork positioners have been provided in the past, such as those shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,756,661, 4,902,190 and 6,672,823, to enable existing lift truck carriages without fork-positioning capability to be provided with such capability. However such detachably-mounted side-shifters have in the past increased the dimensions of the lift truck carriage, either horizontally as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,756,661 which reduces the load-carrying capacity of a counterbalanced lift truck by moving the load forward, or vertically as shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,902,190 and 6,672,823 which impairs the lift truck operator's visibility over the top of the carriage.
Many types of load handlers have multiple separately-controllable fluid power functions. Most of these functions require bidirectional, reversible actuation. Examples of such load handlers include side-shifting fork positioners, side-shifting push-pull attachments, side-shifting and/or rotational load clamps having either parallel sliding clamp arms or pivoting clamp arms, and other types of fluid power-actuated multi-function load handlers. Normally, the foregoing types of load handlers are mounted on a load carriage which is selectively raised and lowered on a mast of an industrial lift truck. Multiple fluid control valves are often provided in the lift truck operator's compartment to separately regulate each of the multiple fluid power functions of the load handler. In such cases, four or even six hydraulic lines must communicate between the lift truck and the load handler to operate the multiple bidirectional functions. To avoid the necessity for more than two hydraulic lines, it has long been common to provide only a single control valve in the operator's compartment connected to a single pair of hydraulic lines extending between the lift truck and a multi-function load handler. In such case, one or more solenoid valves are mounted on the load handler controlled by electrical wires routed between the lift truck and the load handler so that the operator can electrically select which load handler function will be actuated by the single pair of hydraulic lines. However, routing the electrical wires over the lift truck mast to a vertically movable load handler requires exposure of the wires and their connectors to significant hazards, wear and deterioration, resulting in breakage, short-circuiting, corrosion and other problems which require relatively frequent replacement and downtime. Moreover, lift truck electrical systems range from twelve to ninety-six volts, requiring a variety of special coils for the solenoid valves.
In other types of industrial work equipment, it has been known to control one or more remote solenoid valves by means of a radio transmitter controlled by the operator, which controls the solenoid valve(s) by sending signals to a remote receiver, as shown for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,647,255, 3,768,367, 3,892,079, 4,381,872, 4,526,413, and 6,662,881. However, these control systems are generally not compatible with the special requirements of lift truck-mounted load handlers with respect to minimizing the size and electrical power demands of such systems, and maximizing the safety thereof. For example, their lack of two-way wireless communication between the transmitter and receiver limits the functionality, reliability and safety of their working components.
In one aspect of the invention, a need exists for a highly-compact fork positioner which does not require such increased dimensions, does not significantly impair operator visibility, and is easy to mount on existing lift truck carriages or newly-manufactured carriages.
In a completely separate aspect of the invention, a need exists for wireless control systems for lift truck-mounted load handlers of different types, which systems are especially adapted to satisfy the particular requirements of such load handlers and the counterbalanced lift trucks upon which they are mounted.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
As shown in
If the carriage 10 is of the side-shifting type, its side-shifting piston and cylinder assembly 24 is preferably located immediately beneath, rather than above, the upper member 14 to maximize the operator's visibility over the top of the carriage when the carriage is lowered, and to leave an open space between the side-shifting piston and cylinder assembly 24 and the lower member 16 for enhanced operator visibility through the center of the carriage.
It is often desirable that the carriage 10, whether or not of the side-shifting type, be provided with a fork positioner for enabling the forks 18 to be selectively moved toward or away from each other so as to adjust the transverse spacing between them. To provide this function, a unique fork positioner indicated generally as 28 is disclosed in
A pair of fork-positioning guide members 36, 38 each connects to a respective piston rod 30e, 32e by means of a respective rod connector 36a, 38a (
When the fork positioner 28 has been mounted to the carriage in an inserted position between the upper member 14 and the lower member 16 as shown in the figures, the piston and cylinder assemblies 30 and 32 can move the guide members 36 and 38 selectively toward and away from each other. Fork positioning force is applied by the guide members 36, 38 to the sides of the respective forks 18 in a substantially direct, nonbinding fashion so that the forks slide easily toward and away from each other along the upper transverse fork-supporting member 14. To maximize this nonbinding force transmission, the fork-engaging surfaces 36c, 38c are preferably vertically coextensive with at least a major portion of the distance separating the respective longitudinal axes 30a, 32a of the piston and cylinder assemblies.
In order to provide easy mounting of the fork positioner on the carriage 10 in its inserted position between the upper member 14 and lower member 16, the piston and cylinder assemblies 30 and 32 are preferably mountable on the carriage 10 while interconnected with each other as a unit, for example by the cylinder connector 34 and/or the fork-positioning guide members 36, 38. This unitized insertable fork positioner package requires no unitizing framework other than the piston and cylinder assemblies themselves and, if desired, also the fork-positioning guide members. The resultant rigid, essentially frameless fork positioner unit is thus so compact that it can be mounted in its inserted position centrally on the carriage 10 without significantly impairing the operator's visibility, or altering the dimensions of the carriage 10 in a way that would push the load forwardly and thereby reduce the load-carrying capacity of the lift truck. Moreover, mounting of the fork positioner on the carriage is greatly simplified by the unitized nature of the fork positioner, and by the fact that only the piston and cylinder assemblies 30, 32 must be supportably connected to the carriage 10 since the fork-positioning guide members 36, 38 are supportable by the piston and cylinder assemblies 30, 32 independently of any engagement by either guide member with a fork 18.
One possible easy mounting arrangement for the piston and cylinder assemblies 30 and 32 is to connect the respective base portions 30c, 32c of the cylinders to respective end members 26 of the carriage 10 by screws 39 as shown in the drawings or by any other convenient means. If an existing carriage 10 has no such end members, they can easily be added to the carriage as part of the assembly process. Alternatively, the piston and cylinder assemblies 30a, 32a could be more centrally mounted to the carriage 10 by one or more brackets attached to the carriage upper member 14 or 14a in a manner which does not significantly impair operator visibility through the center of the carriage.
Preferably, the cylinder connector 34 includes one or more hydraulic fluid line connectors 42, 44, 46, 48 communicating with the interiors of the respective cylinders 30b, 32b. For example, one such connector 44 (
Although the preferred form of the fork positioner utilizes piston and cylinder assemblies wherein each cylinder 30b, 32b is connected to the carriage 10 so as to prevent the cylinder's longitudinal movement relative to the carriage, a reversed structure wherein piston rods are connected to the carriage so that their cylinders can move the fork-positioning guide members would also be within the scope of the invention.
If it is desired to have only a single pair of hydraulic lines 60, 62, and no electrical wires, extending between the lift truck and the load handler 10, 28 of
In the circuit of
If, instead of actuating the side-shifting piston and cylinder assembly 24 in one direction or the other, the operator wishes to operate a second hydraulic actuator in the form of fork-positioning cylinders 30 and 32, he controls this second function of the load handler using the same valve 64 while simultaneously manually closing switch 64b, such as by a push button at the location 64c on the handle 64a. Closure of the switch 64b causes a radio transceiver 78 on the lift truck body to transmit a radio signal 78a to a transceiver 80 located on the load handler 10, 28.
Both transceivers 78 and 80 are programmable to employ any one of thousands of unique matched identity codes, and to transmit these unique codes to each other bidirectionally as radio signals 78a and 80a, respectively, in a conventional “hand shaking” procedure whereby each transceiver authenticates the identity of the other before enabling transceiver 80 to respond to actuating commands from transceiver 78. Preferably the two transceivers are produced with matched identity codes at the factory. However, in subsequent use it may become necessary to match the identities of two previously unmatched transceivers in the field due to the substitution of a different load handler or transceiver. The transceivers are therefore easily reprogrammable in a conventional manner to enable the user to synchronize the respective identity codes so that the transceivers can interact responsively with each other.
Assuming that the transceivers 78 and 80 have synchronized identity codes, the transceiver 80 will respond to the radio signal 78a initiated by the operator's closure of switch 64b by closing a solenoid activation switch 79, thereby energizing solenoid 76a of function-selector valve 76 and moving its valve spool downwardly as seen in
Since the battery 84 is independent of the lift truck electrical system, the battery, solenoid coil and other control system components can be standardized to a single, uniform voltage, such as twelve volts, for any type of lift truck, regardless of its electrical system.
Preferably, solenoid valve 76, transceiver 80, and their independent battery power source 84 are highly compact units mountable in the limited space available within the load handler. Minimizing the size of these components minimizes the fore and aft horizontal dimensions of the load handler, thereby maximizing the load-carrying capacity of the counterbalanced lift truck upon which it is mounted by keeping the center of gravity of the load as far rearward as is possible. For example, these components can be mounted as a module on the top of the lower transverse member 16a of the carriage 10 so as to be side-shiftable, without increasing the fore and aft horizontal dimensions of the carriage.
The size of the solenoid valve 76 is minimized in the exemplary circuit of
The safety of the control system is maximized in one or more of three different ways. First, the use of the pair of transceivers, which can transmit their identity codes to each other to authenticate each other's identity, guards against the possibility that stray radio signals from an unauthorized transmitter, perhaps on a nearby second lift truck, might erroneously actuate the solenoid valve 76 of the lift truck and cause the inadvertent actuation of an unintended hydraulic function such as movement of the fork-positioning cylinders while a load is supported or, more dangerous, opening of clamp arms while supporting a load. Second, the provision of two-way communication between the pair of transceivers enables an improperly-functioning actuator, valve or other component, or any other unsafe condition, to be identified by one or more sensors 81 (
An exemplary wireless control circuit shown in
The pilot-controlled feature of
Pivoted arm clamps, such as the load handler 200 shown mounted on a lift truck mast 266 in
Although wireless communication by radio signals is preferred for all of the embodiments of the control system, wireless communication by optical, sonic or other wireless means is also within the scope of the invention.
Moreover, although the transmitting function of the transceiver 80 has been described principally with respect to safety-related signals, other types of wireless signals can alternatively be transmitted from the transceiver 80, or other transmitter mounted on the load handler, to the transceiver 78 or other receiver mounted on the lift truck. For example, these signals could relate in other ways to manual or automatic control by the lift truck of one or more hydraulic actuators on the load handler, in response to measurements by one or more mechanical, optical or ultrasonic sensors 81 (
The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/000,783 filed Nov. 30, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,909,563.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3092274 | Harris | Jun 1963 | A |
3373886 | Ulinski | Mar 1968 | A |
3647255 | Hale et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3754673 | Barda et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3768367 | Fuzzell | Oct 1973 | A |
3851779 | Crawford | Dec 1974 | A |
3889833 | Thomas | Jun 1975 | A |
3892079 | Hirano et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
4002256 | Kroboth | Jan 1977 | A |
4125199 | Abels et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4161256 | Seaberg | Jul 1979 | A |
4286692 | Bauer et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4303269 | Faughnan | Dec 1981 | A |
4381166 | Smart | Apr 1983 | A |
4381872 | Hahn | May 1983 | A |
4392772 | Reeves | Jul 1983 | A |
4395188 | Kaup | Jul 1983 | A |
4406575 | Gaibler | Sep 1983 | A |
4526413 | Williams | Jul 1985 | A |
4533290 | Hackauf | Aug 1985 | A |
4588345 | Anttila | May 1986 | A |
4667736 | Rumbaugh et al. | May 1987 | A |
4714399 | Olson | Dec 1987 | A |
4756661 | Smart | Jul 1988 | A |
4902190 | House | Feb 1990 | A |
5033934 | Emilio | Jul 1991 | A |
5052882 | Blau et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5096363 | Weinert et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5139385 | Chase et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5335955 | Pekka et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336039 | House | Aug 1994 | A |
5417464 | Seaberg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5443294 | Prinz et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5604715 | Aman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5653489 | Fandrich et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5746564 | McPherson | May 1998 | A |
5807060 | Hamlik | Sep 1998 | A |
5897596 | Kabune et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5927932 | Seaberg | Jul 1999 | A |
5957213 | Loraas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6112612 | Seksaria et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6279686 | Kaup | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6332098 | Ross et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6354782 | Barry | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6390763 | Prentice | May 2002 | B1 |
6413185 | Baginski et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439826 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6662881 | Domann | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672823 | Henning | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6851915 | Warner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7121457 | Michal, III | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20010039464 | Hackauf | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041948 | Ross et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020003221 | Koyama et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040069497 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102869 | Andersen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102870 | Andersen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
GM 74 39 361 | Mar 1975 | DE |
28 35 031 | Feb 1980 | DE |
G 83 01 302.4 | Nov 1983 | DE |
G 85 01 143.6 | Mar 1985 | DE |
G 78 36 443.9 | Dec 1987 | DE |
34 00 916 | Mar 1988 | DE |
36 32 031 | Apr 1988 | DE |
36 39 933 | Jun 1988 | DE |
G 92 02 642.7 | Apr 1992 | DE |
40 41 846 | Jun 1992 | DE |
35 15 524 | Dec 1994 | DE |
196 29 194 | Jan 1997 | DE |
101 09 851 | Sep 2001 | DE |
2 030 542 | Apr 1980 | GB |
53-61982 | May 1978 | JP |
53-79673 | Jul 1978 | JP |
54-120075 | Aug 1979 | JP |
56-121095 | Sep 1981 | JP |
56-140595 | Oct 1981 | JP |
56-144096 | Oct 1981 | JP |
56-144098 | Oct 1981 | JP |
59-172399 | Sep 1984 | JP |
61-132397 | Aug 1986 | JP |
S62-89295 | Jun 1987 | JP |
62-235197 | Oct 1987 | JP |
S62-259997 | Nov 1987 | JP |
2095698 | Apr 1990 | JP |
2138094 | May 1990 | JP |
2276799 | Nov 1990 | JP |
3244886 | Oct 1991 | JP |
2561847 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2000-219499 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002-321899 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003285682 | Oct 2003 | JP |
WO8200997 | Apr 1982 | WO |
WO9221606 | Dec 1992 | WO |
WO2004007338 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2009 in corresponding Canadian patent application (now Canadian Patent No. 2,586,069). |
Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2010 in corresponding Japanese patent application No. 2007-544343. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2006 in corresponding PCT patent application No. PCT/US05/36978. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060115354 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11000783 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11187619 | US |