The invention relates generally to a ceiling formwork system for building and construction, and in particular to a formwork support system and the method of operation thereof in which a series of supported formwork tables are erected at a planned height in and adjacent manner for concreting of an intermediate floor.
The conventional method for erecting a formwork table involves several procedures. For example, to determine the position of supports holding up longitudinal and transverse carriers, complex calculation tables pertaining to material composition of formwork are used. Upon marking the position, supports are then erected. During the erecting of the supports, additional equipment is used to level the support. Upon erecting the supports, a formwork table is than placed on the support for concreting. The problem with such conventional methods is that such conventional methods are labour intensive and contribute to a large number of man-hours in the building construction. Apart from the problem mentioned, such conventional methods also pose safety threats, such as falling from heights, as workers need to climb higher to erect taller supports for higher ceilings which can be more than six meters in height.
Furthermore, formwork table are often reused. Specifically, after the ceiling at the first location is concreted, the formwork tables are transported to another location within the same level or to the next level. To detach the formwork table from the concreted ceiling, the formwork table has to be lowered by adjusting the screw jack near the leg of the support using a hammer which is time consuming and wherein the hammering also may decrease the lifetime of the support. For ease of transport to the platform where the crane will hoist the formwork table to the next location, tall supports with formwork table are then tilted using a chain block to replace the jack bases with castors. The tilting of tall formwork table exposes the risk of it toppling on the workers below. In addition, the transportation of formwork tables using castors requires 4 to 5 men to transport, which further adds additional man-hour to the construction. Pushing the tall formwork table may also endanger the 4 to 5 men transporting it should it fall due to uneven ground.
Improvements to the formwork system as describe above have been established in a couple of embodiments (US 2010/0025563, U.S. Pat. No. 6,176,463). The later replaces conventional supports with a tripod supporting a stringer. Fixed positions are indicated on the longitudinal and transverse carriers for the supports which eradicate the use of complex tables. The later has basically simplified the formwork system and made the materials portable by trolleys and boxes. However, the later still requires a number of men on the job, and in addition it places workers at risk of falling whenever any installation work is above human height. For higher heights, workers still have to climb higher posing risks of fall from height.
The invention was created to address or at least substantially ameliorate deficiencies of existing arrangements including by reducing man-hours and increasing safety in the construction of formwork support systems. The invention comprises of three components, the formwork table, at least one stackable truss frame and a landing gear.
The formwork support system comprises a formwork table. The formwork table comprises longitudinal beams, transverse joists spaced apart for forklift engagement and a top layer. It should be noted that the terms “forklift”, “lift truck” and the like referred to herein refer to any type of forklift truck, or similar machinery adapted for lifting application.
The formwork support system further comprises at least one stackable truss frame. In the preferred embodiment, the stackable truss frame is substantially cuboid, supported by diagonal braces. A lifting means engagement is integrated at the bottom of the frame for lift truck application. The vertical support of the frame also incorporates a mechanical interlock whereby the top is the female part and the bottom is the male part, these constitute the stacking ability of the frame. The base frame is then attached with four adjustable landing legs with gearbox to ease the motion to level the formwork table. The standardizing of the width and length of the frame simplifies the formwork system, from a system which uses of complex tables for positioning to a system which only requires the motion of lifting and placing. In accordance, it eliminates possible collapse due to miscalculation of number of support or spacings between supports.
This invention is fully operated by a lift truck once assembled. When erecting a formwork table at higher height a formwork table is first attached to a frame and the adjustable landing leg is attached to another frame, to reach the planned height, a combination of frames of different height can be stacked accordingly. While this invention can be used to erect formwork table at any height, it is most advantageous for stacking at higher heights. The stacking ability of the invention coupled with it being accustomed to lift truck application, greatly reduces the number of men used in construction and also diminishes the risk of worker falling from height due to the erecting of formwork table.
The adjustable landing leg in the invention incorporates a geared mechanism, which eases adjusting the leveling and height of heavy formwork tables. The use of a landing gear can increase the lifetime of the equipment as there is no hammering which can cause dents or deformation of the equipment. In the preferred embodiment, the gear box is permanently sealed with grease for longer maintenance free operations.
The transition time and energy between dismantling of lower level formwork table to be transported for erecting of formwork table on a higher level. The dismantling of formwork table is simplified into three steps. First is to adjust the landing gear to detach from the ceiling. Secondly, as there are no locks or pins for the stacking of frames, after detachment from the ceiling, a lift truck can simply dismantle the formwork table by lifting up. Lastly, the individual components are transported to the next area where the ceiling is being concreted, or a crane platform to be hoisted to the next level.
The advantages of the invention are cost, time, man-power, safety, space storage saving. As there are no hammering, equipment lifetime is increased, thus saves cost in maintaining the equipment and labour cost. Time is saved as the transition for erecting and dismantling is greatly reduced. Heavy lifting and transportation is now done by the lift truck, thus less man-power is needed for the construction. Worker safety is enhanced since assembling of parts are done at human height and the stacking of stackable truss frame to reach the desired height is done by forklift trucks. The invention can be stripped down to individual parts which favors compact storage.
For better understanding of the invention, several exemplary components are described with reference to the enclosed drawings in the following.
Formwork Support System
Referring to
Referring to
Referring again to
In a preferred embodiment, the stackable truss frame 105 is substantially cuboid, and comprising vertical trusses 145, horizontal trusses 155 and diagonal bracing trusses 115. The stackable truss frame 105 may be disassemblable so as to provide for on-site assembly for use and disassembly for transportation.
The stackable truss frame 105 may have varying dimensions depending on the application, but in a preferred embodiment measures 2 m width, 2 m in height, and 2 m in depth. In one embodiment, stackable truss frames 105 of the differing heights may be employed such that a stack of stackable truss frames 105 having differing heights may be employed for the purposes of attaining a specific height.
In a preferred embodiment, the stackable truss frame 105 is disassemblable. Referring to
In use, the stackable truss frame 105 may be set in place using a lifting means, such as a forklift. In one manner, a stackable truss frame 105 may be placed atop a stack of stackable truss frames 105 to reach the desired height. Alternatively, in another manner, a stack of stackable truss frames 105 may be raised by lifting means such that an additional stackable truss frame 105 may be located beneath the stack. In either manner, the stackable truss frame 105 further comprises a lifting means engagement 120 adapted for engaging a lifting means in use. Various lifting means may be used depending on the application, however in a preferred embodiment the lifting means engagement 120 is adapted for engagement by a forklift.
Referring now to
As is apparent from the embodiment given in
Referring to
In a preferred embodiment, the height adjustable landing means 110 is adapted to account for sloping or uneven floor surfaces. In this manner, the height adjustable landing means 110 comprises at least one height adjustable landing leg 125. Referring to
In a preferred embodiment, the formwork support system 100 comprises four height adjustable landing legs 125. The four height adjustable landing legs 125 may be located to engage the vertical trusses 145 of the stackable truss frame 105. Each height adjustable landing leg 125 may be further provided with a pivotable foot 160 to account for uneven surfaces.
In a preferred embodiment, the stackable truss frame 105 comprises a complimentary mechanical interlock 140 adapted for engaging a complimentary mechanical interlock of another stackable truss frame 105 in use. The mechanical interlock 140 substantially prevents against stackable truss frames 105 in a stack from becoming dislodged under weight.
The stackable truss frame 105 comprises upper mechanical interlock portions for engaging an upper stackable truss frame 105 and lower mechanical interlock portions for engaging lower stackable truss frames 105. Referring now to
Referring again to
Method for Erecting a Formwork Support System
There is also provided a method for erecting a formwork support system 100 comprising at least one stackable truss frame 105. The method comprises engaging a lifting means engagement 120 of the at least one stackable truss frame 105 using a lifting means. In a preferred embodiment, the lifting means engagement 120 is adapted for engagement by a forklift whole offer, it should be appreciated that various lifting means may be employed depending on the application. In this manner, the lifting means is adapted to lift the stackable truss frame 105 for the purposes of forming a stack comprising two or more stackable truss frame is 105. The stack of stackable truss frame is 105 is therefore employed for the purposes of providing support for a formwork table 150 at a preferred height. In a stack in the stackable truss frames 105 an additional stackable truss frame may be placed atop a stack of stackable truss frames 105 or alternatively, a stack of stackable truss frames 105 may be raised such that an additional stackable truss frame 105 may be positioned beneath the stack.
In stacking the stacking truss frames 105, the method further comprises interlocking complimentary mechanical interlock's 140 of adjacent stackable truss frames 105. In a preferred embodiment, a stackable truss frame 105 as a male mechanical interlock portion 140a located at a lower portion of the stackable truss frame 105 and a female mechanical interlock portion 140b located at an upper portion of the stackable truss frame 105. In this manner, the method further comprises bringing the mechanical interlock portions 140b of adjacent stackable truss frames 105 together so as to form a mechanical interlock.
In order to attain precise height adjustment, the method further comprises adjusting the height of a height adjustable landing means 110 of the formwork support system 100. In a preferred embodiment, the height adjustable landing means 110 comprises at least one height adjustable landing leg 125. Preferably, the at least one height adjustable landing leg comprises a geared mechanism 130 for the purposes of adjusting the height of the height adjustable landing leg 125. As such, the method further comprises adjusting the height of at least one height adjustable landing leg 125, preferably by hand, such as by using a winch handle 135 or the like.
Once at least one stackable truss frame 105 and the height adjustable landing means 110 have been configured in this manner, the method further comprises providing a formwork table 150 atop the uppermost stackable truss frame 105 for the purposes of supporting formwork. In one manner, the uppermost stackable truss frame 105 may be raised into place with the formwork table 150 attached, alternatively, the formwork table 150 may be attached to the uppermost stackable truss frame 105 wherein the uppermost stackable truss frame 105 is in place. In this manner, the formwork table 105 comprises one or more spaced apart joists 510 spaced apart in a manner to accommodate forks on a forklift. Such joists 510 were shown in further detail in
Once an intermediate floor has been formed, the method further comprises deconstructing the formwork support system 100 for relocation to the next upper floor. Such deconstruction may comprise the disengagement of the mechanical interlock's 140 of adjacent stackable truss frames 105 and transportation of stackable truss frames 105 to the next upper floor.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SG2012/000274 | 7/27/2012 | WO | 00 | 1/27/2015 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/017980 | 1/30/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1742738 | Turner | Jan 1930 | A |
2598730 | Thompson | Jun 1952 | A |
2632567 | Richtmyer | Mar 1953 | A |
2671697 | North | Mar 1954 | A |
2940597 | Machielse | Jun 1960 | A |
3157424 | Hall | Nov 1964 | A |
3177823 | Entel | Apr 1965 | A |
3409266 | Jennings | Nov 1968 | A |
3506138 | Travis | Apr 1970 | A |
3620388 | Harry Mansson | Nov 1971 | A |
3650078 | Jennings | Mar 1972 | A |
3664273 | Howe | May 1972 | A |
3665869 | Howe | May 1972 | A |
4290370 | Gallagher | Sep 1981 | A |
4841708 | Johnston | Jun 1989 | A |
5348149 | McCarthy | Sep 1994 | A |
5411360 | Hilliker | May 1995 | A |
5579865 | Butler | Dec 1996 | A |
5586616 | Ksenych | Dec 1996 | A |
5906165 | McCorkle, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
6135299 | Burgess | Oct 2000 | A |
6161359 | Ono | Dec 2000 | A |
6176463 | Röck | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6343555 | Arai | Feb 2002 | B1 |
8002128 | Kern | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8327775 | Fox Harris | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8955700 | Barber | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20100006375 | Southworth | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025563 | Seng et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201915616 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102527555 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2360550 | Jun 2011 | ES |
1480197 | May 1967 | FR |
S 5796173 | Jun 1982 | JP |
H 06158877 | Jun 1994 | JP |
H 08284439 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000110368 | Apr 2000 | JP |
4623570 | Feb 2011 | JP |
10-2003-0029571 | Apr 2003 | KR |
10-2005-0071008 | Jul 2005 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, dated Sep. 7, 2012 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/SG2012/000274. |
Written Opinion of the ISA, dated Sep. 7, 2012 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/SG2012/000274. |
Written Opinion of the IPEA, dated Sep. 1, 2014 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/SG2012/000274. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 7, 2014 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/SG2012/000274. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150267422 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |