The present invention relates to systems and methods of industrial monitoring and quality control, and more specifically to systems and methods for detecting the alignment of vehicle headlamps.
At the end of World War II major building of the highway system we know today began in both the U.S. and Europe. In that era brightness of electric lamps was rated the same as commonly used today for the consumer, namely higher wattage produces higher brightness. It is important to understand that “brightness” is related to response of the human eye in the visible part of the spectrum which lies between the shorter wavelengths of ultraviolet and the longer wavelengths of infrared.
Freeways known today in the U.S. were only beginning to be built after the war;
therefore, nighttime road illumination was related to stopping safety in combination with close passing oncoming traffic. Therefore, for visibility safety the Department of Transportation (DOT) established vehicle headlamp wattage to be a maximum of 60 watts on the mainly two-way U.S. roads. In Europe of that reconstruction era the building of higher-speed roadways dictated vehicle headlamps at a maximum 65 watts for visibility safety. Those wattages remain in effect today.
In the mid to late 1990′s technology for manufacturing electric arc type headlamps evolved in Europe. These vehicle arc lamps produce approximately three times the brightness of incandescent vehicle lamps, and arc lamp power consumption is one half the incandescent wattage. Combining those statistics results in a total efficiency improvement approximately six times that of incandescent lamps in the visible spectrum. Under these circumstances 35-watt electric arc lamps readily meet highway regulatory maximum wattage requirements both in the U.S. and Europe, even though they are much brighter to the eye! While that increased brightness is an improvement in night vision for drivers using arc lamps, at the same time there is a major risk of causing unsafe blindness in the oncoming traffic. Clearly there exists an ongoing nighttime vehicle headlamp lighting safety issue.
In order to establish nighttime road safety for both arc and incandescent sources
DOT established sharp headlamp beam pattern regulations. It is now required that the beam pattern top be accurately aimed to relatively strict standards by vehicle manufacturers.
Vehicle headlamp alignment requires significant quality control to assure meeting
DOT aiming standards. In the field of quality control it is necessary to measure at higher accuracy than the specified regulations. Variability of the human eye cannot meet the higher standards of accuracy and repeatability to evaluate headlamp beam vertical alignment; therefore, it is necessary to evaluate headlamp alignment with electro-optical instruments. In order to meet both quality and liability issues, it has become necessary to accurately measure headlamp alignment traceable to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
By 1999 the U.S. vehicle producers began significant introduction of headlamp arc lamps in their products. In so doing quality control for headlamp aiming, also known as “headlamp audit”, became a prime concern at Ford Motor Company. Early headlamp audit equipment at Ford used Adroit Engineering beam sensors without baffling to eliminate spillover between left and right vehicle beams. This purposely created a need for the audit operator/driver to exit the vehicle and sequentially stand in front of each lamp while observing the audited position of the opposite lamp. Thereby variation of driver body weight was eliminated from the production statistical process control record.
To accomplish the foregoing this invention eliminates stray light sensor interference by introduction of sensor baffling. Having the driver exit the vehicle is still accomplished by a requirement to manually activate software recording of data from a position near the smart sensors.
A light baffle arrangement for sensors is used to limit the sensing field of view.
Arranging multiple said limited view sensors in a linear array provides a means to accurately locate and analyze the position of a beam pattern along said array axis as in checking vehicle headlamp beam alignment.
Referring to
In absence of any blocking baffle, undesirable stray light rays 1 and 2 entering D1 are reflected on the inside tubular wall of D3 such that reflected ray 1′ could intersect D2 at point c, and reflected ray 2′ could intersects D2 at point a. With said rays 1 and 2 falling outside the desired sensing field of view, it is necessary to block 1 and 2 from reaching points a and c at the edges of D2.
The location of intersection of rays 1′ and 2 at point e is controlled by inside diameter D3 such that point e falls outside view field edge a-b at point f, an axial distance L4 from aperture D1. It follows that an annular baffle located at said axial location L4 blocks rays 1′ and 2 at point e when aperture D4 edge is at point g, between points e and f.
Accurate construction of the foregoing baffling in combination with a relatively small finite detector size D2 passes a small penumbra of annular rays defined by angle a-d-c thereby creating insignificant fuzziness of detection edge of sensing field of view a-b-c-d.
The baffling arrangement in
Referring to
Sealing the sensing element enclosure cavity is window 307 held in place by a plastic set of rails 308 beneath which are resilient seals 309. Adjacent to the inside window face is a spacer ring 310 clamping retaining baffle apertures 311 and 312 spaced between said cylindrical baffle liners 303.
The resulting sensor 304 and baffle components 303, 311, and 312 complete the means of sensing light in a limited cone view 313 as previously described in
Referring to
Referring to
The foregoing descriptions of the embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. The scope of present invention is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3467473 | Preston | Sep 1969 | A |
3515485 | Irwin | Jun 1970 | A |
3532432 | Mansour | Oct 1970 | A |
3746449 | Schick | Jul 1973 | A |
3791740 | Proefrock | Feb 1974 | A |
3830570 | Groetzner | Aug 1974 | A |
4092071 | Puyplat | May 1978 | A |
4120589 | Mima | Oct 1978 | A |
4134680 | Hunter | Jan 1979 | A |
4634275 | Yoshida | Jan 1987 | A |
4647195 | Ishikawa | Mar 1987 | A |
4744655 | Sdika | May 1988 | A |
4907877 | Fukuda | Mar 1990 | A |
4970403 | Krasutsky | Nov 1990 | A |
5078490 | Oldweiler | Jan 1992 | A |
5170220 | Matsumoto | Dec 1992 | A |
5210589 | Kaya | May 1993 | A |
5318172 | Kenny | Jun 1994 | A |
5321439 | Rogers | Jun 1994 | A |
5331393 | Hopkins | Jul 1994 | A |
5373357 | Hopkins | Dec 1994 | A |
5379104 | Takao | Jan 1995 | A |
5392111 | Murata | Feb 1995 | A |
5426500 | Ohana | Jun 1995 | A |
5485265 | Hopkins | Jan 1996 | A |
5504574 | Murata | Apr 1996 | A |
5619322 | Murata | Apr 1997 | A |
5751832 | Panter | May 1998 | A |
5796473 | Murata | Aug 1998 | A |
5796522 | Meyers | Aug 1998 | A |
5818571 | Prettyjohns | Oct 1998 | A |
5861628 | Genna | Jan 1999 | A |
7275847 | Kiyota | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7876427 | Melvin | Jan 2011 | B1 |
20020167657 | Tomasz | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040263847 | Merle | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060055811 | Fritz | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060256320 | Peterson | Nov 2006 | A1 |