This invention pertains to a readily constructed light-control assembly designed for reliable light-blocking that is particularly effective in dynamic control of daylighting and shading. In the light-control assembly opaque or translucent slats or other light-blocking members are rotated up to 360° by applying rotary force at a single end of each of the light-blocking members, and less preferably at both ends thereof. The assembly achieves unusually effective light-blocking through the use of a beam having circular bores with bearing members associated with the bores that have offset flanges or other engagement means to ensure accurate positioning and reliable operation of the bearing members over a range of 360° rotation of light-blocking members mounted in the bearing members. The bearing members are coupled to the beam with offset positioning of the flanges or other engagement means making it possible to closely fit abutting edges of the light-blocking members by overlapping the web portions between adjacent bores in the beam to achieve enhanced, uniform light-blocking.
The U.S. Department of Energy as well as sustainable construction organizations and the like are pressing for the installation of dynamic daylighting and shading systems to improve energy efficiency in buildings. Innovations like that of the present invention are sorely needed to meet this need.
Various types of transparent and translucent glazing systems are available for the construction of horizontal, vertical and sloped glazing in skylights, roofs, walls, and other architectural structures designed to pass light for daylighting interiors or other purposes. When using such glazing systems, it is therefore desirable, in accord with sustainable construction criteria, to optimize the system's shading coefficient to reduce solar heat gain on hot summer days and during peak sunlight hours year round, while providing maximum light and solar heating on cold winter days and when it is otherwise needed or desired. It is also often desirable to control glare and direct sunlight in order to ensure the comfort of those who occupy the space exposed to the glazing system. If architects and space planners can be freed from the constraints of current light transmission control in horizontal, vertical and sloped glazing in skylights, roofs, walls, and other architectural structures, they will be able to more effectively address these shading requirements and meet sustainable construction criteria. Furthermore, these considerations apply as well to shading of open unglazed areas.
Indeed, if the level of light entering overhead large glazed as well as unglazed areas can be simply, efficiently, effectively and uniformly controlled without significant light leakage between, e.g., multiple adjacent light-controlling members, it will further enable architects and space planners maximize energy efficiency with aesthetic and sustainable designs. However, this requires light-controlling assemblies and sun control systems that can be dynamically controlled. For example, sun tracking control shading systems that can dynamically rotate light-locking members up to 360° to shade small or large glazed and open, unglazed areas to provide the desired uniform light level inside the space thereunder would be particularly desirable.
The known approaches to controlling the amount of light admitted through glazing systems—particularly on a large scale and in overhead, horizontal and sloped glazing applications—are limited and are generally unreliable, noisy and often difficult and expensive to construct, assemble on-site, maintain and service. Also, existing approaches suffer from non-uniform and excessive light leakage between adjacent light-controlling members which appears as an aesthetically undesirable series of often irregular bright lines. Additionally, although it is often desirable to retrofit light-controlling systems to already constructed glazing systems, this is not easily accomplished with any of the current light-controlling systems. There is therefore a substantial need for an economic and readily constructed and retrofitted light-controlling system that may be used for shading glazed areas of all sizes, including very large glazed areas. There is also substantial need for such light-controlling systems that can be easily assembled, maintained and serviced, in which the light is uniformly distributed across the glazed area, and in which light leakage is de minimis or eliminated and, where present, is kept to narrow and regular lines.
Prior approaches to controlling the level of light passing into architectural structures have included louver blind assemblies using pivoting flexible light-controlling members operable behind a window or sandwiched inside a chamber formed by a double-glazed window unit. Such louver blinds require substantial support of the flexible members which, additionally, must be controlled from both their distal and their proximal ends. Furthermore, louver blinds are difficult and expensive to assemble, apply, operate, maintain and replace, and cannot be readily adapted for use in non-vertical applications or in applications in which it is either desirable or necessary to control the flexible members from only one end. Louver blinds are particularly problematic when it comes to applications in which the installation requiring light-control or shading is very long, e.g., 10 ft., 20 ft., 60 ft. or more. In addition, dynamic control of louver blinds in large overhead shading applications is complicated, expensive, difficult to install and maintain, and often simply impractical. Furthermore, rotating louver blinds requires that the rotary force be applied to the top edge of the blinds. This is because louver blinds are flexible and rely on the force of gravity to hang vertically in the proper desired position and therefore cannot be rotated from their base. Thus, louver blinds cannot be used in generally horizontal overhead glazing application or in sloped applications, where rotation must be controlled from the base or proximal end and the force of gravity on non-vertical louver blinds would create untold complications and very non-uniform shading.
Other approaches to controlling the level of light passing through architectural structures have used motorized shades or drapery. These approaches are also problematic, particularly in the applications noted above where the glazing is large and would require lengthy shades or blinds, e.g., on the order of 10 ft., 20 ft., 60 ft. or more, since such large shades would be heavy, difficult to manipulate and maintain, and expensive. The mechanics of controlling and manipulating motorized shades or drapery of any size is quite complicated and therefore motorized shades and drapery are expensive and difficult to maintain. Also, it is not possible to achieve uniform light distribution across a wide glazed space with motorized shades or drapery.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,281,353; 6,499,255; and 6,978,578 provide other more recent approaches to addressing the challenge of providing dynamic daylighting and shading systems on a large scale and in overhead, horizontal and sloped glazing applications. These patents utilize a plurality of rotatably-mounted light-blocking tubular members having at least one portion that is substantially opaque and means for rotating the light-blocking members to block out varying amounts of radiation by varying the area of the opaque portions presented to the incoming light. In the systems described in the above three patents, the light-blocking members are combined in a series of adjacent segregated elongated tubular cells or mounted for rotation in individual or paired cross-members positioned between light transmitting panels. As an alternative to tubular members, a generally rigid opaque member may be used if fitted with rings spaced along this member. Indeed, even the tubular members may be fitted with such rings in order to facilitate tubular member rotation and to improve performance. Attachment of the rings requires notching of the generally rigid opaque member and is difficult and time consuming for both generally flat and tubular members. Also, the rings interfere with light-blocking and must be wide enough to accommodate longitudinal movement due to thermal expansion and contraction. Thus, determining the width and location of the rings and receiving notches is complex and, indeed, may require architectural approval before being implemented in custom applications, often making the use of such rings inconvenient and expensive.
In the system of the '578 patent, the centers of rotation of the light-blocking members do not remain in place as the light-blocking members are rotated resulting in increased torque and load on the motor and varying horizontal positioning of the light-controlling members. Since the light-controlling members often do not run true because they are inadequately restrained and therefore bend and snake about as they rotate, uneven and continuously varying spacing between adjacent members is produced with uneven light distribution and an unacceptable appearance of disarray of the radiation blocking members. When these light-controlling members are used in vertically oriented applications, the light-blocking members disengage from lower-cross-members and run far more untrue with even greater increases in the torque/motor load and irregular lateral movement. When they are used in applications calling for an inclined orientation, the light-blocking members tend to disengage from the lower cross members and rotate in an uncontrolled manner, rubbing against one another, resulting in increased friction and torque and producing problematic noise. Finally, in tests simulating the application of snow and wind loads, excessive friction is produced between the light-blocking members and the cross-members which could cause early failure.
The paired upper and lower cross members of the '353 patent solve the above problems. However, even this dual cross member design has drawbacks where rings and notching are used. Also, when this system is in the fully closed position, there is still more light leakage than is often desired.
While the designs provided by the above three patents nevertheless represent important advances in the art, they have another serious drawback. For these designs, the light-blocking components of adjacent tubular members cannot come sufficiently close to each other when the systems are in their fully closed configuration due to intervening structural features including the material between adjacent tubular cells in the '255 patent and the tube and ring walls in the designs of the '578 and '353 patents. Therefore total blackout or near total blackout light blocking cannot be achieved.
It is therefore one objective of this invention to provide a light-control assembly in which the transmission of light can be adjusted from almost full transparency or passage of light to total black-out or near total black-out.
It is another objective of the present invention to provide a light-control assembly that is reliable, quiet in operation, and readily constructed, maintained and serviced.
It is yet another objective of the present invention to provide a light-control assembly that may be readily assembled on-site and that can be used in both new construction and retrofit applications.
It is still a further objective of the present invention to provide a light-control assembly that accommodates thermal expansion and contraction of the components of the assembly, including the light-controlling members, when the assembly is subjected to wide-ranging temperature changes at the site of installation so that, e.g., slats in the assembly can move longitudinally within bearing members free from limitations imposed by rings and notches as the slats lengthen or shorten due to temperature swings.
Still another objective of the present invention is to provide a light-control assembly that may be readily used with horizontal, vertical and sloped glazing in skylights, roofs, walls and other glazed and open unglazed architectural structures designed to pass light for daylighting interiors or other purposes.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a light-control assembly that can be readily serviced on-site.
Yet another objective of the invention is to provide light-control assemblies that can be spaced along any desired length of adjoining long light-blocking members to accommodate rotation of the light-blocking members up to 360° by applying a rotary force about their longitudinal axes at only one end of the light-blocking members.
A still further objective of the invention is to provide a light-control assembly that can simply and efficiently be used with photovoltaic members.
Another objective of the invention is to provide light-control assemblies that can be made of modular components so larger assemblies can be economically and readily constructed and used in dynamic control of daylighting and shading in applications of varying widths.
A still further objective of the present invention is to provide a light-control assembly that can accommodate radius bends in light-blocking members and that will continue to operate reliably in such installations.
It is still another objective of the present invention to provide a light-control assembly with light-controlling members that are free of notching and/or rings or other structurally weakening material removal and can be easily and simply slid into position.
It is a further objective of this invention to provide efficient, economic means for supporting and maintaining light-controlling members in panel units having spaced flat panels or sheets in ways not heretofore thought possible.
These and other objectives of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the accompanying specification, claims and drawings.
The invention, together with its objects and advantages, may be best understood by reference to the following description, taken in conjunction with the following drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements in the several figures, and in which:
The embodiments of the invention described in detail below are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention claimed to the precise structures and operations disclosed. Rather, these embodiments have been chosen and described to highlight selected principles of the invention and its application, operation and use in order to best enable those skilled in the art and others to follow its teachings.
Turning now to
Adjacent circular bores 18 are separated by a web portion 20 (
It is preferred that web portion 20 be as thin as possible in order to optimize the light-blocking performance of the light-control assembly by minimizing the distance between the adjacent edges of the light-controlling members when they are in the closed position, as will be described in more detail below in connection with
Light-control assembly 10 includes exemplary bearing members 30 as shown in
Bearing members 30 have at least two diametrically opposed notches 36a and 36b. Notches 36a and 36b have opposed notch bottoms 38a and 38b spaced a predetermined distance apart “B”. In the embodiment of these figures, notches 36a and 36b extend through the rings and into the flanges leaving web portions of the flange 40a and 40b below the bottom of each of the notches. In this illustrated embodiment bearing members 30 also include an optional second pair of diametrically opposed notches 36c and 36d equally spaced from notches 36a and 36b to help maintain the circularity of the bearing members when they are made by a plastic injection molding process.
The bearing members in this embodiment also include pairs of guide and retention tabs 42a and 42b located on opposite edges of the notches. Tabs 42a and 42b project from the inner surface 44 of the ring to define a “V” shaped receiving cavity that opens towards the center of the bearing member.
Notches 36a and 36b (optionally including retention tabs 42a and 42a) are designed to receive light-blocking members in the form, for example, of slats 150, which are described below in connection with the description of
When reference is made to a feature of the invention as being opaque or translucent it is intended to mean that the feature ranges from translucent (letting some light pass but diffusing it so that objects on one side cannot be clearly distinguished from objects on the other side) to opaque (letting no appreciable amount of light pass). When reference is made to “light” in the description of the present invention this term should be construed to include the spectral range of visible light (with or without the electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths below and above that of the visible light). When reference is made to a light-controlling member as being “spectral controlling” it is intended to mean that one or more selected portions of the spectrum are allowed to pass or are blocked, e.g., that a UV, IR or other wavelength range is allowed to pass or is blocked. When reference to a light-controlling member as being “reflecting” or “reflective” it is intended to mean that some or all of the incident light (including e.g., a selected wavelength range) is bent or sent back from a blocking surface of the light-controlling member.
Any light-blocking components used in the invention, such as the opaque or translucent or spectral controlling barrier components 64, 69 or 300a-300o, may be tinted to a level that produces the desired degree of light-blocking. Also, the light-blocking components may be segmented into light-blocking or opaque portions and transparent/translucent portions. For example, in 40-foot light-controlling members, the first 10 feet of one or more of each of the light-blocking components may be opaque, the next 5 feet transparent/translucent, and the last 25 feet opaque. Such a segmented arrangement might be used where it is desired to maintain a light-admitting area at all times. Also, translucent portions may be tinted. Typical tinting colors include white, bronze, green, blue and gray; although other colors may be used. Finally, light-controlling members may have one face (e.g., face 165 of light control member 150 or one face of flat portions 64 or 69) and a different treatment on the other face (e.g., face 167 of light control member 150 or the opposite face of flat portions 64 or 69). For example, one face may have a reflective surface and the other may have a diffusing surface so that the light-controlling member may be rotated into a first position in which it reflects incoming light away from the covered space and a second position in which the non-reflective surface diffuses the incoming light that strikes it.
The barrier components may include photovoltaic solar cells along their surface to generate electricity, preferably in conjunction with means for maximizing the photovoltaic output by rotating the light-controlling members to track the movement of the sun across the sky, ensuring that the photovoltaic solar cells continuously receive the maximum possible sunlight exposure. This combination provides in a single assembly both effective dynamic control of daylighting and shading and efficient electricity generation.
Turning now to
At least one and preferably three or more rollers or roller assemblies may be mounted on the beam about the periphery of the bores to contact the outer circular surface of the bearing members. This will help reduce friction and wear particularly in heavy usage applications, where the light-controlling members are heavy, or where it is necessary or desirable to minimize the number of light-control assemblies. Furthermore, where such rollers or roller assemblies are used they may be spaced from the front and back faces of the beam and/or undercut to create a gap for retaining the bearing members in lieu of or in addition to retainers 110 or 310 which are discussed below.
The injection molded beam illustrated in
The beam of
Thus, the first end 84 of the illustrated light-control assembly 70 includes top and bottom trapezoidal projections 86a and 86b that fit into trapezoidal cavities 102a and 102b. Trapezoidal projection 86a and corresponding trapezoidal cavity 102a are shown in the partial enlarged views of
Additionally, flexible locking clips 92 (
The trapezoidal projections are aligned and moved into their corresponding trapezoidal cavities as illustrated in
Once the desired number of beams is assembled along with the other components of the light-controlling assembly an optional reinforcement member may be applied across the top and/or the bottom edges of the assembly. For example, a metal U-channel 111 (
Light-control assembly 10, in the illustrated embodiment, also includes pairs of front and back retainers 110 which are designed to be oriented as shown and attached to the front and back faces 14 and 16 of the beams to retain the bearing members. The offset bearing members are thus coupled to the beam by trapping the retention flanges of the bearing members between front and back faces of the beam and the back surfaces 116 of the retainers. (The top front retainer was removed from
As best seen in
Beams 300 and 402 may be adapted for modular assembly like beam 70 by providing appropriate interlocking means at the ends of the beams.
Additionally, as best seen in
Finally, retainers 110 include alternating locking pins 130 and locking cavities 132 which are disposed on the backside of the retainers so that when retainers are positioned on opposite sides of the beam, the locking pins and locking cavities are aligned and paired up so that they can interconnect. These locking pins and locking cavities are illustrated in an enlarged form in
Locking pins 130 include ribs 134a-134d which project in diametrically opposite directions and have outer edges that are dimensioned to rest securely within locking cavity 132. Additionally, bottom rib 134d includes a nose portion 136 having a ramp surface 138 and a locking face 140. Locking cavities 132 also include a tubular portion with longitudinal slits 142 defining a top flexible tubular portion 146.
Thus, when retainers 110 are properly positioned on opposite faces 14 and 16 of the beam with ribs 120A-120C aligned with cavities 83a-83c and locking pins 130 aligned within locking cavities 132, the retainers are pressed together until they rest against the opposite faces of the beam. Nose portion 136 is positioned and dimensioned so that as it moves into cavity 132 the top flexible tubular portion 146 flexes upwardly as the nose portion flexes downwardly until the nose portion hooks onto a latch bar 147 whereupon the locking pins lock in the cavities affixing the retainers onto the front and back of the beam. Additionally, when multiple beams are joined together, the retainers will be offset as shown in
However, before the assembly of the retainers onto the beams is completed, a first bearing member 30 is mounted in a first bore such as bore 18a of
Bearing member 326 comprises a flat annular ring 328 with pairs of diametrically opposed notches 330 having opposed notch bottoms 332 generally corresponding to notches 36a-36d and notch bottoms 38a-38d of bearing members 30. Bearing member 326 also includes a circular outer edge 334 as depicted in
A fully assembled alternate light control assembly 400 is shown in
Turning now to
Light-controlling members such as slats 150 of
The illustrated configuration of slats 150 (as well as slats 151 and 166) gives them longitudinal, torsional, and deflection rigidity, which is desirable in the practice of this invention. The term “torsional rigidity” is intended to refer to the ability of the slats to resist deformation when forces are applied to rotate them within the light-control assembly. “Longitudinal rigidity” is intended to refer to the ability of the slats to withstand deformation or deflection when a force is applied generally along the longitudinal axis of the slats such as when the slats are slid into the light-control assembly, as will be described in more detail below. “Deflection rigidity” is intended to refer to the ability of the slats to withstand bowing under the force of gravity or other forces which act generally perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the slats.
The top and bottom walls of slat 150 join together to form top and bottom edges 168 and 170. In the illustrated embodiment, these edges are dimensioned to fit into the opposed slots 36a and 36b of bearing members 30 although they may, of course, be used with other bearing member designs. Thus, when the mounted slats are rotated into the closed configuration illustrated in
In an alternate embodiment of the invention, slats 174 of
Slats 150 and 174 may include photovoltaic solar cells to general electricity, preferably in conjunction with means for maximizing the photovoltaic output by rotating the light-controlling members with movement of the sun across the sky to insure that the photovoltaic solar cells continuously receive the maximum possible sunlight exposure while providing daylighting into the space below.
Finally, it is noted that the light-reflective surfaces of segments 190, 191 and/or 192 may be micro-prismatic reflective surfaces. Total light enhancement can be achieved by positioning such micro optical prisms to tunnel additional light into the interior space below the light-controlling members.
A drive mechanism 200 that may be used in the invention is illustrated in
Worm gear 212 (mounted onto shaft 204 of the mounting combs) meshes with an internal worm (not shown) having a circular axial cavity 216 with a key 218. Thus a rotation shaft 22 with a corresponding slat to receive key 218 is designed to be passed through cavities 216 of drive mechanisms 200 associated with each of a series of slats in a modular light-control assembly. As a result, rotation of the shaft will produce corresponding and coordinated rotation of all of the slats associated with drive mechanisms attached to the shaft.
This is illustrated in
Looking to the right top of
A light-control assembly 10 in accordance with the invention (such as that of
Panels and sheets 250, 252, 254 and skylight 256 may be made of various transparent and translucent materials, including, but not limited to, plastics (including, e.g., polycarbonates and acrylics), fiberglass, perforated metal fabric, or glass. In one preferred embodiment, a Pentaglas® honeycomb polycarbonate translucent panel available from CPI Daylighting Inc. (Lake Forest, Ill.) will be used in these applications. These polycarbonate panels, which are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,895,701 (incorporated herein by reference), have an integral extruded honeycomb structural core consisting of small honeycomb cells approximately 0.16 inch by 0.16 inch which provides internal flexibility to absorb expansion and minimize stress and resists impact buckling. The resulting design offers smaller spans between rib supports, resulting in stronger durability, as well as superior light quality, visual appeal, higher insulation and excellent UV resistance. The internal flexibility of the panels absorbs thermal expansion through the panel in all directions (on the x, y, and z axes). This minimizes stress in all directions and preserves dimensional stability. The panels also have a high impact absorbing and load bearing property, a good ratio of weight to strength, and UV protection on both sides of the panel. The superior light diffusion capabilities ensure excellent quality of natural light. The panels are environmentally friendly, non-toxic, and made of 100% recyclable material.
Also, the light-control assembly may be provided with automatic sun tracking, with appropriate embedded programming that senses the daylight outside and manages the level of light and solar heat gain inside based on the level of sunlight outside. This will enable users to control natural daylight and comfort levels in any space—whether covered by glazing or not—all day long, and all year long, simply by setting desired light levels.
The beam, retainers, and light-controlling members may be made of any desirable material. In one preferred embodiment, these components may be injection molded from polycarbonate resins or acetyl. Preferably at least the bearing members and more preferably all of the components of the light-control assembly will be molded from polytetrafluoroethylene-infused polycarbonate resins. Also, although in the illustrated preferred embodiment the beam, bearing members, retainers, and slats are injection molded, one or more of these components may be made in other ways and may be made of other materials, as appropriate. For example, beam 70 may be made of punched aluminum.
A light-control assembly generally as in
1. A beam 70 is provided and a series of bearing members, such as bearing members 30, mounted in the bores of the support member with the retention flanges of adjacent bearing members alternating from face to face of the beam (and thus offset) so that no two flanges are adjacent each other on the same face of the beam and the flanges preferably overlap the web portions between adjacent bores.
2. Retainers 110 are positioned on opposite faces 14 and 16 of the beam so the tabs 120a, 120b and 120c of the retainers fit in cavities 83a, 83b and 83c of the beams and locking pins 130 are pressed home in locking cavities 132. The retainers are thus locked to the beam with the retention flanges of the bearing members trapped between the back face 129 of the retainer on the opposite faces of the beam.
3. Optionally, the desired number of light-control assemblies 10 are interconnected by aligning trapezoidal projections 86a and 86b at one end of the beam of each assembly with trapezoidal cavities 102a and 102b at the other end of the adjacent beam whereupon the projections are slid into the cavities until the adjacent beams lock together, as described earlier, to form an enlarged modular radiation control assembly of the desired length. Also, where two or more beams are laterally connected to form an enlarged assembly, multiple pairs of retainers preferably will be applied offset with regard to the seam between the adjacent interlocked beams to further reinforce the assembly.
4. A series of radiation control assemblies are then positioned longitudinally under, above, between or adjacent the glazing that is to be treated by the light-control assembly with the bores of the radiation-control assemblies aligned. The radiation control assemblies are mounted in place by appropriate means such as by using side beams 226 (
5. Next, light-controlling members such as slats 150 or 174 of the appropriate length are slid into place in the laterally aligned bores of the bearing members so that they are supported within the successive light-controlling assemblies. In the case of slats 150 and bearing members 30, the slats will be slid into diametrically opposed notches 36a and 36b so that the opposite top and bottom edges 168 and 170 of the slats rest in opposed notch bottoms 38a and 38b. The longitudinal rigidity of the slats ensures that they can be slid into place in the successive bearing members without buckling. The torsional rigidity of the slats ensures that the slats can be rotated from one end with twisting out of shape. Finally, the deflection rigidity ensures that, one in position, the slats will not sag. Furthermore, it is noted that the overall assembly is thus readily assembled on-site and that can be used in both new construction and retrofit applications. It also ably accommodates thermal expansion and contraction of the components of the assembly, including the light-controlling members, when the assembly is subjected to wide-ranging temperature changes at the site of installation. The slats can move longitudinally within the bearing members free from the limitations imposed by rings and notches as they lengthen or shorten due to temperature swings.
6. Then, the slats are aligned and appropriate drive means attached to the control ends of the slats. “Aligned” in this context means that the slats will be parallel to each other when in the fully opened position and co-planer when in the fully closed position.
7. The resulting light-control assembly is now ready to provide light-blocking from almost full transparency to total black-out or near total black-out at a level of reliability which has heretobefore not been possible.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14798 | Bruff | May 1856 | A |
153405 | Van Horn et al. | Jul 1874 | A |
314393 | Paradise | Mar 1885 | A |
1914571 | Jones | Jun 1933 | A |
2281022 | Cavanaugh | Apr 1942 | A |
2545906 | Watkins | Mar 1951 | A |
2565979 | Michaelsen | Aug 1951 | A |
2572957 | Shaw | Oct 1951 | A |
2700803 | Graham | Feb 1955 | A |
3012294 | Waldor | Dec 1961 | A |
3120035 | Morris | Feb 1964 | A |
3375608 | Thompson | Apr 1968 | A |
3645317 | Malone | Feb 1972 | A |
4294283 | Scharres | Oct 1981 | A |
4427048 | Osaka et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4435919 | Poisson | Mar 1984 | A |
4469132 | Redington | Sep 1984 | A |
5016390 | Johnson | May 1991 | A |
5052150 | Chen | Oct 1991 | A |
5204777 | Curshod | Apr 1993 | A |
5221363 | Gillard | Jun 1993 | A |
5469658 | Digianni et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5564229 | Noska | Oct 1996 | A |
5600920 | Roy | Feb 1997 | A |
5608990 | Kyle | Mar 1997 | A |
5794380 | Guardia | Aug 1998 | A |
5918417 | Kinder | Jul 1999 | A |
6085825 | Swink et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6134842 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6499255 | Givoni | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6807772 | Halter | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6978578 | Givoni | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7281353 | Konstantin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20020129553 | Metzen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20060238994 | Chery et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060288645 | Konstantino et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080035275 | Konstantin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005003498 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110067824 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |