The present disclosure relates generally to fiber optic light applicators and more particularly to light diffusion devices.
Light diff-using tip applicators find application in a number of clinical settings. Prevalent uses include the treatment of cancerous tumors using either photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). In PDT, light diff-using fiber optics are used to uniformly irradiate an organ or tissue that has been previously treated with a photo-sensitive light-activated compound which has been allowed to accumulate in the tumor. In LITT, laser energy is applied to tissues for treating solid malignant tumors in various organs such as the liver, brain, ear nose or throat (ENT), or abdominal tissues, as well as for treating benign alterations such as prostate adenomas, Volumetric heating within target tissues during LITT results in thermal tissue necrosis and tumor death.
Light diffusing tip applicators used to carry light from a source into a target tissue during such therapies can vary significantly in terms of their size and shape, as well as the way that they distribute light. A conventional bare fiber optic that terminates in a cleaved or polished face perpendicular to the optic axis is limited in most PDT and LITT procedures. To illustrate, for, LITT procedures the power density and resulting heat generation using a bare fiber often exceed the thermal diffusion into the tissue, and areas close to the applicator therefore char or vaporize. These tissue phenomena are problematic for creating controlled photothermal lesions For example, charring limits heat deposition within deeper tissue volumes due to increased absorption of light energy by the charred region. As charred tissue continues to absorb incident light, its temperature continues to rise leading to more carbonization around the applicator, and temperature rise in deeper layers is strictly dependent on heat conduction away from this carbonized volume. While it is possible to create large thermal lesions in this manner, the morphology of the resulting lesion is highly undesirable. Furthermore, the high temperatures associated with the carbonized tissue often result in burning and failure at the tip of the optical fiber with significant attendant risk for patients and equipment. Therefore, many LITT procedures employ an applicator with a light diffuser (or diffusing tip) at the delivery end of the optical fiber. In such applications, the scattering of light over a larger surface area provided by the diffusing tip reduces the power density on the adjacent tissue and creates a larger coagulation volume while minimizing char formation,
Several techniques have been developed to obtain scattering of light from an optical fiber. One conventional technique includes selecting the ratio of the index of refraction between the core of the optical fiber and the transparent cladding such that total internal reflection is prevented, thereby allowing light to escape and radiate outside of the fiber. It is difficult, however, to achieve uniform output intensity using this method, and its use therefore is not widespread. Other conventional techniques include etching the outer surface of the core or clad using chemical or mechanical means or embedding scattering particles around the outer surface of the core or within the cladding. Such techniques typically result in a decrease in the mechanical integrity of the fiber and frequently are incapable of achieving a wide range of light distributions.
Another conventional technique employs the use of a transmissive medium such as an epoxy with embedded scattering particles and a reflector at the tip. The reflector serves to both improve homogeneity of the light exiting the fiber as well as prevent significant forward light propagation. However, the use of metallic or dielectric reflectors or plugs limits the utility of such sensors because such reflectors may absorb light energy and lead to fiber failure. Moreover; metal reflectors, in particular, may not be compatible with new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image-guided procedures. A further disadvantage is that such reflectors may be difficult or expensive to produce. Finally, the reflector and scattering medium, being of significantly different materials with differing mechanical properties, may partially or fully separate at their interface, leading to potential “hot spots,” undesirable light distributions, or degradation of diffuser performance, all of which are likely to lead to a failure in the applicator
Another conventional technique employs a cylindrical diffusing tip that includes an optically transparent core material such as silicone with scattering particles dispersed therein which abuts the core of the optical fiber. This diffusing tip is manufactured such that the concentration of scattering particles continuously increases from the proximal to distal ends of the diffusing tip. The increase in the concentration of scattering particles eliminates the need for a reflector because light is increasingly scattered along the diffusing tip length while the amount of light available decreases distally. However, this conventional technique has a number of limitations. For one, the gradient in the tip is extruded using a two-channel injector system with a mixing chamber whose contents are combined and extruded through a die. The contents are combined by varying the relative feed rates of elastomer with two different concentrations of scatterers to create a gradient in the scattering particles along the axial length of the diffusing tip,. This mixing process places fundamental limitations on the range of gradients (e.g., the rate of change of said gradients) which can be produced. Moreover, this mixing process allows for the creation of gradients only in the direction of the axis of the fiber. A radial gradient in scattering particle concentration, for example, is unachievable by this conventional process.
Further, the elastomer-based tip is first extruded as described above, cut to length and then affixed to the end of the terminus face of the delivery fiber. A plastic tube then is slid over both the jacket of the optical fiber and the diffuser core. Thus the diffuser core must be separately affixed to the optical fiber core which results in a small bonding surface area. Further, an outer tube larger than the fiber's outer jacket is required, thereby increasing the overall diameter of the device beyond the outer diameter of the fiber's outer jacket. Another disadvantage related to affixing the tip in this manner is that there are no bonding interfaces to any circumferential surfaces of the fiber. The sole axial bond is vulnerable to defects such as air gaps, especially when flexion occurs at the interface between the optical fiber core and diffuser core that causes the two to separate Air or other gaps between the optical fiber core and diffuser core change the intended light distribution and may result in unintended “hot spots” which significantly increase the risk of fiber failure during use. Gaps or defects in the interface between the diffusing core and the plastic tube placed over the core may also lead to “hot spots,” degradation of diffuser uniformity, and a decrease in power handling capability.
Accordingly, a light diffusing tip that overcomes the limitations of conventional light diffusing tips would be advantageous.
The purpose and advantages of the present disclosure will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the following detailed description in conjunction with the appended drawings in which like reference characters are used to indicate like elements, and in which.
The term light, as used herein, refers to electromagnetic radiation within any of the infrared, visible, and ultraviolet spectra. Consequently, the term light transmissive, as used herein, is used in the context of the type of light implemented Exemplary sources of light may include, but are not limited to, lasers, light emitting diodes, arc lamps, light bulbs, flash lamps, and the like.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Disposed within the housing 28 is scattering material forming a monolithic scattering medium having two or more regions, where each region comprises a scattering material having one or more scattering properties that are distinct from the scattering properties of the scattering materials of the other regions In the illustrated example of
As noted above, the scattering material 32 and the scattering material 33, in one embodiment, have one or more different scattering properties. Different scattering properties between the scattering materials 32 and 33 may be implemented by, for example, utilizing one type of scattering particle 34 (e.g., titanium dioxide) for scattering material 32 and a different type of scattering particle 36 (e.g., gold particles) for scattering material 33. As another example, the scattering particles 34 and 36 may be of different sizes and/or shapes so as to exhibit different scattering properties. As a further example, the concentration of the scattering particles 34 in the material 32 may be different than the concentration of scattering particles 36 in the material 37 so that the scattering materials 32 and 33 exhibit different scattering properties. It also should be noted that other configurations like gas bubbles in the elastomer or an emulsified liquid also may create scattering centers. Different scattering properties also may be achieved using light transmissive materials with different indexes of refraction. The scattering materials 32 and 33 also may be different from each other by a combination of any of scattering particle type, scattering particle size, scattering particle shape, scattering particle concentration or a transmissive material's index of refraction. Typically, the difference between the scattering properties of the two materials 32 and 33 is represented by a difference in their scattering coefficients (i.e., a measure of the amount of light scattering exhibited by a material).
In at least one embodiment, the scattering materials 32 and 33 are positioned within the housing 28 such that the scattering regions 30 and 31 are coextensive for, at least a portion 40 of the length of the housing 28. In the example illustrated in
As illustrated by cross-sections 42-44 at positions 45-47, respectively, of diffusing tip 23, the geometric relationship between the two scattering regions 30 and 31 varies. As the distance from the termination of the fiber core 24 increases, the cross-sectional area of the scattering material 32 decreases while the cross-sectional area of the scattering material 33 increases At point 45, the scattering medium of the diffusing tip is made up of the scattering material 32,. At point 46, the amount of scattering material 32 present decreases and the amount of scattering material 33 increases. At point 47, the scattering element of the diffusing tip 23 is almost entirely made up of the scattering material 33. Thus, the proportion of the scattering material 33 to the scattering material 32 (i.e, the proportion of the scattering region 31 to the scattering region 30) of the monolithic scattering medium generally increases from the proximal end to the distal end of the diffusing tip 23. The distal end of diffusing tip 23 may be made up entirely of scattering material 33.
The concentration and length of both the scattering region 30 and the scattering region 31 within the diffusing tip 23 may be varied to achieve a desirable light distribution. For example, longer diffusing tips may have lower concentration scattering regions or shorter lengths of higher concentration scattering regions. Similarly, shorter diffusing tips may contain a shorter length of a low concentration scattering region and a longer length of a higher concentration scattering region.
The concentration and length of each scattering region preferably is selected to result in substantially uniform emission of light along the length of the diffusing tip. The intensity of light in a partially transmissive (i.e., scattering and/or absorptive) medium typically exhibits a fall-off described by Beer's Law, I=Ioe−μz, where I represents intensity at z, Io represents initial intensity, μ represents attenuation coefficient and z represents distance away from the source. Accordingly, the characteristics of the scattering regions may be chosen so as to make the light scattered along the length of the diffusing tip approximately constant in view of Beer's Law. To illustrate, scattering regions may be arranged so that the effective scattering coefficient μ(z)=−log(1−z/L)/z, for zε[0,L]. This may be achieved by, for example, arranging the scattering regions such that the overlapping segments have profiles substantially related by the preceding equation. As another example, the scattering material 32 may have a lower concentration of scattering particles 34 than the concentration of scattering particles 36 of the scattering material 33 and, therefore, the effective concentration of scattering particles increases over the coextensive portion 40 even as the intensity of the light energy decreases. However, in certain instances it may be desirable to preferentially emit light over a given cross section of the diffusing tip 23 which may be accomplished by concentrating scattering material having higher scattering coefficients at positions where more light is intended to exit the diffusing tip 23.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In certain instances, the scattering particle concentration range for the lower scattering coefficient material and the higher scattering coefficient material varies depending on the length and core diameter of the optical waveguide. For a typical 400 micron core diameter optical waveguide, a diffusing tip of for example, 10 mm in length typically has a lower scattering coefficient material with a concentration of TiO2 scattering particles preferably between 100 mg/ml and 180 mg/ml and more preferably between 145 mg/ml and 155 mg/ml. The higher scattering coefficient material typically has a concentration of TiO2 scattering particles preferably between 2500 mg/ml and 6500 mg/ml and more preferably between 4400 mg/ml and 4650 mg/ml. The scattering regions formed from the scattering materials also may vary in length To illustrate, for the same 10 mm long diffusing tip, the length of the scattering region resulting from the lower scattering coefficient material preferably is between 1 mm and 100 mm, more preferably between 5 mm and 10 mm and even more preferably is about 6 mm. For the same diffusing tip length, the length of the scattering region formed from the higher scattering coefficient material preferably is between 1 mm and 100 mm, more preferably is between 2 mm and 5 mm and even more preferably is about 4 mm. The shapes and lengths of each scattering region and the concentration of each scattering material may be varied to achieve the desired output profile for light emitted from the diffusing tip,
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As illustrated by
Although
While several specific geometric shapes and relationships for the discrete scattering regions have been disclosed herein, any suitable arrangement of scattering regions may be implemented using the teachings provided herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. For example, the shape of the a scattering region is generally described herein as being conical in shape and increasing linearly in size from proximal to distal ends, but alternatively its shape could have a non-linear taper, such as in accordance with Beer's Law, or other geometric shape and still achieve a desired effect. As such, there are many suitable modifications and variations in the shapes, sizes, lengths, and positional arrangements of the discrete scattering regions that are within the scope of the present disclosure
Referring now to
The previous description is intended to convey a thorough understanding of the present disclosure by providing a number of specific embodiments and details involving light diffusion techniques. It is understood, however, that the present disclosure is not limited to these specific embodiments and details, which are exemplary only. It is further understood that one possessing ordinary skill in the art, in light of known systems and methods, would appreciate the use of the disclosure for its intended purposes and benefits in any number of alternative embodiments, depending upon specific design and other needs.
The present application is a divisional application of and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/989,894, filed Nov. 16, 2004, entitled “LIGHT DIFFUSING TIP,” naming inventors Ashok Gowda, Roger McNichols, Marc Gelnett, and Mathew Fox, which application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4140130 | Storm, III | Feb 1979 | A |
4466697 | Daniel | Aug 1984 | A |
4585298 | Mori | Apr 1986 | A |
4660952 | Toyoda et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4669467 | Willett et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4693556 | McCaughan | Sep 1987 | A |
4785815 | Cohen | Nov 1988 | A |
4832024 | Boussignac et al. | May 1989 | A |
4852567 | Sinofsky | Aug 1989 | A |
4862887 | Weber et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4959063 | Kojima | Sep 1990 | A |
4986628 | Lozhenko et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5042980 | Baker et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5061265 | Abela et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074632 | Potter | Dec 1991 | A |
5151096 | Khoury | Sep 1992 | A |
5169396 | Dowlatshahi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5196005 | Doiron et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5207669 | Baker et al. | May 1993 | A |
5219346 | Wagnieres et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5246436 | Rowe | Sep 1993 | A |
5269777 | Doiron et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5292320 | Brown et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303324 | Lundahl | Apr 1994 | A |
5312392 | Hofstetter et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330465 | Doiron et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337381 | Biswas et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5348552 | Nakajima et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5363458 | Pan et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373571 | Reid et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5429635 | Purcell, Jr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5431647 | Purcell, Jr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441497 | Narciso, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454807 | Lennox et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5496308 | Brown et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520681 | Fuller et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530780 | Ohsawa | Jun 1996 | A |
5536265 | van den Bergh et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545161 | Imran | Aug 1996 | A |
5607421 | Jeevanandam et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5688263 | Hauptmann et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5754717 | Esch | May 1998 | A |
5792100 | Shantha | Aug 1998 | A |
5807390 | Fuller et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824005 | Motamedi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830196 | Hicks | Nov 1998 | A |
5871521 | Kaneda et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5906606 | Chee et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908415 | Sinofsky | Jun 1999 | A |
5946441 | Esch | Aug 1999 | A |
5947959 | Sinofsky | Sep 1999 | A |
5978541 | Doiron et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997571 | Farr et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004315 | Dumont | Dec 1999 | A |
6071302 | Sinofsky et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102905 | Baxter et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106514 | O'Donnell, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6212426 | Swanson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6270492 | Sinofsky | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283958 | Vogl et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6343174 | Neuberger | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361530 | Mersch | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383179 | Neuberger | May 2002 | B1 |
6418252 | Maitland | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6503246 | Har-Shai et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6554824 | Davenport et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6576163 | Mersch | Jun 2003 | B2 |
7270656 | Gowda et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4137983 | Nov 1991 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080015560 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10989894 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11777856 | US |