Patent Grant
7830077
The present invention relates to a light-emitting device, and more particularly relates to a light-emitting device constituting a unit pixel for a flat display that has a simple configuration, can be fabricated easily, and achieves high efficiency.
Light-emitting devices have been researched and developed more and more extensively these days to find applications in various types of displays including electro-luminescence displays (ELD), plasma displays (PDP) and field emission displays (FED), among other things, and eventually realize displays with even higher image quality and even higher efficiency. Taking an ELD and an FED as examples, Non-Patent Document No. 1 outlines an ELD as follows. One example is an ELD having a basic structure of applying an electric field to a fluorescent material, which is a light-emitting layer, via an insulating layer. Known ELDs with such a structure are classified into organic dispersion types and thin film types. An organic dispersion type has a structure in which ZnS particles, doped with Cu, for example, are dispersed in an organic substance, an insulating layer is deposited thereon, and the assembly is sandwiched between top and bottom electrodes. The dopant forms a pn junction in the fluorescent particles. When an electric field is applied, electrons emitted by a high electric field generated on the junction planes are accelerated and then recombined with holes to emit light. Another example has a structure in which a fluorescent thin film, made of Mn-doped ZnS, for example, which is a light-emitting layer, is arranged between electrodes with insulating layers interposed. Since the insulating layers are interposed, a high electric field can be applied to the light-emitting layer, and the emitted electrons accelerated by the electric field excite the emission centers to emit light. FED, on the other hand, includes an electron emission device and a fluorescent material that faces the device in a vacuum container. The FED accelerates electrons, emitted into a vacuum by the electron emission device, and bombards the fluorescent layer with the electrons, thereby emitting light.
In each of these devices, the emission of electrons triggers the emission of light, and therefore, it is important to develop a technique to emit electrons at a low voltage and with high efficiency. As such a technique, emission of electrons by inverting the polarization of ferroelectrics has attracted a lot of attention lately. For example, Non-Patent Document No. 2 proposes that PZT ceramic 101, having a plane electrode 102 on one side and a lattice electrode 103 on the other side, be arranged so as to face a platinum electrode 104 with a grid electrode 105 interposed between them in a vacuum container 106 and that a pulse voltage be applied between the electrodes to emit electrons as shown in
Such a method of emitting light from a fluorescent layer by accelerating electrons, emitted by inverting polarization of ferroelectrics, in a vacuum container and, and a display using such an emission technique are also disclosed in Patent Documents Nos. 1 and 2. However, the basic arrangement is almost the same except that light is emitted from a fluorescent layer by replacing the platinum electrode of Non-Patent Document No. 2 with an electrode including the fluorescent layer.
On the other hand, a light-emitting device that uses electrons emitted by inverting the polarization of ferroelectrics in a non-vacuum is disclosed as an electric emission surface light source device in Patent Document No. 3, for example. As shown in
The applicant of the present patent application also proposed an inexpensive flat light-emitting device with a simple configuration in Patent Document No. 5. In that light-emitting device, a voltage is applied to two electrodes that are arranged in contact with the surface of a porous emitter to cause electrical discharge. And fluorescent particles in the porous emitter are excited with an ultraviolet ray produced as a result of this electrical discharge, thereby emitting light. The applicant of the present patent application further disclosed a plasma display panel in Patent Document No. 6, in which barriers that define an electrical discharge space have different heights in column and row directions in order to avoid accidental electrical discharge and to increase the luminance.
Examples of important parameters that determine the value of a superior light-emitting device include the level and stability of luminance, high efficiency, high definition, durability, the ability to contribute to reducing the thickness and applicability to a huge-screen display. In the conventional devices described above, the current PDPs could barely cope with those demands for high efficiency and high definition, and ELD still has a lot of technical problems in terms of applicability to huge-screen displays, durability and simplification of the manufacturing process.
Particularly for PDPs, which have recently been rapidly developed and put on the market one after another, PDPs must go through a lot of process steps before the fluorescent material gets ready to emit light, and achieves poor luminous efficacy. The problem is their light emission principle. Specifically, first, plasma discharge needs to be produced by applying voltage to xenon gas or neon gas in the light-emitting device. And fluorescent material applied on the inner wall of the light-emitting device is excited by the ultraviolet radiation produced by this plasma discharge, and red, green and blue lights are emitted. Due to their emission principle, PDPs have such an essential problem that a lot of process steps must be gone through before the fluorescent material is ready to emit light. That is why it is difficult for PDPs to achieve high luminous efficacy or to avoid dissipating a lot of power when applied to a huge-screen display.
On top of that, to get light emitted in a PDP, the cell structure is naturally subject to various constraints. For example, ample space is needed to produce electrical discharge in a gas such as xenon. The emitter should also be to thick enough to include a good number of centers of emission for transforming ultraviolet radiation into visible radiation and to output the visible radiation through the front facet. However, the emitter may not be too thick or too thin in order to secure a sufficient space for electrical discharge. That is to say, the thickness of the emitter needs to be controlled so as to fall within an appropriate range, which would never leave a lot of flexibility in designing its manufacturing process. Also, a gas such as xenon needs to be injected airtight after the light-emitting device has been evacuated, which would require bulky manufacturing equipment and would increase the cost significantly. Also for the reasons mentioned above, PDP tends to be vulnerable to impacts.
Considering the configuration of the light-emitting device to be applied to a display, on the other hand, there are various technical problems that must be overcome to provide a new type of display that would replace a PDP. Examples of those problems include selection of a material for the barriers forming a cell, appropriate arrangement of the barriers with respect to electrodes, and effects of the position and thickness of the emitter. Therefore, the aforementioned technology, disclosed by the applicant of the present application, may propose something that could be applied to displays in the future, but nothing on the configuration of a specific light-emitting device, e.g., a specific cell structure, among other things.
In order to overcome the problems described above, the present invention has an object of providing a method for forming a light-emitting device structure for displays that would increase not only processability but also productivity significantly by making it very easy to control its manufacturing process. Another object of the present invention is to provide a light-emitting device, of which the luminance is at least approximately equal to, or even higher than, those of PDPs and ELDs of various types and which would achieve such high efficiency and high definition as to potentially find applications in huge-screen displays in the near future.
The present inventors conducted extensive research into a light-emitting device that would achieve high luminance and high efficiency while relaxing various constraints on the device structure adopted in conventional PDPs. As a result, we discovered that if an emitter including fluorescent particles was interposed between selected insulators on a predetermined insulating substrate and if at least two electrodes were arranged at predetermined positions to apply a voltage thereto, light was emitted even in the air and the luminance varied when the thicknesses of the emitter were changed. And while carrying on our research even further, we also discovered that the emission status of the emitter changed according to the positions of those two electrodes and the dielectric constant of the insulator. Consequently, the present inventors determined an appropriate range in which the light-emitting devices could be applied to various types of displays and mass-producible on a commercial basis, thereby perfecting our invention.
A light-emitting device according to the present invention includes: a first insulator, including a plurality of portions that are arranged so as to face each other; an emitter, which includes fluorescent particles and which is arranged in a space that is defined by those portions of the first insulator; a second insulator, which functions as a base for the first insulator and the emitter; a plurality of electrodes to generate an electric field in the space; and a substrate, which faces the second insulator with the emitter interposed between them. If the first insulator is extended to reach the substrate on a plane that is viewed perpendicularly to the surface of the second insulator and that passes the center of the space, the ratio A2/A1 of the cross-sectional area A2 of the emitter to the cross-sectional area A1 of a range surrounded with the first and second insulators and the substrate is greater than 0.4 but less than 1. This A2/A1 ratio preferably exceeds 0.5.
By adopting this configuration, the thickness of the emitter being applied can be controlled more easily and the productivity and production yield will improve. It was quite impossible for any conventional light-emitting device to provide an appropriately wide range, or a sufficiently broad process margin, for this thickness. This is because the emission mechanism of light-emitting devices is totally different from that of PDPs, which require a predetermined electrical discharge space. That is to say, the present inventors propose a composite mechanism in which light is emitted by being excited with an ultraviolet ray to be produced when electrons emitted from electrodes collide against gas molecules or gas atoms and in which light is also emitted when the center of emission is excited with the electrons that have been emitted from electrodes and have collided against the surface of fluorescent particles. Also, if the configuration of the present invention is adopted, there is no need to introduce a substitute rare gas unlike PDPs, which would also contribute to simplifying the manufacturing process. According to the present invention, the “transparent substrate” is typically a glass substrate, but does not have to be made of glass. For example, a flexible resin substrate made of an acrylic resin may also be used substantially without diminishing the effect of the present invention.
In any of the light-emitting devices mentioned above, an embodiment in which the first and second insulators are made of the same material is never excluded but rather preferred in order to simplify the manufacturing process or increase the mechanical strength. This is because in that case, the first and second insulators could be formed together as an integral member by a sandblast process, for example. Also, the effect of the present invention will manifest itself if the first and second insulators have a dielectric constant of 5 or more. As far as the dielectric constant is concerned, it is more preferred that one of the first and second insulators has a dielectric constant of 30 or more and the other insulator has a dielectric constant of 5 or more. Even more preferably, one of the first and second insulators has a dielectric constant of 100 or more and the other insulator has a dielectric constant of 30 or more. Furthermore, for any of the light-emitting devices described above, those portions of the first insulator that are arranged so as to face each other may naturally be a pair of insulators with a rectangular parallelepiped shape. Alternatively, the first insulator may also have a column structure with a trapezoidal cross section as is adopted in preferred embodiments of the present invention to be described later. Furthermore, for any of the light-emitting devices described above, the light-transmitting substrate refers to a substrate arranged at the outermost position of the light-emitting device, not to a light-transmitting film or layer covering the electrode. “At least one electrode that either faces or contacts with the first insulator at least partially” refers to not only an embodiment in which the electrode is arranged on the light-transmitting substrate and contacts or faces the first insulator partially but also an embodiment in which the electrode is put on the first insulator and contacts or faces the light-transmitting substrate partially as well.
The insulating metal oxide used as the first and second insulators is preferably made of either a glass material or a mixture of a glass material and a metal oxide. This is because a mixture including a glass material would be easier to form into an intended shape, which is advantageous in making huge-screen displays. Examples of specific materials include not only glass materials but also Y2O3, Li2O, MgO, CaO, BaO, SrO, Al2O3, SiO2, MgTiO3, CaTiO3, BaTiO3, SrTiO3, ZrO2, TiO2, B2O3, Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 and PbTiO3, at least one of which may be used either by itself or in combination. No matter which of these insulators is selected, the effect of the present invention will show up clearly if the mixture ratio is determined such that the dielectric constant becomes equal to or greater than the predetermined value described above. The glass material is preferably so-called “low-melting glass” such as borosilicate glass, of which the glass transition temperature is 600° C. or less, because the manufacturing process would be facilitated in that case.
The at least one electrode that either faces or contacts with the first insulator at least partially is preferably covered with an insulating layer in order to increase the durability of the electrode. Furthermore, the insulating layer preferably includes an alkaline earth metal oxide. This is because such a layer would protect the electrode from the impact of electrons and ions and would eventually increase the durability of the device overall. More specifically, the insulating layer preferably includes at least one material selected from the group consisting of Y2O3, Li2O, MgO, CaO, BaO, SrO, Al2O3, SiO2, MgTiO3, CaTiO3, BaTiO3, SrTiO3, ZrO2, TiO2, B2O3, Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 and PbTiO3.
In any of the light-emitting devices described above, it is preferable that the surface layer of the emitter is porous. If a predetermined voltage is applied between either two electrodes that sandwich the emitter or two electrodes arranged on one side of the emitter, a so-called “creeping discharge” phenomenon that electrons flow through the emitter will occur. It should be noted that the “creeping discharge” is sometimes called “surface discharge”, which is quite different from the surface discharge phenomenon in the field of PDPs. Specifically, the surface discharge in the field of PDPs means electrical discharge that is produced between electrodes provided for a front-side panel, whereas the creeping discharge will refer herein to electrical discharge that is produced either on the surface layer of the emitter or inside a porous emitter.
If the surface layer of the emitter is porous, the creeping discharge will occur there like an avalanche and will last a while, thus stabilizing the luminance. Furthermore, if the entire emitter is porous, then the creeping discharge will occur not just on the surface, but also inside, of the porous emitter, and light can be emitted from the centers of emission in the fluorescent particles more efficiently. That is why this embodiment is even more preferable. The fluorescent particles may be spherical, needle-like, whisker-like or plate-like ones. In any case, if the emitter is formed by compacting powder particles, a porous status can be more easily created eventually.
In any of the light-emitting devices described above, a gas is preferably present between the emitter and the at least one electrode that either faces or contacts with the first insulator at least partially, and the gas preferably includes at least oxygen or nitrogen. Since emission of light is not affected even if the gas includes oxygen or nitrogen, gas substitution is substantially unnecessary. On top of that, the display can be fabricated more easily and in a shorter time, which are advantages. Also, the gas preferably includes at least oxygen or nitrogen, and the total of oxygen and nitrogen preferably accounts for at least 1 vol % of the gas. Even if gas includes 1% or more of oxygen and nitrogen, the light-emitting device of the present invention can still emit light without decreasing its luminance. Furthermore, the gas preferably includes at least oxygen or nitrogen and xenon gas preferably accounts for 2 vol % or less of the gas. Even if the gas includes 2% or less xenon, emission of light is still possible without diminishing the effect of the present invention. In this way, the light-emitting device of the present invention does not have to change gases using an airtight system as is required by a PDP, and strict control of the gas is not required in the manufacturing process of the display and the overall manufacturing process time can be shortened, all of which are beneficial. Optionally, it is not impossible to use a rare gas as an electrical discharge gas. The rare gas may be used to decrease the electrical discharge voltage. The gas preferably has a pressure of 5×103 Pa to 9×104 Pa.
In one preferred embodiment, each portion of the first insulator has a rib structure that protrudes from the second insulator toward the substrate.
In another preferred embodiment, those portions of the first insulator define barriers that divide a plurality of self-emitting cells from each other between the second insulator and the substrate.
In this particular preferred embodiment, a gap is left between the barriers and the substrate.
Another light-emitting device according to the present invention includes: two substrates, at least one of which transmits light; a plurality of cells, which are interposed between the two substrates and each of which emits light; and an electrode structure for applying a voltage to each of those cells. Each of the cells includes an emitter layer including a fluorescent substance and a gas layer. When a voltage is applied to the electrode structure, electrical discharge is produced in the gas layer and electrons collide against the fluorescent substance, thereby emitting light by electron excitation.
In one preferred embodiment, the ratio of that volume of the emitter to the combined volume of the gas layer and the emitter in each cell is greater than 0.4 but smaller than 1.
In another preferred embodiment, the average thickness of the gas layer is smaller than that of the emitter in each cell.
The light-emitting device of the present invention includes an emitter, accounting for a greater volume percentage than the gas layer, and therefore, can emit light using not only the radiation produced by the electrical discharge of the gas layer but also the creeping discharge of the emitter, thus achieving higher luminance. In addition, according to the present invention, a broader margin is allowed for a variation in the thickness of the emitter and restriction on the gas layer's electrical discharge conditions are also relaxed. As a result, the emitter can be made by adopting thick film process technologies and the gas layer could be the air, too.
Consequently, according to the present invention, the manufacturing process can be simplified, the productivity can be improved, and a quality display device can be provided at a reduced cost. The light-emitting device of the present invention achieves luminance that is at least almost as high as, and even higher than, that of PDPs or ELDs, and would contribute immensely to further reducing the thickness, increasing the screen size, and raising the definition of those displays.
Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. First, the structure of a light-emitting device according to a first specific preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to
As shown in
In this preferred embodiment, BaTiO3 is used as the second insulator 5. However, the same effect would be achieved even if an insulator such as SrTiO3, CaTiO3, MgTiO3, Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 or PbTiO3 is used. Also, when an insulator such as Al2O3, MgO or ZrO2 was used, a similar effect was achieved but the luminance decreased compared to a situation where an insulator with a high relative dielectric constant was used. Nevertheless, such a decrease in luminance could be compensated for by increasing the capacitance with the thickness of the insulator reduced. An insulating layer may also be formed by a thin film deposition process such as a sputtering process, a CVD process, an evaporation process or a sol-gel process.
If a sintered body is used as the second insulator 5, the second insulator 5 may serve as the lower substrate 20. In that case, the lower substrate 20 may be omitted. The thickness of the insulator 5 would change significantly if a sintered body were used or if a thick film deposition process were adopted. Actually, the required capacitance may be adjusted with respect to the relative dielectric constant. Also, no matter whether or not the second insulator 5 serves as the lower substrate, the effect of the present invention can be achieved if the third electrode 10 contacts with a side of the insulator that faces the lower substrate or if the third electrode 10 is covered with the insulator 5.
Then, the first insulator 4 is deposited on the second insulator 5 such that multiple portions of the first insulator 4 face each other. Specifically, paste is prepared by compounding 50 wt % of α-terpineol with 50 wt % of ceramic (e.g. SrTiO3) and glass (having a weight ratio of one to one) mixed particles. Next, the paste is screen-printed in a predetermined pattern, and then thermally treated and solidified at a temperature of 400° C. to 580° C. for 2 to 5 hours, thereby depositing the first insulator 4 to a thickness of about 3 μm to about 500 μm as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Then, as shown in
In this preferred embodiment, the surface of the fluorescent particles may be coated with a layer of a metal oxide such as MgO. Then, the creeping discharge can be produced efficiently and the fluorescent particles can be protected from the impact of ions. An MgO layer may be formed on the surface of the fluorescent particles in the following manner, for example. First, a solution including Mg(OC2H5)2 powder (1 molar ratio), which is a metal alkoxide, CH3COOH (10 molar ratio), H2O (50 molar ratio) and C2H5OH (50 molar ratio), is stirred up and mixed well at room temperature to prepare an almost transparent sol-gel solution. Then, fluorescent particles (2 molar ratio) are added little by little to this sol-gel solution and stirred up together. This series of process steps is continued for one day. Thereafter, the mixed solution is subjected to a centrifugal separation. The resultant powder is put in a ceramic vat, and then dried at 150° C. for one whole day. After that, the dried powder is calcined at a temperature of 400° C. to 600° C. in the air for 2 to 5 hours, thereby forming a uniform layer of MgO on the surface of the fluorescent particles.
The emitter 2 is formed so as to emit light in red (R), green (G) or blue (B). In an actual display device, a layer of the emitter 2 is printed in a predetermined pattern (e.g. in stripes) for each one of the emission colors after another, thereby forming an emitter 2 in which such patterns are arranged regularly. Alternatively, an emitter 2 that can emit white light may be once formed, and then the white light may be separated into respective colors with color filters such that emission in a desired color can be obtained.
After the emitter 2 has been printed in this manner, a heat treatment is conducted at about 600° C. for 10 to 60 minutes in the air, thereby setting the thickness of the emitter 2 within the range of 3 μm to 500 μm. In this preferred embodiment, the emitter 2 is formed after the first insulator 4 has been deposited. However, the emitter 2 may also be formed earlier than the first insulator 4.
The paste described above was prepared by adding an organic binder or an organic solvent to the fluorescent particles. However, the same effect was achieved even when a paste was prepared by adding a colloidal silica aqueous solution to the fluorescent particles. It should be noted that if the colloidal silica aqueous solution is added, there is no need to conduct a heat treatment in the process step of forming the emitter, and therefore, oxidation of the fluorescent material can be reduced more significantly.
After the first insulator 4 has been deposited as described above, the emitter 2 is covered with a light-transmitting substrate 8 of glass, for example, thereby completing the light-emitting device of the first preferred embodiment shown in
The distance between the emitter 2 and the first electrode 6 or between the emitter 2 and the second electrode 7, where the gas layer 9 is present, may be at least as long as the mean free path of the gas molecules. Therefore, the actual thickness of the emitter 2 preferably falls within the range of 20 μm to 500 μm to facilitate the manufacturing process, more preferably within the range of more than 30 μm to 250 μm. In the light-emitting device of this preferred embodiment, the discharge start voltage changes with the distance between each electrode 6 or 7 and the emitter 2. That is why if the upper limit of these ranges were exceeded, then it would be difficult to control the distance as intended during the manufacturing process, and the discharge start voltage would vary much more significantly.
As the light-transmitting substrate 8 including transparent electrodes of Ag as the first and second electrodes 6 and 7, a light-transmitting substrate with ITO interconnects, not Ag, may also be used. ITO has much higher electrical resistance than Ag. For that reason, care should be taken of increase in emission voltage, heat generation and disconnection. Examples of alternative electrode materials include gold, copper, titanium and aluminum.
In this manner, the light-emitting device 1 of the first preferred embodiment is obtained. However, if a light-emitting device is fabricated with only the first electrode 6 arranged on the light-transmitting substrate 8, a light-emitting device 1 according to a second preferred embodiment of the present invention shown in
In the preferred embodiments described above, when the emitter 2 is formed, a paste is prepared based on a powder of fluorescent particles with an organic binder or an organic solvent added thereto if necessary. However, by changing those materials or heat treatment conditions, a porous emitter 2 can be obtained eventually. Specifically, concerning the heat treatment conditions, if a heat resistant ceramic plate is used as the lower substrate 20, then the heat treatment can be carried out in a relatively broad temperature range of 400° C. to 600° C. If a paste is prepared by adding the organic binder or organic solvent mentioned above, then a high temperature heat treatment should be carried out in the air, and the luminance characteristics would vary easily due to oxidation of the fluorescent particles, which is a problem. Specifically, BaMgAl10O17: Eu2+, for example, emits blue light when excited by Eu2+ as the center of emission. However, if Eu2+ changed into Eu3+ due to oxidation during the heat treatment, then red light would be emitted. That is why as for the emitter 2, it would be not only more beneficial in terms of luminance characteristic but also more economical, too, to use a paste, prepared by adding a colloidal silica aqueous solution of an inorganic binder instead of the organic binder, and then dry it at a temperature of 120° C. to 150° C. In the preferred embodiments described above, the porosity of the emitter 2 is at least 10% and most preferably 30% to 70%. If the porosity were less than 10% (i.e., if the emitter could no longer be called “porous”), then the emission phenomenon itself would be affected a little but the creeping discharge could no longer be sustained for a sufficiently long time inside the emitter 2. As a result, the resultant luminous efficacy would drop significantly compared to that of a porous emitter.
Next, it will be described with reference to
As an alternative preferred embodiment, a light-emitting device 1, in which only the first electrode 6 and a third electrode 10 are arranged, will be described with reference to
By changing the waveforms of the AC electric field to be applied from a sine wave or a saw-tooth wave into a rectangular wave or by increasing the frequency from several tens of Hz to several thousands of Hz, the emission of electrons is activated very much and the luminance increases.
According to the present invention, by increasing the average thickness of the emitter 2 with respect to that of the gas layer 9 in each cell, the luminance is increased by a different light emission mechanism from that of a PDP. In other words, according to the present invention, the ratio of the volume of the emitter 2 to the total volume of the gas layer 9 and the emitter 2 combined in each cell is defined to be greater than 0.5 but less than 1. The meaning of this setting may be explained as follows using a cross-sectional view such as that shown in
Supposing the first insulator 4 is extended to reach the light-transmitting substrate 8 on a plane that is viewed perpendicularly to the surface of the second insulator 5 and that passes the center of the cell, the cross-sectional area of a range surrounded with the first and second insulators 4, 5 and the light-transmitting substrate 8 is identified by A1 and the cross-sectional area A2 of the emitter 2 is identified by A2. In that case, according to the present invention, the A2/A1 ratio is defined to be greater than 0.4 but less than 1 (preferably, greater than 0.5 but less than 1). The reason why the A2/A1 ratio is set within such a range will be described below.
In each of the preferred embodiments described above, the emission status was studied with the A2/A1 ratio of the area A1 of the emitter 2 to the area A2 of such a range surrounded with the first insulator 4, the second insulator 5 and light-transmitting substrate 8 changed. It should be noted that the light-transmitting substrate 8 refers herein to a substrate arranged at the outermost position of the light-emitting device, not to a light-transmitting film or layer covering the electrodes 6, 7. Specifically a plurality of light-emitting devices were provided. In each of those light-emitting devices, paste including the fluorescent particles described above was solidified as the emitter 2 by a screen-printing process such that the ratio of the area of the emitter 2 to a predetermined cross-sectional area became 3%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 35%, 40%, 55%, 65%, 75%, 85% or 95%, and the luminance of each light-emitting device was measured under the following conditions.
The first insulator 4 was formed so as to have different heights in the column and row directions, and the lower height of the first insulator 4 was defined to be 100 μm. If the emitter 2 had an A2/A1 ratio of 3%, 5% or 10% as shown in
Conversely, if the A2/A1 ratio is 20%, 35%, 40%, 55%, 65% or 75%, the fluorescent particles were excited as a result of both the ultraviolet excitation and electron excitation and the luminance increased, so did the brightness. However, when the A2/A1 ratio was less than 40%, the luminance did not increase sufficiently. Also, if the emitter 2 was porous, the luminance further increased at 55%, 65% and 75%, i.e., when the A2/A1 ratio was more than 40% to less than 80% as shown in
Thus, it was discovered that to increase the luminance by getting light emitted from the emitter 2 based on the radiation produced by the electrical discharge in the gas layer 9 and producing light through the electron excitation in the emitter 2, the A2/A1 ratio should be set greater than 40%. Also, if there was no gas layer 9 at all, sufficient light could not be produced. For these reasons, the A2/A1 ratio needs to be greater than 0.4 but less than 1. A more preferable lower limit of the A2/A1 ratio may be defined as more than 0.5 and may even be more than 0.6.
As described above, the light-emitting device of this preferred embodiment can emit light by utilizing both ultraviolet excitation and electron excitation, and therefore, the cross-sectional area of the emitter 2 can account for a greater percentage, which is advantageous. On top of that, the third electrode 10 is arranged and the electric field is controlled, thus producing dielectric breakdown of the gas more easily with an electric field applied between the first electrode 6 and the second electrode 7. Also, as capacitance is proportional to dielectric constant, a greater percentage of electrons would migrate on the surfaces of the first and second insulators with low impedances. Likewise, the percentage of electrons migrating on the surface or inside of the emitter 2 also increases. As a result, the emitted electrons also collide against the emitter 2. Also, the electric field applied to the third electrode 10 may be controlled such that a lot of electrons will collide with, and penetrate deep into, the emitter 2 or that electrons will be emitted so as not to collide with the emitter 2.
In the preferred embodiments described above, the device is driven in the air. However, the present inventors confirmed that light was also emitted in a similar manner even in oxygen gas alone, nitrogen gas alone, a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen at any mixture ratio, or in a gas with a reduced pressure. We also confirmed that light was also emitted in a similar manner even when a mixture in which 2% or less of xenon gas was added to the various gases mentioned above was used.
In the light-emitting device of the preferred embodiments described above, the emitter is formed by a thick film deposition process. That is why the thickness of each layer being deposited does not have to be controlled so strictly as in fabricating a conventional light-emitting device. In addition, since no vacuum system or carrier multiplication layer is needed, the structure can be simplified and the manufacturing and patterning processing can be done easily, too. In an emitter with a porous structure, not only its surface as in ordinary fluorescent material but also the entire emitter can emit light uniformly because impinging electrons reach deep inside of the emitter with a porous structure. Furthermore, compared to the emission of light by a fluorescent material using ultraviolet radiation as is done by a plasma display, the luminous efficacy is much higher. As a result, a light-emitting device that would have relatively low power dissipation when used in a huge-screen display and that has such a structure as to realize high definition relatively easily can be provided. By arranging a first insulator that functions as an electrical discharge separation means as a barrier surrounding the emitter on all four sides, the crosstalk of the light emitted can be avoided easily.
In a light-emitting device according to the present invention, the emitter can be formed by a thick film deposition process, for example. That is why the thickness of each layer being deposited does not have to be controlled so strictly as in fabricating a conventional light-emitting device. In addition, since no vacuum system or carrier multiplication layer is needed, the structure can be simplified and the manufacturing and patterning processes can be done easily, too. Furthermore, since the light-emitting device achieves higher luminous efficacy than a PDP, this light-emitting device can be used particularly effectively in various types of displays, among other things.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-110602 | Apr 2005 | JP | national |
| 2005-239343 | Aug 2005 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2006/307347 | 4/6/2006 | WO | 00 | 10/4/2007 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2006/109681 | 10/19/2006 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5453661 | Auciello et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5631664 | Adachi et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 6242860 | Sasao et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249264 | Sano et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6285129 | Park et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6540576 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6603264 | Hirao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6632116 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 7541733 | Ueno et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 20020036466 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180355 | Mori et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030137234 | Aoki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040061442 | Yuki et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040183439 | Aoki et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050001550 | Shinoda et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050035715 | Kado et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050067957 | Moon | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050174037 | Ueno et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20070069235 | Ueno et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205964 | Nagaki | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1420435 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1 510 565 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 06-283269 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| 7-64490 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 08-083686 | Mar 1996 | JP |
| 2001-283734 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2001-312963 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2004-071434 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 2004-200143 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005-011743 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 10-2004-0108268 | Dec 2004 | KR |
| WO 03097769 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004016049 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005051045 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005101358 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090236964 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
