The present invention relates to a light emitting diode (LED) driver, and more particularly, to a circuit for driving a string of light emitting diode (LEDs).
Due to the concept of low energy consumption, LED lamps are prevailing and considered a practice for lighting in the era of energy shortage. Typically, an LED lamp includes a string of LEDs to provide the needed light output. The string of LEDs can be arranged either in parallel or in series or a combination of both. Regardless of the arrangement type, providing correct voltage and/or current is essential to efficient operation of the LEDs.
In application where the power source is periodic, the LED driver should be able to convert the time varying voltage to the correct voltage and/or current level. Typically, the voltage conversion is performed by circuitry commonly known as AC/DC converters. These converters, which employ an inductor or transformer, capacitor, and/or other components, are large in size and have short life, which results in an undesirable form factor in lamp design, high manufacturing cost, and reduction in system reliability. Accordingly, there is a need for an LED driver that is reliable and has a small form factor to thereby reduce the manufacturing cost.
In one embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for driving light emitting diodes (LEDs) includes: providing a string of LEDs divided into groups, the groups being electrically connected to each other in series; providing a power source electrically connected to the string of LEDs; coupling each of the groups to a ground through a separate current regulating circuit, the separate current regulating circuit including a cascode structure having first and second transistors; and increasing an input voltage from the power source to turn on the groups in a downstream sequence.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, a driver circuit for driving light emitting diodes (LEDs) includes: a string of LEDs divided into n groups, the n groups of LEDs being electrically connected to each other in series, a downstream end of group m−1 being electrically connected to the upstream end of group m, where m being a positive number equal to or less than n; a power source coupled to an upstream end of group 1 and operative to provide an input voltage; a plurality of current regulating circuits, each of the current regulating circuits being coupled to the downstream end of a corresponding group at one end and coupled to a ground at the other end and including a cascode having first and second transistors and a sensor amplifier.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following drawings, description and claims.
Referring now to
The LEDs as used herein is the general term for many different kinds of light emitting diodes, such as traditional LED, super-bright LED, high brightness LED, organic LED, etc. The drivers of the present invention are applicable to all kinds of LED.
As depicted in
A separate current regulating circuit (or, shortly regulating circuit) is connected to the downstream end of each LED group, where the current regulating circuit collectively refers to a group of elements for regulating the current flow, say i1, and includes a first transistor (say, UHV1), a second transistor (say, M1), and a sensor amplifier (say, SA1). Hereinafter, the term transistor refers to an N-Channel MOSFET, a P-Channel MOSFET, an NPN-bipolar transistor, a PNP-bipolar transistor, an Insulated gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT), analog switch, or a relay.
The first and second transistors are electrically connected in series, forming a cascode structure. The first transistor is capable of shielding the second transistor from high voltages. As such, the first transistor is referred as shielding transistor hereinafter, even though its function is not limited to shielding the second transistor. The main function of the second transistor includes regulating the current i1, and as such, the second transistor is referred as regulating transistor hereinafter. The shielding transistor may be an ultra-high-voltage (UHV) transistor that has a high breakdown voltage of 500 V, for instance, while the regulating transistor M1 may be a low-voltage (LV), medium-voltage (MV), or a high-voltage (HV) transistor and has a lower breakdown voltage than the shielding transistor. The node, such as N1, refers to the point where the source of the shielding transistor is connected to the drain of the regulating transistor.
The sensor amplifier SA1, which may be an operational amplifier, compares the voltage V1 with the reference voltage Vref, and outputs a signal that is input to the gate of the regulating transistor, to thereby form a feedback control of the current i1 flowing through the cascode and the resistors R1, R2, R3, and R4. The gate voltage of the shielding transistor may be set to a constant voltage, Vcc2. (Hereinafter, Vcc2 refers to a constant voltage.) The mechanism for generating the constant gate voltage Vcc2 is well known in the art, and as such, the detailed description of the mechanism is not described in the present document.
As discussed above, each current regulating circuit is electrically connected to the downstream end of the corresponding LED group at one end and to the ground at the other end via the current sensing resistors. The voltages V1, V2, V3, and V4 represent the electrical potentials at the downstream ends of the regulating transistors M1, M2, M3, and M4, respectively. Thus, for instance, the voltage V1 can be represented by the equation:
V1=i1*(R1+R2+R3+R4)+i2*(R2+R3+R4)+i3*(R3+R4)+i4*R4.
The driver 10 can turn on/off each group of LEDs successively as the level of Vrect changes. As the voltage of the power source starts increasing from zero, Vrect may not be high enough to cause the electrical current to flow through the LEDs. At this stage, the voltages V1, V2, V3 and V4 are lower than the reference voltage Vref, and thus, the sensor amplifiers SA1, SA2, SA3, and SA4 turn on the regulating transistors M1, M2, M3, and M4, respectively.
As the voltage of the power source increases enough to turn on the first LED group, LED1 (or Group 1), that is located immediately downstream of the power source, the first regulating circuit, i.e., UHV1, M1, and SA1, conducts and the current i1 flows to the ground. Note that the first current regulating circuit may be turned on before, at, or after the rectified voltage Vrect reaches a level enough to power LED1. The same analogy applies to other regulating circuits corresponding to Groups 2-4. When Vrect is high enough to power LED1 but not enough to turn on LED2, the sensor amplifier SA1 compares the voltage level V1 with the reference voltage Vref and sends a control signal to the regulating transistor, M1. More specifically, the output signal of the sensor amplifier SA1 is input to the gate of the regulating transistor M1.
As Vrect increases, it reaches a level enough to power LED1 and LED2. Then, the second regulating circuit (i.e., UHV2, M2, and SA2) conducts, and LED1 and LED2 are turned on. As discussed above, the second current regulating circuit may be turned on before, at, or after Vrect reaches the level enough to power LED1 and LED2. The sensor amplifier SA2 compares the voltage level V2 with Vref and sends a control signal to the regulating transistor, M2.
When the second current regulating circuit is on, the overall efficiency of the driver 10 will be enhanced if the current i1 is cut off (or, set to a minimal level). It is because LED2 would produce more light if more current flows therethough, and, cutting off (or reducing) the current i1 would cause the current i1 to be redirected to LED2. In the driver 10, as the current i2 starts flowing, the voltage V1 further increases and exceeds Vref at some point in time. At this point, the SA1 sends a signal to M1, to thereby shut off the current i1.
Same analogy applies for subsequent groups. Generally speaking, when a downstream LED group is turned on and the current regulating circuit associated with the downstream group conducts, the current regulating circuit associated with upstream groups can be turned off (or, the current flowing through the regulating circuit is set to a minimal level) to enhance the overall efficiency of the driver circuit 10.
Once the source voltage (or the rectified voltage Vrect) reaches its peak and starts descending, the above process reverses so that the first current regulating circuit turns back on last. Note that as the source voltage decreases to a level insufficient to keep the downstream group on, the downstream group is naturally turned off even though its associated regulating circuit might be on.
As discussed above, each regulating circuit includes two transistors, such as UHV1 and M1, arranged in series to form a cascode structure. The cascode structure, which is implemented as a current sink, has various advantages compared to a single transistor current sink. First, it has enhanced current driving capability. When operating in its saturation region, which is desired for a current sink, the current driving capability (Idrv) of an LV/MV/HV NMOS is far superior to an UHV NMOS. For example, Idrv of a typical LV NMOS is 500 μA/μm whereas that of a typical UHV NMOS is 10˜20 μA/μm. Thus, to regulate the same amount of current flow, the required projection area of an UHV NMOS on the chip is at least 20 times as large as that of an LV NMOS. Also, a typical UHV NMOS has the minimum channel length of 20 μm, while a typical LV NMOS has the minimum channel length of 0.5 μm. However, a typical LV NMOS requires a shielding mechanism that offers protection from high voltages. In the cascode structure, the first transistor, preferably UHV NMOS, operates as a shielding transistor, while the second transistor, preferably LV/MV/HV NMOS, operates as a current regulator, providing enhanced current driving capability. The shielding transistor is not operating in saturation region as would be in the case where a single UHV NMOS is used as the current sink and operated in the linear region. As such, the current driving capability Idrv is not the determinative design factor; rather the resistance of the shielding transistor, Rdson, is the important factor in designing the UHV NMOS of the cascode.
Second, due to the series configuration of the cascode structure, the required voltage (a.k.a. voltage compliance or voltage headroom) of the cascode structure can be higher than a single UHV NMOS configuration. For an LED driver case, however, the power loss due to the required voltage is much less than the power loss due to the LED driving voltage. For example, in an AC-driven LED driver case, the LED driving voltage (voltage on the LED anode) ranges 100 Vmrs˜250 Vrms. Assume the required voltage of a single UHV NMOS is 2V whereas that of a cascode structure is 5V. In this case, the efficiencies are 98˜99% and 95˜98%, respectively. Of course, Rdson can be reduced so that the required voltage of the cascode structure can be about the same as that of a single UHV NMOS. The point is that the additional power consumed by the cascode structure is a minor disadvantage. If efficiency is a crucial design factor, the cascode structure can be designed in a current mirror configuration whereas a current mirror configuration using two UHV NMOS transistors is not practically feasible due to their large area on the chip.
Third, turning on/off the current sink is easier in the cascode structure since the UHV MOS and LV/MV/HV NMOS are controlled separately. In a single UHV NMOS current sink, both current regulation and on/off action have to be done by controlling the gate of the UHV NMOS, which has the characteristics of a large capacitor. In contrast, in the cascode structure, the current regulation can be done by controlling the LV/MV/HV NMOS and on/off action can be done by controlling the UHV NMOS that requires only logic operation applied on the gate.
Fourth, the speed of turning on/off is controlled more smoothly in the cascode structure than a single UHV NMOS configuration. In a single UHV NMOS configuration, the linear control of current cannot be easily achieved by controlling the gate voltage since the current is a square function of the gate voltage. By contrast, in a cascode structure, when the gate of the LV/MV/HV NMOS is controlled, the current control (slewing) becomes smoother since it is operating as a resistor that is an inverse function of the gate voltage.
Fifth, the cascode structure provides better noise immunity. Noise from the power supply can propagate through the LEDs and subsequently can be coupled to the current regulating circuit. More specifically, the noise is introduced into the feedback loop of the current regulating circuit. In a single UHV NMOS configuration, this noise is directly coupled to this loop, whereas, in a cascode structure, the noise is attenuated by the ratio of Rdson of the UHV NMOS to the effective resistance of the LV/MV/HV NMOS.
Sixth, the noise generated by a cascode structure is lower than a single UHV NMOS configuration. In the cascode structure, the current control is mainly performed by the regulating transistor, while, in a single UHV NMOS configuration, the current control is performed by the UHV NMOS. Since the gate capacitance of the LV/MV/HV NMOS is lower than the UHV NMOS, the noise generated by the cascode structure is lower than a single UHV NMOS configuration.
It is noted that the shielding transistors UHV1˜UHV4 may be identical or different from each other. Likewise, the regulating transistors M1˜M4 may be identical or different from each other. The specifications of the shielding and regulating transistors may be selected to meet the designer's objectives.
The same analogy applies to the other detectors. For instance, the detector 2 monitors the voltage level at the node 3 and sends a signal to the sensor amplifier SA2 to control the current flow i2. It is noted that the sensor amplifier SA2 also compares the reference voltage Vref to the voltage V2 to control the gate voltage of the regulating transistor M2. Thus, the sensor amplifier SA2 takes three input voltages to control the current flow i2; the voltage level at the node N3, the voltage V2 at the downstream end of the regulating transistor M2, and the reference voltage Vref.
The same analogy applies to the other detectors. For instance, the detector 2 monitors the voltage level at the node 3 and sends an output signal to UHV2 to control the current flow i2. It is noted that UHV4, the first transistor of the current regulating circuit associated with LED4, the last LED group, has a constant gate voltage Vcc2.
The same analogy applies to the other sensor amplifiers. For instance, the sensor amplifier SA3 sends an output signal to UHV2 to control the current flow i2. It is noted that UHV4, the first transistor of the current regulating circuit associated with LED4, the last LED group, has a constant gate voltage Vcc2.
Vref=Iref*R,
where Iref and R represent current and resistor, respectively.
The current regulating circuit 84 may be used in place of the current regulating circuit 80 of
It is noted that only two reference voltages Vref1 and Vref2 are used for each switch of the driver circuits 30 and 50. However, it should be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that more than two references voltages may be used for each switch.
As depicted in
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Applications No. 61/422,128, filed on Dec. 11, 2010, entitled “Light emitting diode driver using turn-on voltage of light emitting diode,” and relates U.S. application Ser. No. 13/244,892, filed on Sep. 26, 2011, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,890,432 on Nov. 18, 2014, entitled “Light emitting diode driver,” and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/244,900, filed on Sep. 26, 2011, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,018,856 on Apr. 28, 2015, entitled “Light emitting diode driver having phase control mechanism,” which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6989807 | Chiang | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7081722 | Huynh et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7439944 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
8901849 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20060175985 | Huynh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208669 | Huynh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080116817 | Chao et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090128055 | Shin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100156307 | Kim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100194298 | Kuwabara | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100265271 | Chang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100308738 | Shteynberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308739 | Shteynberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110062872 | Jin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110273102 | Van De Ven et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120081009 | Shteynberg et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120217887 | Kang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120229030 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007-123562 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-173813 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2010-225742 | Oct 2010 | JP |
10-2008-0034316 | Apr 2008 | KR |
10-2009-0050381 | May 2009 | KR |
10-0905844 | Jul 2009 | KR |
10-2010-0067468 | Jun 2010 | KR |
10-0973014 | Jul 2010 | KR |
10-0997050 | Nov 2010 | KR |
2012-034102 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012-061999 | May 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120146514 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61422128 | Dec 2010 | US |