The present invention relates to a truss system used in the construction of commercial and residential buildings. More particularly, the present invention relates to a truss system using roll-formed light gauge metal truss members and fixtures.
In the construction field, structural members and fixtures are increasingly formed from light gauge metal due to the rising cost and declining quality of wood. Components formed from light gauge metal are preferred over wood in many applications because the metal components are lighter in weight, stronger, consistent in quality, not subject to shrinkage, and resistant to fire and insect infestation.
In producing the most economical light gauge metal truss system, it is desirable to roll form the elongated truss members with a cross-sectional configuration designed to achieve maximum strength of the member to meet the required structural codes while minimizing the weight of the metal used. A number of roll-formed light gauge metal truss chord members have been developed having different cross-sectional configurations. Typically such truss members have been formed with C-shaped or Z-shaped cross-sections which suffer from low strength-to-weight ratios. More recently, truss members have been formed with generally U-shaped cross-sections having a pair of substantially parallel legs extending from a base portion.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,986,051 to Meyer et al. dated Jan. 22, 1991; U.S. Pat. No. 5,417,028 to Meyer dated May 23, 1995; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,653 to Dolati et al. dated Jun. 30, 1998, each disclose an elongated truss chord member of light gauge metal having a generally U-shaped cross-section. The prior art chord members include in cross-section a pair of legs extending from a base portion. Each of the legs includes a recessed web attachment face so that the pair of web attachment faces are spaced apart a distance less than the width of the base portion. The legs terminate in an outwardly turned stiffening flange to improve the strength-to-weight ratio of the members. The outwardly turned stiffening flange also provides an outer face adjacent the distal end of each leg so that the cross-sectional width of the chord members at the base portion is substantially the same as the cross-sectional width of the chord member at the distal end of the legs to facilitate stacking and transport of the trusses, and engagement of the truss chord members with other structural members or fixture.
The prior art teaches the use of an inclined face in the portion of the chord member interconnecting the recessed web attachment face with the base. The inclined faces in each leg extend inward toward the opposite leg so that the web attachment faces are spaced apart a distance less than the width of the base. Truss chord members including inwardly extending inclined faces to interconnect the web attachment face and the base have several drawbacks. For example, it is desirable in a truss chord member to provide a wide web attachment face to thereby facilitate the attachment of the chord member to structural members received between the web attachment faces. In a member including an inwardly extending inclined face interconnecting the web attachment face and the base, the inclined face comprises a portion of the overall longitudinal width of the leg, thus the longitudinal width of the web attachment face relative to the overall longitudinal width of the leg is reduced.
Further by way of example, the angle of the inclined portion relative to the base may cause difficulties in engaging the chord member with truss clips and other fixtures.
A typical truss includes a plurality of truss web members interconnecting the truss chord members. A number of roll-formed light gauge metal truss web members have been developed having different cross-sectional configurations. Typically such web members have been formed with a C-shaped or H-shaped cross-section which suffer from low strength-to-weight ratios. Truss web members having a box-shaped cross section are favored because the box-shaped cross-sectional configuration eliminates two modes of failure of the members in compression compared to C-shaped or H-shaped members. However, box-shaped members are difficult to fabricate which adds to the expense of fabricating the truss and reduces the flexibility in providing trusses of differing dimensions.
It is known to fabricate a box-shaped member by nesting two C-shaped members. French Patent No. 939,599 dated Jan. 8, 1947, discloses an elongated member having a box-shaped cross section formed by nesting two elongated C-shaped members each having one longer flange and one shorter flange. The above-referenced French patent does not disclose or suggest structural members having sufficient size and strength to bear the loads subjected to a web member in a long span truss. Heretofore, such two-piece box-shaped members have not been made in such sizes or used as load bearing web members in trusses.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a novel truss system in which the structural members and fixtures are formed from light gauge metal.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel truss chord member which is easily roll formed having a cross-section that optimizes the strength of the member for the weight of the metal used.
It is another object of the invention to provide a truss system with truss chord members having wide web attachment faces.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a truss system with truss chord members which easily engage truss clips and other fixtures.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a truss system with truss chord members which are easily stacked and nested for efficient shipment.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a novel truss web member that is easily roll formed having a cross-section that optimizes the strength of the member for the weight of the metal used and provides flexibility in sizing for different size truss chord members.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a novel truss web member having a box-shaped cross section that may be easily roll formed in different sizes.
Trusses are typically fabricated with upper and lower truss chord members and a plurality of interconnecting web members. Each of the web members having one end attached to an upper chord member and the other end attached to a lower chord member. The number and location of the web members is determined by the type of truss being fabricated and the structural requirements for the truss.
In the fabrication of trusses, the various members may be attached to each other by conventional means. Typically, the end portion of a web member is received between the web attachment faces of the chord member and attached thereto by self tapping screws or other conventional means. It is known to provide one or more pre-positioned holes along the length of structural members to facilitate the attachment of the members by screws or other conventional attachment means. U.S. Pat. No. 4,720,957 to Madray discloses a series of pre-positioned holes formed along the entire length of a C-shaped structural member. However, in the fabrication of trusses it is not necessary or desirable to pre-position holes along the entire length of the chord member. The pre-positioned holes need only be located along the portions of the chord member where a web member will be attached. Limiting the pre-positioned holes to one or more portions along the length of the chord member reduces the time and expense associated with forming the holes and provides an additional aid in properly positioning the web members.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a novel truss system and method of fabricating trusses which obviate the deficiencies of the known systems and methods.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a novel apparatus and method for positioning web members in a light gauge metal truss.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a novel apparatus and method for roll forming truss chord members from a blank of light gauge metal.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a novel apparatus and method for forming the peak of a light gauge metal truss.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a novel apparatus and method for securing a truss from uplifting forces.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a novel apparatus and method for connecting one or more trusses together.
These and many other objects and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art to which the invention pertains from a perusal of the claims, the appended drawings, and the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
a and 8b is an illustration of one embodiment of a truss clip according to the present invention.
c illustrates the engagement of the truss clip illustrated in
The present invention is directed to truss systems wherein the structural members and fixtures are formed from light gauge metal. The gauge of the metal may vary depending upon the specific application, but is typically selected from the gauges of metal including 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22.
The stiffening flange 42 includes a lateral face 46 extending outwardly from the distal longitudinal edge of the web attachment face 40 at a substantially right angle thereto and an outer flange face 48 extending from the outer edge of the lateral face 46 toward the base 32. The first outer face 38 and the outer flange face 48 are substantially coplanar so that the cross-sectional width of the chord member 30 is substantially the same at the base 32 and the distal ends of the legs 34. The coplanar outer faces 38,48 provide ease of stacking or nesting for transport of the chord members or assembled trusses, and ease of engagement of the members with other structural members and/or fixtures.
The chord member 30 comprises in cross section a base 32 and a pair of web attachment faces 40 spaced apart a distance less than the width of the base 32. The channel formed by the base 32 and the legs 34 is commonly referred to as the “throat” of the chord member and the distance between the web attachment faces is the width of the throat. The distance from the base 32 to the distal ends of legs 34 is the depth of the throat.
Heretofore, light gauge metal truss chord members have not been made with a throat width greater than one and one-half inches. According to one aspect of the present invention, light gauge metal truss chord members are provided having larger than one and one-half inches to provide the required structural capacity for larger span trusses. According to the present invention, the throat may be as wide as two and one-half inches or even wider if the specific application requires.
The overall longitudinal width of the legs 34, i.e., the depth of the throat, may vary according to the specific application. Typically, the depth of the throat may be as shallow as two and one-half inches or as deep as five inches. Other throat depths may be required depending on the specific application. The ratio of the depth of the throat relative to the width of the base may also vary depending on the specific application. The ratio may be greater than one for some applications, or less than one in other applications.
Each leg includes a web attachment face 40 having a lateral face 44 extending from the longitudinal edge 41 of the web attachment face 40 adjacent the base 32 at a substantially right angle thereto. The chord member of the present invention is a significant improvement over the prior art chord members due to the substantially right angle of the lateral face 44 relative to the web attachment face 40 and the first outer face 38. By extending the lateral face 44 from the web attachment face 40 at a substantially right angle as opposed to extending the face at an incline as taught by the prior art, the longitudinal width of the web attachment face 40 relative to the longitudinal width of the leg 34 is increased. A further advantage results from moving more of the mass of the member away from the axis of the member which improves the resistance to bending. Thus a wide web member having improved resistance to bending is provided.
The stiffening flanges 42 provide added structural capacity to the member as well as further providing mass away from the axis of the member. Much of the mass of the member 30 is moved away from the axis of the member similar to an I beam thus improving the resistance to bending of the member. The stiffening flanges 42 also extend laterally from the distal edge 43 of each web attachment face 40 so that the longitudinal width of the web attachment face is maximized to provide a wide attachment face.
It is necessary in the fabrication of trusses to properly position the web members relative to the chord members. To facilitate the proper positioning of the web members, it is desirable to identify the proper position of the web members along the length of the chord members prior to the steps of positioning and attaching the web members in the fabrication of a truss. It has been discovered that the proper position of the web members may be determined during the design of the truss and that the proper position along the length of the chord member for attachment of the web members may be identified along the length of the blank before the chord member is roll formed.
The blank 70 may also include one or more spaced apart apertured portions 74 along the length thereof and one or more apertured portions 76 positioned where the blank 70 will be transversely cut (for example along line C—C) to form a plurality of chord members. The blank is typically cut after being rolled to form the chord members. The apertured portions 74 are positioned in the blank so that when the chord member 80 is formed from the blank the apertured portions 74,76 are located along the web attachment faces 84 of each leg. The apertured portions 74,76 include a plurality of apertures 75 to facilitate the attachment of the chord member 80 to structural members received between the web attachment faces 84. The position of the apertured portions 74 along the length of the blank 70 is determined by the desired positions along the length of the chord member 80 for attachment to one or more web members. The apertures may be formed in the blank by any conventional means such as drilling, stamping, or other conventional means.
With further reference to
With further reference to
In addition to the structural advantages over the prior art of the cross-sectional configuration of the chord member according to the present invention, the configuration provides many advantages in the use of various fixtures in the truss system. For example, in many applications it is desirable to provide resistance to uplifting forces such as wind. With reference to
a and 8b illustrate a truss clip according to the present invention. With reference to
In the construction of commercial and residential buildings, it is often desirable to adjoin abutting trusses, e.g., as in the formation of a hip.
The structural members 112 may be roll formed from light gauge metal. Thus the present invention provides a web member having the advantages of a member with a box-shaped cross section, e.g., the elimination of two modes of failure in compression, which may be easily fabricated in different sizes and gauges of metal.
The web member according to the present invention provides great flexibility in the design of trusses. The web members 110 may be fabricated to withstand the heavy load bearing requirements of long span trusses wherein the throat of the chord members is greater than one and one-half inches. The longer flange 116 is sized to fit within the throat of the truss chord member. For example, a truss web member 110 wherein the distance from the outer surface of the web 114 to the outer surface of the lip 117 is about one and ninety-five one-hundredths of an inch (i.e., the depth of the web member) is adapted to fit a truss chord member having a throat width of two inches. The longitudinal width of the web 114 may vary according to the structural requirements of the specific truss application. The width may be as narrow as about two and one-half inches or as wide as about fourteen inches. Web members which are narrower or wider may also be fabricated if the specific application requires. Generally, the ratio of the width of the web 114 relative to the depth of the member ranges between about two and seven inclusive.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, it is to be understood that the embodiments described are illustrative only and the scope of the invention is to be defined solely by the appended claims when accorded a full range of equivalence, many variations and modifications naturally occurring to those of skill in the art from a perusal hereof.
This Application is a divisional of and claims benefit of application Ser. No. 09/856,531 filed May 29, 2001 now U.S. pat. No. 6,658,809 entitled “LIGHT GAUGE METAL TRUSS SYSTEM AND METHOD”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/207,200, filed May 26, 2000.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1130722 | Fletcher | Mar 1915 | A |
| 2054703 | Little | Sep 1936 | A |
| 2064910 | Harper | Dec 1936 | A |
| 2105771 | Holdsworth | Jan 1938 | A |
| 2311300 | Dubour et al. | Feb 1943 | A |
| 2477163 | Barnett | Jul 1949 | A |
| 2638637 | Kump, Jr. | May 1953 | A |
| 2704868 | Danielson | Mar 1955 | A |
| 2768434 | Taylor | Oct 1956 | A |
| 2770846 | Findleton | Nov 1956 | A |
| 3019866 | Grabowski | Feb 1962 | A |
| 3137098 | Elia et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3144945 | Seiz | Aug 1964 | A |
| 3303937 | McConnell | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3423898 | Coloney et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3656270 | Phillips | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3760550 | Mueller et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3785108 | Satchell | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3845594 | Butts et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3956864 | Fung | May 1976 | A |
| 4201021 | Aldag et al. | May 1980 | A |
| 4329824 | Lowe | May 1982 | A |
| 4435940 | Davenport et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4513551 | Gauffin et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4616453 | Sheppard, Jr. et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4688358 | Madray | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4720957 | Madray | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4773192 | Andrews | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4878323 | Nelson | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4974387 | Dufour | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4982545 | Stromback | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4986051 | Meyer et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4986052 | Nelson | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5010709 | Paz | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5157883 | Meyer | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5417028 | Meyer | May 1995 | A |
| 5457927 | Pellock et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5463837 | Dry | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5625995 | Martin | May 1997 | A |
| 5771653 | Dolati et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5854747 | Fairlie | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857306 | Pellock | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865008 | Larson | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5884448 | Pellock | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5946879 | Pellock | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5970678 | Pellock et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5996303 | Pellock | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009681 | Kozloff | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6073414 | Garris et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6374558 | Surowiecki | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3743970 | Jul 1989 | DE |
| 939599 | Nov 1948 | FR |
| 2062060 | May 1981 | GB |
| 2247033 | Feb 1992 | GB |
| 6057878 | Mar 1994 | JP |
| 418608 | Feb 1967 | SZ |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040118072 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60207200 | May 2000 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09865531 | May 2001 | US |
| Child | 10687832 | US |