The present invention relates to a light metal feed beam for use on a drill rig, in accordance with the preamble of the independent claim. The invention also relates to a drill rig comprising such a feed beam.
Generally (see
One of the most important features of a drill rig is its durability and reliability. All parts of the equipment need to answer to the high demands that are required in the extreme working operations of a drill rig. It is also important that its accuracy can be withheld under these conditions. Therefore, improvements that ameliorate the endurance, accuracy and reliability of the equipment is always sought for. One of the parts that are put under a lot of stress is the feed beam 4.
From EP 0 159 974 B1 it is known to use an extruded light metal feed beam on a drill rig, which feed beam includes guides for guiding a rock drill. An extruded feed beam of light metal has the advantage of being both lighter and straighter than a conventional steel beam. Additionally, there exists a bigger liberty in the design of the extruded aluminium feed beam than for a conventional steel beam. A disadvantage is that aluminium is weaker than steel and that the feed beam has to be made thicker than a conventional steel beam. The feed beam used in EP 0 159 974 B1 is of the open, channel beam type.
In the international patent application No PCT/SE2006/000244 a novel arrangement with a pressure cylinder inside the feed beam provides for the possibility to use a closed box beam instead of a conventional open channel beam.
The closed feed beam of the box beam type is advantageous as it has a higher structural strength than the open channel beam of a corresponding thickness. It can therefore be made both lighter and stronger than a conventional feed beam.
It is suggested on the Internet home page of Doofor rock drills (http://www.doofor.com/products/feedbeam.htm) available on Jun. 29, 2005, that closed, so called box beams may be used as aluminium feed beams. The feed beam presented on the Doofor home page is only a schematic illustration showing only a few constructional details.
The main object of the present invention is to achieve a light metal feed beam, which is in the form of a box beam and which is well suited for use as feed beam. This is solved by the features set forth in the characterising portion of the independent claim.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are set forth in the dependent claims.
According to a main aspect, the present invention relates to an elongated feed beam for a rock drill, comprising a profiled beam of a light metal or a light metal alloy made from a hollow extruded profile with a substantially rectangular cross section with an upper wall, a lower wall and two side walls. The feed beam includes at least one pair of external guide beads. The individual guide beads are placed on either side of either the upper wall or the lower wall where said upper or lower wall meets the opposed side walls. Further, the guide beads have a substantially prismatic cross section.
The feed beam according to the invention is both lighter and stronger than conventional feed beams. Additionally, it has a shape that is well adapted to withstand operational efforts without the use of excessive material.
These and other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
In the detailed description of the present invention reference is made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
As briefly discussed above,
Now with reference to
In this specific embodiment a feed line 10, which is affected by the pressure cylinder 7 inside the feed beam, drives the drilling machine 5 such that it moves in accordance with the arrows A, B when the pressure cylinder is retracted A or extended B. The feed line 1 is arranged such that a given distance that the free end 7A of the pressure cylinder 7 is moved implies that the drilling machine 5 is moved twice that distance. This is described more in detail in the international application PCT/SE2006/000244, and will not be described further herein.
Now, with reference to
The whole structure of the feed beam is designed for operational conditions. The fact that the beam 4 has four walls instead of three walls as in the conventional open, channel beam described in EP 0 159 974 B1 of course makes it much stronger. Due to the upper wall 11, the side walls 13, 14 are put under a lot less stress than the side walls of a conventional channel beam and may correspondingly be made thinner. Beyond this, the inside corners of the beam are shaped in a form that is intended to meet two important requirements. Firstly they need to be sufficiently rigid to withstand the forces that the beam is exposed to from the drilling machine and secondly they should not be made to solid, i.e. any excessive use of material should be avoided. With the corners according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rigidity of the beam is high enough, even though less material is used than for many conventional open channel beams.
The guide beads 8, 9 are placed on either side of either the upper wall 11 or the lower wall 12 where the upper or lower wall 11, 12 meets the opposed side walls 13, 14. Preferably, the guide beads 8, 9 have a substantially prismatic cross section and has two substantially planar support surfaces 21, 22 that are joined by an edge 23 and inclined with respect to each other with an angle θ of 45° to 100°, such that the edge 23 constitutes the outermost parts of the beads 8, 9. Preferably, the angle θ between the surfaces 21, 22 is about 90°, e.g. between 80° and 100°. Such a shape has proven very utile as it is well adapted to receiving the forces that the beads 8, 9 are put under from the drilling machine 5. It is also feasible to construct the guide beads such that their upper surfaces 21 are horizontal. This is particularly useful for small angles of θ.
Generally, during operation the drill string 6 is exposed to forces that tend to rotate the drilling machine 5 with respect to the feed beam 4. Using prismatic guide beads 8, 9 with an angle θ between the support surfaces 21, 22 of about 90°, the forces from the drilling machine will be essentially orthogonal to one of the support surfaces on both of the prismatic guide beads 8, 9, as illustrated by F1 and F2 in
In the elaboration of the shape the corners, a number of different types were initially suggested. Tensions were calculated for anticipated operational stress situations, e.g. F1 and F2 in
As is evident in
Opposite the recesses 18 mentioned above, on the other side of the respective side wall 13, 14, internal longitudinal bulges 19 extend. These bulges 19 are located such they at least partly overlap the external longitudinal 18 recesses. The bulges 19 make up for the lost of material on the outside of the side walls 13, 14 implied by the recesses 18 and preferably the width of the side wall 13, 14 is substantially invariable over this passage such that no specifically weak point is formed in the cross section of the feed beam 4.
Additionally, as a way of saving material essentially without affecting the rigidity of the feed beam 4, internal longitudinal recesses 20 extend inside the feed beam on both side walls, which recesses are located such that they at least partly overlap the guide beads 8, 9. The reduced wall width due to loss of material implied by these recesses 20 are in other words compensated for by the additional width of the side wall provided by the guide beads 8, 9. It is important that the surface of the feed beam is substantially smooth and flat as any defects or edged shapes may act as starting points for cracks and weaken the general structure. Therefore, all corners or details are well rounded and, in addition, polished.
Also, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, the guide beads 8, 9 are solid. It would of course be possible to produce hollow guide beads, as has been the case in prior art. However, as the guide beads according to present invention are integrated in the overall structure the small amount of additional material that is needed to make the beads solid provides a much stronger general structure as well as much stronger guide beads and is therefore more than justified.
Preferably, internal longitudinal grooves or tracks 17 extend essentially along the centre of the side walls 13, 14. The tracks 17 are adapted for guiding the movement of a drive mechanism 24 involved in driving the drilling machine 5. As may be seen in
The feed beam is preferably produced from an extruded aluminium beam. The basic material for extruded aluminium profiles is alloyed aluminium billets. The billets are cut into work pieces of suitable lengths and are warmed up to a temperature of about 450-500° C. before they are forced through a die with the appropriate profile. The finished profile runs out of the die almost like a tooth paste out of a tube. The profiles are generally extruded at a speed of 5-50 metres per minute and can be as long as 50 metres. Naturally a beam produced in this way has an invariable cross section along its whole length.
Thereafter the profiles are sawn into required lengths, a feed beam is typically between 4 and 12 metres long. The full strength of the material is usually achieved through a few hours' heat treatment, or thermal ageing, in a furnace. Cold ageing is also possible, and makes the material harder. Generally it is however appreciable that the feed beam is not made too hard as a moderate resiliency in the beam increases the ductility and the absorption of vibrations.
The production of hollow aluminium profiles is more complicated than the production of other profiles. In order to produce a hollow extruded article the die needs to include at least two parts, one core part and one outer part. The core part is needed for creation of the hole and the outer part forms the outer profile.
The possibility to produce a useful profile is one of the most important differences from conventional steel beams. On these beams guide beads for the drilling machine had to be welded on to the beam. This caused a number of problems. First of all it is very difficult to produce a straight weld of such length, which is a requirement if the drilling machine is to slide smoothly along the feed beam. A second problem is that the weld in itself may not be as resistant to exterior forces as the rest of the structure. It is also difficult to adapt the form of the guide beads to specific needs when they need to be welded on to the feed beam.
On extruded aluminium feed beams the beads may be made integral with the beam, which both strengthens the overall construction and offers a greater liberty in the constructional shaping of e.g. the guide beads. As mentioned above an extruded aluminium feed beam is thicker than a conventional feed beam of steel. The thickness of the beam may however be an advantage as it makes it possible for auxiliary equipment to be screwed on to the beam, instead of as for conventional beams where all auxiliary equipment needed to be welded on to the beam. The reason for this is that the aluminium feed beam has a thickness that allows for a sufficient number of threads to hold a bolt, which the steel feed beam did not.
The use of extruded aluminium profiles as feed beams presents a large number of advantages compared to conventional feed beams that are made of steel.
Another advantage of an aluminium feed beam is of course its resistance to corrosion, which is due to passivating of the surface layer of the aluminium when exposed to air, whereby Al2O3 is formed. The passivated aluminium layer protects the aluminium from further oxidation. However, part of the Al2O3-layer may come loose if subjected to heavy wear, whereby the aluminium beneath will be exposed to air. Whenever this happens a new protective Al2O3-layer will form and protect the aluminium from further oxidation. However, in order to avoid that guide beads are worn down due to the sliding cradle upon them they are preferably provided with protective bent steel plates that are snapped on to the beads. A problem with these bent plates is however that they are difficult to replace when they get worn down as the drilling machine needs to be removed before the plates may be replaced. In a preferred embodiment of this invention the plates on the guide beads 8, 9 consist of at least two shorter plates such that the it suffices to place the drilling machine at one end of the feed beam 4 to be able to replace the plate at the other end. When the first plate has been replaced the drilling machine may be moved onto the new plate at the other end of the beam so that the plate at the first end may be replaced. It has been discovered that no specific joint is needed between two plates. As long as adjacent plates are kept closely together the drilling machine may slide smoothly over the splice between them. Hence, the bent plates are preferably kept butt to butt.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0501518 | Jun 2005 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2006/050153 | 5/23/2006 | WO | 00 | 11/26/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/004969 | 1/11/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4682899 | Andersson et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4941197 | Roeser | Jul 1990 | A |
5549390 | Reitberger | Aug 1996 | A |
5704716 | Jantunen | Jan 1998 | A |
6190047 | Haag et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6293269 | Selb et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6472778 | Keller | Oct 2002 | B2 |
20040255709 | Reitberger | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 159 974 | Oct 1985 | EP |
9518912 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO2004074626 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2006098674 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Printout from website www.doofor.com, Printed Nov. 15, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090080815 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |