This disclosure relates to fluorescence microscopy and, in particular, to scanning systems that can be used in microscopy instruments to illuminate and scan a focal plane of a specimen.
Laser scanning confocal microscopy has become a significant advance in optical microscopy, primarily because the technique enables visualization deep within living and fixed cells and tissues and affords the ability to collect sharply defined optical sections from which three-dimensional renderings of a specimen can be created. Confocal microscopy offers several advantages over conventional widefield optical microscopy, including control over depth of field, elimination or reduction of background information away from the focal plane, and the ability to collect serial optical sections from thick specimens. Confocal imaging typically relies on sequential collection of light from spatially filtered individual specimen points, followed by electronic-signal processing and ultimately, the visual display as corresponding image points. Typical confocal microscopes use a focused beam or line of excitation light to illuminate a point or line within the specimen. Scanning the focused excitation beam across the specimen focal plane can be accomplished by mechanically translating the microscope stage with respect to the fixed position of the focused excitation beam. However, mechanically translating the stage is a time consuming process. Alternatively, the excitation beam can be scanned across the focal plane by reflecting the beam off of a rotatable minor. However, rotating the minor creates a pivot axis that often results in a portion of the excitation beam being clipped by a plate located at the back of the objective, thereby reducing the irradiance of the excitation beam that reaches the focal plane.
Engineers and microscope designers have attempted to correct these problems by designing various lens-based systems to control the path of the excitation beam. However, lenses introduce unacceptable aberrations into the system for large scan angles as well as a substantially increased path length, and lenses also require additional alignment degrees of freedom which can add to system complexity. For the above described reasons, engineers, scientists, and microscope manufacturers continue to seek faster systems and methods for scanning confocal illumination of a focal plane.
Various light-scanning systems that can be used to perform rapid line-by-line illumination of a focal plane within a specimen are disclosed. The light-scanning systems can be incorporated in confocal microscopy instruments to create an excitation beam pivot axis that lies within an aperture at the back plate of an objective lens. The light-scanning systems receive a beam of excitation light from a light source and direct the excitation beam to pass through the pivot point in the aperture of the back plate of the objective lens while continuously scanning the focused excitation beam across a focal plane. The light-scanning systems are implemented with flat minors, which limits aberrations and attenuation of the excitation beam. The minors can be mounted in a compact arrangement to limit path length. Because the light-scanning systems are not implemented with lenses, only four degrees of freedom are used to align the excitation beam.
The control unit 118 controls the position of mirror 308 so that the excitation beam 120, after six reflections off of the minors 304, 306 and 308, is ultimately output along one of many different paths that intersect at a point 124 called a “pivot point.” For example, patterned lines 126-128 represent just three of a continuum of separate paths along which the light-scanning system 104 outputs the line-shaped excitation beam. The paths 126-128 intersect at the pivot point 124. The light source 102 and light-scanning system 104 are positioned within the instrument 100 so that the dichroic mirror 106 intersects the excitation beam paths so that the pivot point 124 is located at or near an aperture 130 of the back plate 110. For example, as shown in
For each focal line in the focal plane 132, a portion of the fluorescent light emitted from fluorophores in the specimen 122 surrounding the focal line is captured and collimated by the objective lens 108. For example,
For each rotational position of the pivot minor 308 that results in the beam 400 being placed on a path through the pivot point 412, the beam 400 is reflected off of pivot mirror 308 three times, the first stationary mirror 304 one time, and the second stationary mirror 306 two times for a total of six reflections.
The distance of the pivot point from the mirror 308 can be determined by how far the minors 304, 306 and 308 are spaced from each other. The farther the minors 304, 306 and 308 are spaced from one another, the farther pivot point is from the minor 308. On the other hand, in order to position the pivot point closer to the minor 308, distance between the mirrors 304, 306 and 308 is decreased.
The principle behind the ability to generate a downstream pivot point depends on the multiple reflections off of the pivot minor. In a typical optical arrangement involving a pivot minor, the beam reflects off of the pivot mirror only one time. In this arrangement, as the pivot mirror is scanned through a mechanical angle Δθ, the output beam is scanned through an angle 2·Δθ, with the pivot axis of the output beam located approximately at the reflective face of the pivot minor. If additional fixed minors are added to this arrangement so that the beam is redirected for a second reflection off of the pivot mirror, an additional scan angle of 2·Δθ is either added or subtracted to the original scan angle. If there are an odd number of fixed minor reflections between the first and second pivot minor reflections, the 2·Δθ scan angle from the second pivot mirror reflection is added for a total scan angle of 4·Δθ. If there are an even number of fixed mirror reflections between the first and second pivot minor reflections, the 2·Δθ scan angle from the second pivot minor reflection is subtracted for a total scan angle of 0. In this second case, even though the total scan angle is zero, there is a non-zero lateral beam translation that is proportional to the total optical path length between the first and second pivot minor reflections. When this lateral beam translation is applied to a third pivot mirror reflection, which is accomplished by once again redirecting the beam onto the pivot mirror via a reflection of one or more fixed mirrors, the net effect is a final scan angle equal to the original 2·Δθ, but with a translated beam pivot axis. If there are an even number of fixed minor reflections in between the second and third pivot minor reflections, the pivot axis is translated upstream to a virtual pivot point, but if there are an odd number of fixed minor reflections in between the second and third pivot mirror reflections, the pivot axis is translated downstream to a real pivot point. Based upon these principles and with an additional pivot mirror and fixed mirror reflections, there are many ways to generate the same beam scanning with translated pivot axis. The systems described herein represent only one example of many ways in which multiple pivot mirror reflections can be utilized to generate a desired translation in the pivot axis of the scanned beam.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the systems and methods described herein. The foregoing descriptions of specific examples are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive of or to limit this disclosure to the precise forms described. Obviously, many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The examples are shown and described in order to best explain the principles of this disclosure and practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize this disclosure and various examples with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of this disclosure be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a filing under 35 U.S.C. 371 of international application number PCT/SE2011/051602, filed Dec. 29, 2011, published on Jul. 26, 2012 as WO 2012/099521, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 61/434,557; filed Jan. 20, 2011.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2011/051602 | 12/29/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/10/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/099521 | 7/26/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4054360 | Oosaka et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4682842 | Brueggemann | Jul 1987 | A |
4960312 | Razzaghi | Oct 1990 | A |
6128077 | Jovin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6211988 | Engelhardt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6407856 | Kask et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
7834158 | Hober | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7978389 | Ishibashi | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8649089 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20020018310 | Hung | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024007 | Engelhardt et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020163704 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030035208 | Engelhardt | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040125428 | Kobayashi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050146784 | Vogt | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060072191 | Akiyama et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070146869 | Lauer | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153373 | Uhl | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070268574 | Sasaki | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100214404 | Chen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100284051 | Ishibashi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110188105 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10209322 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10 2006 028530 | May 2007 | DE |
2 053 505 | Feb 1981 | GB |
49-118436 | Nov 1974 | JP |
2002-258203 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO 03046613 | Jun 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Search Report Dated May 27, 2014 Issued on Corresponding EP Application No. 11856471.5. |
Christ, T., et al., Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 372, No. 5-6 (2003) 878-885. |
Rembe, C., et al., Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 77, No. 8 (2006) 083702-1-083702-11. |
Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2013-550444 mailed Jan. 26, 2016 (5 pages). |
Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2013-550444 mailed Jun. 21, 2016 (2 pages). |
Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2016-087290 mailed Mar. 14, 2017 (3 pages, including English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130286456 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61434557 | Jan 2011 | US |