In some applications, drop detection devices are utilized to detect liquid drops ejected by ejector nozzles. Based on the detection of liquid drops, the status of a particular nozzle or groups of nozzles can be diagnosed. In some cases light scattering from the ejected drops is used in the drop detection devices.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In this regard, directional terminology, such as “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “leading,” “trailing,” etc., is used with reference to the orientation of the Figure(s) being described. Because components of embodiments of the present invention can be positioned in a number of different orientations, the directional terminology is used for purposes of illustration and is in no way limiting. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
For example, in one application ink drops are deposited on print media in a print engine for an inkjet printer. In such an application, drop detector arrangement 10 may be used to monitor the ejection of ink. In other applications, drop detector arrangement 10 may be used to monitor the ejection of liquid in biochemical tests, diagnostic strips or device coating applications.
In one embodiment, controller 22 is configured to control the plurality of drop ejectors 12 such that liquid droplets 14 are controllably ejected to service station 20. In one embodiment, print media is received adjacent service station 20 such that liquid droplets 14 are controllably deposited on the print media.
In one embodiment, light source 16 is configured to project light beam 18 between the plurality of drop ejectors 12 and service station 20. As such, when liquid droplets 14 are ejected drop ejectors 12, liquid droplets 14 pass through light beam 18 as they drop to service station 20. In various embodiments, light source 16 may be a collimated source, such as a laser source, or an LED.
As a liquid droplet 14 passes through light beam 18, light from light beam 18 is scattered in various directions. Light collector 24 is illustrated adjacent light beam 18 and some of the scattered light will enter light collector 24. Light collector 24 is illustrated in dotted lines in
In one embodiment, light collected into light collector 24 from the light scattering that occurred when liquid droplet 14 passed through light beam 18 can be used to measure the effectiveness or status of liquid droplet 14 from one or more of ejectors 12. For example, if controller 22 directs one particular drop ejector to eject a liquid droplet 14 at a particular point in time, corresponding light scattering from liquid droplet 14 passing through light beam 18 should enter light collector 24. By monitoring the collected light and correlating it with control signals from controller 22, a determination can be made as to whether a liquid droplet 14 did in fact eject, as well as determinations about the size, velocity and quality of liquid droplet 14.
In one embodiment, light collector 24 includes a light detector. In one embodiment, a first end of light collector 24 is located adjacent light source 16 and the light detector is located at a second end of light collector 24, which is opposite the first end. In one example, the light detector is coupled to controller 22, which is configured to process light signals that are collected in light collector 24 and then coupled into the light detector. In one example, a separate controller from controller 22 may be used to process the collected light signals.
In one embodiment, light source 16 is a collimated light source such as a laser source or similar device. In various embodiments, the shape of light beam 18 is circular, elliptical, rectangular (as illustrated in
As illustrated in the embodiment, as a liquid droplet 14 passes through light beam 18, scattered light 17 and 19 is deflected in various orientations. Light will scatter in many directions, but for ease of illustration just a few examples are shown. Some scattered light 17 is directed away from light collector 24, while some scattered light 19 is directed into light collector 24. In one embodiment, light collector 24 is configured to collect scattered light 19 and to direct it to the light detector and controller 28 for further processing.
In one embodiment, light collector 24 is a tubular-shaped light pipe that is configured to be adjacent each of a series of drop ejector nozzles 12. As such, as each nozzle 12 ejects a liquid droplet 14 through light beam 18, scattered light 19 is collected all along the length of light collector 24. In this way, only a single collector 24 is needed to collect scattered light 19 from a plurality of drop ejectors 12 located along its length. Collector 24 then propagates all of this collected scattered light 19 from the various liquid droplets 14 to the light detector and controller 28 for further processing.
In one embodiment, light collector 24 is configured with grating or a pitch that is angled to deflect most of scattered light 19 toward a light detector coupled to controller 28. In one embodiment, the light detector includes a photodetector, or similar sensor of light or other electromagnetic energy capable of detecting scattered light 19 from droplet 14 passing through light beam 18. In one embodiment, the light detector includes a charge-coupled device (CCD) or CMOS array having a plurality of cells that provide sensing functions. The CCD or CMOS array by means of the plurality of cells detects the light in its various intensities. In one embodiment, the light detector receives scattered light 19 and generates an electrical signal that is representative of the scattered light 19 for processing by controller 28.
In an embodiment, light collector 25 may be a photodetector or may be a photodetector array such as CCD, CMOS or even Avalanche Photo Detectors (APD). Typically the CCD array may have a plurality of cells that provide the sensing functions. The CCD array, by means of the plurality of cells, detects the light in its various intensities. Each liquid droplet 14 is identified from the detected light intensity of a group of one or more cells of the CCD array.
Similar to light collector 24 in
As evident from
In one embodiment, controller 22 controls the plurality of drop ejectors 12 such that each is configured to dispense a liquid droplet 14 at a specified time.
As such, each corresponding liquid droplet 14 passes though light beam 18 at a known time, and the corresponding collected scattered light 19 produces a peak in the output signal that can be correlated by controller 28 in order to verify a liquid droplet 14 was indeed produced, and also to determine the volume of each liquid droplet 14 produced.
The light detector signal 45 is related to drop volume. A relationship of the scattered light signal to other elements in drop detector arrangement 10 may be defined as follows:
ILS˜I·V·k/v0,
or
ILS˜V·Δt,
where:
Based on these relationships, a drop volume relationship may be derived by either of the two following:
V˜ILSmax/v0, {relationship 1}
where:
These relationships are useful for evaluation of drop size for a geometry of drop detector arrangement 10.
In
Drop velocity v0 may be derived from the waveforms illustrated in
Because controller 22 is configured to control the ejection of each droplet 14 from ejectors 12 and light collector 24 is configured to collect light as the droplet 14 reaches light beam 18, the delay time td is calculable within controller 22. The nozzle-to-beam distance x0 is known in any given drop detector arrangement 10 such that velocity v0 is calculated using nozzle-to-beam distance x0 and delay time (td).
Volume (V) of the droplet 14 may then be determined using this velocity v0 calculation along with relationship 1 or 2 given above. In relationship 1, the maximum (peak) of intensity of light scattering ILSmax is measured from the scattered light 19 collected at light collector 24, then it is divided by the calculated velocity v0 of the droplet 14. In relationship 2, the intensity of light scattering ILS is integrated over the time period of the pulse width (PW), then it is divided by the calculated velocity v0 of the droplet 14. In either case, a representation of the droplet volume (V) is made.
In one embodiment, the same geometry is used within drop detector arrangement 10 for generating each of output signals 61, 63, 65 and 67. For example, the same firing energy is used, the same detector, same lens, same distance, same angles, same light source optical power, same power density, same wavelength and so forth. As such, once the area under each output signal is calculated, variations in the calculated area is proportional to the droplet volume as indicate in relationships 1 and 2 above. Once drop velocity is calculated, each area calculation may be divided by the velocity such that drop volume is indicated.
Although the calculated signal area/time delay in the upper bar graph of
In either case, whether by conversion or calibration, the output signal representative of scattered light 19 collected in a drop detector arrangement 10, such as that illustrated in
For example, in precision dispensing in the range of picoliters or microliters, it may be useful to know the volume of each individual droplet, including any variations from droplet to droplet. In some biochemical testing, diagnostic strips, device coatings and other printed materials, such individual droplet volume determinations may be useful.
A drop detection arrangement as disclosed herein allows a calculation of the velocity of an ejected drop, and a determination of the volume of the ejected drop using the output signal and the velocity of the ejected drop.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, the drop detector arrangement 10 could be used in conjunction with a computer printer, or with any of a variety of drop ejection systems while remaining within the spirit and scope of the present invention. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the specific embodiments discussed herein. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4422719 | Orcutt | Dec 1983 | A |
| 5304814 | Markham | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5428218 | Toughlian et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5589858 | Kadowaki et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5621524 | Mitani | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5742303 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5774141 | Cooper et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5856833 | Elgee et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5896145 | Osborne et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6088134 | Schmidt | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6168258 | Lou et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6299275 | Elgee | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6513900 | Endo et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6517184 | Bruch et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6525863 | Riza | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6565179 | Bruch et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6585349 | Lou et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6648444 | Valero et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6747684 | Ornellas et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6767122 | Honguh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6769756 | Su et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6786626 | Wu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6802580 | Valero | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6814422 | Bruch et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6851816 | Wu et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6877838 | Elgee | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6935717 | Su et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6966664 | Wu | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6969159 | Su et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6984013 | Arqullevich et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7055925 | Subirada et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7125151 | Uemura et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7140762 | Wu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7249830 | Hawkins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7267467 | Wu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7287824 | Subirada et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7287833 | Howard | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7364276 | Piatt et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7434919 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7442180 | Vitello et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7452053 | Valles et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7490918 | Nagashima | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7513616 | Lin | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7832822 | Kiyama et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 20010019480 | Fujino et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20030193608 | Yen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030218648 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040254527 | Vitello et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021244 | Nicoli et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024410 | Subirada et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253890 | Nagashima | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060103691 | Dietl et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060120098 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060139392 | Fernandez et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187651 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060279601 | Unosawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070024658 | Diol et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030300 | Jeong | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064068 | Piatt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20080180471 | Han | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080246803 | Barger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090027459 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090091595 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090141057 | Hayashi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090179934 | Takagi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244141 | Govyadinov et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090244163 | Govyadinov | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273620 | Govyadinov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090310206 | Gluckstad | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100207989 | Govyadinov | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20120013906 | Govyadinov et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2001113725 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2005083769 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2006047235 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2006346906 | Dec 2006 | JP |
| 2007111971 | May 2007 | JP |
| 2007015808 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| 2009120436 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Svanholm, Erik, “Printability and Ink-Coating Interactions in Inkjet Printing,” Dissertation, Karlstad University Studies 2007:2, pp. 58 (Feb. 2007). |
| The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2009/034892 mailed Jul. 28, 2009 (5 pages). |
| The International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/034892 mailed Jul. 28, 2009 (3 pages). |
| The Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 12/381,873 mailed on Sep. 29, 2010 (6 pages). |
| The Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 12/079,338 mailed on Mar. 17, 2011 (7 pages). |
| The Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,805 mailed on Jul. 14, 2011 (6 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/254,864 mailed on Jun. 11, 2010 (23 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/381,873 mailed on Feb. 4, 2011 (12 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/079,338 mailed on Jul. 25, 2011 (15 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,805 mailed on Aug. 25, 2011 (19 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/381,873 mailed on Sep. 1, 2011 (11 pages). |
| The Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/254,864 mailed on Dec. 1, 2010 (12 pages). |
| McLeod, Euan et al., “Complex Beam Sculpting with Tunable Acoustic Gradient Index Lenses,” SPIE, Complex Light and Optical Forces, vol. 6483, pp. 1-9, (2007). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/079,338 mailed May 25, 2012 (6 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/079,338 mailed Dec. 12, 2012 (7 pages). |
| The Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/079,338 mailed Feb. 8, 2012 (7 pages). |
| The Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/079,338 mailed Apr. 18, 2012 (3 pages). |
| The Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,805 mailed Jan. 13, 2012 (14 pages). |
| The Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,805 mailed Mar. 19, 2012 (3 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,805 mailed Oct. 17, 2012 (10 pages). |
| The Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/381,873 mailed Feb. 8, 2012 (15 pages). |
| The Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/837,098 mailed Sep. 10, 2012 (8 pages). |
| The Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/837,098 mailed Apr. 26, 2012 (20 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110090275 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |