This invention relates to a light signaling device related to the operating state of a system and a process for management of such a device, particularly for avionics.
In order to simplify the description, the following presentation is restricted to an implementation of the invention for avionics, as an example.
At the present time, many light type signaling indicators such as light emitting diodes are used in aircraft cockpits to keep pilots and possibly maintenance operators informed about the operating states of different systems present in these aircraft.
Loss of information output by this type of indicator, mainly during operation, can be difficult or even dangerous.
Therefore, pilots regularly need to make regular checks that these indicators are in good working condition by using a test command which effectively lights up a predetermined set of indicators, for example indicators in the ceiling panel. The pilots then need to replace the defective lights on line.
Thus, as illustrated on
This type of set has many disadvantages, and particularly:
Replacing incandescent bulbs by light emitting diodes has made it possible to extend the life of this type of indicator.
It is also known how to use lights each composed of several light emitting elements 20 in a serial/parallel circuit, as shown on
The purpose of the invention is a light signaling device related to the operating state of a system capable of overcoming the disadvantages of devices according to prior art by detecting failures of signaling indicators and guaranteeing correct operation, even in the presence of some failures. The invention is also related to a process for management of such a device.
This invention relates to a light signaling device related to the operating state of a system comprising at least one light and means of detection of a failure of this or these lights, characterized in that each light comprises m branches in parallel each composed of n light emitting diodes in series, and means of selecting a branch, where m and n are integer numbers such that m≧2 and n≧1.
Advantageously, each light comprises
This device advantageously comprises the following circuits associated with each light:
Advantageously, each light and its control module and its switch are included in a single box.
This invention also relates to a process for management of a light signaling device related to the operating state of a system, comprising several lights each comprising several branches of several light elements, in which there is a step consisting of a permanent automatic test of all lights in the system.
Advantageously, the process comprises a step for dynamic management of redundancy if there is a failure in a branch of a light.
During the test step, the following steps are carried out for each light:
During the dynamic management step, the different branches of each light are illuminated alternately at a scanning frequency of the order of a few kilohertz, the current/voltage parameters being checked in each scanning. A branch is no longer energized if a fault is observed in the branch. However, if all branches are in fault but there is at least one branch that is not in open circuit, this (these) branch(es) may be requalified as being functional.
If a fault is observed in at least one branch, the cyclic ratio for lighting other branches without a fault is modified so that the overall brightness of the light remains unchanged.
The invention may advantageously be used in avionics.
Thus, in the process according to the invention, a permanent automatic test of all lights in the cockpit of an aircraft are tested and the pilot thus no longer need to carry out this task. This type of continuous test avoids the pilot failing to detect a hidden failure. Furthermore, the redundant structure of the lights enables immediate dynamic management if there is a failure of this first redundancy without any visible repercussion by the pilot, and therefore without any additional work for him.
The light signaling device according to the invention comprises at least one light 29 like that shown on
A voltage measurement device 34 connected between the input E and the output S of the light determines the voltage at the terminals of this light. A current measurement device 35 connected to the output of the light 29 provides information about the intensity of the current that passes through it.
As shown on
The process according to the invention carries out a dynamic test of all lights 29, for example the lights in an aircraft cockpit, such as:
The process according to the invention also dynamically manages redundancy of each light which consist of using selector 33, and alternately selecting the different branches 31 of this light at a sufficiently high scanning frequency (of the order of a few kHz) so that it cannot be perceived by the human eye.
The current/voltage parameters of the light will be checked during each scan. If a fault is observed, the branch concerned is no longer energized and the cyclic lighting ratio for the other branches is modified so that the overall brightness of the light remains unchanged.
Thus, the process according to the invention avoids total loss of the light. Also, even when the light is not on, the process according to the invention continues its dynamic test by carrying out a short control of the different branches. As soon as a first branch is lost, a preventive maintenance message can be produced without the pilot being informed about it.
Thus, operation is as follows considering the two possible states of a light (light off or light on):
No order reaches the external control line 45. The control module 41 opens and closes the switch 42 to supply power for the light 29 by sufficiently short pulses, for example of the order of a few microseconds and at intervals such that the light 29 appears off to an observer.
Each pulse is switched in sequence by selector 33 to one of the branches 31. It is used to measure the voltage at the terminals of this branch and the current that passes through it.
Two failure cases can be detected (there are only two failure modes for a light emitting diode, namely short circuit and open circuit):
This type of “light Off” operating mode enables the control module 41 to determine which functional branches may be used in “light on” mode, before giving any order to switch the light on.
A light on order arrived on the external control line 45. The control module 41 closes the switch 42 to energize the light 29 continuously. The selector 33 controlled by the signal C cyclically energizes the functional branches 31 one after the other.
For each energized branch 31, two failure cases may be detected:
It is possible to have a degraded operating mode in which all branches are declared to be non-functional but in which there is at least one branch which is not in open circuit. In this case, the branch(es) in question may be requalified as being functional, and the light emits less light than during its nominal operation.
Any failure detection can be followed by sending a signal on the report line, that will be sent to an operator and/or any maintenance system.
In one advantageous embodiment like that illustrated on
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
01 14445 | Nov 2001 | FR | national |
The present application is related to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/289,054, filed Nov. 5th, 2002, in the name of inventor Christophe Fleury, entitled “Process for Management of a Light Signaling Device, and a Device Using this Process, Particularly for Avionics”, commonly assigned herewith. The present application claims priority from French Application No 01 14445, filed Nov. 8, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3719937 | Doyle | Mar 1973 | A |
3781853 | Jacobs | Dec 1973 | A |
3812351 | Coberley | May 1974 | A |
4217573 | Norris | Aug 1980 | A |
4271408 | Teshima et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4298869 | Okuno | Nov 1981 | A |
5161879 | McDermott | Nov 1992 | A |
5491383 | Leiber et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5680098 | Bejster et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5717335 | Lee | Feb 1998 | A |
5744961 | Otaka | Apr 1998 | A |
5786682 | Aiken et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801623 | Chen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5896010 | Mikolajczak et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6239716 | Pross et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6351079 | Willis | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6490512 | Niggemann | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6577247 | Giacaman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6608453 | Morgan et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 194 295 | Jun 1965 | DE |
31 12038 | Feb 1982 | DE |
42 08306 | Sep 1993 | DE |
0 209 269 | Jan 1987 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030085672 A1 | May 2003 | US |