Patent Grant
11352775
The present invention is in the field of modular building construction methods and systems used within the construction industry.
Building construction systems including modular features are sometimes used in the construction field. For example, particularly in third world countries where skilled labor is not readily available, and building materials must be relatively inexpensive, cinder block or brick materials are used in constructing homes, schools, agricultural buildings, and other buildings. It can be difficult to learn to lay block or brick while keeping the walls square and plumb. In addition, such systems require mortar to hold the individual blocks or bricks together. A roof formed from a different material (other than block or brick) is needed. In addition, insulating and/or providing an air-tight seal within such structures is difficult.
Stick frame construction methods are of course also well known, although such systems also require a considerable amount of skilled labor to construct a building therefrom. In addition to requiring skilled labor, such existing methods also require considerable strength for those involved in the construction. Because of such requirements, in practice, such construction systems are not readily usable by groups of both men and women, where women often make up the vast majority of the labor pool available in third world humanitarian construction projects.
Various other building materials and systems are also used in the art. Structural insulated panels (SIPs) are used in some circumstances within the construction industry as an alternative to stick frame construction with insulation blown or laid within the cavities between stick framing members. A typical structural insulated panel may include an insulating layer sandwiched between two layers of structural plywood or oriented strand board (“OSB”). The use of such panels within residential, commercial or other construction projects can often significantly decrease the time required for construction, and also typically provides superior insulating ability as compared to a traditional structure constructed of block or brick, or even stick frame construction with insulation blown or laid between frame members. That said, drawbacks with such systems is that stick frame construction and SIP construction typically require some level of skilled labor, and thus are not particularly well suited for use in environments where such skills are not readily available, and shipping such panels can represent a significant expense. In addition, heavy equipment (e.g., cranes) are often required to install such panels.
In one aspect, the present invention is directed to various building construction systems and methods. Such systems and methods may employ a plurality of modular panels, which may be based on a common modularity within each panel. The system could also be a fractal system, e.g., where larger panels could be provided, based on multiples of such a base panel. In any case, the modularity and particular panel design of the system also allows the modular panels to be easily and quickly cut, where the building blueprints dictate the need for only a portion of the overall modular panel length. Such modularity characteristics will be apparent, in the following disclosure.
Furthermore, many existing systems provide excellent flexibility, but with that flexibility, there is significant room for error, such that skilled labor is required. Other systems that may employ a system of panels may reduce the room for error, but greatly reduce the available flexibility, necessitating use of many custom components and solutions to accommodate needs that the system does not anticipate. The present system provides a happy medium between providing flexibility, and requiring only little if any skilled labor.
A modular panel for use in construction may include a lightweight (e.g., foam) body, and one or more channels extending horizontally through a length of the panel. Each channel may be configured in size and shape to receive a flexible elongate spline therein, wherein each spline once received in the channel is at least partially disposed within the lightweight body, without the spline being exposed on the large outside planar face of the body.
One advantage of the present system is that the splines may simply be ripped strips of oriented strand board (OSB) or the like, which is readily available throughout nearly the entire world, and which is also more flexible in a direction that is normal to the width of the OSB spline (i.e., in the direction of its thickness), than would be typical for dimensional lumber, even of the same dimensions. For example, while Applicant has also developed earlier systems which use dimensional lumber as splines, it was found that because such lumber is notorious for being warped, it can be difficult to easily insert each spline into its corresponding channel, when a significant fraction of 2×4s or other dimensional lumber is warped. Flexible strips of OSB or similar material are far more easily inserted into the channels, as described herein. It is not necessary that the splines be formed of wood, although such works particularly well. It will be apparent that metal or other splines (e.g., steel or aluminum, plastic, etc.) are of course also usable, e.g., where it may be desirable to avoid the use of wood.
The channels may include pairs of top and bottom channels, offset from the center of the thickness of the foam body, for use in providing horizontally extending I-beams at the top and bottom of each channel. For example, stacked panels may include an I-beam that is formed in-situ, during construction of the wall, between such stacked panels. For example, as the panel is placed, the elongate splines are positioned in the top and/or bottom channels, another spline is positioned between such splines to form the central web portion of the I-beam (where the splines in the channels form the end flanges of the I-beam), and the next panel is stacked on top of the first panel. The bottom channels of the second panel receive initially exposed portions of the splines forming the end flanges of the I-beam inserted in the first panel, hiding these splines (and the I-beam) between and within the pair of stacked panels.
The panels may also include interior channels, as well as a pre-cut slot in a first face of the modular panel, centered on the interior channel, where the pre-cut slot extends through the thickness of the foam at the first face of the panel, into the interior channel. In other words, such a narrow pre-cut slot may provide access into the channel from one exterior face of the panel. The width of such a pre-cut slot may be relatively thin, to ensure that a spline that may also be inserted into such interior channel (e.g., providing a furring strip) remains restrained in the channel. For example, such a pre-cut slot may be no more than 0.25 inch, or no more than 0.125 inch wide, e.g., less than 20%, less than 15%, less than 10%, or less than 5% of the transverse cross-sectional length (e.g., a length of 2-6 inches may be typical) of the channel.
The opposite face of the modular panel may similarly include a pre-cut slot also aligned with an interior channel corresponding to the second (opposite) face of the panel, having similar characteristics as described above relative to the pre-cut slot in the first face of the panel. When it becomes necessary to cut a modular panel (e.g., where a wall being built requires only a portion of the length of such a “full” panel), this is easily accomplished, as the panel may be formed from expanded polystyrene (“EPS”) or another similar insulative foam material.
The panels themselves are cut on a CNC controlled hot wire cutting device, which is capable of making very precise cuts, so that the panels themselves are very accurate in their geometry (e.g., to within 0.001 inch). Thus, the panels may be of any desired thickness, e.g., as dictated by the particular desired wall thickness. For example, a foam panel thickness of 5.5 inches may be equal in width to a 2×6 (which is actually 5.5 inches wide, rather than 6 inches wide). By way of further example, a panel corresponding to 2×8 dimensions may be 7.25 inches thick. A typical 7.25 inch thick foam panel may include channels cut with the CNC device that are sized to accept ½ inch or ⅝ inch thick OSB ripped splines, having a width of typically 2-6 inches (e.g., 3-4 inches), although it will be apparent that such dimensions could be varied, as needed.
The various channels may be off-center relative to the thickness of the foam body, and parallel to one another. For example, the various first channels may be positioned closer to the first face of the foam body, and the various second channels may be positioned closer to the second face of the foam body. Any of such channels may be generally rectangular in cross-section, with a length (i.e., the channel's height) of the transverse cross-section rectangle oriented vertically, for desired orientation of the flexible splines therein. As described above, an exemplary panel may include a pair of spaced apart top channels, exposed at the top end of the panel, a pair of spaced apart bottom channels, exposed at the bottom end of the panel, and optionally, a pair of interior channels, between the top and bottom channels. All such channels may receive splines during wall construction, and are configured so that such splines received therein are not exposed at the large planar exterior faces of the panel. The splines in the top (or bottom) channels may initially be exposed, until covered by the next panel, which is stacked over the initially placed panel. For example, the uncovered portion of splines positioned in the top channels becomes received in the bottom channels of the next panel, stacked over the first panel.
For example, first and second top channels extend horizontally through the length of the body, with the first and second top channels being aligned above the first and second interior channels, respectively. There may also be provided first and second bottom channels extending horizontally through a length of the body, where the first bottom channel is aligned with and below the first interior channel (and below the first top channel), and the second bottom channel is aligned with and below the second interior channel (and below the second top channel). The top and bottom channels may be exposed and open at their top and bottom edges respectively, of the body. Each of the top and bottom channels may be generally rectangular in cross section, with the length of the transverse cross-section rectangle oriented vertically, so that each top and bottom channel is configured to also receive a flexible elongate spline therein (e.g., of similar or identical dimension to the splines that may be received in the optional interior channels).
The panel may be configured to provide a horizontal I-beam at the top and bottom of the panel, so that the splines in the top channels become flanges of such a top positioned I-beam, and the splines in the bottom channels become flanges of a bottom positioned I-beam. A web center portion of each I-beam member can be positioned on a top (or bottom) edge of the foam body, so as to be positioned between the splines inserted in the top (or bottom) channels, so as to form I-beams at the top and bottom edges of the foam body. Such a construction results in horizontal I-beams running horizontally through the wall being constructed with such a building system. The panels can be positioned between adjacent vertical post members, such that there is actually no need at all for vertical stud members within the wall construction, although the building system is still fully compatible with existing building codes.
The present disclosure also relates to wall systems, as well as methods of construction that use modular panels such as those described herein. For example, such a wall system may include a plurality of modular panels such as those described herein, in combination with a plurality of flexible splines that serve as interior splines, as well as forming the horizontally extending I-beam members at the top and/or bottom of each panel. The modular panels are typically of a size such that they will not provide the entire height of a typical wall or room being constructed (e.g., they may only be 2 or 4 feet high), but it will typically be required to stack such panels one on top of another to achieve a desired wall height. The top and bottom exposed channels of each panel may be of a depth such that they only receive a portion (e.g., about half) of the width of the spline being received therein, which will form the flange of the I-beam member. The adjacent channels of the next adjacent channel may receive the other portion of the spline. In other words, the top exposed channels may receive the bottom portion (e.g., bottom half) of the splines that form the flanges of the I-beam member positioned at the top of that panel, while another panel is positioned directly over the web of the I-beam member at the top of the first panel, into which the top portion (e.g., top half) of the splines that form the flanges of the I-beam member are also received. This arrangement may be repeated as necessary, depending on the desired wall height.
Another advantage of the present systems is that because the horizontal splines are generally restricted to movement within a single degree of freedom (only along the longitudinal direction of the channel—horizontally, either left to right), once the wall is assembled, it is not necessary that the splines inserted into a given channel be of a single, unitary piece of spline material. For example, scraps of OSB or other spline materials may be advanced or inserted into the channels, to make up the needed spline length. Such ability reduces on-site construction waste, as such small spline lengths may be simply pushed sequentially into the channel, forming the needed spline. There is typically no need to even attach such small spline segments together, although they could be attached to one another (e.g., glued, nailed, screwed, or the like) if desired. For example, they may simply become trapped in the interior channels of the panel, between adjacent posts of the wall. Such post members positioned between panels may be formed of dimensional lumber, or other standard dimensional material, steel, etc.
The present building systems may include a specially configured transition panel for making a transition from a wall (e.g., constructed using the standard panels described herein) to a roof structure. In an embodiment, the roof may similarly be constructed of the same standardized panels as the wall. Such a transition panel is similarly lightweight (e.g., formed from EPS foam). The transition panel may be formed as a single piece of lightweight foam material, forming a transition between the wall structure and the roof structure. The transition panel may similarly include channels for receiving splines as the standard wall panels described herein, for forming an horizontally extending I-beam between the transition panel and the top standard panel of the wall structure below. The transition panel may include another pair of exposed channels for receiving splines, for forming an I-beam between the transition panel and the adjacent roof panel (which may be a standard panel, identical or similar to the standard wall panel).
Such a transition panel may dictate the pitch of the roof structure, by having the desired pitch built into the panel, as the angle between the channels that engage with the adjacent wall panel, and the channels that engage with the adjacent roof panel.
The transition panel may also include any desired overhanging eave structure that overhangs the underlying wall structure. It is advantageous to be able to provide such an eave as part of the single piece transition panel (e.g., rather than assembling an eave from numerous components that are typically nailed/screwed together. In an embodiment, the transition panel may include slots into which stiffeners (e.g., OSB material) could be inserted. For example, such slots could be positioned in the overhanging eave portion of the panel so that when such stiffeners are inserted, they strengthen the foam in the eave portion of the panel, reducing any risk of damage to the eave.
Features from any of the disclosed embodiments may be used in combination with one another, without limitation. In addition, other features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art through consideration of the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only illustrated embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The drawings illustrate several embodiments of the invention, wherein identical reference numerals refer to identical or similar elements or features in different views or embodiments shown in the drawings.
Some ranges may be disclosed herein. Additional ranges may be defined between any values disclosed herein as being exemplary of a particular parameter. All such ranges are contemplated and within the scope of the present disclosure.
Numbers, percentages, ratios, or other values stated herein may include that value, and also other values that are about or approximately the stated value, as would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. A stated value should therefore be interpreted broadly enough to encompass values that are at least close enough to the stated value to perform a desired function or achieve a desired result, and/or values that round to the stated value. The stated values for example thus include values that are within 10%, within 5%, within 1%, etc. of a stated value.
All numbers used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about”, unless otherwise indicated. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the subject matter presented herein are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
Any directions or reference frames in the description are merely relative directions (or movements). For example, any references to “top”, “bottom”, “up” “down”, “above”, “below” or the like are merely descriptive of the relative position or movement of the related elements as shown, and it will be understood that these may change as the structure is rotated, moved, the perspective changes, etc.
All publications, patents and patent applications cited herein, whether supra or infra, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to modular building methods and systems where the building is constructed using lightweight foam modular panels in which the panels include one or more horizontal channels formed through the length of the lightweight foam body of the panel. The channels are configured to receive flexible elongate splines, which may simply be flexible strips of OSB, plywood, or the like. It will be appreciated that such splines do not necessary need to be formed of wood, such that metal splines, or even other materials (e.g., plastic, or otherwise) could be used. The splines and associated channels into which they are received are configured so that the splines are not exposed on an outside face of the lightweight body, but so that the spline is restrained in the wall (e.g., it can only slide in and out of the channel once placed—with 1 degree of freedom).
The channels may be configured to provide an interior horizontally positioned I-beam in a wall constructed with such panels, where each horizontal I-beam is positioned between vertically stacked panels. The flanges and web of each I-beam may be formed from the flexible elongate splines, such that the I-beam is not prefabricated, but is actually assembled in-situ, at the construction site, as the panels are positioned to build the wall structure. The horizontal I-beams may form part of a post and beam wall system, which the building system is particularly suited for. For example, the modular panels may be positioned between appropriately spaced apart vertical post members, while the horizontal I-beams run horizontally, between vertically stacked modular panels (i.e., along the wall's length).
The panels may include channels for additional horizontal splines, beyond those that form the I-beams between vertically stacked panels. For example, the panels may include top and bottom channels which receive splines, which become the flanges of the I-beam. The panels may also include interior channels, e.g., positioned off-center relative to a thickness of the foam panel, towards the first and opposite second faces of the panel (which faces correspond to the inside and outside of a constructed wall structure). Such interior splines may serve as furring strips, for attachment points for nails, screws or the like, e.g., for sheathing or other material positioned over the wall, away from the panels top and bottom edges.
The modular panels may have a thickness (e.g., foam thickness) that is typically greater than 4 inches, e.g., 5.5 inches, (the same width as a 2×6) or 7.25 inches (the same width as a 2×8). Because the panels include a cross-sectional geometry that is consistent across the length of the panel, they provide excellent flexibility in constructing any desired wall structure or building. For example, the foam panels may easily be cut off at whatever appropriate length, where the wall ends, or where a door, window or other opening is needed, in the horizontal direction of the wall. The vertical direction of the wall is easily formed by simply stacking a desired number of the panels on top of one another, forming the in-situ formed I-beams between each pair of stacked panels. Where desired, the top of a top-most panel could also be cut off, to accommodate an overall desired wall height, or the top-most standard wall panel may be topped with a transition panel that is configured to connect the wall panels to roof panels. Such a transition panel may include a wall portion that engages with the top-most wall panel, making up any desired additional wall height, allowing a user to accommodate any desired wall height.
The modular panels can be formed on a CNC hot wire cutting device, where all necessary deep cuts are formed (as it can be difficult to accurately cut foam material thicker than about 2 inches without such a device). Because the panels are formed under such conditions, during manufacture, high precision and accuracy are possible (which is not practical to achieve on a job site). Furthermore, by cutting the panels on such a CNC device, the rectangular panels themselves can be formed to very high precision and accuracy dimensions. For example, a 2 foot by 4 foot panel, 5.5 or 7.25 inches thick will be perfectly “square” and plumb, allowing the panel itself to be used as a square, level, or jig. This characteristic greatly reduces the need for skilled labor, as the panel itself serves as a template (i.e., no tape measure or square is needed). This helps to ensure a robust composite structure having the proper geometry (e.g., right angled walls where such is desired, level floors, level ceilings, and the like).
The present methods and systems of assembly allow for relatively open source construction, with a relatively high degree of customizability to the building being constructed, all achievable at lower cost and/or time as compared to existing methods of construction. Furthermore, even with such relative flexibility, little if any skilled labor is required. For example, a model or blueprint image of the building to be constructed could simply be provided, with the crew only being required to connect the modules as shown in the model or blueprint (e.g., akin to LEGO instructions)
It is also advantageous that the foam material (e.g., expanded polystyrene, or other foamed insulative materials) from which the modular panels are constructed may be readily available nearly anywhere, such that the foam panels may be manufactured at a foam production facility near the construction site (minimizing shipping distance and expense). This provides savings and convenience in that the foam panels can be manufactured locally, avoiding the significant expense of shipping foam (which occupies a large volume, even though it weights little).
For example, such foam may typically have a density from about 1 lb/ft3 to 2 lb/ft3, and provide an insulative value of about R4 per inch of foam thickness. A wall constructed using a 5.5 inch or 7.25 inch thick foam panel as described herein may provide an R value of about R25 or R30, respectively.
Modular panel 100 includes a lightweight body 102. Body 102 may comprise or otherwise be formed from a foam material, such as expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam. Such material may be rigid. Such panels may be precision cut from blocks of rigid, already cured EPS foam. For example, EPS foam is often available as 3×4×8 foot blocks. Such a block may be sufficient to produce several modular panels as shown in
Each panel 100 includes one or more (e.g., a plurality of) channels 104 extending horizontally through the length of panel 100. In the illustrated configuration, panel 100 includes first and second interior channels 104a, 104b, each of which is positioned off-center relative to the thickness of foam body 102, with channel 104a positioned towards (i.e., closer to) panel face 106a and channel 104b positioned towards panel face 106b (i.e., closer to panel face 106b than the center of the thickness of foam body 102). Panel 100 also includes top and bottom channels, which will be discussed in further detail hereafter. In an embodiment, such a panel may actually not include the interior channels 104a, 104b, but only the top and bottom channels (i.e., the interior channels are optional). Each of channels 104a, 104b is sized and shaped to receive therein a flexible elongate spline, where the channels 104a, 104b are not open at faces 106a and 106b of panel 100, but are only open at left and right ends 108a, 108b of panel 100. In an embodiment, splines 116 are advantageously not dimensional lumber, which although readily available, is notorious for being warped, making it difficult to slide such a spline through channels 104a, 104b. Rather, splines may be formed from oriented strand board (“OSB”), plywood, or another material that is easily inserted into such a channel, and exhibits significant flexibility in the direction of the thickness of such sheet material. Such flexibility is readily apparent when holding such a strip of such sheet material at one end, as the other end will flex significantly downward under the weight of the sheet or strip alone. Such does not occur to the same degree with dimensional lumber, even in the same dimensions, as such dimensional lumber is significantly more rigid. Such OSB or similar spline materials are easily obtained, e.g., by ripping sheets of OSB or the like, which are as readily available as dimensional lumber, but with better flexibility in such direction, while exhibiting minimal if any warping. Although such OSB strips are a particularly suitable material, it will be apparent that a variety of other wood, plastic, or even metal materials could alternatively be used for splines.
Channels 104a, 104b within panel 100 have dimensions just slightly larger than those of the elongate spline so as to not bind within the channel, but so as to be freely slidable therein (e.g., a clearance of 1/16 inch or so, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art, may be provided).
The channels (particularly top and bottom channels 104a′, 104b′, 104a″ and 104b″) which are associated with the internal horizontally extending I-beams that are formed in-situ, as the wall is assembled may be spaced apart from one another to accommodate any particular desired spacing of such I-beams, as dictated by the height of each modular panel. For example, in the illustrated configuration where the panel 100 is 2 feet high, such I-beams will be provided horizontally, 2 feet apart, between adjacent panels. Taller or shorter panels could be provided where it is desired to adjust such spacing. Similarly, the panel length (e.g., 4 feet) may dictate the spacing of adjacent vertical posts in the wall, which may be provided between adjacent panels placed side by side (while I-beams are provided between adjacent panels stacked one on top of another). Spacings other than 4 feet (e.g., 8 feet, 12 feet, etc.) for such posts, and for the panel length may be possible. Such spacing characteristics are well accepted within the building industry, and compatible with existing building codes, which allows the present panels and systems to be readily accepted and implemented, once made known by Applicant. Importantly, when a spline is received into any of the channels (104a, 104b, 104a′, 104b′, 104a″ or 104b″), the spline is not exposed on either exterior face 106a or 106b of panel 100. Applicant has found that other systems that provide for structural members or other features that are exposed on the exterior of a panel exhibit a “ghosting” problem, in that even once such structures are finished over, because of the different material characteristics underlying drywall or other sheathing associated with such surface exposure at the face during framing, there is a noticeable “ghost” that shows up through paint or other interior or exterior wall finishes that plague such systems. It is thus important that no such spline surface exposure is provided with the present panels. The full interior and exterior faces 106a, 106b are provided entirely by the material from which the lightweight foam body is formed (e.g., EPS).
In addition to “ghosting” issues, exposure of splines on the exterior surface also can result in thermal bridging problems, e.g., particularly where metal sheathing is present (e.g., on a roof or otherwise). By ensuring that the splines are positioned internally, rather than externally exposed, there is less of a problem of thermal bridging through the wall, which increases overall insulative efficiency of the wall, roof or other building structure constructed therefrom. Where thermal bridging occurs, undesired condensation can often occur in such spots due to a thermal gradient associated with such thermal bridging. The present systems ensure there is a thermal break between such structural spline members and any metal or other sheathing that may eventually be placed over roofs, walls, or the like.
Furthermore, because the splines are positioned within the panel thickness, with approximately 1 to 2 inches of foam thickness between the spline and the nearest face, building codes do not require that electrical wiring (e.g., 120V) be run within conduit, as there is at least 1.5 inches between the exterior of any sheathing (e.g., ½ inch or ⅝ inch drywall or the like) applied over the panel and such electrical wiring. In addition, as shown in
In
In any case, when attaching such drywall or other sheathing, the present system avoids point loading onto screws, nails, or other fasteners employed, because of the foam thickness (e.g., 1 to 2 inches) between the sheathing and the spline encased within the foam panel. Such avoidance of point loading can be beneficial in an earthquake or the like, which may otherwise cause such fasteners to shear off.
In addition to the various internal, top and bottom channels described, the illustrated panel 100 further includes a pre-cut slot 112 in face 106a of panel 100, centered relative to channel 104a. Pre-cut slot 112 extends from first face 106a into channel 104a. For example, such a pre-cut slot allows internal formation of channel 104a in body 102 with a CNC controlled hot wire cutter. The width of slot 112 is advantageously very narrow, e.g., rather than providing a wide opening from channel 104a to the area adjacent face 106a. For example, where the height of channel 104a may be just over 3 inches (e.g., to accommodate a 3 inch spline), the width of slot 112 (the width of which is parallel thereto) may be no more than 0.25 inch, or no more than 0.125 inch. Stated another way, the width of slot 112 may be no more than 20% of, 15% of, 10% of, or no more than 5% of the transverse cross-sectional height of channel 104a. On the face 106b, opposite face 106a, there is shown another pre-cut slot 112, identically configured, but with respect to channel 104b and face 106b. The alignment of slots 112 with interior channels 104 is further beneficial once a wall structure has been built, where the panels are stacked one over another, as the channels and splines may no longer be visible. The slots 112 are visible in such circumstances, allowing a user to quickly and easily see where the splines are located within a given wall structure. Such slots 112 make attachment of drywall or other sheathing over the foam panels very easy, as the slots 112 mark the location of the center of the splines, which are easily nailed or screwed into, through the thickness of the foam between channels 104 and each respective face 106a, 106b. As internal channels 104a, 104b are optional, if they are not included, the such pre-cut slots may also be omitted.
While web spline 116′ may only have a length that is equal to that of the panel 100 (e.g., 4 feet), the splines that form the flanges of the I-beam 117 may have a length greater than the panel, so as to extend across the vertical post 138, as shown in
Any of the splines may be more securely retained within any of the channels with any suitable adhesive. Without use of such an adhesive, the building system may actually be reversible, allowing dis-assembly of the components in a way that allows them to easily and quickly be re-assembled, e.g., at a different time, or in a different location. Such characteristics may be particularly beneficial for temporary structures (e.g., emergency housing, sets for plays or other drama productions, and the like). Where an adhesive is used, such adhesive may be injected into the channel through pre-cut slot 112 (for channels 104), injected directly into the open top or bottom channels (for channels 104a′, 104b′ 104a″ or 104b″), or placed on the splines 116, prior to channel insertion. Once drywall or other sheathing is placed over the foam panel faces 106a or 106b, nails or screws may further be used to secure such sheathing to the splines 116 within any of such channels.
As described above, the splines 116 may have a length that is greater than the length of a given modular panel 100, such that a single spline 116 runs through aligned channels (similarly numbered) of more than one modular panel, positioned side by side.
Many of the following Figures described hereafter show various configurations and uses in which the panels, splines, and building systems may be employed, as well as methods of use therefore.
Any desired roof pitch may be accommodated by such construction. Exemplary pitches include any desired pitch ratio, such as from 12/1 to 12/18 (e.g., 12/1; 12/2, 12/3; 12/4; 12/5; 12/6; 12/7; 12/8; 12/9; 12/10; 12/11; 12/12; 12/13; 12/14; 12/15; 12/16; 12/17; or 12/18). Another roof configuration using a transition panel is shown and described hereafter, in
While shown with straight planar walls, it will be appreciated that curved walls are also possible, e.g., by providing closely spaced (e.g., 6 inches or less, 4 inches or less, 3 inches or less, or 2 inches or less, such as 1 inch spacing) pre-cut slits into at least one face of the panel that is to be used in forming a curved wall. Such slits would allow the panel to be flexed, creating a curved face.
A strap or any other desired typical connector may be used to attach any of the vertical posts 138 to a foundation, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, in light of the present disclosure.
While electrical raceways 136 may provide a simple way to make electrical runs, other methods for wiring a structure using the present panel, post and beam constructions are also possible. For example, because the exterior of the wall prior to sheathing is formed from a material such as EPS foam that is easily worked, a portable hot wire cutting tool may be used to quickly cut traces or raceways through the foam face, in any configuration desired, for receipt of electrical wiring. Furthermore, current code allows such wiring to not need any conduit, where there is 1.5 inches or more between the exterior of any eventually applied sheathing, and the location of the wiring. The 1-2 inch foam thickness before reaching any of the channels (i.e., spline), coupled with a typical ½ inch or ⅝ inch drywall sheathing allows the wiring to simply be pressed into grooves cut into the foam face during wiring of the building, without the need for any conduit for housing such wiring.
Where the wiring crosses over a spline, a spiked or other metal plate may simply be pressed over the wiring, over the spline, to prevent a fastener from penetrating the wiring, when attempting to fasten into the spline. Such forming of a raceway in the face of the panels can be quickly and easily accomplished after the panels have been raised into the desired wall structures, during wiring of the building. A portable hot wire groove cutting tool can be used for such raceway formation. Such a tool is very quick (e.g., an 8 foot groove length may be formed in a matter of seconds, and the grooves may be freely run over the face of the panels, without regard to spline location, and without passage through any splines (as would be typical in traditional framing). For example, such a groove may simply be “drawn” from a switch or other location to where the power is to be delivered (e.g., a light, outlet, etc.) in a straight line, across the panel(s) face(s).
In an embodiment, either the interior, exterior, or both foam panel faces of walls of a building may be tiled over with cementitious panels, e.g., such as available from Applicant. Because of the presence of the splines within the channels of the wall system, screws or other fasteners may be used for such attachment. An adhesive may additionally or alternatively be used. Any suitable adhesive may be used to adhere such panels to the foam face. While epoxy or urethane adhesives may be suitable in theory, a polymer modified cement based adhesive may be preferred, as the urethane and epoxy adhesives have been found by the present inventor to be finicky, making it difficult if a user wishes to reposition a panel once it has initially been placed over the adhesive coated foam.
For example, the epoxy and urethane adhesives typically set very quickly, providing little time for the user to perform any needed repositioning or adjustment of a placed panel. Furthermore, because the bonding strength is so great, when attempting to reposition such a bonded panel, chunks of underlying foam may be pulled from the foam frame structure (floor, wall, ceiling, roof, or the like) when attempting debonding, which is of course problematic. A polymer modified cement based adhesive provides greater cure time, allowing some flexibility in positioning, and repositioning, before the bond between the panel and foam frame member becomes permanent and strong. That said, urethane and epoxy adhesives (e.g., foaming adhesives) may also be used, where desired. Methods and other characteristics for such tiling, information relative to adhesives, and the like is found within Applicant's Application Serial No. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/426,756 (18944.9), herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Examples of Applicant's other building systems which may include various features that can be incorporated to some degree herein include U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 13/866,569; 13/436,403; 62/722,591; 62/746,118; 16/549,901, and 16/653,579, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The last four patent applications describe exterior applied sealants that may be used, as such, in the present invention.
All components and steps of the method and system can be handled without heavy equipment (e.g., cranes), with the possible exception of any very large, heavy reinforcing structural members that may be embedded in any of the foam modular panel members, positioned between such panels, or the like. In fact, the modular panels are so light as to be easily handled and positioned by a crew of women. For example, the panels (e.g., 2 feet×4 feet) may weigh less than 40 lbs, less than 30 lbs, less than 20 lbs, or less than 15 lbs. The splines may also be handled and positioned by a crew of women. For example, because strips of such OSB material are very light (e.g., less than 10, 5 or even 3 lbs), and/or because there is typically no need to use splines that are of a single piece of continuous material, such crew members could push scrap material (e.g., scrap OSB strips) into the channels, which scrap material could serve as the splines. As a result, a construction site using such methods may generate very little, if any waste, e.g., far less such waste than is generated when using traditional framing techniques. In addition, it will be apparent that when constructing a given building, far fewer 2×4s will be needed, as there are no conventional single “studs” present in the construction, but rather use of OSB or similar elongate strips of material, as the splines are used, in conjunction with vertical post members (which may be formed from pairs of 2×4s), but which are only spaced typically every 4 feet, requiring far fewer 2×4s than a typical frame construction in which 2×4 studs are spaced at 24 or 16 inches on center.
The floor panel may not include channels adjacent the bottom face of the floor panels 204 (such panels may simply be positioned over a pea gravel base or the like). A notch 206 that is exposed on the bottom face of such floor panels 204 may be provided, e.g., to raise the floor panels up off such a gravel or other base, should such be desired.
The building system includes a frame that carries loads from the splines to the frame to the foundation. The frame can be designed to include any conceivable architectural shape, and can be engineered to handle appropriate external loads. The frame can act as a template in which splines and the insulating lightweight panels can be attached. This allows the splines and lightweight panels to remain standardized, with unique frames (formed from frame members) and unique transition panels defining the shape of the structure. This system makes it possible to construct walls, floors and roof of the system with precisely the same method.
Transition panel 200 is also shown as including various shaped slots 203 for insertion of eave stiffening members, or to provide attachment points for facia, etc. The illustrated configuration includes a C-shaped slot 203 running horizontally, parallel to the free eave end E of the transition panel 200. As shown, a pre-cut slot 112 may be provided in eave end E, e.g., centered on C-shaped slot 203. In the illustrated configuration, the open end of the C is oriented inward, away from eave end E, providing an attachment point into which facia or other covering structures can be screwed, nailed, or otherwise fastened into. Other shaped slots could be provided, for receiving other shaped spline members (e.g., I-beam shaped, H-beam shaped, L-shaped, etc.).
Transition panel 200 may be described as including 3 portions—a wall leg (terminating in channels 104a″, 104b″) that mates with the adjacent top-most wall panel of the wall being constructed; a roof leg (terminating in channels 105a′, 105b′) that mates with the adjacent first roof panel of the pitched roof being constructed; and an eave portion, e.g., coplanar with the roof portion, but extending oppositely, away from channels 105a′, 105b′ and the roof portion, so as to form an eave of a desired configuration. It will be apparent that the length of the wall leg and the length of the roof leg can be independently specifically selected as needed, to accommodate a desired wall height (that is not an even multiple of the height of the standard panel 100), as well as to accommodate a desired roof plane length (that is not an even multiple of the width of the standard panel 100 used on the roof). Adjustments in roof plane length can also be made by adjusting the lengths of the two ends of the roof cap transition panel 202.
As shown, the structure can be supported on a plurality of pier footings 218. Such a configuration as described does not require the use of any continuous footings, or the use of a typical concrete or similar slab. The present configurations may advantageously be void of such features, which otherwise increase costs, and result in decreased comfort (e.g., the present configuration provides for an insulated, “soft” floor, as compared to a concrete slab, as will be apparent from the present description).
Turning to
While I-beam configurations are shown in particular, it will be appreciated that other geometry beams (e.g., C-beams, H-beams, L-beams, or other shapes, providing other moment of inertia characteristics) could alternatively be used for positioning in between any of the various modular panels, as splines.
Because the panels 100 used on the floor are rotated (laid horizontally (e.g., “on the ground” instead of oriented vertically, as in a wall construction), what would be “top” and “bottom” channels are now simply adjacent to the top and bottom faces of the panel, on the right, and left sides. As shown, the floor may actually be a “floating floor”, positioned above the ground in which the pier footings are positioned. While a pea gravel other base could be provided, such is not necessary, and may not be present.
As shown in
The height of any desired wall can be accommodated (even where the height does not correspond to an even multiple of the standard panel height, such as 2 feet), by adjusting the length of the vertical wall leg W (
A similar adjustment to the length of the roof plane is similarly provided by the length that is selected for the roof leg (the leg that is adjacent to the wall leg W, which is angled therefrom, at an angle corresponding to the pitch of the roof being formed). In other words, accommodation of specific roof plane lengths are possible by adjusting the length of the roof leg of panel 200, (i.e., that leg including channels 105a′ and 105b′). The length of this roof leg portion of the wall-to-roof transition panel 200 allows selection of an appropriate length to accommodate a desired roof length for the roof which it forms a top portion of.
It is also apparent that the transition panel also dictates the shape and length of the eave associated with the roof. Such integration of the eave into the transition panel 200 is advantageous, as it eliminates the need for construction of separate eave members (which is time consuming, and tedious, as those in the construction trade will appreciate). For example, the eave portion of the panel 200 is shown as being coplanar with the roof leg, extending oppositely therefrom (i.e., on the other side from the roof leg, relative to the wall leg W that separates the eave portion from the roof leg of the transition panel 200).
As shown in
As shown in
By way of example, the standard (and other panels) may each be provided in a standard dimension, such as 2 feet in height, by 8 feet in length. Such exemplary panels are lightweight, for example, weighing about 6 lbs for the standard panels 100 shown. If pre-fabricated I-beams 117 are used, e.g., made of aluminum, such similarly only weigh about 7 lbs. The system is thus easily employed by those of limited strength, and without any skilled training.
While the Figures illustrate construction of simple exemplary walls and buildings to illustrate concepts of the present construction methods and systems, it will be appreciated that the methods and systems may be used to construct a nearly endless variety of buildings.
It will also be appreciated that the present claimed invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative, not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope. Additionally, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The present application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/991,889, filed Mar. 19, 2020, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. The present application is also a continuation-in part under 35 U.S.C. 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/709,674 filed Dec. 10, 2019, which claims priority to and the benefit of United States Provisional Patent Application Nos. 62/777,648 filed Dec. 10, 2018 and 62/890,818 filed Aug. 23, 2019, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2202783 | Morrell | May 1940 | A |
| 2321567 | Wilson | Jun 1943 | A |
| 2844848 | Couse et al. | Jul 1958 | A |
| 3236014 | Edgar | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3284980 | Dinkel | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3310917 | Simon | Mar 1967 | A |
| 3353315 | Barker | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3374703 | Davis | Mar 1968 | A |
| 3517468 | Woods | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3529390 | Stetter | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3646715 | Pope | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3699731 | Arnold | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3775916 | Bair | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3808085 | Givens | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3888055 | Gallo | Jun 1975 | A |
| 4035972 | Timmons | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4435928 | Huling, III | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4443988 | Coutu, Sr. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4578909 | Henley | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4578915 | Schneller | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4615448 | Johnstonbaugh | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4617219 | Schupack | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4641468 | Slater | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4774794 | Grieb | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4893451 | Valente | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4944416 | Petersen | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5003742 | Dettbarn | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5030502 | Teare | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5062387 | Anderson | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5121578 | Holz | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5138803 | Grossen | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5172532 | Gibbar | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5173233 | Kafarowski | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5181353 | Harrington, Jr. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5231813 | Drawdy | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5268226 | Sweeney | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5353560 | Heydon | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5353562 | Decker | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5377470 | Hebinck | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5390462 | Kreiter | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5403062 | Sjostedt et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| D384108 | Rinicella | Sep 1997 | S |
| 5694730 | Del Rincon | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5803964 | Scarborough | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822940 | Carlin | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5899037 | Josey | May 1999 | A |
| 5901522 | Slater | May 1999 | A |
| 5921046 | Hammond, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5927032 | Record | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5950389 | Porter | Sep 1999 | A |
| D444577 | Neuhofer | Jul 2001 | S |
| 6305135 | Inaba | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6324809 | Nelson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6460302 | Neuhaus, III | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470632 | Smith | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6481172 | Porter | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6571523 | Chambers | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| D477423 | Campbell | Jul 2003 | S |
| 6701683 | Messenger | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6772890 | Campbell | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6985832 | Saebi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7028440 | Brisson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7036196 | Salatin | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7093726 | Holztrager | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7165374 | Ohanesian | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7712265 | Overmyer | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7779600 | Saebi | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7913730 | Schaffeld | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8151539 | Grinsted | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8220648 | Barkdoll | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8468767 | McBride | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8627625 | Bouchard | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8695299 | Propst | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 9234355 | Sealock et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| D861194 | Morrow | Sep 2019 | S |
| 10450736 | Morrow | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10865560 | Morrow | Dec 2020 | B1 |
| 20050284060 | Ritchie | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060046068 | Barancyk et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207479 | Hughes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070131308 | Martin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080282632 | Sleeman | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090100780 | Mathis | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090205277 | Gibson | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100011699 | Weimer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083590 | Wochnik | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095625 | Boutaghou | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136269 | Andersen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20110067331 | Grinsted | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173911 | Propst | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110214374 | Propst | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120011793 | Clark | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20130008129 | Hall | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130086850 | Morrow | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130216760 | Bol | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130227902 | Van Sloun | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130266370 | Gunther | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140250827 | Gillman | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150135634 | Hoie | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20160014995 | Bruno | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160208489 | Gibson | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170096825 | Bree | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170121958 | Jin | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170211268 | Eichhorn et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20180298600 | Moss | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20190242109 | Morrow | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20200001583 | Eichhorn et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200354945 | Morrow | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20210040733 | Morrow | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210040759 | Morrow | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210301528 | Dombowsky et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3034601 | Apr 1982 | DE |
| 2359942 | Jul 1976 | FR |
| 2261234 | May 1993 | GB |
| H07-102680 | Apr 1995 | JP |
| H10-148095 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| 2002-292612 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 10-1993-0010328 | Jun 1993 | KR |
| 10-2009-0065909 | Jun 2009 | KR |
| 2013-052427 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2018194528 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| 2021118744 | Jun 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,901, dated Sep. 4, 2020. |
| U.S. Application filed on Aug. 23, 2019. by Morrow., U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,901. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,569, filed Apr. 19, 2013, Morrow. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,756, filed Feb. 7, 2017, Morrow. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/648,685, filed May 23, 2018, Morrow. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/658,417, filed Jul. 31, 2018, Morrow. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2012/058344 dated Mar. 28, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,403, Feb. 13, 2013, Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,403, Aug. 1, 2013, Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/866,569, Jun. 20, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,756, Feb. 23, 2018, Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/987,366, Feb. 14, 2019, Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/709,674, Apr. 6, 2020, Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/648,685, Feb. 15, 2019, Ex Parte Quayle Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/648,685, May 9, 2019, Notice of Allowance. |
| Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,901, dated Mar. 12, 2021, 6 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,901, dated Apr. 16, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/942,166, dated Nov. 23, 2021, 8 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/436,403, filed Mar. 30, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/824,209, filed Mar. 19, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/722,591, filed Aug. 24, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/890,818, filed Aug. 23, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/991,889, filed Mar. 19, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/942,166, filed Jul. 29, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/744,477, filed Jul. 29, 2020. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210040722 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62991889 | Mar 2020 | US | |
| 62777648 | Dec 2018 | US | |
| 62890818 | Aug 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16709674 | Dec 2019 | US |
| Child | 16824209 | US |
