The present invention relates to load bearing architectural columns and related structures of the type often used in residential (and similar) construction.
The use of columns as supporting structural elements is common throughout history with the most notable and classic styles having been developed in ancient Greece and Rome.
The aesthetic appeal of columns, combined with their structural advantages, makes them a favorite architectural element in residential housing and related structures.
Historically, of course, columns were made of stone or other heavy materials. Indeed, many structures continue to use columns of this type. Although such column materials are structurally sound, in less-demanding applications such as residential construction they can be somewhat impractical.
More recent developments include decorative columns formed from materials such as extruded aluminum formed into hollow columns with sidewalls that support compression loads along the axis of the column. These are, however, still relatively heavy making the columns difficult to transport, manipulate, and fix in a structure. Because the columns are hollow, they have some aesthetically undesirable characteristics such as rattling and offering a hollow sound when struck.
As an alternative, ornamental columns and arch structures for residential and similar structures have been custom fabricated from wood Other pre-fabricated columns are formed from fiberglass-reinforced plastics. Others are formed from fiber structures with resin infusion. Other columns are made using continuous filament winding processes.
For reasons of cost and availability, the structural (weight-bearing) functions of many residential columns are based upon a four inch by four inch (“4×4”) treated wood post surrounded by a decorative column exterior. Although the appearance of such treated posts is generally aesthetically unacceptable (with the exception of decking and related structures) they have the advantage of relatively low cost and wide ranging availability. Adding the column exterior provides the desired appearance.
Treated wood posts nevertheless are relatively heavy. Being formed of wood, they will almost invariably twist, bow and warp in use. Additionally, the natural expansion and contraction of wood based upon temperature and humidity conditions causes problems in keeping the post adhered to the remainder of the column. Wooden structures are also susceptible to attack from termites, carpenter ants, and fungi.
As a result, if the decorative portion of the column is attached directly to the treated post, the warping and twisting of the treated post will damage the decorative exterior. Thus, the treated post and decorative shell should be spaced from one another. Additionally, the chemical compositions used to treat the wood against rotting or other decomposition tend to bleed from the post and onto the surrounding structure. The wood-preservative compositions can also tend to accelerate the oxidation of metals, and thus can adversely affect any nails, screws or other fasteners used in or near the column.
As another problem, in a post and shell structure the treated post needs to be centered within the decorative portion of the column and avoid touching the PVC shell. As a result, the post's location is often determined by the desired position of the decorative exterior of the column rather than the structural requirements of the end use.
As yet another problem, a 4×4 treated post is typically put into position by being glued to a concrete pad at the bottom and then being toe nailed to the cross beam at the top. A toe-nail is, however, a relatively weak fastening technique. Toe-nailing tends to split and weaken the wood. Toe-nailing is also less exact than other types of connections and will in time to allow the column to shift. Because of the angle of the screw or nail, maximum holding strength cannot be achieved. This is less than desirable from a structural standpoint even if consistent with building codes. Over time, the glued and toe-nailed structure will eventually crack and fail.
Additionally, the fibers nature of wood allows water to wick up from the bottom of the post eventually causing structural failure.
In one aspect the invention is a lightweight load bearing architectural column comprising an exterior shell formed of a plurality of walls that together define an open interior. An interior load bearing shaft is within the exterior shell and is proportionally smaller than the exterior shell. One portion of the interior shaft is connected against one interior wall of the exterior shell with the remaining portions of the interior shaft being independent of the other interior walls of the interior shell.
In another aspect, the invention is an architectural structure that includes a generally horizontal floor and a generally horizontal beam above and spaced apart from the horizontal floor. A vertically oriented load bearing shaft is between the floor and the beam for supporting the beam through the shaft and on the horizontal floor. The structure also includes an exterior shell formed of a plurality of walls that together define an open interior with one portion of the interior shaft being connected against one interior wall of the exterior shell with the remaining portions of the interior shaft being independent of the other interior walls of the interior shell.
In another aspect, the invention is a decorative architectural column that includes a tapered exterior decorative polymer column shell formed of a plurality of contiguous walls that together define a base having a first area at one common end of the walls and a capital having a second area at the opposite end of the walls. The capital area is smaller than the base area so that the difference in size between the area of the base and the area of the capital produces a taper longitudinally along the column. An interior load bearing shaft is surrounded by the decorative polymer column and spaced from the tapering walls so that the load bearing shaft and the exterior shell avoid touching one another. A fixture is positioned at the base of the column and on the interior of the shell and connects to at least one, but less than all, of the contiguous walls and also connects to the shaft.
In yet another aspect the invention is an architectural structure that includes a generally horizontal floor and a generally horizontal beam above and spaced apart from the horizontal floor. A vertically oriented load bearing shaft is between the base and the beam for supporting the beam through the shaft and on the horizontal floor. The structure includes a tapered exterior decorative polymer column shell formed of a plurality of contiguous walls that together define a base having a first area at one common end of the walls and a capital having a second area at the opposite end of the walls and with the capital area being smaller than the base area so that the difference in size between the area of the base and the area of the capital produces a taper longitudinally along the column. A fixture is positioned at the base of the column and on the interior of the column and connects to at least one, but less than all, of the contiguous walls and also connects to the metal shaft.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention and the manner in which the same are accomplished will become clearer based on the followed detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Cellular PVC has a number of favorable characteristics. It can be placed in direct contact with masonry, is moisture resistant, does not need to be painted, and is resistant to insects, rot and weather. It can be handled like wood including cutting, routing, drilling, and nailing. Cellular PVC can be bonded to itself with standard PVC cement or bonded to wood using standard construction adhesives. Cellular foamed PVC is widely commercially available, and is made using processes that are generally well-established in the art (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,764,642 and 4,383,812).
Other materials suitable for the exterior shell include wood (e.g., cedar), composite board and solid polymers. As used herein (and generally in the art) “composite board” refers to a consolidated mat of wood materials (such as particles, chips or fibers) typically bound (under heat and pressure) with another material (usually a polymer resin) and often containing a preservative or fungicide such as zinc borate.
An interior load bearing shaft broadly designated at 26 and typically (but not exclusively) formed of metal is positioned within the exterior shell 21. The interior metal shaft 26 is proportionally smaller than the exterior shell 21. One portion of the interior metal shaft 26 is connected against one interior wall of the exterior shell 21 with the remaining portions of the interior shaft 26 being independent of the other interior walls of the exterior shell 21.
In particular,
The mounting bracket 31 includes a plurality of openings 34 (two are illustrated) to permit screws or nails to fix the bracket 31 to (for example) the floor 12 or the ceiling 13 illustrated in
For example, in
In a manner analogous to
In this embodiment, the interior load bearing metal shaft is broadly designated at 26 and is surrounded by the decorative exterior shell 36 and spaced from the tapering walls 37, 40, 41 and 42 so that the load bearing shaft 26 and the decorative exterior shell 36 avoid touching one another.
Because
In the drawings and specification there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms have been employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being defined in the claims.
This Application claims priority as a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/858,229, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,015,775, filed on Sep. 20, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety as if set forth fully herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 849951 | White | Apr 1907 | A |
| 950806 | Richardson | Mar 1910 | A |
| 969097 | Ford | Aug 1910 | A |
| 973615 | Barrick | Oct 1910 | A |
| 1350686 | Trudelle | Aug 1920 | A |
| 1934260 | Dean | Nov 1933 | A |
| 2733785 | Beatty | Feb 1956 | A |
| 3135363 | Bourassa | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3282001 | Bigalow | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3324613 | Duboff | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3421269 | Medow | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3698564 | Muller | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3764642 | Boutillier | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3842557 | Brown | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3945741 | Wendt | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4048776 | Sato | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4070837 | Sato | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4074811 | Filak | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4104000 | Fleishmann | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4125217 | Sato | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4216634 | Binder | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4353411 | Harter et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4383812 | Calcagni | May 1983 | A |
| 4587893 | Brockhaus et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4589332 | Brockhaus et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4641467 | Dupuis, Jr. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4684097 | Cox | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4738061 | Herndon | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4841708 | Johnston | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4899497 | Madl, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 5063719 | Matsuo et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5342138 | Saito et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5605023 | Biernazki | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5617697 | Erwin | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5660013 | Saldarelli et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5671580 | Chou | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5692351 | Morrison, III et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5794395 | Reed | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5862642 | Erwin | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5873671 | West | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5901525 | Doeringer et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5934035 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6003277 | Graham et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6065268 | Gump | May 2000 | A |
| 6141928 | Platt | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6176053 | St. Germain | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6305670 | Ward et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6467756 | Elasser | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6579481 | Auman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6640517 | Mitchell | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6874766 | Curatolo | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6898882 | Kim | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6908577 | Auman | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 7219873 | Harwood | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7243473 | Terrels | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7470091 | Scholl | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7543802 | Petta et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7726091 | Frohlich et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7762016 | Davidson | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 20020116893 | Waldrop | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20030101679 | Erwin | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20070234662 | Hanig et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 39614 | Nov 1981 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120000154 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11858229 | Sep 2007 | US |
| Child | 13231708 | US |