Bicycle rollers are well known devices for supporting a bicycle and permitting a user to mount and ride the bicycle with the rear wheel rotatably supported by a pair of rear rollers and the front wheel rotatably supported by a single front roller. Motion permitting bicycle rollers include the above described device mounted on wheels or some other motion permitting assembly, so that the rollers and bicycle can move slightly forward and rearward during use, limited by a motion-resisting assembly. To provide a realistic riding sensation, the motion-resisting assembly must permit from 5 to 10 cm of forward and rearward movement, gently resisted and urged back to a center point. To achieve this goal, some currently available systems include an outer frame, which provides a stationary track for movement and an anchor point for one or more elastic members (“bungies”) which gently resist the movement. This produces a far more realistic sensation of bicycle riding. Also, however, it is virtually impossible to build an easily collapsible assembly, using this basic structure, because of the two frames.
Whether motion permitting or not, currently available bicycle rollers connect the front roller and rear rollers with a pair of structural rails running along the sides of the rollers about 15 cm off the ground, suspending the rollers above the ground and carrying the weight of the cyclist. Accordingly, these rails present a trip hazard to the user mounting or dismounting from a bicycle mounted on the rollers. When a rider loses his balance and must dismount very quickly, these rails present a particular hazard.
With respect to motion permitting rollers, the current designs tend to be somewhat heavier than would be ideally desirable, and are not collapsible, for easy transport.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.
In a first separate aspect, the present invention may take the form of a bicycle rollers device, having a frame that includes a rear mounting assembly for two rear rollers; a front mounting assembly for a front roller; support elements, for supporting the frame above a surface, upon which the support elements are set to rest; and a central bridge connecting the front drum assembly to the rear drum assembly. Also, two rear rollers are mounted in the rear mounting assembly and a front roller is mounted in the front mounting assembly and defines a roller width. Finally, the central bridge is more narrow than the roller width, thereby permitting a bicycle rider to mount and dismount a bicycle set on the rollers without encountering the central bridge.
In a second separate aspect, the present invention may take the form of a bicycle rollers device, having a frame that includes a rear roller mounting assembly for two rear rollers; a front roller mounting assembly for a front roller; and a central bridge assembly connecting the front mounting assembly to the rear mounting gear. Also, two rear rollers are mounted in the rear mounting assembly, and a front roller is mounted in the front mounting assembly, each of the rollers having an axis of rotation. Finally, a set of wheels, each rotatably mounted on the roller axles, so as to support the rollers above a surface upon which the wheels are set, the wheels permitting forward and rearward motion of the support assembly and all six of the wheels having an axis of rotation co-incident with the roller axes of rotation.
In a third separate aspect, the present invention may take the form of a bicycle rollers device, having a frame that includes a rear roller mounting assembly for two rear rollers; a front roller mounting assembly for a front roller; and a central bridge assembly connecting the front mounting assembly to the rear mounting gear. Also, two rear rollers are mounted in the rear mounting assembly, and a front roller is mounted in the front mounting assembly and a set of wheels are mounted on the roller axles so as to support the rollers above a surface upon which the wheels are set, the wheels permitting forward and rearward motion of the support assembly. Finally, a motion-resisting assembly, includes one of the set of wheels, which is a motion-resisting wheel, having a wheel attachment element displaced from the axis of rotation, a frame attachment element on the frame, and an elastic tension member, which is attached to the frame attachment element and the wheel attachment element, wherein the motion-resisting wheel has a centered position in which the elastic tension member is at its shortest and wherein when the motion-resisting wheel rotates from the centered position the elastic tension member urges it toward its centered position.
In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by study of the following detailed descriptions.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The folding of device 10 from the configuration shown in
Central column 72 is made of rectangular polyvinyl tube 14 cm×3.8 cm in transverse dimension, having wall thickness of 2.3 mm. The remainder of the frame 11 is made of either aluminum or steel. In one embodiment the entire device 10 has a mass of less than 8 kg. In an alternative embodiment device 10 has a mass of less than 9 kg. And in yet another alternative, device 10 has a mass of less than 10 kg.
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those possessed of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
581835 | Sturgis | May 1897 | A |
602546 | Tarver | Apr 1898 | A |
604200 | Vogeler | May 1898 | A |
2498047 | Myers | Feb 1950 | A |
2623302 | Shields | Dec 1952 | A |
2805860 | Littig | Sep 1957 | A |
3526042 | Nelson | Sep 1970 | A |
3686776 | Dahl | Aug 1972 | A |
3871648 | Mauer, III | Mar 1975 | A |
3905597 | Tabb | Sep 1975 | A |
4026546 | Omori | May 1977 | A |
4082265 | Berkes | Apr 1978 | A |
4352363 | Wilson | Oct 1982 | A |
4415152 | Smith | Nov 1983 | A |
D280225 | Eagle | Aug 1985 | S |
4580983 | Cassini et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4595194 | Previtali | Jun 1986 | A |
4709917 | Yang | Dec 1987 | A |
4743012 | Kim | May 1988 | A |
4750737 | Smith | Jun 1988 | A |
4779863 | Yang | Oct 1988 | A |
4802666 | Rodriqguez | Feb 1989 | A |
4834363 | Sargeant et al. | May 1989 | A |
4925183 | Kim | May 1990 | A |
4932651 | Defaux | Jun 1990 | A |
4938475 | Sargeant et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4958832 | Kim | Sep 1990 | A |
4982953 | Makishi | Jan 1991 | A |
5010763 | Schneider | Apr 1991 | A |
5042795 | Bursik | Aug 1991 | A |
5076792 | Niermann | Dec 1991 | A |
5100127 | Melnick et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5205800 | Grant | Apr 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5314391 | Potash et al. | May 1994 | A |
5364271 | Aknin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5385519 | Hsu et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5492516 | Trotter | Feb 1996 | A |
5662559 | Vasquez | Sep 1997 | A |
5800314 | Sakakibara et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5919119 | Bohmer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6004243 | Ewert | Dec 1999 | A |
6056672 | Carbonell Tendero | May 2000 | A |
6123547 | Teresi | Sep 2000 | A |
6123647 | Mitchell | Sep 2000 | A |
6126571 | Parks | Oct 2000 | A |
6126575 | Wang | Oct 2000 | A |
6135924 | Gibbs et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6394239 | Carlson | May 2002 | B1 |
6416444 | Lim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447424 | Ashby et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454679 | Radow | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6500098 | Werner | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6716106 | Wang et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6837830 | Eldridge | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857992 | Kolda et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7060009 | Greenleaf | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7220219 | Papadopoulos et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7942790 | Papadopoulos | May 2011 | B2 |
20020055422 | Airmet et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040053751 | Pizolato | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040077465 | Schmidt | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040198562 | Greenleaf | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050164843 | Papadopoulos et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050209064 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221960 | Miyamaru et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060217237 | Rhodes et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070060453 | Papadopoulos | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070099768 | Comair et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070202998 | Wan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090264261 | Papadopoulos | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100234188 | Wan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110287901 | Wan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
23333529 | Jul 1977 | FR |
2657024 | Jul 1991 | FR |
WO9423807 | Oct 1994 | NZ |
1319881 | Jun 1987 | SU |
0136055 | May 2001 | WO |
WO2005035072 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2007033254 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lloyd et ai, “The mechanical efficiency of treadmill running against a horizontal impeding force,” J. Physiol., vol. 223, pp. 355-363 (1972). |
Christensen et ai, “Inertial-Force Feedback for the Treadport Locomotion Interface”, Presence, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-14 (Feb. 2000). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150133272 A1 | May 2015 | US |