Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Most everyone involved with airships has wondered if it would be possible to use vacuum bottles instead of helium filled ballonets to provide lift for airships. After all, a vacuum is even lighter than helium. And by using relief valves and vacuum pumps, vertical takeoffs and landings would be possible.
When constructing our vacuum bottles, there is really only one important consideration. The bottles must be lighter than the air they displace. This is what gives the bottles positive buoyancy and allows them to float.
So far, So good . . . except for one thing . . . At sea level, the atmosphere exerts the enormous crushing force of more than 2000 pounds per square foot along the surface of the bottles. So using conventional materials, and conventional construction techniques, there were two possible outcomes for your efforts. Either the bottles were able to stand up to atmospheric pressure; in which case, the bottles were too heavy to float. Or the bottles were light enough to float, but were crushed under the weight of the atmosphere. In either case, your airship never got off the ground.
This document defines materials and methods that will facilitate the production of vacuum bottles that are lighter than the air they displace, while being strong enough to stand up to atmospheric pressure.
In U.S. Pat. No. (4,113,206), David Wheeler describes a geodesic structure that is lighter than the air it displaces. The intent is to evacuate the air from inside the structure so that the structure will float in the atmosphere. But even with today's super strong and super light composite materials, a working model has never been built.
Known in the prior art are vacuum vessels made either by joining cylindrically contoured sections together, by capping the ends of tubing, by filament winding techniques, and geodesic construction. All of these structures have one thing in common, and that is, the tension and compression members are one and the same. In other words, if a point load is placed on the outside of the vessel, then the outside of the vessel will be in compression while inside will respond with tension. Any structure where one side of a member is in tension while the other side is in compression can be very brittle. An egg is a good example. The construction techniques used in my invention ensure that members are either in tension or compression, but not both. This has three advantages: First, because the tension and compression members are separate and distinct, you can create some distance between them. This gives great toughness and flexibility. A suspension bridge is a good example of this. Toughness and flexibility are very important in rigid airship design because wind shear and impact are very common modes of failure and disaster. Second, you can optimize rather than compromise the members for either tension or compression strength. This results in members of much less weight for the same strength. And third, all of the new super strong, super lightweight, and super expensive materials, exhibit their strength in tension only. So having separate and distinct tension and compression members allows the designer to build the compression members from less expensive materials.
Another problem with the typical vacuum vessel is that, when under uniform load such as by atmospheric pressure, the entire structure is under a compressive load. But as mentioned before, today's super strong materials exhibit their strength in tension not compression. My invention demonstrates a way to place the outside of the vacuum vessel in tension rather than compression. This allows us to take maximum advantage of the strength that today's materials can offer. And this in turn allows us to build a much lighter vacuum vessel for the same displacement. At this point, it is important to note, that as far as I know, and with the exception of my other inventions, (10/342767, 10/383444, and 60/617403), this is the only vacuum vessel ever conceived in which the entire surface of the vessel is in tension rather than compression.
The purpose of this invention is to provide a new structure (from here on called a suspension enclosure) for use underwater and in the air. When used in the air, the invention is a new type of vacuum container (from here on called a vacustat) that has the properties of being lighter than the air it displaces yet being strong enough to stand up to atmospheric pressure. This vacustat will float when evacuated of air and will find enormous use in the airship industry, which is now dependent on helium filled ballonets to provide lift. When used underwater, the invention provides a lightweight flexible hull that can stand up to enormous pressure. This is accomplished by combining the use of super strong, super light materials such as graphite or Kevlar, which exhibit most of their strength in tension, with a structure that places these materials in tension.
This invention defines a new tubular container (The Suspension Enclosure). This said suspension enclosure would be a suitable structure to use as a vehicle framework for use underwater because of its ability to stand up to enormous pressure. In the vacuum vessel configuration, I expect the strength to weigh ratio to be so high, that you could build a vacustat light enough to float in the atmosphere when evacuated of air. The vacustat is very resilient and forgiving of impact and deformation because, suspension enclosures have a remarkable ability to distribute point stresses throughout their entire structure. This gives the vacustat a good chance of surviving impact, wind shear and terrorist attack. The vacustat will pave the way for a new airship/air-crane industry that is no longer dependent on helium for lift. These airships will be less expensive to fly and will be able to control their buoyancy without the need to dump expensive helium in order to sink, or dump ballast in order to rise. But no matter how this suspension enclosure is used, it is sure to be fast, easy, and inexpensive to assemble because there are so few parts, and all parts are extremely easy to manufacture.
This application claims benefit of priority to provisional patent application of the same title filed on Feb. 03, 2004 and assigned U.S. PTO application No. 60/541,292.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60541292 | Feb 2004 | US |