The present invention relates to a lighter-than-air craft for energy-producing turbines. More particularly, the present invention pertains to craft geometries that can provide with a stable flight platform for energy-producing turbines.
Though wind energy is increasingly popular, especially with the threat of global climate change, the cost of energy from wind farms is still not competitive with that of more conventional power sources. Additionally, most of the top-tier wind farm sites have already been taken, forcing new developments to move to less favorable environments which will make the large scale deployment of wind energy all but impossible with current technology.
Windmills in recent years have become more effective and competitive with other energy sources, but most still remain very expensive to install. As a result, their overall cost per installed kilowatt (kW) is still high enough that they are only marginally deployed and contribute only a small amount to the “electrical grid.”
The primary configuration of modern windmills is a horizontally-mounted, large diameter, three-bladed propeller that rotates at low revolutions-per-minute (rpm's) over a very large swept area. The higher the rotational axis of the propeller can be mounted, the better, as the natural speed of the wind increases with an increase in the height above the ground. Conventional windmills thus have very tall and very strong tower structures. Typically, they have a tubular steel tower that is mounted to a deep, subterranean cement base. The system has to be very carefully engineered and sited appropriately for the surrounding terrain. The towers must maintain a central stairway or other means to allow construction and operator access to the upper mechanicals. The tower must accommodate the heavy gearbox, electrical turbine, and propeller assembly, as well as be strong enough to withstand gale force winds, and potentially earthquakes. To make the system even more complicated, the upper nacelle and gearbox/turbine housing must be able to pivot on a vertical axis, so as to align the propeller correctly with the wind direction at any time during the day or night.
On many windmill systems the individual blades of the windmill are able to rotate about their individual longitudinal axis, for pitch control. They can optimize the pitch of the blades depending on the nominal wind speed conditions that are present at anyone time at the site. They can also change the pitch of the blade to “feather” the propeller if the nominal wind speeds are too large. Occasionally the windmill is locked to prevent rotation, and the blades feathered to prevent major damage to the machine in a storm. All of this pitch control technology adds significantly to the cost of windmills.
Another major disadvantage with conventional windmills is damage caused by lightning during thunderstorms. The blades can be upwards of 300 feet in the air and are a good source for lightning to find a conductive path to the ground. Some of the more recently designed windmills use a system of replaceable sacrificial lightning conduction attractors that are built into each windmill propeller blade. They help channel the lightning away from the vulnerable composite structure that comprises the blade itself. The fact remains that one of the major causes of windmill downtime and maintenance costs are caused by lightning damage.
The size of many windmills is also a major problem for inspection, diagnostics, and repair. Often workmen have to use ropes and climbing techniques to perform maintenance on the massive machines. It is very expensive and dangerous. In recent years workmen have fallen to their death trying to repair the blades.
There have been a number of proposals for more efficient and/or cost effective means of harvesting the wind's energy in order to combat the high price of wind energy. There has been considerable effort put into developing diffuser-augmented wind turbines, which have considerably higher power output for a given size rotor than conventional turbines. However, the cost of the diffuser has not justified their commercial implementation.
Some effort has also been made to develop high-altitude wind harvesters, as high-altitude winds are considerably stronger than ground level winds and are present almost everywhere. In one example of this effort, it has been proposed to provide tethered wind turbines that are deployed at or above ground level. See U.S. Published Application 20080048453 to Amick, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
However, no conventional windmill yet addressees the foregoing problems while providing for cost-effective wind-energy production.
The present invention addresses problems encountered in prior art apparatus, and encompasses other features and advantages, through the provision, in an illustrative embodiment, of a lighter-than-air (LTA) craft for an airborne wind-turbine for converting wind energy into another form of energy, the craft being disclosed in an illustrative embodiment as a shroud having a ring-like shape having an airfoil cross-section and defining an interior volume for containing a lighter-than-air (LTA) gas. For the shroud embodiment the shroud includes a central opening oriented along a longitudinal axis of the shroud, and is further configured to produce an asymmetric moment of left and right lateral sections thereof, which asymmetric moment yields a restoring moment that automatically orients the longitudinal axis of the shroud substantially optimally relative to a prevailing wind direction. In addition to the shroud structure other geometries are considered as falling within the scope of the present invention including, inter alia, craft that supports turbines or other mechanisms for converting kinetic wind energy into other useful forms of energy.
In accordance with another feature of the present invention there is provided a wind-based power generating system that includes a wind energy converter for converting wind energy into another form of energy; a lighter-than-air craft configured to produce a neutral or positive net lift to the wind energy converter, the net lift including a net aerodynamic lift and a net buoyant lift; and a tethering system configured to restrain the lighter-than-air craft with respect to the ground. The lighter-than-air craft defines an interior volume for containing a lighter-than-air gas, and the lighter-than-air craft has a fore section and an aft section. The tethering system has at least one attachment point on the fore section of the lighter-than-air craft and at least one attachment point on the aft section of the lighter-than-air craft, and the lighter-than-air craft is constructed and arranged to generate a stable aerodynamic moment with respect to a yaw axis about a center-of-mass of the lighter-than-air craft.
The invention description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like numerals refer to like or corresponding parts throughout the several views, the present invention is generally characterized as a lighter-than-air craft that can be constructed and arranged as a power-augmenting or non-power-augmenting shroud for an airborne wind turbine for converting wind energy into energy (e.g., electrical energy), such as, for instance, an airborne wind-turbine of the type disclosed in above-incorporated U.S. Published Application 20080048453 to Amick.
In the following description reference is made to the use of a lighter-than-air (LTA) shroud. Illustratively,
The shroud 1 is a “lighter-than-air” (LTA) shroud, and is thereby dimensioned to define an internal volume 2 capable of holding a sufficient volume of lighter-than-air gas to provide buoyant lift for overcoming the weight of the airborne components of the wind turbine system comprising the “Lighter-than-air” (LTA) shroud, wind turbine and related components, and tether, and maintaining the wind turbine at heights substantially above ground level where wind speeds are generally higher (see
Referring to
Once airborne, the tethered shroud 1 passively floats downwind of the base station. As wind direction changes, the drag force on the shroud 1, by virtue of its design as explained further herein, causes the shroud 1 to passively change its location with respect to the base station 10, thereby automatically maintaining a down-wind position with respect to the new wind direction.
Tether 11 is secured to shroud 1 at fore F and aft A attachment points so that the shroud's center of pressure is located downwind of the tether's fore F attachment points. Tether 11 is further attached to the shroud 1 at a location so that the aerodynamic forces on the shroud 1 passively restore the minimum radius section thereof to be oriented approximately normal to the direction of airflow. The passive stability and control of shroud 1 can, optionally, be further improved by moving the shroud's center of pressure aft through the employment of aft stabilizers, such as flat winglets or fins (depicted as structures W in
While capable of employment at a variety of scales, it is contemplated that shroud 1 can be dimensioned to accommodate wind turbines with minimum rotor diameters of approximately 5 to 10 meters (e.g. 6 meters), and is highly variable. Likewise, the number and arrangement of rotor blades is also highly variable.
Referring also to
It is contemplated that, optionally, shroud 1 can further comprise additional lift surfaces, such as wings W, disposed on the exterior of shroud 1. Wings or winglets on any of the embodiments herein can extend approximately horizontally from opposing sides of the craft and/or can define a slight acute upward or downward angle (as shown in
Still referring to
The drag force on shroud 1 increases parabolically as the wind speed increases, and this additional force tends to lower the height of the shroud 1. Compensation against this drag force is provided for by an equivalent increase in lift force, and to this end shroud 1 is, in one embodiment, shaped to provide additional lift force through positive net aerodynamic lift produced by utilization of high local lift airfoils proximate the bottom 51 (relative to the base station) of shroud 1 and low local lift airfoils proximate the top 52 (relative to the base station) of shroud 1 (see also
In addition, or alternatively, to the higher coefficient-of-lift airfoil sections at the bottom of shroud 1, the shroud can be configured to operate at a positive angle of attack (αshroud) (
A mechanism can be provided to dynamically control the angle of attack of the shroud (αshroud) to provide lower or higher lift as necessary through, by way of an illustrative example, dynamic lengthening and shortening of the fore F and/or aft A attachment point harness lines. Such a mechanism can, for instance, comprise one or more mechanical winches disposed, for instance, at the juncture 12 where tether 11 comprises the separate lines extending to the fore F and/or aft A attachment points. According to this embodiment, each such winch operates to selectively shorten the length of the associated line extending to one or more of the fore F and/or aft A attachment points. Alternatively, such a mechanism can be provided at or proximate the base station, according to which embodiment it will be appreciated that tether can comprise a plurality of separate lines extending between the base station and each of the fore F and/or aft A attachment points.
Referring to
It will be understood from the foregoing disclosure that the asymmetric moment described above can be tailored to ensure an appropriate response to wind variations by employing airfoils with higher or lower moment coefficient.
While the disclosure heretofore has comprehended a shroud for an airborne wind-turbine, it is contemplated that the inventive shroud can, with only modest modification from the foregoing disclosure, be employed in an underwater environment as part of a water-turbine. According to such an illustrative embodiment, the power-augmenting shroud and associated, enshrouded water turbine can be secured to a suitable base, such as, for instance, a tether or tower, whereby the shroud is permitted to pivot in the water so as to automatically orient itself substantially optimally relative to a prevailing water direction.
As with the embodiment of the shroud described above for employment in a wind-turbine system, the shroud according to this embodiment of the invention is likewise configured to produce rotation about an axis of rotation upstream of the center of pressure and substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the shroud, so as to automatically orient the longitudinal axis of the shroud substantially optimally relative to a prevailing water direction.
Unlike the embodiment of the invention for airborne employment, however, it will be appreciated that the underwater variant is not necessarily filled with a “lighter-than-air” gas, although buoyancy of the shroud (including in combination with any enshrouded turbine components) is required where the shroud is tethered to a base station. This is contrasted with embodiments where the shroud is pivotally connected to a rigid tower secured to the underwater floor or other substrate, in which case buoyancy of the shroud is plainly not required. Further according to such embodiments, it is likewise appreciated that changes on the shroud's angle-of-attack can be effected employing other than fore and aft tether attachment points such as heretofore described.
Lighter-than-Air (LTA) Craft for Support of Wind Converters
Reference is now made to further embodiments of the present invention such as illustrated in
Additional features include a tail or other structure which extends the aerodynamic structures (specifically vertical and horizontal stabilizers or control surfaces) substantially downstream of the rest of the craft; winglets or horizontal stabilizers arranged to improve stability and rotational damping about a pitch axis; a different mechanism for the actuation of the tether system, which is either on the ground and independent for each primary tether, or with an actuator at the tether bridle point which shortens or lengthens the bridle/harness lines to impart a desired rotation position (pitch, roll) to the craft; different forms of the wind energy converter such as a single wind turbine, multiple wind turbines, or an aerovoltaic converter.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Likewise, it is appreciated and expressly contemplated that the dimensions and other geometries/measurements, such as airfoil sectional thicknesses, chord/radius ratio, and others provided as illustrative examples of the above-disclosed embodiment of the airborne variant of the inventive shroud are not necessarily applicable to the underwater embodiment, the dimensions and other measurements of which can be varied according to specific applications.
It should be clear that the various embodiments of an LTA craft and/or LTA shroud provide highly desirable platforms for mounting one or more wind-energy converters (e.g. turbines). These shapes allow for neutral or positive aerodynamic lift, via their aerodynamic geometry for greater stability and overall lift capability. Likewise, these craft effectively locate the wind converters at an elevation where they can operate most effectively, while allowing relatively quick retrieval for service or to avoid severe weather conditions.
The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Features of each of the various embodiments described above can be combined with features of other described embodiments as appropriate in order to provide a multiplicity of feature combinations in associated new embodiments. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments of the apparatus and method of the present invention, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. For example, the buoyant fluid used to inflate the LTA shroud/craft is highly variable, and can include conventional helium, hydrogen mixtures of helium and hydrogen, hot air or another heated gas, or any other fluid that provides buoyancy in relation to the surrounding fluid environment. Likewise, while various embodiments show single or multiple tethers on the fore or aft position of the craft, it is expressly contemplated that the number and placement of tethers and/or bridles is highly variable. Thus, while various embodiments describe multiple tethers on the fore section at discrete/different locations, and a single tether at the aft section, in alternate embodiments, a single tether can be located on a fore section and a plurality of tethers can be located at discrete/different locations on the aft section. Also additional or alternative tethers can be provided at other locations along the craft or connected to certain structures, such as wings or winglets. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/579,839, filed Oct. 15, 2009, entitled POWER-AUGMENTING SHROUD FOR ENERGY-PRODUCING TURBINES, the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, which claims the benefit of Application Ser. No. 61/105,509, filed Oct. 15, 2008, entitled AIRBORNE POWER AUTMENTING SHROUD FOR WIND TURBINES, the entire disclosure of which is also herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1876595 | Beldimano | Sep 1932 | A |
2218867 | Beldimano | Oct 1940 | A |
2431111 | Du Brie | Nov 1947 | A |
4165468 | Fry et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4166596 | Mouton, Jr. et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4207026 | Kushto | Jun 1980 | A |
4309006 | Biscomb | Jan 1982 | A |
4350896 | Benoit | Sep 1982 | A |
4350897 | Benoit | Sep 1982 | A |
4350898 | Benoit | Sep 1982 | A |
4350899 | Benoit | Sep 1982 | A |
4398865 | Garkusha et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4450364 | Benoit | May 1984 | A |
4470563 | Engelsman | Sep 1984 | A |
4789302 | Gruzling | Dec 1988 | A |
4832571 | Carrol | May 1989 | A |
5836738 | Finney | Nov 1998 | A |
6382904 | Orlov et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
7129596 | Macedo | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7287723 | Barnes | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7317261 | Rolt | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335000 | Ferguson | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7552894 | Barnes | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7582981 | Meller | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7602077 | Ferguson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7709973 | Meller | May 2010 | B2 |
7723861 | Meller | May 2010 | B2 |
7775483 | Olson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775761 | Ferguson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786610 | Potter | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7821149 | Meller | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7859126 | Ferguson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7938364 | Tillotson | May 2011 | B2 |
8109711 | Blumer et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8148838 | Ferguson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8247912 | Da Costa Duarte Pardal et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8541897 | Khoshnevis | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8678309 | Heppe | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8864064 | DiMarzio et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20060251505 | Ferguson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070012819 | Barnes | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013196 | Chen | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070176432 | Rolt | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080048453 | Amick | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080169376 | Barnes | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181773 | Ferguson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080296905 | Ferguson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090278353 | Da Costa Duarte Pardal et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090302149 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013226 | Blumer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026007 | Bevirt | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032947 | Bevirt | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032949 | Varrichio et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032956 | Varrichio et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032963 | Ferguson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100066093 | Meller | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100066095 | Meller | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100068052 | Werle et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100090473 | Glass | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117363 | Meller | May 2010 | A1 |
20100133385 | Olson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100140390 | Goodall | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100232988 | Creighton et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100259050 | Meller | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110101692 | Bilaniuk | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109097 | Ferguson | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121578 | Ferguson | May 2011 | A1 |
20110192938 | DiMarzio et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120235410 | Serrano | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120312918 | Heppe | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130037650 | Heppe | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130115544 | Davidson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130118173 | Cardoso | May 2013 | A1 |
20140001308 | Costa Duarte Pardal et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140227092 | Wood | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246862 | Garcia-Sanz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0045202 | Feb 1982 | EP |
0935068 | Aug 1999 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120319407 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61105509 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12579839 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 13565916 | US |