A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the reproduction of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
This application claims benefit of the following patent application(s) which is/are hereby incorporated by reference: None
The present invention relates generally to gas discharge lighting ballasts for powering multiple lamps in parallel. More particularly, the present invention relates to a lamp ballast topology and associated method to match multiple independent resonant tanks for parallel lamp operation.
An electronic ballast with multiple parallel independent lamp operation is generally desirable so that if one lamp fails the remaining lamps will still be functional. This feature allows for significantly reduced maintenance costs because there is correspondingly no need to replace the failed lamp immediately if such replacement is inconvenient or impractical under the circumstances.
One convention ballast topology that provides multiple parallel independent lamp operation is to use multiple independent resonant tanks, as in the circuit 110 shown in
Referring to
For series resonant tanks, the lamp current (I_lamp) is dependent on the resonant circuit quality factor (Q) and operating frequency (f). Represented in
A conventional lamp current balancing method as represented in
V2=V—c2+V_lamp2+V—T1B;
V1=V—c1+V_lamp1+V—T1A;
In the above equations, V1 and V2 are the voltages across the resonant inductors L_res1 and L_res2, respectively. If the lamp currents are balanced to be the same by the transformer T1, then:
V—c1=V—c2;
V_lamp1=V_lamp2; and
V2−V1=V—T1B−V—T1A
Because the voltages V_T1B and V_T1A are different by 180 degrees due to the transformer design,
V2−V1=2*(V—T1A)
As demonstrated herein, a large voltage difference will therefore be seen across the resonant inductors L_res1 and L_res2. The large voltage difference will further cause a large current difference through the resonant inductors. This current differential makes design of the resonant inductors exceedingly difficult because the current could be almost any value depending on the voltage across the transformer T1. This feature also makes the ballast thermal design very difficult, as the increased current results in a measurably increased temperature for the inductor as well.
If the Q or output characteristic of the two resonant tanks are sufficiently close, the lamp currents I_lamp1 and I_lamp2, respectively, would also be very close so that the voltage across the transformer T1 would correspondingly be quite small. As a result the current imbalance for the respective resonant inductors would be substantially reduced.
In practice, the resonant capacitors typically have very low variation (e.g., 1-3%). The inductance of the resonant inductor may however vary across a typical range of about 5-10%. Therefore, balancing of the inductor current or resonant inductance is an important consideration for balancing of the lamp currents and thereby solving the thermal imbalance for resonant inductors.
A resonant tank topology and associated methods are herein provided in accordance with the present invention to match multiple independent resonant tanks in a lamp ballast for parallel lamp operation.
In another aspect of the present invention, a resonant current and lamp current balancing method is provided for multiple independent resonant tanks.
In another aspect, a method is provided for disabling associated balancing transformer windings in multiple resonant tanks.
In a particular embodiment of the present invention, a lighting ballast and associated methods are provided to balance current through resonant inductors that have inductance variation, and further effective to balance lamp currents in the range from full brightness to full dimming. The ballast includes a lighting power source, one or more balancing transformers having a plurality of windings, a first resonant tank circuit having one or more transformer windings and a second resonant tank circuit having a like number of transformer windings. Each of the windings for the first resonant tank are reversed in direction in association with a corresponding winding for the second resonant tank, such that the only current passing through the windings is a current difference between the two windings.
In another embodiment, a lighting ballast in accordance with the present invention includes a lighting power source, a balancing transformer with a plurality of windings, a first resonant tank circuit having a plurality of the transformer windings and a second resonant tank circuit having at least as many of said transformer windings as are present in the first tank circuit. Each of the windings for the first resonant tank is reversed in direction in association with a corresponding winding for the second resonant tank.
In another embodiment, a lighting ballast in accordance with the present invention includes a lighting power source, first and second balancing transformers each having a plurality of windings, a first resonant tank circuit having one or more windings from each of the first and second transformers, and a second resonant tank circuit having one or more windings from each of the first and second transformers. Each of the windings for the first resonant tank is reversed in direction in association with a corresponding winding for the second resonant tank.
In various embodiments, the lighting ballast may further include a transformer disabling control circuit with one or more switching elements and transformer windings coupled to a large capacitor. Operation of the switching elements either causes the balancing transformer to operate normally or to effectively short, wherein one or more of the resonant tanks are disabled. In this manner the ballast may properly operate with fewer lamps than available resonant tanks.
Throughout the specification and claims, the following terms take at least the meanings explicitly associated herein, unless the context dictates otherwise. The meanings identified below do not necessarily limit the terms, but merely provide illustrative examples for the terms. The meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” may include plural references, and the meaning of “in” may include “in” and “on.” The phrase “in one embodiment,” as used herein does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, although it may.
The term “coupled” means at least either a direct electrical connection between the connected items or an indirect connection through one or more passive or active intermediary devices. The term “circuit” means at least either a single component or a multiplicity of components, either active and/or passive, that are coupled together to provide a desired function. The term “signal” as used herein may include any meanings as may be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, including at least one current, voltage, charge, temperature, data or a state of one or more memory locations as expressed on one or more transmission mediums.
The terms “switching element” and “switch” may be used interchangeably and may refer herein to at least: a variety of transistors as known in the art (including but not limited to FET, BJT, IGBT, JFET, etc.), a switching diode, a silicon controlled rectifier (SCR), a diode for alternating current (DIAC), a triode for alternating current (TRIAC), a mechanical single pole/double pole switch (SPDT), or electrical, solid state or reed relays. Where either a field effect transistor (FET) or a bipolar junction transistor (BJT) may be employed as an embodiment of a transistor, the scope of the terms “gate,” “drain,” and “source” includes “base,” “collector,” and “emitter,” respectively, and vice-versa.
Terms such as “providing,” “processing,” “supplying,” “determining,” “calculating” or the like may refer at least to an action of a computer system, computer program, signal processor, logic or alternative analog or digital electronic device that may be transformative of signals represented as physical quantities, whether automatically or manually initiated.
Referring generally to
Referring first to an exemplary embodiment as represented in
A balancing transformer T1 is provided to substantially match the two independent resonant tanks 12a, 12b. The first resonant tank 12a includes transformer windings T1_B1, T1_B2, T1_B3 which are each coupled on a first end to a common node and further coupled on a second end to the resonant inductor L_res1, the first lamp connection terminal 16a for the first tank, and the resonant capacitor C_res1, respectively. The second resonant tank 12b includes transformer windings T1_A1, T1_A2, T1_A3 which are each coupled on a first end to a common node and further coupled on a second end to the resonant inductor L_res2, the first lamp connection terminal 16a for the second tank, and the resonant capacitor C_res2, respectively.
In various embodiments, each of the windings for the first resonant tank 12a is reversed in direction in association with a corresponding winding for the second resonant tank 12b. The only current flowing through any corresponding set of windings may therefore be defined as a current differential between that set of windings.
As represented in
When there is only one lamp coupled to the lamp connection terminals of one of the resonant tanks 12a, 12b, due, for example, to end-of-life failure or other like reasons, the switching elements S1 or S2 coupled to the resonant tank associated with the failed lamp may be opened to disable the tank. The switching element may be driven to turn on and off by, for example, a controller which is effective to determine an end-of-life failure or an open circuit across the associated lamp connection terminals and to control the switch state accordingly. Such processes are known in the art and further description may accordingly be omitted herein.
However, in an embodiment of the present invention, a resonant tank disabling control circuit 14 may be provided to disable the balancing transformer T1 during such conditions and facilitate proper single-lamp operation for the ballast 10. Referring to
When the switching element S3 is driven to be in a first switch state (e.g., open), the balancing transformer T1 is allowed to function normally. However, when the switching element S3 is driven to be in a second switch state (e.g., closed), the transformer winding T1_C is shorted with the capacitor C3 so that the voltage across the winding T1_C is limited to a value defined by the capacitance of the capacitor C3 and the turns ratio N between the transformer windings T1_C and T1_A. If the capacitance of the capacitor C3 is sufficiently large, the voltage drop across the capacitor C3 will be small enough that the transformer T1 is substantially shorted when the switching element S3 is closed.
In embodiments of the present invention as described above and more particularly with reference to
Referring first to an embodiment as represented in
A first winding T2_A from the second transformer T2 is coupled between the resonant inductor L_res1 of the first tank 12a and a node between the resonant capacitor C_res1 and the capacitor C1. A second winding T2_B from the second transformer T2 is coupled between the resonant inductor L_res2 of the second tank 12b and a node between the resonant capacitor C_res2 and the capacitor C2. The first and second windings T2_A, T2_B from the second transformer T2 may be magnetically coupled to each other but reversed in direction with respect to each other as shown in
Referring further to
The control circuit is effective (in similar manner to the control circuit represented in
The previous detailed description has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. Thus, although there have been described particular embodiments of the present invention of a new and useful “Lighting Ballast and Method for Balancing Multiple Independent Resonant Tanks,” it is not intended that such references be construed as limitations upon the scope of this invention except as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4574222 | Anderson | Mar 1986 | A |
6118223 | Canova | Sep 2000 | A |
6472876 | Notohamiprodjo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7271549 | Wey et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7285921 | Chen | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291987 | Chang et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20070182343 | Kwon | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100045200 | Wey et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61473581 | Apr 2011 | US |