Patent Grant
12000563
This application is the U.S. National Phase application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2020/075335, filed on Sep. 10, 2020, which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 19197651.3, filed on Sep. 17, 2019. These applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The invention relates to a lighting system and an artificial window.
Artificial skylight devices are a relatively new class of devices drawing a lot of attention lately. Their aim is to provide human beings with a sense of being connected to nature whilst indoor where they may be fully or partially deprived from access to natural light. Examples of such indoor spaces are offices, corridors, subways, underground metro and train-stations, tunnels, hospitality areas, hospitals, planes, submarines, etc. etc. At present there exist many different artificial skylights ranging from (very) low-end, low-cost and static (backlit) posters to the more expensive, high-res dynamic TV and/or projector based devices towards the (almost) unpractical, unaffordable, huge size and weight, high-volumetric, high-tech devices, deploying wavelength-dependent nano-particle scattering, known as Rayleigh scattering (the reason for which the sky is blue). A relatively simple and low-cost artificial skylight device is known from U.S. Pat. No. 9,488,327 B2. This device consists of a recessed panel acting as a diffuse light source representing the blue sky, and a set of one or more side walls, comprising triangular shaped portions that can be backlit, thereby mimicking a sun struck portion whilst simultaneously providing a visual cue towards the position of a distant sun in the sky. However, this known artificial skylight device has the disadvantage that it provides only a moderate realistic sensation of a real window or skylight.
It is an object of the invention to counteract the disadvantage of the known artificial skylight device. Thereto the invention proposes a lighting system comprising a light area extending transverse to a main, axial direction, and
In the context of this invention the expression “essentially” it be understood as almost completely or completely and the following should be considered that, for example, parts of the inner surface of the second wall portion of the side wall by which it already screened from said direct view, for example by parts to which said second wall portion of the side wall is attached to other parts, are not necessarily screened by the first wall portion. Furthermore, it is evident that screening of the second wall portion relates to an inner surface of the second wall portion, i.e. the side of the second wall portion that faces toward the transparent pane.
It was found that the lack of realistic sensation/effect is caused a.o. by reflections of the backlit sidewalls which appear as blurred and smeared-out portions at the diffuse surface of the recessed panel. The issue with these blurred and smeared-out reflections is that the sky portion now appears as a surface having differently colored portions, which are visible along two or more sides of the recessed panel. Consequently, the human eye is enabled to focus at the plane of origin of the color difference, being the panel's surface/light area, thereby significantly reducing the sensation of depth. Moreover, the negative impact of the reflections can be so strong, for example when the whole circumferential first wall portion is lit/backlit, that a clearly visible circle of different color arises in the center of the light area (“sky”), which further reduce the sense of depth. Then, also the overall illusion of the artificial skylight is compromised, whilst a reference to the position of the sun in the sky has vanished, as there is no more sharp shadow. Various options are envisaged to overcome these issues, yet most options having a specific other drawback. For example, one option to reduce the negative impact of the backlit sidewall is to decrease their visibility by decreasing the light intensity of the backlight portions. However, at that point the intensity of the artificial “sun” becomes so weak that the realistic illusion collapses. Another option is to increase the vertical distance between the first wall portion and the recessed light area, for example in deploying a more forgiving sky configuration such as an indirect lit (half) dome, ellipse, sphere, tubular cavity of any other integrating body (acting as the sky). Yet, this goes at the expense of a significant increasing in the total build-in depth of the device, in particular for the devices having a large sky area. Yet another option is to tilt the sidewalls outwards, such that hardly any light is directed towards the light area (sky portion), as implemented by Mitsubishi and COELUX having slanted sidewalls.
The lighting system may have the feature that the light area is formed by a LED panel having a diffuse surface thus improving the effect of infinity. Such a LED panel may be LEDs mounted on a carrier combined with a separate diffuser or with an integral diffuser. Said diffuser comprises said diffuse surface and is arranged in between the carrier and the transparent pane. Said separate diffuser might be spaced from said carrier, but alternatively may be arranged on the surface of said carrier. Yet, the diffuser is arranged in between the array of LEDs and the transparent pane for diffusing the light issued by the LEDs during operation.
The approach of the current invention disclosure is to prevent that the reflections of the sidewalls become blurred. This is achieved in deploying a clear and transparent window in between the recessed panel and the one or more (backlit) side walls. Furthermore, upstream of the pane, a second wall portion and a homogenous diffuse lit surface, such as a very diffuse and homogenous lit sky-blue recessed LED panel, are provided with a viewing angle limiting frame height of the first wall portion being large enough to restrict a direct line of view through the light exit window at the second wall portion and the frame of the sky-panel, such that there are no witnesses to the origin of the sky whilst simultaneously providing the feeling of sufficient structural integrity of a (suspended) ceiling. It appeared that the second wall portion should not be visible through the transparent pane as this reduces the realistic effect of the artificial window.
The benefits of such a clear pane or sheet of material, for example made of PC, PMMA or (window) glass, is that:
The positive impact of having an intermediate pane of a clear material in between the light area and the first wall portion is that as a first visual cue, clear and sharp reflection of the “sun struck” inner first wall portion is clearly visible, and in symmetric proportions, at both sides of the clear glass pane. Further, and as a second visual cue, both the real and reflected image of the shadow portions provide clear guidance towards the position of the virtual sun in the sky, without the need to see the sun. Furthermore, and as a third cue, the glass pane also shows reflections (virtual images) of other objects in the space below the canopy, appearing as augmented images in the sky, in a plane of focus beyond the surface of the glass pane. The second wall portion being screened by the first wall portion from a direct line of view through the light exit window counteracts the potential, unrealistic disturbance of the reflections (virtual images) by the visibility of the second wall portion. Hence, together, with the blue sky being uniform in appearance, and as there are no indicators that provide a measure for the “distance” towards the sky, the depth of the blue sky light area is felt as infinite.
Typically the side wall is dimensioned such that it can be considered an extension in the axial direction of the perimeter of the light area, in other words the side wall can be considered a wall around the light area, which is extended in a downstream, axial direction. Typically the transparent pane is essentially non-diffusing and non-scattering and positioned directly opposite the light area, i.e. there is no separate pane, sheet or plate in between the light area and the transparent pane and substantially all light from the light area directly impinges on the transparent pane.
The lighting system could have the feature that the transparent pane is specular Fresnel reflective. The Fresnel reflection of the clear, transparent being specular further enhances the sense of depth because of the sharpened reflection image and thus improves the suggestion of a realistic window. Typically, the lighting system can have the feature that the transparent pane extends over the full cross sectional area Ra of the recess at the first wall portion to further enhance the desired realism of the artificial skylight solution.
The lighting system could have the feature that the first wall portion is capable of emitting light. Thereto the light area, either is a light transmitting area such as a side-lit light guide, or is a light generating area (and can also be referred to in the description as a light generating area), such as backlit area or OLED, could comprise a light source. The use of lighting on the side walls helps to increase the realism of the lighting system. The light source is then intended to replicate natural daylight, or even natural lighting from the moon or stars. When the light area and first wall portion are being lit in the right proportions/ratios, the artificial sky comes with an even improved, strong feel of depth, with the depth extending far beyond the surface of the clear, transparent pane. Further, some of the light originating from the backlit sidewalls preferably reach the opposing non-lit sidewall surfaces, in order to “neutralize” the bluish appearance of those sidewalls as results from the blue-sky engine. In this way, the illuminated side wall or side walls compensate for the incident blue light from the artificial skylight, so the walls of the recess appear white (or any other color/color temperature of the sunlight that is desired) to an observer. Apart from the color issue, bright recess walls enhance the realism of the sunlight effect. The lighting system can be used as or comprised in an artificial window in a ceiling, but it can also be used as or comprised in an artificial vertical window in a wall.
The lighting system can have the feature that the sidewall, the first and second wall portion thereof are circumferential around the recess and wherein the first wall portion is provided with a lighting arrangement for controlling at least one of color, intensity, contrast of the illumination, and shape from which light is provided by at least (a part of) one sub-wall of the first wall portion. Then the lighting system has a circumferential side wall of which the first wall portion comprises a set of side sub-walls, wherein each side sub-wall comprises a rectangular light emitting area. This defines a basic recess for a polygonal panel.
In a first example, again with a set of side walls, each side wall can comprise a rectangular light emitting area formed from two independently controllable triangular light emitting areas. With one triangle illuminated, an effect of a sharp boundary can be created, which can replicate the sharp lines created by a distant point light source such as the sun. In this way, a triangular illumination shape can appear to have been created by a sunlit light transmitting or generating area. If both triangles are illuminated, the side wall can appear to face the sun, whereas if one is illuminated the side wall can appear to be laterally disposed with respect to the sun. If neither triangle is illuminated, the side wall can appear to be in the shade.
In another example, again with a set of side walls, each side wall can comprise a rectangular light emitting area formed from four independently controllable triangular light emitting areas, each having an apex at the center of the rectangular area. This means that triangles can be defined with opposite slopes. This means the lighting system does not need to be oriented in any particular way in order for the shadows created by the sun to be replicated.
In another example, again with a set of side walls, two side walls can each comprise a rectangular light emitting area formed from a plurality of independently controllable triangular light emitting areas, each having an apex at one corner of the rectangular area. This means that triangles can be defined with varying slopes. This means the lighting system can replicate the lines cast by the sun at different heights in the sky representing different times of day. There can be four side walls, wherein the two side walls (with the multiple triangles) face each other, and the other two side walls are provided with a plurality of rectangular light emitting areas. The laterally disposed side walls (with respect to the direction of incoming light from the sun) have the triangles, whereas the front and back walls have the rectangles. This means all four side walls can be controlled to provide an overall impression matching sun illumination from a particular sun position. The light transmitting or light generating area typically comprises a rectangle or square, but other shapes are possible.
The light source can provide a first color for light emitted in a normal direction with respect to the light generating area, and a second, different, color for light emitted in a direction offset from the normal direction. For example, the second color can have a greater blue component than the first color. This arrangement functions as an artificial skylight, i.e. a system which provides an appearance aiming to replicate the appearance of a ceiling window when illuminated by daylight (either direct sunlight or general light for example as would be seen during a cloudy day). This arrangement provides whiter downward task light, representing the sun, and bluer light in other directions, representing the sky during daylight hours. The side wall illumination can prevent the side walls appearing blue, which does not match the effect observed through a real window.
As explained above, even further desired realism can be obtained by forming a sharply demarcated light/dark boundary. These measures can be used to greatly enhance the realism of the artificial skylight solution.
5/6/7/14. In a first configuration, the lighting system can have the feature that the first wall portion has a height H1 which comprises a transverse wall portion extending at the transparent pane in a radial direction over a width Wt into the recess having a width Wr for screening the second wall portion having a height H2 from said direct line of view, wherein
H2<=H1*Wt/(Wr−Wt).
Alternatively, in a second configuration, the lighting system can have the feature that the first wall portion has a height H1 which is offset from the second wall portion by a distance D in a radial direction into the recess having a width Wr for screening the second wall portion with a height H2 from said direct line of view, wherein
H2<=H1*D/(Wr−2*D).
In both the first and second configuration it is thus ensured that the second wall portion is not visible through the light exit window and hence that the desired realism of the artificial skylight is not negatively affected. In practice the height H2 of the second wall portion could be practically zero, but typically is more than zero. The second wall portion is that portion of the side wall which is in between the light area and the transparent pane and forms a very small space between the light area and the transparent pane. Yet, preferably the second wall portion has a small height H2 and the light area and the transparent pane are spaced apart by a distance H2 in the range of 0.1-7.5 cm, preferably 0.5-5 cm, most preferably 0.5-1.5 cm. In practice it appeared that 7.5 cm is the upper limit of the height H2 as otherwise the size of the cross sectional area Ra of the recess at the first wall portion becomes too small and/or the height H1 of the first wall portion becomes too large resulting in a too high built-in depth of the lighting system. Hence, from this point of view, height H2 should be as small as possible and that a preferred upper limit for H2 is 5 cm. On the other hand, height H2 should be large enough to avoid optical contact between the light area and the transparent pane, so at least 0.1 cm, but rather it preferably is large enough to house an object for further enhancement of the realism of the artificial skylight solution. Hence, H2 preferably is in the range of 0.5 cm to 1.5 cm. To house an object for said further enhancement of the realism, the lighting system can have the feature that at least one object chosen from a handlebar, a stain and an artificial drop of birds-po, tree leaves, rain drops, and/or sand grains, is to sit at the clear pane, or to sit within a space between the light area and the clear transparent pane.
The lighting system can have the feature that the transparent pane is made of clear, colorless glass, PMMA or PC. These materials are typically used and convenient for use as window panes and resemble a real window glass pane as much as possible and thus enhance the desired realism of the artificial skylight solution.
The lighting system can have the feature that the second wall portion has a white colored, diffuse reflective surface facing the recess. It appeared that such a configuration of the second wall portion the effect of the second wall portion on the desired realism of the artificial skylight solution is improved compared to other configurations of the second side wall. Also in the case the second wall portion is unintentionally not fully screened from a direct line of view through the light exit window, the desired realism of the artificial skylight solution is satisfactorily maintained.
The lighting system can have the feature that the first wall portion has a white colored, diffuse reflective surface facing the recess. Thus the visibility of the reflection of (virtual images) of the first wall portion in the clear transparent pane appearing as augmented images in the sky is enhanced, and hence the desired realism of the artificial skylight solution is enhanced.
The first wall portion can emit white and/or colored light for example with a Lambertian intensity distribution. Yet, the lighting system can have the feature that the light area emits light with a color temperature or color correlated color temperature in the range of 6500-20000K, comprising both overcast sky and clear blue sky color temperatures, preferably in the range of 9000-15000K relating to clear blue sky color temperatures. Additionally or alternatively, the lighting system can have the feature that the first wall portion emits light with a color temperature or color correlated color temperature in the range of 3500-6000K, preferably in the range of 4000-5500K. In either of these solutions, the appearance of the side wall can be made to match the lighting effect being desired from the light area.
Use of the lighting system according to the invention as an artificial window or a recessed wall arrangement. In particular indoor spaces such as offices, corridors, subways, underground metro and train-stations, tunnels, hospitality areas, hospitals, planes, submarines, where there is fully or partially absence of natural light, are suitable application areas for the lighting system according to the invention.
The invention will now be further explained by means of the schematic drawings which are intended to elucidate the invention rather than to limit the scope of the invention, thereto some dimensions may not be up to scale but may be exaggerated for explanation purposes. In the drawings:
H2<=H1*D/(Wr−2*D).
H2<=H1*Wt/(Wr−Wt).
Finally, the following is noted:
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19197651 | Sep 2019 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2020/075335 | 9/10/2020 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2021/052858 | 3/25/2021 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9488327 | Van Gheluwe et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 20130307420 | Yoder et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20180246270 | Di Trapani | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180252374 | Keller | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20190159317 | Harada | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190295519 | Krass | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190360661 | Di Trapani | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20220196904 | Fujii | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| 20220243892 | Xiang | Aug 2022 | A1 |
| 20220357017 | Molteni | Nov 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 9014782 | Dec 1990 | WO |
| 2006129268 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2014191250 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2018157903 | Sep 2018 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220341552 A1 | Oct 2022 | US |
