Lighting system with power factor correction control data determined from a phase modulated signal

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8174204
  • Patent Number
    8,174,204
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 12, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 8, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes a power factor correction (PFC) controller that determines at least one power factor correction control parameter from phase delays of a phase modulated signal. In at least one embodiment, a peak voltage of the phase modulated signal is a PFC control parameter used bit the PFC controller to control power factor correction and generation of a link voltage by a PFC LED driver circuit. The phase delays are related to a peak voltage of the phase modulated signal. Thus, in at least one embodiment, detecting the phase delay in one or more cycles of the phase modulated signal allows the PFC controller to determine the peak voltage of the phase modulated signal.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates in general to the field of electronics and lighting, and more specifically to a system and method to determine power factor correction control parameters from phase delays in a phase modulated signal.


2. Description of the Related Art


Commercially practical incandescent light bulbs have been available for over 100 years. However, other light sources show promise as commercially viable alternatives to the incandescent light bulb. LEDs are becoming particularly attractive as main stream light sources in part because of energy savings through high efficiency light output and environmental incentives such as the reduction of mercury.


LEDs are semiconductor devices and are driven by direct current. The lumen output intensity (i.e. brightness) of the LED approximately varies in direct proportion to the current flowing through the LED. Thus, increasing current supplied to an LED increases the intensity of the LED and decreasing current supplied to the LED dims the LED. Current can be modified by either directly reducing the direct current level to the white LEDs or by reducing the average current through duty cycle modulation.


Dimming a light source saves energy when operating a light source and also allows a user to adjust the intensity of the light source to a desired level. Many facilities, such as homes and buildings, include light source dimming circuits (referred to herein as “dimmers”).



FIG. 1 depicts a lighting system 100 that generates a link voltage VLINK and a drive current iOUT to illuminate the light source 102. An alternating current (AC) voltage source 101 such as a power plant generates a mains voltage Vmains, which provides power for lighting system 100. The particular frequency and root mean square (RMS) value of mains voltage Vmains is generally location specific and is nominally 60 Hz/120 VAC in the United States and 50 Hz/230 VAC in Europe and elsewhere. The lighting system 100 includes a dimmer 104 to generate a raw phase modulated signal VΦRAW. Rectifier 105 rectifies the raw phase modulated signal VΦRAW to generate a rectified phase modulated signal VΦ. Rectifier 105 is, for example, a full-bridge diode rectifier. The phase delay of each cycle of the phase modulated signal VΦ indicates a particular dimming level. Dimmer 104 can be any conventional dimmer that generates a phase modulated signal, such as a triac based dimmer as described in Melanson I.


The lighting system 100 also includes a light source driver circuit 106 to receive the phase modulated signal VΦ. In at least one embodiment, light source driver circuit 106 is a switching power converter with an internal PFC switch (not shown) that controls power factor correction and boosting phase modulated signal VΦ to the link voltage VLINK. The light source driver circuit 106 modulates the light source drive current iOUT in response to the dimming level indicated by phase modulated signal VΦ. The light source driver circuit 106 modulates the light source drive current iOUT by turning the light source drive current iOUT “on” and “off” to achieve an average value of light source drive current iOUT corresponding to the dimming level indicated bad phase modulated signal VΦ. The drive current iOUT causes the light source 102 to illuminate, and modulating the drive current iOUT varies the brightness of light source 102. Thus, light source driver circuit 106 attempts to modulate the drive current iOUT so that light source 102 dims to a level indicated by phase modulated signal VΦ.


For an LED based light source 102, the link voltage VLINK can be 400 V or more. To dim light source 102, light source driver circuit 106 decreases the duty cycle of control signal CS and, thus, decreases the drive current iOUT. When dimmed, the power demand of light source 102 decreases. When the power demand of light source 102 decreases, light source driver circuit 106 decreases the duty cycle of the internal switch (not shown) that controls the voltage boost of phase modulated signal VΦ to link voltage VLINK. Despite decreasing power demand, light source driver circuit 106 maintains the link voltage VLINK at an approximately constant level. The switching efficiency of light source driver circuit 106 steadily decreases as 106 continues to boost the link voltage VLINK to a voltage used during full power demand by light source 102 despite the lower power demands of a dimmed light source 102. The efficiency loss becomes more prominent, for example, when a duty cycle of the internal PFC switch of light source driver circuit 106 is less than 50%.


Decreasing power demand by light source 102 when dimming light source 102 can actually increase power demand by light source driver circuit 106. Light source driver circuit 106 attempts to provide unity power factor correction so that the light source driver circuit 106 appears resistive to the AC voltage source 101. Thus, looking into terminals A and B, ideally light source driver circuit 106 has an effective resistance REFF0 as perceived by the AC voltage source 101. The value of the effective resistance REFF0 equals VΦ/iIN, where VΦ is a phase modulated signal and iIN is the input current into light source driver circuit 106. As the power demand by light source 102 decreases when dimmed, the current iIN actually increases, thus, decreasing the effective resistance REFF0, thus, drawing more power from AC voltage source 101. Decreasing the effective resistance REFF0 of light source driver circuit 106 when dimming light source 102 represents an inefficient use of power.



FIG. 2A depicts a series of voltage waveforms 200 that represent two respective cycles of waveforms present in lighting system 100. Supply voltage Vmains is a sine wave depicted with two exemplary cycles 202 and 204. Dimmer 104 generates a raw phase modulated signal VΦ by chopping each half cycle of supply voltage Vmains to generate identical leading edge phase delay α1 for each respective half cycle of cycle 206. The phase delays of the raw phase modulated signal VΦ increase as the dimming level decreases, i.e. the brightness of light source 102 decreases. Half cycle 208 indicates longer phase delays α2 corresponding to a decrease in dimming level. The leading edge phase delays αX represent the elapsed time between a beginning of a half cycle and a leading edge of the phase modulated mains voltage VΦ, where X is an index value. The rectified cycles 210 and 212 of phase modulated signal VΦ have the same respective phase delays α1 and α2 as the raw phase modulated signal VΦ RAW.


Conventional dimmers, such as a triac based dimmer, that are designed for use with inactive loads, such as incandescent light bulbs, often do not perform well when supplying a raw phase modulated signal VΦRAW to an active load such as light source driver circuit 106. For example, when supplying an active load, the dimmer can miss generating phase delays in some cycles of raw phase modulated signal VΦRAW and can generate ripple during the phase delays. Exemplary problems with at least one conventional dimmer when used with an active load are described in Rand et al., “Issues, Models and Solutions for Triac Modulated Phase Dimming of LED Lamps”, June, 2007, pages 1398-1404 of Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2007. PESC 2007, published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, ISBN 978-1-4244-0655-5.



FIG. 2B depicts an LED driver circuit 250 available from Supertex, Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif., USA. LED driver circuit 250, represents one embodiment of light source driver circuit 106. The LED driver circuit 250 is described in more detail in Supertex design note DN-H05 available from Supertex, Inc. The LED driver circuit 250 includes two extra circuits, damper circuit 252 and bleeder circuit 254 to provide compatibility with a dimmer, such as dimmer 104. According to DN-H05, the damper circuit 252 provides damped charging of the driver's input filter circuit at P16. The damper circuit 252 provides resistive damping to prevent AC line input current oscillations due to a sudden rise of an AC line voltage, such as the edges of phase modulated signal VΦ. The bleeder circuit 254 provides a nominal 1 kohm load to a rectified AC line at P21 to suppress a voltage rise at the input capacitors C21-C23 during phase delays of phase modulated signal VΦ which could otherwise cause flicker of a lamp driven bid LED driver circuit 250.



FIG. 2C depicts a unity power factor LED lamp driver 280, which represents one embodiment of light source driver circuit 106. The LED lamp driver 280 is described in more detail with reference to FIG. 9 in Supertex application note AN-H52 available from Supertex, Inc. LED lamp driver 280 includes damping circuitry 282 to add a load to dimmer 104 during phase delays of phase modulated signal. The damping circuitry 282 includes a bleeder resistor RBL that is connected by transistor M2 during phase delays of a phase modulated input signal to lamp driver 280. When transistor M2 conducts, the bleeder resistor RBL provides an added load to the AC line at VIN to dampen the phase modulated signal during phase delays. Adding an extra transistor M2 and resistor RBL increases the system cost of lamp driver 280.


The light source driver circuit 106 exhibits one or more inefficiencies when dimming light source 102. For example, when the power demand by light source 102 decreases, the link voltage remains approximately constant. Additionally, when power demand by light source 102 decreases, the effective resistance REFF0 of light source driver circuit 106 increases, thus drawing more power from AC voltage source 101 despite the lower power demands by light source 102. Additionally, added circuitry to conventional LED driver circuits adds cost to the LED driver circuits.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment of the present invention, a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes a power factor correction (PFC) controller. The controller includes an input to receive a phase delay signal indicating a phase delay of a phase modulated dimmer signal. The controller also includes a digital signal processor, coupled to the input, to receive the phase delay signal and determine a PFC control operating parameter from the phase delay signal and to generate a PFC switch control signal using the determined operating parameter.


In another embodiment of the present invention, a method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes receiving a phase delay signal indicating a phase delay of a phase modulated dimmer signal, determining a PFC control operating parameter from the phase delay signal using a digital signal processor, and generating a PFC switch control signal using the determined operating parameter.


In a further embodiment of the present invention, a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes a power factor correction (PFC) controller to receive a signal indicating a dimming level and to generate a PFC switch control signal to cause a PFC LED driver circuit to respond to the dimming level indicated by the signal without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC load driver circuit, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC load driver circuit, as the dimming level indicated by the signal increases.


In a further embodiment of the present invention, a method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes receiving a signal indicating a dimming level and generating a power factor correction control signal to cause a PFC LED driver circuit to respond to the dimming level indicated by the signal without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC load driver circuit, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC load driver circuit, as the dimming level indicated by the signal increases.


In a further embodiment of the present invention, a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes a power factor correction (PFC) controller to generate a duty cycle modulated control signal to control a regulated link voltage of a PFC LED driver circuit and to decrease the link voltage when a duty cycle of the control signal decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value.


In a further embodiment of the present invention, a method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes generating a duty cycle modulated control signal to control a regulated link voltage of a PFC LED driver circuit; and decreasing the link voltage when a duty cycle of the control signal decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value.


In a further embodiment of the present invention, a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes a power factor correction (PFC) controller includes: an input to receive a phase delay signal indicating a phase delay of a phase modulated dimmer signal. The PFC controller is configured to receive the phase delay signal and to generate pulses for the PFC switch control signal during the phase delays of the phase modulated signal. The pulse widths and duty cycles of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays are sufficient to attenuate ripple of the phase modulated signal during the phase delays of phase modulated signal.


In a further embodiment of the present invention, a method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes receiving a phase delay signal indicating a phase delays of a phase modulated dimmer signal and generating pulses for a PFC switch control signal during the phase delays of the phase modulated signal. The pulse widths and duty cycles of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays are sufficient to attenuate ripple of the phase modulated signal during the phase delays of phase modulated signal.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference number throughout the several figures designates a like or similar element.



FIG. 1 (labeled prior art) depicts a lighting system with a power factor correction driver circuit and controller.



FIG. 2A (labeled prior art) depicts various waveforms present in the lighting system of FIG. 1.



FIG. 2B (labeled prior art) depicts an LED driver circuit with dimmer switch compatibility circuits.



FIG. 2C (labeled prior art) depicts another LED driver circuit with dimmer switch compatibility circuitry.



FIG. 3 depicts a light emitting diode lighting system with a power factor correction controller that derives one or more power factor correction control parameters from a phase modulated signal.



FIGS. 4 and 5 depict phase modulated signals having various leading and trailing edge phase delays.



FIG. 6 depicts a phase delay detector.



FIG. 7 depicts exemplar, phase modulated signal and associated PFC switch control signal waveforms.



FIG. 8 depicts an effective resistance model of a PFC LED driver circuit.



FIG. 9 depicts relationships between a phase modulated signal and an inductor current with and without dimming.



FIG. 10 depicts a relationship between duty cycles of a PFC switch control signal and a link voltage.



FIGS. 11 and 12 depict LED apparatuses.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A light emitting diode (LED) lighting system includes a power factor correction (PFC) controller that determines at least one power factor correction control parameter from phase delays of a phase modulated signal. In at least one embodiment, a peak voltage of the phase modulated signal is a PFC control parameter used by the PFC controller to control power factor correction and generation of a link voltage by a PFC LED driver circuit. The phase delays are related to a peak voltage of the phase modulated signal. Thus, in at least one embodiment, detecting the phase delay in one or more cycles of the phase modulated signal allows the PFC controller to determine the peak voltage of the phase modulated signal.


The PFC LED driver circuit supplies an output current to drive LED(s) of an LED apparatus. As the dimming level decreases, the PFC controller decreases a duty cycle of a PFC switch in the PFC LED driver circuit to cause the PFC LED driver circuit to decrease the output current supplied to the LEDs. When the phase modulated signal indicates a dimming level below a threshold value, the PFC controller maintains an approximately constant duty cycle of the PFC switch to, for example, maintain switching efficiency without significantly sacrificing power factor correction.


In at least one embodiment, PFC controller generates a PFC switch control signal to cause the PFC LED driver circuit to respond to decreasing dimming levels as indicated by a dimming signal, such as the phase modulated signal, without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC LED driver circuit, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC LED driver circuit, as the dimming level indicated by the dimming signal increases. The phase modulated signal represents one embodiment of the dimming signal.


In at least one embodiment, the PFC controller generates a duly cycle modulated control signal to control a regulated link voltage of the PFC LED driver circuit and decreases the link voltage when a duty cycle of the control signal decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value.


In at least one embodiment, the PFC controller generates approximately constant pulse widths for the PFC switch control signal during each cycle of phase modulated signal when a duty cycle of PFC switch control signal is below a predetermined threshold.


In at least one embodiment, the PFC controller generates pulses for the PFC switch control signal during the phase delays of phase modulated signal, wherein the pulses of PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays have a period significantly greater than a period of the pulses of PFC switch control signal during an active period of phase modulated signal.



FIG. 3 depicts a lighting system 300 having a PFC controller 302 and a PFC LED driver circuit 304. The PFC controller 302 generates a duly cycle modulated PFC switch control signal CS1 to control the conductivity of switch 306. Switch 306 can be any switch, and, in at least one embodiment, switch 306 is an n-channel field effect transistor (FET). The PFC LED driver circuit 304 is a switching power converter that boosts the phase modulated signal VΦ to a link voltage VC1 across hold-up capacitor 308. In at least one embodiment, the link voltage VC1 has a peak voltage in the range of 200V-400 V. When switch 306 is “OFF” (i.e. non-conductive), diode 310 is forward biased, and inductor 312 drives inductor current iL1 through diode 310. The inductor current iL1 through diode 310 charges capacitor 308 to maintain an approximately constant link voltage VC1. When switch 306 is “ON” (i.e. conductive), the voltage across inductor 312 reverses, diode 310 is reverse biased, and the inductor 312 energizes with the current iL1. PFC controller 302 controls the duty cycles of PFC switch control signal CS1 and switch 306 so that current iL1 is proportional to phase modulated signal VΦ. Capacitor 314 provides filtering to smooth drive current iL1 so that the average drive current iL1 is sinusoidal and in phase with phase modulated signal VΦ.


The PFC controller 302 includes a digital signal processor 316 to perform various operations including determining the pulse width and dub cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1. Digital signal processor 316 is, for example, a digital signal processor. In at least one embodiment, the PFC controller 302 determines the pulse width and duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1 utilizing the algorithms disclosed in Melanson V and Melanson VI.


In at least one embodiment, the pulse width T1 of PFC switch control signal CS1 is determined by digital signal processor 316 by executing a control signal state algorithm represented by Equation [1]:










T






1
2


=



2
·
L


V
Φ_pk
2


·
P
·
TT
·


(

1
-


V
Φ


V

C





1




)

.






[
1
]








“T1” is the pulse width of the PFC switch control signal CS1. “L” represents an inductance value of inductor 312. “VΦpk” is a peak voltage of phase modulated signal VΦ without phase delays. “P” represents a power demand variable related to the power demand of LED apparatus 322. In at least one embodiment, P is a proportional integrator output value as described in Melanson V and Melanson VI. “TT” is the period of PFC switch control signal CS1 and, in at least one embodiment, is also determined as described in Melanson V and Melanson VI. “VΦ” is a sampled value of phase modulated signal VΦ. “VC1” is a sampled value of the link voltage VC1.


In at least one embodiment, all of the PFC control parameters of Equation [1] are known, can be reliably determined directly, or can be reliably determined from the feedback signals VΦ′ and VC1′ except VΦpk. Because phase modulated signal VΦ includes phase delays when dimming the LEDs of LED apparatus 322, the peak voltage VΦpk of phase modulated signal VΦ cannot always be directly measured. However, as described in conjunction with FIGS. 4 and 5, the phase delays of phase modulated signal VΦ can be used by digital signal processor 316 to estimate VΦpk.


In at least one embodiment, PFC controller 302 also controls the output current iOUT in accordance with the exemplary systems and methods described in Melanson IV.



FIGS. 4 and 5 depict cycles of phase modulated signal VΦ having various leading and trailing edge phase delays. Waveforms 400 represent two cycles 402 and 404 having a peak voltage of VΦpk. Cycle 402 includes two phase delays α0 and α1, and cycle 404 includes two phase delays α2 and α3. The peak voltage VΦpk can be measured directly from cycle 402 because the phase delays α0 and α1 are less than T/4, where T is the period of phase modulated signal VΦ. However, the peak voltage VΦpk cannot be measured directly from cycle 404 because the phase delays α2 and α3 are greater than T/4. Although the peak voltage VΦpk can be measured directly from cycle 402, in at least one embodiment, the digital signal processor 316 determines the peak voltage VΦpk for all cycles of phase modulated signal VΦ. In at least one embodiment, the digital signal processor 316 periodically or intermittently determines the peaks voltage VΦpk. In at least one embodiment, the digital signal processor 316 measures each peak voltage VΦpk from each cycle that can be measured.


Referring to FIGS. 3, 4, and 5, phase delay detector 318 receives phase modulated signal VΦ and, in at least one embodiment, determines a digital value of each phase delay αX and βX in each cycle of phase modulated signal VΦ, where X is an index value. To determine the peak voltage VΦpk from the phase delays of phase modulated signal VΦ, phase delay detector 318 detects the phase delays of each cycle of phase modulated signal VΦ. In at least one embodiment, phase delay detector 318 generates a digital value of phase delay signal Φ for each phase delay detected in phase modulated signal VΦ. Each digital value of phase delay signal Φ represents a phase delay, and each phase delay indicates a dimming level. For example, a 50 Hz phase modulated signal VΦ has a period of 1/50 or 0.02 seconds. A dimming level of 25% is represented by a phase delay of (0.5·0.02)·0.25 seconds. Where (0.5·0.02) represents the duration of each half cycle of phase modulated signal VΦ and 0.25 represents the dimming level. Thus, each phase delay signal Φ can also be referred to as a dimmer signal.


Digital signal processor 316 determines the peak voltage VΦpk from the phase delay signal Φ. Each half cycle of phase modulated signal VΦ represents 180 degrees. Each phase delay can be converted into an equivalent phase angle in accordance with Equation [2]:

phase angle=(2·phase delay)/(T)×180°  [2]

where T is the period of phase modulated signal VΦ.


In at least one embodiment, digital signal processor 316 determines the peak voltage VΦpk in accordance with Equation [3]:

VΦpk=abs{VAx/[sin(phase angle)]}  [3],

where “abs” represents the absolute value function of the quantity enclosed by the brackets and VAx represents a peak voltage of the leading or trailing edge associated with the phase delay, and “x” is an index.


For example, if phase modulated signal VΦ is a 50 Hz signal and α01, from Equations [2] and [3] the peak voltage VΦpk for the first half of cycle 402 equals abs{VA0/[sin((2·α0)/0.02)·180)]. If α23, from Equations [2] and [3], the peak voltage VΦpk for the second half of cycle 402 equals abs{VA1/[sin((2·α2)/0.02)·180)].


In at least one embodiment, phase delays α0 and α1 are independently generated as, for example, described in Melanson II and Melanson III. When phase delays in a cycle are independently generated, the peak voltage VΦpk can be updated for each independently generated phase delay.



FIG. 5 depicts a leading edge phase delay ca and a trailing edge phase delay β0. In at least one embodiment, digital signal processor 316 determines the peak-voltage VΦpk in accordance with Equations [2] and [3] for independently generated leading and trailing edge phase delays. When detecting independently generated leading and trailing edge phase delays, in at least one embodiment, digital signal processor 316 receives the raw phase modulated signal VΦRAW to determine start and stop times of each half cycle of a cycle by, for example, sensing the polarity of each half cycle.



FIG. 6 depicts a time-based phase delays detector 600 that represents one embodiment of phase delays detector 318. Comparator 602 compares phase modulated signal VΦ to a known reference Vref. The reference Vref is generally the cycle cross-over point voltage of phase modulated signal VΦ, such as a neutral potential of a building AC voltage. In at least one embodiment, the reference Vref is a voltage value just greater than any expected voltage ripples of the neutral potential. The counter 604 counts the number of cycles of clock signal fclk that occur until the comparator 602 indicates that an edge of phase modulated signal VΦ has been reached. Since the frequency of phase modulated signal VΦ and the frequency of clock signal fclk is known, the phase delay indicated by phase delay signal Φ can be determined from the count of cycles of clock signal fclk that occur until the comparator 602 indicates that the edge of phase modulated signal VΦ has been reached. Thus, phase delay detector 600 is a time-based phase delay detector that detects the phase delays phase delay indicated by phase delay signal Φ using a time-based process.



FIG. 7 depicts exemplary waveforms 700 representing one cycle 702 of phase modulated signal VΦ and pulse waveforms of PFC switch control signal CS1. In at least one embodiment, the PFC controller 302 continues to pulse the PFC switch 306. i.e. turn the PFC switch 3060N and OFF, during phase delays of phase modulated signal VΦ to increase the effective resistance REFF1 of PFC LED driver circuit 304 without additional external components and without additional loss of efficiency.


The phase delays α2 of cycle 702 of phase modulated signal VΦ indicate dimming levels for the LEDs. Increasing phase delays indicate increasing dimming levels and decreasing power demand from PFC LED driver circuit. Referring to FIGS. 3 and 7, half cycles 704 and 706 of phase modulated signal VΦ each include respective active (uncut) regions 708 and 710 having an active time period TA (referred to as “active period TA”). The active period TA Plus the phase delay α2 equals the half cycle period T/2 of cycle 702. Referring to FIG. 1, conventional PFC driver circuit and controllers, such as light source driver circuit 106, cut off the output current iOUT during the phase delay α2. The phase modulated signal VΦ of FIG. 1 often has ripples during the phase delay α2 that can cause problems, such as making the edges of phase modulated signal VΦ difficult to detect.


Referring to FIGS. 3 and 7, in at least one embodiment, during the phase delay α2, PFC controller 302 generates pulses 712 that decrease the effective resistance REFF1 of PFC switch control signal CS1 and attenuates ripples of phase modulated signal VΦ during phase delay α2. By attenuating the ripples of phase modulated signal VΦ during α2, phase modulated signal VΦ is approximately 0 V during phase delay α2 as shown in cycle 702. Attenuating the ripples facilitates more accurate edge detection by phase delay detector 318. A more accurate edge detection facilitates a more accurate determination of the dimming level indicated by phase modulated signal VΦ and a more accurate determination of peak voltage VΦpk. The periods and duty cycles of PFC switch control signal CS1 during phase delay α2 are not drawn to scale. In at least one embodiment, the periods and duty cycles of PFC switch control signal CS1 are sufficient enough to attenuate the ripples of phase modulated signal VΦ. In at least one embodiment, the period of PFC switch control signal CS1 during phase delay α2 is 0.0001 seconds to 0.0002 seconds, which equates to a switching frequency ranging from 10 kHz to 20 kHz. Keeping a dimmer, such as dimmer 104 (FIG. 1) loaded during phase delays improves dimmer performance, thus, removing the need for the additional damping circuitry 282 of LED lamp driver 280 (FIG. 2).


Generally, during the active period TA of phase modulated signal VΦ, PFC controller 302 determines the pulse widths of PFC switch control signal CS1 in accordance with Equation [1]. However, as the phase delay β2 increases, the duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1 also decreases. In at least one embodiment, once the duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1 is below a duty cycle threshold, the [1−(VΦ/VC1)] term of Equation [1] becomes approximately 1. Accordingly, in at least one embodiment, once the duty cycle of PFC controller 302 is below the duty cycle threshold, PFC controller 302 generates pulses 714 of PFC switch control signal CS1 with a constant pulse width and constant duty cycle. In at least one embodiment, the PFC controller 302 generates pulses 714 within a frequency range of 25 kHz to 150 kHz to avoid audio frequencies at the low frequency end and avoid switching inefficiencies on the high frequency end. Additionally, in lighting applications, frequencies associated with commercial electronic devices, such as infrared remote controls, are avoided. In at least one embodiment, the particular duty cycle threshold is a matter of design choice and is, for example, chosen to be a duty cycle when [1−(VΦ/VC1)] term of Equation [1] becomes approximately 1 so that the decreasing the duty cycle does not have an unacceptable effect on the performance of lighting system 300. In at least one embodiment the duty cycle threshold is 0.4.


Pulses 716 of control signal CS1 represent a time expanded window 718 of pulses 714 to illustrate the constant pulse widths of pulses 714. The pulses 716 are exemplary and not necessarily to scale. The duration of window 718 is TA/X, and X is a factor equal to 5/(frequency of PFC switch control signal CS1).



FIG. 8 depicts an effective resistance model of PFC LED driver circuit 304. PFC LED driver circuit 304 has an effective resistance REFF1 from the perspective of a mains voltage source such as the AC voltage source 101 (FIG. 1). In at least one embodiment. PFC controller 302 generates a PFC switch control signal CS1 to cause PFC LED driver circuit 304 to respond to the dimming level indicated by the phase delay signal Φ without decreasing an effective resistance REFF1 of the PFC LED driver circuit 304, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC LED driver circuit 304, as the dimming level indicated by the signal increases. Keeping the effective resistance REFF1 of the PFC LED driver circuit 304 from decreasing as dimming levels increase conserves power.


In at least one embodiment, digital signal processor 316 monitors power demand of the LED apparatus 322 by monitoring the value of power demand variable P in Equation [1]. As power demand of the LED apparatus 322 decreases due to, for example, increased dimming, the value of power demand variable P decreases. By determining the pulse width of PFC switch control signal CS1 in accordance with Equation [1], digital signal processor 316 decreases the pulse width and, thus, the duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1. Decreasing the duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1 keeps the effective resistance REFF1 from increasing with increasing dimming levels.



FIG. 9 depicts exemplary relationships between phase modulated signal VΦ and the inductor current iL1 without dimming in view 902 and with dimming in view 904. Referring to FIGS. 3 and 9, the effective resistance REFF1 of PFC load driver circuit 304 equals VΦ/iL1. In view 902, phase modulated signal VΦ has no phase delays, which indicates no dimming. Because PFC load driver circuit 304 is power factor corrected, the inductor current iL1 tracks and is in phase with the phase modulated signal VΦ. In view 904, phase modulated signal VΦ includes phase delays α1 and α2, which indicates dimming. The dashed lined waveforms 906 and 908 represent the values of the inductor current iL1 if the inductor current iL1 had not decreased with dimming. The solid lined waveforms 910 and 912 indicate the actual value of inductor current iL1 as controlled by PFC controller 302. Thus, the effective resistance REFF1 of PFC load driver circuit 304 does not decrease as dimming levels increase and, in at least one embodiment, actually increases as dimming levels increase.



FIG. 10 depicts an exemplary, graphical relationship 1000 between duty cycles of PFC switch control signal CS1 and the link voltage VC1. Referring to FIGS. 3 and 10, PFC load driver circuit 304 boosts the phase modulated signal VΦ to different link voltages VC1 depending upon the duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1. Decreasing the power demand of LED apparatus 322 results in a decreasing value of the power demand variable P in Equation [1]. In accordance with Equation [1], PFC controller 302 responds to decreasing power demand by LED apparatus 322 by decreasing the duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1. The decreasing power demand by LED apparatus 322 is, for example, caused by dimming the LEDs of LED apparatus 322. In at least one embodiment, boosting the phase modulated signal VΦ to the high link voltage VC1H results in a boost of 120 VAC to an approximately 400 V direct current voltage. As the duty cycle of PFC switch control signal CS1 decreases with decreased power demand by LED apparatus 322, PFC load driver circuit 304 loses efficiency via, for example, switching losses associated with switch 306.


Accordingly, in at least one embodiment, PFC controller 302 generates the duty cycle modulated PFC switch control signal CS1 to control the regulated link voltage Vc1 of the PFC LED driver circuit 304. PFC controller 302 decreases the link voltage VC1 from a high link voltage value VC1H to a low link voltage value VC1L when the duty cycle of the PFC switch control signal CS1 decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold DCTH. The particular value of the duty cycle threshold DCTH is a matter of design choice and is, for example, chosen to increase the efficiency of PFC load driver circuit 304 while providing an adequate link voltage VC1 to provide the power demand needs of LED apparatus 322. In at least one embodiment, the duty cycle threshold DCTH is set at 0.5. In at least one embodiment, for phase modulated signal VΦ having a voltage peak VΦpk of 120V, the high link voltage VC1H is any value within a range of approximately 200V to 400V for a low link voltage VC1L having a respective value within a range of approximately 120V to 175V.


The slope and shape of the transition 1002 from the high link voltage VC1H to the low link voltage VC1L are matters of design choice and depend upon, for example, a desired transition between high link voltage VC1H and the low link voltage VC1L. In at least one embodiment, the slope is 90 degrees, which indicates two possible values, VC1H and VC1L, for link voltage VC1. In other embodiments, the slope is less than 90 degrees and indicates multiple values of link voltage VC1 between high link voltage VC1H and the low link voltage VC1L. The shape of transition 1002 can be linear or nonlinear.



FIGS. 11 and 12 depict exemplary embodiments of LED apparatus 322. LED apparatus 1100 includes one or more LED(s) 1102. The LED(s) 1102 can be any type of LED including white, amber, other colors, or any combination of LED colors. Additionally, the LED(s) 1102 can be configured into any type of physical arrangement, such as linearly, circular, spiral, or any other physical arrangement. In at least one embodiment, each of LED(s) 1102 is serially connected. Capacitor 1104 is connected in parallel with LED(s) 1102 and provides filtering to protect the LED(s) 1102 from AC signals. Inductor 1106 smoothes energy from LED current iOUT to maintain an approximately constant current iOUT when PFC switch 306 is ON. Diode 1108 allows continuing current flow when switch PFC 306 is OFF.


In switching LED system 1210, inductor 1212 is connected in series with LED(s) 1102 to provide energy storage and filtering. Inductor 1212 smoothes energy from LED current iOUT to maintain an approximately constant current iOUT when PFC switch 306 is ON. Diode 1214 allows continuing current flow when PFC switch 306 is OFF. Although two specific embodiments of LED apparatus 322 have been described, LED apparatus 322 can be any LED, array of LED(s), or any switching LED system.


Thus, a PFC controller 302 determines at least one power factor correction control parameter from phase delays of phase modulated signal VΦ.


In at least one embodiment, as a dimming level decreases, the PFC controller 302 decreases a duty cycle of PFC switch 306 in the PFC LED driver circuit 304 to cause the PFC LED driver circuit 304 to decrease the output current supplied to the LEDs. When the phase modulated signal VΦ indicates a dimming level below a threshold value ΦTH, the PFC controller 302 maintains an approximately constant duty cycle of the PFC switch 306 to, for example, maintain switching efficiency without significantly sacrificing power factor correction.


In at least one embodiment, PFC controller 302 generates a PFC switch control signal CS2 to cause the PFC LED driver circuit 304 to respond to decreasing dimming levels as indicated by a dimming signal, such as the phase modulated signal VΦ, without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC LED driver circuit 304.


In at least one embodiment, the PFC controller 302 generates a duty cycle modulated PFC switch control signal CS1 to control a regulated link voltage VC1 of the PFC LED driver circuit 304 and decreases the link voltage VC1 when a duty cycle of the PFC switch control signal CS1 decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value DCTH.


Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A light emitting diode (LED) lighting system comprising: a power factor correction (PFC) controller comprising: an input to receive a phase delay signal indicating a phase delay of a phase modulated dimmer signal; anda digital signal processor, coupled to the input, to receive the phase delay signal and determine a PFC control operating parameter from the phase delay signal and to generate a PFC switch control signal using the determined operating parameter.
  • 2. The LED lighting system of claim 1 further comprising: a time-based phase delay detector to detect the phase delay of the phase modulated signal and generate the phase delay signal as a digital signal.
  • 3. The LED lighting system of claim 1 wherein the digital signal processor is further configured to execute a control signal state algorithm to determine a pulse width of the PFC switch control signal.
  • 4. The LED lighting system of claim 1 wherein the operating parameter is a peak voltage of the phase modulated dimmer signal.
  • 5. The LED lighting system of claim 1 wherein the phase delay signal indicates a dimming level and the PFC controller is further configured to generate a PFC switch control signal to cause a PFC LED driver circuit to respond to the dimming level indicated by the signal without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC LED driver circuit, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC LED driver circuit, as the dimming level indicated by the signal increases.
  • 6. The LED lighting system of claim 1 wherein the PFC controller is further configured to generate a duty cycle modulated control signal to control a regulated link voltage of a PFC LED driver circuit and to decrease the link voltage when a duty cycle of the control signal decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value.
  • 7. The LED lighting system of claim 1 wherein the PFC controller is further configured to generate approximately constant pulse widths for the PFC switch control signal during each cycle of phase modulated signal when a duty cycle of PFC switch control signal is below a predetermined threshold.
  • 8. The LED lighting system of claim 1 wherein the PFC controller is further configured to generate pulses for the PFC switch control signal during the phase delays of the phase modulated signal, wherein the pulse widths and duty cycles of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays are sufficient to attenuate ripple of the phase modulated signal during the phase delays of phase modulated signal.
  • 9. The LED lighting system of claim 8 wherein the pulses of PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays have a period significantly greater than a period of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal during an active period of phase modulated signal.
  • 10. A method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system, the method comprising: receiving a phase delay signal indicating a phase delay of a phase modulated dimmer signal;determining a PFC control operating parameter from the phase delay signal using a digital signal processor; andgenerating a PFC switch control signal using the determined operating parameter.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 further comprising: detecting the phase delay of the phase modulated signal using a time-based phase delay detector; andgenerating the phase delay signal as a digital signal.
  • 12. The method of claim 10 further comprising: executing a control signal state algorithm to determine a pulse width of the PFC switch control signal.
  • 13. The method of claim 10 wherein the operating parameter is a peak voltage of the phase modulated dimmer signal.
  • 14. The method of claim 10 wherein the phase delay signal indicates a dimming level, the method further comprising: generating a power factor correction control signal to cause a PFC LED driver circuit to respond to the dimming level indicated by the signal without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC load driver circuit, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC load driver circuit, as the dimming level indicated by the signal increases.
  • 15. The method of claim 10 further comprising: generating a duty cycle modulated control signal to control a regulated link voltage of a PFC LED driver circuit; anddecreasing the link voltage when a duty cycle of the control signal decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value.
  • 16. The method of claim 10 further comprising: generating approximately constant pulse widths for the PFC switch control signal during each cycle of phase modulated signal when a duty cycle of PFC switch control signal is below a predetermined threshold.
  • 17. The method of claim 10 further comprising: generating pulses for the PFC switch control signal during the phase delays of the phase modulated signal, wherein the pulse widths and duty cycles of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays are sufficient to attenuate ripple of the phase modulated signal during the phase delays of phase modulated signal.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 wherein the pulses of PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays have a period significantly greater than a period of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal during an active period of phase modulated signal.
  • 19. A light emitting diode (LED) lighting system comprising: a power factor correction (PFC) controller to receive a signal indicating a dimming level and to generate a PFC switch control signal to cause a PFC LED driver circuit to respond to the dimming level indicated by the signal without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC load driver circuit, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC load driver circuit, as the dimming level indicated by the signal increases.
  • 20. The lighting system of claim 19 wherein the PFC controller is further configured to decrease a duty cycle of the PFC switch control signal as the dimming level decreases until the dimming level reaches a dimming level threshold and to keep the duty cycle of the PFC switch control signal approximately constant for dimming levels below the dimming level threshold.
  • 21. The lighting system of claim 19 wherein the PFC controller is further configured to increase the effective resistance of the PFC load driver circuit as the dimming level indicated by the dimming signal decreases.
  • 22. A method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system, the method comprising: receiving a signal indicating a dimming level; andgenerating a power factor correction control signal to cause a PFC LED driver circuit to respond to the dimming level indicated by the signal without decreasing an effective resistance of the PFC load driver circuit, as perceived by a voltage source of the PFC load driver circuit, as the dimming level indicated by the signal increases.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 further comprising: decreasing a duty cycle of the PFC switch control signal as the dimming level decreases until the dimming level decreases to a dimming level threshold; andkeeping the duty cycle of the PFC switch control signal approximately constant for dimming levels below the dimming level threshold.
  • 24. The method of claim 22 further comprising: increasing the effective resistance of the PFC load driver circuit as the dimming level indicated by the dimming signal decreases.
  • 25. A light emitting diode (LED) lighting system comprising: a power factor correction (PFC) controller to generate a duty cycle modulated control signal to control a regulated link voltage of a PFC LED driver circuit and to decrease the link voltage when a duty cycle of the control signal decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value.
  • 26. The LED lighting system of claim 25 wherein the PFC LED driver circuit is configured to operate from a mains voltage, and the PFC controller is configured to decrease the link voltage to approximately equal to the mains voltage.
  • 27. The LED lighting system of claim 25 wherein the duty cycle threshold value is a member of the group consisting of 0.5 and between 0.25 and 0.5.
  • 28. A method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system, the method comprising: generating a duty cycle modulated control signal to control a regulated link voltage of a PFC LED driver circuit; anddecreasing the link voltage when a duty cycle of the control signal decreases to a value between zero and a duty cycle threshold value.
  • 29. The method of claim 28 wherein the PFC LED driver circuit is configured to operate from a mains voltage, the method further comprising: decreasing the link voltage to approximately equal to the mains voltage.
  • 30. The method of claim 28 wherein the duty cycle threshold value is a member of the group consisting of 0.5 and between 0.25 and 0.5.
  • 31. A light emitting diode (LED) lighting system comprising: a power factor correction (PFC) controller comprising: an input to receive a phase delay signal indicating a phase delay of a phase modulated dimmer signal; andwherein the PFC controller is configured to receive the phase delay signal and to generate pulses for the PFC switch control signal during the phase delays of the phase modulated signal, wherein the pulse widths and duty cycles of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays are sufficient to attenuate ripple of the phase modulated signal during the phase delays of phase modulated signal.
  • 32. A method of controlling a light emitting diode (LED) lighting system, the method comprising: receiving a phase delay signal indicating a phase delay of a phase modulated dimmer signal;generating pulses for a PFC switch control signal during the phase delays of the phase modulated signal, wherein the pulse widths and duty cycles of the pulses of the PFC switch control signal generated during the phase delays are sufficient to attenuate ripple of the phase modulated signal during the phase delays of phase modulated signal.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) and 37 C.F.R. §1.78 of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/894,295, filed Mar. 12, 2007 and entitled “Lighting Fixture.” U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/894,295 includes exemplary systems and methods and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) and 37 C.F.R. §1.78 of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/909,458, entitled “Ballast for Light Emitting Diode Light Sources,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Apr. 1, 2007 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/047,249, entitled “Ballast for Light Emitting Diode Light Sources,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Mar. 12, 2008 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/926,864, entitled “Color Variations in a Dimmable Lighting Device with Stable Color Temperature Light Sources,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Mar. 31, 2007 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirely. Referred to herein as Melanson I. U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/909,457, entitled “Multi-Function Duty Cycle Modifier,” inventors John L. Melanson and John Paulos, and filed on Mar. 31, 2007 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Referred to herein as Melanson II. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/047,258, entitled “Multi-Function Duty Cycle Modifier.” inventors John L. Melanson and John Paulos, and filed on Mar. 12, 2008 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Referred to herein as Melanson III. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/695,024, entitled “Lighting System with Lighting Dimmer Output Mapping,” inventors John L. Melanson and John Paulos, and filed on Mar. 31, 2007 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/864,366, entitled “Time-Based Control of a System having Integration Response,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Sep. 28, 2007 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Referred to herein as Melanson IV. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/967,269, entitled “Power Control System Using a Nonlinear Delta-Sigma Modulator with Nonlinear Power Conversion Process Modeling,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Dec. 31, 2007 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Referred to herein as Melanson V. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/967,275, entitled “Programmable Power Control System,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Dec. 31, 2007 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Referred to herein as Melanson VI. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/047,262, entitled “Power Control System for Voltage Regulated Light Sources,” inventor John L. Melanson, and filed on Mar. 12, 2008 describes exemplary methods and systems and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (255)
Number Name Date Kind
3316495 Sherer Apr 1967 A
3423689 Miller et al. Jan 1969 A
3586988 Weekes Jun 1971 A
3725804 Langan Apr 1973 A
3790878 Brokaw Feb 1974 A
3881167 Pelton et al. Apr 1975 A
4075701 Hofmann Feb 1978 A
4334250 Theus Jun 1982 A
4409476 Lofgren et al. Oct 1983 A
4414493 Henrich Nov 1983 A
4476706 Hadden et al. Oct 1984 A
4523128 Stamm Jun 1985 A
4677366 Wilkinson et al. Jun 1987 A
4683529 Bucher Jul 1987 A
4700188 James Oct 1987 A
4737658 Kronmuller et al. Apr 1988 A
4797633 Humphrey Jan 1989 A
4937728 Leonardi Jun 1990 A
4940929 Williams Jul 1990 A
4973919 Allfather Nov 1990 A
4979087 Sellwood et al. Dec 1990 A
4980898 Silvian Dec 1990 A
4992919 Lee et al. Feb 1991 A
4994952 Silva et al. Feb 1991 A
5001620 Smith Mar 1991 A
5055746 Hu et al. Oct 1991 A
5109185 Ball Apr 1992 A
5121079 Dargatz Jun 1992 A
5206540 de Sa e Silva et al. Apr 1993 A
5264780 Bruer et al. Nov 1993 A
5278490 Smedley Jan 1994 A
5323157 Ledzius et al. Jun 1994 A
5359180 Park et al. Oct 1994 A
5383109 Maksimovic et al. Jan 1995 A
5424932 Inou et al. Jun 1995 A
5477481 Kerth Dec 1995 A
5479333 McCambridge et al. Dec 1995 A
5481178 Wilcox et al. Jan 1996 A
5565761 Hwang Oct 1996 A
5589759 Borgato et al. Dec 1996 A
5638265 Gabor Jun 1997 A
5691890 Hyde Nov 1997 A
5747977 Hwang May 1998 A
5757635 Seong May 1998 A
5764039 Choi et al. Jun 1998 A
5768111 Zaitsu Jun 1998 A
5781040 Myers Jul 1998 A
5783909 Hochstein Jul 1998 A
5798635 Hwang et al. Aug 1998 A
5900683 Rinehart et al. May 1999 A
5912812 Moriarty, Jr. Jun 1999 A
5929400 Colby et al. Jul 1999 A
5946202 Balogh Aug 1999 A
5946206 Shimizu et al. Aug 1999 A
5952849 Haigh et al. Sep 1999 A
5960207 Brown Sep 1999 A
5962989 Baker Oct 1999 A
5963086 Hall Oct 1999 A
5966297 Minegishi Oct 1999 A
5994885 Wilcox et al. Nov 1999 A
6016038 Mueller et al. Jan 2000 A
6043633 Lev et al. Mar 2000 A
6072969 Yokomori et al. Jun 2000 A
6083276 Davidson et al. Jul 2000 A
6084450 Smith et al. Jul 2000 A
6091233 Hwang et al. Jul 2000 A
6125046 Jang et al. Sep 2000 A
6150774 Mueller et al. Nov 2000 A
6181114 Hemena et al. Jan 2001 B1
6211626 Lys et al. Apr 2001 B1
6211627 Callahan Apr 2001 B1
6229271 Liu May 2001 B1
6229292 Redl et al. May 2001 B1
6246183 Buonavita Jun 2001 B1
6259614 Ribarich et al. Jul 2001 B1
6300723 Wang et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304066 Wilcox et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304473 Telefus et al. Oct 2001 B1
6343026 Perry Jan 2002 B1
6344811 Melanson Feb 2002 B1
6369525 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385063 Sadek et al. May 2002 B1
6407514 Glaser et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407515 Hesler Jun 2002 B1
6407691 Yu Jun 2002 B1
6441558 Muthu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445600 Ben-Yaakov Sep 2002 B2
6452521 Wang Sep 2002 B1
6469484 L'Hermite et al. Oct 2002 B2
6495964 Muthu et al. Dec 2002 B1
6509913 Martin, Jr. et al. Jan 2003 B2
6531854 Hwang Mar 2003 B2
6580258 Wilcox et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583550 Iwasa et al. Jun 2003 B2
6628106 Batarseh et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636003 Rahm et al. Oct 2003 B2
6646848 Yoshida et al. Nov 2003 B2
6657417 Hwang Dec 2003 B1
6688753 Calon et al. Feb 2004 B2
6713974 Patchornik et al. Mar 2004 B2
6724174 Esteves et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727832 Melanson Apr 2004 B1
6737845 Hwang May 2004 B2
6741123 Melanson et al. May 2004 B1
6753661 Muthu et al. Jun 2004 B2
6756772 McGinnis Jun 2004 B2
6781351 Mednik et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788011 Mueller et al. Sep 2004 B2
6806659 Mueller et al. Oct 2004 B1
6839247 Yang Jan 2005 B1
6860628 Robertson et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870325 Bushell et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873065 Haigh et al. Mar 2005 B2
6882552 Telefus et al. Apr 2005 B2
6888322 Dowling et al. May 2005 B2
6894471 Corva et al. May 2005 B2
6933706 Shih Aug 2005 B2
6940733 Schie et al. Sep 2005 B2
6944034 Shteynberg et al. Sep 2005 B1
6956750 Eason et al. Oct 2005 B1
6958920 Mednik et al. Oct 2005 B2
6963496 Bimbaud Nov 2005 B2
6967448 Morgan et al. Nov 2005 B2
6970503 Kalb Nov 2005 B1
6975079 Lys et al. Dec 2005 B2
6975523 Kim et al. Dec 2005 B2
6980446 Simada et al. Dec 2005 B2
7003023 Krone et al. Feb 2006 B2
7034611 Oswal et al. Apr 2006 B2
7050509 Krone et al. May 2006 B2
7064498 Dowling et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064531 Zinn Jun 2006 B1
7072191 Nakao et al. Jul 2006 B2
7075329 Chen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7078963 Andersen et al. Jul 2006 B1
7088059 McKinney et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099163 Ying Aug 2006 B1
7102902 Brown et al. Sep 2006 B1
7106603 Lin et al. Sep 2006 B1
7109791 Epperson et al. Sep 2006 B1
7126288 Ribarich et al. Oct 2006 B2
7135824 Lys et al. Nov 2006 B2
7145295 Lee et al. Dec 2006 B1
7158633 Hein Jan 2007 B1
7161816 Shteynberg et al. Jan 2007 B2
7180250 Gannon Feb 2007 B1
7183957 Melanson Feb 2007 B1
7221130 Ribeiro et al. May 2007 B2
7233135 Noma et al. Jun 2007 B2
7246919 Porchia et al. Jul 2007 B2
7255457 Ducharm et al. Aug 2007 B2
7266001 Notohamiprodjo et al. Sep 2007 B1
7276861 Shteynberg et al. Oct 2007 B1
7288902 Melanson Oct 2007 B1
7292013 Chen et al. Nov 2007 B1
7310244 Yang et al. Dec 2007 B2
7345458 Kanai et al. Mar 2008 B2
7375476 Walter et al. May 2008 B2
7388764 Huynh et al. Jun 2008 B2
7394210 Ashdown Jul 2008 B2
7511437 Lys et al. Mar 2009 B2
7538499 Ashdown May 2009 B2
7545130 Latham Jun 2009 B2
7554473 Melanson Jun 2009 B2
7569996 Holmes et al. Aug 2009 B2
7583136 Pelly Sep 2009 B2
7656103 Shteynberg et al. Feb 2010 B2
7667986 Artusi et al. Feb 2010 B2
7710047 Shteynberg et al. May 2010 B2
7719246 Melanson May 2010 B2
7719248 Melanson May 2010 B1
7746043 Melanson Jun 2010 B2
7746671 Radecker et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750738 Bach Jul 2010 B2
7756896 Feingold Jul 2010 B1
7777563 Midya et al. Aug 2010 B2
7804256 Melanson Sep 2010 B2
7804480 Jeon et al. Sep 2010 B2
7894223 Sato et al. Feb 2011 B2
20020065583 Okada May 2002 A1
20020145041 Muthu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020150151 Krone et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020166073 Nguyen et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030095013 Melanson et al. May 2003 A1
20030174520 Bimbaud Sep 2003 A1
20030223255 Ben-Yaakov et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040004465 McGinnis Jan 2004 A1
20040046683 Mitamura et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040085030 Laflamme et al. May 2004 A1
20040085117 Melbert et al. May 2004 A1
20040169477 Yanai et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040227571 Kuribayashi Nov 2004 A1
20040228116 Miller et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040232971 Kawasaki et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040239262 Ido et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050156770 Melanson Jul 2005 A1
20050168492 Hekstra et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050184895 Petersen et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197952 Shea et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050207190 Gritter Sep 2005 A1
20050218838 Lys Oct 2005 A1
20050222881 Booker Oct 2005 A1
20050253533 Lys et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050270813 Zhang et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050275354 Hausman, Jr. et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050275386 Jepsen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002110 Dowling Jan 2006 A1
20060013026 Frank et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060022916 Aiello Feb 2006 A1
20060023002 Hara et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060067521 Muise Mar 2006 A1
20060116898 Peterson Jun 2006 A1
20060125420 Boone et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060184414 Pappas et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060214603 Oh et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060226795 Walter et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060238136 Johnson, III et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060261754 Lee Nov 2006 A1
20060285365 Huynh et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070024213 Shteynberg et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070029946 Yu et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070040512 Jungwirth et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070053182 Robertson Mar 2007 A1
20070055564 Fourman Mar 2007 A1
20070124615 Orr May 2007 A1
20070126656 Huang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070182347 Shteynberg et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070182699 Ha et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070285031 Shteynberg et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080012502 Lys Jan 2008 A1
20080018261 Kastner Jan 2008 A1
20080027841 Eder Jan 2008 A1
20080043504 Ye et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080054815 Kotikalapoodi et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080116818 Shteynberg et al. May 2008 A1
20080130322 Artusi et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080130336 Taguchi Jun 2008 A1
20080150433 Tsuchida et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154679 Wade Jun 2008 A1
20080174291 Hansson et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080174372 Tucker et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175029 Jung et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080192509 Dhuyvetter et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080224635 Hayes Sep 2008 A1
20080232141 Artusi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080239764 Jacques et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080259655 Wei et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080278132 Kesterson et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090067204 Ye et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090070188 Scott et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090147544 Melanson Jun 2009 A1
20090174479 Yan et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090218960 Lyons et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100141317 Szajnowski Jun 2010 A1
20110121754 Shteynberg et al. May 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (26)
Number Date Country
19713814 Oct 1998 DE
0585789 Mar 1994 EP
0632679 Jan 1995 EP
0838791 Apr 1998 EP
0910168 Apr 1999 EP
1014563 Jun 2000 EP
1164819 Dec 2001 EP
1213823 Jun 2002 EP
1460775 Sep 2004 EP
1528785 May 2005 EP
08743813 Mar 2010 EP
2204905 Jul 2010 EP
2069269 Aug 1981 GB
WO9725836 Jul 1997 WO
0115316 Jan 2001 WO
0197384 Dec 2001 WO
0215386 Feb 2002 WO
0227944 Apr 2002 WO
02091805 Nov 2002 WO
WO2006013557 Feb 2006 WO
2006067521 Jun 2006 WO
WO2006135584 Dec 2006 WO
2007026170 Mar 2007 WO
2007079362 Jul 2007 WO
WO2008072160 Jun 2008 WO
WO2008152838 Dec 2008 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080224629 A1 Sep 2008 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60894295 Mar 2007 US
60909458 Apr 2007 US