The present invention generally relates to fabricating fiber metal laminate composites, and in particular, to utilizing those materials in electric vehicle battery enclosures.
Though electric vehicles (EVs) hold great promise to reduce vehicle emissions compared to conventional gas-powered cars, EVs generally do not have the same range traveling on a full battery charge as a gas-powered car can travel on a full tank of gas. To achieve the same travel range and endurance, a large energy storage unit can be installed within the EV's battery pack. However, adding a larger energy storage unit detrimentally increases the EV's weight, which in turn impacts performance by causing excessive driving resistance and worsening the EV's energy demand.
One way to compensate for increased battery weight is to decrease the battery housing's weight by forming it from very lightweight materials. Yet the lightweight material to be used must offer other qualities as well: high-impact resistance, fire safety, vibration damping, high thermal conductivity, Ingress Protection 67 (IP67) properties for dust protection and water resistance, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, and anti-corrosion properties.
As such, common materials for making EV battery enclosures are insufficient. Steel is too heavy, and aluminum is light enough but does not meet requirements for fire protection, EMI shielding, etc. Thermoset fiber-reinforced polymer composites and fiber metal laminates are more suitable, as they are lightweight and offer fire protection, EMI shielding, etc., but they are brittle, delaminating in an impact due to out-of-plane stress and transverse shear. Thermoplastic matrix-based composites reduce such delamination and offer a high energy absorbing capability during impact. However, because of the solid state of thermoplastic at room temperature, thermoplastic-based composites can only be fabricated by hot-pressing technique.
Thus, there is a need for improved lightweight battery enclosures, which the present invention addresses.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for fabricating thermoplastic fiber-reinforced polymer material (FRP) and fiber metal laminate (FML) composites by a resin-infusion process with a liquid thermoplastic poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin, which has a mixed viscosity of 200 cP at room temperature. The curing process is initiated by benzoyl peroxide in the methyl methacrylate matrix, which follows a radical polymerization process. For the resin infusion fabrication of PMMA-based thermoplastic FML, the reinforcement fabric is extended outside the metal plate to guide the flow of resin. FRP and FML fabricated by this thermoplastic resin infusion process have greater impact resistance compared to that of any FRP and FML fabricated by a thermosetting resin infusion process. The exemplary thermoplastic FRP composites are based on carbon fiber, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber, and the combination of both along with the PMMA resin/matrix. Similarly, the exemplary thermoplastic FML composites are based on a titanium metal alloy, reinforced by carbon fiber, UHMWPE fiber, and the combination of both along with the PMMA resin.
The above invention may be used to address the problem of high impact resistance lightweight battery enclosures. This fiber manufacturing technique yields a suitable material that has higher impact resistance than carbon FRP by minimizing the maximum deformation, lower density than steel and aluminum alloys, enhanced IP67 protection, improved electromagnetic interference shielding to protect the battery pack's electronic components, improved vibration damping, and high in-plane thermal conductivity to dissipate heat. The sandwich combination of ductile metal (aluminum alloy, magnesium alloy, titanium alloy, or steel alloy) with the FRP leads to a formation of FML, a hybrid composite material. The fiber material in the FRP can be carbon fiber, glass fiber, basalt fiber, Kevlar fiber, UHMWPE fiber, or any combination thereof. The fibers are used in the form of fabrics with different weaving patterns and are combined with either thermoplastic or thermosetting resin to form an FRP. The fabrication process of FML is either by vacuum-assisted resin infusion, vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding, or hot-pressing technique. Curing the resin in the FRP system can be in an autoclave, out-of-autoclave, or compression-molding process. The fibers and resin are separately used in the FML/FRP fabrication or used in the form of pre-impregnated resin. The ductile metal used to fabricate the FML is surface modified to enhance the surface functionality so it becomes oleophilic to attract the matrix material from the FRP. The surface modification leads to strong metal and composite interface. Enhancing this interface avoids the delamination between the metal layer and the FRP composites while improving impact resistance.
Embodiments of the invention are described in more details hereinafter with reference to the drawings, in which:
In the following description, a method and system for manufacturing an electric vehicle (EV) battery enclosure from a fiber-metal laminate are set forth as preferred examples. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications, including additions and/or substitutions may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Specific details may be omitted so as not to obscure the invention; however, the disclosure is written to enable one skilled in the art to practice the teachings herein without undue experimentation.
The invention provides an impact-resistant, lightweight, EMI-shielding electric vehicle battery enclosure comprising a housing and a detachable cover positioned over the housing.
The major advantages of this invention stem from its advanced fiber metal laminate (FML) composites. Compared to conventional composite materials, FMLs have superior properties, including light weight, excellent corrosion resistance, flame resistance, high tensile strength and modulus, high impact damage, and fatigue resistance. Generally, an FML is composed of a laminate structure of a metal plate and fiber-reinforced plastics (FRP). This unique geometrical structure features the best traits of each material; incorporating a metal plate as a shield greatly enhances the impact resistance of FRP, especially CFRP. FRP and FML also offer a high stiffness-to-weight ratio, that is, at least 30 GPa/(g/cm3). The fiber used can be, e.g., carbon fiber, glass fiber, Kevlar fiber, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber, and the metal used can be, e.g., aluminum, titanium, magnesium and its alloys. FML composites display exceptional fatigue resistance because the fibers bridge fatigue cracks, as a result of the residual stress system between metal layers and the composite lamina.
A typical electric vehicle (EV) battery pack is an approximately rectangular box 500 with a cover 502 as seen in
These requirements can be better served by utilizing an FML material system. Under the nominal loading conditions of an EV battery pack, the quasi-static load conditions exert pressure on the bottom basal body from the weight of the heavy Li-ion batteries. The front and backload pressures exerted on the battery pack are due to the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle, and load transferred on the long side walls is due to the turning maneuverability and connections with other parts in EV. An FML-based battery enclosure can be safely designed by addressing tensile, bending, and interlaminar properties.
Impact collision presents another major challenging load condition for EV battery casing. Ductile in nature, metals can absorb a large amount of energy in the elastic region up to the yielding and bear a high strain rate before failure in an impact. Composite materials that are brittle due to thermosetting resins may absorb the energy only in the elastic region before different modes of failure occur in the composite laminate. With metal and the FRP composite system, FML amplifies both materials' impact damage resistance. A battery enclosure made of FML improves the robustness of the EV battery casing. The impact resistance of the FML system shows improved impact resistance and minimum deformation instead of the FRP system alone. Introducing a thin metal layer allows the material to resist an impactor that would otherwise create a perforation in the composite system. From this, it is evident that FML has improved impact resistance, which can be adopted in the EV battery casing or enclosure.
Material index (M) is a measure of the combination of material properties, indicating the suitability of the material for a particular application. In the design of a lightweight EV battery pack, structural enclosure parts suitable for high bending stress should use a material index
as high as possible. E is the Young's modulus and p is the volume density of the material system.
Among possible materials for EV battery enclosures/housings, CFRP scores a high material index due to its stiffness and lower density. However, FML that is a combination of metal (aluminum alloy) with CFRP scores a higher material index than other FML. The impact resistance of the FRP system is poor due to the completely brittle system (thermosetting matrix and brittle carbon fiber). FML uses the advantage of ductile aluminum alloy with a combination of brittle FRP, enhancing the impact resistance.
The battery enclosure of the present invention may be fabricated in a Vacuum Assisted Resin Infusion (VARI) process using a configuration of aluminum alloy combined with CFRP.
The fabrication of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA)-based thermoplastic composites system follows a VARI process. The VARI method consists of a vacuum pump, pressure pot, inlet 101, and vacuum outlet 103, hoses for infusion of resin, peel plies 105, breather 102, mesh flow 104, and spiral tube 108 for the fabrication process. The reinforcement in the composites is a plain-woven UHMWPE fabric 20 (
A titanium alloy metal plate 301 (
The fiber metal laminates 40 (
To mitigate galvanic corrosion between CFRP and aluminum alloy, electrically insulating basalt FRP may optionally be used to prevent electrical connection between the carbon and the metal.
To enhance the metal/composite interface, the metal may be surface modified by an electrochemical process. After the surface modification process, the metal shows an enhanced oleophilic surface, which improves the adhesion of FRP. For FML, the interface between metal and FRP is an important feature for the sandwich structure's performance. To increase the adhesive strength at the metal composite interface, several aluminum surface treatment methods may be used to pre-process the aluminum alloy. The electrochemical surface treatment method is followed to modify the metal surface. The primary step in the aluminum surface treatment is phosphoric acid anodization, and a series of preliminary and subsequent treatments may be conducted to complete the treatment processes and to ensure the quality of the treated aluminum.
The complete surface treatment process includes six main steps: degreasing, alkaline cleaning, etching, anodizing, post-anodizing dip, and final rinsing and drying.
To further enhance the metal and composite interface, a film-based thermosetting adhesive may be used between the FRP and the metal layer. Metal, film adhesive, and FRP are cured together to support the co-curing process with the out-of-autoclave process. The battery housing is fabricated by a similar process by combining the metal and FRP together in a metallic mold. After curing the FML lower battery tray, the battery enclosure is processed to add the additional lifting lugs by a drilling process. A sealant such as an IP67-compliant sealant is used to attach on all the sides of the lower battery tray. Followed by the sealant, the FRP-based top cover is attached to the lower battery tray to complete the fabrication process.
Results of tests with a universal testing machine, comparing the adopted FML configuration versus other configurations, show that compared to pure woven CFRP, FML with aluminum alloy has a lower tensile modulus. This is due to the plasticity of the aluminum alloy and the interface failure between metal and CFRP. The maximum stress of FML is significantly lower than pure woven CFRP. For FML with a configuration of Al+Ba+CF+Ba+Al, after adding some layers of basalt FRP and adhesive films between aluminum and CFRP, the metal and composite interface improves, leading to higher strength and modulus. Conversely, a high strain-to-failure is achieved, demonstrating FML's excellent adaptability and flexibility as a structural component. Test results are depicted in
To study the mechanical properties of the thermoplastic FRP and FML composites the samples were cut into the required dimensions as per the ASTM standards. Tensile test (ASTM D3030), Intralaminar shear test (ASTM D5379), Interlaminar shear test (ASTM D2344), Compression test (ASTM D6641), and Flexural tests (ASTM D7264) were carried out to study the mechanical properties. The results are given in the Examples section, below.
The low-velocity impact tests were carried out on the thermoplastic FRP and FML composites. The thermosetting FRP composites that were fabricated by resin infusion process were also tested with a low-velocity impact to show the difference from thermoplastic FRP composite system. The compared results reveal that the PMMA thermoplastic FRP samples show improved performance when absorbing the impact energy and failure of the thermoplastic composites than the thermosetting-resin-based FRP composites.
Several materials and composites were analyzed based on composition and whether or not there is a metal surface modification process performed. The metal volume fraction is shown along with the thicknesses. These materials are later employed in various tests described in further examples. Table 1 lists various composite configurations that were fabricated and tested:
The mechanical properties of various composites and individual components were determined along with the corresponding material index. The results are provided in Table 2:
The general weight configuration of EV battery enclosures was determined by combinations of different metals and fiber-reinforced polymers. The amount of weight reduction by using fiber reinforced polymers is shown in the last column of Table 3.
Based on the various ASTM tests performed above, various properties were determined for the composite materials of the present invention.
The impact response of 4.5 mm based monolithic composites and FML configurations under impact energy of 40 J is depicted in
The foregoing description of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art.
The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Applications 63/138,514 filed 17 Jan. 2021 and 63/194,195 filed 28 May 2021, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63138514 | Jan 2021 | US | |
63194195 | May 2021 | US |