The present invention is in the field of armor against regular and armor piercing firearm projectiles and their fragments as well as debris of various objects (collectively referred to herein the specification and claims as projectiles), and aims at providing an armor suitable for a variety of purposes such as for making protective garments, for fitting enclosures with armored wall portions and the like.
There is a widespread need for protected enclosures with firearm projectile resistant wall portions, transparent or not. Typical examples where transparent such armor is required are shop windows in riot prone areas, armored car windows, fighter plane domes, helicopter windows, domes for a tank commander post, etc.
According to the prior art it is customary to use for such purposes laminated glass panels, e.g. 11 to 40 mm thick or even more, which by the effect of their mechanical properties are resistant against the penetration of various types of firearms. Where it is required to increase the penetration resistance of the armor, the thickness has to be increased, thereby reducing the visibility of such armor panels. Furthermore, such panels are very heavy, weighing about 3 to 4 times more than an opaque armor, and also costly and therefore impractical for many purposes. There is thus an ever increasing need for armor material, in particular lightweight and transparent armor shields.
There is also a widespread need for firearm projectile resistant pliable material, e.g. for making protective garments, bullet resistant tarpaulins and the like. There is furthermore a need for lightweight opaque armor against firearms.
Whilst prior art armor shields are aimed at providing an armor which deforms the shape of the projectile or of its fragments, thus decreasing its penetration ability by reducing its kinetic energy, it is an object of the present invention to provide an armor which diverts the trajectory of the projectile or the fragments thereof. This object is carried out whilst carrying out the above needs.
It is the general object of the present invention to provide an armor which diverts the trajectory of the projectile striking said armor. This object is achieved by imparting the projectile with deflecting momentum as it penetrates through the armor, whereby the trajectory of the projectile is diverted from its original course.
The invention is based on the surprising observation that an armor made of at least one panel of brittle, low fracture toughness material, facing the expected path of a firearm projectile and slantingly oriented with respect to the path of a firearm projectile, subjects the projectile to forces which cause it to be diverted from its original trajectory by virtue of impact forces acting on the projectile as it penetrates through the armor.
Additional layers of material may be introduced behind the brittle material, thus imparting the armor further resistance and durability and to increase protection of an object extending behind the armor.
The arrangement is such that the projectile is diverted in direction essentially perpendicular to the panel of brittle material, and where the armor comprises one or more layers made of ductile material behind the panel of brittle material, the projectile and fragments of the brittle material will not reach the protected object. The one or more ductile layers may adjoin the layer of brittle material or may extent at a different angle with respect thereto.
According to one specific embodiment of the invention, the armor comprises a front layer made of an essentially brittle material and a rear layer made of ductile material, adjoining the front layer and constituting a backing layer. The rear layer i.e. the backup layer may be made of metal, typically steel or aluminum, or of a polymer e.g. PU (Polyurethane), PVC (polyvinylchloride), where transparency is required.
By one particular embodiment, the front layer is made of a woven or other pliable material, whereby the projectile is diverted by virtue of asymmetric impact forces.
According to the present invention the armor comprises a plurality of armor layers arranged in a serrated layout, the armor layers being essentially parallel to one another and extending tilted with respect to an expected trajectory of a projectile.
The material of the front and rear layers used in accordance with the present invention may be transparent or opaque. However, it is in many cases advantageous that it is made of a transparent material, whereby one can see through it. Examples of materials suitable for use as the front layer are glass, glass ceramics, Perspex™, Plexi Glass, PMMA (poly methyl metha acrylate), ALON, Sapphir, Spinelle, various synthetic materials, epoxy resins etc.—all being transparent, brittle materials. It may be monoblock, laminated or composite, e.g. a glass body sheathed between Perspex™ plates. Transparent Perspex™ plates may be covered with scratch-resistant materials e.g. glass or other suitable coatings.
In case of a transparent front layer, it is desired that the rear layer is also transparent.
Where out of the two complementary angles formed between the trajectory of the firearm projectile and the surface of said at least one front layer the obtuse angle is the upper one, the impinging firearm projectile is deflected upwards. In contrast, where the obtuse angle is the lower one an impinging firearm projectile is deflected downward.
An opaque front pliable material may, for example, be made of a heavy duty cloth material such as of Kevlar™, Spectra™, and various epoxy materials. Such materials may be used as they are in composite form, e.g. by being impregnated with a suitable different polymeric material which hardens upon curing.
If desired, a plurality of slanting front layers may be formed together into a multi-layer block in which adjacent layers are suitably glued or cemented to each other. In cases of a thick front layer the projectile may be deflected without penetration.
In operation an oncoming firearm projectile penetrates the at least one front layer and when it emerges therefrom, either intact or broken up, it is deflected from its trajectory, and does not penetrate the protected object. In some cases the projectile will not penetrate through the front layer, made of a brittle, low fracture toughness material.
For better understanding the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, some embodiments will now be described, in a non-limiting manner, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Turning first to
In the embodiment of
The arrangement in accordance with this embodiment is such that as the projectile penetrates through the armor panel 1 it is imparted side impact which cause it to deflect from its original trajectory and maintain its deflection as it emerges from the armor panel 1 in direction of arrow 4. It is appreciated that in some cases the projectile will not even penetrate through the front body.
As can further be seen, of the two angles formed at the intersection of the trajectory of projectile 3 with armor panel 1, the obtuse angle is the upper one. In consequence, once the projectile 3 has penetrated across panel 1 it is diverted upwards as shown by arrow 4, either as a whole or broken up, and either does not at all hit the body 2, or else is readily intercepted by it without passing across.
An advantage of the armor assembly according to the present invention is that it is essentially lightweight such that it is suitable for use as a personal armor garment, etc. According to some particular embodiments the armor is transparent, rendering it suitable for use as a protection armor for protecting windows and domes of vehicles and crafts, etc.
The arrangement according to this embodiment is such that owing to impact forces the projectile is imparted asymmetric impact forces as it penetrates through the panel, whereby it is diverted from its original trajectory i.e. essentially normal to the plane of the panel, as resembled by the arrow 4.
In
In the embodiment shown schematically in
In the embodiment of the invention schematically shown in
The embodiment shown schematically in
The schematic illustration of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
123764 | Mar 1998 | IL | national |
124190 | Apr 1998 | IL | national |
The present application is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/263,845, filed Mar. 8, 1999, now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2318301 | Eger | May 1943 | A |
3380406 | Gosnell | Apr 1968 | A |
4169181 | Molari, Jr. | Sep 1979 | A |
4368660 | Held | Jan 1983 | A |
4594290 | Fischer et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4633528 | Brandt | Jan 1987 | A |
4881448 | Medin et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4901622 | Perry | Feb 1990 | A |
4989493 | Blommer et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5293806 | Gonzalez | Mar 1994 | A |
5362527 | Harpell et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5443883 | Park | Aug 1995 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
877 585 | Nov 1979 | BE |
28 15 582 | Mar 1980 | DE |
42 37 798 | May 1994 | DE |
0 287 918 | Oct 1988 | EP |
2 731 512 | Sep 1996 | FR |
1 328 576 | Aug 1973 | GB |
2 308 401 | Jun 1997 | GB |
WO 9220520 | Nov 1992 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020058450 A1 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09263845 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 09904585 | US |