Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to a composite gun barrel, and more particularly to an improved barrel used in a light mortar for fin-stabilized projectiles.
Description of Related Art
A typical 81-mm mortar system, such as an M252 model, weights approximately 93.5 pounds without ammunition. The barrel 12 portion of the M252 mortar alone weighs approximately 35 pounds. This weight represents a significant carry burden to ground troops, especially when traversing rough and hilly terrain or over long distances. In contrast, the smaller 60-mm mortar system, such as the M224 model, weights approximately 46.5 pounds without ammunition. The barrel 12 portion of the M224 mortar weighs approximately 18 pounds. Naturally, a 60-mm is a significantly easier carry burden for ground troops, at the expense of significantly reduced firepower.
Published specifications for the M252 model (81-mm) mortar system indicate that the system must be capable of sustaining indefinite firings at a rate of 15 rounds per minute (i.e., one round fired every 4 seconds). Furthermore, the M252 model mortar system must be capable of firing 30 rounds per minute for two minutes without over-heating or malfunctioning. As a consequence of these stringent requirements, a muzzle-loading mortar assembly for launching fin-stabilized projectiles must be designed and constructed to withstand unusually high temperatures and harsh abrasions.
There is a need for a muzzle-loading mortar assembly for launching a fin-stabilized projectile that is light and easily transported by ground troops, that can withstand continuous firings without overheating or evidence of harmful erosion, but that does not sacrifice firepower.
According to a first aspect of this invention, a muzzle-loading mortar assembly for launching a fin-stabilized projectile is provided. The assembly includes a barrel. The barrel has a generally tubular construction centered around a longitudinal axis. The barrel has a breech end and an opposite muzzle end. In order to achieve the objectives of this invention, which include enabling a muzzle-loading mortar assembly that is light weight, durable, easily transported by ground troops and that can withstand continuous firings without overheating or evidence of harmful erosion without sacrificing firepower, the barrel is made of a composite construction composed of a plurality of generally concentric layers. The plurality of generally concentric layers includes a rigid supporting liner that is fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of a metal alloy and a metal refractory and a ceramic and a metal matrix composite and a ceramic matrix composite. The liner has an inner cylindrical surface and an outer surface. The plurality of generally concentric layers also includes an overwrap surrounding the outer surface of the liner. The overwrap layer is comprised of continuous fibers embedded in a matrix. The matrix fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of a resin and a polymer and a ceramic and a glass and a metal. Both the liner and the overwrap have respective average axial coefficients of thermal expansion. The compositions and constructions of the liner and the overwrap layer are such that the respective average axial coefficients of thermal expansion are generally equal to one another.
According to another aspect of this invention, a composite barrel assembly for a gun is provided, the gun being of the type that launches projectiles driven by the action of an explosive force. The composite barrel assembly is of generally tubular construction centered around a longitudinal axis. The barrel has a breech end and an opposite muzzle end. The composite construction of the barrel is composed of a plurality of generally concentric layers. The plurality of generally concentric layers includes a rigid supporting liner. The liner is fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of a metal alloy and a metal refractory and a ceramic and a metal matrix composite and a ceramic matrix composite. The liner has an inner cylindrical surface and an outer surface. The plurality of generally concentric layers includes an overwrap surrounding the outer surface of the liner. The overwrap comprises continuous fibers embedded in a matrix. The matrix is fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of a resin and a polymer and a ceramic and a glass and a metal. The plurality of generally concentric layers includes an inner thermal barrier disposed within the inner cylindrical surface of the liner. The inner thermal barrier is fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of an inorganic glass and a metal refractory alloy and a chromium alloy and a functionally graded material and a ceramic. The plurality of generally concentric layers includes an outer shell surrounding the overwrap. The outer shell is comprised of continuous fibers embedded in a high temperature polymer matrix.
The objects of this present invention, which include but are not limited to the provision of a gun barrel for launching projectiles that is light and easily transported by ground troops, that can withstand continuous firings without overheating or evidence of harmful erosion, and that does not sacrifice firepower, are accomplished by the novel composite barrel assembly which has a composite construction composed of a plurality of generally concentric layers. The composite barrel, which is constructed of a plurality of specific layers, enables gun barrels for a wide range of applications, including but not limited to lightweight mortar projectile assemblies, that optimizes structural and thermal performance with exceptionally low mass.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings, wherein:
Referring to the figures, wherein like numerals indicate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views, a muzzle-loading mortar assembly is generally shown at 10 in
Referring still to
The core, or back-bone, of the multi-layered barrel 12 is a rigid supporting liner 30 which defines or establishes the bore of the mortar projectile tube. The liner 30 may be seen in
In the embodiment of
In another embodiment, the liner 30′ may comprise ceramic material as shown for example in
Regardless of whether comprised of a metal alloy, a metal matrix composite, refractory metal, or ceramic composite, the liner 30 may be formed using the materials and fabrication techniques described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,721,478, which is incorporated herein in its entirety, including but not limited to its disclosures concerning fiber wrapping and infiltration/pyrolysis to form the matrix and deposition of refractory metal on the interior of the thin-wall tube.
The liner 30, 30′ may also incorporate one or more phase change materials that respond to heat by changing phases, thereby “absorbing” heat energy. Potentially acceptable phase change materials include materials that change from one solid to another, or from an encapsulated solid to a liquid. The liner 30 may also comprise a shape memory alloy, such as disclosed in US patent application 2012/0227302, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety in all jurisdictions which permit incorporation by reference. The liner 30 may also vary in wall thickness along the length of the tube to accommodate different design pressure requirements or mechanical attachment requirements.
As shown in
In this manner, the inner thermal barrier 32 is disposed within the inner cylindrical surface of the liner 30 and is fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of an inorganic glass and a metal refractory alloy and a chromium alloy and a functionally graded material and a ceramic. Within the context of these composition alternatives, the inner thermal barrier 32 may optionally include fiber reinforcement. The inner thermal barrier 32 provides both thermal resistance and mechanical durability to the bore of the barrel 12 which enable barrel 12 to reliably function as a launcher of fin-stabilized projectiles that is light and easily transported by ground troops, that can withstand continuous firings without overheating or evidence of harmful erosion, but that does not sacrifice firepower. The inner thermal barrier 32 also helps manage thermal effects and differing coefficients of thermal expansion between and among the several dissimilar layers of the barrel 12.
The inner thermal barrier 32 may be applied as a coating by electrolytic or electroless plating, sputtering, explosive cladding, coaxial energetic deposition, electromagnetically enhanced physical vapor deposition, plasma processes, thermal spraying, salt bath treatments or other techniques known in the art. The inner thermal barrier 32 may be applied in multiple layers and include layers having varying compositions and/or applied by a plurality of methods, with multiple layers addressing variations in coefficients of thermal expansion and improving durability. The thermal barrier coating may not only provide thermal resistance and mechanical durability, but may also help manage coefficient of thermal expansion differences between dissimilar materials.
The plurality of generally concentric layers of the barrel 12 may also include an outer thermal barrier 34 surrounding the outer surface of the liner 30, particularly in cases where the liner 30 is of a metal alloy or a metal matrix composite as in
Like the aforementioned inner thermal barrier 32, the outer thermal barrier 34 may be applied by electrolytic or electroless plating, sputtering, explosive cladding, coaxial energetic deposition, electromagnetically enhanced physical vapor deposition, plasma processes, thermal spraying, or other techniques known in the art. The outer thermal barrier 34 may be applied in multiple layers and include layers having varying compositions and/or applied by a plurality of methods, with multiple layers addressing variations in coefficients of thermal expansion and improving durability.
The plurality of generally concentric layers of the barrel 12 further includes an overwrap 36 surrounding the outer thermal barrier 34. In cases where the outer thermal barrier 34 is omitted, the overwrap 36 directly surrounds the outside surface of the liner 30. Therefore, regardless of the base composition of the liner 30 (i.e., metallic or ceramic), the liner 30 is surrounded by the overwrap 36, which is in the form of outer shell matrix composite comprising one or more continuous strand fibers set in a matrix material. The overwrap 36 may include non-cylindrical features or be discontinuous over the length of barrel 12.
Generally stated, the overwrap 36 is a layer built-up by a plurality of strategically laid structural fibers 38 embedded in a matrix 40. Overwrap 36 is a continuous fiber composite (CFC). comprised of continuous fibers 38 such as continuous polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and pitch carbon fibers, continuous glass fibers, continuous ceramic fibers, continuous metallic fibers, continuous graphite fibers, continuous mineral fibers, continuous polymer fibers, and combinations thereof; and a matrix 40 binder material such as an organic polymer, an inorganic polymer, a metal, a ceramic, allotropes of carbon, or a mineral. It may be desirable to promote adhesion or to inhibit corrosion between the liner 30 and the CFC overwrap 36 by means of a surface treatment that is applied before overwrap 36 is fabricated upon liner 30. For example, a CFC overwrap 36 is in “direct contact” with a steel liner 30 at interface 26 even if the steel liner 30's surface is electroplated, anodized, or coated with a chemical compound or mixture, such as paint, resin, hot glass, or other substance.
The fibers 38 are preferably fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of carbon fibers and boron fibers and silicon carbide fibers. Before wrapping around the liner 30, the fibers 38 may be collected into a grouped tow. Instead of tows, the fibers 38 can be collected into fabric prepreg or unidirectional tape. In one embodiment, the individual fiber 38 strands may each have a diameter of approximately 7 μm (microns), with a tow comprising about 12,000 individual carbon fiber strands 38. Despite this distinction, to facilitate the foregoing description the terms fiber and tow may be used more or less interchangeably. Thus, continuous fiber filaments 38 or tows are wound in a back-and-forth helical pattern, or applied as braided or woven fabric or unidirectional tape, upon the liner 30 serving as an integral mandrel. The modulus of elasticity of the fibers 38 could be standard, intermediate or high. Examples of standard modulus carbon fibers 38 include Hexcel AS4 and Mitsubishi Grafil 34-700. Examples of intermediate modulus carbon fibers 38 include PAN-based Hexcel IM2A and Hyosung Tansome® H3055. Examples of high modulus carbon fibers 38 include pitch-based Mitsubishi Dialead® K1352U and Nippon Graphite Fiber Granoc® CN-60. Instead of or in combination with carbon and/or boron fibers 38, the particulates/fibers 38 might comprise one or more ceramic materials, for example continuous silicon carbide fiber such as Nicalon or Sylramic.
The fibers 38 are preferably collected into a flat tow as suggested in the illustrations of
The matrix 40 fabricated from a composition selected from the group consisting essentially of a resin and a polymer and a ceramic and a glass and a metal. One purpose of the matrix 40 is to bind the fibers 38 into a monolithic overwrap layer 36. The matrix 40 may be a resin, polymer, ceramic, glass, metal, or combinations of layers of each. The matrix 40 could be a high temperature epoxy or a high temperature polymer resin such as thermoset addition cure polyimides, thermoplastic condensation cure polyimides, bismaleimides, phenolics, bismaleimides, phthalonitriles, or cyanate esters, etc. The matrix 40 could also comprise inorganic materials such as metal, polysilazane, polysilazane copolymers, polycarbosilazanes, polycarbosilazane copolymers, borazine based polymers, or polyborazaline based polymers, etc. The matrix 40 could also comprise inorganic glasses, such as aluminosilicate glass, soft glass, hard glass, or Jean glass, etc.
In the example of
The bath may be configured to heat matrix 40 using techniques known to those skilled in the art, such as circulating a hot fluid, such as water, through a jacket surrounding the bath, or applying heating elements to the bottom or sides of the bath, or via a heating coil immersed in matrix 40. Matrix 40 comprising a thermoset polyimide resin may be heated up to about 200° F., the precise temperature being dependent on the characteristics of the resin and the volatility of the solvent used, with somewhat lower temperatures preferred. Higher temperatures make matrix 40 less viscous, enabling better impregnation and more uniform winding, but accelerate solvent loss and may accelerate premature cure reactions in a polyimide resin (e.g., imidization) thereby reducing “pot life” of the resin.
Matrix 40 preferably comprises a solvent. Many solvents may be utilized to make the polyimide resin less viscous, including alcohols, aprotic solvents, and mixtures thereof. The PMR polyimide resin will typically include an alcohol co-reactant that acts as a solvent. A solvent having a lower boiling point (i.e., higher volatility) is generally more desirable because it can be more easily flashed off the the infused tow 38 with heating units such as a heat unit 48. Methanol and ethanol are preferred solvents. The inventors have determined that heating P2SI 635LM PMR polyimide matrix 40 to about 40° C. to 60° C. in the bath, and adding methanol solvent to reduce the viscosity of matrix 40 to about 1000 cP, yields good resin impregnation and uniform filament winding operations. It is possible to achieve lower viscosity and better handling characteristics by adding more solvent. However, too much solvent will result in insufficient resin solids in matrix 40 to adequately impregnate a carbon fiber tow 38 with resin. Using too high of a temperature to reduce the resin viscosity results in undesirable side-reactions that reduce the cured thermal and mechanical properties of the polyimide polymer matrix.
A solvent such as methanol in matrix 40 has a lower boiling point than the polyimide resin. It is preferable to flash off much or most of the solvent on the infused tow 38 before it is covered by subsequent windings of tow. As discussed above, heating means may include one or more radiant heaters 48, tube heaters, convective heaters, conductive heat originating from a heated mandrel, or other heating means. In one embodiment, a tube heater surrounds the infused tow 38 and blows air heated to about 300° F. along the tow, directed back towards the bath, and a radiant heater directs heat upon rotating liner 30.
Tow 38 thus infused with the matrix 40 exits the bath and is drawn through a programmable/controllable filament guide orifice 52. Filament guide orifice 52 includes a mechanism for laterally translating generally parallel to the bore axis, thereby guiding the infused tow 38 back and forth along rotating liner 30, so that the infused tow 38 is applied to liner 30 in a helical winding pattern. Filament guide orifice 52 itself may also rotate or translate relative to filament guide orifice 52.
The tow winding system 42 may be controlled by a computer processor, so that rotation speed of the liner 30, lateral movement of the filament guide orifice 52, tension applied to tow 38, and other aspects may be programmed by a user to produce desired patterns and sequences of winding angles, number of layers, and depths of the layers. Such systems are available from, for example, McLean Anderson, 300 Ross Avenue, Schofield, Wis. 54476.
Optionally, one or more heating elements 54 may flash off first stage volatiles present in matrix 40 after the infused tow 38 exits the bath. The heating elements 54 cause volatilization of some or even most of any solvent that is present on matrix 40 infused tow 38. The heating elements 54 may be placed anywhere on the path of infused tow 38, including heating the mandrel liner 30 itself. The heating elements 54 may be radiant heaters, tube furnace/heaters, convection heaters, or other means of heating infused tow 38, including various types of heating elements in combination.
After the excess matrix 40 is mechanically removed and optionally subjected to heating, the infused tow 38 is wound around the liner 30 in a desired helical pattern and to a desired diameter. If the liner 30 rotates at a constant rate, faster lateral movement of the filament guide orifice 52 will result in a helical winding pattern of the infused tow 38 characterized by smaller winding angles relative to the bore axis. At a brisk lateral speed, the helical winding angle of resin infused tow 38 will be small, nearly longitudinal relative to the bore axis. Conversely, slower lateral movement of filament guide orifice 52 will result in larger helical winding angles relative to the bore axis. At very slow lateral speeds, winding angles of the infused tow 38 may be nearly circumferential hoops, i.e., almost 90 degrees. For purposes of the claims and this specification, such nearly circumferential hoops are nevertheless “helical.” It will be appreciated that the term “helical” means substantially helical, even though portions of the liner 30 may not be strictly cylindrical.
It should be understood that the completed overwrap 36 could comprise more than one type of fiber 38. One might simultaneously wind a plurality of tows having different characteristics, e.g., two carbon fiber 38 tow strands having complementary characteristics such as PAN and pitch, or that the type of fiber 38 in tow could be changed as the overwrap 36 is being wound, such as using PAN fiber for hoops then switching to pitch fiber tows for some or all of the longitudinal-oriented windings, without altering the intended meaning of the present invention. Similarly, it is intended that one might use a plurality of tows 38 within the overwrap 36 without departing from the scope of the claimed invention, for example utilizing a different fiber 38 type depending on region, or combining a plurality of tows.
To increase the burst strength of the barrel 12, it may be advantageous to wind tows 38 circumferentially about liner 30 in helical hoops, e.g. ±85° (plus or minus about 5° relative to the longitudinal axis of the barrel 12). For axial strength and stiffness, to minimize barrel 12 from flexing due to shockwaves arising from discharge of a projectile for example, it is preferable to have more longitudinal helical wraps, e.g. ±25° (again plus or minus about 5° measured relative to the longitudinal axis of barrel 12). To promote maximum axial stiffness with the fewest tows, it is preferable to locate the longitudinal helical wraps at or near the outer region of overwrap 36. The surface of overwrap 36 can be made more durable to wear and tear, however, if the outer region of overwrap 36 is wrapped at a less acute angle, e.g. 45°.
Unless the context dictates otherwise, all references herein to “winding angle” or “wrap angle” includes the positive and negative measured fiber angles relative to the longitudinal axis A of the barrel 12. This is illustrated in
As noted, axial stiffness varies with the wrap angle of tow 38.
The overwrap layer 36 is preferably engineered to provide the required axial strength and stiffness, and sufficient burst strength for the barrel 12 while approximately matching the average coefficient of axial thermal expansion for the thin-walled liner 30.
The average effective longitudinal CTE of the overwrap 36 will therefore vary depending not only on wrap angle, but on a variety of other factors including matrix 40 composition (e.g., whether resin versus ceramic or metal, type of resin, etc.), presence of matrix 40 additives such as thermally conductive heat dissipation additives, fiber 38 type, tow tension during wrapping, regional wrap angle sequence, and regional wrap angle thicknesses. All of these factors must be considered when attempting to match the average effective longitudinal CTE of the CFC outer shell to the CTE of the steel liner 30. It is possible to design and fabricate an overwrap layer 36 having a desired average effective longitudinal CTE fabricated from materials other than unidirectional carbon fiber continuous tows, including for example textile composite pre-preg carbon fiber, and carbon fiber braided sleeves. Non-carbon materials may also be used, such as ceramic, glass, mineral, polymer or metallic fibers, or mixtures thereof.
More specifically, it is possible to match the average effective axial CTE of an overwrap 36 to the CTE a liner 30 by using a plurality of wrapping regions, while also providing excellent axial, radial, and torsional strength and stiffness, yet keeping bulk and weight at a minimum. Using known CTE data and wrapping techniques familiar to those skilled in the art of fiber laminates, e.g. the relationships illustrated in
Thus, the overwrap 36 will preferably have an average axial coefficient of thermal expansion that is approximately equal to the average axial coefficient of thermal expansion of the liner 30. However, there may be some offset due to engineering and other constraints. Preferably the inner 32 and outer 34 thermal barriers are designed to exhibit respective coefficients of thermal expansion that are inclusively between the average CTE's of the liner 30 and the overwrap 36. That is to say, the average coefficient of thermal expansion of the inner thermal barrier 32 is preferably within a range established between the average coefficient of thermal expansion of the liner 30 and the average coefficient of thermal expansion of the overwrap 36. And similarly, the average coefficient of thermal expansion of the outer thermal barrier 34 is within a range established between the average coefficient of thermal expansion of the liner 30 and the average coefficient of thermal expansion of the overwrap 36.
The overwrap 36 may be structured in successive regions, with each region having substantially the same winding angle. The radial thickness of each region as a percentage of the overwrap layer 36 radius can vary. Known classical laminate theory may be used to engineer the overwrap 36 having a wide range of average effective longitudinal CTEs using a plurality of layered wrapping regions. The average effective CTE of the composite overwrap 36 is adjusted by varying the wrap angles of the plurality of regions, the regions' radial thicknesses, and the number and sequence of regions. The CTE may also be varied by changing the composition of matrix 40, the type of fiber 30, and the tension at which fiber tow 38 is wrapped on liner 30. For example, one embodiment that approximately matches the CTE of type 416 stainless steel inner liner 30 with the CTE of CFC overwrap 36 comprises intermediate modulus PAN precursor carbon fibers and thermoset epoxy resin. This embodiment not only virtually eliminates thermal stresses due to CTE mismatch that can lead to deformation and displacement, but also provides superior performance, durability, with relatively low bulk and weight, at a commercially viable price for materials. “Approximately matches” for purposes of this specification and the claims means that the inner liner's longitudinal CTE is within 1 ppm/° F. of the average effective longitudinal CTE associated with the CFC outer shell.
In addition to matching the average effective longitudinal CTE of overwrap 36 with liner 30, a superior barrel 12 design also exhibits high axial strength and stiffness, low interlaminar shear stress during operation, and high hoop strength. Low angle plies (e.g., ±25°) provide more axial stiffness than higher angles. Moreover, the further away a given mass of longitudinal plies is located from the liner 30, the greater its contribution to axial stiffness. However, placing longitudinal low-angle plies on the outside of barrel 12 compromises durability, because they are more likely to delaminate or suffer interlaminar failure, such as when rubbed against a rough surface. Placing higher angle plies in the outer regions enhances durability. Preferably, the overwrap 36 will have an axial stiffness of at least 5.5 Msi and a modulus in the radial plane (the radial plane containing angle E on
Rather than drawing the tow 38 through wet matrix bath, a dry towpreg (i.e., fiber 38 that has been previously coated and/or impregnated with a matrix 40 having a high glass transition temperature) may be wrapped on the rotating liner 30 then dry-cured with heat and/or pressure. Imidized towpreg 38/40 may be fabricated by first processing a polyimide resin to a partially-cured state in the following manner. A polymerizable monomeric polyimide resin (PMR) is heated to about 300-500° F. for between about thirty minutes to four hours to imidize the resin so that oligomers form, having reactive endcaps. Preferably, the heat is withdrawn and the resin is cooled before the functional endcapping agents on the oligomers commence significant reacting and cross linking. The imidized polyimide resin, being now in solid form, may then be ground into a fine powder. This powder may then be electrostatically coated on a fiber 38 or split tape, then optionally thermally fused to the fiber 38 or tape before re-spooling.
In another embodiment, matrix 40 (or the dry partially cured towpreg 38/40) also comprises particles of a thermally conductive additive. The additive particulate may theoretically comprise any solid having a higher thermal conductivity than the resin in a polymer matrix composite (PMC), such as metal, ceramic, or chopped pitch carbon fiber. Graphene platelets, ground graphite foam, or carbon nanotubes also have good thermal conductivity. Due to its combination of relatively low density, higher thermal conductivity, cost, and other superior attributes within the cured PMC, metal is a preferred thermal conductive additive material, and more preferably aluminum.
Adding significant quantities of thermal conducting additive could adversely increase the viscosity of the matrix 40. For example, graphene platelets exhibit excellent thermal conductivity but tend to make resin mixture unacceptably viscous. Graphene platelets might have an area (X-Y dimension) between 1 and 50 micrometers (μm) but a thickness of only about 50-100 nanometers (nm), yielding an aspect ratio approaching 1000:1. Particles having such high aspect ratios exacerbate the viscosity issues afflicting polyimide resins discussed above. Rather than focusing on additive materials having the best thermal conductivity, an alternate approach is to employ a material that allows maximization of additive volume versus additive surface area. This approach suggests the additive particles should be approximately spherical.
In one embodiment, the additive particles are metal and have generally spherical shape. The metal spheres comprise approximately 0.2% to 50% by weight of matrix 40 (about 0.1% to 25% by volume). In another embodiment, the additive particles are themselves comprised of two or more sizes in order to more efficiently increase the thermal conductivity of the composite with minimal effect on processing characteristics. Having at least two sizes of thermally conductive particles in matrix 40 improves particle packing within the interstitial spaces with less impact on the resin viscosity and consequently improves heat transfer characteristics while keeping viscosity manageable.
In one embodiment, fiber strands 38 are approximately 7 μm in diameter and the thermal conducting additive comprises three sizes of approximately spherical aluminum particles, the smallest particles being about 0.1-1 μm in diameter, the medium particles being about 1-3 μm in diameter, and the large particles being about 3-4 μm in diameter. These particle sizes can vary depending, for example, on the size of the fibers 38. For example, the largest particles could measure 10 μm. Most of the additive consists of small particles and medium particles; a significantly smaller fraction is large particles. By formulating and distributing the thermal conductive additive in such fashion, many of the particles will be in close proximity or even touching each other, and preferably in close proximity and/or touching adjacent fiber tows 38, with the larger particles tending to occupy the larger interstitial spaces and the smaller particles occupying the smaller voids, which voids were formerly occupied by the solvent or volatile fraction of matrix 40 that was volatilized in the curing process. The thermal conducting additive particles have higher thermal conductivity than resin, thereby making the PMC more thermally conductive. On average, the plurality of sizes of thermally conductive additive spheres occupy a higher volume fraction of the interstitial space otherwise present in the PMC, leading to higher thermal conductivity of overwrap 36.
After winding wet resin tow 38 or heated towpreg 38/40, the partially formed composite barrel 12 is removed from the chucks 46 and subjected to heat and/or pressure to completely cure the matrix composition 40. For wet resin systems, depending on the amount of volatiles present prior to commencing the cure process, a complete cure might require removing about 15% of the mass of the freshly wound structure. It is generally better to remove the volatiles earlier in the curing process to minimize formation of voids in the matrix.
Regardless of whether the tow is wound or laid on liner 30 wet or dry, it is more difficult to cure structures incorporating polyimide resins than common epoxy-based resins. In wet resin applications particularly, it is difficult to remove volatiles from the fiber 38 resin matrix 40 without creating voids. When a polyimide resin is used with flat or large-radius panels, volatile transport is easier because volatiles can escape to the open edges of the surface, and/or more readily migrate between fabric layers. In filament winding applications, however, these gasses can be trapped between the continual windings.
Voids in the overwrap 36 have the undesirable effects of reducing strength, stiffness, and thermal conductivity. Satisfactory results are even more difficult to achieve when curing an item produced by filament winding, in contrast to curing flat impregnated fabric sheets. The impervious liner 30 forces volatiles to migrate radially outward through a plurality of densely wound layers (with a much smaller portion of volatiles migrating to the breech 14 and muzzle 16 of the barrel 12). The curing problem may be compounded still further when thermally conductive additives are present in matrix 40.
A cured overwrap 36 according to one embodiment is produced by first providing PAN carbon fibers 38 and a matrix 40 comprising P2SI 635LM polyimide resin and about 40% concentration by weight of generally spherical aluminum particles between 1 and 5 microns. Such a matrix 40 has a glass transition temperature of about 635° F. after cure. The wet fiber tows 38 are passed through a tube heater as described above then wound around a liner 30 using the wet-resin system depicted in
In a first stage, the temperature in the autoclave is gradually raised, over about 5 to 10 hours, to about 350° F. To assist in volatile transport out of the overwrap 36, vacuum may be applied to liner 30 during this stage. In a second stage, the oven or autoclave temperature is increased to about 500-536° F. for between 2 and 8 hours to imidize the PMR polyimide resin mixture solution to form oligomers having reactive endcaps. At this stage, all volatiles are essentially removed from the overwrap layer 36 and the functional endcapping agents on the oligomers may start reacting and cross linking. During this second stage of the cure, pressure of between 10 and 400 psi, preferably about 200 psi, is applied to facilitate consolidation. In a third stage, the temperature within the oven or autoclave is raised even further to about 600-700° F., preferably for at least four hours, to accomplish a final cure, i.e., substantially completing cross-linking of the imidized polyimides by reacting the endcapping agents and stabilizing the carbon-fiber/resin mixture matrix. The total curing time within the oven or autoclave is preferably 14-24 hours. The autoclave may remain pressurized during the second and third stages.
Following cooling, the cured overwrap 36 with embedded liner 30 may optionally be placed on a lathe and ground down to desired finish diameter with one or more abrasive tools such as diamond-coated grinding and polishing wheels.
Returning again to
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, particular features of one embodiment can replace corresponding features in another embodiment or can supplement other embodiments unless otherwise indicated by the drawings or this specification.
This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 62/131,561 filed Mar. 11, 2015. In addition, this application is a Continuation in Part of International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/69403 filed Dec. 9, 2014, which claims priority to US Provisional Patent Application No. 61/913,825 filed Dec. 9, 2013, and this application is also a Continuation in Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/914,694 filed Feb. 26, 2016, which claims priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/US14/53194, which claims priority to US Provisional Patent Application No. 61/871,154 filed Aug. 28, 2013 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/873,771 filed Sep. 4, 2013, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference and relied upon.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2845741 | Day | Aug 1958 | A |
2847786 | Day | Aug 1958 | A |
3517585 | Slade | Jun 1970 | A |
3879244 | Varlas | Apr 1975 | A |
4360626 | Manwiller | Nov 1982 | A |
4641450 | Moll et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4669212 | Jackson | Jun 1987 | A |
4685236 | May | Aug 1987 | A |
4755555 | Manwiller et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4841836 | Bundy | Jun 1989 | A |
5013817 | Ohta et al. | May 1991 | A |
5043419 | Ohta et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5054224 | Friar | Oct 1991 | A |
5125179 | Campbell | Jun 1992 | A |
5191165 | Oskarsson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5341719 | Bullis | Aug 1994 | A |
5348598 | Vives et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5531150 | Gegaregian | Jul 1996 | A |
5600912 | Smith | Feb 1997 | A |
5657568 | Christensen | Aug 1997 | A |
5692334 | Christensen | Dec 1997 | A |
5804756 | Christensen | Sep 1998 | A |
5817418 | Goto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5886129 | DeColibus | Mar 1999 | A |
6189431 | Danner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6889464 | Degerness | May 2005 | B2 |
7650710 | Conroy et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7721478 | Withers | May 2010 | B2 |
7758781 | Schmeckpeper et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7798046 | Burkholder | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802963 | Holland et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7921590 | Briggs | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934332 | Briggs | May 2011 | B2 |
7934652 | Hasselbring | May 2011 | B2 |
7963202 | Becker et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8020333 | Hall | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8198356 | Dauer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8316568 | Briggs | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8595971 | Johnson | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8677670 | Christensen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20030078170 | Brown | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030228466 | Wei et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040244257 | Degerness | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050175805 | Hild et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050268517 | Withers et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060135655 | Miller | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070256345 | Hall et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261599 | Schwab et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090068441 | Swaroop et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090217812 | Whitaker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100304119 | Bonneau et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100310823 | Albertelli et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110162246 | Briggs | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120052287 | Bonneau et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005155935 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007064442 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2015031635 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2015130379 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Emerson et al., Approaches for the DEsign of Ceramic Gun Barrels, Nov. 1, 2006, U.S. Army Research Laboratory. |
Heim et al., ONR's Advanced Gun Barrel Technologies Program, Department of the Navy Science & Technology. |
Machine Translation of JP 2005-155935 to Ishizuka, European Patent Office, Jun. 2005. |
Littlefield et al., Prestressed Carbon Fiber Composite Overwrapped Gun Tube, J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 134(4), 041008 (Jul. 27, 2012). |
Prestressed Carbon Fiber Composite Overwrapped Gun Tubepeek Resin. |
“Continuous Fiber Reinforcements” (Automated Dynamics) Jun. 10, 2014 (Jun. 10, 2014) [online].[retrieved from the Internet on Jun. 24, 2016], https://web.archive.org/web/20140610071918/http:i/www.automateddynamics.c,om/article/ thermoplastic-composite-basics/types-of-thermoplastic-composites/continuous-fiberreinforcements, entire document. |
“U.S. Marines Firing M252 81mm Mortar System” (AiirSource Military) Jan. 18, 2014 (Jan. 18, 2014) [Youtube.com], https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Tk3-cQ40tw, entiredocument. |
Wu, Qi-Jun, Partial English translation of “Researches on the theory and application of composite barrel,” Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Aug. 2011, 14pgs. |
Wu, Qi-Jun, Researches on the theory and application of composite barrel, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Aug. 2011, China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, http://www.cnki.net, pp. 1-7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160265863 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62131561 | Mar 2015 | US | |
61913825 | Dec 2013 | US | |
61873771 | Sep 2013 | US | |
61871154 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2014/069403 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 15067481 | US | |
Parent | 14914694 | US | |
Child | PCT/US2014/069403 | US |