Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6589147
-
Patent Number
6,589,147
-
Date Filed
Saturday, September 8, 200123 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, July 8, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Smith; Scott A.
- Chukwurah; Nathaniel
Agents
- The Law Offices of Coe F. Miles, P.C.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 493 269
- 493 292
- 493 295
- 493 296
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A former whose wing component incorporates periodic openings, a tube component (that may, or may not, incorporate periodic openings) and a base component (that is shaped to conform substantially to the former's tube geometry) is described. Such a former, may be significantly less heavy than prior art formers (for a given size package) while simultaneously providing improved performance and durability. A former assembly that includes the former, a cross-bar, a top-plate and spacers is also described. Each of the cross-bar, top-plate and spacers may use aluminum and/or incorporate hollowed pockets to further reduce the assemblies weight.
Description
BACKGROUND
The invention relates generally to product packaging systems and, more particularly but not by way of limitation, to a bag former and former assembly for use in a packaging system.
As shown in
FIG. 1
, a product packaging system
100
comprising three major components: the product
105
to be packaged; packaging material
110
from which packages are formed; and former
115
. Product
105
may comprise virtually any material including, for example, liquids, powders, solids and bulk material. Package material
110
is typically a thin film with text and graphics that identify the product (e.g., potato chips or coffee) and supplier (e.g., Company XYZ). Former
115
is an assembly that manipulates package material
110
into the desired shape (e.g., a rectangular or elliptical bag) and forms the package's seal, while the packaging system itself provides the product and actually seals package material
110
to form an enclosed volume (packages
120
).
FIG. 2
shows a typical prior art longitudinal-type packaging system
200
. As shown, product
105
and packaging material
110
is introduced to former
115
where material
110
is shaped and aligned by wing
205
to conform about product filing tube
210
and to form a seam. The seam is longitudinally sealed by sealing device
215
so that material
110
forms a cylinder
220
. Feeding device
225
pulls packaging material
110
(specifically cylinder
220
) downward so that sealing/cutting device
230
seals cylinder
220
to form product package
120
.
For economic reasons, it is important that packaging systems such as
100
and
200
operate at high speeds and for long periods of time. This, in turn, requires that former
115
be constructed of material that is mechanically strong (e.g., rigid), extremely wear resistant, not susceptible to corrosion and presents low resistance to packaging material
110
. The latter is important because as packaging material
110
is pulled over wing
205
component wear can, over time, result in a former
115
that creates uneven seams or wrinkles, creases or tears packaging material
110
as it is pulled over the wing's
205
surface.
Former
115
is typically designed to produce a package having a predetermined size and shape. For example, a first former may be designed to produce rectangular bags having a width of four (4) inches for use in small snack or candy products. A second former may be designed to produce elliptical bags having a width of eight (8) inches for use with breakfast cereal products. Still another former may be designed to produce bags having a width of twenty four (24) inches to package industrial/commercial frozen food. Accordingly, when a different size package (for the same or a different product) is needed, former
115
is replaced by a different former designed to produce a package having the new/correct size. For the reasons discussed above, typical former assemblies are fabricated out of solid stainless steel and, as a result, are quite heavy. Thus, it is often difficult for a worker to change the former because of the former's weight. Large formers often require multiple personnel or a small crane to change. This, in turn, reduces the amount of time the packaging system can be used to package product. This is especially true for larger formers such as those used to package, for example, industrial food packages (e.g., commercial-size containers of frozen foods).
Thus, it would be beneficial to provide a former that is wear and corrosion resistant, presents low friction to packaging material and yet is significantly lighter than current formers.
SUMMARY
In one embodiment the invention provides a former that includes a wing having a concave surface with periodic openings, a tube coupled to the wing along a first edge to form a crown and a base coupled to the tube along a second edge of the tube and conforming substantially to the shape of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging system. The tube may be designed to facilitate fabrication of substantially any shape package such as, for example, a rectangle, a square, a circle or an ellipse. In another embodiment of the invention, the tube includes periodic openings. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the former may include a cross-bar (coupled to the base and adapted to attach to a packaging system), a top-plate (coupled to the wing substantially parallel to the plane of the cross-bar and adapted to attach to a packaging system) and spacers that interconnect the cross-bar and top-plate. The wing may be fabricated from 2-WL rigidized stainless steel, the tube and base from stainless steel and the cross-bar, top-plate and spacers from anodized aluminum or other lightweight material. In addition, the cross-bar and top-plates may incorporate hollowed-out regions. Finally, a former in accordance with the invention may include a secondary product inlet to allow the introduction of additional material (other than the primary product) into a package formed by the former.
A former in accordance with the invention may be substantially less heavy than a prior art former designed to fabricate the same package while simultaneously providing improved operating performance, vis a vis the ability to generate packages with uniform seams, and equal or improved durability.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
shows a block diagram of a product packaging system.
FIG. 2
shows a longitudinal-type packaging system.
FIG. 3
shows an isometric view of a former in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
FIGS. 4A through 4C
show engineering-style diagrams for the former of FIG.
3
. (All measures are in inches.)
FIGS. 5A through 5C
show engineering-style diagrams for a prior art former. (All measures are in inches.)
FIGS. 6A and 6B
show a former assembly in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
FIGS. 7A and 7B
show engineering style diagrams for the cross-bar component of FIG.
6
. (All measures are in inches.)
FIGS. 8A and 8B
show engineering style diagrams for the top-plate component of FIG.
6
. (All measures are in inches.)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
A lightweight former and former assembly is described. The following embodiments of the invention are illustrative only and are not to be considered limiting in any respect.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention (see FIG.
3
), former
300
comprises wing
305
having periodic openings
310
therein, tube
315
having periodic openings
320
therein and base ring
325
. In combination, wing
305
, tube
315
and base ring
325
provide a former that is significantly less heavy than prior art formers while simultaneously providing superior performance (e.g., the ability to generate packages with uniform seams) and that is at least equal in terms of durability.
Wing
305
is conformed into a standard shape to guide packaging material along surface
330
, over crown
335
and down tube
315
. (Product is typically supplied to a formed package through a product supply tube located “inside” tube
315
, not shown in
FIG. 3.
) Periodic openings
310
not only reduce the weight of wing
305
, they can also improve its operating performance by reducing the drag (friction) experienced by packaging material being drawn over the wing. Reduced drag, in turn, reduces the wear experienced by former
300
which, ultimately, allows former
300
to form more consistently uniform seals for a longer period than prior art formers. Periodic openings
310
provide reduced drag through at least two mechanisms. First, periodic openings
310
reduce drag by reducing the amount of surface area over which packaging material is drawn. Second, periodic openings
310
allow air to flow from the wing's under-side (that side facing tube
315
) toward surface
330
creating a cushion of air on which packaging material may “float” as it is drawn into former
300
. In the embodiment of
FIG. 3
, substantially all of surface
330
is dimpled with a pattern
345
that further facilitates the movement of packaging material. In one embodiment, wing
305
is constructed of 2-WL rigidized stainless steel. Other dimpling patterns, or no dimpling pattern, may also be used. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that periodic openings
310
may be formed using various shapes. For example, circles, ellipses, squares and rectangle openings may also be used. In addition, periodic openings
310
could encompass more or less of wing surface than shown in FIG.
3
. An important aspect of periodic openings
310
is that they are sufficiently numerous as to reduce the wing's weight and improve its operating characteristics, but not so numerous as to adversely effect (i.e., reduce) the wing's strength and rigidity. Both wing strength and rigidity are important to ensure that packaging material flows evenly, smoothly and uniformly over the wing.
Tube
315
couples to wing
305
on one edge, forming crown
335
, and to base ring
325
along a second edge. Periodic openings
320
reduce the tube's weight and the drag experienced by packaging material as it is drawn around the tube during package formation (compared to prior are former tubes). Thus, periodic openings
320
are used for the same purposes, provide the same benefits (reduced weight and improved operational performance), and have the same limitations regarding strength and rigidity as do periodic openings
310
in wing
305
.
Base ring
325
is coupled to tube
315
to provide a substantive base for and is further coupled to a folded flap of wing
305
to provide additional rigidity (see below for a discussion of element
430
in FIG.
4
A). Base ring
325
further allows former
300
to be coupled to a packaging systems through any convenient means such as, for example, bolts via bolt-holes
355
. Base rings in accordance with the invention are formed into a shape complementary to the shape of the package to be formed (in
FIG. 3
, a cylinder having a circular cross-section) and are only as substantive as needed to provide structural stability and coupling to a packaging system. In prior art formers, the base element is typically a large rectangular plate and is substantially more massive than that of base ring
325
.
In one embodiment, wing
305
, tube
315
and base ring
325
are manufactured from stainless steel. Periodic openings
310
and
320
are fabricated via laser cutting techniques. Crown
335
is formed by soldering using high silver content solder, and tube
315
is coupled to base ring
325
by welding. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other materials, fabrication techniques and coupling materials could be used. For example, a composite material rather than a metal could be used in one or more of the wing, tube and base ring elements. In addition, periodic openings could be applied to wing
305
and not to tube
315
, or versa visa. Further, periodic openings could be formed using water jet, stamping, milling or such other techniques as may be desired or feasible depending upon the material used for the underlying element (wing, tube or base ring).
FIGS. 4A through 4C
show engineering-style diagrams for a former in accordance with
FIG. 3
that has been designed to produce a package having a 9.646 inch width. Referring to
FIG. 4A
, wing
400
is manufactured from 24 gauge 2-WL rigidized stainless steel and periodic openings
405
are restricted to a specified region of the wing element. Referring now to
FIG. 4B
, tube
410
is manufactured from 16 gauge stainless steel and periodic openings
415
are restricted to the center portion of its surface. Finally,
FIG. 4C
shows base ring
420
having a substantially circular shape (conforming to the shape of tube
410
) and includes three (3) bolt holes
425
to allow coupling to a packaging system. The region denoted in
FIG. 4A
as
430
is folded (along the horizontal dashed line) and attached to tube
410
to provide additional rigidity to the former.
By comparison, a prior art former designed to produce the same size packages as the former of
FIGS. 3 and 4
are shown in
FIGS. 5A through 5C
. Referring to
FIG. 5A
, wing
500
is manufactured from 24 gauge 2-WL rigidized stainless steel and has no periodic openings. Referring now to
FIG. 5B
, tube
505
is manufactured from 16 gauge stainless steel and, similarly, has no periodic openings. A comparison of prior art tube
505
and tube
410
, shows a tube in accordance with the invention may also have a notch at that edge not used to form the crown (i.e., the edge not coupled to the wing). This notching further reduces the weight of a former in accordance with the invention over prior art formers. Finally,
FIG. 5C
shows prior art base plate
510
incorporating bolt holes
515
that may be used to connect it to a packaging system. Prior art base plate
510
is substantially larger than base ring
420
in accordance with the invention. Combined, prior art wing
500
, tube
505
and base plate
510
may be so significantly heavy that base plate
510
includes holes
520
for attachments to allow a small crane to move the former. While a comparison of
FIGS. 4 and 5
highlight the structural differences between a former in accordance with the invention and a prior art former, they do not show the improved performance (through reduced drag) and longer life (through reduced wear) afforded by a former in accordance with the invention.
Referring to
FIGS. 6A and 6B
, one embodiment of a former assembly in accordance with the invention includes the basic former (see
FIGS. 4A-4C
) and cross-bar
600
, spacers
605
, top-plate
610
, secondary product inlet
615
, and product tube
620
. Secondary product inlet
615
provides a means to introduce a secondary product into the package formed by former (comprising wing
400
, tube
410
and base
420
) such as, for example, a product coupon, a toy or a gaseous material (e.g., nitrogen). Product tube
620
provides a mechanism to deposit the product being packaged into the package. As shown in
FIGS. 7 and 8
, cross-bar
600
and top-plate
605
may incorporate hollow regions
700
and
800
that are designed to reduce the component's weight without adversely affecting its strength and rigidity. To further reduce weight over prior art former assemblies (typically fabricated using solid stainless steel), cross-bar
600
and top-plate
610
may be comprised of aluminum and, in particular, anodized aluminum. Similarly, spacers
605
may be fabricated from aluminum or anodized aluminum. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that a former assembly may include a former only (see FIGS.
3
and
4
), a former with one or more cross-bars
600
, or a former with one or more cross-bars
600
, a plurlaity of spacers
605
and one or more top-plates
610
.
Table 1 shows the weight difference for the different elements of a former assembly made in accordance with the invention as compared to a comparable prior art former assembly. The weights listed in Table 1 correspond to a former assembly designed to produce a package having a 9.646 inch width and using the materials described with respect to
FIGS. 4 and 6
. The prior art former assembly is one designed for an identical package, but using industry standard solid stainless steel components.
TABLE 1
|
|
Weight Comparison Between an Illustrative Former Assembly In
|
accordance with the invention and a Prior Art Former Assembly
|
Weight of
|
Inventive
Weight of Prior Art
Weight Saved By
|
Component
Embodiment (lbs)
Embodiment (lbs)
Invention (%)
|
|
Former
3.8
8.6
55.8
|
Cross-Bar
3.0
4.4
31.8
|
Spacers
2.8
8.0
65.0
|
Top-Plate
10.8
14.4
25.0
|
Total
20.4
35.4
42.4
|
|
It is emphasized that not only does the invention result is a significantly less heavy former/former assembly than prior art techniques, but also a former that provides significantly improved performance and durability (see discussion above regarding FIG.
3
).
While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, numerous modifications and variations will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. For instance, a former in accordance with one embodiment of the invention may incorporate periodic openings in the wing only, the tube only, or a combination thereof. In addition, a former in accordance with one embodiment of the invention may include more, or fewer, periodic openings than that illustrated in the embodiment of
FIGS. 3
,
4
and
6
. Further, a former in accordance with another embodiment of the invention may include a means of introducing a secondary product into the package formed by the former. One example secondary product is a food coupon. A second example of a secondary product is a small toy. It is intended, therefore, that the following claims cover all such modifications and variations that may fall within the true sprit and scope of the invention.
Claims
- 1. A former assembly, comprising:a stainless steel wing having a curved edge and a concave surface, the concave surface having substantially plain periodic openings; a stainless steel tube having a curved edge coupled to the curved edge of the wing to form a crown, a substantially straight edge and a surface having periodic openings; and a stainless steel base coupled to the substantially straight edge of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging machine.
- 2. The former assembly of claim 1, further comprising an anodized aluminum cross-bar coupled to the base distal to the tube, the cross-bar substantially parallel to the plane of the base and adapted to couple to a packaging system.
- 3. The former assembly of claim 2, further comprising:an anodized aluminum top-plate substantially parallel to the plane of the cross-bar and adapted to couple to a packaging system; and a plurality of anodized aluminum spacers that couple the cross-bar to the top-plate.
- 4. The former assembly of claim 3, wherein each of the cross-bar and top-plate have at least one region from which material comprising the cross-bar and top-plate has been removed to form a pocket.
- 5. The former assembly of claim 1 further comprising a secondary product inlet coupled to the tube and adapted to allow material to be introduced into a package formed by the former.
- 6. The former assembly of claim 1 wherein the wing comprises 2-WL rigidized stainless steel.
- 7. The former assembly of claim 1, wherein the tube has a cross-section selected from the group consisting of a circle, an ellipse, a rectangle and a square.
- 8. A former, comprising:a wing having a curved edge and a concave source, the concave surface having substantially plain periodic openings; a tube having a curved edge coupled to the curved edge of the wing to form a crown, a substantially straight edge and a surface; and a base coupled to the substantially straight edge of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging machine.
- 9. The former of claim 8, wherein the wing comprises 2-WL rigidized stainless steel.
- 10. The former of claim 8, wherein the tube surface has periodic openings.
- 11. The former of claim 8, wherein the tube comprises stainless steel.
- 12. The former of claim 8, further comprising a cross-bar coupled to the base distal from the tube, the cross-bar substantially parallel to the plane of the base and adapted to couple to a packaging system.
- 13. The former of claim 12, wherein the cross-bar comprises anodized stainless steel.
- 14. The former of claim 12, wherein the cross-bar has at least one region from which material comprising the cross-bar has been removed to form a pocket.
- 15. The former of claim 12, further comprising:a top-plate coupled to the wing and substantially parallel to the plane of the cross-bar; and a plurality of spacers that couple the cross-bar to the top-plate.
- 16. The former of claim 15, wherein the top-plate has at least one region from which material comprising the top-plate has been removed to form a pocket.
- 17. The former of claim 15, wherein the cross-bar and the spacers comprise anodized aluminum.
- 18. The former of claim 8, wherein the tube has a cross-section selected from the group consisting of a circle, an ellipse, a rectangle and a square.
- 19. A former, comprising:a wing having a concave surface with substantially plain periodic openings; a tube coupled to the wing along a first edge to form a crown; and a base coupled to the tube along a second edge of the tube and conforming substantially to the shape of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging system.
- 20. The former of claim 19, wherein the wing comprises 2-WL rigidized stainless steel.
- 21. The former of claim 19, wherein the tube further comprises periodic openings.
- 22. The former of claim 19, wherein the tube has a cross-section selected from the group consisting of a circle, an ellipse, a rectangle and a square.
- 23. The former of claim 19, wherein the tube and the base comprise stainless steel.
- 24. The former of claim 19, further comprising a secondary product inlet coupled to the tube.
US Referenced Citations (8)