Lightweight former and former assembly

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6589147
  • Patent Number
    6,589,147
  • Date Filed
    Saturday, September 8, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 8, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A former whose wing component incorporates periodic openings, a tube component (that may, or may not, incorporate periodic openings) and a base component (that is shaped to conform substantially to the former's tube geometry) is described. Such a former, may be significantly less heavy than prior art formers (for a given size package) while simultaneously providing improved performance and durability. A former assembly that includes the former, a cross-bar, a top-plate and spacers is also described. Each of the cross-bar, top-plate and spacers may use aluminum and/or incorporate hollowed pockets to further reduce the assemblies weight.
Description




BACKGROUND




The invention relates generally to product packaging systems and, more particularly but not by way of limitation, to a bag former and former assembly for use in a packaging system.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, a product packaging system


100


comprising three major components: the product


105


to be packaged; packaging material


110


from which packages are formed; and former


115


. Product


105


may comprise virtually any material including, for example, liquids, powders, solids and bulk material. Package material


110


is typically a thin film with text and graphics that identify the product (e.g., potato chips or coffee) and supplier (e.g., Company XYZ). Former


115


is an assembly that manipulates package material


110


into the desired shape (e.g., a rectangular or elliptical bag) and forms the package's seal, while the packaging system itself provides the product and actually seals package material


110


to form an enclosed volume (packages


120


).





FIG. 2

shows a typical prior art longitudinal-type packaging system


200


. As shown, product


105


and packaging material


110


is introduced to former


115


where material


110


is shaped and aligned by wing


205


to conform about product filing tube


210


and to form a seam. The seam is longitudinally sealed by sealing device


215


so that material


110


forms a cylinder


220


. Feeding device


225


pulls packaging material


110


(specifically cylinder


220


) downward so that sealing/cutting device


230


seals cylinder


220


to form product package


120


.




For economic reasons, it is important that packaging systems such as


100


and


200


operate at high speeds and for long periods of time. This, in turn, requires that former


115


be constructed of material that is mechanically strong (e.g., rigid), extremely wear resistant, not susceptible to corrosion and presents low resistance to packaging material


110


. The latter is important because as packaging material


110


is pulled over wing


205


component wear can, over time, result in a former


115


that creates uneven seams or wrinkles, creases or tears packaging material


110


as it is pulled over the wing's


205


surface.




Former


115


is typically designed to produce a package having a predetermined size and shape. For example, a first former may be designed to produce rectangular bags having a width of four (4) inches for use in small snack or candy products. A second former may be designed to produce elliptical bags having a width of eight (8) inches for use with breakfast cereal products. Still another former may be designed to produce bags having a width of twenty four (24) inches to package industrial/commercial frozen food. Accordingly, when a different size package (for the same or a different product) is needed, former


115


is replaced by a different former designed to produce a package having the new/correct size. For the reasons discussed above, typical former assemblies are fabricated out of solid stainless steel and, as a result, are quite heavy. Thus, it is often difficult for a worker to change the former because of the former's weight. Large formers often require multiple personnel or a small crane to change. This, in turn, reduces the amount of time the packaging system can be used to package product. This is especially true for larger formers such as those used to package, for example, industrial food packages (e.g., commercial-size containers of frozen foods).




Thus, it would be beneficial to provide a former that is wear and corrosion resistant, presents low friction to packaging material and yet is significantly lighter than current formers.




SUMMARY




In one embodiment the invention provides a former that includes a wing having a concave surface with periodic openings, a tube coupled to the wing along a first edge to form a crown and a base coupled to the tube along a second edge of the tube and conforming substantially to the shape of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging system. The tube may be designed to facilitate fabrication of substantially any shape package such as, for example, a rectangle, a square, a circle or an ellipse. In another embodiment of the invention, the tube includes periodic openings. In yet another embodiment of the invention, the former may include a cross-bar (coupled to the base and adapted to attach to a packaging system), a top-plate (coupled to the wing substantially parallel to the plane of the cross-bar and adapted to attach to a packaging system) and spacers that interconnect the cross-bar and top-plate. The wing may be fabricated from 2-WL rigidized stainless steel, the tube and base from stainless steel and the cross-bar, top-plate and spacers from anodized aluminum or other lightweight material. In addition, the cross-bar and top-plates may incorporate hollowed-out regions. Finally, a former in accordance with the invention may include a secondary product inlet to allow the introduction of additional material (other than the primary product) into a package formed by the former.




A former in accordance with the invention may be substantially less heavy than a prior art former designed to fabricate the same package while simultaneously providing improved operating performance, vis a vis the ability to generate packages with uniform seams, and equal or improved durability.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

shows a block diagram of a product packaging system.





FIG. 2

shows a longitudinal-type packaging system.





FIG. 3

shows an isometric view of a former in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 4A through 4C

show engineering-style diagrams for the former of FIG.


3


. (All measures are in inches.)





FIGS. 5A through 5C

show engineering-style diagrams for a prior art former. (All measures are in inches.)





FIGS. 6A and 6B

show a former assembly in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

show engineering style diagrams for the cross-bar component of FIG.


6


. (All measures are in inches.)





FIGS. 8A and 8B

show engineering style diagrams for the top-plate component of FIG.


6


. (All measures are in inches.)











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




A lightweight former and former assembly is described. The following embodiments of the invention are illustrative only and are not to be considered limiting in any respect.




In accordance with one embodiment of the invention (see FIG.


3


), former


300


comprises wing


305


having periodic openings


310


therein, tube


315


having periodic openings


320


therein and base ring


325


. In combination, wing


305


, tube


315


and base ring


325


provide a former that is significantly less heavy than prior art formers while simultaneously providing superior performance (e.g., the ability to generate packages with uniform seams) and that is at least equal in terms of durability.




Wing


305


is conformed into a standard shape to guide packaging material along surface


330


, over crown


335


and down tube


315


. (Product is typically supplied to a formed package through a product supply tube located “inside” tube


315


, not shown in

FIG. 3.

) Periodic openings


310


not only reduce the weight of wing


305


, they can also improve its operating performance by reducing the drag (friction) experienced by packaging material being drawn over the wing. Reduced drag, in turn, reduces the wear experienced by former


300


which, ultimately, allows former


300


to form more consistently uniform seals for a longer period than prior art formers. Periodic openings


310


provide reduced drag through at least two mechanisms. First, periodic openings


310


reduce drag by reducing the amount of surface area over which packaging material is drawn. Second, periodic openings


310


allow air to flow from the wing's under-side (that side facing tube


315


) toward surface


330


creating a cushion of air on which packaging material may “float” as it is drawn into former


300


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 3

, substantially all of surface


330


is dimpled with a pattern


345


that further facilitates the movement of packaging material. In one embodiment, wing


305


is constructed of 2-WL rigidized stainless steel. Other dimpling patterns, or no dimpling pattern, may also be used. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that periodic openings


310


may be formed using various shapes. For example, circles, ellipses, squares and rectangle openings may also be used. In addition, periodic openings


310


could encompass more or less of wing surface than shown in FIG.


3


. An important aspect of periodic openings


310


is that they are sufficiently numerous as to reduce the wing's weight and improve its operating characteristics, but not so numerous as to adversely effect (i.e., reduce) the wing's strength and rigidity. Both wing strength and rigidity are important to ensure that packaging material flows evenly, smoothly and uniformly over the wing.




Tube


315


couples to wing


305


on one edge, forming crown


335


, and to base ring


325


along a second edge. Periodic openings


320


reduce the tube's weight and the drag experienced by packaging material as it is drawn around the tube during package formation (compared to prior are former tubes). Thus, periodic openings


320


are used for the same purposes, provide the same benefits (reduced weight and improved operational performance), and have the same limitations regarding strength and rigidity as do periodic openings


310


in wing


305


.




Base ring


325


is coupled to tube


315


to provide a substantive base for and is further coupled to a folded flap of wing


305


to provide additional rigidity (see below for a discussion of element


430


in FIG.


4


A). Base ring


325


further allows former


300


to be coupled to a packaging systems through any convenient means such as, for example, bolts via bolt-holes


355


. Base rings in accordance with the invention are formed into a shape complementary to the shape of the package to be formed (in

FIG. 3

, a cylinder having a circular cross-section) and are only as substantive as needed to provide structural stability and coupling to a packaging system. In prior art formers, the base element is typically a large rectangular plate and is substantially more massive than that of base ring


325


.




In one embodiment, wing


305


, tube


315


and base ring


325


are manufactured from stainless steel. Periodic openings


310


and


320


are fabricated via laser cutting techniques. Crown


335


is formed by soldering using high silver content solder, and tube


315


is coupled to base ring


325


by welding. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other materials, fabrication techniques and coupling materials could be used. For example, a composite material rather than a metal could be used in one or more of the wing, tube and base ring elements. In addition, periodic openings could be applied to wing


305


and not to tube


315


, or versa visa. Further, periodic openings could be formed using water jet, stamping, milling or such other techniques as may be desired or feasible depending upon the material used for the underlying element (wing, tube or base ring).





FIGS. 4A through 4C

show engineering-style diagrams for a former in accordance with

FIG. 3

that has been designed to produce a package having a 9.646 inch width. Referring to

FIG. 4A

, wing


400


is manufactured from 24 gauge 2-WL rigidized stainless steel and periodic openings


405


are restricted to a specified region of the wing element. Referring now to

FIG. 4B

, tube


410


is manufactured from 16 gauge stainless steel and periodic openings


415


are restricted to the center portion of its surface. Finally,

FIG. 4C

shows base ring


420


having a substantially circular shape (conforming to the shape of tube


410


) and includes three (3) bolt holes


425


to allow coupling to a packaging system. The region denoted in

FIG. 4A

as


430


is folded (along the horizontal dashed line) and attached to tube


410


to provide additional rigidity to the former.




By comparison, a prior art former designed to produce the same size packages as the former of

FIGS. 3 and 4

are shown in

FIGS. 5A through 5C

. Referring to

FIG. 5A

, wing


500


is manufactured from 24 gauge 2-WL rigidized stainless steel and has no periodic openings. Referring now to

FIG. 5B

, tube


505


is manufactured from 16 gauge stainless steel and, similarly, has no periodic openings. A comparison of prior art tube


505


and tube


410


, shows a tube in accordance with the invention may also have a notch at that edge not used to form the crown (i.e., the edge not coupled to the wing). This notching further reduces the weight of a former in accordance with the invention over prior art formers. Finally,

FIG. 5C

shows prior art base plate


510


incorporating bolt holes


515


that may be used to connect it to a packaging system. Prior art base plate


510


is substantially larger than base ring


420


in accordance with the invention. Combined, prior art wing


500


, tube


505


and base plate


510


may be so significantly heavy that base plate


510


includes holes


520


for attachments to allow a small crane to move the former. While a comparison of

FIGS. 4 and 5

highlight the structural differences between a former in accordance with the invention and a prior art former, they do not show the improved performance (through reduced drag) and longer life (through reduced wear) afforded by a former in accordance with the invention.




Referring to

FIGS. 6A and 6B

, one embodiment of a former assembly in accordance with the invention includes the basic former (see

FIGS. 4A-4C

) and cross-bar


600


, spacers


605


, top-plate


610


, secondary product inlet


615


, and product tube


620


. Secondary product inlet


615


provides a means to introduce a secondary product into the package formed by former (comprising wing


400


, tube


410


and base


420


) such as, for example, a product coupon, a toy or a gaseous material (e.g., nitrogen). Product tube


620


provides a mechanism to deposit the product being packaged into the package. As shown in

FIGS. 7 and 8

, cross-bar


600


and top-plate


605


may incorporate hollow regions


700


and


800


that are designed to reduce the component's weight without adversely affecting its strength and rigidity. To further reduce weight over prior art former assemblies (typically fabricated using solid stainless steel), cross-bar


600


and top-plate


610


may be comprised of aluminum and, in particular, anodized aluminum. Similarly, spacers


605


may be fabricated from aluminum or anodized aluminum. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that a former assembly may include a former only (see FIGS.


3


and


4


), a former with one or more cross-bars


600


, or a former with one or more cross-bars


600


, a plurlaity of spacers


605


and one or more top-plates


610


.




Table 1 shows the weight difference for the different elements of a former assembly made in accordance with the invention as compared to a comparable prior art former assembly. The weights listed in Table 1 correspond to a former assembly designed to produce a package having a 9.646 inch width and using the materials described with respect to

FIGS. 4 and 6

. The prior art former assembly is one designed for an identical package, but using industry standard solid stainless steel components.












TABLE 1











Weight Comparison Between an Illustrative Former Assembly In






accordance with the invention and a Prior Art Former Assembly















Weight of









Inventive




Weight of Prior Art




Weight Saved By






Component




Embodiment (lbs)




Embodiment (lbs)




Invention (%)

















Former




3.8




8.6




55.8






Cross-Bar




3.0




4.4




31.8






Spacers




2.8




8.0




65.0






Top-Plate




10.8




14.4




25.0






Total




20.4




35.4




42.4














It is emphasized that not only does the invention result is a significantly less heavy former/former assembly than prior art techniques, but also a former that provides significantly improved performance and durability (see discussion above regarding FIG.


3


).




While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, numerous modifications and variations will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. For instance, a former in accordance with one embodiment of the invention may incorporate periodic openings in the wing only, the tube only, or a combination thereof. In addition, a former in accordance with one embodiment of the invention may include more, or fewer, periodic openings than that illustrated in the embodiment of

FIGS. 3

,


4


and


6


. Further, a former in accordance with another embodiment of the invention may include a means of introducing a secondary product into the package formed by the former. One example secondary product is a food coupon. A second example of a secondary product is a small toy. It is intended, therefore, that the following claims cover all such modifications and variations that may fall within the true sprit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A former assembly, comprising:a stainless steel wing having a curved edge and a concave surface, the concave surface having substantially plain periodic openings; a stainless steel tube having a curved edge coupled to the curved edge of the wing to form a crown, a substantially straight edge and a surface having periodic openings; and a stainless steel base coupled to the substantially straight edge of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging machine.
  • 2. The former assembly of claim 1, further comprising an anodized aluminum cross-bar coupled to the base distal to the tube, the cross-bar substantially parallel to the plane of the base and adapted to couple to a packaging system.
  • 3. The former assembly of claim 2, further comprising:an anodized aluminum top-plate substantially parallel to the plane of the cross-bar and adapted to couple to a packaging system; and a plurality of anodized aluminum spacers that couple the cross-bar to the top-plate.
  • 4. The former assembly of claim 3, wherein each of the cross-bar and top-plate have at least one region from which material comprising the cross-bar and top-plate has been removed to form a pocket.
  • 5. The former assembly of claim 1 further comprising a secondary product inlet coupled to the tube and adapted to allow material to be introduced into a package formed by the former.
  • 6. The former assembly of claim 1 wherein the wing comprises 2-WL rigidized stainless steel.
  • 7. The former assembly of claim 1, wherein the tube has a cross-section selected from the group consisting of a circle, an ellipse, a rectangle and a square.
  • 8. A former, comprising:a wing having a curved edge and a concave source, the concave surface having substantially plain periodic openings; a tube having a curved edge coupled to the curved edge of the wing to form a crown, a substantially straight edge and a surface; and a base coupled to the substantially straight edge of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging machine.
  • 9. The former of claim 8, wherein the wing comprises 2-WL rigidized stainless steel.
  • 10. The former of claim 8, wherein the tube surface has periodic openings.
  • 11. The former of claim 8, wherein the tube comprises stainless steel.
  • 12. The former of claim 8, further comprising a cross-bar coupled to the base distal from the tube, the cross-bar substantially parallel to the plane of the base and adapted to couple to a packaging system.
  • 13. The former of claim 12, wherein the cross-bar comprises anodized stainless steel.
  • 14. The former of claim 12, wherein the cross-bar has at least one region from which material comprising the cross-bar has been removed to form a pocket.
  • 15. The former of claim 12, further comprising:a top-plate coupled to the wing and substantially parallel to the plane of the cross-bar; and a plurality of spacers that couple the cross-bar to the top-plate.
  • 16. The former of claim 15, wherein the top-plate has at least one region from which material comprising the top-plate has been removed to form a pocket.
  • 17. The former of claim 15, wherein the cross-bar and the spacers comprise anodized aluminum.
  • 18. The former of claim 8, wherein the tube has a cross-section selected from the group consisting of a circle, an ellipse, a rectangle and a square.
  • 19. A former, comprising:a wing having a concave surface with substantially plain periodic openings; a tube coupled to the wing along a first edge to form a crown; and a base coupled to the tube along a second edge of the tube and conforming substantially to the shape of the tube and further adapted to couple to a packaging system.
  • 20. The former of claim 19, wherein the wing comprises 2-WL rigidized stainless steel.
  • 21. The former of claim 19, wherein the tube further comprises periodic openings.
  • 22. The former of claim 19, wherein the tube has a cross-section selected from the group consisting of a circle, an ellipse, a rectangle and a square.
  • 23. The former of claim 19, wherein the tube and the base comprise stainless steel.
  • 24. The former of claim 19, further comprising a secondary product inlet coupled to the tube.
US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
2969627 Leasure Jan 1961 A
2982334 Cooper et al. May 1961 A
3042103 McDevitt et al. Jul 1962 A
3486424 Tanner Dec 1969 A
3636826 Bowen et al. Jan 1972 A
3935048 Rucker Jan 1976 A
4532754 Hokanson Aug 1985 A
4950345 Kreager et al. Aug 1990 A