Lightweight polymer wine bottle suitable for use with natural cork or synthetic stoppers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12012253
  • Patent Number
    12,012,253
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 31, 2023
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 18, 2024
    6 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Verre Vert, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Romanowski; Michael C
    Agents
    • Ascenda Law Group, PC
Abstract
A container for alcohol, e.g., a wine bottle, formed of a polymer wall has a body that terminates in a base, a shoulder, and a neck, the shoulder forming a tapered region between the neck and the body, and the neck terminating in a finish. The polymer wall is sufficiently thick to withstand extraction forces, one hour after capping, of between 12 and 40 daN when a natural cork stopper is used and between 10 and 45 daN when a synthetic stopper is used.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to packaging for alcoholic beverages, such as wine, and in particular to bottles that are fabricated from lightweight polymers and adapted to receive natural cork stoppers.


BACKGROUND

Packaging for premium alcoholic beverages, such as wine, traditionally comes in the form of glass bottles that are chemically compatible with alcohol and which have aesthetic and other appealing characteristics to consumers. Glass has long been used for such applications, in part because of its chemical compatibility, low oxygen transfer, and overall suitability for long term storage. Additionally, consumers have come to associate natural cork stoppers with premium wines and glass bottles are used, in part, because of their ability to receive and accommodate such stoppers. However, the weight and fragility of glass bottles makes them imperfect containers for these uses.


Polymeric alternatives to glass bottles have been developed. For example, wine bottles made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are known and offer some advantages (in terms of weight and resistance to breakage) over traditional glass bottles. The present applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 10,894,625 describes such a wine bottle; in particular, one that includes coatings on its interior and exterior surfaces that inhibit the ingress of oxygen.


However, commercially available PET wine bottle have, to date, been limited to the use of screw-top stoppers. While blind taste studies have shown that most consumers are unable to distinguish between wines stored in screw-top bottles from those using natural cork stoppers, many consumers will refuse to purchase wines in screw-top bottles because they believe those wines to be inferior to those using traditional natural cork stoppers. Similar preferences for natural cork stoppers over synthetic cork stoppers have also been observed. Moreover, many wines benefit from in-bottle aging through exposure to small amounts of oxygen introduced through natural cork stoppers. Over many years of experience with using such stoppers, wine makers have crafted their maturation and blending processes to account for their use.


This has put existing PET and other polymeric bottles at a disadvantage. Such bottles are generally unable to meet the demands associated with the use of natural (or synthetic) cork stoppers. For example, during uncorking, the release of the cork stopper from the bottle is accompanied by a sudden loss of pressurization within the bottle, and this loss of pressurization has caused the walls of PET and other polymeric bottles to recede inward, causing the wine (or other contents) of the bottle to overflow the container. And, commercial bottling lines typically utilize corking machines that first set the cork in the bottle and then tamp the cork flush with the finish by applying pressure. Some existing PET and other polymeric bottles have collapsed under the application of such pressure, making them unsuitable for such applications.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present inventors have recognized there exists an unmet need for a lightweight, durable, rigid container that has high aesthetic appeal and allows for the use of natural cork or synthetic stoppers.


In one embodiment, a wine bottle configured in accordance with the present invention has a body that terminates in a base, a shoulder, and a neck, the shoulder forming a tapered region between the neck and the body, and the neck terminating in a finish. The wine bottle is characterized by the body, base, shoulder, neck, and finish being made of a polymer wall, which wall is sufficiently thick to withstand extraction forces, one hour after capping, of between 10 and 45 daN, and in some cases between 12 and 40 daN, when a natural cork stopper is used, and between 10 and 45 daN when a synthetic stopper is used.


By way of example, the wine bottle may be made of a polymer wall consisting of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and/or recycled PET (rPET). Where the wine bottle has a volume of approximately 750 ml at its fill point, the polymer wall may have a thickness over the length of the body of 0.5-2 mm, and preferably approximately 1.3 mm, average, and a thickness over the length of the neck of 3.5-6.8 mm. The the neck including the finish may be 35-70 mm long and have an interior diameter of 17.75-20 mm as measured at or near a top of the finish and 17-18.5 mm at or near the junction with the shoulder. Alternatively, the neck including the finish may be of sufficient length to accommodate a stopper approximately 30-53 mm long, with a headspace sufficient to allow for expansion of wine within said bottle at temperatures above 20° C. without a pressure in the bottle rising above 1 bar. The polymer wall may have an interior coating, e.g., of an oxide of silicon, of a thickness between 1 nm and 100 μm, inclusive. The wine bottle may have a material weight (that is, an unfilled weight) of 70-300 grams.


Still another embodiment of the invention provides a wine bottle having a body that terminates in a base, a shoulder, and a neck, with the shoulder forming a tapered region between the neck and the body, and the neck terminating in a finish. The body, base, shoulder, neck, and finish may be made of a polymer wall, e.g., PET and/or rPET, and the wine bottle has a volume of approximately 750 ml at its fill point. The polymer wall has a thickness over the length of the body of approximately 1-1.7 mm on average and weighs approximately 150-160 grams.


Further embodiments of the invention are described in detail below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a wine bottle having a polymer wall and an interior coating in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates a further example of a wine bottle having a polymer wall in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, and highlights details of the neck and finish area of the bottle.



FIG. 3 illustrates yet another example of a wine bottle having a polymer wall in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, and highlights details of the neck and finish area of the bottle.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Described herein are embodiments of packaging for alcoholic beverages, such as wine. In one embodiment, the packaging is in the form of a bottle fabricated from a lightweight polymer, which is coated so as to prevent the ingress of oxygen. Referring to FIG. 1, in one particular embodiment a wine bottle 10 configured in accordance with the invention has a body 12 that terminates in a base 24, which may or may not include a punt (not shown), a shoulder 20, and a neck 16. The shoulder 20 forms a tapered region between the neck 16 and the body 12. Taper dimensions and shapes may vary for different bottle shapes, including bottle shapes traditionally associated with wines from Burgundy, Bordeaux, and elsewhere. The neck 16 terminates in a finish 18. Some or all of the body 12, base 24 (including a heel 14), shoulder 20, neck 16, and finish 18 are made of a clear, blow molding grade polymer wall 22, such as PET or recycled PET (rPET), having an interior coating 28. Interior coating 28 may be a coating made of an oxide of silicon (generally SiOx), for example, SiO2, or so-called “liquid glass.” Other coatings may also be used provided that the material used for the coating should be generally impermeable to gas diffusion, oxygen in particular, and volatile compounds. The coating is preferably applied by plasma impulse chemical vapor deposition, in which a gas mixture is introduced into the bottle and ignited by microwaves to create a cold plasma that forms the interior coating, however, other coating processes may be used. The interior coating 28 may have a thickness between 1 nm and 100 μm, inclusive, and preferably 100 nm to 30 μm, inclusive. In still further embodiments, wine bottle 10 may be fashioned from one or more of polysulfone (PSU), polypropylene (PP), or glycol-modified polyethylene terephthalate (PETG). Another alternative material for wine bottle 10 is the Eastar Copolymer EB062, a copolymer based on PETG that is manufactured by the Eastman Chemical Company and has superior recyclability and chemical/mechanical properties to PET and PETG. Copolymers, blends, and mixtures of the preceding materials may also be used.


The present invention addresses various ones of the issues described above and provides a lightweight bottle for long-term storage of premium alcoholic beverages. The bulk of the bottle is made up of a polymer, e.g., PET or rPET, while the interior of the bottle is coated with a thin (e.g., preferably, between 1 nm and 100 μm thick) film of a passive barrier to (i) limit oxygen transfer into the bottle, (ii) limit the transfer of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) out of the bottle, and (iii) provide chemically compatibility with the acidic conditions associated with alcoholic beverages contained in the bottle. The exterior of the bottle may or may not be similarly coated by a thin film of the material of similar thickness. In various embodiments, bottles fabricated in accordance with embodiments of the invention weigh less than 300 grams, or even less than 200 grams, and preferably 150-160 grams or less (e.g., 70-130 grams) for a 750 ml bottle (as measured at its fill point), as compared to 500 grams for a conventional 750 ml glass wine bottle, are durable such that they can be shipped without insulating packaging material, and are suitable for long term storage of their contents (e.g., for time periods of 30-3650 days). In various embodiments, bottles fashioned in accordance with the present invention may have interior volumes ranging between approximately 0.187 to 3 liters at their fill points, with weights of such bottles varying accordingly, e.g., 30-300 grams. For Bordeaux-style or Burgundy-style bottles of approximately 750 ml at their fill points (e.g., bottles similar to those discussed in detail below), the bottles may have a material weight, that is, an unfilled weight, of 70-300 grams. Importantly, wine bottles configured in accordance with embodiments of the present invention have wall thicknesses sufficient to withstand pressures associated with corking of the bottle and to remain rigid, or nearly so, during uncorking.


In one embodiment, the polymer wall thickness of wine bottle 10 varies at different portions of the bottle. For example, the neck may have a varying thicknesses of approximately 3.5-6.8 mm at areas over its length, and the shoulder and body may have a thickness of approximately 0.5-2.5 mm on average, and more preferably 1-2 mm on average, and still more preferably 1.1-1.7 mm on average, over the length of the shoulder and body. The varying thicknesses of the different areas of the bottle allow the bottle to remain lighter than a conventional glass bottle while still providing structural support to allow for corking and uncorking.


A preferred wine bottle configured according to embodiments of the present invention is intended for storage of still wines having a level of carbonation below 1.2 grams per liter of liquid and for which over-pressure due to carbon dioxide is below one bar in a sealed bottle when kept at 20° C. The preferred wine bottle is made of PET or rPET, has a volume of approximately 750 ml at its fill point, a wall thickness of 0.5-2.5 mm on average, and preferably approximately 1-2 mm on average, and more preferably 1.1-1.7 mm on average over its body length, and 3.5-6.8 mm over its neck length, and a weight of approximately 80-160 grams, for example 150-160 grams. The neck, including the finish, may be 35-70 mm long, and preferably 40-65 mm long, with a minimum interior through bore of 17.5 mm. More generally, the neck is of sufficient length to accommodate a stopper, natural cork or synthetic cork, 30-53 mm long, and more preferably 44 mm long, with a headspace sufficient to allow for expansion of the wine at temperatures above 20° C. without the pressure in the bottle rising above 1 bar. In some cases, as discussed in greater detail below, the neck may have an interior diameter of 17.75-20 mm, and preferably 18.5-19.5 mm, as measured at or near the top of the finish (e.g., from the top to approximately 3-15 mm from the top of the finish), and 17-18.5 mm, and preferably 17.5-17.7 mm, at or near the junction with the shoulder (e.g., approximately 65 mm from the top of the finish). The preferred wine bottle is thus configured to withstand extraction forces (one hour after capping) of between 10 and 45 daN, and preferably between 12 and 40 daN, when a natural cork stopper is used and between 10 and 45 daN when a synthetic stopper is used. The preferred wine bottle is further configured to withstand corking when a compensation spring of initial force 100 daN, plus or minus 20 daN, is used.


For purposes of the present invention, natural cork stoppers suitable for use with the present wine bottles may have lengths of 38-54 mm, plus or minus 0.7 mm, and diameters of 24 mm, plus or minus 0.5 mm. In other instances, natural cork stoppers suitable for use with the present wine bottles may have lengths of may have lengths of 30-55 mm plus or minus 0.8 mm. Synthetic stoppers suitable for use with the present wine bottles may have lengths of 34-45 mm, plus or minus 0.3 mm, and diameters of 22.5-24 mm, plus or minus 0.3 mm. Diameters of the stopper should be appropriate for the diameter of the neck of the bottle and sufficient to provide adequate sealing against leakage. For example, a natural cork stopper for a bottle having an 18 mm diameter neck at the finish should be approximately 24 mm in diameter. Such a stopper will be compressed by about 6 mm when inserted into the bottle, thereby exerting a pressure of approximately 1-1.5 kg/cm2 against the neck. In other instances, synthetic stoppers suitable for use with the present wine bottles may have lengths of may have lengths of 30-45 mm plus or minus 0.5 mm.


In one example, bottle 10 is manufactured via a single-stage stretch blow molding process. In this process, pellets of PET and/or rPET are fed through a hopper and through an extruder to be melted. The molten material is then injected into a preform mold which is dimensioned so as to determine the dimensions of the neck and finish of the final bottle. A stretch rod is used to stretch the preform along its longitudinal dimension and pressurized air is blown into the cavity to form the bottle material to the walls of the mold. The completed bottle is then ejected from the mold and may undergo quality control tests to ensure it does not leak.


The single-stage process is different from a two-stage process in which the preforms are made and warehoused for later blowing into completed bottles. While the two-stage process may offer some efficiencies in terms of stockpiling, etc., the present inventors have observed that reheating of the preform as part of the separate blowing process may lead to bottles having wall parameters that fail to meet the above specifications necessary to withstand corking and uncorking processes, especially when natural cork stoppers are used. Nevertheless, in some instances a two-stage stretch blow molding process may be used. In the two-stage process, once the preforms are formed they are warehoused for later forming into the final bottle forms. This final bottle formation takes place after reheating of the preforms and the two stages of the process are performed similarly to the corresponding steps single-stage procedure discussed above.


Similarly, other suitable manufacturing processes that achieve the necessary wall dimensions mentioned herein may be used. For example, extrusion blow molding may be used. In extrusion blow molding, a preform is formed vertically and its wall thickness is varied by changing the size of an orifice through which the preform extrudes. The preform is then encased in a mold and the final bottle formed by a blowing process similar to that used in blow molding, followed by trimming of any unnecessary material.


As discussed above, the interior of the polymer bottle of the present invention is coated with a thin film. The material used for the coating should be generally impermeable to gas diffusion, oxygen in particular, and volatile compounds in the case of wine. Examples of barrier materials are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,300,541 (polyamide-polyepoxide coating) and 5,637,365 (epoxy-amine aryloxy/aryloate coating). There are many such coatings that have been developed commercially, including Bairocaide (available from PPG Industries of Pittsburgh, PA), EC-12 (available from Westcoat Specialty Coating Systems of San Diego, CA), Nanolok (available from InMat Inc. of Hillsborough Township, NJ), HydroPhil (available from Lotus Leaf Coatings, Inc. of Albuquerque, NM), Hydak (available from Biocoat, Inc. of Horsham, PA), and NanoScal nanotechnology coating (available from NanoScal or Conroe, TX). These commercially available coatings vary in their chemical compositions. Coatings manufactured of SiOx are often used, and are one preferred coating for use with the present wine bottles, because they are chemically similar to glass. Market research indicates that beverage manufacturers are most trusting of SiOx coatings, also referred to as “liquid glass coatings,” rather than other types of coatings. Liquid glass coatings have been employed in a number of other industries including health care and automotive as a means to protect surfaces from tarnishing or corrosion. Preferably the coating should be colorless and nearly imperceptible to the human eye. The coating should be applied at a minimum to the entire interior of the bottle, in a thin continuous layer ranging from 100 nm to 30 μm. The coating may be applied in any of many methods, preferably the plasma process described above, but spraying, dipping or painting could also be used.


Bottles fashioned in accordance with the present invention may be transparent (e.g., with an optical transparency within 10% of that of glass) or translucent, and may be one of a number of colors commonly used in the premium alcohol industry, for example deaf leaf green, antique green, champagne green, or flint.


For the storage of wine, the design of the polymer bottle is of particular importance. Wine bottles are commonly produced in one of three shapes: Burgundy, Bordeaux, or Riesling. The shape of the bottle is important both for consumer appeal and for maintaining compatibility with existing bottling lines. However, in cases where wine bottle 10 does not include a punt, maintaining traditional bottle dimensions would result in a lowering of the fill line. The location of the fill line is important because it defines how much oxygen is in the bottle when it is corked. Removing the punt and keeping the fill line, while maintaining compatibility with existing bottling lines, makes the bottle design for polymer manufacturing non-trivial. Moreover, employing thinner walls than the typical glass bottle further reduces the fill line given fixed outer bottle dimensions.


For example, in one embodiment a bottle configured in accordance with the present invention which is intended for use in connection with Burgundy-style wines maintains an appropriately located fill line despite the absence of a punt and the presence thinner walls than those associated with glass wine bottles. The design is reflected in the illustration shown in FIG. 1 and it will be appreciated that the taper of the bottle begins lower down on the bottle and is, at least initially, shallower than on a typical Burgundy wine bottle. The outer diameter of the bottle is reduced slightly from a typical Burgundy wine bottle. In one embodiment, the bottle has an overall height of 290.53 mm, and an overall width (at the body) of 79.4 mm. The body is 130.5 mm tall and the neck is 37.23 mm tall. The shoulders have an inside radius of 101 mm at the junction with the body, and an outside radius of 200 mm tapering towards the neck. The foregoing dimensions and the others discussed herein are approximate and, generally, are within a tolerance of +/−3% of the specified dimension.



FIG. 2 illustrates another example of a wine bottle 30 configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Wine bottle 30 is similar to wine bottle 10 described above and has a body 12 that terminates in a base 24, but this base includes a punt 26, which in one embodiment is approximately 19.3-20.7 mm, and preferably approximately 20 mm, deep at its maximum point. Wine bottle 30 also includes a shoulder 20 and a neck 16 that terminates in a finish 18. The shoulder 20 forms a tapered region between the neck 16 and the body 12. Some or all of the body 12, base 24 (including heel 14), shoulder 20, neck 16, and finish 18 are made of a clear, blow molding grade polymer wall 22, such as PET or recycled PET (rPET), having an interior coating as discussed above. Wine bottle 30 is formed in a bottle shape traditionally associated with wines from Burgundy and in instances where wine bottle 30 has a volume of 750 ml bottle as measured at its fill point, approximately 63 mm from the top of the finish, has an overall height of 291.5-294.5 mm, and preferably 293 mm, and is, in one embodiment, fabricated via a single stage stretch blow molding process so as to weigh 150-160 grams or less (e.g., 70-130 grams). Others of the manufacturing processes described above may also be used.



FIG. 2 also highlights details of the neck and finish area of wine bottle 30. In this example, the neck has an interior minimum thru bore of 17.5 mm, and an interior diameter of 17.75-20 mm, and preferably 18.5-19.5 mm and, in one embodiment approximately 19 mm, as measured at or near the top of the finish, and 17-18.5 mm, and preferably 17.5-17.7 mm, as measured at or near the junction with the shoulder (e.g., approximately 65 mm from the top of the finish). Wall 22 has a thickness of 3.5-4.5 mm, and preferably approximately 4 mm, at the top of the finish, a thickness of 6.2-5.3 mm, and preferably approximately 5.75 mm, at neck support ring 32 (e.g., approximately 15 mm from the top of the finish), a thickness of 5.9-4.1 mm, and preferably approximately 5 mm, at a position approximately 45 mm from the top of the finish, and a thickness of 6.8-4.8 mm, and preferably approximately 5.8 mm, at or near the junction with the shoulder (e.g., approximately 65 mm from the top of the finish). In the body region, the wall has a thickness of approximately 0.5-2 mm on average, preferably 1-1.5 mm on average, and more preferably approximately 1.3 mm on average, over the length of the body. The neck is of sufficient length to accommodate a stopper, natural cork or synthetic cork. 38-53 mm long, and more preferably 44-45 mm long, with a headspace sufficient to allow for expansion of the wine at temperatures above 20° C. without the pressure in the bottle rising above 1 bar. Wine bottle 30 is thus configured to withstand extraction forces (one hour after capping) of between 10 and 45 daN, and preferably between 12 and 40 daN, when a natural cork stopper is used and between 10 and 45 daN when a synthetic stopper is used. Wine bottle 30 is further configured to withstand corking when a compensation spring of initial force 100 daN, plus or minus 20 daN, is used.



FIG. 3 illustrates another example of a wine bottle 40 configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Wine bottle 40 is similar to wine bottle 10 described above, and has a body 12 that terminates in a base 24, but as with wine bottle 30 this base includes a punt 26, which in one embodiment is approximately 19.3-20.7 mm, and preferably approximately 20 mm, deep at its maximum point. Wine bottle 40 also includes a shoulder 20 and a neck 16 that terminates in a finish 18. The shoulder 20 forms a tapered region between the neck 16 and the body 12. Some or all of the body 12, base 24 (including heel 14), shoulder 20, neck 16, and finish 18 are made of a clear, blow molding grade polymer wall 22, such as PET or recycled PET (rPET), having an interior coating as discussed above. Wine bottle 40 is formed in a bottle shape traditionally associated with wines from Bordeaux and in instances where wine bottle 40 has a volume of 750 ml bottle as measured at its fill point, approximately 63 mm from the top of the finish, has an overall height of 299-302 mm, and preferably 300.5 mm, and is, in one embodiment, fabricated via a single stage stretch blow molding process so as to weigh 150-160 grams or less (e.g., 80-130 grams). Others of the manufacturing processes described above may also be used.



FIG. 3 also highlights details of the neck and finish area of wine bottle 40. In this example, the neck has an interior minimum thru bore of 17.5 mm, and an interior diameter of 17.75-20 mm, and preferably 18.5-19 mm, and, in one embodiment approximately 19 mm, as measured at or near the top of the finish, and 17-18.5 mm, and preferably 17.5-17.7 mm, as measured at or near the junction with the shoulder (e.g., approximately 65 mm from the top of the finish). Wall 22 has a thickness of 3.5-4.5 mm, and preferably approximately 4 mm, at the top of the finish, a thickness of 6.2-5.3 mm, and preferably approximately 5.75 mm, at neck support ring 32 (e.g., approximately 15 mm from the top of the finish), a thickness of 5.9-4.1 mm, and preferably approximately 5 mm, at a position approximately 45 mm from the top of the finish, and a thickness of 6.8-4.8 mm, and preferably approximately 5.8 mm, at or near the junction with the shoulder (e.g., approximately 65 mm from the top of the finish). In the body region, the wall has a thickness of approximately 0.5-2 mm on average, preferably 1-1.7 mm on average, and more preferably approximately 1.3 mm on average, over the length of the body. The neck is of sufficient length to accommodate a stopper, natural cork or synthetic cork, 38-53 mm long, and more preferably 44-45 mm long, with a headspace sufficient to allow for expansion of the wine at temperatures above 20° C. without the pressure in the bottle rising above 1 bar. Wine bottle 40 is thus configured to withstand extraction forces (one hour after capping) of between 10 and 45 daN, and preferably between 12 and 40 daN, when a natural cork stopper is used and between 10 and 45 daN when a synthetic stopper is used. Wine bottle 40 is further configured to withstand corking when a compensation spring of initial force 100 daN, plus or minus 20 daN, is used.


Experiments were conducted to ensure that bottles configured in accordance with embodiments of the present invention can withstand expected corking/uncorking forces. The experiments involved both Burgundy-style and Bordeaux-style bottles, similar to those illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, and Table 1, below, provides details concerning these samples. The Burgundy-style bottles had an average weight of approximately 155 grams, an overall height of approximately 293 mm, and an average fill point capacity of approximately 750 ml. The Bordeaux-style bottles had an average weight of approximately 157 grams, an overall height of approximately 300 mm, and an average fill point capacity of approximately 750 ml. Each of the samples were tested and determined to have a top load capacity in excess of 1000 N, which is deemed sufficient to withstand the corking and uncorking forces expected to be experienced. In Table 1, the reported wall thickness measurements represent averages of such measurements taken at each of a plurality of equally-spaced points around the circumference of the respective bottle at a specified measurement height from the bottom of the bottle, as indicated.









TABLE 2







Details for Sample Bottles Under Test


Burgundy-style Bottles










Measurement
Average wall



height
thickness at



from bottom of
measurement



bottle (approx.)
position (mm)





Sample 1
Body mid-line
1.16



Body lower one-third
1.41



Body lower one-fifth
1.51


Sample 2
Body mid-line
1.15



Body lower one-third
1.40



Body lower one-fifth
1.53


Sample 3
Body mid-line
1.13



Body lower one-third
1.40



Body lower one-fifth
1.51


Sample 4
Body mid-line
1.15



Body lower one-third
1.39



Body lower one-fifth
1.52







Bordeaux-style Bottles









Sample 1
Body mid-line
1.31



Body lower one-third
1.52



Body lower one-fifth
1.69


Sample 2
Body mid-line
1.33



Body lower one-third
1.55



Body lower one-fifth
1.71


Sample 3
Body mid-line
1.32



Body lower one-third
1.54



Body lower one-fifth
1.70


Sample 4
Body mid-line
1.32



Body lower one-third
1.54



Body lower one-fifth
1.69









In addition to the above tests and measurements, bottles having other wall thicknesses and weights were tested. In particular, bottles having wall thicknesses of 1 mm on average and weighing 131 grams and bottles having wall thicknesses of 0.8 mm on average and weighing 113 grams were tested. These bottles were observed to withstand corking and uncorking without deforming, although bottles having wall thicknesses less than 1 mm on average were observed to be deformable by hand. Additionally, Burgundy-style and Bordeaux style bottles with filled volumes of approximately 750 ml but having bottle material weights below 70 g would be unlikely to be able to withstand corking and uncorking forces.


As mentioned above, bottles configured in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may have volumes other than 750 ml. However, in order to ensure that such bottles withstand forces associated with corking and uncorking, as well as to be able to accommodate natural cork or synthetic stoppers of conventional sizes, such bottles, regardless of volume, are fabricated to have neck dimensions and neck wall thicknesses of the same dimensions mentioned above with respect to the 750 ml bottles discussed with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3. Moreover, although discussed with respect to specific instances of wine bottles, Bordeaux-style and Burgundy-style in particular, other wine bottle shapes, such as Champagne, Resiling (flûte), Hock, Port, Provence, Bocksbeutel, Chianti, Salmanazar, Jura, etc. may be fashioned according to the present invention. And, the present invention may be used for packaging for other alcoholic beverages, such as spirits, etc.


Thus, packaging for alcoholic beverages, such as wine, fabricated from a lightweight polymer, such as PET and/or rPET, has been described.

Claims
  • 1. A wine bottle having a body that terminates in a base, a shoulder, and a neck, the shoulder forming a tapered region between the neck and the body, and the neck terminating in a finish, said wine bottle characterized in that the body, base, shoulder, neck, and finish are made of a polymer wall consisting of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and/or recycled PET (rPET), wherein the wine bottle has a volume of approximately 750 ml at its fill point, and the polymer wall has a thickness over the length of the body of 0.5-2 mm and a thickness over the length of the neck of 3.5-6.8 mm with the thickness of the neck being greater at a junction with the shoulder than at the finish and approximately 4.1-5.9 mm at a position approximately 45 mm from the top of the finish, the neck being adapted to accommodate a stopper 38-53 mm long, and the neck having an interior diameter of 17.75-20 mm at or near a top of the finish and 17-18.5 mm at or near the junction with the shoulder.
  • 2. The wine bottle of claim 1, wherein the neck including the finish is 35-70 mm long.
  • 3. The wine bottle of claim 1, wherein the neck including the finish is approximately 65 mm long.
  • 4. The wine bottle of claim 1, wherein the neck including the finish is of sufficient length to accommodate a stopper approximately 30-55 mm long, with a headspace sufficient to allow for expansion of wine within said bottle at temperatures above 20° C. without a pressure in the bottle rising above 1 bar.
  • 5. The wine bottle of claim 1, wherein the polymer wall has an interior coating of a thickness between 1 nm and 100 μm, inclusive.
  • 6. The wine bottle of claim 5, wherein the interior coating is an oxide of silicon.
  • 7. The wine bottle of claim 1, wherein the bottle has a material weight of 70-300 grams.
  • 8. The wine bottle of claim 1, wherein the polymer wall has a thickness over the length of the body of approximately 1-1.7 mm on average and when unfilled the wine bottle weighs approximately 70-130 grams.
  • 9. The wine bottle of claim 8, wherein the wine bottle has a Bordeaux-style shape.
  • 10. The wine bottle of claim 8, wherein the wine bottle has a Burgundy-style shape.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a NONPROVISIONAL of, claims priority to, and incorporates by reference U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/488,060, filed 2 Mar. 2023.

US Referenced Citations (76)
Number Name Date Kind
3093507 Lander et al. Jun 1963 A
3282729 Richardson et al. Nov 1966 A
3415402 Webber Dec 1968 A
4282279 Strickland Aug 1981 A
4288478 Kinoshita et al. Sep 1981 A
4393106 Maruhashi et al. Jul 1983 A
4482586 Smith et al. Nov 1984 A
4564541 Taira et al. Jan 1986 A
4620639 Yoshino Nov 1986 A
4699809 Maruhashi et al. Oct 1987 A
4792488 Schirmer Dec 1988 A
4801078 Carlsson Jan 1989 A
4811849 Rausing Mar 1989 A
4816304 Nohara et al. Mar 1989 A
4818575 Hirata et al. Apr 1989 A
4836971 Denis Jun 1989 A
4980211 Kushida et al. Dec 1990 A
5021515 Cochran et al. Jun 1991 A
5084356 Deak et al. Jan 1992 A
5085821 Nohara Feb 1992 A
5122410 Lofgren et al. Jun 1992 A
5300541 Nugent, Jr. et al. Apr 1994 A
5637365 Carlblom Jun 1997 A
5688598 Keck et al. Nov 1997 A
5750226 MacAuley et al. May 1998 A
5800880 Laurent Sep 1998 A
5853830 McCaulley et al. Dec 1998 A
5858543 Futter et al. Jan 1999 A
5947310 Wagner Sep 1999 A
6013128 Hubbard et al. Jan 2000 A
6029837 Slat Feb 2000 A
6082563 Kohn et al. Jul 2000 A
6368686 Lofgren et al. Apr 2002 B1
6489386 Plotzker et al. Dec 2002 B1
6499311 Mahajan Dec 2002 B2
6641774 Slat et al. Nov 2003 B2
6676883 Hutchinson et al. Jan 2004 B2
6939591 Hutchinson et al. Sep 2005 B2
7214415 Tibbitt et al. May 2007 B2
7727605 Darr et al. Jun 2010 B2
8377530 Peters et al. Feb 2013 B2
10000405 Nemire Jun 2018 B2
10414077 Field Sep 2019 B2
10569924 Jarman Feb 2020 B2
10894625 Wilson Jan 2021 B1
11746185 Thompson Sep 2023 B2
20030031885 Shiau et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030087030 Hama et al. May 2003 A1
20030116525 Futral Jun 2003 A1
20030203143 Nagashima Oct 2003 A1
20030235667 Darr et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040031770 Gardner Feb 2004 A1
20050147776 Cheng Jul 2005 A1
20050247662 Esmond Nov 2005 A1
20060099362 Farha May 2006 A1
20060099363 Farha May 2006 A1
20080011706 Downing Jan 2008 A1
20080197100 Faulconnier Aug 2008 A1
20090220717 Wilczak et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090270555 Satoh et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090280268 Glukhoy et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090284421 Glukhoy et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100012617 Ulibarri Jan 2010 A1
20110120936 Escobar et al. May 2011 A1
20120012595 Yourist Jan 2012 A1
20130071649 Hanger et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130323423 Nakaya et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140130693 Sugasaki May 2014 A1
20150203222 Zonato Jul 2015 A1
20160185498 Henderson Jun 2016 A1
20160186309 Henderson Jun 2016 A1
20180265243 Gutekunst Sep 2018 A1
20190133358 Clyde May 2019 A1
20190161855 Kytzia et al. May 2019 A1
20200283185 Ritzen Sep 2020 A1
20220055786 Fournier Feb 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
8907337 May 1991 BR
3015446 Nov 2017 CA
0051443 Jan 1986 EP
1277661 Jan 2003 EP
1847507 Oct 2007 EP
2522588 Nov 2012 EP
3715500 Sep 2020 EP
1072162 May 2010 ES
2207439 Feb 1992 GB
H03275327 Dec 1991 JP
2001163370 Jun 2001 JP
2017159956 Sep 2017 JP
2018062378 Apr 2018 JP
2018-150076 Sep 2018 JP
20070078849 Aug 2007 KR
1998012127 Mar 1998 WO
2002049923 Jun 2002 WO
03014412 Feb 2003 WO
2006052659 May 2006 WO
WO 2009081029 Jul 2009 WO
2011140473 Nov 2011 WO
2017036866 Mar 2017 WO
WO 2018203146 Nov 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
“Guide to Wine Bottle Shapes”, Firstleaf, accessed online Oct. 2023, pp. 14-17, https://www.firstleaf.com/wine-school/article/guide-wine-bottle-shapes (Year: 2023).
“The Perfect Fit: Wine Bottle Dimensions for Shipping”, Hillebrand GORI, accessed online Oct. 2023, https://www.hillebrandgori.com/media/publication/wine-bottle-dimensions (Year: 2023).
“Bronco Wine Co. Introduces 750 mL PET Bottles for Its Leading Wine Brands”, Amcor Rigid Plastics, Oct. 18, 2015, https://www.amcor.com/media/news/b/bronco-wine-co-introduces-750ml-pet-bottles-for-its-leading-wine-brands (Year: 2015).
Amcor Rigid Plastics, “Lightweights for the American Wine Industry,” Jan. 13, 2012, 4 pgs.
Amcor Rigid Plastics, “Bronco Wine Co. Introduces 750ml PET Bottles for Its Leading Wine Brands,” Oct. 18, 2015, downloaded from: https://www.amcor.com/media/news/b/bronco-wine-co-introduces-750ml-pet-bottles-for-its-leading-wine-brands, 9 pgs.
Paben, Jared, “Company unveils RPET bottle with recycling-friendly barrier coating,” Plastics Recycling Update, Oct. 31, 2019, downloaded from: https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2019/10/31/company-unveils-rpet-bottle-with-recycling-friendly-barrier-coating/, 4 pgs.
Database WPI Week 200159, Thomson Scientific, London, GB, 2017 Clarivate Analytics, 1 pg.
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 4, 2021, from ISA/European Patent Office, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/064936 (filed Dec. 14, 2020), 18 pgs.
Cork Quality Council, “Bottling Handbook for Proper Closures,” 4 pgs (Jan. 2011).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63488060 Mar 2023 US