The invention relates to a novel sliding needle bar design and lightweight drive assembly useful in high speed tufting.
In the production of tufted fabrics, a plurality of spaced yarn carrying needles extend transversely across the machine and are reciprocated to penetrate and insert loops of yarn into a backing material fed longitudinally beneath the needles. The loops of yarn are seized or cut by gauge parts to create a cut pile, loop pile or cut loop pile surface. Several techniques have been developed to provide patterning in the resulting tufted fabrics including the use of yarn feeds that may control the feeding of single yarns on each penetration, precise control of the backing fabric, and lateral displacement of the backing material relative to the needles.
Almost every aspect of tufting has evolved over time to provide better and more diverse fabric-making capabilities, including yarn feed apparatus, lateral shifting mechanisms, gauge parts, and main yarn drives. For instance, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,366,761 and 5,193,472 depicting dual sliding or shiftable needle bar tufting mechanisms, rocking motion was provided by a rocker arm linkage to a main driveshaft to cause pushrods to reciprocally move a needle bar upward and downward to cause needles to penetrate the backing fabric. In some ways, this was an effective design because the main driveshaft did not require removal for routine adjustments, with adjustment to the needle stroke affected by working with readily accessible rocker arms. However, the use of rocker shafts imparted significant vibration to the tufting machines. More efficient designs such as using split cams in U.S. Pat. No. 5,320,053 or belt drives in U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,745 were introduced to provide for less vibration at higher speeds, while still permitting adjustments without the necessity of removing the main drive shaft.
Similarly, yarn feeds developed from simple roll type patterning attachments as in U.S. Pat. No. 2,966,866, to various electromagnetic scroll-type arrangements as in U.S. Pat. No. 3,847,098, and ultimately various servo motor driven yarn feeds as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,439,141 and 6,834,611, that have the capability to control each single end of yarn in each penetration. Sliding needle bar apparatus also evolved from cam-driven lateral shifters as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,026,830 and 3,301,205, to hydraulic shifters as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,173,192, to various servo motor driven linear actuators as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,979,344.
In each case, the advances in tufting technology must satisfy certain levels of adjustability, service access, and precision. Once these minimum characteristics of usability are satisfied, advances providing improved patterning capabilities and durability are preferred. It is also desired that the tufting machines operate at relatively higher speeds without incurring undue expense for the equipment or its operation. By way of reference, sliding needle bar apparatus transversely driven by cams and vertically driven by rocker shaft type assemblies, might have operated at only 300 to 500 stitches per minute. With a hydraulic shifting mechanism and a high-speed yarn drive, the shifted stitch rates might reasonably be increased to 600 to 800 reciprocations per minute. With servo driven linear actuator shifting and further improved main drive operation, shifted stitch rates of even 1200 stitches per minute have been obtainable.
As stitch rates become greater and greater, the vibrations set up within tufting machines also tend to increase. To address part of this problem, counter-balancing shaker apparatus have been developed as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,578,249 and deployed to excellent result. Even so, as unshifted tufting speeds approach 2000 stitches and shifted tufting speeds approach 1600 penetrations per minute, more effective machine operation can be achieved by further refining the structure and movement of the needle bar apparatus. The lateral forces imparted by transversely shifting a needle bar at stitch rates in the range of 1500 to 1600 stitches per inch may approach 15 g's. The forces acting upon the upward and downward reciprocation of the needles at 1500 to 2000 rpm may even exceed 60 g's. These G-forces are most easily countered when lighter weight needle apparatus is used.
To minimize both the physical stress and vibration inherent in such high-speed operation, it is desirable to reduce the weight of the transversely shifted and vertically reciprocated elements comprising the needle bar and related components. Interestingly, as weight is removed from rapidly moving elements, some of the reinforcing structures required for controlling high G-forces acting upon heavier weight may also be eliminated. Thus, the removal of weight from the vertically reciprocating needle bar, needles, and attached structures may contribute to the use of lighter weight vertically reciprocating pushrods. The lighter weight needle bar assembly may also lead to the removal of reinforcing structures previously deemed necessary to enable rapid transverse movement. Therefore, to further reduce harmonic vibrations and achieve faster tufting machine operation, it is desirable to design needle bar assemblies with reduced weight and in view of the lighter weight needle bar assembly to further reduce weight throughout the main drive and transverse shifting systems acting upon the needle bar.
Referring to
In operation, the offset of the cam within the upper end of the connecting rod 15 determines the throw of the connecting rod 15 which is imparted by its connection through bridges 30 to push rods 20 that reciprocally slide through upper and lower guide bearings 19 in a vertical direction. Push rod 20, as shown in isolation in
Because the volume of metal that is removed by drilling the cylindrical opening 22 in the top portion of push rod 20 is proportional to the cross-sectional area of the void (πr2), a slight increase in the radius of the opening 22 produces a greater reduction in the volume of metal and corresponding weight that is removed. So for instance, in connection with a one inch diameter push rod, the prior art ⅝ inch inner diameter ( 5/16ths radius) removed less than 40% of the metal of the push rod. By increasing the inner diameter to 13/16 of an inch from ⅝ (or 10/16) inch, the effect is to remove 66% of the volume of metal comprising the solid rod. Thus, halving the wall thickness of push rods 20 around the cylindrical opening 22 provides a 70% increase in weight reduction by gun drilling.
Accordingly, material reduction of 50% or more by utilizing cylindrical walls 23 having a thickness of 0.1 inches or less can achieve substantial reduction in reciprocating weight when multiplied by eight or more push rods 20 that might be deployed in a typical tufting machine.
Turning then to
Turning then to the vertical drive blocks 50 and horizontal drive block bracket 60 illustrated in
Notably, the rigidity of the needlebar 39 is enhanced by a series of box like reinforcing structures. For instance, in
In
The standard and support brackets 41,42 are fixed to the top of needle bar 39 that will have needles 70 protruding from its lower surface. Needles 70 shown in
Prior art needleblocks 81 with needles 80 are shown in
Vertical drive blocks are distributed evenly across the tufting machine, typically with about two drive blocks per meter of tufting machine width. Transverse drive blocks are advantageously placed between the pair of vertical drive blocks adjacent the end of the needlebar.
Furthermore, in prior art shifting needle bar designs it was common to have at least two transverse drive blocks at each side of the tufting machine because the weight of the needle bar that was to be shifted transversely required greater reinforcement to drive the needle assembly effectively. As can be seen in
Numerous alterations of the structure and techniques herein disclosed will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be understood that the present disclosure relates to the preferred embodiment of the invention which is for purposes of illustration only and not to be construed as a limitation of the invention. All such modifications which do not depart from the spirit of the invention are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
Numerous alterations of the structure and techniques herein disclosed will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be understood that the present disclosure relates to the preferred embodiment of the invention which is for purposes of illustration only and not to be construed as a limitation of the invention. All such modifications which do not depart from the spirit of the invention are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application 62/778,727 filed Dec. 12, 2018.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2966866 | Card | Jan 1961 | A |
3026830 | Bryant | Mar 1962 | A |
3301205 | Card | Jan 1967 | A |
3847098 | Hammel, Jr. | Nov 1974 | A |
4173192 | Schmidt | Nov 1979 | A |
4366761 | Card | Jan 1983 | A |
4399758 | Bagnall | Aug 1983 | A |
4465001 | Ingram | Aug 1984 | A |
4501212 | Slattery | Feb 1985 | A |
4662291 | Bardsley | May 1987 | A |
4815402 | Price | Mar 1989 | A |
5193472 | Crossley | Mar 1993 | A |
5320053 | Beasley | Jun 1994 | A |
5706745 | Neely | Jan 1998 | A |
6263811 | Crossley | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6735837 | Pum | May 2004 | B2 |
7373705 | Jean | May 2008 | B2 |
7578249 | Morgante | Aug 2009 | B2 |
9260810 | Neely | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9290874 | Mathews | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9657419 | Hall | May 2017 | B2 |
9708739 | Hall | Jul 2017 | B2 |
10011932 | Neely | Jul 2018 | B2 |
11193225 | Hall | Dec 2021 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200190717 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62778727 | Dec 2018 | US |