1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to medical devices and, more particularly, to medical devices configured for a limited number of uses and/or period of use.
2. Background of the Related Art
Certain medical devices (or components thereof) are capable of being used multiple times, and are thus referred to as reusable devices (or reusable components), while other medical devices (or components thereof) are configured for single use, and are thus referred to as disposable devices (or disposable components). Many such reusable and disposable medical devices, and/or the components thereof, are designed for a pre-determined number of uses and/or for a pre-determined usage time. Use of these devices beyond their prescribed usage time or number of uses may result in failure of the device, damage to the device or surrounds, and/or injury to the patient or clinician. On the other hand, given the rising costs of performing medical procedures, clinician's have an incentive to maximize the reuse of medical devices (or components thereof).
Like reference numerals may refer to similar or identical elements throughout the description of the figures. As shown in the drawings and described throughout the following description, as is traditional when referring to relative positioning on a surgical device, the term “proximal” refers to the end of the apparatus that is closer to the user and the term “distal” refers to the end of the apparatus that is farther away from the user. The term “clinician” refers to any medical professional (e.g., doctor, surgeon, nurse, or the like) performing a medical procedure involving the use of aspects described herein.
In at least one aspect of the present disclosure, a surgical system comprises an end effector assembly configured to conduct energy through tissue to treat tissue, the end effector assembly including at least one limited-use portion, the limited-use portion configured to degrade during use, and a control system configured to monitor degradation of the limited-use portion.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the control system includes a sensor configured to sense at least one characteristic indicative of degradation of the limited-use portion and to provide a signal representative of the at least one characteristic sensed.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the end effector assembly includes an energizable electrode and an insulator in proximity to the energizable electrode, the limited-use portion including at least a portion of the insulator.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the insulator is configured to degrade as a result of energy conduction therethrough or adjacent thereto.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the control system monitors the insulator such that when the insulator erodes to a predetermined threshold, the control system inhibits energy transmission to the end effector assembly.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, when the insulator erodes sufficiently so as to short-circuit the end effector assembly, the control system inhibits energy transmission to the end effector assembly.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the end effector assembly includes an energizable electrode, the limited-use portion including at least a portion of the electrode.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the electrode erodes as a result of energy conduction therethrough.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the control system monitors the electrode such that when the electrode erodes to a predetermined threshold, the control system inhibits energy transmission to the end effector assembly.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, when the electrode erodes sufficiently so as to short-circuit the end effector assembly, the control system inhibits energy transmission to the end effector assembly.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of surgery comprises providing a medical device including an end effector assembly configured to conduct energy through tissue to treat tissue, the end effector assembly including at least one limited-use portion configured to degrade with use, and monitoring degradation of the at least one limited-use portion.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the method further comprises monitoring degradation further includes sensing at least one characteristic indicative of degradation of the at least one limited-use portion.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the method further comprises the step of inhibiting energy transmission to the end effector assembly when degradation of the at least one limited-use portion exceeds a pre-determined threshold.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the method further comprises the step of inhibiting energy transmission to the end effector assembly when the at least one limited-use portion erodes sufficiently so as to short-circuit the end effector assembly.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, a medical device comprises an end effector assembly configured to conduct energy through tissue to treat tissue, the end effector assembly including at least one limited-use portion, the limited-use portion configured to degrade during use, wherein when the limited-use portion degrades beyond a predetermined threshold, the medical device transitions to an inoperable state.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the limited-use portion is an electrical portion of the end effector assembly, such that when the limited-use portion degrades beyond the predetermined threshold, the end effector becomes mechanically inoperable.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the limited use portion is an electrical component of the end effector assembly, such that when the limited-use portion degrades beyond the predetermined threshold, the end effector becomes electrically inoperable.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the medical device further comprises a control system that transitions the medical device to the inoperable state when the limited-use portion degrades beyond a predetermined threshold.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the limited-use portion is an electrical component of the end effector assembly, such that when the limited-use portion degrades beyond the predetermined threshold, the control device cuts an electrical supply from the end effector assembly.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the limited-use portion is an insulator of the end effector assembly, such that when the limited-use portion degrades beyond the predetermined threshold, the end effector assembly becomes electrically inoperable.
The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Particular embodiments of the present disclosure are described hereinbelow with reference to the accompanying drawings; however, the disclosed embodiments are merely examples of the disclosure and may be embodied in various forms. Well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to avoid obscuring the present disclosure in unnecessary detail. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present disclosure in virtually any appropriately detailed structure.
Referring now to
Turning now to
With continued reference to
End effector assembly 100 is shown attached at a distal end 14 of shaft 12 and includes a pair of opposing jaw members 110 and 120. Each of jaw members 110 and 120 includes an opposed electrically conductive tissue-sealing surface 112, 122, respectively (
Continuing with reference to
Referring now to
A ratchet 30′ may be included for selectively locking the jaw members 110 and 120 relative to one another at various positions during pivoting. It is envisioned that the ratchet 30′ may include graduations or other visual markings that enable the user to easily and quickly ascertain and control the amount of closure force desired between the jaw members 110 and 120.
With continued reference to
Turning now to
With continued reference to
With reference now generally to
Referring specifically to
Eroding insulator 117 may include at least one sensor 150 disposed within, on, or in proximity to the insulator 117 such that the sensor 150 can sense a characteristic indicative of erosion of insulator 117. For example, sensor 150 may be configured to detect when electrode 126 comes within a certain distance or contacts with the sensor 150, e.g., via sensing magnetic field, electrical field, electrical current passing from the electrode 126 to the sensor 150, tactile contact with the sensor 150, impedance, a change in capacitance between the electrode 126 and the sensor 150, etc. Sensor 150 may alternatively or additionally be configured to sense any other suitable property or properties of insulator 117, from which a relative amount of erosion of insulator 117 can be determined.
Sensor 150 may be hard-wired or wirelessly connected to a sensing system configured to warn a user and/or prevent further use when a predefined amount of erosion has been determined. For example, sensor 150 may be directly connected to the generator “G” (
In some embodiments, the insulator 117 may erode until electrical cutting member 126 and insulator 117 no longer maintain a gap distance between seal plates 112, 122, but, rather, allow seal plates 112 and 122 to contact one another and create a brief short circuit scenario. This short circuiting may be sensed by a sensing system (not shown) and the sensing system (not shown) may, as a result of the short circuiting, warn a user and/or prevent further use of the medical instrument. In some embodiments, the generator “G” includes a sensing algorithm for detecting a short circuit and preventing electrical output thereafter. In any case, the safety of the patient is ensured by disallowing damage to the device or tissue as a result of the short circuit scenario because the energy supply may be immediately cut off upon sensing of the short circuit scenario.
In some embodiments, such as that shown in
Referring to
In some embodiments, such as that shown in
Sensing system 585 may be implemented via any suitable hardware and software components. In particular, sensing system 585 may include a computer implemented algorithm, analog electrical circuit, or combination of analog electrical circuits/microprocessor based circuitry. Sensing system 585 may be included in the generator “G” as shown, or may be separate therefrom.
Referring to
When the electrode 526 erodes and short circuiting occurs, fuse 571 is tripped preventing any further energy from being transfer to end effector assembly 100. Only when the end effector assembly 100 is removed and replaced, or when a new instrument with a new end effector assembly 100 is connected to the electrosurgical generator, will the fuse resetting device 575 trigger resetting of fuse 571 and enable further use of end effector assembly 100. Alternatively, fuse 571 may be disposed on or within the end effector assembly 100 such that when the insulator 427 or electrode 526 erodes a predetermined amount, the fuse 571 permanently breaks, requiring replacement of the end effector assembly 100.
The sensing systems described herein may be included in generator “G” and be implemented through, and integrated with, any suitable generator control software/hardware. For example, the generator control software may be ForceTriad™ software sold by Covidien, LP.
It should be understood that the foregoing description is only illustrative of the present disclosure. Various alternatives and modifications can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the disclosure. Accordingly, the present disclosure is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances. The embodiments described with reference to the attached drawing figs. are presented only to demonstrate certain examples of the disclosure. Other elements, steps, methods and techniques that are insubstantially different from those described above and/or in the appended claims are also intended to be within the scope of the disclosure.
The present application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/770,088, filed on Feb. 27, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D249549 | Pike | Sep 1978 | S |
D263020 | Rau, III | Feb 1982 | S |
D295893 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D295894 | Sharkany et al. | May 1988 | S |
D298353 | Manno | Nov 1988 | S |
D299413 | DeCarolis | Jan 1989 | S |
D343453 | Noda | Jan 1994 | S |
D348930 | Olson | Jul 1994 | S |
D349341 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1994 | S |
D354564 | Medema | Jan 1995 | S |
D358887 | Feinberg | May 1995 | S |
D384413 | Zlock et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
H1745 | Paraschac | Aug 1998 | H |
D402028 | Grimm et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
D408018 | McNaughton | Apr 1999 | S |
D416089 | Barton et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
D424694 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
D425201 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2000 | S |
H1904 | Yates et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
D449886 | Tetzlaff et al. | Oct 2001 | S |
D453923 | Olson | Feb 2002 | S |
D454951 | Bon | Mar 2002 | S |
D457958 | Dycus et al. | May 2002 | S |
D457959 | Tetzlaff et al. | May 2002 | S |
H2037 | Yates et al. | Jul 2002 | H |
D465281 | Lang | Nov 2002 | S |
D466209 | Bon | Nov 2002 | S |
D493888 | Reschke | Aug 2004 | S |
D496997 | Dycus et al. | Oct 2004 | S |
D499181 | Dycus et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
D502994 | Blake, III | Mar 2005 | S |
D509297 | Wells | Sep 2005 | S |
D525361 | Hushka | Jul 2006 | S |
D531311 | Guerra et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
D533274 | Visconti et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D533942 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2006 | S |
D535027 | James et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
D538932 | Malik | Mar 2007 | S |
D541418 | Schechter et al. | Apr 2007 | S |
D541611 | Aglassinger | May 2007 | S |
D541938 | Kerr et al. | May 2007 | S |
D545432 | Watanabe | Jun 2007 | S |
D547154 | Lee | Jul 2007 | S |
D564662 | Moses et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
D567943 | Moses et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D575395 | Hushka | Aug 2008 | S |
D575401 | Hixson et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D582038 | Swoyer et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
D617900 | Kingsley et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617901 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617902 | Twomey et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617903 | Unger et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D618798 | Olson et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D621503 | Otten et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
D627462 | Kingsley | Nov 2010 | S |
D628289 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D628290 | Romero | Nov 2010 | S |
D630324 | Reschke | Jan 2011 | S |
D649249 | Guerra | Nov 2011 | S |
D649643 | Allen, IV et al. | Nov 2011 | S |
D661394 | Romero et al. | Jun 2012 | S |
8522626 | Woodcock | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535311 | Schall | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8546999 | Houser et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579177 | Beetel | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20030208196 | Stone | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20100042097 | Newton | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110306972 | Widenhouse et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120205419 | Weir et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120248167 | Flanagan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130046303 | Evans et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130181033 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130186933 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130267950 | Rosa et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282024 | Blumenkranz | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289558 | Reid, Jr. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289559 | Reid, Jr. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289560 | DeCarlo et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140200580 | Joseph | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201299462 | Sep 2009 | CN |
2415263 | Oct 1975 | DE |
02514501 | Oct 1976 | DE |
2627679 | Jan 1977 | DE |
03423356 | Jun 1986 | DE |
03612646 | Apr 1987 | DE |
8712328 | Feb 1988 | DE |
04303882 | Feb 1995 | DE |
04403252 | Aug 1995 | DE |
19515914 | Jul 1996 | DE |
19506363 | Aug 1996 | DE |
29616210 | Nov 1996 | DE |
19608716 | Apr 1997 | DE |
19751106 | May 1998 | DE |
19751108 | May 1999 | DE |
19946527 | Jul 2001 | DE |
20121161 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10045375 | Oct 2002 | DE |
202007009165 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009317 | Aug 2007 | DE |
202007009318 | Aug 2007 | DE |
10031773 | Nov 2007 | DE |
202007016233 | Jan 2008 | DE |
19738457 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102004026179 | Jan 2009 | DE |
102008018406 | Jul 2009 | DE |
1281878 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1159926 | Mar 2003 | EP |
61-501068 | Sep 1984 | JP |
10-24051 | Jan 1989 | JP |
11-47150 | Jun 1989 | JP |
6-502328 | Mar 1992 | JP |
5-5106 | Jan 1993 | JP |
05-40112 | Feb 1993 | JP |
0006030945 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6-121797 | May 1994 | JP |
6-285078 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-511401 | Dec 1994 | JP |
06343644 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07265328 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8-56955 | May 1996 | JP |
08252263 | Oct 1996 | JP |
8-289895 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8-317934 | Dec 1996 | JP |
8-317936 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9-10223 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09000538 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9-122138 | May 1997 | JP |
0010000195 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-155798 | Jun 1998 | JP |
11-070124 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-169381 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-192238 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11244298 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-102545 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-135222 | May 2000 | JP |
2000342599 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000350732 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001008944 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001029356 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-03400 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001128990 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-190564 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-136525 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-528166 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-116871 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-175052 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003245285 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-517668 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-528869 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2005-152663 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-253789 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-015078 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-501939 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-095316 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2011125195 | Jun 2011 | JP |
401367 | Oct 1973 | SU |
0036986 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0059392 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0115614 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0154604 | Aug 2001 | WO |
02045589 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2006021269 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2005110264 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2008040483 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2011018154 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 08/926,869, filed Sep. 10, 1997, James G. Chandler. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/177,950, filed Oct. 23, 1998, Randel A. Frazier. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/387,883, filed Sep. 1, 1999, Schmaltz et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/591,328, filed Jun. 9, 2000, Ryan et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,970, filed Dec. 17, 2008, Sremcich et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/421,373, filed Mar. 15, 2012, John R. Twomey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,325, filed Mar. 26, 2012, William H. Nau, Jr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/433,924, filed Mar. 29, 2012, Keir Hart. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/448,577, filed Apr. 17, 2012, David M. Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,455, filed Apr. 30, 2012, Luke Waaler. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,335, filed May 1, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,378, filed May 1, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,397, filed May 1, 2012, James R. Unger. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,410, filed May 1, 2012, James R. Twomey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/466,274, filed May 8, 2012, Stephen M. Kendrick. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/467,767, filed May 9, 2012, Duane E. Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/470,775, filed May 14, 2012, James D. Allen, IV. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/482,589, filed May 29, 2012, Eric R. Larson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/483,733, filed May 30, 2012, Dennis W. Butcher. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/537,517, filed Jun. 29, 2012, David N. Heard. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/537,577, filed Jun. 29, 2012, Tony Moua. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/708,335, filed Dec. 7, 2012, Dumbauld. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/731,674, filed Dec. 31, 2012, Siebrecht. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/799,173, filed Mar. 13, 2013, Larson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,636, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,762, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/803,884, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,010, filed Mar. 14, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,823, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,703, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/835,004, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Twomey. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,945, filed Mar. 15, 2013, Stoddard. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,732, filed Apr. 23, 2013, Mueller. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/893,527, filed May 14, 2013, Horner. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/903,091, filed May 28, 2013, Nau. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/903,116, filed May 28, 2013, Nau. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/903,223, filed May 28, 2013, Payne. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/909,362, filed Jun. 4, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/911,674, filed Jun. 6, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/920,643, filed Jun. 18, 2013, Nau. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/922,377, filed Jun. 20, 2013, Allen. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/922,975, filed Jun. 20, 2013, McKenna. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,409, filed Jul. 2, 2013, Mueller. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,683, filed Jul. 2, 2013, Nau. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/936,510, filed Jul. 8, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/947,991, filed Jul. 22, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/969,204, filed Aug. 16, 2013, Bucciaglia. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/969,278, filed Aug. 16, 2013, Kerr. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/017,572, filed Sep. 4, 2013, Arya. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,031, filed Sep. 5, 2013, Garrison. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,094, filed Sep. 5, 2013, Garrison. |
Michael Choti, “Abdominoperineal Resection with the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System and LigaSure Atlas 20 cm Open Instrument”; Innovations That Work, Jun. 2003. |
Chung et al., “Clinical Experience of Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum vol. 46, No. 1 Jan. 2003. |
Tinkcler L.F., “Combined Diathermy and Suction Forceps”, Feb. 6, 1967 (Feb. 6, 1965), British Medical Journal Feb. 6, 1976, vol. 1, nr. 5431 p. 361, ISSN: 0007-1447. |
Carbonell et al., “Comparison of theGyrus PlasmaKinetic Sealer and the Valleylab LigaSure Device in the Hemostasis of Small, Medium, and Large-Sized Arteries” Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Date: Aug. 2003. |
Peterson et al. “Comparison of Healing Process Following Ligation with Sutures and Bipolar Vessel Sealing” Surgical Technology International (2001). |
“Electrosurgery: A Historical Overview” Innovations in Electrosurgery; Sales/Product Literature; Dec. 31, 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealing Device in Hemorrhoidectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
E. David Crawford “Evaluation of a New Vessel Sealing Device in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Johnson et al. “Evaluation of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hemorrhoidectormy” American College of Surgeons (ACS) Clinicla Congress Poster (2000). |
Muller et al., “Extended Left Hemicolectomy Using the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System” Innovations That Work, Sep. 1999. |
Kennedy et al. “High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing” Surgical Endoscopy (1998) 12: 876-878. |
Burdette et al. “In Vivo Probe Measurement Technique for Determining Dielectric Properties at VHF Through Microwave Frequencies”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. MTT-28, No. 4, Apr. 1980 pp. 414-427. |
Carus et al., “Initial Experience With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Abdominal Surgery” Innovations That Work, Jun. 2002. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Research and Clinical Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Oct. 1999. |
Heniford et al. “Initial Results with an Electrothermal Bipolar Vessel Sealer” Surgical Endoscopy (2000) 15:799-801. |
Herman et al., “Laparoscopic Intestinal Resection With the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: A Case Report”; Innovations That Work, Feb. 2002. |
Koyle et al., “Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocele Ligation in Children and Adolescents” Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, vol. 6, No. 1, 2002. |
W. Scott Helton, “LigaSure Vessel Sealing System: Revolutionary Hemostasis Product for General Surgery”; Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
LigaSure Vessel Sealing System, the Seal of Confidence in General, Gynecologic, Urologic, and Laparaoscopic Surgery; Sales/Product Literature; Apr. 2002. |
Joseph Ortenberg “LigaSure System Used in Laparoscopic 1st and 2nd Stage Orchiopexy” Innovations That Work, Nov. 2002. |
Sigel et al. “The Mechanism of Blood Vessel Closure by High Frequency Electrocoagulation” Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics, Oct. 1965 pp. 823-831. |
Sampayan et al, “Multilayer Ultra-High Gradient Insulator Technology” Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, 1998. Netherlands Aug. 17-21, 1998; vol. 2, pp. 740-743. |
Paul G. Horgan, “A Novel Technique for Parenchymal Division During Hepatectomy” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 181, No. 3, Apr. 2001 pp. 236-237. |
Benaron et al., “Optical Time-of-Flight and Absorbance Imaging of Biologic Media”, Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, vol. 259, Mar. 5, 1993, pp. 1463-1466. |
Olsson et al. “Radical Cystectomy in Females” Current Surgical Techniques in Urology, vol. 14, Issue 3, 2001. |
Palazzo et al. “Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy” British Journal of Surgery 2002, 89, 154-157. |
Levy et al. “Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal hysterectomy” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 102, No. 1, Jul. 2003. |
“Reducing Needlestick Injuries in the Operating Room” Sales/Product Literature 2001. |
Bergdahl et al. “Studies on Coagulation and the Development of an Automatic Computerized Bipolar Coagulator” J. Neurosurg, vol. 75, Jul. 1991, pp. 148-151. |
Strasberg et al. “A Phase I Study of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Hepatic Surgery” Section of HPB Surger, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO, Presented at AHPBA, Feb. 2001. |
Sayfan et al. “Sutureless Closed Hemorrhoidectomy: A New Technique” Annals of Surgery vol. 234 No. 1 Jul. 2001; pp. 21-24. |
Levy et al., “Update on Hysterectomy—New Technologies and Techniques” OBG Management, Feb. 2003. |
Dulemba et al. “Use of a Bipolar Electrothermal Vessel Sealer in Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy” Sales/Product Literature; Jan. 2004. |
Strasberg et al., “Use of a Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device for Parenchymal Transection During Liver Surgery” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 6, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2002 pp. 569-574. |
Sengupta et al., “Use of a Computer-Controlled Bipolar Diathermy System in Radical Prostatectomies and Other Open Urological Surgery” ANZ Journal of Surgery (2001) 71.9 pp. 538-540. |
Rothenberg et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children” Int'l Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) 2000. |
Crawford et al. “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Urologic Cancer Surgery” Grand Rounds in Urology 1999 vol. 1 Issue 4 pp. 10-17. |
Craig Johnson, “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System in Bloodless Hemorrhoidectomy” Innovations That Work, Mar. 2000. |
Levy et al. “Use of a New Energy-based Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) World Congress 1999. |
Barbara Levy, “Use of a New Vessel Ligation Device During Vaginal Hysterectomy” FIGO 2000, Washington, D.C. |
E. David Crawford “Use of a Novel Vessel Sealing Technology in Management of the Dorsal Veinous Complex” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Jarrett et al., “Use of the LigaSure Vessel Sealing System for Peri-Hilar Vessels in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy” Sales/Product Literature 2000. |
Crouch et al. “A Velocity-Dependent Model for Needle Insertion in Soft Tissue” MICCAI 2005; LNCS 3750 pp. 624-632, Dated: 2005. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Pelvic Surgery” Int'l Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics FIGO World Congress 2000, Washington, D.C. |
McLellan et al. “Vessel Sealing for Hemostasis During Gynecologic Surgery” Sales/Product Literature 1999. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140243811 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61770088 | Feb 2013 | US |